fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 28.30414 | 2461280.80414 | 12.55 | 05:04:28.01 +28:25:09.0 | 5430 2282 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 28.30500 | 2461280.80500 | 12.57 | 05:04:27.95 +28:25:09.7 | 5436 2276 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits |
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 28.3046 2461280.8046 12.56 05:04:27.98 +28:25:09.3
175.36983 -7.77072 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
63 Ausonia 1 -1 2 12.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:04:27.98 +28:25:09.3: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:04:27.98 +28:25:09.3: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5 FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3 ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr) INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: Aur-05-Q1b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting Aur-05-Q1b1x1 ########### Processing Aur-05-Q1b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1086231 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1086231 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.png' -> 'transient_report/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits_preview.png'
Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
renamed 'Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.png' -> 'transient_report/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits_preview.png'
Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 565.0960 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 645.3049 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 9424.4287 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 2239.6416 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 9328.5602 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 2209.3456 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 16.6776 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.014 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 21.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-28T02:17:47.4851090' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-28T07:17:47.4851090' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61280.3040218172 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-28T07:17:57.3886762' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61280.304136435 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 74.9991155440019 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 29.9995952685781 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.1608333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 63.7225 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.77220861975703 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Aur-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '05 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29526 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29526 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 60.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 905.49 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 21.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 11.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/d_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits :) Spent 0.678563 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/d_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 21.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-28T02:19:01.9430821' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-28T07:19:01.9430821' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61280.3048835997 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-28T07:19:11.8431735' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61280.3049981827 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 74.9991154448806 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 29.9995952513024 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.3913888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 63.8633333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.71861799447324 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Aur-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '05 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29526 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29526 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 60.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 905.49 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 21.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 11.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/d_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits :) Spent 0.588289 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/d_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits
fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461280.80413756 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:59:59.868 +30:00:03.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 Second-epoch image center 04:59:59.868 +30:00:03.03 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0077 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:59:57.332 +30:00:43.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 Second-epoch image center 04:59:57.332 +30:00:43.44 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0222 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:59:59.868 +30:00:03.03 Second-epoch second image center 04:59:57.332 +30:00:43.44 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01448 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cgFKU0e9E7 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UwruOTOa2V Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yH6krJ7fFg Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GxPp7LY47o Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.988300 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.988300 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=6.0) Read 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2864 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2864 deg Loaded 8429 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6042 out of 6743 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6743 out of 16349 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=6.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 2.5 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits 2.5 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 15.4 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 12.8 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits 12.8 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.8 (SNR ) 10.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.cgFKU0e9E7 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1498, bad_region=0, passed=16295 Got 16295 stars (including 14768 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4802 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4801 stars left (next iteration limit 5282) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4801 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.267 n_q1=2038 n_q2=976 n_q3=1109 n_q4=678 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114 The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.UwruOTOa2V (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1486, bad_region=0, passed=16349 Got 16349 stars (including 14839 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4801 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4800 stars left (next iteration limit 5281) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4800 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=2037 n_q2=978 n_q3=1111 n_q4=674 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129 The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.yH6krJ7fFg (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=180, bad_region=0, passed=2227 Got 2227 stars (including 2046 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2227 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1953 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2220 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2220 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2221 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" Excluding outliers - 1961 stars left (next iteration limit 2153) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1961 robust_rms=8.666 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.268 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1961 robust_rms=0.560 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.730 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1961 robust_rms=0.487 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.558 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1961 robust_rms_before=1.511 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.511 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.487 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.671 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.558 verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Image size: 945.4'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:59:59.977 +30:00:01.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 2227 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3795129.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.511 -> 0.487 arcsec) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits N_match=1961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.626 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.553 n_q1=314 n_q2=353 n_q3=467 n_q4=827 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.188 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.GxPp7LY47o (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=182, bad_region=0, passed=2274 Got 2274 stars (including 2087 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2274 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2023 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2005 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2001 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2005 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2270 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2024 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2007 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2268 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2007 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2268 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Excluding outliers - 2007 stars left (next iteration limit 2205) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2007 robust_rms=8.390 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.570 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2007 robust_rms=0.606 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.871 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2007 robust_rms=0.453 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.540 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2007 robust_rms_before=1.511 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.485 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.453 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.658 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.540 verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:59:57.441 +30:00:41.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 2274 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3795159.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.511 -> 0.453 arcsec) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits N_match=2007 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.488 n_q1=326 n_q2=363 n_q3=461 n_q4=857 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.207 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.114 ref2=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.129 new1=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits sigma_overall=0.527 worst_q_ratio=1.188 new2=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits sigma_overall=0.476 worst_q_ratio=1.207 reference average sigma_overall=0.37 worst_q_ratio=1.1215 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362_astrometric_residuals.png (4801 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363_astrometric_residuals.png (4800 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218_astrometric_residuals.png (1961 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219_astrometric_residuals.png (2007 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21125_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 21125_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks**** FOUND 04:38:11.41 +35:13:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21143_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 21143_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 9.65 04:38:11.40 +35:13:59.6 1923 6266 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits **** FOUND 05:10:32.29 +32:10:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 12406_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 12406_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 10.34 05:10:32.28 +32:10:42.9 6060 4591 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits **** FOUND 04:35:57.39 +28:30:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 01618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 10.24 04:35:57.36 +28:30:53.7 1660 2192 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits **** FOUND 05:27:07.42 +34:08:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Image size: 945.4'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:59:59.977 +30:00:01.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 Second-epoch image center 04:59:59.977 +30:00:01.40 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0071 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:59:57.441 +30:00:41.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 Second-epoch image center 04:59:57.441 +30:00:41.85 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0216 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:59:59.977 +30:00:01.40 Second-epoch second image center 04:59:57.441 +30:00:41.85 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01449 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZsSgwvCTaa Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mUuV3WEnvX Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CWIm2v0Mte Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fh1CunIEsp Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_ Discovery image 3 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 8.70 05:27:07.42 +34:08:58.0 8039 6000 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits .fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6872 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6872 out of 129003 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.844750 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.844750 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6872 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6872 out of 129003 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=4.5) Read 129055 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.2955 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.2955 deg Loaded 8479 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4936 out of 6881 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6881 out of 129055 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=4.5) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 34 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.8 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 2.4 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits 2.4 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 13.2 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits 13.2 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.2 (SNR ) 12.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.ZsSgwvCTaa (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=14027, bad_region=9, passed=128967 Got 128967 stars (including 114713 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 128967 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4789 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4789 stars left (next iteration limit 5267) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4789 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=1871 n_q2=1035 n_q3=1152 n_q4=731 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094 The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.mUuV3WEnvX (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=35, blended=13827, bad_region=12, passed=129020 Got 129020 stars (including 114961 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 129020 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4791 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4791 stars left (next iteration limit 5270) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4791 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1874 n_q2=1046 n_q3=1148 n_q4=723 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083 The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.CWIm2v0Mte (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=485, bad_region=0, passed=21065 Got 21065 stars (including 20540 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21065 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013131 (47.3 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010504 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4820 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4781 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21065 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4821 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21065 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21065 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52" Excluding outliers - 4780 stars left (next iteration limit 5259) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4780 robust_rms=8.522 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.915 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4780 robust_rms=0.600 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.787 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4780 robust_rms=0.532 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.634 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4780 robust_rms_before=0.541 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.554 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.532 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.640 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.634 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.640 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits N_match=4780 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.551 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.555 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.700 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.561 n_q1=780 n_q2=823 n_q3=1196 n_q4=1981 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.270 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.fh1CunIEsp (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=486, bad_region=0, passed=21528 Got 21528 stars (including 20987 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21528 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4778 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21528 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21528 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21528 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Excluding outliers - 4777 stars left (next iteration limit 5255) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4777 robust_rms=8.504 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.149 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4777 robust_rms=0.643 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.889 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4777 robust_rms=0.500 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.578 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4777 robust_rms_before=0.503 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.506 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.500 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.575 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.578 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.575 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits N_match=4777 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.597 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.522 n_q1=771 n_q2=831 n_q3=1174 n_q4=2001 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.169 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:55:45.19 +30:20:41.3: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:25:59.32 +29:24:52.0: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:04:27.98 +28:25:09.3: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:55:45.19 +30:20:41.3: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:25:59.32 +29:24:52.0: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:04:27.98 +28:25:09.3: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.85 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:45.19 +30:20:41.3: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0881 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:25:59.32 +29:24:52.0: ref_mag=11.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0985 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151393.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151103_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 151103_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checksDiscovery image 1 2026 08 28.30414 2461280.80414 12.19 05:25:59.37 +29:24:51.1 8206 3137 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151104_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 151104_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 12.03 05:25:59.27 +29:24:53.0 8212 3130 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits **** FOUND 04:31:04.10 +30:27:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151109_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 151109_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 12.90 04:31:04.10 +30:27:45.2 1015 3371 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits **** FOUND 04:52:31.38 +27:01:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151110_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 151110_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 11.45 04:52:31.47 +27:01:18.6 3893 1347 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits **** FOUND 04:29:10.96 +26:11:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151111_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 151111_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 11.66 04:29:10.93 +26:11:46.7 0733 0779 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits **** FOUND 04:33:04.57 +29:46:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151119_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 151119_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 11.44 04:33:04.53 +29:46:44.4 1278 2956 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits **** FOUND 04:38:11.39 +35:13:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151185_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 151185_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 9.71 04:38:11.39 +35:13:59.7 1923 6266 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits **** FOUND 04:26:11.23 +31:27:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151222_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 151222_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 11.64 04:26:11.19 +31:27:24.4 0381 3984 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits **** FOUND 04:56:57.83 +33:05:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151230_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 151230_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 11.76 04:56:57.83 +33:05:59.6 4310 5032 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits **** FOUND 04:41:14.16 +28:37:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151262_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 151262_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 11.89 04:41:14.09 +28:37:41.7 2363 2270 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits **** FOUND 05:27:41.46 +34:26:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151281_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 151281_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 11.78 05:27:41.48 +34:26:43.0 8090 6188 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits **** FOUND 05:36:07.78 +34:09:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151282_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 151282_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 11.70 05:36:07.77 +34:09:25.2 9172 6162 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 28.30414 2461280.80414 12.08 04:55:45.21 +30:20:42.0 4228 3373 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-17-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0218.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151287_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 151287_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 12.10 04:55:45.18 +30:20:40.6 4234 3366 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits **** FOUND 05:18:18.02 +33:47:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151306_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 151306_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 11.95 05:18:18.03 +33:47:35.3 6956 5656 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits **** FOUND 05:36:28.29 +34:07:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151321_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 151321_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 11.88 05:36:28.23 +34:07:30.3 9218 6150 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits **** FOUND 04:32:25.12 +30:30:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151322_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 151322_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 12.79 04:32:25.01 +30:30:51.8 1193 3402 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits **** FOUND 04:56:56.93 +33:06:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151329_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 151329_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 12.43 04:56:56.90 +33:06:50.5 4307 5040 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits **** FOUND 05:06:25.60 +34:49:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151362_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 151362_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 12.39 05:06:25.58 +34:49:29.8 5428 6148 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits **** FOUND 05:15:29.71 +32:42:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151372_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 151372_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 12.33 05:15:29.69 +32:42:37.3 6662 4968 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits **** FOUND 04:38:26.83 +26:55:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151393_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 Preparing report for the candidate 151393_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151399_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 151399_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 12.52 04:38:26.84 +26:55:01.1 2000 1228 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits **** FOUND 04:51:21.98 +28:31:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151404_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 151404_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 12.63 04:51:22.00 +28:31:16.7 3706 2245 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits **** FOUND 05:14:46.65 +31:23:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 140767_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 140767_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 12.52 05:14:46.74 +31:23:50.8 6640 4170 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits **** FOUND 05:24:55.71 +30:10:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 144772_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 144772_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 11.27 05:24:55.75 +30:10:41.3 8023 3573 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits **** FOUND 05:10:32.28 +32:10:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57253_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 57253_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 10.45 05:10:32.30 +32:10:43.0 6060 4591 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits **** FOUND 04:38:19.35 +31:18:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 12.76 04:38:19.36 +31:18:49.1 1962 3887 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits **** FOUND 05:15:47.52 +26:45:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 121914_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 121914_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 12.23 05:15:47.49 +26:45:15.0 7019 1393 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits **** FOUND 05:09:38.60 +28:39:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 12.05 05:09:38.67 +28:39:28.5 6107 2469 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits **** FOUND 05:03:15.47 +28:42:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91174_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 91174_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 12.09 05:03:15.44 +28:42:49.1 5265 2442 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits **** FOUND 05:27:24.26 +28:40:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 01960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 12.33 05:27:24.34 +28:40:46.3 8449 2710 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits **** FOUND 04:59:47.31 +35:03:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 107910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 107910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 11.89 04:59:47.30 +35:03:00.4 4600 6231 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits **** FOUND 05:09:07.45 +26:08:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 85504_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 85504_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 11.52 05:09:07.42 +26:08:20.4 6152 0948 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits **** FOUND 04:47:48.57 +29:25:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 128113_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 128113_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 11.32 04:47:48.59 +29:25:10.8 3220 2769 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits **** FOUND 04:35:57.46 +28:30:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 09926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 The candidate 09926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 10.49 04:35:57.43 +28:30:53.6 1660 2192 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits **** FOUND 05:27:07.38 +34:08:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 05:04:27.98 +28:25:09.3 ########### Completed Aur-05-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 05:04:27.98 +28:25:09.3 ################################################################################### 05:04:27.98 +28:25:09.3 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461280.80413756 -observatory V36 10:30:49.50 +11:12:06.3 Mercury (-1.9mag) 13:08:29.14 -10:26:11.4 Venus (-4.6mag) 06:46:33.93 +23:29:03.2 Mars (1.3mag) 09:00:38.77 +17:32:23.6 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:53:48.78 +02:53:47.1 Saturn (0.5mag) 04:13:23.09 +21:01:12.6 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:14:38.81 +00:02:54.3 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:26:20.68 -23:37:01.1 Pluto (14.5mag) 22:30:27.04 -09:19:02.1 Moon (-12.7mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Aug 28 03:07 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461280.80413756: 09:00:34.15 +17:32:46.7 Io (6.2mag) 09:00:30.26 +17:33:05.0 Europa (6.3mag) 09:00:42.34 +17:32:09.7 Ganymede (5.7mag) 09:01:07.28 +17:30:11.0 Callisto (6.9mag) 08:58:10.56 +17:43:50.9 Himalia (15.7mag) 09:00:41.22 +17:32:13.4 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:57:50.68 +17:38:47.8 Elara (17.7mag) 09:04:43.07 +17:03:20.3 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 09:02:26.80 +17:47:29.8 Carme (19.0mag) 00:53:41.13 +02:53:20.5 Titan (8.4mag) 00:53:44.84 +02:53:53.5 Rhea (9.7mag) 00:54:22.79 +02:56:15.6 Iapetus (11.1mag) 00:53:33.34 +02:53:52.1 Hyperion (14.4mag) 00:52:46.55 +02:44:32.2 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 28 03:07 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461280.80413756: 20:50:17.45 -08:58:30.6 JWST 18:41:28.08 +15:30:54.1 Chandra 10:39:26.93 -58:20:12.2 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 28 03:07 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461280.80413756 -observatory V36 03:33:22.97 +18:48:48.6 17.5mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:00:24.97 -34:23:07.6 14.2mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:11:32.17 -69:46:34.5 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:14:15.32 +33:26:57.8 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 04:34:00.72 +43:44:45.0 17.7mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:21:41.97 +29:47:51.5 17.4mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:02:06.89 +26:10:10.6 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:40:14.49 +27:36:27.6 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:42:13.14 +05:16:50.4 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 20:47:19.42 +63:02:12.0 18.0mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 15:33:15.06 -14:45:57.2 14.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:29:09.74 +32:19:12.3 15.6mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:05:46.23 +15:26:23.2 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:41:12.18 +43:26:53.1 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:40:29.09 +49:39:14.3 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:29:43.72 -12:55:29.4 15.2mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:07:33.63 +20:29:26.8 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:02:16.47 +19:31:39.2 17.0mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:11:45.05 +00:54:15.2 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:19:27.47 +75:31:15.1 16.3mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:09:14.15 +46:19:42.7 17.3mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:04:08.90 +10:26:56.9 17.5mag A/2026 E1 22:17:38.01 -33:42:37.8 7.3mag 10P/Tempel 11:41:33.83 -04:44:13.0 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 11:48:25.69 -01:54:03.2 17.5mag 63P/Wild 00:49:29.17 -06:26:40.7 15.4mag 65P/Gunn 06:19:17.51 +19:55:37.2 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 20:21:40.07 -25:29:21.8 17.3mag 84P/Giclas 03:14:56.42 +14:46:08.6 17.0mag 88P/Howell 08:44:05.11 +24:37:59.8 16.5mag 93P/Lovas 05:05:56.12 +24:45:07.7 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 07:01:20.37 +27:08:23.6 16.0mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 10:05:19.04 +22:55:40.4 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley 12:25:01.00 -17:46:58.9 17.3mag 124P/Mrkos 06:04:45.11 +20:54:30.3 16.0mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 07:01:15.92 +17:41:55.1 17.9mag 131P/Mueller 23:57:12.85 +02:52:08.3 17.4mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 03:00:06.14 -18:21:58.1 12.4mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 08:22:30.32 +38:01:33.8 16.2mag 162P/Siding Spring 10:14:46.27 +22:20:08.4 12.5mag 169P/NEAT 03:14:03.27 +09:08:36.5 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 04:20:18.32 +32:59:30.1 15.3mag 260P/McNaught 08:04:19.11 +36:38:41.5 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:19:15.67 +00:52:49.3 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski 09:19:01.59 +17:21:48.1 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.2K Aug 28 03:07 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 28 03:07 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 28 03:07 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 23:07:10.081 -46:29:32.67 AT 2026xss 2026-08-01.76 19.43 23:24:16.986 -39:54:38.19 AT 2026xsr 2026-08-01.59 19.34 14:05:54.276 -15:52:29.96 AT 2026xsq 2026-02-17.61 20.88 16:00:02.823 +12:57:02.46 AT 2026xsp 2026-02-13.59 21.18 13:18:25.859 +25:17:53.19 AT 2026xso 2026-02-17.52 21.43 14:46:41.619 +11:38:04.02 AT 2026xsn 2026-02-17.55 20.37 14:12:17.965 +35:36:02.21 AT 2026xsm 2026-02-17.60 20.93 00:28:22.210 -09:16:55.88 AT 2026xsl 2026-08-06.67 20.38 13:40:02.666 +27:45:49.66 AT 2026xsk 2026-02-17.50 21.05 13:18:58.760 +35:13:29.33 AT 2026xsj 2026-02-17.49 21.16 14:58:55.200 +08:49:53.06 AT 2026xsi 2026-02-13.58 21.13 12:22:18.795 +12:08:10.55 AT 2026xsh 2026-02-16.62 20.67 11:46:22.552 +13:15:39.41 AT 2026xsg 2026-02-16.57 20.7 08:55:07.272 +15:47:59.14 AT 2026xsf 2026-02-13.30 20.98 07:34:01.728 +10:29:15.79 AT 2026xse 2026-02-14.26 20.11 07:29:49.030 +19:09:23.06 AT 2026xsd 2026-02-13.26 20.62 07:42:52.595 +22:58:08.19 AT 2026xsc 2026-02-13.26 20.93 04:42:06.854 +06:56:13.00 AT 2026xsb 2026-02-06.24 21.16 05:10:23.116 -06:04:42.26 AT 2026xsa 2026-02-05.30 20.59 05:17:11.087 -07:32:29.20 AT 2026xrz 2026-02-02.30 20.34 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Aug 28 03:07 tns_transients_list.txt Discovery image 3 2026 08 28.30500 2461280.80500 8.68 05:27:07.39 +34:08:57.9 8039 6000 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_022139_TTUQ1b1x1_3506178_kgR18xec/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-19-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
