This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 24.4690 2461276.9690 8.31 07:03:43.15 -11:33:06.5
224.60653 -2.55676 galactic CMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" Z CMa
Type: EXOR+FUOR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.200 V 10.600 V B8peq+F/G
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:03:43.15 -11:33:06.5: 9.52 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:03:43.15 -11:33:06.5: 9.53 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.53 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Z CMa,2461276.9690,8.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Z CMa 20260824.4690 8.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 24.4690 2461276.9690 10.22 07:04:25.58 -09:57:59.1
223.27524 -1.67713 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" BQ Mon
Type: LB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.650 V Y 0.880 V 2452188.90000 174.000000000000 M6-M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:04:25.58 -09:57:59.1: 11.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:04:25.58 -09:57:59.1: 11.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.24 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
BQ Mon,2461276.9690,10.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
BQ Mon 20260824.4690 10.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 24.4690 2461276.9690 12.48 07:07:36.52 -13:39:27.9
226.91567 -2.67657 galactic CMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.6" and 6.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" GDS_J0707367-133928
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.490 r Y 6.580 r 2458485.35060 377.300000000000 M10:
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:07:36.52 -13:39:27.9: 15.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:07:36.52 -13:39:27.9: 15.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
GDS_J0707367-133928,2461276.9690,12.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
GDS_J0707367-133928 20260824.4690 12.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 24.4690 2461276.9690 12.15 07:06:29.34 -06:25:33.2
220.36366 0.40143 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 7.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" GDS_J0706293-062531
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.960 r Y 0.700 r 2458490.50300 162.808022000000 M5
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:06:29.34 -06:25:33.2: 13.17 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:06:29.34 -06:25:33.2: 13.22 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
GDS_J0706293-062531,2461276.9690,12.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
GDS_J0706293-062531 20260824.4690 12.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461139.59921253 09.04.2026 02:22:41.963 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
First image: 2461139.59921253 09.04.2026 02:22:41.963 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Last image: 2461276.96920348 24.08.2026 11:15:29.181 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.00
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 19910
Objects passed selection criteria: 19772
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12584.2
Average stars matched: 11899.8 (94.5607 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 247336 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 20 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-192-g23359006
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-20)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 24 06:19:10 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461139.59921253 09.04.2026 02:22:41.963 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
First image: 2461139.59921253 09.04.2026 02:22:41.963 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Last image: 2461276.96920348 24.08.2026 11:15:29.181 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 81
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 28 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 142806
Objects passed selection criteria: 142379
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 97317
Average stars matched: 91291.2 (93.8081 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 605492 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 20 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-192-g23359006
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-20)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 24 06:20:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461276.96870856
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:31.944 -09:59:40.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits
Image size: 940.1'x624.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:24.955 -09:59:34.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:31.944 -09:59:40.78
Second-epoch image center 06:51:24.955 -09:59:34.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0287 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
Image size: 940.0'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:22.356 -09:59:46.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:31.944 -09:59:40.78
Second-epoch image center 06:51:22.356 -09:59:46.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0394 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:51:24.955 -09:59:34.26
Second-epoch second image center 06:51:22.356 -09:59:46.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01119 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xec1wDArYe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eP68BmTZkS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zaDN8QvmOg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits &> /tmp/tmp.p6LuU9PmXe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits and wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits and wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits and wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits) and catalog (wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 23708 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 94.8919 to 111.0361 deg, Dec -15.2871 to -4.5750 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 94.8919 to 111.0361 deg, Dec -15.2871 to -4.5750 deg
Loaded 21843 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14945 out of 16014 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16014 out of 23708 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.662200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.662200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.00
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.66
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.66
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 23708 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 94.8919 to 111.0361 deg, Dec -15.2871 to -4.5750 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 94.8919 to 111.0361 deg, Dec -15.2871 to -4.5750 deg
Loaded 21843 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14945 out of 16014 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16014 out of 23708 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 23764 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 94.8842 to 111.0361 deg, Dec -15.2871 to -4.5672 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 94.8842 to 111.0361 deg, Dec -15.2871 to -4.5672 deg
Loaded 21874 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14942 out of 16020 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16020 out of 23764 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
2.5 pix Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
2.3 pix fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits
2.3 pix fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
14.7 mag. Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.2 (SNR ) 10.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.xec1wDArYe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2215, bad_region=3520, passed=23708
Got 23708 stars (including 18215 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23708 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20988 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20988 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20988 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4920 stars left (next iteration limit 5412)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits N_match=4920 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.518 n_q1=1864 n_q2=824 n_q3=1516 n_q4=716 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.024
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits -region wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eP68BmTZkS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2234, bad_region=3533, passed=23764
Got 23764 stars (including 18241 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23764 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21034 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21034 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21034 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 4916 stars left (next iteration limit 5408)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits N_match=4916 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.547 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.518 n_q1=1869 n_q2=820 n_q3=1506 n_q4=721 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.056
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits -region wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zaDN8QvmOg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=421, bad_region=1341, passed=6491
Got 6491 stars (including 4784 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6491 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013057 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010446 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4707 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4668 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4669 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4668 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5467 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4706 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4670 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5467 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4670 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5467 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 4670 stars left (next iteration limit 5134)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4670 robust_rms=6.552 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.066 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4670 robust_rms=0.688 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.765 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4670 robust_rms=0.606 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.661 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4670 robust_rms_before=1.386 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.563 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.606 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.600 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.661
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.600 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits N_match=4670 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.572 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.577 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.561 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.607 n_q1=1316 n_q2=817 n_q3=1410 n_q4=1127 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.062
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.p6LuU9PmXe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=422, bad_region=1314, passed=6377
Got 6377 stars (including 4699 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6377 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013056 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010444 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4620 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4584 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4584 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5372 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4620 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4587 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5372 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4587 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5372 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4587 stars left (next iteration limit 5042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4587 robust_rms=6.525 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=7.884 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4587 robust_rms=0.686 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.765 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4587 robust_rms=0.604 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.655 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4587 robust_rms_before=1.290 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.559 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.604 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.601 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.655
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.601 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits N_match=4587 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.559 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.556 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.608 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.549 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.605 n_q1=1306 n_q2=792 n_q3=1385 n_q4=1104 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.088
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits sigma_overall=0.508 worst_q_ratio=1.024
ref2=Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits sigma_overall=0.518 worst_q_ratio=1.056
new1=fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits sigma_overall=0.572 worst_q_ratio=1.062
new2=fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits sigma_overall=0.559 worst_q_ratio=1.088
reference average sigma_overall=0.513 worst_q_ratio=1.04
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023_astrometric_residuals.png (4920 matched stars from wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024_astrometric_residuals.png (4916 matched stars from wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494_astrometric_residuals.png (4670 matched stars from wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.52 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495_astrometric_residuals.png (4587 matched stars from wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Mon-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:04:25.58 -09:57:59.1: 11.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:03:43.15 -11:33:06.5: 9.52 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:03:43.15 -11:33:06.5: 9.53 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:04:25.58 -09:57:59.1: 11.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.53 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:03:43.15 -11:33:06.5: ref_mag=9.53 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=8.3174 delta=1.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:04:25.58 -09:57:59.1: ref_mag=11.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.2239 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out13267.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out16235.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32514_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 32514_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:22.67 -12:39:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32579_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 32579_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:29.70 -08:57:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16235_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
Preparing report for the candidate 16235_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13267_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
Preparing report for the candidate 13267_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Mon-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
07:04:25.58 -09:57:59.1
07:03:43.15 -11:33:06.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:31.944 -09:59:40.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits
Image size: 940.1'x624.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:24.955 -09:59:34.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:31.944 -09:59:40.78
Second-epoch image center 06:51:24.955 -09:59:34.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0287 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
Image size: 940.0'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:22.356 -09:59:46.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:31.944 -09:59:40.78
Second-epoch image center 06:51:22.356 -09:59:46.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0394 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:51:24.955 -09:59:34.26
Second-epoch second image center 06:51:22.356 -09:59:46.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01119 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LOkBrUoM3J
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hwZZAewlCn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits &> /tmp/tmp.38P3EFoU82
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits &> /tmp/tmp.X0Du0BeY0G
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits and wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits and wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits and wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits) and catalog (wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 163412 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 94.8860 to 111.0563 deg, Dec -15.2906 to -4.5674 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 94.8860 to 111.0563 deg, Dec -15.2906 to -4.5674 deg
Loaded 21923 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14198 out of 18773 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18773 out of 163412 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.494450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.494450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.77
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.77
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 163412 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 94.8860 to 111.0563 deg, Dec -15.2906 to -4.5674 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 94.8860 to 111.0563 deg, Dec -15.2906 to -4.5674 deg
Loaded 21923 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14198 out of 18773 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18773 out of 163412 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 164110 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 94.8842 to 111.0510 deg, Dec -15.2898 to -4.5672 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 94.8842 to 111.0510 deg, Dec -15.2898 to -4.5672 deg
Loaded 21912 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14201 out of 18779 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18779 out of 164110 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 56 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
2.3 pix Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
2.2 pix fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits
2.2 pix fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
14.8 mag. Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 12.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.LOkBrUoM3J (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=38, blended=21454, bad_region=16234, passed=163374
Got 163374 stars (including 127676 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 163374 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151624 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151624 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151623 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4929 stars left (next iteration limit 5421)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits N_match=4929 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.510 n_q1=1782 n_q2=860 n_q3=1471 n_q4=816 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.049
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits -region wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hwZZAewlCn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=49, blended=21473, bad_region=16292, passed=164061
Got 164061 stars (including 128281 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 164061 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 152209 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 152209 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 152209 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 4923 stars left (next iteration limit 5415)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits N_match=4923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.537 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.533 n_q1=1776 n_q2=868 n_q3=1488 n_q4=791 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.040
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits -region wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.38P3EFoU82 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=2621, bad_region=8875, passed=58097
Got 58097 stars (including 46919 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58097 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013057 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010446 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51669 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51669 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51669 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 4885 stars left (next iteration limit 5373)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=6.324 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.195 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=0.679 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.709 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=0.601 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.637 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4885 robust_rms_before=1.378 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.550 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.601 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.587 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.637
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.587 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits N_match=4885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.534 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.549 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.587 n_q1=1400 n_q2=792 n_q3=1490 n_q4=1203 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.099
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.X0Du0BeY0G (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=2581, bad_region=8669, passed=56656
Got 56656 stars (including 45717 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013056 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010444 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50394 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50394 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50394 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 4888 stars left (next iteration limit 5376)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=6.243 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.146 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=0.681 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.724 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=0.601 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.647 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4888 robust_rms_before=1.280 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.548 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.601 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.582 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.647
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.582 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits N_match=4888 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.531 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.532 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.580 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.532 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.576 n_q1=1397 n_q2=800 n_q3=1485 n_q4=1206 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.091
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-14-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0494.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_061606_TTUQ2b1x1_4010724_UyXtt4g7/wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Mon-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:46:08.95 -13:40:41.1: 13.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:50:34.57 -06:39:17.5: 12.70 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:35:42.46 -07:39:15.1: 12.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:06:56.85 -10:37:46.7: 12.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:43:01.46 -06:34:34.2: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:50:34.57 -06:39:17.5: 12.76 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:35:42.46 -07:39:15.1: 12.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:06:56.85 -10:37:46.7: 12.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:46:08.95 -13:40:41.1: 13.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:50:34.57 -06:39:17.5: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0121 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:35:42.46 -07:39:15.1: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7887 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:56.85 -10:37:46.7: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5902 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:46:08.95 -13:40:41.1: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0581 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:43:01.46 -06:34:34.2: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:01.46 -06:34:34.2: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6937 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:39:50.00 -05:52:14.2: 10.66 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:46:00.26 -07:21:07.8: 12.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:39:50.00 -05:52:14.2: 10.69 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.68 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:39:50.00 -05:52:14.2: ref_mag=10.68 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0724 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:00:21.20 -05:50:35.4: 12.82 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:46:00.26 -07:21:07.8: 12.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:46:00.26 -07:21:07.8: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6210 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:03:17.28 -08:30:07.2: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:07:36.52 -13:39:27.9: 15.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:00:21.20 -05:50:35.4: 12.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:00:21.20 -05:50:35.4: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5917 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:07:36.52 -13:39:27.9: 15.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:03:17.28 -08:30:07.2: 12.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:03:17.28 -08:30:07.2: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6749 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:06:29.34 -06:25:33.2: 13.17 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:06:29.34 -06:25:33.2: 13.22 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:06:29.34 -06:25:33.2: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.1545 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out194505.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31528.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 82s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186512_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 186512_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186518_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 186518_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186522_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 186522_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:22.88 -07:12:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186532_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 186532_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:16.02 -07:15:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186534_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 186534_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186535_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 186535_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:57.61 -06:24:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186543_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 186543_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:16.65 -07:02:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186546_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 186546_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186547_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 186547_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:44.19 -09:45:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186550_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 186550_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:34.38 -08:08:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186551_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 186551_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:59.71 -06:02:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186552_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 186552_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:10.47 -06:04:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186560_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 186560_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:47.99 -09:11:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186569_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 186569_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:51.04 -07:20:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186570_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 186570_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186584_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 186584_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:46.99 -05:48:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186589_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 186589_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:00.12 -09:20:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186591_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 186591_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:09.29 -07:40:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186592_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 186592_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:08.71 -06:48:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186593_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 186593_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:44.14 -07:06:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186594_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 186594_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:13.95 -08:02:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186598_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 186598_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:26.09 -06:06:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186600_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 186600_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:53.53 -06:35:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186603_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 186603_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187812_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 187812_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:22.67 -12:39:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190599_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 190599_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:49.14 -08:18:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190874_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 190874_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.55 -10:39:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191301_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 191301_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:11.24 -06:02:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191669_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 191669_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:42.73 -09:23:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192070_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 192070_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:19.16 -09:04:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192292_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 192292_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:11.39 -06:44:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192376_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 192376_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192631_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 192631_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:41.50 -07:11:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192691_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 192691_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:35.02 -09:12:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192904_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 192904_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:00.23 -12:15:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193280_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 193280_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193350_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 193350_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:31.16 -07:10:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193369_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 193369_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:47.83 -13:12:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193618_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 193618_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:33.69 -10:45:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193818_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 193818_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:24.38 -13:49:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194018_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 194018_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:20.33 -09:05:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194144_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 194144_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:46.28 -09:32:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194328_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 194328_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:48.11 -09:30:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194398_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 194398_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194505_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
Preparing report for the candidate 194505_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195148_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 195148_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:41.76 -10:50:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195184_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 195184_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:15.80 -08:46:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195886_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 195886_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:42.37 -06:09:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196334_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 196334_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:47.66 -09:31:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31528_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
Preparing report for the candidate 31528_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74210_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 74210_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:29.59 -08:57:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83790_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 83790_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:15.53 -09:39:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92988_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 92988_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:09.76 -10:17:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133219_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 133219_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:41.00 -12:45:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89187_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 89187_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:25.56 -09:57:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112306_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495
The candidate 112306_fd_Mon-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_06-15-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0495 did not pass the final checks