This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461284.9498,6.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260901.4498 6.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461284.9498,7.42,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260901.4498 7.42CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 01.4498 2461284.9498 11.13 06:58:16.10 +22:23:14.9
193.48033 11.43122 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.27 Euterpe -1 -0 1 11.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:58:16.10 +22:23:14.9: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:58:16.10 +22:23:14.9: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461284.9498,11.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260901.4498 11.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 01.4498 2461284.9498 12.12 07:00:15.72 +23:59:33.9
192.18313 12.51591 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 9.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.30 Urania -0 0 0 12.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:00:15.72 +23:59:33.9: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:00:15.72 +23:59:33.9: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461284.9498,12.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260901.4498 12.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 01.4498 2461284.9498 13.03 07:14:04.73 +24:55:42.7
192.60272 15.77093 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 9.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.111 Ate 0 -0 0 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:14:04.73 +24:55:42.7: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:14:04.73 +24:55:42.7: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461284.9498,13.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260901.4498 13.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461284.95034869 01.09.2026 10:48:20.127 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22004
Objects passed selection criteria: 21836
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13365.5
Average stars matched: 12991.5 (97.2018 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 246720 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Sep 1 05:52:05 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461284.95034869 01.09.2026 10:48:20.127 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 85
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 21 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 139696
Objects passed selection criteria: 139171
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 93026.2
Average stars matched: 89174 (95.859 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 605272 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Sep 1 05:53:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461284.94924979
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:52.586 +22:00:26.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:22:52.586 +22:00:26.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0442 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.836 +22:01:00.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:22:55.836 +22:01:00.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0353 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:22:52.586 +22:00:26.53
Second-epoch second image center 07:22:55.836 +22:01:00.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01569 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Hy1dbbCJuP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fydssoUl6m
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IVqEelMzB4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rvFdHVCoN3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.929600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.929600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4801 to +27.2943 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4801 to 27.2943 deg
Loaded 13972 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10626 out of 11736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11736 out of 23398 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 10.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.Hy1dbbCJuP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, bad_region=1, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 21361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4811 stars left (next iteration limit 5292)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4811 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.341 n_q1=904 n_q2=1356 n_q3=1059 n_q4=1492 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.183
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.fydssoUl6m (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2268, bad_region=1, passed=23398
Got 23398 stars (including 21095 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4806 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4806 stars left (next iteration limit 5285)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4806 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.377 n_q1=895 n_q2=1351 n_q3=1061 n_q4=1499 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.IVqEelMzB4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=273, bad_region=0, passed=3351
Got 3351 stars (including 3071 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3351 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2982 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3340 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2982 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3341 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3341 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 2953 stars left (next iteration limit 3248)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2953 robust_rms=6.572 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=68.540 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2953 robust_rms=0.573 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.955 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2953 robust_rms=0.475 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.685 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2953 robust_rms_before=0.928 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.472 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.475 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.608 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.685
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.608 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits N_match=2953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.604 n_q1=858 n_q2=440 n_q3=1345 n_q4=310 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.239
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.rvFdHVCoN3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=264, bad_region=0, passed=3420
Got 3420 stars (including 3150 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3420 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3044 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3019 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3011 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3019 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3410 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3044 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3019 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3409 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3019 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3409 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 3019 stars left (next iteration limit 3320)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3019 robust_rms=7.006 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=60.262 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3019 robust_rms=0.603 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.835 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3019 robust_rms=0.478 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.702 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3019 robust_rms_before=0.931 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.480 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.478 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.678 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.702
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.678 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits N_match=3019 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.586 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.634 n_q1=757 n_q2=469 n_q3=1392 n_q4=401 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.304
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits sigma_overall=0.387 worst_q_ratio=1.183
ref2=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits sigma_overall=0.426 worst_q_ratio=1.279
new1=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits sigma_overall=0.488 worst_q_ratio=1.239
new2=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits sigma_overall=0.486 worst_q_ratio=1.304
reference average sigma_overall=0.4065 worst_q_ratio=1.231
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153_astrometric_residuals.png (4811 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154_astrometric_residuals.png (4806 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498_astrometric_residuals.png (2953 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499_astrometric_residuals.png (3019 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:35.35 +22:51:40.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:42.80 +22:54:43.3: 10.03 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:35.35 +22:51:40.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:35.35 +22:51:40.3: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:42.80 +22:54:43.3: 10.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:42.80 +22:54:43.3: ref_mag=10.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=10.5578 delta=-0.53 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31356_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
Preparing report for the candidate 31356_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31374_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 31374_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31385_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 31385_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.08 +25:59:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31431_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 31431_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:52.586 +22:00:26.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:22:52.586 +22:00:26.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0442 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.836 +22:01:00.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:22:55.836 +22:01:00.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0353 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:22:52.586 +22:00:26.53
Second-epoch second image center 07:22:55.836 +22:01:00.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01569 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.c9NwamPd5l
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jBpTW5obl8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JlZQSz8SSl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JPIJs1fa0c
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.796750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.796750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 153605 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec +16.4748 to +27.3045 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec 16.4748 to 27.3045 deg
Loaded 14009 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8793 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 153605 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 80 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.c9NwamPd5l (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=46, blended=17705, bad_region=3, passed=151450
Got 151450 stars (including 133484 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151450 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4804 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4804 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4804 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=951 n_q2=1322 n_q3=1097 n_q4=1434 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.231
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.jBpTW5obl8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=67, blended=17785, bad_region=5, passed=153538
Got 153538 stars (including 135488 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153538 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4803 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=940 n_q2=1323 n_q3=1093 n_q4=1447 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.259
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.JlZQSz8SSl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1350, bad_region=1, passed=35263
Got 35263 stars (including 33860 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35263 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4839 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4796 stars left (next iteration limit 5275)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4796 robust_rms=4.494 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=96.160 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4796 robust_rms=0.576 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.950 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4796 robust_rms=0.481 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.692 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4796 robust_rms_before=0.915 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.454 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.481 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.596 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.692
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.596 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits N_match=4796 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.593 n_q1=1456 n_q2=636 n_q3=2189 n_q4=515 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.299
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.JPIJs1fa0c (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1333, bad_region=2, passed=34203
Got 34203 stars (including 32799 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34203 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4785 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4791 stars left (next iteration limit 5271)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4791 robust_rms=5.935 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=80.889 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4791 robust_rms=0.608 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.836 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4791 robust_rms=0.482 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.712 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4791 robust_rms_before=0.931 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.434 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.482 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.569 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.712
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.569 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits N_match=4791 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.561 n_q1=1263 n_q2=657 n_q3=2252 n_q4=619 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.277
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-46-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0498.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054941_TTUQ1b1x1_489084_cP2QgWZv/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:03:15.36 +20:34:09.3: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:02:52.58 +24:33:04.6: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:28.65 +23:40:18.2: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:30.03 +27:10:51.7: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:21:28.65 +23:40:18.2: 13.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:02:52.58 +24:33:04.6: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:03:15.36 +20:34:09.3: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:58:16.10 +22:23:14.9: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:13.85 +22:54:53.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:02:52.58 +24:33:04.6: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1763 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:03:15.36 +20:34:09.3: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5223 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:21:28.65 +23:40:18.2: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4480 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:30.03 +27:10:51.7: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:30.03 +27:10:51.7: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7744 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:13.85 +22:54:53.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:13.85 +22:54:53.3: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:58:16.10 +22:23:14.9: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:00:15.72 +23:59:33.9: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:11:27.17 +26:25:34.0: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:57:57.44 +22:31:30.5: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:54.81 +22:50:50.8: 10.73 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:00:15.72 +23:59:33.9: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:41:13.69 +20:25:07.8: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:11:27.17 +26:25:34.0: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:57:57.44 +22:31:30.5: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:27.17 +26:25:34.0: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4751 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:57:57.44 +22:31:30.5: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3304 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:54.81 +22:50:50.8: 10.74 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.74 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:54.81 +22:50:50.8: ref_mag=10.74 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.5237 delta=-1.79 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:41:13.69 +20:25:07.8: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:41:13.69 +20:25:07.8: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4209 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:54:23.02 +21:10:54.0: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:14:04.73 +24:55:42.7: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:54:23.02 +21:10:54.0: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:23.02 +21:10:54.0: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8973 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:01:37.29 +21:43:09.2: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:14:04.73 +24:55:42.7: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:20.32 +24:26:17.4: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:01:37.29 +21:43:09.2: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:09:27.14 +23:56:42.6: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:01:37.29 +21:43:09.2: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2040 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:39.60 +22:49:42.9: 12.84 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:29:20.32 +24:26:17.4: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:20.32 +24:26:17.4: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1613 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:26.77 +23:15:05.6: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:09:27.14 +23:56:42.6: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:27.14 +23:56:42.6: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3423 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:29.20 +22:51:12.0: 13.64 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:39.60 +22:49:42.9: 12.94 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:39.60 +22:49:42.9: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=13.4390 delta=-0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:08:26.77 +23:15:05.6: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:26.77 +23:15:05.6: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4298 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:29.20 +22:51:12.0: 13.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.34
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:29.20 +22:51:12.0: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.34 new_mean_mag=13.5905 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:08.35 +22:46:27.2: 13.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:08.35 +22:46:27.2: 13.59 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.33
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:08.35 +22:46:27.2: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.33 new_mean_mag=13.7897 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out175625.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out175807.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176265.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175440_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 175440_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175442_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 175442_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:04.60 +23:09:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175444_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 175444_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175451_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 175451_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:20.99 +24:30:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175456_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 175456_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:55.77 +26:10:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175463_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 175463_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:12.87 +20:54:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175464_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 175464_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175465_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 175465_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:05.71 +23:26:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175468_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 175468_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:04.79 +25:34:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175469_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 175469_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:18.76 +24:28:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175470_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 175470_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:05.32 +26:01:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175473_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 175473_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175474_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 175474_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:01.23 +25:15:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175477_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 175477_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:25.91 +25:46:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175478_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 175478_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:33.00 +24:41:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175488_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 175488_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:11.55 +22:11:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175490_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 175490_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:26.16 +20:27:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175492_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 175492_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:59.66 +26:50:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175494_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
Preparing report for the candidate 175494_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175625_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
Preparing report for the candidate 175625_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175654_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 175654_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.90 +22:56:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175665_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 175665_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:04.59 +22:51:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175762_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 175762_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175769_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 175769_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:19.22 +24:07:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175776_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 175776_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:12.54 +22:52:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175781_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 175781_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:25.14 +22:38:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175807_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
Preparing report for the candidate 175807_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175856_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 175856_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:57.36 +22:56:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175920_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 175920_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:10.61 +22:27:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175924_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 175924_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175936_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 175936_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:52.11 +26:07:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175956_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 175956_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175978_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 175978_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:15.11 +18:30:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175981_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 175981_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176020_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176020_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:37.39 +26:03:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176034_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176034_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176052_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176052_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:33.04 +22:42:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176068_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176068_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:40.81 +22:57:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176087_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176087_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:42.47 +21:18:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176092_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176092_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:22.79 +25:23:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176099_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176099_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:46.86 +22:42:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176115_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176115_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.33 +25:56:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176119_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176119_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:48.27 +24:16:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176131_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176131_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176148_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176148_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:20.47 +26:22:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176169_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176169_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:19.08 +25:55:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176180_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176180_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:23.09 +22:43:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176204_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176204_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:15.36 +21:47:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176210_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176210_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:54.01 +23:37:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176224_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176224_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:42.64 +23:41:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176233_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176233_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:00.12 +22:57:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176265_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
Preparing report for the candidate 176265_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176275_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176275_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:10.14 +22:52:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176276_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176276_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:45.79 +23:15:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176311_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176311_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:19.34 +22:04:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176378_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176378_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:45.86 +25:33:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176388_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176388_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176396_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176396_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:24.63 +22:49:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176412_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176412_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:45.87 +23:26:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176428_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176428_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:08.00 +21:35:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176441_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176441_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176444_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176444_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:02.89 +23:25:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176475_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176475_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.18 +22:57:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176476_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176476_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:48.99 +25:18:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176491_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176491_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.74 +22:49:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176516_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176516_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176526_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176526_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176542_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176542_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:48.12 +21:45:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176558_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176558_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:26.15 +22:50:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176566_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176566_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176593_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176593_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:11.09 +24:39:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176623_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176623_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176625_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176625_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.16 +22:51:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176656_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176656_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:45.47 +21:44:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176665_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176665_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176667_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176667_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:28.47 +23:06:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176669_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 176669_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.76 +22:50:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163920_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 163920_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:34.44 +24:13:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05956_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 05956_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:12.39 +26:47:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499
The candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_05-48-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499 did not pass the final checks
