This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 28.3477 2461280.8477 11.96 06:33:32.38 +31:36:18.9
182.60454 10.35982 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.115 Thyra 0 1 1 12.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:33:32.38 +31:36:18.9: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:33:32.38 +31:36:18.9: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461280.8477,11.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260828.3477 11.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 28.3477 2461280.8477 12.71 06:02:56.82 +32:25:40.6
178.86329 4.97708 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.172 Baucis -2 2 3 13.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:02:56.82 +32:25:40.6: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:02:56.82 +32:25:40.6: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461280.8477,12.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260828.3477 12.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461280.84801531 28.08.2026 08:20:58.523 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 0
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 25164
Objects passed selection criteria: 24974
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 15736
Average stars matched: 15240.5 (96.8512 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 249836 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Aug 28 03:24:12 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461280.84801531 28.08.2026 08:20:58.523 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 78
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 34 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 192919
Objects passed selection criteria: 192290
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 126610
Average stars matched: 121582 (96.029 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 654236 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Aug 28 03:25:32 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461280.84745623
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
Image size: 944.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:57.721 +29:59:54.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 05:59:57.721 +29:59:54.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0100 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
Image size: 944.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:59.744 +29:59:23.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 05:59:59.744 +29:59:23.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0085 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:59:57.721 +29:59:54.69
Second-epoch second image center 05:59:59.744 +29:59:23.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01143 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mACiiacs3b
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.URmhhNaw3c
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DTuejW8HfT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits &> /tmp/tmp.G6muZ0F6l7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec +24.3414 to +35.3066 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec 24.3414 to 35.3066 deg
Loaded 17097 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12045 out of 13628 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13628 out of 27193 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.946400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.946400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec +24.3414 to +35.3066 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec 24.3414 to 35.3066 deg
Loaded 17097 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12045 out of 13628 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13628 out of 27193 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5933 to 99.6669 deg, Dec +24.3420 to +35.3116 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5933 to 99.6669 deg, Dec 24.3420 to 35.3116 deg
Loaded 17089 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12096 out of 13641 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13641 out of 27141 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.2 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
12.9 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
12.9 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.9 (SNR ) 10.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.mACiiacs3b (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3136, bad_region=0, passed=27193
Got 27193 stars (including 24022 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4793 stars left (next iteration limit 5272)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4793 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.593 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=1003 n_q2=1397 n_q3=1274 n_q4=1119 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.304
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.URmhhNaw3c (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3121, bad_region=0, passed=27141
Got 27141 stars (including 23994 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4799 stars left (next iteration limit 5277)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4799 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.384 n_q1=1006 n_q2=1397 n_q3=1273 n_q4=1123 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.242
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.DTuejW8HfT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=393, bad_region=0, passed=4469
Got 4469 stars (including 4072 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4469 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013121 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010497 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4469 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4469 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4469 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 3911 stars left (next iteration limit 4302)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3911 robust_rms=8.303 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.133 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3911 robust_rms=0.556 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.168 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3911 robust_rms=0.431 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.734 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3911 robust_rms_before=1.264 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.448 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.431 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.616 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.734
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.616 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits N_match=3911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.615 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.438 n_q1=987 n_q2=864 n_q3=1252 n_q4=808 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.359
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.G6muZ0F6l7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=377, bad_region=0, passed=4506
Got 4506 stars (including 4121 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4506 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013119 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010496 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4013 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4506 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4014 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4506 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4506 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 3962 stars left (next iteration limit 4357)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3962 robust_rms=8.415 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.538 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3962 robust_rms=0.645 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.469 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3962 robust_rms=0.450 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.726 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3962 robust_rms_before=1.292 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.440 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.450 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.602 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.726
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.602 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits N_match=3962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.422 n_q1=1002 n_q2=877 n_q3=1265 n_q4=818 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.299
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits sigma_overall=0.454 worst_q_ratio=1.304
ref2=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.453 worst_q_ratio=1.242
new1=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits sigma_overall=0.452 worst_q_ratio=1.359
new2=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits sigma_overall=0.443 worst_q_ratio=1.299
reference average sigma_overall=0.4535 worst_q_ratio=1.273
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_astrometric_residuals.png (4793 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (4799 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282_astrometric_residuals.png (3911 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283_astrometric_residuals.png (3962 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
Image size: 944.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:57.721 +29:59:54.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 05:59:57.721 +29:59:54.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0100 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
Image size: 944.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:59.744 +29:59:23.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 05:59:59.744 +29:59:23.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0085 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:59:57.721 +29:59:54.69
Second-epoch second image center 05:59:59.744 +29:59:23.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01143 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Lve93bQsYj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sAry4T25wN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Dgy3PaCrXe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits &> /tmp/tmp.W5Wy21S66H
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec +24.3171 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec 24.3171 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 17190 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9236 out of 14303 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14303 out of 212828 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.790850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.790850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec +24.3171 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec 24.3171 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 17190 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9236 out of 14303 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14303 out of 212828 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 212641 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5682 to 99.6901 deg, Dec +24.3244 to +35.3140 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5682 to 99.6901 deg, Dec 24.3244 to 35.3140 deg
Loaded 17179 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9281 out of 14295 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14295 out of 212641 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 70 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.4 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.2 (SNR ) 12.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Lve93bQsYj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=79, blended=32424, bad_region=1, passed=212748
Got 212748 stars (including 179989 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212748 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4766 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4766 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.566 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.375 n_q1=1028 n_q2=1362 n_q3=1243 n_q4=1133 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.313
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.sAry4T25wN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=32176, bad_region=4, passed=212590
Got 212590 stars (including 180083 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212590 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4766 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4766 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=1026 n_q2=1364 n_q3=1217 n_q4=1159 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.319
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Dgy3PaCrXe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=1474, bad_region=0, passed=41773
Got 41773 stars (including 40235 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41773 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013121 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010497 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41773 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41773 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41773 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4796 stars left (next iteration limit 5273)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4796 robust_rms=7.682 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.803 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4796 robust_rms=0.552 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.143 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4796 robust_rms=0.430 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.723 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4796 robust_rms_before=1.250 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.446 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.430 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.602 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.723
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.602 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits N_match=4796 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.439 n_q1=1212 n_q2=952 n_q3=1636 n_q4=996 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.337
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.W5Wy21S66H (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1422, bad_region=0, passed=41930
Got 41930 stars (including 40442 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41930 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013119 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010496 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4796 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4797 stars left (next iteration limit 5275)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4797 robust_rms=7.915 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.817 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4797 robust_rms=0.619 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.450 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4797 robust_rms=0.449 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.711 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4797 robust_rms_before=1.269 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.423 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.449 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.563 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.711
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.563 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits N_match=4797 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.418 n_q1=1208 n_q2=962 n_q3=1635 n_q4=992 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.271
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0282.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_032133_TTUQ1b1x1_1359503_xrKISJ64/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:33:46.98 +30:33:16.1: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:47:46.43 +34:44:45.6: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:33:26.52 +26:04:00.5: 11.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:22.06 +32:31:07.4: 11.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:20.41 +32:33:48.3: 11.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:33:46.98 +30:33:16.1: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:47:46.43 +34:44:45.6: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:33:26.52 +26:04:00.5: 11.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:33:46.98 +30:33:16.1: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3202 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:47:46.43 +34:44:45.6: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5742 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.20 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:33:26.52 +26:04:00.5: ref_mag=11.20 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5191 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:22.06 +32:31:07.4: 11.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:22.06 +32:31:07.4: ref_mag=11.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.4592 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:20.41 +32:33:48.3: 11.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.20 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:20.41 +32:33:48.3: ref_mag=11.20 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.2871 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:44:33.25 +25:41:03.9: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:25:16.04 +24:28:16.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:24.06 +32:33:20.8: 12.41 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:33:32.38 +31:36:18.9: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:44:33.25 +25:41:03.9: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:25:16.04 +24:28:16.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:25:16.04 +24:28:16.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:44:33.25 +25:41:03.9: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0719 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:23:36.49 +24:29:49.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:33:32.38 +31:36:18.9: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:24.06 +32:33:20.8: 12.34 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:24.06 +32:33:20.8: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.2949 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:40:56.75 +28:06:35.0: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:23:36.49 +24:29:49.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:23:36.49 +24:29:49.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:39:20.82 +30:53:54.4: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:40:56.75 +28:06:35.0: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:40:56.75 +28:06:35.0: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3641 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:39:20.82 +30:53:54.4: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:39:20.82 +30:53:54.4: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7669 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:02:56.82 +32:25:40.6: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:02:56.82 +32:25:40.6: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:02:56.82 +32:25:40.6: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7184 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out242525.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55289.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242161_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242161_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:25.39 +29:35:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242164_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242164_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:12.25 +32:39:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242174_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242174_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242178_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242178_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:57.05 +33:47:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242180_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242180_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242185_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242185_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242186_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242186_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:20.42 +35:01:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242187_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242187_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:15.14 +32:30:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242188_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242188_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:19.81 +32:31:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242190_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242190_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:14.64 +32:34:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242191_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242191_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242192_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242192_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242193_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242193_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:18.08 +32:31:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242194_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242194_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242195_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242195_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:07.82 +32:34:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242322_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242322_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:12.29 +32:03:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242358_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242358_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:27.70 +28:29:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242360_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242360_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.47 +34:26:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242417_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242417_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:00.43 +27:56:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242434_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242434_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:16.31 +32:35:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242457_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242457_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:32.19 +30:28:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242475_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242475_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:49.75 +26:44:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242476_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242476_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:52.68 +27:35:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242495_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242495_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242498_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242498_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242504_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242504_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:17.74 +30:10:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242523_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242523_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:33.27 +28:37:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242525_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
Preparing report for the candidate 242525_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242529_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242529_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242532_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242532_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:09.91 +34:55:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242537_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242537_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.64 +34:23:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242557_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242557_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:00.50 +26:13:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242577_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242577_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.88 +25:55:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242583_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242583_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:32.66 +30:30:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242588_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242588_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242595_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242595_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:11.64 +32:30:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242603_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242603_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:23.36 +28:38:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242612_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242612_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:19.40 +31:39:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242616_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242616_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:23.54 +31:49:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242625_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242625_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:10.10 +34:24:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242627_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242627_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242641_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242641_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:10.37 +32:41:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242659_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242659_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:16.66 +32:45:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242664_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242664_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:03.69 +26:04:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242735_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242735_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:24.82 +28:37:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242740_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242740_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:56.95 +26:41:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242741_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242741_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242782_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242782_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:34.72 +30:30:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242788_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242788_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:05.42 +32:31:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242801_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 242801_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:32.57 +30:42:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77282_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 77282_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:57.69 +31:24:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153136_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 153136_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:29.28 +27:29:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162899_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 162899_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.83 +25:25:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136018_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 136018_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:21.00 +28:36:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 179530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:09.40 +25:59:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75870_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 75870_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:30.98 +31:25:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131430_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 131430_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:24.32 +28:40:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24946_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 24946_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:37.07 +33:54:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55289_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
Preparing report for the candidate 55289_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156560_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 156560_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:49.21 +27:36:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:47.47 +29:32:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62401_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 62401_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:39.97 +32:01:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:28.71 +29:51:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193075_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 193075_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88249_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 88249_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:48.44 +30:50:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:17.05 +28:29:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158400_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 158400_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:28.44 +27:23:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145768_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 145768_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:54.30 +27:45:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64657_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 64657_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:16.97 +31:35:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162930_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283
The candidate 162930_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-20-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0283 did not pass the final checks