This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.4289 2461277.9289 12.87 07:24:07.60 +17:18:58.1
200.80682 14.86233 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.202 Chryseis 0 -0 1 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:24:07.60 +17:18:58.1: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:24:07.60 +17:18:58.1: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461277.9289,12.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260825.4289 12.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.4289 2461277.9289 13.40 07:18:57.11 +12:47:39.4
204.48154 11.82482 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 4.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.85 Io 1 -1 2 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:18:57.11 +12:47:39.4: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:18:57.11 +12:47:39.4: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461277.9289,13.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260825.4289 13.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.4289 2461277.9289 12.98 06:57:56.38 +14:36:29.8
200.57283 8.01498 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 5.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.444 Gyptis 0 -3 3 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:57:56.38 +14:36:29.8: 14.42 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:57:56.38 +14:36:29.8: 14.15 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461277.9289,12.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260825.4289 12.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
First image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Last image: 2461277.92912956 25.08.2026 10:17:46.794 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.76
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 17323
Objects passed selection criteria: 17275
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 14884.8
Average stars matched: 13768.2 (92.499 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 246464 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 25 05:33:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
First image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Last image: 2461277.92912956 25.08.2026 10:17:46.794 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 138
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 55 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 133739
Objects passed selection criteria: 133419
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 117866
Average stars matched: 110085 (93.3988 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 555656 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 25 05:34:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461277.92865880
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
Image size: 940.8'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:34.415 +13:58:30.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:34.415 +13:58:30.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0435 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
Image size: 940.7'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:36.476 +13:58:22.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:36.476 +13:58:22.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0401 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:34.415 +13:58:30.81
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:36.476 +13:58:22.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00867 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AFsJqydbIO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Q4WyHm8HoS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8Bz6oiHlHo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FoNjGm5u76
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec +8.4645 to +19.3418 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec 8.4645 to 19.3418 deg
Loaded 18986 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13831 out of 15584 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15584 out of 28861 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.899900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.899900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.76
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.14
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.14
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec +8.4645 to +19.3418 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec 8.4645 to 19.3418 deg
Loaded 18986 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13831 out of 15584 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15584 out of 28861 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 25465 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3404 to 114.8465 deg, Dec +8.5626 to +19.2813 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3404 to 114.8465 deg, Dec 8.5626 to 19.2813 deg
Loaded 18669 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13893 out of 14989 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14989 out of 25465 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.5 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
14.9 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.AFsJqydbIO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3379, bad_region=5272, passed=28861
Got 28861 stars (including 20681 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24724 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24724 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24724 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4791 stars left (next iteration limit 5273)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=4791 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.564 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.393 n_q1=1616 n_q2=831 n_q3=1614 n_q4=730 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.171
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Q4WyHm8HoS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=7, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2216, bad_region=6781, passed=25458
Got 25458 stars (including 16979 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25458 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20310 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4841 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20310 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20310 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 4792 stars left (next iteration limit 5273)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=4792 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.601 n_q1=1243 n_q2=1063 n_q3=1368 n_q4=1118 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.169
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.8Bz6oiHlHo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=579, bad_region=518, passed=9385
Got 9385 stars (including 8302 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9385 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4840 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9054 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4840 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9054 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9054 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 4772 stars left (next iteration limit 5247)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4772 robust_rms=5.342 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.278 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4772 robust_rms=0.674 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.712 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4772 robust_rms=0.569 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.587 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4772 robust_rms_before=1.213 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.554 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.569 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.603 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.587
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.603 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits N_match=4772 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.597 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.584 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.465 n_q1=1757 n_q2=607 n_q3=1729 n_q4=679 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.095
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.FoNjGm5u76 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=571, bad_region=541, passed=9304
Got 9304 stars (including 8200 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9304 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4835 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4772 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4835 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4770 stars left (next iteration limit 5248)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4770 robust_rms=5.227 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.460 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4770 robust_rms=0.670 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.702 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4770 robust_rms=0.568 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.602 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4770 robust_rms_before=1.236 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.560 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.568 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.626 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.602
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.626 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits N_match=4770 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.593 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.618 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.486 n_q1=1759 n_q2=609 n_q3=1726 n_q4=676 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.104
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits sigma_overall=0.481 worst_q_ratio=1.171
ref2=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits sigma_overall=0.514 worst_q_ratio=1.169
new1=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits sigma_overall=0.545 worst_q_ratio=1.095
new2=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits sigma_overall=0.560 worst_q_ratio=1.104
reference average sigma_overall=0.4975 worst_q_ratio=1.17
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064_astrometric_residuals.png (4791 matched stars from wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034_astrometric_residuals.png (4792 matched stars from wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373_astrometric_residuals.png (4772 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374_astrometric_residuals.png (4770 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.52 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34451_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 34451_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:55.75 +12:58:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34453_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 34453_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:08.74 +10:45:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34457_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 34457_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:57.45 +13:56:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03781_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 03781_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:42.59 +10:01:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
Image size: 940.8'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:34.415 +13:58:30.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:34.415 +13:58:30.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0435 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
Image size: 940.7'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:36.476 +13:58:22.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:36.476 +13:58:22.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0401 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:34.415 +13:58:30.81
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:36.476 +13:58:22.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00867 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GYEUzCFnon
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JEymHr3Rf4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lKZUrfegWi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits &> /tmp/tmp.g01faWwU6N
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec +8.4557 to +19.3457 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec 8.4557 to 19.3457 deg
Loaded 19038 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10463 out of 16396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16396 out of 208537 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.735100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.735100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec +8.4557 to +19.3457 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec 8.4557 to 19.3457 deg
Loaded 19038 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10463 out of 16396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16396 out of 208537 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 174030 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3404 to 114.8535 deg, Dec +8.5565 to +19.2859 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3404 to 114.8535 deg, Dec 8.5565 to 19.2859 deg
Loaded 18692 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11904 out of 16168 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16168 out of 174030 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 103 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
15.2 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.GYEUzCFnon (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=42, blended=33805, bad_region=29686, passed=208495
Got 208495 stars (including 147891 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 208495 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4818 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 185465 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4818 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 185465 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 185465 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4778 stars left (next iteration limit 5255)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=4778 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=1556 n_q2=875 n_q3=1578 n_q4=769 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.219
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.JEymHr3Rf4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=45, blended=23358, bad_region=33384, passed=173985
Got 173985 stars (including 122046 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 173985 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4814 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150440 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4814 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150440 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150440 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 4777 stars left (next iteration limit 5255)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=4777 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.586 n_q1=1276 n_q2=1027 n_q3=1377 n_q4=1097 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.lKZUrfegWi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=5519, bad_region=3220, passed=79633
Got 79633 stars (including 70891 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 79633 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4774 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77739 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77739 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77739 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 4778 stars left (next iteration limit 5250)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4778 robust_rms=5.335 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.937 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4778 robust_rms=0.676 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.710 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4778 robust_rms=0.576 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.607 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4778 robust_rms_before=1.227 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.553 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.576 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.603 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.607
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.603 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits N_match=4778 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.543 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.599 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.598 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.469 n_q1=1805 n_q2=633 n_q3=1647 n_q4=693 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.104
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.g01faWwU6N (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=5773, bad_region=3492, passed=81743
Got 81743 stars (including 72473 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 81743 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4829 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4773 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79635 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79634 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79634 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 4771 stars left (next iteration limit 5248)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=5.309 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.129 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=0.665 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.690 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=0.565 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.605 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4771 robust_rms_before=1.244 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.557 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.565 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.606 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.605
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.606 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits N_match=4771 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.555 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.604 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.613 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.471 n_q1=1807 n_q2=645 n_q3=1632 n_q4=687 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.104
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_053031_TTUQ2b1x1_3165461_r8imOYwm/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:15:37.34 +10:39:59.8: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:47:41.52 +15:03:11.3: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:02:06.00 +15:11:39.1: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:59:29.16 +12:19:44.2: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:39:24.62 +12:29:25.8: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:48:20.02 +11:20:23.3: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:47:41.52 +15:03:11.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:02:06.00 +15:11:39.1: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:15:37.34 +10:39:59.8: 13.10 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:47:41.52 +15:03:11.3: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8048 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:02:06.00 +15:11:39.1: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3966 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:37.34 +10:39:59.8: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4359 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:43:15.80 +15:57:25.2: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:49:26.09 +14:20:39.0: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:59:29.16 +12:19:44.2: 13.03 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:39:24.62 +12:29:25.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:59:29.16 +12:19:44.2: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2430 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:39:24.62 +12:29:25.8: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0764 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:48:20.02 +11:20:23.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:48:20.02 +11:20:23.3: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3500 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:49:26.09 +14:20:39.0: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:49:26.09 +14:20:39.0: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2033 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:43:15.80 +15:57:25.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:15.80 +15:57:25.2: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2270 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:45:32.16 +09:39:58.0: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:20:02.06 +16:15:57.3: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:44:53.63 +14:09:58.9: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:45:32.16 +09:39:58.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:45:32.16 +09:39:58.0: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0856 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:20:02.06 +16:15:57.3: 12.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:02.06 +16:15:57.3: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4446 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:42:26.75 +11:58:06.8: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:23:44.16 +16:43:43.0: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:44:53.63 +14:09:58.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:44:53.63 +14:09:58.9: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6402 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:42:26.75 +11:58:06.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:42:26.75 +11:58:06.8: ref_mag=11.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9666 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:23:44.16 +16:43:43.0: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:23:44.16 +16:43:43.0: ref_mag=11.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9201 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:41:13.66 +11:02:16.6: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:40:20.76 +12:02:12.4: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:41:13.66 +11:02:16.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:13.66 +11:02:16.6: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6734 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:42:33.24 +10:50:00.2: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:24:07.60 +17:18:58.1: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:40:20.76 +12:02:12.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:40:20.76 +12:02:12.4: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0078 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:49:54.51 +10:51:46.8: 13.24 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:41:01.06 +09:32:44.3: 13.12 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:45:29.01 +15:27:49.7: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:42:33.24 +10:50:00.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:24:07.60 +17:18:58.1: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:42:33.24 +10:50:00.2: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2225 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:45:59.75 +16:15:58.3: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:49:54.51 +10:51:46.8: 13.30 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:41:01.06 +09:32:44.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:01.06 +09:32:44.3: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2053 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:49:54.51 +10:51:46.8: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1964 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:45:29.01 +15:27:49.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:45:29.01 +15:27:49.7: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2421 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:17:00.23 +17:19:16.3: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:45:59.75 +16:15:58.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:45:59.75 +16:15:58.3: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2634 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:22:51.05 +15:16:59.3: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:17:00.23 +17:19:16.3: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:17:00.23 +17:19:16.3: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1060 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:22:51.05 +15:16:59.3: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:22:51.05 +15:16:59.3: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1534 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:17:01.80 +14:07:48.4: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:13:58.07 +11:51:49.5: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:54:26.38 +14:38:35.9: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:18:57.11 +12:47:39.4: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:17:01.80 +14:07:48.4: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:17:01.80 +14:07:48.4: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2805 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:13:58.07 +11:51:49.5: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:58.07 +11:51:49.5: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2789 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:54:26.38 +14:38:35.9: 13.46 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:18:57.11 +12:47:39.4: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:26.38 +14:38:35.9: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4503 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:57:56.38 +14:36:29.8: 14.42 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:57:56.38 +14:36:29.8: 14.15 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:57:56.38 +14:36:29.8: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.9800 delta=1.30 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out121312.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out249242.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out249375.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248980_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 248980_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:07.23 +14:39:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248988_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 248988_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248995_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 248995_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:47.98 +17:03:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249003_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249003_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:50.51 +13:25:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249006_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249006_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:11.89 +17:59:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249008_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249008_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249013_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249013_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249014_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249014_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:07.03 +12:58:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249030_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249030_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:32.58 +13:15:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249035_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249035_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:49.80 +11:45:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249038_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249038_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:58.11 +13:47:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249039_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249039_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:01.96 +11:00:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249040_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249040_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249041_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249041_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:00.90 +09:40:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249042_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249042_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249045_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249045_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:42.37 +15:04:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249046_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249046_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249049_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249049_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249053_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249053_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249055_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249055_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:54.69 +10:24:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249057_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249057_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:01.84 +12:09:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249059_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249059_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:05.24 +13:19:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249060_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249060_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249061_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249061_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:04.78 +13:39:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249065_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249065_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:53.98 +12:32:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249077_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249077_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:05.65 +13:23:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249078_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249078_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249081_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249081_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:53.71 +11:05:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249083_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249083_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249084_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249084_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:44.49 +10:01:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249086_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249086_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:17.17 +10:23:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249087_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249087_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:45.01 +13:06:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249089_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249089_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:47.46 +15:10:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249090_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249090_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249093_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249093_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249110_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249110_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:09.80 +16:09:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249116_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249116_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:49.50 +09:53:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249119_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249119_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:40.78 +16:09:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249122_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249122_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:56.20 +13:15:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249128_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249128_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:25.66 +16:11:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249135_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249135_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:17.46 +10:38:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249149_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249149_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:04.45 +09:51:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249153_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249153_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:08.08 +16:04:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249168_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249168_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:50.06 +12:33:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249170_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249170_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:13.11 +15:07:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249177_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249177_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249191_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249191_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:29.11 +12:08:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249193_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249193_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:14.53 +10:36:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249195_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249195_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:38.56 +16:09:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249200_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249200_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249204_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249204_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:33.38 +17:27:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249215_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249215_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:09.43 +14:14:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249221_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249221_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:16.59 +15:18:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249222_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249222_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:38.23 +10:55:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249224_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249224_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:15.87 +09:43:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249225_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249225_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:10.77 +17:50:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249226_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249226_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:45.36 +10:57:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249227_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249227_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249236_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249236_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:54.03 +12:25:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249242_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
Preparing report for the candidate 249242_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249244_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249244_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:59.02 +12:40:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249248_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249248_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:50.75 +16:55:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249252_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249252_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:19.45 +15:47:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249254_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249254_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:51.22 +12:40:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249256_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249256_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249258_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249258_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249262_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249262_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249267_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249267_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:31.51 +10:56:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249268_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249268_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:57.07 +14:13:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249272_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249272_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249279_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249279_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:28.34 +15:40:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249280_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249280_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:55.47 +13:57:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249281_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249281_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:05.43 +12:20:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249282_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249282_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249287_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249287_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249298_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249298_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:13.53 +16:09:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249299_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249299_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:49.25 +09:36:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249310_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249310_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:51.89 +13:57:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249320_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249320_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:42.84 +10:43:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249323_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249323_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:16.07 +13:51:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249330_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249330_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:06.04 +11:00:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249332_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249332_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249334_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249334_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:23.11 +12:01:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249336_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249336_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249339_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249339_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:35.52 +15:19:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249350_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249350_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:35.85 +14:21:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249353_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249353_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:56.92 +13:42:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249360_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249360_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249375_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
Preparing report for the candidate 249375_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249379_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249379_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249382_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249382_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:26.94 +14:38:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249397_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249397_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:56.28 +13:47:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249398_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249398_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:52.38 +13:23:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249413_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 249413_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121312_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
Preparing report for the candidate 121312_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51429_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 51429_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:44.06 +11:24:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89197_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 89197_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:55.79 +12:58:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106125_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 106125_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:57.46 +13:56:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228069_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 228069_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:29.76 +13:18:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190647_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 190647_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:33.40 +16:51:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41021_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 41021_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:08.74 +10:45:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115100_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 115100_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27049_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374
The candidate 27049_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-17-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0374 did not pass the final checks