This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.4159 2461277.9159 14.11 04:15:23.53 +26:09:00.9
169.95494 -17.57282 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.224 Oceana -0 -1 1 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:15:23.53 +26:09:00.9: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:15:23.53 +26:09:00.9: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 25.4159* 04 15 23.53 +26 09 00.9 14.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461277.9159,14.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260825.4159 14.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.4159 2461277.9159 14.39 04:16:27.31 +30:32:26.4
166.83158 -14.36092 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.573 Recha -0 -0 0 14.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:16:27.31 +30:32:26.4: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:16:27.31 +30:32:26.4: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 25.4159* 04 16 27.31 +30 32 26.4 14.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461277.9159,14.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260825.4159 14.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 25.4159* 04 12 03.46 +31 57 29.8 14.7 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461277.9159,14.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260825.4159 14.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
First image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Last image: 2461277.91622635 25.08.2026 09:59:11.957 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 12133
Objects passed selection criteria: 12087
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9736.25
Average stars matched: 9023 (92.6743 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 236984 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 25 05:14:11 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
First image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Last image: 2461277.91622635 25.08.2026 09:59:11.957 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 111
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.14
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 73 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 89750
Objects passed selection criteria: 89469
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 72980.8
Average stars matched: 67701 (92.7656 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 475892 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 25 05:16:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461277.91553623
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:00:00.854 +29:59:58.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48
Second-epoch image center 04:00:00.854 +29:59:58.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0044 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:58.580 +30:00:28.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48
Second-epoch image center 03:59:58.580 +30:00:28.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0101 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:00:00.854 +29:59:58.88
Second-epoch second image center 03:59:58.580 +30:00:28.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01168 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.u3ZbHrv9m5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wu85KGc1TJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9oMJTgrv7Z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DVi4qhTrnL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3062 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3062 deg
Loaded 7255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5544 out of 6056 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6056 out of 13390 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.967300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.967300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3062 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3062 deg
Loaded 7255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5544 out of 6056 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6056 out of 13390 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 13513 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5733 to 69.6293 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3107 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5733 to 69.6293 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3107 deg
Loaded 7269 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5557 out of 6071 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6071 out of 13513 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
2.0 pix Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.u3ZbHrv9m5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1130, bad_region=2635, passed=13390
Got 13390 stars (including 9811 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4891 stars left (next iteration limit 5380)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=4891 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.274 n_q1=1876 n_q2=849 n_q3=1123 n_q4=1043 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.201
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.wu85KGc1TJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1130, bad_region=2648, passed=13513
Got 13513 stars (including 9913 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13513 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11436 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11436 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11436 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4892 stars left (next iteration limit 5381)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=4892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.264 n_q1=1879 n_q2=855 n_q3=1123 n_q4=1035 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.237
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.9oMJTgrv7Z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=713, bad_region=2239, passed=10959
Got 10959 stars (including 8089 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10959 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9269 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9269 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9269 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4907 stars left (next iteration limit 5396)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4907 robust_rms=6.944 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=7.956 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4907 robust_rms=0.439 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.585 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4907 robust_rms=0.349 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.412 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4907 robust_rms_before=0.886 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.369 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.349 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.415 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.412
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.415 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits N_match=4907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.394 n_q1=1653 n_q2=749 n_q3=1291 n_q4=1214 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.112
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.DVi4qhTrnL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=734, bad_region=2276, passed=11073
Got 11073 stars (including 8167 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11073 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9354 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9354 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9354 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4905 stars left (next iteration limit 5394)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=7.011 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.021 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=0.430 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.578 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=0.336 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.388 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4905 robust_rms_before=0.900 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.358 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.336 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.406 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.388
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.406 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits N_match=4905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.389 n_q1=1656 n_q2=749 n_q3=1287 n_q4=1213 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits sigma_overall=0.346 worst_q_ratio=1.201
ref2=Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits sigma_overall=0.347 worst_q_ratio=1.237
new1=fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits sigma_overall=0.379 worst_q_ratio=1.112
new2=fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits sigma_overall=0.374 worst_q_ratio=1.131
reference average sigma_overall=0.3465 worst_q_ratio=1.219
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_astrometric_residuals.png (4891 matched stars from wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_astrometric_residuals.png (4892 matched stars from wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353_astrometric_residuals.png (4907 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354_astrometric_residuals.png (4905 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:05:36.36 +31:20:46.1: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:50:57.67 +27:24:05.2: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:05:36.36 +31:20:46.1: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:50:57.67 +27:24:05.2: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:36.36 +31:20:46.1: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4586 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:57.67 +27:24:05.2: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3865 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20742_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 20742_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20743_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 20743_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22132_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 22132_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:14:17.05 +28:10:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22293_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 22293_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:56.09 +30:22:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:00:00.854 +29:59:58.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48
Second-epoch image center 04:00:00.854 +29:59:58.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0044 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:58.580 +30:00:28.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48
Second-epoch image center 03:59:58.580 +30:00:28.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0101 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:00:00.854 +29:59:58.88
Second-epoch second image center 03:59:58.580 +30:00:28.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01168 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LSH5H3Y33j
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WME01bi9y9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Uv3hXhil0y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kKJ8VFDjDK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 99190 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5578 to 69.6814 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3061 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5578 to 69.6814 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3061 deg
Loaded 7277 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4826 out of 6103 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6103 out of 99190 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.820500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.820500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.14
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.68
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.68
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 99190 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5578 to 69.6814 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3061 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5578 to 69.6814 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3061 deg
Loaded 7277 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4826 out of 6103 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6103 out of 99190 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 98825 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5581 to 69.6814 deg, Dec +24.3528 to +35.3112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5581 to 69.6814 deg, Dec 24.3528 to 35.3112 deg
Loaded 7286 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4805 out of 6109 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6109 out of 98825 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 90 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
1.9 pix Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
2.1 pix fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.LSH5H3Y33j (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=7855, bad_region=14549, passed=99168
Got 99168 stars (including 77549 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 99168 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4903 stars left (next iteration limit 5393)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=4903 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1838 n_q2=850 n_q3=1185 n_q4=1030 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.195
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.WME01bi9y9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=7957, bad_region=14515, passed=98800
Got 98800 stars (including 77143 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 98800 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87651 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87651 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87651 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5390)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.255 n_q1=1848 n_q2=840 n_q3=1182 n_q4=1030 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.260
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Uv3hXhil0y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=4847, bad_region=12639, passed=75193
Got 75193 stars (including 58432 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 75193 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66258 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66258 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66258 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4911 stars left (next iteration limit 5402)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4911 robust_rms=6.901 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=7.946 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4911 robust_rms=0.440 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.581 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4911 robust_rms=0.352 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.412 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4911 robust_rms_before=0.876 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.371 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.352 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.423 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.412
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.423 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits N_match=4911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.405 n_q1=1692 n_q2=784 n_q3=1265 n_q4=1170 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.149
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.kKJ8VFDjDK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=4834, bad_region=12556, passed=74694
Got 74694 stars (including 58034 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 74694 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4908 stars left (next iteration limit 5398)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4908 robust_rms=6.927 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.002 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4908 robust_rms=0.435 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.576 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4908 robust_rms=0.339 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.388 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4908 robust_rms_before=0.892 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.363 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.339 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.413 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.388
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.413 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits N_match=4908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.397 n_q1=1695 n_q2=771 n_q3=1258 n_q4=1184 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.118
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_050632_TTUQ2b1x1_4099154_SyBIyCZ0/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:47:17.95 +30:42:04.9: 15.07 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:42:55.65 +26:25:34.5: 15.40 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:40:45.31 +29:12:02.2: 14.63 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:12:54.77 +30:31:14.1: 15.02 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:55:46.94 +33:19:08.9: 15.27 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:51:40.12 +31:24:26.7: 14.90 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:56:34.77 +28:19:01.1: 14.75 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:15:18.19 +31:36:35.1: 14.15 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:51:27.63 +27:59:27.0: 14.96 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:41:20.27 +28:51:45.6: 14.85 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:12:54.77 +30:31:14.1: 15.38 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:47:17.95 +30:42:04.9: 15.38 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:42:55.65 +26:25:34.5: 15.14 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:12:54.77 +30:31:14.1: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0516 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:55:46.94 +33:19:08.9: 15.20 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:51:40.12 +31:24:26.7: 14.92 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:40:45.31 +29:12:02.2: 14.51 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:47:17.95 +30:42:04.9: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9355 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:55.65 +26:25:34.5: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.1237 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:15:18.19 +31:36:35.1: 14.12 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:46.94 +33:19:08.9: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.2134 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:45.31 +29:12:02.2: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6499 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:40.12 +31:24:26.7: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.9504 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:15:18.19 +31:36:35.1: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5909 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:51:27.63 +27:59:27.0: 14.96 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:56:34.77 +28:19:01.1: 14.50 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:27.63 +27:59:27.0: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8136 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:34.77 +28:19:01.1: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5556 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:41:20.27 +28:51:45.6: 14.77 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:41:20.27 +28:51:45.6: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6064 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:05:49.97 +25:49:10.4: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:59:12.13 +30:07:44.3: 14.11 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:05:49.97 +25:49:10.4: 13.94 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:49.97 +25:49:10.4: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0266 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:59:12.13 +30:07:44.3: 14.06 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:12.13 +30:07:44.3: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8736 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:04:23.16 +32:58:03.3: 13.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:04:23.16 +32:58:03.3: 13.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:23.16 +32:58:03.3: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5673 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:08:18.22 +33:19:40.6: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:09:38.26 +27:52:57.3: 13.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:19:11.83 +33:01:10.7: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:15:23.53 +26:09:00.9: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:08:18.22 +33:19:40.6: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:09:38.26 +27:52:57.3: 13.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:18.22 +33:19:40.6: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8987 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:38.26 +27:52:57.3: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0100 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:19:11.83 +33:01:10.7: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:11.83 +33:01:10.7: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9968 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:15:23.53 +26:09:00.9: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:20:15.01 +28:47:34.2: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:45:08.70 +29:36:50.2: 14.53 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:20:15.01 +28:47:34.2: 14.17 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:15.01 +28:47:34.2: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1258 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:18:19.96 +29:48:35.4: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:20:25.56 +30:17:19.8: 14.25 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:14:26.04 +31:43:39.2: 14.56 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:45:08.70 +29:36:50.2: 14.47 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:08.70 +29:36:50.2: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4695 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:18:19.96 +29:48:35.4: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:19.96 +29:48:35.4: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2925 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:20:25.56 +30:17:19.8: 14.22 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:25.56 +30:17:19.8: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3375 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:15:49.37 +30:52:47.5: 14.47 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:16:27.31 +30:32:26.4: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:14:26.04 +31:43:39.2: 14.64 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:39:49.60 +28:06:57.7: 14.73 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:09:31.60 +33:29:08.2: 14.21 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:26.04 +31:43:39.2: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4612 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:15:27.77 +33:49:25.2: 14.35 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:15:49.37 +30:52:47.5: 14.44 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:15:49.37 +30:52:47.5: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4654 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:16:27.31 +30:32:26.4: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:09:31.60 +33:29:08.2: 14.27 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:39:49.60 +28:06:57.7: 14.78 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:31.60 +33:29:08.2: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4464 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:39:49.60 +28:06:57.7: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5742 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:11:31.70 +32:56:16.2: 14.87 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:15:27.77 +33:49:25.2: 14.35 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:15:27.77 +33:49:25.2: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6993 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:52:32.68 +32:18:40.5: 15.39 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:53:38.23 +29:29:07.6: 14.93 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:57:18.76 +29:06:20.8: 14.77 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:11:31.70 +32:56:16.2: 14.81 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:31.70 +32:56:16.2: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8498 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:52:32.68 +32:18:40.5: 15.25 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:32.68 +32:18:40.5: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8685 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:53:38.23 +29:29:07.6: 14.82 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:48:20.24 +29:09:47.3: 15.28 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:38.23 +29:29:07.6: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7858 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:57:18.76 +29:06:20.8: 14.84 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:16:34.04 +32:09:46.8: 14.94 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:18.76 +29:06:20.8: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7319 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:48:20.24 +29:09:47.3: 15.65 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:00:01.21 +25:53:04.5: 15.01 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.41 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:20.24 +29:09:47.3: ref_mag=15.41 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9908 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:16:34.04 +32:09:46.8: 14.95 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:16:34.04 +32:09:46.8: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8706 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:08:08.64 +32:15:18.4: 15.00 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:00:01.21 +25:53:04.5: 15.25 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:18:27.97 +33:30:34.3: 15.08 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:01.21 +25:53:04.5: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8703 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:58:40.72 +30:02:41.3: 15.94 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:55:01.63 +31:31:37.9: 14.85 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:08:08.64 +32:15:18.4: 14.89 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:08.64 +32:15:18.4: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.9648 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:18:27.97 +33:30:34.3: 15.03 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:27.97 +33:30:34.3: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8957 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:58:40.72 +30:02:41.3: 15.63 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.74 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:55:01.63 +31:31:37.9: 15.00 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:40.72 +30:02:41.3: ref_mag=15.74 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0233 delta=0.72 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:01.63 +31:31:37.9: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8859 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:17:22.67 +30:06:09.4: 15.14 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:58:53.26 +29:48:07.8: 15.16 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:50:40.58 +32:23:10.4: 15.72 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:17:22.67 +30:06:09.4: 15.49 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:19:17.98 +30:58:10.7: 15.18 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:22.67 +30:06:09.4: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1161 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:50:40.58 +32:23:10.4: 15.72 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.72 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:40.58 +32:23:10.4: ref_mag=15.72 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1159 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:58:53.26 +29:48:07.8: 15.21 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:55:06.64 +26:10:41.3: 15.92 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:53.26 +29:48:07.8: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0507 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:03:11.30 +28:07:27.2: 15.53 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:48:05.70 +25:58:04.5: 15.53 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:19:17.98 +30:58:10.7: 15.26 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:17.98 +30:58:10.7: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0795 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:55:06.64 +26:10:41.3: 15.82 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.86 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:06.64 +26:10:41.3: ref_mag=15.86 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=15.2665 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:48:05.70 +25:58:04.5: 15.74 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:03:11.30 +28:07:27.2: 15.68 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.59 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.61 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:11.30 +28:07:27.2: ref_mag=15.59 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.2794 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:05.70 +25:58:04.5: ref_mag=15.61 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.2019 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out122799.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out124981.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116422_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 116422_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116435_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 116435_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116437_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 116437_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116438_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 116438_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116442_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 116442_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116446_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 116446_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116458_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 116458_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116468_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 116468_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116470_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 116470_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116473_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 116473_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116474_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 116474_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116479_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 116479_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:00.98 +31:09:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116486_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 116486_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116490_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 116490_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116492_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 116492_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:05:28.98 +28:25:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116494_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 116494_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:18.47 +28:09:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116495_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 116495_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:36.29 +33:59:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116497_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 116497_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:16:41.01 +34:03:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116498_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 116498_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:16.86 +26:50:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116499_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 116499_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:29.19 +27:36:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116501_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 116501_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:41:25.51 +25:51:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116502_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 116502_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:42.37 +26:53:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118875_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 118875_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:01:55.87 +31:58:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119334_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 119334_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:31.52 +33:49:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119710_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 119710_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:32.76 +33:50:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119797_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 119797_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:24.88 +32:27:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120311_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 120311_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:06.82 +33:36:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120377_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 120377_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:29.72 +33:27:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120904_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 120904_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120978_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 120978_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:19.80 +26:53:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121040_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 121040_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:21.22 +33:28:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121160_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 121160_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:17.99 +33:49:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121598_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 121598_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:48.23 +27:33:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121666_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 121666_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:35.76 +28:11:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121673_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 121673_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:06.05 +33:36:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121819_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 121819_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:00:28.15 +33:18:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121908_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 121908_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:36.58 +31:21:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122009_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 122009_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122113_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 122113_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:01:50.80 +32:12:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122328_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 122328_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122494_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 122494_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122567_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 122567_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:44.24 +30:46:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122582_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 122582_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:06.08 +32:33:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122590_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 122590_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:30.90 +31:30:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122799_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
Preparing report for the candidate 122799_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123020_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 123020_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:03:03.25 +28:26:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123098_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 123098_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:58:59.92 +32:00:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123147_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 123147_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:45.50 +31:40:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123237_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 123237_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:10.82 +29:43:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123293_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 123293_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123400_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 123400_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:00.88 +29:49:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123809_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 123809_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:07.87 +32:01:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124010_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 124010_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124014_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 124014_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124167_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 124167_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:50:05.70 +26:02:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124189_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 124189_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124263_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 124263_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:03:49.53 +29:10:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124318_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 124318_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:29.24 +28:09:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124403_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 124403_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:11.70 +32:04:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124469_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 124469_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124899_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 124899_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124981_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
Preparing report for the candidate 124981_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125618_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 125618_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125755_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 125755_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126266_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 126266_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126389_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 126389_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126428_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 126428_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126448_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 126448_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126664_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 126664_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126733_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
Preparing report for the candidate 126733_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126846_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 126846_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126884_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 126884_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126894_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 126894_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127113_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 127113_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127263_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 127263_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127554_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 127554_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127603_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 127603_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127716_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 127716_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127819_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 127819_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127887_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 127887_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127968_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 127968_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128127_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 128127_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128174_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 128174_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128216_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 128216_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128290_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 128290_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110370_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 110370_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:16.41 +33:01:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52535_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 52535_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:56.14 +30:22:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96483_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 96483_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:14:17.03 +28:10:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110249_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 110249_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:18.78 +33:14:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84145_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354
The candidate 84145_fd_Tau-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-59-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0354 did not pass the final checks