This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 28.1466 2461280.6466 9.69 18:40:49.69 -24:48:08.3
9.52697 -8.85259 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.8 Flora -0 0 0 10.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:40:49.69 -24:48:08.3: 14.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:40:49.69 -24:48:08.3: 14.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461280.6466,9.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260828.1466 9.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 28.1466 2461280.6466 13.06 19:08:07.57 -23:19:17.0
13.56835 -13.88518 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.182 Elsa 0 1 1 13.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:08:07.57 -23:19:17.0: 14.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:08:07.57 -23:19:17.0: 15.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461280.6466,13.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260828.1466 13.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 28.1466 2461280.6466 11.87 18:39:30.20 -28:42:50.7
5.82097 -10.27916 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.128 Nemesis -2 1 2 12.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:39:30.20 -28:42:50.7: 13.48 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:39:30.20 -28:42:50.7: 13.56 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.12
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461280.6466,11.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260828.1466 11.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461147.90695453 17.04.2026 09:45:50.871 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
First image: 2461147.90695453 17.04.2026 09:45:50.871 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Last image: 2461280.64701659 28.08.2026 03:31:32.233 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.36
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6480
Objects passed selection criteria: 6480
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6702.75
Average stars matched: 5529.5 (82.496 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 234000 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Aug 27 23:08:46 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461147.90695453 17.04.2026 09:45:50.871 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
First image: 2461147.90695453 17.04.2026 09:45:50.871 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Last image: 2461280.64701659 28.08.2026 03:31:32.233 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 97
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.02
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 68 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 82673
Objects passed selection criteria: 82531
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 73835.8
Average stars matched: 63933.5 (86.5888 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 545980 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Aug 27 23:11:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461280.64619463
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Image size: 942.3'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:51.170 -26:00:19.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Image size: 940.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:14.895 -25:57:27.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:11:51.170 -26:00:19.21
Second-epoch image center 19:12:14.895 -25:57:27.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1008 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Image size: 940.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:17.524 -25:57:18.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:11:51.170 -26:00:19.21
Second-epoch image center 19:12:17.524 -25:57:18.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1107 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:14.895 -25:57:27.70
Second-epoch second image center 19:12:17.524 -25:57:18.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01015 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wGdCgwN4Lf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ld2iglKoFp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9xFylrPpu3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iQGgRSLwXf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6297 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.5158 to 296.7476 deg, Dec -31.5070 to -20.1279 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.5158 to 296.7476 deg, Dec -31.5070 to -20.1279 deg
Loaded 14496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5080 out of 5188 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5188 out of 6297 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.136550
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.136550
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.36
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.78
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.78
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6297 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.5158 to 296.7476 deg, Dec -31.5070 to -20.1279 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.5158 to 296.7476 deg, Dec -31.5070 to -20.1279 deg
Loaded 14496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5080 out of 5188 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5188 out of 6297 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 10687 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9550 to 297.0903 deg, Dec -31.2648 to -20.5647 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9550 to 297.0903 deg, Dec -31.2648 to -20.5647 deg
Loaded 13345 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7818 out of 8091 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8091 out of 10687 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
3.5 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
3.5 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.8 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
14.1 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.1 (SNR ) 10.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.wGdCgwN4Lf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=388, bad_region=0, passed=6297
Got 6297 stars (including 5895 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6297 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4828 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4830 stars left (next iteration limit 5309)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits N_match=4830 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.332 n_q1=1422 n_q2=818 n_q3=1496 n_q4=1094 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.161
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Ld2iglKoFp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=726, bad_region=0, passed=10687
Got 10687 stars (including 9950 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10687 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 4834 stars left (next iteration limit 5321)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits N_match=4834 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.602 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.565 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.637 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.636 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.590 n_q1=1364 n_q2=1000 n_q3=1255 n_q4=1215 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.058
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.9xFylrPpu3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=209, bad_region=0, passed=4929
Got 4929 stars (including 4718 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4929 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4637 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4549 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4550 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4549 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4635 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4549 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4549 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 4549 stars left (next iteration limit 5003)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4549 robust_rms=9.757 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.653 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4549 robust_rms=0.513 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.664 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4549 robust_rms=0.457 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.638 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4549 robust_rms_before=0.957 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.579 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.513 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.836 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.664
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Image size: 940.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:14.899 -25:57:28.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 4929 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1105968.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 3, robust RMS 0.957 -> 0.513 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits N_match=4549 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.561 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.704 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.572 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.550 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.480 n_q1=1015 n_q2=748 n_q3=1715 n_q4=1071 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.256
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.iQGgRSLwXf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=220, bad_region=0, passed=5092
Got 5092 stars (including 4867 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5092 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4783 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4698 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4698 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4698 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4782 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4697 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4697 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 4697 stars left (next iteration limit 5167)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4697 robust_rms=9.607 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.879 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4697 robust_rms=0.515 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.659 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4697 robust_rms=0.452 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.615 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4697 robust_rms_before=0.957 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.554 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.452 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.864 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.615
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:17.529 -25:57:19.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5092 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1106586.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.957 -> 0.452 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits N_match=4697 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.626 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.349 n_q1=1131 n_q2=730 n_q3=1640 n_q4=1196 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.335
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits sigma_overall=0.411 worst_q_ratio=1.161
ref2=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits sigma_overall=0.602 worst_q_ratio=1.058
new1=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits sigma_overall=0.561 worst_q_ratio=1.256
new2=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits sigma_overall=0.469 worst_q_ratio=1.335
reference average sigma_overall=0.5065 worst_q_ratio=1.1095
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284_astrometric_residuals.png (4830 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055_astrometric_residuals.png (4834 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.55 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000_astrometric_residuals.png (4549 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001_astrometric_residuals.png (4697 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:40:50.01 -21:03:40.1: 10.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:40:49.69 -24:48:08.3: 14.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:19:44.00 -23:48:17.8: 11.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:40:50.01 -21:03:40.1: 10.86 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:19:44.00 -23:48:17.8: 11.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:40:49.69 -24:48:08.3: 14.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:40:50.01 -21:03:40.1: ref_mag=10.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8668 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.58 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:19:44.00 -23:48:17.8: ref_mag=11.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8521 delta=0.73 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24668.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24659_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 24659_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24668_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 24668_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24673_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 24673_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:06.26 -22:42:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24680_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 24680_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:57.74 -28:06:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24681_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 24681_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:55.35 -25:35:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24685_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 24685_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
18:40:49.69 -24:48:08.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Image size: 942.3'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:51.170 -26:00:19.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Image size: 940.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:14.899 -25:57:28.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:11:51.170 -26:00:19.21
Second-epoch image center 19:12:14.899 -25:57:28.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1007 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:17.529 -25:57:19.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:11:51.170 -26:00:19.21
Second-epoch image center 19:12:17.529 -25:57:19.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1106 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:14.899 -25:57:28.46
Second-epoch second image center 19:12:17.529 -25:57:19.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01015 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.T1ZvC3t8gQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dnZGlbbHd9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8loHMfMPL1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UOprPUoMcn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 84103 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.4864 to 296.7493 deg, Dec -31.5437 to -20.0386 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.4864 to 296.7493 deg, Dec -31.5437 to -20.0386 deg
Loaded 14698 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10647 out of 11707 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11707 out of 84103 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 21.872800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=21.872800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.02
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.85
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.85
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 84103 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.4864 to 296.7493 deg, Dec -31.5437 to -20.0386 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.4864 to 296.7493 deg, Dec -31.5437 to -20.0386 deg
Loaded 14698 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10647 out of 11707 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11707 out of 84103 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 118893 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9116 to 297.0918 deg, Dec -31.2648 to -20.5524 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9116 to 297.0918 deg, Dec -31.2648 to -20.5524 deg
Loaded 13402 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10008 out of 11606 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11606 out of 118893 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 84 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
2.1 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
3.0 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
3.0 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.9 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
14.3 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.3 (SNR ) 12.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.T1ZvC3t8gQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=4218, bad_region=1, passed=84096
Got 84096 stars (including 79714 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84096 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4829 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4830 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4829 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4828 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4828 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4828 stars left (next iteration limit 5311)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits N_match=4828 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.342 n_q1=1423 n_q2=879 n_q3=1397 n_q4=1129 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.165
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.dnZGlbbHd9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=8799, bad_region=0, passed=118877
Got 118877 stars (including 109929 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 118877 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4836 stars left (next iteration limit 5321)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits N_match=4836 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.594 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.666 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.619 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.599 n_q1=1388 n_q2=1022 n_q3=1175 n_q4=1251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.8loHMfMPL1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=2174, bad_region=1, passed=46231
Got 46231 stars (including 43992 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46231 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013063 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010450 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4823 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4823 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4823 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46231 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4823 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46231 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4823 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46231 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 4823 stars left (next iteration limit 5305)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4823 robust_rms=9.564 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.101 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4823 robust_rms=0.524 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.655 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4823 robust_rms=0.461 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.636 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4823 robust_rms_before=0.525 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.572 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.524 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.644 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.655
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.644 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits N_match=4823 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.556 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.766 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.625 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.552 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=1048 n_q2=805 n_q3=1780 n_q4=1190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.376
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.UOprPUoMcn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=2177, bad_region=1, passed=48458
Got 48458 stars (including 46226 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48458 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4833 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 4831 stars left (next iteration limit 5314)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4831 robust_rms=9.291 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.715 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4831 robust_rms=0.517 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.623 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4831 robust_rms=0.456 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.606 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4831 robust_rms_before=0.458 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.543 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.517 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.607 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.623
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.607 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits N_match=4831 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.535 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.773 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.618 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.377 n_q1=1121 n_q2=761 n_q3=1654 n_q4=1295 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.444
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-30-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_225637_TTUQ1b1x1_2570185_RWr71xXK/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:52:38.80 -26:11:03.0: 12.52 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:49:03.59 -20:35:04.6: 12.09 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:44:27.93 -29:07:32.2: 11.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:09:19.96 -22:48:09.9: 13.25 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:12:13.36 -22:56:36.8: 13.06 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:49:03.59 -20:35:04.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:49:03.59 -20:35:04.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:12:13.36 -22:56:36.8: 13.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:09:19.96 -22:48:09.9: 12.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:52:38.80 -26:11:03.0: 12.56 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:12:13.36 -22:56:36.8: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.8822 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:44:27.93 -29:07:32.2: 11.76 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:09:19.96 -22:48:09.9: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.9463 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:52:38.80 -26:11:03.0: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.1846 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.74 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:44:27.93 -29:07:32.2: ref_mag=11.74 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6849 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:26:05.63 -21:31:56.9: 12.56 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:40:57.86 -26:01:10.6: 14.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:26:05.63 -21:31:56.9: 12.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:26:05.63 -21:31:56.9: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3371 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:40:57.86 -26:01:10.6: 14.64 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.34
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:40:57.86 -26:01:10.6: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.34 new_mean_mag=12.0718 delta=2.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:23:21.09 -23:53:32.1: 14.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:51:34.87 -20:36:24.1: 13.04 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:23:21.09 -23:53:32.1: 15.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:51:34.87 -20:36:24.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:51:34.87 -20:36:24.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:51:10.88 -26:09:17.3: 13.65 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:00:53.19 -28:07:03.9: 14.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:08:07.57 -23:19:17.0: 14.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:51:10.88 -26:09:17.3: 13.85 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:51:10.88 -26:09:17.3: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=12.8100 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:00:53.19 -28:07:03.9: 14.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:08:07.57 -23:19:17.0: 15.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:29:22.37 -30:07:28.2: 12.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:29:22.37 -30:07:28.2: 12.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:29:22.37 -30:07:28.2: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2540 delta=0.82 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:39:30.20 -28:42:50.7: 13.48 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:39:30.20 -28:42:50.7: 13.56 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:39:30.20 -28:42:50.7: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=11.8087 delta=1.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:43:41.61 -25:34:37.9: 12.75 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:43:41.61 -25:34:37.9: 12.88 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:43:41.61 -25:34:37.9: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=11.8959 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out133339.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out133385.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out133450.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out133455.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out96346.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out11200.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133472.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133142_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133142_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133153_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133153_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133159_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133159_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133182_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133182_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133194_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133194_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133204_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133204_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133211_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133211_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:06.45 -23:57:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133213_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133213_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:41.00 -28:19:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133221_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133221_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:49.71 -24:48:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133230_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133230_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:06.19 -22:42:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133242_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133242_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:18.04 -23:17:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133246_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133246_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:04:46.89 -22:16:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133256_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133256_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:22.71 -29:30:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133264_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133264_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:24.67 -24:41:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133270_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133270_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:59.14 -22:22:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133272_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133272_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:48:48.91 -22:09:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133275_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133275_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:43.44 -29:00:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133279_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133279_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:57.54 -27:38:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133285_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133285_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:24.30 -21:28:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133297_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133297_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:42.36 -20:32:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133305_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133305_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:33.08 -25:13:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133311_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133311_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:09.30 -23:24:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133313_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133313_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:08.53 -29:11:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133318_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133318_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:21.06 -30:09:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133324_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133324_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:48.79 -26:20:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133327_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133327_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133338_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133338_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:35.72 -22:18:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133339_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133339_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:57.86 -26:01:10.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.09, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.07)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.939 4073302315867055232 280.24020058826 -26.01980409870 12.7131 10.7532 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.939#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133345_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133345_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:17.13 -21:12:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133350_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133350_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:17.94 -25:10:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133352_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133352_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:29.89 -20:59:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133355_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133355_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:02:06.44 -26:53:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133363_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133363_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:24.60 -23:30:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133368_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133368_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:29.26 -25:41:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133378_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133378_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:08.76 -22:46:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133379_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133379_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:36.70 -20:39:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133381_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133381_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:01.40 -30:01:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133382_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133382_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:18.39 -24:55:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133385_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133385_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:23:21.09 -23:53:32.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.60, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.58)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.995 6769982607375246336 290.83805149768 -23.89278002220 12.7381 10.9028 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.995#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133388_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133388_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:40.90 -27:41:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133400_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133400_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:40.78 -24:55:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133406_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133406_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:51.97 -22:16:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133415_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133415_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133421_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133421_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:36.36 -27:11:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133433_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133433_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:29.78 -24:20:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133434_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133434_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:29.30 -26:40:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133450_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133450_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:10.88 -26:09:17.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.79)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.052 4072362164707101312 282.79505038404 -26.15429524112 12.4228 11.0160 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.052#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133452_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133452_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:29.68 -22:32:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133455_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133455_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:00:53.19 -28:07:03.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.84, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.82)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.158 6763354201527770880 285.22189843832 -28.11796267310 12.5725 10.5394 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.158#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133459_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133459_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:16.16 -23:40:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133462_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133462_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:35.59 -21:36:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133472_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 133472_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133483_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133483_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:45.38 -23:12:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133514_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 133514_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:49.02 -24:25:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97737_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 97737_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:33.58 -24:07:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23744_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 23744_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:10.70 -26:58:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21550_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 21550_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:54.18 -27:18:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75796_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 75796_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:58.75 -23:12:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114965_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 114965_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:37.42 -25:02:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08116_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 08116_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114092_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 114092_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:21.02 -25:51:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112071_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 112071_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:01:35.95 -27:18:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36152_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 36152_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:10.76 -25:29:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111198_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 111198_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:27.51 -24:05:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110126_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 110126_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:05:37.92 -22:29:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109929_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 109929_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:41:37.85 -27:10:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35117_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 35117_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:03.88 -25:59:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26719_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 26719_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:26.50 -27:02:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11200_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 11200_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104255_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 104255_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:07.88 -23:28:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34328_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 34328_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:41:32.99 -26:40:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102277_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 102277_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:13:49.84 -22:29:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83841_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 83841_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:02.08 -24:13:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98946_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 98946_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:01.37 -23:10:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97888_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 97888_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:18:59.43 -23:54:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97175_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 97175_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:57.69 -28:06:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96991_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 96991_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:55.32 -25:35:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96372_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 96372_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:21.00 -26:02:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96346_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 96346_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:41.61 -25:34:37.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.89, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.87)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.122 4073435631651563008 280.92364964247 -25.57700553215 11.4067 10.0561 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.122#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96328_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 96328_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:45:38.09 -30:33:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95933_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 95933_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:34.41 -23:36:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95610_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 95610_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:36.09 -28:26:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73963_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 73963_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:38.52 -22:47:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95189_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 95189_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_22-31-32_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks