This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 31.4115 2461283.9115 13.21 06:44:07.31 +18:09:47.4
195.88170 6.61232 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.712 Boliviana -1 -1 2 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:44:07.31 +18:09:47.4: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:44:07.31 +18:09:47.4: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461283.9115,13.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260831.4115 13.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 31.4115 2461283.9115 12.84 07:33:26.98 +17:01:47.8
202.02390 16.77795 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.202 Chryseis -0 1 1 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:33:26.98 +17:01:47.8: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:33:26.98 +17:01:47.8: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461283.9115,12.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260831.4115 12.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 31.4115 2461283.9115 13.36 07:06:27.60 +14:10:15.9
201.88245 9.68043 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.444 Gyptis -0 -1 1 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:06:27.60 +14:10:15.9: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:06:27.60 +14:10:15.9: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461283.9115,13.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260831.4115 13.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 31.4115 2461283.9115 13.49 07:09:31.71 +18:27:25.0
198.25567 12.17681 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.114 Kassandra -2 -1 2 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:09:31.71 +18:27:25.0: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:09:31.71 +18:27:25.0: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461283.9115,13.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260831.4115 13.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
First image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Last image: 2461283.91176781 31.08.2026 09:52:46.739 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.78
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 24701
Objects passed selection criteria: 24630
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 17602.5
Average stars matched: 17282.2 (98.1807 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 251776 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 31 04:54:48 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
First image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Last image: 2461283.91176781 31.08.2026 09:52:46.739 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 106
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 38 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 167210
Objects passed selection criteria: 166777
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 130350
Average stars matched: 127432 (97.7614 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 638800 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 31 04:56:17 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461283.91118778
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:35.595 +14:00:49.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:35.595 +14:00:49.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0265 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:35.149 +14:00:09.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:35.149 +14:00:09.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0275 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:35.595 +14:00:49.67
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:35.149 +14:00:09.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01120 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fUWmgdiute
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9qn8usNg8u
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nHamU4poB0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PuTJfuLDWo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec +8.4645 to +19.3418 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec 8.4645 to 19.3418 deg
Loaded 18986 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13831 out of 15584 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15584 out of 28861 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.907000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.907000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.78
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec +8.4645 to +19.3418 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec 8.4645 to 19.3418 deg
Loaded 18986 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13831 out of 15584 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15584 out of 28861 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 25465 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3404 to 114.8465 deg, Dec +8.5626 to +19.2813 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3404 to 114.8465 deg, Dec 8.5626 to 19.2813 deg
Loaded 18669 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13893 out of 14989 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14989 out of 25465 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.5 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
14.9 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.fUWmgdiute (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3379, bad_region=0, passed=28861
Got 28861 stars (including 25451 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4815 stars left (next iteration limit 5297)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=4815 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.572 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.369 n_q1=1312 n_q2=1159 n_q3=1286 n_q4=1058 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.9qn8usNg8u (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=7, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2216, bad_region=1, passed=25458
Got 25458 stars (including 23221 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25458 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4805 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 4805 stars left (next iteration limit 5284)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=4805 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.623 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.777 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.790 n_q1=963 n_q2=1380 n_q3=1031 n_q4=1431 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.268
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.nHamU4poB0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=554, bad_region=0, passed=8218
Got 8218 stars (including 7657 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8218 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4775 stars left (next iteration limit 5253)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4775 robust_rms=7.290 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.141 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4775 robust_rms=0.660 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.256 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4775 robust_rms=0.459 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.782 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4775 robust_rms_before=1.503 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.494 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.459 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.683 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.782
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.683 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits N_match=4775 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.633 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.525 n_q1=1527 n_q2=832 n_q3=1531 n_q4=885 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.299
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.PuTJfuLDWo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=559, bad_region=0, passed=8306
Got 8306 stars (including 7734 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8306 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4840 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8306 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8306 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8306 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4779 stars left (next iteration limit 5256)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=7.325 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.161 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=0.640 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.173 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=0.469 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.840 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4779 robust_rms_before=1.403 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.508 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.469 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.693 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.840
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.693 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits N_match=4779 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.661 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.542 n_q1=1520 n_q2=845 n_q3=1522 n_q4=892 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.321
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits sigma_overall=0.456 worst_q_ratio=1.254
ref2=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits sigma_overall=0.623 worst_q_ratio=1.268
new1=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits sigma_overall=0.487 worst_q_ratio=1.299
new2=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits sigma_overall=0.501 worst_q_ratio=1.321
reference average sigma_overall=0.5395 worst_q_ratio=1.261
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064_astrometric_residuals.png (4815 matched stars from wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034_astrometric_residuals.png (4805 matched stars from wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.57 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450_astrometric_residuals.png (4775 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451_astrometric_residuals.png (4779 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31125_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 31125_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:55.62 +12:58:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31137_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 31137_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:08.62 +10:45:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31232_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 31232_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:57.41 +13:56:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08602_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 08602_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:00.37 +11:44:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03781_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 03781_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:42.59 +10:01:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:35.595 +14:00:49.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:35.595 +14:00:49.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0265 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:35.149 +14:00:09.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:35.149 +14:00:09.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0275 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:35.595 +14:00:49.67
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:35.149 +14:00:09.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01120 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bkzahcYQ2i
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Wp5cfrXpTB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits &> /tmp/tmp.A7jQlMmb4k
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KHgx0v3PuN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec +8.4557 to +19.3457 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec 8.4557 to 19.3457 deg
Loaded 19038 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10463 out of 16396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16396 out of 208537 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.747800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.747800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec +8.4557 to +19.3457 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec 8.4557 to 19.3457 deg
Loaded 19038 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10463 out of 16396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16396 out of 208537 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 174030 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3404 to 114.8535 deg, Dec +8.5565 to +19.2859 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3404 to 114.8535 deg, Dec 8.5565 to 19.2859 deg
Loaded 18692 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11904 out of 16168 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16168 out of 174030 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 96 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
15.1 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.bkzahcYQ2i (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=64, blended=33805, bad_region=0, passed=208473
Got 208473 stars (including 174370 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 208473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4834 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 208473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4835 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 208473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 208473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4803 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=4803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.339 n_q1=1196 n_q2=1243 n_q3=1203 n_q4=1161 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Wp5cfrXpTB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=102, blended=23358, bad_region=2, passed=173928
Got 173928 stars (including 150412 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 173928 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 173928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4795 stars left (next iteration limit 5272)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=4795 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.729 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.784 n_q1=989 n_q2=1366 n_q3=1028 n_q4=1412 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.A7jQlMmb4k (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=3674, bad_region=1, passed=70500
Got 70500 stars (including 66737 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 70500 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4835 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4773 stars left (next iteration limit 5253)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=7.157 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.153 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=0.671 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.255 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=0.462 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.803 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4773 robust_rms_before=1.497 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.478 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.462 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.681 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.803
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.681 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits N_match=4773 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.621 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.513 n_q1=1534 n_q2=832 n_q3=1502 n_q4=905 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.317
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.KHgx0v3PuN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=3630, bad_region=1, passed=71064
Got 71064 stars (including 67339 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71064 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4833 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4833 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4779 stars left (next iteration limit 5256)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=7.286 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.420 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=0.643 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.160 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=0.468 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.833 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4779 robust_rms_before=1.407 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.491 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.468 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.694 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.833
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.694 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits N_match=4779 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.666 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.546 n_q1=1539 n_q2=834 n_q3=1506 n_q4=900 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.367
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-51-56_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_045323_TTUQ1b1x1_2785686_CXXeRDya/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:48:07.87 +09:53:00.3: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:02:17.66 +16:58:24.7: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:49:23.41 +10:58:27.7: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:11:21.20 +15:19:09.0: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:20:02.07 +16:15:56.4: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:30:28.23 +16:15:49.7: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:02:17.66 +16:58:24.7: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:48:07.87 +09:53:00.3: 12.77 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:02:17.66 +16:58:24.7: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2687 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:49:23.41 +10:58:27.7: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:48:07.87 +09:53:00.3: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9177 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:49:23.41 +10:58:27.7: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8472 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:20:02.07 +16:15:56.4: 12.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:02.07 +16:15:56.4: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2935 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:11:21.20 +15:19:09.0: 12.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:21.20 +15:19:09.0: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6861 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:30:28.23 +16:15:49.7: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:28.23 +16:15:49.7: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4224 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:16:40.75 +16:09:06.6: 11.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:16:40.75 +16:09:06.6: 11.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.22 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:40.75 +16:09:06.6: ref_mag=11.22 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2011 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:58:17.10 +14:15:29.6: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:01:43.22 +17:59:11.9: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:58:17.10 +14:15:29.6: 12.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:58:17.10 +14:15:29.6: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2353 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:39:04.18 +16:16:49.9: 13.06 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:20:07.51 +16:09:33.6: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:01:43.22 +17:59:11.9: 12.73 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:01:43.22 +17:59:11.9: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6413 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:25:03.05 +16:23:45.7: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:16:38.50 +16:09:35.4: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:39:04.18 +16:16:49.9: 13.36 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:20:07.51 +16:09:33.6: 12.62 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:39:04.18 +16:16:49.9: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0682 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:07.51 +16:09:33.6: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5991 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:35:55.63 +14:11:48.3: 13.05 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:25:03.05 +16:23:45.7: 12.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:03.05 +16:23:45.7: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3168 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:16:38.50 +16:09:35.4: 12.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:38.50 +16:09:35.4: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6598 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:39:36.62 +11:24:50.9: 12.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:35:55.63 +14:11:48.3: 13.20 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:35:55.63 +14:11:48.3: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0627 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:39:36.62 +11:24:50.9: 12.94 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:39:36.62 +11:24:50.9: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0503 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:44:07.31 +18:09:47.4: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:53:47.52 +15:35:46.1: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:49:54.79 +10:51:47.6: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:44:07.31 +18:09:47.4: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:53:47.52 +15:35:46.1: 13.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:53:47.52 +15:35:46.1: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0957 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:49:54.79 +10:51:47.6: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:49:54.79 +10:51:47.6: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1212 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:49:39.97 +13:12:36.6: 13.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:33:26.98 +17:01:47.8: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:06:27.60 +14:10:15.9: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:09:31.71 +18:27:25.0: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:49:39.97 +13:12:36.6: 13.11 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:49:39.97 +13:12:36.6: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1777 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:33:26.98 +17:01:47.8: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:06:27.60 +14:10:15.9: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:09:31.71 +18:27:25.0: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out229102.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out229512.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out229788.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out229843.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227471_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 227471_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227473_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 227473_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:09.32 +17:52:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227485_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 227485_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:01.95 +11:00:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227492_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 227492_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:25.68 +09:15:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227493_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 227493_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:35.88 +10:34:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227496_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 227496_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:08.38 +14:46:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227502_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 227502_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227505_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 227505_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:22.48 +10:37:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227506_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 227506_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:30.79 +09:22:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227507_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 227507_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227511_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 227511_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227514_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 227514_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:28.20 +18:45:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227515_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 227515_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227516_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 227516_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227519_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 227519_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:09.42 +12:21:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227521_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 227521_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:13.64 +18:41:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227523_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 227523_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:44.12 +16:43:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227525_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 227525_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:11.05 +18:24:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227528_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 227528_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:38.65 +19:12:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227530_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 227530_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:10.61 +12:35:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227531_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 227531_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:50.37 +17:58:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227804_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 227804_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:09.80 +16:09:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227884_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 227884_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:56.15 +13:15:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227888_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 227888_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227950_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 227950_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:18.80 +17:37:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228031_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 228031_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:25.71 +16:11:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228164_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 228164_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:33.49 +12:07:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228270_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 228270_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:59.40 +09:55:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228311_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 228311_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:30.76 +16:25:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228312_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 228312_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228367_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 228367_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:04.40 +09:51:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228397_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 228397_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:01.57 +14:10:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228417_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 228417_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:56.03 +16:27:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228463_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 228463_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:08.06 +16:04:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228499_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 228499_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:50.28 +10:37:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228539_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 228539_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:40.71 +16:56:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228546_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 228546_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:55.56 +17:12:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228620_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 228620_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:13.01 +15:07:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228649_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 228649_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228663_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 228663_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:58.12 +13:45:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228664_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 228664_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:02.91 +09:18:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228678_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 228678_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:50.05 +12:33:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228686_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 228686_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:27.63 +12:51:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228692_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 228692_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:37.65 +10:34:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228776_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 228776_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:19.31 +13:20:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228793_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 228793_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:14.53 +10:36:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228820_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 228820_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228828_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 228828_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228830_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 228830_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:06.39 +18:39:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228836_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 228836_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:48.12 +10:42:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228842_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 228842_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228846_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 228846_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:59.97 +14:14:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228891_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 228891_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228894_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 228894_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:36.44 +16:33:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228918_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 228918_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:35.11 +11:24:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228954_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 228954_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:17.26 +09:01:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228961_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 228961_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:16.54 +15:18:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228989_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 228989_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229011_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 229011_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:31.29 +10:12:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229029_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 229029_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:29.16 +12:08:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229039_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 229039_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229053_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 229053_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:33.34 +17:27:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229061_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 229061_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:50.76 +16:55:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229084_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 229084_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:09.42 +14:14:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229094_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 229094_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:05.27 +16:42:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229102_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
Preparing report for the candidate 229102_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229121_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 229121_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:23.68 +15:19:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229139_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 229139_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:27.99 +16:25:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229153_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 229153_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229234_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 229234_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:19.59 +15:47:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229239_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 229239_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229244_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 229244_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:51.10 +12:40:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229246_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 229246_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:47.01 +09:46:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229252_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 229252_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:51.68 +09:15:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229290_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 229290_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:57.01 +14:13:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229292_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 229292_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:47.52 +10:59:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229308_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 229308_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:11.03 +17:50:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229366_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 229366_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229426_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 229426_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:14.65 +15:48:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229512_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
Preparing report for the candidate 229512_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229589_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 229589_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:23.01 +12:01:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229662_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 229662_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:53.97 +12:25:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229717_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 229717_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:49.27 +09:36:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229788_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
Preparing report for the candidate 229788_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229843_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
Preparing report for the candidate 229843_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68285_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 68285_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:49.94 +12:12:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58482_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 58482_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:00.39 +11:44:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51429_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 51429_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:44.20 +11:24:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224191_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 224191_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221042_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 221042_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:29.65 +13:18:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26007_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 26007_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:57.23 +09:50:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190647_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 190647_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:33.20 +16:51:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41021_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 41021_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:08.63 +10:45:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89197_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 89197_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:55.63 +12:58:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106125_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 106125_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:57.43 +13:56:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27049_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 27049_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-52-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks