This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 29.1671 2461281.6671 9.57 20:06:36.10 -24:26:15.8
17.71327 -26.72049 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 4.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.324 Bamberga 1 1 2 9.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:06:36.10 -24:26:15.8: 14.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:06:36.10 -24:26:15.8: 14.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461281.6671,9.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260829.1671 9.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 29.1671 2461281.6671 13.01 20:25:46.05 -25:33:33.2
18.06987 -31.19437 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 4.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.388 Charybdis -1 -1 1 13.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:25:46.05 -25:33:33.2: 14.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:25:46.05 -25:33:33.2: 14.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 29.1671* 20 25 46.05 -25 33 33.2 13.0 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461281.6671,13.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260829.1671 13.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 29.1671 2461281.6671 13.49 20:35:40.12 -21:16:31.2
23.68553 -31.98923 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 4.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.462 Eriphyla -1 1 1 13.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:35:40.12 -21:16:31.2: 14.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:35:40.12 -21:16:31.2: 14.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 29.1671* 20 35 40.12 -21 16 31.2 13.5 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461281.6671,13.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260829.1671 13.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461229.82627380 08.07.2026 07:49:40.056 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
First image: 2461229.82627380 08.07.2026 07:49:40.056 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Last image: 2461281.66732318 29.08.2026 04:00:46.723 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.31
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5751
Objects passed selection criteria: 5746
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5152
Average stars matched: 4970.5 (96.4771 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232204 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Aug 28 23:07:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461229.82627380 08.07.2026 07:49:40.056 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
First image: 2461229.82627380 08.07.2026 07:49:40.056 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Last image: 2461281.66732318 29.08.2026 04:00:46.723 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 74
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 12 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 47935
Objects passed selection criteria: 47843
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 41817
Average stars matched: 39871.2 (95.347 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 269176 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Aug 28 23:10:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461281.66679200
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:36.749 -25:59:53.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:58.743 -25:59:38.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:36.749 -25:59:53.37
Second-epoch image center 20:09:58.743 -25:59:38.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0825 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:57.082 -25:59:52.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:36.749 -25:59:53.37
Second-epoch image center 20:09:57.082 -25:59:52.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0761 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:09:58.743 -25:59:38.20
Second-epoch second image center 20:09:57.082 -25:59:52.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00744 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yNhxs4SYc8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fI0vSstHZh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fdyhRAOlG4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IlB9tRYDob
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5807 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3718 to 311.4457 deg, Dec -31.2594 to -20.5684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3718 to 311.4457 deg, Dec -31.2594 to -20.5684 deg
Loaded 9413 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4837 out of 4937 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4937 out of 5807 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.364800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.364800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.31
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.05
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.05
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5807 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3718 to 311.4457 deg, Dec -31.2594 to -20.5684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3718 to 311.4457 deg, Dec -31.2594 to -20.5684 deg
Loaded 9413 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4837 out of 4937 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4937 out of 5807 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 6163 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3742 to 311.4456 deg, Dec -31.2699 to -20.5799 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3742 to 311.4456 deg, Dec -31.2699 to -20.5799 deg
Loaded 9413 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5072 out of 5182 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5182 out of 6163 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
2.3 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
2.8 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
2.8 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.1 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
14.1 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.yNhxs4SYc8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=383, bad_region=0, passed=5807
Got 5807 stars (including 5421 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5807 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4910 stars left (next iteration limit 5401)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=4910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.419 n_q1=1316 n_q2=1090 n_q3=1311 n_q4=1193 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.182
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.fI0vSstHZh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=423, bad_region=0, passed=6163
Got 6163 stars (including 5735 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6163 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5396)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.402 n_q1=1330 n_q2=1056 n_q3=1323 n_q4=1197 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.202
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.fdyhRAOlG4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=300, bad_region=0, passed=4365
Got 4365 stars (including 4063 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4365 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3992 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4365 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3994 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4365 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4365 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 3979 stars left (next iteration limit 4372)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3979 robust_rms=10.617 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.020 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3979 robust_rms=0.449 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.477 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3979 robust_rms=0.353 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.418 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3979 robust_rms_before=0.924 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.366 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.353 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.422 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.418
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.422 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits N_match=3979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=1124 n_q2=871 n_q3=1094 n_q4=890 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.123
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.IlB9tRYDob (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=304, bad_region=0, passed=4374
Got 4374 stars (including 4065 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3989 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3978 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3990 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 3979 stars left (next iteration limit 4375)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3979 robust_rms=10.561 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.786 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3979 robust_rms=0.428 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.459 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3979 robust_rms=0.343 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.406 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3979 robust_rms_before=0.921 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.359 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.343 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.433 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.406
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.433 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits N_match=3979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=1132 n_q2=855 n_q3=1091 n_q4=901 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.170
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits sigma_overall=0.435 worst_q_ratio=1.182
ref2=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits sigma_overall=0.427 worst_q_ratio=1.202
new1=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits sigma_overall=0.357 worst_q_ratio=1.123
new2=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits sigma_overall=0.359 worst_q_ratio=1.170
reference average sigma_overall=0.431 worst_q_ratio=1.192
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156_astrometric_residuals.png (4910 matched stars from wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205_astrometric_residuals.png (4906 matched stars from wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114_astrometric_residuals.png (3979 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115_astrometric_residuals.png (3979 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:25:37.09 -24:27:45.4: 11.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:06:36.10 -24:26:15.8: 14.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:06:36.10 -24:26:15.8: 14.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:25:37.09 -24:27:45.4: 11.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:37.09 -24:27:45.4: ref_mag=11.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8184 delta=0.66 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20580.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20580_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
Preparing report for the candidate 20580_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20633_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 20633_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:19.67 -23:55:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20670_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 20670_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05404_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 05404_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:30.33 -22:16:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:06:36.10 -24:26:15.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:36.749 -25:59:53.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:58.743 -25:59:38.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:36.749 -25:59:53.37
Second-epoch image center 20:09:58.743 -25:59:38.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0825 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:57.082 -25:59:52.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:36.749 -25:59:53.37
Second-epoch image center 20:09:57.082 -25:59:52.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0761 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:09:58.743 -25:59:38.20
Second-epoch second image center 20:09:57.082 -25:59:52.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00744 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aHuxnxhimB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Zi6p3kke3l
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits &> /tmp/tmp.99qx5kWZyJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits &> /tmp/tmp.J39yq1mcWM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 49567 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3398 to 311.4646 deg, Dec -31.2669 to -20.5506 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3398 to 311.4646 deg, Dec -31.2669 to -20.5506 deg
Loaded 9468 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7598 out of 8155 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8155 out of 49567 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.169250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.169250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.19
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.19
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 49567 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3398 to 311.4646 deg, Dec -31.2669 to -20.5506 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3398 to 311.4646 deg, Dec -31.2669 to -20.5506 deg
Loaded 9468 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7598 out of 8155 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8155 out of 49567 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 52342 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3394 to 311.4652 deg, Dec -31.2712 to -20.5387 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3394 to 311.4652 deg, Dec -31.2712 to -20.5387 deg
Loaded 9484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7577 out of 8158 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8158 out of 52342 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 69 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
2.1 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
2.6 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
14.3 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 13.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.aHuxnxhimB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2048, bad_region=0, passed=49554
Got 49554 stars (including 47427 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 49554 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49554 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49554 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49554 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4907 stars left (next iteration limit 5397)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=4907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.422 n_q1=1344 n_q2=1159 n_q3=1185 n_q4=1219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.174
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Zi6p3kke3l (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=2212, bad_region=1, passed=52328
Got 52328 stars (including 50038 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52328 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52328 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52328 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52328 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4908 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits N_match=4908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.410 n_q1=1364 n_q2=1130 n_q3=1195 n_q4=1219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.228
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.99qx5kWZyJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=977, bad_region=0, passed=33189
Got 33189 stars (including 32167 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33189 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33189 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33189 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33189 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5386)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=10.276 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.907 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=0.455 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.480 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=0.362 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.419 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4898 robust_rms_before=0.926 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.360 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.362 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.431 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.419
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.431 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=1257 n_q2=1019 n_q3=1448 n_q4=1174 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.156
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.J39yq1mcWM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=984, bad_region=0, passed=33369
Got 33369 stars (including 32331 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33369 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33369 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33369 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33369 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5390)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4900 robust_rms=10.339 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.129 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4900 robust_rms=0.441 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.462 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4900 robust_rms=0.350 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.416 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4900 robust_rms_before=0.920 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.356 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.350 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.453 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.416
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.453 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=1272 n_q2=1010 n_q3=1438 n_q4=1180 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.188
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-00_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_230435_TTUQ1b1x1_59760_cDCREjBA/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:53:05.38 -21:55:25.6: 12.94 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:02:09.10 -23:56:10.3: 12.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:47:00.11 -22:22:56.5: 12.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:40:29.31 -21:32:07.5: 12.50 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:05:21.49 -23:09:10.6: 11.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:48:25.02 -24:25:21.6: 12.70 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:28:28.64 -24:45:07.0: 12.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:55:53.04 -24:26:23.0: 13.52 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:41:19.86 -22:32:01.8: 12.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:55:06.87 -24:55:50.9: 12.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:48:25.02 -24:25:21.6: 12.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:47:00.11 -22:22:56.5: 12.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:28:28.64 -24:45:07.0: 12.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:55:06.87 -24:55:50.9: 12.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:41:19.86 -22:32:01.8: 12.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:05:21.49 -23:09:10.6: 11.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:55:53.04 -24:26:23.0: 13.59 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:02:09.10 -23:56:10.3: 12.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:53:05.38 -21:55:25.6: 12.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:40:29.31 -21:32:07.5: 12.55 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:28.64 -24:45:07.0: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4823 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:00.11 -22:22:56.5: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8617 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:06.87 -24:55:50.9: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0562 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:48:25.02 -24:25:21.6: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9112 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.76 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:05:21.49 -23:09:10.6: ref_mag=11.76 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0208 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:53.04 -24:26:23.0: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.3770 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:05.38 -21:55:25.6: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3192 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:19.86 -22:32:01.8: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4497 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:29.31 -21:32:07.5: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9634 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:02:09.10 -23:56:10.3: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1763 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:50:14.89 -22:46:11.7: 11.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:56:05.17 -29:11:27.4: 11.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:41:52.15 -20:50:40.7: 10.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:59:04.79 -23:20:22.9: 11.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:52:40.73 -26:50:27.6: 12.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:43:39.05 -21:56:14.5: 12.44 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:48:39.47 -21:09:33.3: 12.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:59:04.79 -23:20:22.9: 11.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:41:52.15 -20:50:40.7: 10.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:56:05.17 -29:11:27.4: 11.63 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:59:04.79 -23:20:22.9: ref_mag=11.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9287 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:50:14.89 -22:46:11.7: 11.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:52.15 -20:50:40.7: ref_mag=10.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.3131 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:05.17 -29:11:27.4: ref_mag=11.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7066 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:50:14.89 -22:46:11.7: ref_mag=11.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8742 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:36:46.63 -25:37:52.4: 12.67 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:47:08.47 -23:43:17.3: 12.68 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:43:39.05 -21:56:14.5: 12.49 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:52:40.73 -26:50:27.6: 12.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:48:39.47 -21:09:33.3: 12.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:39.05 -21:56:14.5: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6478 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:40.73 -26:50:27.6: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2453 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:48:39.47 -21:09:33.3: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9622 delta=-0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:36:46.63 -25:37:52.4: 12.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:46.63 -25:37:52.4: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7371 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:47:08.47 -23:43:17.3: 12.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:08.47 -23:43:17.3: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8506 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:00:58.65 -26:13:48.7: 12.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:55:04.98 -24:24:04.3: 12.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:54:54.74 -24:34:00.1: 13.02 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:02:50.33 -27:42:46.0: 12.52 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:38:17.30 -21:00:00.7: 13.75 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:25:46.05 -25:33:33.2: 14.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:06:10.34 -21:55:28.9: 13.16 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:35:40.12 -21:16:31.2: 14.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:00:58.65 -26:13:48.7: 13.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:00:58.65 -26:13:48.7: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9895 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:55:04.98 -24:24:04.3: 12.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:54:54.74 -24:34:00.1: 13.09 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:02:50.33 -27:42:46.0: 12.60 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:04.98 -24:24:04.3: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0519 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:54.74 -24:34:00.1: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.1667 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:02:50.33 -27:42:46.0: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8549 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:39:40.07 -21:09:46.6: 12.97 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:25:46.05 -25:33:33.2: 14.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:38:17.30 -21:00:00.7: 13.82 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:06:10.34 -21:55:28.9: 13.16 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:35:40.12 -21:16:31.2: 14.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:10.34 -21:55:28.9: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.2381 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:17.30 -21:00:00.7: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6120 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:46:58.93 -21:19:52.2: 13.74 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:39:40.07 -21:09:46.6: 13.20 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:39:40.07 -21:09:46.6: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.4436 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:38:43.64 -23:48:10.3: 13.76 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:51:27.13 -24:53:00.0: 13.66 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:59:37.44 -24:26:42.4: 12.93 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:46:58.93 -21:19:52.2: 13.98 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:58.93 -21:19:52.2: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5418 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:52:57.09 -21:12:00.6: 13.97 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:38:43.64 -23:48:10.3: 13.64 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:51:27.13 -24:53:00.0: 13.75 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:43.64 -23:48:10.3: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4969 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:27.13 -24:53:00.0: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4385 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:59:37.44 -24:26:42.4: 12.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:59:37.44 -24:26:42.4: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3221 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:43:23.36 -21:02:57.3: 13.54 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:41:38.28 -21:17:46.9: 13.75 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:07:31.04 -20:51:48.3: 13.81 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:52:57.09 -21:12:00.6: 14.03 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:57.09 -21:12:00.6: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6550 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:43:23.36 -21:02:57.3: 14.01 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:23.36 -21:02:57.3: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6243 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:41:38.28 -21:17:46.9: 14.14 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:38.28 -21:17:46.9: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.8029 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:07:31.04 -20:51:48.3: 14.03 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:07:31.04 -20:51:48.3: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7402 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:38:41.87 -21:42:27.9: 13.88 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:51:34.65 -22:34:05.4: 14.05 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:48:07.87 -22:07:34.2: 13.79 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:50:28.25 -20:54:32.1: 13.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:50:55.32 -22:45:50.4: 14.29 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:51:34.65 -22:34:05.4: 14.03 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:38:41.87 -21:42:27.9: 13.74 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:48:07.87 -22:07:34.2: 14.11 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:34.65 -22:34:05.4: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7032 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:41.87 -21:42:27.9: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6580 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:50:28.25 -20:54:32.1: 13.73 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:48:07.87 -22:07:34.2: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6193 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:50:28.25 -20:54:32.1: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.8303 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:52:31.54 -22:02:47.8: 14.01 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:07:24.75 -22:59:14.1: 14.22 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:56:35.87 -23:39:44.1: 14.43 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:50:55.32 -22:45:50.4: 13.90 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:50:55.32 -22:45:50.4: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6841 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:52:31.54 -22:02:47.8: 13.80 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:31.54 -22:02:47.8: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7785 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:07:24.75 -22:59:14.1: 14.20 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:07:24.75 -22:59:14.1: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7896 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:56:35.87 -23:39:44.1: 14.43 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:35.87 -23:39:44.1: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.6832 delta=0.75 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out57023.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out57111.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56134_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 56134_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56137_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 56137_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56138_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 56138_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56142_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 56142_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56144_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 56144_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56145_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 56145_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56147_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 56147_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56148_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 56148_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56149_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 56149_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56152_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 56152_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56182_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 56182_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:06:36.11 -24:26:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56206_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 56206_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56236_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 56236_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:19.66 -23:55:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56371_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 56371_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56381_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 56381_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:01.56 -21:22:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56418_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 56418_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56462_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 56462_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56471_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 56471_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56504_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 56504_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:55.32 -23:25:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56536_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 56536_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56621_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 56621_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56643_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 56643_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56644_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 56644_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:59:05.31 -26:11:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56672_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 56672_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:05.01 -21:00:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56810_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 56810_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56833_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 56833_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:46:25.83 -21:31:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56849_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 56849_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56854_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 56854_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:47:35.40 -21:49:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56892_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 56892_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56939_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 56939_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:10.19 -22:28:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56951_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 56951_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56968_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 56968_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56982_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 56982_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56997_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 56997_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56999_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 56999_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57023_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
Preparing report for the candidate 57023_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57025_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 57025_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57111_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
Preparing report for the candidate 57111_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57155_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 57155_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57156_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 57156_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57166_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 57166_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57173_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 57173_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57186_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 57186_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57189_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 57189_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:55.42 -22:26:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57193_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 57193_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57209_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 57209_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57231_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 57231_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:29.00 -21:58:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57253_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 57253_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57260_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 57260_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57261_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 57261_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57264_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 57264_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57278_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 57278_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57279_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 57279_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:45:23.17 -21:23:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57280_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 57280_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57285_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 57285_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57302_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 57302_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57310_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 57310_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57318_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 57318_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57319_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 57319_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57344_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 57344_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57358_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 57358_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50287_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 50287_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:37:22.57 -30:10:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29005_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 29005_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:25.77 -25:06:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53335_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 53335_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:49:48.55 -22:28:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20165_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 20165_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:41:33.18 -26:40:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09989_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 09989_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:30:03.24 -28:48:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50395_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 50395_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:41:38.14 -27:10:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38990_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 38990_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:41.88 -21:58:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39878_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 39878_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_23-00-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks