This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 24.4150 2461276.9150 12.63 06:45:35.15 +32:19:35.1
183.03168 12.98126 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 10.5 pix
The object was found in VSX20" Gaia DR3 937285666421333120
Type: DSCT|GDOR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.500 G 14.540 G A
The object was found in astcheck.250 Bettina 1 0 1 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:45:35.15 +32:19:35.1: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:45:35.15 +32:19:35.1: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 937285666421333120,2461276.9150,12.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 937285666421333120 20260824.4150 12.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 24.4150 2461276.9150 11.86 06:58:02.26 +32:41:24.8
183.75947 15.53587 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 10.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.89 Julia 0 -0 0 11.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:58:02.26 +32:41:24.8: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:58:02.26 +32:41:24.8: 16.09 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.09 +/- 0.31
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461276.9150,11.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260824.4150 11.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461276.91625851 24.08.2026 09:59:14.735 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 18406
Objects passed selection criteria: 18341
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 14120.8
Average stars matched: 13796.2 (97.702 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 244720 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 20 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-192-g23359006
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-20)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 24 05:03:04 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461276.91625851 24.08.2026 09:59:14.735 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 116
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 33 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 131420
Objects passed selection criteria: 131130
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 105725
Average stars matched: 102280 (96.742 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 604776 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 20 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-192-g23359006
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-20)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 24 05:04:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461276.91383540
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
Image size: 939.3'x624.3' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:59:57.749 +30:00:22.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 06:59:57.749 +30:00:22.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0143 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
Image size: 938.9'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:01.764 +29:59:50.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 07:00:01.764 +29:59:50.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0055 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:59:57.749 +30:00:22.11
Second-epoch second image center 07:00:01.764 +29:59:50.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01689 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Kup2CwEjvV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.U2lw6Jod6v
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OSkG3qxccq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wDJUI7yAz2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec +24.1612 to +35.3654 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec 24.1612 to 35.3654 deg
Loaded 15250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10848 out of 11975 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11975 out of 24243 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.903450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.903450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec +24.1612 to +35.3654 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec 24.1612 to 35.3654 deg
Loaded 15250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10848 out of 11975 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11975 out of 24243 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2298 to 114.2895 deg, Dec +24.1920 to +35.3691 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2298 to 114.2895 deg, Dec 24.1920 to 35.3691 deg
Loaded 15195 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10824 out of 11955 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11955 out of 24037 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.Kup2CwEjvV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2293, bad_region=4438, passed=24243
Got 24243 stars (including 17882 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4829 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4768 stars left (next iteration limit 5245)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=4768 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=1752 n_q2=820 n_q3=1429 n_q4=767 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.195
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.U2lw6Jod6v (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2282, bad_region=4407, passed=24037
Got 24037 stars (including 17688 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20608 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20608 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20608 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4768 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=4768 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=1744 n_q2=821 n_q3=1437 n_q4=766 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.161
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OSkG3qxccq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=540, bad_region=1422, passed=9692
Got 9692 stars (including 7776 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9692 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013046 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010437 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8593 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8593 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8593 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4761 stars left (next iteration limit 5237)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4761 robust_rms=5.894 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.993 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4761 robust_rms=0.624 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.731 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4761 robust_rms=0.490 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.557 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4761 robust_rms_before=1.009 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.502 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.490 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.583 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.557
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.583 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits N_match=4761 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.556 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.402 n_q1=1863 n_q2=728 n_q3=1466 n_q4=704 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.089
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wDJUI7yAz2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=556, bad_region=1475, passed=10591
Got 10591 stars (including 8612 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10591 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013040 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010432 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9457 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4829 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4758 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9457 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4758 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9457 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4758 stars left (next iteration limit 5236)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4758 robust_rms=6.073 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.523 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4758 robust_rms=0.514 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.555 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4758 robust_rms=0.475 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.498 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4758 robust_rms_before=0.838 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.480 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.475 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.516 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.498
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.516 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits N_match=4758 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.435 n_q1=1868 n_q2=694 n_q3=1501 n_q4=695 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.070
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits sigma_overall=0.404 worst_q_ratio=1.195
ref2=Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits sigma_overall=0.394 worst_q_ratio=1.161
new1=fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits sigma_overall=0.510 worst_q_ratio=1.089
new2=fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits sigma_overall=0.487 worst_q_ratio=1.070
reference average sigma_overall=0.399 worst_q_ratio=1.178
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226_astrometric_residuals.png (4768 matched stars from wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227_astrometric_residuals.png (4768 matched stars from wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418_astrometric_residuals.png (4761 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419_astrometric_residuals.png (4758 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31199_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 31199_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:22.00 +29:19:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31200_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 31200_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:21.47 +26:10:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31201_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 31201_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:40.83 +27:59:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31258_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 31258_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.95 +31:35:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03075_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 03075_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:33.91 +25:59:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13804_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 13804_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:07.26 +30:16:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 0s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
Image size: 939.3'x624.3' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:59:57.749 +30:00:22.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 06:59:57.749 +30:00:22.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0143 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
Image size: 938.9'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:01.764 +29:59:50.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 07:00:01.764 +29:59:50.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0055 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:59:57.749 +30:00:22.11
Second-epoch second image center 07:00:01.764 +29:59:50.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01689 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pMRMXY83TC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6OlbHGaW5Q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gLZaoN7U1f
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sCofvh4RBq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec +24.1432 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec 24.1432 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15347 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8758 out of 12241 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12241 out of 167542 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.764400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.764400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec +24.1432 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec 24.1432 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15347 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8758 out of 12241 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12241 out of 167542 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 166985 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2096 to 114.3128 deg, Dec +24.1626 to +35.3760 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2096 to 114.3128 deg, Dec 24.1626 to 35.3760 deg
Loaded 15290 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8659 out of 12225 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12225 out of 166985 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 84 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.pMRMXY83TC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=38, blended=20873, bad_region=23130, passed=167504
Got 167504 stars (including 125190 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167504 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4808 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4773 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 149932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4809 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 149932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 149932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4772 stars left (next iteration limit 5250)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=4772 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1652 n_q2=856 n_q3=1476 n_q4=788 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.233
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6OlbHGaW5Q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=45, blended=20907, bad_region=23158, passed=166940
Got 166940 stars (including 124617 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 166940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4801 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 149289 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4801 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4764 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 149289 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 149289 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4763 stars left (next iteration limit 5238)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=4763 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.289 n_q1=1663 n_q2=845 n_q3=1465 n_q4=790 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.256
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gLZaoN7U1f (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=4610, bad_region=8289, passed=75542
Got 75542 stars (including 62870 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 75542 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013046 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010437 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4746 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4746 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69457 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4807 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4744 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69457 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4744 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69457 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4744 stars left (next iteration limit 5220)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4744 robust_rms=6.192 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.127 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4744 robust_rms=0.611 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.734 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4744 robust_rms=0.484 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.565 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4744 robust_rms_before=1.020 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.494 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.484 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.601 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.565
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.601 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits N_match=4744 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.592 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.385 n_q1=1874 n_q2=760 n_q3=1374 n_q4=736 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.211
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sCofvh4RBq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=4731, bad_region=7098, passed=77189
Got 77189 stars (including 65781 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 77189 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013040 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010432 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4816 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4755 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4755 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72119 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4815 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4753 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72119 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4753 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72119 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4753 stars left (next iteration limit 5230)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4753 robust_rms=5.988 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.524 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4753 robust_rms=0.516 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.570 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4753 robust_rms=0.478 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.506 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4753 robust_rms_before=0.847 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.481 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.478 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.529 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.506
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.529 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits N_match=4753 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.534 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.445 n_q1=1866 n_q2=681 n_q3=1487 n_q4=719 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.106
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-55-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_045949_TTUQ2b1x1_2764788_R08HYtKF/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:37:31.37 +31:03:05.3: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:52:30.28 +31:21:59.4: 13.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:41:29.53 +33:24:46.0: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:12:55.88 +28:08:03.1: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:37:31.37 +31:03:05.3: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:52:30.28 +31:21:59.4: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:41:29.53 +33:24:46.0: 13.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:37:31.37 +31:03:05.3: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4046 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:52:30.28 +31:21:59.4: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2233 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:29.53 +33:24:46.0: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4041 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:12:55.88 +28:08:03.1: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:12:55.88 +28:08:03.1: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1764 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:11:28.54 +31:28:01.4: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:30:53.86 +32:48:16.0: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:30:29.55 +27:25:18.3: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:30:53.86 +32:48:16.0: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:11:28.54 +31:28:01.4: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:53.86 +32:48:16.0: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0319 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:28.54 +31:28:01.4: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9702 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:30:29.55 +27:25:18.3: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:29.55 +27:25:18.3: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1452 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:17:27.02 +30:49:38.6: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:32:54.89 +28:21:21.0: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:32:54.89 +28:21:21.0: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:17:27.02 +30:49:38.6: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:43:12.76 +26:58:26.5: 13.83 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:54.89 +28:21:21.0: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4636 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:17:27.02 +30:49:38.6: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3515 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:52:08.61 +30:33:42.0: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:43:12.76 +26:58:26.5: 13.72 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:12.76 +26:58:26.5: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6207 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:52:08.61 +30:33:42.0: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:52:08.61 +30:33:42.0: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7028 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:39:32.31 +30:16:48.8: 13.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:00:03.60 +31:09:23.5: 14.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:39:32.31 +30:16:48.8: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:58:02.26 +32:41:24.8: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:39:32.31 +30:16:48.8: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8770 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:00:03.60 +31:09:23.5: 14.22 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:00:03.60 +31:09:23.5: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9325 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:45:35.15 +32:19:35.1: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:58:02.26 +32:41:24.8: 16.09 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.09 +/- 0.31
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:58:02.26 +32:41:24.8: ref_mag=16.09 +/- 0.31 new_mean_mag=11.8544 delta=4.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:45:35.15 +32:19:35.1: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out136023.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out138590.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 84s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190166_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190166_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:28.61 +29:45:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190185_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190185_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:19.03 +28:02:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190190_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190190_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:35.25 +27:51:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190201_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190201_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:32.50 +27:58:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190205_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190205_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:26.76 +27:25:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190211_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190211_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:09.98 +33:21:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190214_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190214_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190216_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190216_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190223_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190223_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:02.53 +29:16:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190227_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190227_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190229_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190229_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190236_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190236_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:30.52 +33:49:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190244_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190244_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:35.15 +28:52:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190251_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190251_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:23.52 +26:48:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190257_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190257_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:43.93 +29:29:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190258_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190258_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:04.45 +26:33:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190408_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190408_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:39.23 +27:38:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190410_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190410_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:34.13 +28:18:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190422_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190422_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:05.41 +27:59:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190450_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190450_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:00.51 +29:47:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190473_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190473_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:51.00 +32:48:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190476_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190476_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:16.97 +29:19:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190477_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190477_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:37.34 +26:03:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190478_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190478_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:15.63 +27:12:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190495_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190495_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:52.87 +33:40:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190496_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190496_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:25.46 +26:07:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190498_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190498_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:04.54 +27:12:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190512_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190512_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:47.04 +27:58:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190528_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190528_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:23.40 +26:08:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190535_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190535_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190538_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190538_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190545_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190545_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:25.21 +27:14:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190548_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190548_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190552_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190552_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:20.58 +26:22:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190564_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190564_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:51.42 +26:54:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190570_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190570_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:49.29 +32:38:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190588_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190588_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:49.71 +33:53:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190597_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190597_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:31.31 +30:38:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190608_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190608_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:55.34 +26:27:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190614_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190614_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:02.74 +29:43:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190615_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190615_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:52.46 +28:23:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190622_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190622_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:12.67 +30:33:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190626_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190626_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:59.25 +33:13:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190632_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190632_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:13.64 +28:32:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190636_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190636_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:22.83 +33:20:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190640_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190640_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:05.57 +30:55:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190644_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190644_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:40.72 +31:22:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190646_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190646_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:25.90 +31:14:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190656_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190656_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190657_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190657_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:13.56 +29:44:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190659_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190659_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190677_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190677_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:08.99 +27:46:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190681_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190681_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:46.64 +26:19:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190686_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190686_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:35.16 +31:07:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190689_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190689_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:03.62 +31:09:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190695_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190695_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:11.66 +26:58:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190700_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190700_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:20.98 +30:56:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190706_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190706_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:39.48 +28:12:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190710_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190710_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:46.81 +31:55:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190712_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190712_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190721_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190721_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:26.97 +33:15:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190722_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190722_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:03.15 +27:02:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190723_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190723_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:55.89 +27:08:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190724_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190724_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:08.99 +26:20:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190752_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190752_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190766_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190766_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:41.35 +25:42:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190784_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190784_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:53.37 +28:54:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190794_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190794_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:15.34 +27:44:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190803_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190803_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:30.73 +32:10:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190806_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190806_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:36.80 +30:31:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190815_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190815_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:28.09 +32:38:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190832_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190832_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:58.07 +28:28:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190833_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190833_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:53.55 +26:47:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190897_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190897_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190934_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190934_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:00.06 +28:25:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190939_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190939_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:03.02 +27:40:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190964_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 190964_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146225_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 146225_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.98 +31:35:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32881_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 32881_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:12.36 +26:47:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138590_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
Preparing report for the candidate 138590_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136023_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
Preparing report for the candidate 136023_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48598_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 48598_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:20.63 +27:15:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20138_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 20138_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:33.90 +25:59:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419
The candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-24_04-59-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks