This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_053120_TTUQ1b1x1_3156799_9k1Shx8w
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.4377 2461277.9377 12.66 04:23:17.32 +24:34:03.9
172.44216 -17.33492 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales 0 -1 1 12.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:23:17.32 +24:34:03.9: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:23:17.32 +24:34:03.9: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 25.4377* 04 23 17.32 +24 34 03.9 12.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461277.9377,12.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260825.4377 12.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.4377 2461277.9377 13.88 03:26:40.61 +33:24:50.3
156.55563 -19.13387 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.762 Pulcova -0 1 1 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:26:40.61 +33:24:50.3: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:26:40.61 +33:24:50.3: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 25.4377* 03 26 40.61 +33 24 50.3 13.9 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461277.9377,13.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260825.4377 13.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.4377 2461277.9377 13.97 04:15:24.86 +26:09:08.2
169.95699 -17.56781 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.224 Oceana 1 1 1 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:15:24.86 +26:09:08.2: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:15:24.86 +26:09:08.2: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 25.4377* 04 15 24.86 +26 09 08.2 14.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461277.9377,13.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260825.4377 13.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.4377 2461277.9377 14.26 04:22:04.16 +24:49:06.6
172.05275 -17.37277 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.418 Alemannia -0 -1 1 14.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:22:04.16 +24:49:06.6: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:22:04.16 +24:49:06.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 25.4377* 04 22 04.16 +24 49 06.6 14.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461277.9377,14.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260825.4377 14.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.4377 2461277.9377 14.53 03:25:37.36 +32:30:47.7
156.93045 -19.99146 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.683 Lanzia -0 0 0 14.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:25:37.36 +32:30:47.7: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:25:37.36 +32:30:47.7: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 25.4377* 03 25 37.36 +32 30 47.7 14.5 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461277.9377,14.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260825.4377 14.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.4377 2461277.9377 14.46 04:16:28.73 +30:32:34.7
166.83354 -14.35566 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.573 Recha 0 -0 0 14.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:16:28.73 +30:32:34.7: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:16:28.73 +30:32:34.7: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 25.4377* 04 16 28.73 +30 32 34.7 14.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461277.9377,14.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260825.4377 14.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
First image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Last image: 2461277.93799984 25.08.2026 10:30:33.186 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_053120_TTUQ1b1x1_3156799_9k1Shx8w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 16
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13568
Objects passed selection criteria: 13562
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12962
Average stars matched: 12601.5 (97.2188 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 239356 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 25 05:32:30 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
First image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Last image: 2461277.93799984 25.08.2026 10:30:33.186 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_053120_TTUQ1b1x1_3156799_9k1Shx8w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 136
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 39 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 93090
Objects passed selection criteria: 92896
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 85825.8
Average stars matched: 83122.8 (96.8506 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 480872 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 25 05:34:00 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_053120_TTUQ1b1x1_3156799_9k1Shx8w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_053120_TTUQ1b1x1_3156799_9k1Shx8w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_053120_TTUQ1b1x1_3156799_9k1Shx8w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_053120_TTUQ1b1x1_3156799_9k1Shx8w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461277.93732219
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:40.963 +30:01:53.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48
Second-epoch image center 03:59:40.963 +30:01:53.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0751 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:43.726 +30:01:57.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48
Second-epoch image center 03:59:43.726 +30:01:57.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0668 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:59:40.963 +30:01:53.76
Second-epoch second image center 03:59:43.726 +30:01:57.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01003 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FGfbkLbjdW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wCSblBfIjv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_053120_TTUQ1b1x1_3156799_9k1Shx8w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HHZdUmvKcx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_053120_TTUQ1b1x1_3156799_9k1Shx8w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_053120_TTUQ1b1x1_3156799_9k1Shx8w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits &> /tmp/tmp.puCWzZJsbH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_053120_TTUQ1b1x1_3156799_9k1Shx8w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3062 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3062 deg
Loaded 7255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5544 out of 6056 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6056 out of 13390 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.967300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.967300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3062 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3062 deg
Loaded 7255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5544 out of 6056 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6056 out of 13390 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 13513 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5733 to 69.6293 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3107 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5733 to 69.6293 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3107 deg
Loaded 7269 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5557 out of 6071 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6071 out of 13513 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 15 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
2.0 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
2.9 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
2.8 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.FGfbkLbjdW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_053120_TTUQ1b1x1_3156799_9k1Shx8w/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1130, bad_region=0, passed=13390
Got 13390 stars (including 12252 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1524 n_q2=1103 n_q3=892 n_q4=1376 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.233
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.wCSblBfIjv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_053120_TTUQ1b1x1_3156799_9k1Shx8w/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1130, bad_region=0, passed=13513
Got 13513 stars (including 12361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13513 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5388)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1523 n_q2=1108 n_q3=895 n_q4=1373 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.288
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.HHZdUmvKcx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_053120_TTUQ1b1x1_3156799_9k1Shx8w/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_053120_TTUQ1b1x1_3156799_9k1Shx8w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_053120_TTUQ1b1x1_3156799_9k1Shx8w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_053120_TTUQ1b1x1_3156799_9k1Shx8w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_053120_TTUQ1b1x1_3156799_9k1Shx8w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_053120_TTUQ1b1x1_3156799_9k1Shx8w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_053120_TTUQ1b1x1_3156799_9k1Shx8w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_053120_TTUQ1b1x1_3156799_9k1Shx8w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=738, bad_region=0, passed=12635
Got 12635 stars (including 11884 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12635 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12635 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12635 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12635 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4886 stars left (next iteration limit 5374)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=9.114 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.374 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=0.330 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.351 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=0.276 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.320 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4886 robust_rms_before=0.898 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.303 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.276 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.360 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.320
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:40.984 +30:01:52.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 12635 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_053120_TTUQ1b1x1_3156799_9k1Shx8w/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3221696.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.898 -> 0.276 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits N_match=4886 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=1352 n_q2=872 n_q3=1168 n_q4=1494 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.178
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_053120_TTUQ1b1x1_3156799_9k1Shx8w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.puCWzZJsbH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_053120_TTUQ1b1x1_3156799_9k1Shx8w/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_053120_TTUQ1b1x1_3156799_9k1Shx8w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_053120_TTUQ1b1x1_3156799_9k1Shx8w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_053120_TTUQ1b1x1_3156799_9k1Shx8w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_053120_TTUQ1b1x1_3156799_9k1Shx8w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_053120_TTUQ1b1x1_3156799_9k1Shx8w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_053120_TTUQ1b1x1_3156799_9k1Shx8w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_053120_TTUQ1b1x1_3156799_9k1Shx8w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=697, bad_region=0, passed=12610
Got 12610 stars (including 11898 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12610 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12610 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12610 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12610 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5379)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=9.146 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.542 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=0.321 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.336 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=0.260 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.313 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4890 robust_rms_before=0.899 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.289 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.260 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.360 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.313
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:43.748 +30:01:56.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 12610 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_053120_TTUQ1b1x1_3156799_9k1Shx8w/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3221613.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.899 -> 0.260 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.267 n_q1=1345 n_q2=875 n_q3=1172 n_q4=1498 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.219
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_053120_TTUQ1b1x1_3156799_9k1Shx8w/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits sigma_overall=0.339 worst_q_ratio=1.233
ref2=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits sigma_overall=0.337 worst_q_ratio=1.288
new1=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits sigma_overall=0.287 worst_q_ratio=1.178
new2=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits sigma_overall=0.275 worst_q_ratio=1.219
reference average sigma_overall=0.338 worst_q_ratio=1.2605
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_astrometric_residuals.png (4895 matched stars from wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_astrometric_residuals.png (4899 matched stars from wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316_astrometric_residuals.png (4886 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317_astrometric_residuals.png (4890 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.22 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_053120_TTUQ1b1x1_3156799_9k1Shx8w/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-29-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0316.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_053120_TTUQ1b1x1_3156799_9k1Shx8w/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:04:06.85 +30:42:41.5: 12.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:02:05.10 +31:23:51.6: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:38:19.09 +32:03:13.3: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:43:52.31 +25:16:24.8: 10.94 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:26:56.53 +34:22:43.7: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:57:17.92 +32:06:19.5: 13.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:48:02.68 +29:49:37.7: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:07:06.11 +30:10:48.2: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:02:05.10 +31:23:51.6: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:04:06.85 +30:42:41.5: 12.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:43:52.31 +25:16:24.8: 10.92 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:38:19.09 +32:03:13.3: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:05.10 +31:23:51.6: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4936 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:06.85 +30:42:41.5: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4989 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.93 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:52.31 +25:16:24.8: ref_mag=10.93 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4662 delta=-0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:38:19.09 +32:03:13.3: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3664 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:26:56.53 +34:22:43.7: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:56.53 +34:22:43.7: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5348 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:57:17.92 +32:06:19.5: 13.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:48:02.68 +29:49:37.7: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:07:06.11 +30:10:48.2: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:17.92 +32:06:19.5: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5259 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:02.68 +29:49:37.7: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5654 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:06.11 +30:10:48.2: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5085 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20884_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 20884_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20885_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 20885_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:35:43.84 +25:42:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20995_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 20995_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:15.19 +33:48:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21006_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 21006_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:56.04 +30:22:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21017_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 21017_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:14:17.03 +28:10:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21024_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 21024_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:48.00 +31:30:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21025_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 21025_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21051_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 21051_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21052_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 21052_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:04.84 +25:42:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21060_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 21060_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21061_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 21061_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21065_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 21065_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21066_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 21066_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21079_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 21079_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01673_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 01673_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117544_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 117544_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117546_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 117546_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117550_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 117550_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117560_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 117560_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117563_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 117563_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117571_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 117571_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117572_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 117572_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:41.30 +33:17:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117579_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 117579_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117582_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 117582_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117586_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 117586_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117588_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 117588_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117590_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 117590_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117597_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 117597_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:37:47.92 +27:21:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117604_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 117604_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117609_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 117609_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117610_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 117610_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117612_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 117612_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:29:49.17 +29:06:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117613_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 117613_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117614_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 117614_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:24.78 +28:20:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117616_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 117616_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117617_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 117617_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117619_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 117619_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117621_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 117621_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117736_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 117736_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:49.11 +33:34:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117790_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 117790_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117795_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 117795_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117817_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 117817_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:04.34 +25:32:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117854_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
Preparing report for the candidate 117854_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117903_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 117903_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:31.54 +33:49:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117912_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 117912_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117917_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 117917_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:32.85 +33:50:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117947_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 117947_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117996_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 117996_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:29.76 +33:27:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118013_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118013_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:06.68 +33:36:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118017_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118017_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:48.23 +27:33:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118033_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118033_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:11.43 +25:53:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118077_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118077_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:56.39 +33:34:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118097_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118097_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118114_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118114_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:17.90 +33:49:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118125_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118125_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118138_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118138_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118140_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118140_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:00:28.17 +33:18:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118143_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118143_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118153_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118153_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:50.87 +34:50:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118189_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118189_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118211_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118211_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:06.05 +32:33:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118216_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
Preparing report for the candidate 118216_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118218_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118218_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118222_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118222_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118229_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118229_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:14.33 +34:32:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118249_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118249_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118252_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118252_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:39.95 +32:28:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118256_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118256_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118266_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118266_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:31:35.40 +34:40:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118271_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118271_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:01:50.68 +32:12:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118284_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118284_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118289_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118289_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118300_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118300_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118317_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
Preparing report for the candidate 118317_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118336_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118336_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118343_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118343_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118347_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118347_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118348_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118348_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:40:52.54 +25:19:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118384_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118384_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118385_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118385_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118412_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118412_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118429_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118429_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118432_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118432_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118451_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118451_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118461_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118461_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118468_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118468_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:41.98 +30:27:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118488_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118488_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118489_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118489_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:49.29 +34:28:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118492_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118492_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118494_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118494_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118498_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118498_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118523_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118523_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:53.66 +32:27:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118527_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118527_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118539_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118539_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:24.54 +31:03:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118543_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118543_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118574_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118574_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118576_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118576_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118585_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118585_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118590_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
Preparing report for the candidate 118590_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118598_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118598_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118599_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118599_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118604_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
Preparing report for the candidate 118604_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118625_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118625_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118660_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118660_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118691_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
Preparing report for the candidate 118691_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118726_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118726_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118748_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118748_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118854_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118854_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118860_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118860_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118876_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118876_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118897_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118897_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118928_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118928_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118945_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118945_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118952_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118952_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118957_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118957_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118962_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118962_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118975_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118975_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118998_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 118998_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119039_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 119039_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119041_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 119041_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119044_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 119044_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119052_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 119052_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:41.83 +33:58:46.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=15.18, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=16.16)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.239 218742791763806720 058.67424844551 +33.97941619603 15.0627 14.2176 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.239#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119084_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 119084_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119102_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 119102_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119112_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 119112_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119114_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 119114_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110522_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 110522_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:16.24 +33:02:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117168_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 117168_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72300_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 72300_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:47:34.37 +26:16:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113187_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 113187_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52535_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 52535_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:56.06 +30:22:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96483_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 96483_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:14:17.04 +28:10:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81784_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 81784_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:01.05 +28:53:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84145_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 84145_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:01.74 +27:15:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11217_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 11217_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:15.26 +33:48:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11025_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 11025_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:38.01 +34:15:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54567_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 54567_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:50.19 +29:42:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19172_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317
The candidate 19172_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-30-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0317 did not pass the final checks
