This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461277.8900,6.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260825.3900 6.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.3900 2461277.8900 9.01 06:18:19.86 +22:39:02.9
189.10407 3.28886 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1 Ceres 0 0 1 8.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:18:19.86 +22:39:02.9: 15.10 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:18:19.86 +22:39:02.9: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.21
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461277.8900,9.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260825.3900 9.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461277.8900,6.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260825.3900 6.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.3900 2461277.8900 11.11 06:41:56.68 +22:39:48.2
191.58438 8.14560 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.27 Euterpe -0 -0 0 11.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:41:56.68 +22:39:48.2: 14.92 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:41:56.68 +22:39:48.2: 14.36 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461277.8900,11.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260825.3900 11.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.3900 2461277.8900 12.04 06:03:34.14 +24:32:44.0
185.81378 1.23533 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.5 pix
The object was found in VSX20" ZTF J060334.38+243224.1
Type: RS
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.326 r Y 0.269 r 2458514.62300 3.662469800000
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the variable-star record above, but is consistent with the asteroid identification below - so this is likely the asteroid rather than an outburst of the variable.
The object was found in astcheck.22 Kalliope 0 1 1 12.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:03:34.14 +24:32:44.0: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:03:34.14 +24:32:44.0: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J060334.38+243224.1,2461277.8900,12.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J060334.38+243224.1 20260825.3900 12.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.3900 2461277.8900 13.24 06:05:11.81 +23:15:10.4
187.12299 0.92553 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.179 Klytaemnestra -2 -1 3 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:05:11.81 +23:15:10.4: 15.16 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:05:11.81 +23:15:10.4: 14.87 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.13
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461277.8900,13.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260825.3900 13.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.3900 2461277.8900 13.61 06:01:40.08 +22:01:30.0
187.79131 -0.38749 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.76 Freia 1 -1 1 13.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:01:40.08 +22:01:30.0: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:01:40.08 +22:01:30.0: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461277.8900,13.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260825.3900 13.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.3900 2461277.8900 13.16 06:32:21.90 +18:48:06.9
194.04622 4.41210 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.712 Boliviana 1 -0 1 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:32:21.90 +18:48:06.9: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:32:21.90 +18:48:06.9: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461277.8900,13.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260825.3900 13.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.3900 2461277.8900 11.98 06:45:54.63 +24:18:25.7
190.48664 9.67944 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.30 Urania -0 -1 1 12.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:45:54.63 +24:18:25.7: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:45:54.63 +24:18:25.7: 15.73 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.73 +/- 0.32
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461277.8900,11.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260825.3900 11.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.3900 2461277.8900 12.58 06:15:50.68 +18:34:45.1
192.41657 0.84762 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 8.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J061550.65+183444.4
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.280 V 14.730 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:15:50.68 +18:34:45.1: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:15:50.68 +18:34:45.1: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 25.3900* 06 15 50.68 +18 34 45.1 12.6 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J061550.65+183444.4,2461277.8900,12.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J061550.65+183444.4 20260825.3900 12.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.3900 2461277.8900 12.57 06:22:24.69 +19:47:54.4
192.07323 2.78997 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 8.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" ASASSN-V J062224.95+194751.8
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.750 V 14.020 V 2457333.00000 188.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:22:24.69 +19:47:54.4: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:22:24.69 +19:47:54.4: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J062224.95+194751.8,2461277.8900,12.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J062224.95+194751.8 20260825.3900 12.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
First image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Last image: 2461277.89034493 25.08.2026 09:21:55.802 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.79
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 27635
Objects passed selection criteria: 27565
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 20102.2
Average stars matched: 18977.5 (94.4049 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 253292 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 25 04:23:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
First image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Last image: 2461277.89034493 25.08.2026 09:21:55.802 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 125
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 61 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 176895
Objects passed selection criteria: 176495
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 132174
Average stars matched: 127914 (96.777 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 642756 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 25 04:25:55 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461277.88966006
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
Image size: 944.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:40.331 +22:03:59.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:40.331 +22:03:59.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0583 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Image size: 944.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:43.090 +22:04:34.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:43.090 +22:04:34.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0690 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:27:40.331 +22:03:59.60
Second-epoch second image center 06:27:43.090 +22:04:34.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01439 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rkv3T4TzcT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BtzJvsEsjh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HfLuxLrF2V
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9y7pkT1JAa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec +16.3282 to +27.3630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec 16.3282 to 27.3630 deg
Loaded 19945 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14221 out of 15960 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15960 out of 29338 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.881900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.881900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.79
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec +16.3282 to +27.3630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec 16.3282 to 27.3630 deg
Loaded 19945 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14221 out of 15960 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15960 out of 29338 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 31529 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 88.2224 to 105.7491 deg, Dec +16.5172 to +27.2358 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 88.2224 to 105.7491 deg, Dec 16.5172 to 27.2358 deg
Loaded 19341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14457 out of 15956 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15956 out of 31529 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.5 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
2.9 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
2.9 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
15.1 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.rkv3T4TzcT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3278, bad_region=0, passed=29338
Got 29338 stars (including 26023 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4818 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4876 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4819 stars left (next iteration limit 5298)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4819 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=1143 n_q2=1240 n_q3=1197 n_q4=1239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.BtzJvsEsjh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3030, bad_region=0, passed=31529
Got 31529 stars (including 28473 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31529 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 4816 stars left (next iteration limit 5296)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits N_match=4816 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.684 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.619 n_q1=1184 n_q2=1326 n_q3=1090 n_q4=1216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.289
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.HfLuxLrF2V (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=535, bad_region=0, passed=9974
Got 9974 stars (including 9429 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9974 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013118 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010494 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.3 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.3 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4784 stars left (next iteration limit 5264)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4784 robust_rms=6.212 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.879 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4784 robust_rms=0.479 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.995 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4784 robust_rms=0.392 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.540 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4784 robust_rms_before=1.288 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.453 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.392 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.526 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.540
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.526 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits N_match=4784 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.536 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.452 n_q1=1468 n_q2=721 n_q3=1652 n_q4=943 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.9y7pkT1JAa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=538, bad_region=0, passed=10047
Got 10047 stars (including 9500 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10047 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013117 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010493 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.3 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10039 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.3 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10039 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10039 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4783 stars left (next iteration limit 5261)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4783 robust_rms=6.197 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.833 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4783 robust_rms=0.457 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.546 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4783 robust_rms=0.405 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.514 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4783 robust_rms_before=1.236 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.450 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.405 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.524 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.514
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.524 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits N_match=4783 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.526 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.459 n_q1=1491 n_q2=713 n_q3=1660 n_q4=919 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.189
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.370 worst_q_ratio=1.175
ref2=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits sigma_overall=0.530 worst_q_ratio=1.289
new1=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits sigma_overall=0.455 worst_q_ratio=1.177
new2=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits sigma_overall=0.442 worst_q_ratio=1.189
reference average sigma_overall=0.45 worst_q_ratio=1.232
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (4819 matched stars from wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041_astrometric_residuals.png (4816 matched stars from wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248_astrometric_residuals.png (4784 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249_astrometric_residuals.png (4783 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:18:19.86 +22:39:02.9: 15.10 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:18:19.86 +22:39:02.9: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:18:19.86 +22:39:02.9: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=9.0065 delta=6.10 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34188.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34168_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 34168_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34188_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 34188_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
06:18:19.86 +22:39:02.9
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
Image size: 944.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:40.331 +22:03:59.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:40.331 +22:03:59.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0583 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Image size: 944.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:43.090 +22:04:34.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:43.090 +22:04:34.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0690 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:27:40.331 +22:03:59.60
Second-epoch second image center 06:27:43.090 +22:04:34.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01439 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FYUmpycqDr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.i998jR0766
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OcIpDHakRQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FW6NKegPEh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 206292 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec +16.3091 to +27.3656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec 16.3091 to 27.3656 deg
Loaded 20018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11191 out of 16872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16872 out of 206292 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.736100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.736100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.27
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.27
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 206292 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec +16.3091 to +27.3656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec 16.3091 to 27.3656 deg
Loaded 20018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11191 out of 16872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16872 out of 206292 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 188638 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 88.2221 to 105.7490 deg, Dec +16.4980 to +27.2397 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 88.2221 to 105.7490 deg, Dec 16.4980 to 27.2397 deg
Loaded 19379 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11515 out of 16583 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16583 out of 188638 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (aperture=5.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 120 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.4 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
2.8 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
2.8 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
15.2 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.FYUmpycqDr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=47, blended=31903, bad_region=2, passed=206245
Got 206245 stars (including 174023 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 206245 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4833 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4792 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4791 stars left (next iteration limit 5270)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4791 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=1106 n_q2=1277 n_q3=1178 n_q4=1230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.183
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.i998jR0766 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=44, blended=29566, bad_region=0, passed=188594
Got 188594 stars (including 158851 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 188594 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4841 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4797 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 188594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4840 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 188594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 188594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4797 stars left (next iteration limit 5275)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits N_match=4797 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.647 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.569 n_q1=1146 n_q2=1371 n_q3=1051 n_q4=1229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.OcIpDHakRQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=4121, bad_region=2, passed=68334
Got 68334 stars (including 64113 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 68334 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013118 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010494 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68330 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68330 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68330 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 4782 stars left (next iteration limit 5259)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4782 robust_rms=6.170 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.073 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4782 robust_rms=0.487 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.963 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4782 robust_rms=0.398 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.541 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4782 robust_rms_before=1.281 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.443 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.398 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.515 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.541
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.515 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits N_match=4782 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.441 n_q1=1446 n_q2=701 n_q3=1673 n_q4=962 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.217
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.FW6NKegPEh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=4184, bad_region=1, passed=68348
Got 68348 stars (including 64073 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 68348 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013117 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010493 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4779 stars left (next iteration limit 5255)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=6.135 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.450 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=0.461 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.522 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=0.408 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.504 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4779 robust_rms_before=1.231 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.451 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.461 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.509 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.522
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.509 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits N_match=4779 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.463 n_q1=1484 n_q2=684 n_q3=1672 n_q4=939 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-20-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_042235_TTUQ1b1x1_3623052_EVZPprgJ/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:32:36.50 +20:08:51.9: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:54:32.35 +17:53:44.8: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:37:54.62 +20:35:05.2: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:07:56.53 +24:09:00.0: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:13:47.42 +24:28:02.7: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:55:35.47 +20:26:54.8: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:32:03.64 +25:57:10.0: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:07:56.53 +24:09:00.0: 13.10 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:55:35.47 +20:26:54.8: 12.93 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:32:03.64 +25:57:10.0: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:54:32.35 +17:53:44.8: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:37:54.62 +20:35:05.2: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:13:47.42 +24:28:02.7: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:32:36.50 +20:08:51.9: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:56.53 +24:09:00.0: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2434 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:55:35.47 +20:26:54.8: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1191 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.86 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:32.35 +17:53:44.8: ref_mag=11.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1184 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:03.64 +25:57:10.0: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0479 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:37:54.62 +20:35:05.2: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8802 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:36.50 +20:08:51.9: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7712 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:13:47.42 +24:28:02.7: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0631 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:59:45.41 +23:46:06.0: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:59:45.41 +23:46:06.0: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:45.41 +23:46:06.0: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0243 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:55.61 +20:16:16.6: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:41:56.68 +22:39:48.2: 14.92 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:03:34.14 +24:32:44.0: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:28:55.61 +20:16:16.6: 11.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:55.61 +20:16:16.6: ref_mag=11.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3637 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:41:56.68 +22:39:48.2: 14.36 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:41:56.68 +22:39:48.2: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=11.1130 delta=3.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:03:34.14 +24:32:44.0: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:57:07.16 +19:23:02.8: 13.12 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:57:07.16 +19:23:02.8: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:57:07.16 +19:23:02.8: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9303 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:05:52.73 +26:32:31.0: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:19:15.80 +26:58:10.8: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:24:44.97 +25:04:17.7: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:05:52.73 +26:32:31.0: 13.40 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:05:52.73 +26:32:31.0: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2145 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:19:15.80 +26:58:10.8: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:19:15.80 +26:58:10.8: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9860 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:05:11.81 +23:15:10.4: 15.16 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:24:44.97 +25:04:17.7: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:57:43.69 +24:45:44.7: 13.38 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:24:44.97 +25:04:17.7: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8563 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:26:13.01 +22:43:37.2: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:05:11.81 +23:15:10.4: 14.87 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:05:11.81 +23:15:10.4: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.2195 delta=1.77 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:57:43.69 +24:45:44.7: 13.48 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:57:43.69 +24:45:44.7: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3289 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:26:13.01 +22:43:37.2: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:26:13.01 +22:43:37.2: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9075 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:22:18.07 +25:35:55.2: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:20:55.65 +23:58:52.6: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:22:18.07 +25:35:55.2: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:22:18.07 +25:35:55.2: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1823 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:16.45 +23:32:39.5: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:01:40.08 +22:01:30.0: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:20:55.65 +23:58:52.6: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:20:55.65 +23:58:52.6: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1353 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:08:16.45 +23:32:39.5: 13.53 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:16.45 +23:32:39.5: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3454 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:32:21.90 +18:48:06.9: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:01:40.08 +22:01:30.0: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:18:33.84 +17:18:29.6: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:32:21.90 +18:48:06.9: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:18:33.84 +17:18:29.6: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:18:33.84 +17:18:29.6: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1685 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:45:54.63 +24:18:25.7: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:45:54.63 +24:18:25.7: 15.73 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.73 +/- 0.32
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:45:54.63 +24:18:25.7: ref_mag=15.73 +/- 0.32 new_mean_mag=11.9769 delta=3.75 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:15:50.68 +18:34:45.1: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:15:50.68 +18:34:45.1: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:15:50.68 +18:34:45.1: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5727 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:22:24.69 +19:47:54.4: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:22:24.69 +19:47:54.4: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:22:24.69 +19:47:54.4: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5397 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out147335.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out231135.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out231281.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out232194.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out232730.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out232748.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36524.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out59538.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230762_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 230762_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:20.78 +24:09:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230765_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 230765_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230766_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 230766_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:46.89 +21:47:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230772_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 230772_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:16.27 +17:38:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230776_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 230776_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230777_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 230777_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230779_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 230779_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230785_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 230785_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230793_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 230793_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230794_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 230794_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230795_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 230795_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:26.98 +23:49:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230796_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 230796_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:18.77 +21:54:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230797_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 230797_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:43.96 +23:55:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230799_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 230799_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:00.43 +20:16:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230809_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 230809_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230811_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 230811_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:07.47 +23:24:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230814_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 230814_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:03.05 +25:11:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230815_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 230815_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:22.60 +25:14:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230816_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 230816_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:58.93 +25:05:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230819_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 230819_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:52.67 +22:42:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230822_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 230822_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:29.76 +24:04:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230824_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 230824_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:45.12 +24:10:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230829_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 230829_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:05.48 +26:33:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230830_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 230830_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:22.45 +25:34:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230832_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 230832_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:10.59 +23:20:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230834_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 230834_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230854_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 230854_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:19.86 +22:39:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231010_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 231010_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:39.84 +22:30:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231013_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 231013_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:36.55 +22:29:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231086_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 231086_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:51.66 +24:02:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231104_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 231104_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:11.16 +22:21:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231135_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 231135_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231236_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 231236_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231248_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 231248_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.85 +25:55:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231256_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 231256_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:02.95 +23:18:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231281_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 231281_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231285_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 231285_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:01.47 +20:10:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231325_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 231325_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:04.28 +22:32:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231327_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 231327_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:14.34 +23:18:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231465_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 231465_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:37.54 +21:37:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231546_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 231546_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:39.26 +25:00:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231602_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 231602_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:33.15 +22:53:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231627_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 231627_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:18.80 +17:37:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231645_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 231645_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:38.99 +24:26:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231705_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 231705_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:49.76 +22:33:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231710_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 231710_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:01.21 +21:52:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231783_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 231783_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:51.88 +25:58:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231801_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 231801_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:58.52 +23:15:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231805_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 231805_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:27.64 +24:26:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231816_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 231816_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:45.64 +22:41:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231852_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 231852_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:20.26 +24:04:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231862_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 231862_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:11.71 +23:13:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231882_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 231882_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:31.39 +25:20:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231925_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 231925_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:51.99 +18:15:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231941_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 231941_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231954_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 231954_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:49.32 +19:19:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231975_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 231975_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:07.15 +22:04:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232007_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232007_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:40.02 +25:01:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232016_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232016_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232030_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232030_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:01.66 +23:19:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232059_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232059_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:28.90 +23:10:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232069_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232069_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:28.63 +24:23:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232089_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232089_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:55.78 +26:22:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232114_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232114_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232118_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232118_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232122_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232122_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:37.47 +24:36:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232124_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232124_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:00.29 +27:03:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232141_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232141_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232146_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232146_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232167_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232167_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:04.68 +24:51:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232183_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232183_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:47.45 +25:09:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232185_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232185_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:33.48 +18:11:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232188_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232188_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:18.49 +22:44:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232190_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232190_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:09.95 +25:47:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232194_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 232194_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232201_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232201_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232226_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232226_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:59.86 +25:58:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232245_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232245_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:42.33 +20:26:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232248_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232248_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232258_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232258_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:59.24 +23:51:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232266_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232266_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:06.32 +27:11:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232277_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232277_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:01.65 +27:09:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232340_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232340_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:45.80 +21:10:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232353_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232353_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:45.90 +22:43:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232375_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232375_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:21.47 +23:37:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232415_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232415_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:20.98 +18:34:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232417_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232417_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232424_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232424_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:18.56 +24:19:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232458_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232458_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:38.67 +23:06:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232481_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232481_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:12.43 +23:50:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232514_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232514_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232521_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232521_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:53.96 +23:37:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232537_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232537_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232607_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232607_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:21.48 +20:55:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232619_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232619_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:54.18 +23:17:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232662_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 232662_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:30.89 +21:14:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232730_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 232730_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232748_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 232748_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105975_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 105975_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:22.95 +22:04:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12343_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 12343_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43809_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 43809_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:58.52 +19:09:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25445_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 25445_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:39.43 +18:05:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153572_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 153572_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:09.80 +24:26:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217612_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 217612_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:29.70 +26:03:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86188_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 86188_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:30.20 +21:08:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29565_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 29565_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:43.77 +18:15:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89941_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 89941_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:26.52 +21:22:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59661_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 59661_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:58.35 +19:53:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110234_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 110234_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:11.20 +21:51:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101327_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 101327_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:10.81 +21:50:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26518_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 26518_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:39.07 +18:11:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13793_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 13793_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:16.07 +17:21:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17658_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 17658_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:18.11 +17:38:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97583_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 97583_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:33.53 +21:37:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147335_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 147335_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47494_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 47494_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:39.29 +19:11:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194267_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 194267_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:07.58 +25:02:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121256_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 121256_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-21-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
