This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461283.9095,6.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260831.4095 6.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 31.4095 2461283.9095 11.06 06:55:52.83 +22:26:03.1
193.20017 10.95038 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.27 Euterpe -0 -0 0 11.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:55:52.83 +22:26:03.1: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:55:52.83 +22:26:03.1: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461283.9095,11.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260831.4095 11.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461283.9095,7.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260831.4095 7.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 31.4095 2461283.9095 12.02 06:58:10.48 +24:02:36.8
191.93394 12.10298 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.30 Urania -0 -0 0 12.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:58:10.48 +24:02:36.8: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:58:10.48 +24:02:36.8: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461283.9095,12.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260831.4095 12.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 31.4095 2461283.9095 13.01 07:33:26.81 +17:01:46.6
202.02393 16.77719 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 9.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.202 Chryseis -0 -1 1 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:33:26.81 +17:01:46.6: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:33:26.81 +17:01:46.6: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461283.9095,13.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260831.4095 13.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 31.4095 2461283.9095 13.15 07:12:06.01 +24:59:34.6
192.35853 15.38371 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 9.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.111 Ate 1 1 1 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:12:06.01 +24:59:34.6: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:12:06.01 +24:59:34.6: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461283.9095,13.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260831.4095 13.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 31.4095 2461283.9095 13.01 07:42:25.06 +22:04:17.7
197.99058 20.68899 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.6" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.521 Brixia 1 1 2 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:42:25.06 +22:04:17.7: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:42:25.06 +22:04:17.7: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461283.9095,13.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260831.4095 13.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461283.90988960 31.08.2026 09:50:04.461 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22048
Objects passed selection criteria: 21920
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 14950.2
Average stars matched: 14567.5 (97.4398 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 246724 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 31 04:53:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461283.90988960 31.08.2026 09:50:04.461 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 138
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 29 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 139900
Objects passed selection criteria: 139453
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 101517
Average stars matched: 97649.2 (96.1903 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 605144 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 31 04:55:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461283.90919611
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:00.056 +21:59:48.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:00.056 +21:59:48.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0150 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:57.537 +22:00:28.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:22:57.537 +22:00:28.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0257 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:00.056 +21:59:48.21
Second-epoch second image center 07:22:57.537 +22:00:28.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01493 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NzdM8t9c2w
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3hojYgR3m2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ByuMBknXus
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RGdFBtiOtf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.929600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.929600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4801 to +27.2943 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4801 to 27.2943 deg
Loaded 13972 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10626 out of 11736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11736 out of 23398 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.NzdM8t9c2w (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, bad_region=1, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 21361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4811 stars left (next iteration limit 5292)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4811 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.341 n_q1=904 n_q2=1356 n_q3=1059 n_q4=1492 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.183
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.3hojYgR3m2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2268, bad_region=1, passed=23398
Got 23398 stars (including 21095 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4806 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4806 stars left (next iteration limit 5285)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4806 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.377 n_q1=895 n_q2=1351 n_q3=1061 n_q4=1499 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ByuMBknXus (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=467, bad_region=0, passed=6552
Got 6552 stars (including 6074 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6552 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4848 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6549 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4807 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6549 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4807 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6549 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4807 stars left (next iteration limit 5281)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4807 robust_rms=7.097 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=20.267 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4807 robust_rms=0.540 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.691 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4807 robust_rms=0.410 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.545 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4807 robust_rms_before=1.411 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.401 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.410 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.561 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.545
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.561 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits N_match=4807 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.390 n_q1=1601 n_q2=860 n_q3=1510 n_q4=836 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.262
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.RGdFBtiOtf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=460, bad_region=0, passed=6588
Got 6588 stars (including 6121 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6588 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4846 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4801 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4808 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4808 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4808 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4808 robust_rms=7.179 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=20.674 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4808 robust_rms=0.550 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.679 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4808 robust_rms=0.413 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.601 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4808 robust_rms_before=1.388 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.401 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.413 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.552 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.601
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.552 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits N_match=4808 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=1600 n_q2=863 n_q3=1507 n_q4=838 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.273
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits sigma_overall=0.387 worst_q_ratio=1.183
ref2=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits sigma_overall=0.426 worst_q_ratio=1.279
new1=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits sigma_overall=0.404 worst_q_ratio=1.262
new2=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits sigma_overall=0.406 worst_q_ratio=1.273
reference average sigma_overall=0.4065 worst_q_ratio=1.231
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153_astrometric_residuals.png (4811 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154_astrometric_residuals.png (4806 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448_astrometric_residuals.png (4807 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449_astrometric_residuals.png (4808 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:42.82 +22:54:43.2: 10.03 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:09.81 +22:47:45.0: 10.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:35.38 +22:51:40.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:55:52.83 +22:26:03.1: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:42.82 +22:54:43.2: 10.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:35.38 +22:51:40.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:35.38 +22:51:40.0: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:09.81 +22:47:45.0: 10.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:55:52.83 +22:26:03.1: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:42.82 +22:54:43.2: ref_mag=10.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=10.5605 delta=-0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.82 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:09.81 +22:47:45.0: ref_mag=10.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.0926 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31462.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31357_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 31357_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31373_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 31373_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31380_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 31380_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.09 +25:59:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31425_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 31425_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31448_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 31448_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:31.03 +20:02:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31462_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 31462_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31469_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 31469_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31487_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 31487_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:34.39 +24:13:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
06:55:52.83 +22:26:03.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:00.056 +21:59:48.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:00.056 +21:59:48.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0150 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:57.537 +22:00:28.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:22:57.537 +22:00:28.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0257 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:00.056 +21:59:48.21
Second-epoch second image center 07:22:57.537 +22:00:28.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01493 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jAGLSe4LeZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6OjO3qyhXw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ae32ckzqWq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wsBaRh1tqM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.796750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.796750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 153605 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec +16.4748 to +27.3045 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec 16.4748 to 27.3045 deg
Loaded 14009 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8793 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 153605 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 136 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.jAGLSe4LeZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=46, blended=17705, bad_region=3, passed=151450
Got 151450 stars (including 133484 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151450 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4804 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4804 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4804 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=951 n_q2=1322 n_q3=1097 n_q4=1434 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.231
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.6OjO3qyhXw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=67, blended=17785, bad_region=5, passed=153538
Got 153538 stars (including 135488 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153538 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4803 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=940 n_q2=1323 n_q3=1093 n_q4=1447 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.259
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Ae32ckzqWq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2073, bad_region=2, passed=51681
Got 51681 stars (including 49531 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51681 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51674 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4839 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51675 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51675 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4801 stars left (next iteration limit 5277)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4801 robust_rms=7.053 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=20.556 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4801 robust_rms=0.540 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.695 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4801 robust_rms=0.408 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.545 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4801 robust_rms_before=1.412 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.385 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.408 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.536 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.545
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.536 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits N_match=4801 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.390 n_q1=1586 n_q2=844 n_q3=1525 n_q4=846 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.267
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.wsBaRh1tqM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=2075, bad_region=2, passed=51883
Got 51883 stars (including 49723 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51883 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4802 stars left (next iteration limit 5276)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4802 robust_rms=7.231 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=19.032 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4802 robust_rms=0.555 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.674 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4802 robust_rms=0.411 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.603 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4802 robust_rms_before=1.393 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.391 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.411 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.542 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.603
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.542 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits N_match=4802 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=1568 n_q2=850 n_q3=1529 n_q4=855 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-49-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_045038_TTUQ1b1x1_2660243_jo0JmqvK/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:59:10.32 +21:04:14.4: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:25.97 +20:54:37.3: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:01.31 +19:41:49.1: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:29.98 +27:10:52.5: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:59:10.32 +21:04:14.4: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:59:10.32 +21:04:14.4: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6625 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:25.97 +20:54:37.3: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:25.97 +20:54:37.3: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1565 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:01.31 +19:41:49.1: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:01.31 +19:41:49.1: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6740 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:29.98 +27:10:52.5: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:29.98 +27:10:52.5: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7521 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:58:10.48 +24:02:36.8: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:13.86 +22:54:53.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:58:10.48 +24:02:36.8: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:57:57.59 +22:31:30.4: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:13.86 +22:54:53.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:13.86 +22:54:53.4: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:11:27.16 +26:25:33.3: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:54.86 +22:50:51.0: 10.72 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:57:57.59 +22:31:30.4: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:57:57.59 +22:31:30.4: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3810 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:11:27.16 +26:25:33.3: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:54.86 +22:50:51.0: 10.73 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.72 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:27.16 +26:25:33.3: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3618 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:54.86 +22:50:51.0: ref_mag=10.72 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.4665 delta=-1.74 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:35.11 +19:24:26.8: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:54:23.04 +21:10:54.3: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:41:13.44 +20:25:08.2: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:35.11 +19:24:26.8: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:01:42.88 +17:59:13.6: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:35.11 +19:24:26.8: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4760 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:54:23.04 +21:10:54.3: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:23.04 +21:10:54.3: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8628 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:41:13.44 +20:25:08.2: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:41:13.44 +20:25:08.2: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3810 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:01:42.88 +17:59:13.6: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:01:42.88 +17:59:13.6: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7318 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:28:41.71 +24:40:35.6: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:03:22.70 +23:10:35.9: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:03:30.76 +25:20:59.4: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:01:37.27 +21:43:09.3: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:28:41.71 +24:40:35.6: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:51:34.34 +20:56:52.7: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:28:41.71 +24:40:35.6: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8330 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:03:22.70 +23:10:35.9: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:03:22.70 +23:10:35.9: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0961 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:29.99 +20:30:42.3: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:03:30.76 +25:20:59.4: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:03:30.76 +25:20:59.4: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0447 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:01:37.27 +21:43:09.3: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:01:37.27 +21:43:09.3: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0295 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:51:34.34 +20:56:52.7: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:51:34.34 +20:56:52.7: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1290 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:29.99 +20:30:42.3: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:29.99 +20:30:42.3: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9993 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:42:45.11 +24:08:02.7: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:42:45.11 +24:08:02.7: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:42:45.11 +24:08:02.7: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8204 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:39.61 +22:49:43.4: 12.85 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:33:26.81 +17:01:46.6: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:27:01.20 +23:55:51.3: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:12:06.01 +24:59:34.6: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:19:48.83 +19:43:14.8: 13.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:39.61 +22:49:43.4: 12.94 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:39.61 +22:49:43.4: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=13.2760 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:33:26.81 +17:01:46.6: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:27:01.20 +23:55:51.3: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:27:01.20 +23:55:51.3: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9933 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:00:51.02 +23:44:09.5: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:12:06.01 +24:59:34.6: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:19:48.83 +19:43:14.8: 13.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:48.83 +19:43:14.8: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1404 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:29.25 +22:51:11.3: 13.65 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:20.32 +24:26:16.9: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:00:51.02 +23:44:09.5: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:00:51.02 +23:44:09.5: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3956 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:29.25 +22:51:11.3: 13.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.34
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:29.25 +22:51:11.3: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.34 new_mean_mag=13.4895 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:29:20.32 +24:26:16.9: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:20.32 +24:26:16.9: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2297 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:42:25.06 +22:04:17.7: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:42:25.06 +22:04:17.7: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out175746.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176443.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176496.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out67953.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175435_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175435_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:46.26 +23:00:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175439_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175439_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175442_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175442_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:38.74 +20:22:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175444_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175444_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:44.59 +20:07:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175449_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175449_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:49.34 +19:58:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175455_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175455_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175456_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175456_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:44.27 +19:19:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175457_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175457_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:49.67 +26:09:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175458_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175458_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:25.12 +24:28:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175459_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175459_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:41.03 +21:56:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175463_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175463_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175468_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175468_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:51.49 +18:23:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175469_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175469_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:12.87 +20:54:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175470_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175470_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:14.98 +18:59:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175471_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175471_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:55.82 +26:10:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175472_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175472_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:08.52 +17:49:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175474_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175474_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:05.35 +26:01:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175475_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175475_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:28.46 +21:02:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175476_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175476_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:53.94 +20:45:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175477_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175477_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:32.95 +24:41:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175479_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175479_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175480_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175480_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:01.24 +25:15:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175481_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175481_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:06.87 +20:04:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175484_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175484_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:18.73 +24:28:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175485_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175485_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175488_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175488_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:20.35 +27:06:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175490_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175490_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:11.56 +22:11:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175491_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175491_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:01.14 +20:23:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175494_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175494_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:19.28 +22:46:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175496_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175496_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:27.77 +19:32:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175497_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175497_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:49.34 +26:56:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175500_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175500_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:59.72 +26:50:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175501_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 175501_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175648_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175648_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.92 +22:56:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175690_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175690_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:04.59 +22:51:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175709_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175709_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:10.77 +19:57:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175733_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175733_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:38.67 +19:12:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175746_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 175746_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175755_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175755_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:12.54 +22:52:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175756_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175756_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175780_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175780_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:19.23 +24:07:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175789_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175789_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:49.38 +19:28:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175798_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175798_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:25.17 +22:38:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175864_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175864_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:57.67 +25:46:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175883_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175883_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175888_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175888_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:52.12 +26:07:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175892_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175892_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:57.41 +22:56:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175899_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175899_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175913_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175913_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:40.96 +19:13:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175966_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175966_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:10.65 +22:27:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175969_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 175969_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176002_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176002_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:48.80 +19:51:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176005_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176005_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:48.08 +17:59:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176028_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176028_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:54.09 +23:37:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176030_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176030_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:15.02 +18:30:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176036_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176036_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:18.02 +24:27:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176041_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176041_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:53.93 +20:58:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176045_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176045_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.36 +25:56:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176050_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176050_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:33.03 +22:42:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176060_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176060_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:01.18 +26:51:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176062_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176062_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:02.97 +23:02:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176066_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176066_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:48.55 +20:26:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176082_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176082_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:22.78 +25:23:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176088_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176088_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:37.35 +26:03:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176095_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176095_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:40.82 +22:57:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176110_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176110_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176115_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176115_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:14.48 +22:23:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176120_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176120_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176123_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176123_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:02.75 +23:25:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176132_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176132_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:51.04 +23:51:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176133_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176133_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:49.51 +25:29:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176137_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176137_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:19.07 +25:55:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176140_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176140_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176152_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176152_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:06.40 +18:39:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176153_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176153_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:20.50 +26:22:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176161_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176161_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176167_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176167_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:26.82 +20:36:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176168_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176168_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:57.54 +20:28:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176170_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176170_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:46.78 +23:15:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176184_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176184_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:37.07 +17:45:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176187_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176187_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:42.40 +21:18:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176195_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176195_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:42.13 +22:10:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176207_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176207_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:48.16 +24:16:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176208_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176208_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:23.11 +22:43:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176212_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176212_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:08.76 +23:56:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176224_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176224_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:13.17 +18:03:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176232_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176232_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176246_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176246_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176252_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176252_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:50.83 +18:51:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176254_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176254_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176257_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176257_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:46.92 +22:42:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176258_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176258_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:45.86 +25:33:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176283_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176283_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:30.84 +25:55:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176290_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176290_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:45.85 +23:15:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176291_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176291_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176293_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176293_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176299_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176299_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176305_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176305_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:15.35 +21:47:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176323_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176323_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:13.66 +24:40:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176343_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176343_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:00.16 +22:57:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176346_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176346_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:22.39 +20:30:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176350_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176350_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.30 +24:32:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176359_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176359_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176374_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176374_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:10.19 +22:52:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176393_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176393_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:45.88 +23:26:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176399_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176399_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:39.31 +26:48:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176405_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176405_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:07.99 +21:35:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176408_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176408_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.82 +22:49:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176417_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176417_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.07 +20:06:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176419_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176419_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176427_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176427_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:27.72 +22:58:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176435_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176435_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:49.03 +25:18:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176443_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 176443_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176475_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176475_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:11.04 +24:39:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176490_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176490_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176494_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176494_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:00.33 +20:48:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176496_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 176496_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176506_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176506_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.16 +22:57:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176513_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176513_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:55.37 +21:31:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176525_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176525_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176531_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176531_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:49.61 +26:19:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176534_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176534_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:24.53 +22:49:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176543_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176543_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176554_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176554_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.46 +20:05:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176572_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176572_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:48.53 +21:56:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176609_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176609_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176650_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176650_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176653_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176653_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:19.00 +22:52:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176679_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 176679_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.74 +22:50:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67953_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 67953_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63541_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 63541_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:52.83 +22:26:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05956_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 05956_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:12.39 +26:47:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.09 +25:59:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163920_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 163920_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:34.46 +24:13:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106224_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 106224_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:11.67 +19:32:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100568_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 100568_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_04-50-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
