This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 01.4718* 05 21 07.68 +23 38 19.8 10.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
N Tau,2461284.9718,10.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
N Tau 20260901.4718 10.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 01.4718* 05 21 07.65 +23 38 19.9 10.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
N Tau,2461284.9718,10.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
N Tau 20260901.4718 10.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 01.4718 2461284.9718 13.02 05:28:24.72 +23:42:54.4
182.35267 -6.04923 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 3.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.110 Lydia -1 -0 1 13.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:28:24.72 +23:42:54.4: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:28:24.72 +23:42:54.4: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 01.4718* 05 28 24.72 +23 42 54.4 13.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461284.9718,13.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260901.4718 13.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 01.4718 2461284.9718 13.95 05:19:20.72 +20:22:07.7
183.99805 -9.64841 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 2.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.168 Sibylla -1 -0 1 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:19:20.72 +20:22:07.7: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:19:20.72 +20:22:07.7: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 01.4718* 05 19 20.72 +20 22 07.7 13.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461284.9718,13.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260901.4718 13.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 01.4718 2461284.9718 14.22 05:24:34.47 +21:43:53.1
183.53338 -7.87804 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 3.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.449 Hamburga -0 -1 1 14.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:24:34.47 +21:43:53.1: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:24:34.47 +21:43:53.1: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 01.4718* 05 24 34.47 +21 43 53.1 14.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461284.9718,14.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260901.4718 14.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461284.97199507 01.09.2026 11:19:30.374 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 18113
Objects passed selection criteria: 17999
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12317.8
Average stars matched: 11832 (96.0565 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 243536 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Sep 1 06:27:26 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461284.97199507 01.09.2026 11:19:30.374 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 121
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 39 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 138787
Objects passed selection criteria: 138322
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 97939.2
Average stars matched: 92292.5 (94.2344 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 603824 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Sep 1 06:28:56 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461284.97153245
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.556 +22:00:03.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:19.556 +22:00:03.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0015 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.548 +21:59:44.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:19.548 +21:59:44.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0036 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:19.556 +22:00:03.17
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:19.548 +21:59:44.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00512 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.f1onYw19q6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yOOUDmrQ7P
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gYrT6lubJT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vNQbhB6c3a
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.969200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.969200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec +16.4876 to +27.3008 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec 16.4876 to 27.3008 deg
Loaded 12329 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8847 out of 10017 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10017 out of 20916 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.2 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.f1onYw19q6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2479, bad_region=3694, passed=22997
Got 22997 stars (including 17090 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4775 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4774 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4705 stars left (next iteration limit 5175)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4705 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=1788 n_q2=376 n_q3=1844 n_q4=697 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.193
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.yOOUDmrQ7P (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2320, bad_region=3377, passed=20916
Got 20916 stars (including 15475 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4776 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4707 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4707 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4777 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4708 stars left (next iteration limit 5177)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4708 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.402 n_q1=1784 n_q2=371 n_q3=1863 n_q4=690 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.gYrT6lubJT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=659, bad_region=2947, passed=9300
Got 9300 stars (including 5880 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9300 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4787 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4707 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4707 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4790 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 4708 stars left (next iteration limit 5177)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4708 robust_rms=7.071 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.754 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4708 robust_rms=0.492 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.544 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4708 robust_rms=0.449 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.522 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4708 robust_rms_before=0.908 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.518 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.492 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.651 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.544
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.538 +22:00:02.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 9300 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1373718.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 3, robust RMS 0.908 -> 0.492 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits N_match=4708 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.655 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.497 n_q1=1244 n_q2=1265 n_q3=941 n_q4=1258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.212
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.vNQbhB6c3a (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=656, bad_region=2924, passed=9278
Got 9278 stars (including 5888 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9278 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4789 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4713 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6981 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4790 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6981 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6981 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 4712 stars left (next iteration limit 5182)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4712 robust_rms=6.907 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.641 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4712 robust_rms=0.498 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.551 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4712 robust_rms=0.455 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.524 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4712 robust_rms_before=0.920 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.518 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.498 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.650 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.551
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.525 +21:59:44.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 9278 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1373728.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 3, robust RMS 0.920 -> 0.498 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits N_match=4712 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.532 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.597 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.629 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.513 n_q1=1242 n_q2=1267 n_q3=937 n_q4=1266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.184
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.386 worst_q_ratio=1.193
ref2=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits sigma_overall=0.515 worst_q_ratio=1.175
new1=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits sigma_overall=0.541 worst_q_ratio=1.212
new2=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits sigma_overall=0.532 worst_q_ratio=1.184
reference average sigma_overall=0.4505 worst_q_ratio=1.184
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (4705 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_astrometric_residuals.png (4708 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558_astrometric_residuals.png (4708 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559_astrometric_residuals.png (4712 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30582_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 30582_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:42.66 +25:11:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30898_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
Preparing report for the candidate 30898_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31791_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 31791_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:52.06 +19:58:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31814_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 31814_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:09.68 +19:28:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.31 +17:54:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.538 +22:00:02.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:19.538 +22:00:02.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0013 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.525 +21:59:44.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:19.525 +21:59:44.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0038 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:19.538 +22:00:02.48
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:19.525 +21:59:44.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00511 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.F0npO3jF1s
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.L9HpAMtO0o
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5EkNsX7WKi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5lf3LV3tFX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 163013 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec +16.4845 to +27.3051 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec 16.4845 to 27.3051 deg
Loaded 12419 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7184 out of 10475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10475 out of 163013 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 107 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
1.8 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.F0npO3jF1s (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=21684, bad_region=23036, passed=167940
Got 167940 stars (including 124901 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4762 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4763 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4714 stars left (next iteration limit 5185)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4714 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=1719 n_q2=437 n_q3=1839 n_q4=719 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.214
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.L9HpAMtO0o (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=20219, bad_region=22244, passed=162977
Got 162977 stars (including 121992 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 162977 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4706 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4706 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 145759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 145759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4704 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 145759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4704 stars left (next iteration limit 5176)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4704 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.615 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.412 n_q1=1720 n_q2=418 n_q3=1843 n_q4=723 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.238
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.5EkNsX7WKi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=4125, bad_region=15018, passed=69349
Got 69349 stars (including 51438 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 69349 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4774 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4710 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4775 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4708 stars left (next iteration limit 5178)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4708 robust_rms=7.071 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.373 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4708 robust_rms=0.486 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.546 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4708 robust_rms=0.444 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.514 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4708 robust_rms_before=0.491 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.505 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.444 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.561 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.514
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.561 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits N_match=4708 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.602 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.553 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.508 n_q1=1297 n_q2=1197 n_q3=972 n_q4=1242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.142
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.5lf3LV3tFX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=4113, bad_region=14820, passed=68705
Got 68705 stars (including 50961 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 68705 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4777 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4709 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57713 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4777 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57713 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57713 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 4708 stars left (next iteration limit 5178)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4708 robust_rms=6.974 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.148 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4708 robust_rms=0.490 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.544 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4708 robust_rms=0.452 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.514 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4708 robust_rms_before=0.497 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.502 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.452 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.557 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.514
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.557 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits N_match=4708 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.592 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.508 n_q1=1298 n_q2=1202 n_q3=976 n_q4=1232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.156
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-18-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_062349_TTUQ2b1x1_1340119_S4ZEdIPz/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:20:17.72 +24:43:19.0: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:22:55.26 +23:19:50.7: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:27:16.59 +25:47:28.7: 13.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:28:40.86 +25:19:05.0: 13.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:25:20.15 +22:37:51.3: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:33:45.75 +20:59:07.5: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:37:07.07 +19:55:45.8: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:27:16.59 +25:47:28.7: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:28:40.86 +25:19:05.0: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:22:55.26 +23:19:50.7: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:20:17.72 +24:43:19.0: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:25:20.15 +22:37:51.3: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:33:45.75 +20:59:07.5: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:16.59 +25:47:28.7: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7568 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:28:40.86 +25:19:05.0: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1381 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:22:55.26 +23:19:50.7: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7143 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:17.72 +24:43:19.0: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6159 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:25:20.15 +22:37:51.3: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9741 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:33:45.75 +20:59:07.5: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5335 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:48:25.45 +21:55:26.6: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:37:07.07 +19:55:45.8: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:07.07 +19:55:45.8: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4824 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:48:25.45 +21:55:26.6: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:48:25.45 +21:55:26.6: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1606 delta=-1.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:25:56.00 +18:37:52.1: 11.13 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:34:07.79 +24:25:08.3: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:34:07.79 +24:25:08.3: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:25:56.00 +18:37:52.1: 11.15 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.14 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:07.79 +24:25:08.3: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9892 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:25:56.00 +18:37:52.1: ref_mag=11.14 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4726 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:28:24.72 +23:42:54.4: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:28:24.72 +23:42:54.4: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:21.63 +25:20:29.1: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:37:40.04 +22:58:28.2: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:29:17.69 +21:19:43.3: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:21.63 +25:20:29.1: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:21.63 +25:20:29.1: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4245 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:37:40.04 +22:58:28.2: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:40.04 +22:58:28.2: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4405 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:29:17.69 +21:19:43.3: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:29:17.69 +21:19:43.3: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5663 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:19:20.72 +20:22:07.7: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:38:53.61 +18:38:45.3: 13.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:59.48 +21:37:57.8: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:19:20.72 +20:22:07.7: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:38:53.61 +18:38:45.3: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:38:53.61 +18:38:45.3: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7393 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:24:34.47 +21:43:53.1: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:59.48 +21:37:57.8: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:59.48 +21:37:57.8: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1355 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:13:05.07 +20:18:41.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:24:34.47 +21:43:53.1: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:13:05.07 +20:18:41.7: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:13:05.07 +20:18:41.7: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2643 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out193442.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out198294.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out199403.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189040_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189040_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189042_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189042_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:07.60 +22:13:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189044_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189044_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:11.91 +18:57:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189048_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189048_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:20.19 +19:45:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189054_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189054_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189055_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189055_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:29.83 +18:57:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189061_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189061_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189064_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189064_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189069_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189069_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189074_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189074_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189075_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189075_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189076_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189076_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:42.20 +20:52:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189077_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189077_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:06.29 +17:57:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189086_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189086_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:26.74 +25:17:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189087_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189087_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:56.30 +20:14:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189088_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189088_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189089_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189089_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:11.87 +18:29:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189092_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189092_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:58.00 +22:41:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189093_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189093_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:17.12 +18:20:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189094_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189094_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189098_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189098_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:56.38 +22:45:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189099_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189099_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189407_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
Preparing report for the candidate 189407_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189603_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189603_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:16.93 +20:08:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189641_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189641_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190420_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 190420_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:52.12 +19:58:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190888_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 190888_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.13 +22:38:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191521_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 191521_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:50.72 +22:27:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192229_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 192229_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:09.90 +18:33:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192488_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 192488_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:11.70 +19:34:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192653_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 192653_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:37.00 +25:05:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192696_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 192696_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:40.10 +18:13:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192719_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 192719_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:00.57 +20:46:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192861_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 192861_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:00.26 +18:59:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192922_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 192922_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:54.79 +23:40:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193086_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 193086_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:12.70 +24:31:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193149_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 193149_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:10.96 +20:10:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193196_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 193196_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:37.27 +18:52:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193257_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 193257_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:38.36 +18:33:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193442_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
Preparing report for the candidate 193442_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193490_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 193490_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:13.67 +21:51:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193519_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 193519_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:54.23 +26:06:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193556_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 193556_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:34.23 +17:39:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193583_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 193583_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:11.80 +22:40:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193725_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 193725_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:42.23 +23:00:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193835_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 193835_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:40.16 +20:26:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194085_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 194085_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:59.63 +22:34:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194411_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 194411_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:02.32 +24:18:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194516_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 194516_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:02.96 +18:33:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194518_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 194518_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:23.14 +25:24:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194625_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 194625_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:12.96 +20:07:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194628_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 194628_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:11.20 +18:40:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194684_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 194684_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:27.08 +20:53:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194715_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 194715_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:36.54 +22:27:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194858_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 194858_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.85 +19:32:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195254_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 195254_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:37.10 +25:25:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195260_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 195260_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:10.42 +19:41:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195343_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 195343_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:08.63 +20:02:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195384_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 195384_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:50.97 +20:15:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195388_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 195388_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:10.62 +20:05:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195393_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 195393_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:02.36 +22:58:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195437_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 195437_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195547_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 195547_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:41.39 +20:56:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195642_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 195642_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:37.48 +22:23:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195656_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 195656_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195687_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 195687_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:29.57 +21:46:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195729_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 195729_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:20.18 +24:24:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195812_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 195812_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:45.59 +21:24:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195973_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 195973_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:14.93 +19:35:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196101_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 196101_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196108_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 196108_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:15.56 +18:46:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196129_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 196129_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:22.34 +23:21:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196172_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 196172_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:03.96 +19:09:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196222_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 196222_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:00.21 +24:57:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196313_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 196313_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:40.28 +23:12:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196373_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 196373_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:18.98 +21:33:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196445_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 196445_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:29.09 +18:44:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196487_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 196487_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:05.75 +23:11:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196517_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 196517_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:44.79 +21:12:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196614_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 196614_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:21.88 +24:21:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196832_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 196832_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:25.06 +18:04:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196857_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 196857_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:07.03 +24:22:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196971_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 196971_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:17.19 +20:45:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197128_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 197128_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:25.27 +23:07:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197587_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 197587_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:30.28 +20:09:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197611_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 197611_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.97 +26:10:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197612_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 197612_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:04.52 +20:26:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197769_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 197769_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:11.41 +25:40:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197875_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 197875_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198294_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
Preparing report for the candidate 198294_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198333_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 198333_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:50.27 +25:14:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198453_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 198453_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198495_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 198495_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198602_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 198602_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:58.86 +21:26:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199012_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 199012_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:51.61 +20:00:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199014_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 199014_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199231_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 199231_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:12.07 +25:35:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199301_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 199301_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199325_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 199325_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199346_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 199346_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:04.83 +23:13:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199403_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
Preparing report for the candidate 199403_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199449_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 199449_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:21.62 +22:50:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:00.42 +26:13:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180008_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 180008_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:18.14 +20:22:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.28 +17:54:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109779_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 109779_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-09-01_06-19-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
