Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 24.2748  2461276.7748  11.44  23:50:23.69 -16:58:42.8
 65.50733 -72.61828 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 4.2 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
23 Thalia                  -0     -0       0  11.7     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:50:23.69 -16:58:42.8:  14.83 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:50:23.69 -16:58:42.8:  14.88 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits


fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits


fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits -crosshair 3373.32788 3709.06177 image    wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits -crosshair 3377.10059 3710.83252 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 24.27481 23 50 23.69 -16 58 42.8          11.4 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 24.27455 23 50 23.69 -16 58 42.8          11.4 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 08 24.27507 23 50 23.69 -16 58 42.8          11.5 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 08 24.2748*  23 50 23.69 -16 58 42.8  11.4 U             Aqr       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461276.7748,11.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260824.2748 11.44CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 24.2748  2461276.7748  12.41  23:56:53.19 -17:03:28.6
 68.73086 -73.86405 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 4.1 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
259 Aletheia                -0      0       0  12.5     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:56:53.19 -17:03:28.6:  14.89 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:56:53.19 -17:03:28.6:  14.91 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits


fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits


fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits -crosshair 4309.30859 3724.80640 image    wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits -crosshair 4313.00244 3726.52466 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 24.27481 23 56 53.19 -17 03 28.6          12.4 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 24.27455 23 56 53.20 -17 03 28.4          12.4 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 08 24.27507 23 56 53.17 -17 03 28.8          12.4 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 08 24.2748*  23 56 53.19 -17 03 28.6  12.4 U             Cet       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461276.7748,12.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260824.2748 12.41CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-09-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Field Cet-09-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Field Cet-09-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Field Cet-09-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461233.94143410 12.07.2026 10:35:29.906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
First image: 2461233.94143410 12.07.2026 10:35:29.906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Last  image: 2461276.77507279 24.08.2026 06:35:56.289   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -8.31
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  2575
Objects passed selection criteria:  2574
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.7    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.7    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 2439.25
Average stars matched: 2363 (96.874 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   229816 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Thu Aug 20 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-192-g23359006
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-20)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Mon Aug 24 03:40:49 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461233.94143410 12.07.2026 10:35:29.906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
First image: 2461233.94143410 12.07.2026 10:35:29.906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Last  image: 2461276.77507279 24.08.2026 06:35:56.289   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 103
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -8.05
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  15400
Objects passed selection criteria:  15366
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.7    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.7    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 14684
Average stars matched: 14041.2 (95.6228 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   241076 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Thu Aug 20 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-192-g23359006
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-20)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Mon Aug 24 03:41:40 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-09-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-09-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-09-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 301238 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 301238 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits_preview.png'

Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits


renamed 'Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits_preview.png'

Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2300.5383
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 471.8181
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3695.5488
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 888.5339
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3685.1650
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 885.4417
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.60638
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.003
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     30.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 29.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-24T01:35:10.9941936' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-24T06:35:10.9941936' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61276.2744328007 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-24T06:35:20.8979248' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =      61276.274547419 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     359.996648109771 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -17.9998742032518 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     30.6055555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     145.434444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.95878971439424 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-09'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29553 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29553 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     30.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     30.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                  9.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 30.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               900.81 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 29.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 47.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            20.201616 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =            12.601008 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/d_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits :)

Spent 0.655017 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/d_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     30.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 29.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-24T01:35:56.2899797' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-24T06:35:56.2899797' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61276.2749570487 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-24T06:36:06.1905961' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61276.2750716433 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     359.996648057584 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -17.9998742103575 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     30.6961111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     145.619444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =      1.9536114552337 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-09'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29553 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29553 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     30.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     30.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                  9.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 30.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               900.81 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 29.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 47.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            20.201616 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =            12.601008 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/d_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits :)

Spent 0.627454 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/d_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits



fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461276.77454854
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.8'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.799 -17:59:09.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42
Second-epoch image center 23:59:59.799 -17:59:09.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0158 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.8'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:58.198 -17:59:18.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42
Second-epoch image center 23:59:58.198 -17:59:18.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0150 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  23:59:59.799 -17:59:09.53
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:58.198 -17:59:18.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00683 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sjAikLwCqY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wEXlkASPv1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wbm5U1fljp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oEC1dgsXZE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg
Loaded 4133 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1989 out of 2020 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2020 out of 2460 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.382900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.382900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -8.31
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.07

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.07

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg
Loaded 4133 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1989 out of 2020 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2020 out of 2460 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (aperture=6.2)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 2454 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5961 to 8.4401 deg, Dec -23.2424 to -12.6281 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5961 to 8.4401 deg, Dec -23.2424 to -12.6281 deg
Loaded 4123 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1992 out of 2014 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2014 out of 2454 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.2 pix  Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
 2.2 pix  Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 14.1 mag.  Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
 14.1 mag.  Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
 14.0 mag.  fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
 14.0 mag.  fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.0 (SNR )  11.1 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.sjAikLwCqY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=208, bad_region=0, passed=2460
Got 2460 stars (including 2249 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5854 through 0 to 8.4425, gap 8.4425 to 351.5854
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2173 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2170 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2170 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2460 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5853 through 0 to 8.4415, gap 8.4415 to 351.5853
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2173 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2170 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2460 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2170 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2460 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 2170 stars left (next iteration limit 2387)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits N_match=2170 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.423 n_q1=568 n_q2=534 n_q3=534 n_q4=534 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.194
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wEXlkASPv1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=201, bad_region=0, passed=2454
Got 2454 stars (including 2246 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2454 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5961 through 0 to 8.4401, gap 8.4401 to 351.5961
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2168 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2164 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2164 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2454 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5952 through 0 to 8.4410, gap 8.4410 to 351.5952
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2170 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2166 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2454 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2166 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2454 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Excluding outliers - 2166 stars left (next iteration limit 2380)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits N_match=2166 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=569 n_q2=535 n_q3=549 n_q4=513 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.237
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wbm5U1fljp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=198, bad_region=0, passed=2456
Got 2456 stars (including 2256 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2456 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.2430 through 0 to 8.3408, gap 8.3408 to 351.2430
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2179 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2175 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2175 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2175 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2456 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.2425 through 0 to 8.3415, gap 8.3415 to 351.2425
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2179 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2175 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2456 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2175 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2456 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 
Excluding outliers - 2175 stars left (next iteration limit 2392)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2175 robust_rms=11.864 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.340 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2175 robust_rms=0.373 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.385 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2175 robust_rms=0.263 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.285 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2175 robust_rms_before=1.084 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.256 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.263 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.293 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.285
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.293 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits N_match=2175 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.256 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.251 n_q1=599 n_q2=518 n_q3=569 n_q4=489 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.102
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oEC1dgsXZE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=198, bad_region=0, passed=2455
Got 2455 stars (including 2249 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2455 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.2430 through 0 to 8.3078, gap 8.3078 to 351.2430
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2178 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2172 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2172 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2172 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2455 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.2425 through 0 to 8.3085, gap 8.3085 to 351.2425
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2178 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2172 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2455 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2172 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2455 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 
Excluding outliers - 2172 stars left (next iteration limit 2389)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2172 robust_rms=11.797 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.405 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2172 robust_rms=0.370 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.393 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2172 robust_rms=0.252 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.275 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2172 robust_rms_before=1.088 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.238 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.252 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.246 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.275
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.246 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits N_match=2172 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.241 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.241 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.242 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.227 n_q1=603 n_q2=506 n_q3=572 n_q4=491 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.068
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.194
ref2=Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits sigma_overall=0.370 worst_q_ratio=1.237
new1=fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits sigma_overall=0.257 worst_q_ratio=1.102
new2=fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits sigma_overall=0.241 worst_q_ratio=1.068
reference average sigma_overall=0.3715 worst_q_ratio=1.2155
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472_astrometric_residuals.png (2170 matched stars from wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473_astrometric_residuals.png (2166 matched stars from wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262_astrometric_residuals.png (2175 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263_astrometric_residuals.png (2172 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.22 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20177_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 20177_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    11.09    00:02:07.30 -14:40:33.0   4984 5206   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

**** FOUND  00:02:07.33 -14:40:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01803_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 01803_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    8.12    23:43:49.65 -15:17:05.8   2347 4659   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

**** FOUND  23:43:49.64 -15:17:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.8'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.799 -17:59:09.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42
Second-epoch image center 23:59:59.799 -17:59:09.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0158 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.8'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:58.198 -17:59:18.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42
Second-epoch image center 23:59:58.198 -17:59:18.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0150 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  23:59:59.799 -17:59:09.53
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:58.198 -17:59:18.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00683 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits &> /tmp/tmp.j4lzqP08pd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GIxGh8fRul
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ywnZnQPkoL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rpS9vf75Sn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 14972 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg
Loaded 4152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3457 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3457 out of 14972 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.255300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.255300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -8.05
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.21

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.21

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 14972 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg
Loaded 4152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3457 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3457 out of 14972 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (aperture=4.9)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 15163 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5857 to 8.4400 deg, Dec -23.2549 to -12.6016 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5857 to 8.4400 deg, Dec -23.2549 to -12.6016 deg
Loaded 4148 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3365 out of 3470 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3470 out of 15163 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 93 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
 2.1 pix  Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 14.2 mag.  Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
 14.2 mag.  Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
 14.1 mag.  fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
 14.1 mag.  fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.1 (SNR )  13.5 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.j4lzqP08pd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=477, bad_region=0, passed=14962
Got 14962 stars (including 14469 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14962 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5847 through 0 to 8.4424, gap 8.4424 to 351.5847
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5844 through 0 to 8.4413, gap 8.4413 to 351.5844
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Excluding outliers - 4858 stars left (next iteration limit 5342)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits N_match=4858 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.443 n_q1=1269 n_q2=1103 n_q3=1307 n_q4=1179 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GIxGh8fRul (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=621, bad_region=0, passed=15161
Got 15161 stars (including 14519 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15161 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5857 through 0 to 8.4400, gap 8.4400 to 351.5857
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4856 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5846 through 0 to 8.4408, gap 8.4408 to 351.5846
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Excluding outliers - 4857 stars left (next iteration limit 5341)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits N_match=4857 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.411 n_q1=1273 n_q2=1108 n_q3=1310 n_q4=1166 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.198
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ywnZnQPkoL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=377, bad_region=0, passed=14528
Got 14528 stars (including 14128 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14528 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.2430 through 0 to 8.3455, gap 8.3455 to 351.2430
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14528 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.2423 through 0 to 8.3463, gap 8.3463 to 351.2423
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14528 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14528 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Excluding outliers - 4857 stars left (next iteration limit 5343)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4857 robust_rms=10.476 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.387 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4857 robust_rms=0.438 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.448 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4857 robust_rms=0.332 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.376 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4857 robust_rms_before=1.109 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.324 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.332 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.367 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.376
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.367 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits N_match=4857 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1263 n_q2=1120 n_q3=1347 n_q4=1127 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.169
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rpS9vf75Sn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=390, bad_region=1, passed=14491
Got 14491 stars (including 14071 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14491 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.2430 through 0 to 8.3380, gap 8.3380 to 351.2430
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14491 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.2424 through 0 to 8.3388, gap 8.3388 to 351.2424
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14491 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14491 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 4853 stars left (next iteration limit 5338)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4853 robust_rms=10.421 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.222 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4853 robust_rms=0.457 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.471 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4853 robust_rms=0.334 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.380 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4853 robust_rms_before=1.107 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.325 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.334 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.353 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.380
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.353 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits N_match=4853 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=1271 n_q2=1115 n_q3=1340 n_q4=1127 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.084
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:50:23.69 -16:58:42.8:  14.83 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:56:32.27 -14:45:01.5:  11.13 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:29:55.73 -22:44:41.7:  13.33 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:12:35.53 -17:15:10.1:  13.15 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:27:06.52 -20:39:57.7:  13.55 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:58.65 -13:18:34.1:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:28:30.65 -20:08:37.2:  12.93 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:29:55.73 -22:44:41.7:  12.95 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:58.65 -13:18:34.1:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:58.65 -13:18:34.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:28:30.65 -20:08:37.2:  12.98 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:56:32.27 -14:45:01.5:  11.14 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.07 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:12:35.53 -17:15:10.1:  13.02 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:55.73 -22:44:41.7: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.0069 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.08 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:50:23.69 -16:58:42.8:  14.88 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:32.27 -14:45:01.5: ref_mag=11.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3923 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.96 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:30.65 -20:08:37.2: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.0465 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:12:35.53 -17:15:10.1: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3132 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:27:06.52 -20:39:57.7:  13.42 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.48 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:06.52 -20:39:57.7: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.3808 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:56:53.19 -17:03:28.6:  14.89 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:29.72 -22:33:33.3:  13.41 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:56:53.19 -17:03:28.6:  14.91 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:49.20 -22:36:19.5:  13.47 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:27:22.98 -21:44:57.3:  13.55 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:30:17.28 -20:37:59.6:  13.61 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:28:37.23 -22:39:16.6:  13.47 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:55.29 -21:26:31.8:  13.48 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:29.72 -22:33:33.3:  13.41 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.41 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:29.72 -22:33:33.3: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.8675 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:44.55 -21:52:08.7:  13.61 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:28:46.09 -21:01:36.9:  13.58 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:49.20 -22:36:19.5:  13.35 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.40 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:49.20 -22:36:19.5: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.0010 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:27:22.98 -21:44:57.3:  13.33 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.42 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:22.98 -21:44:57.3: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.2129 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:30:17.28 -20:37:59.6:  13.50 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.55 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:17.28 -20:37:59.6: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.2342 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:55.29 -21:26:31.8:  13.41 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.44 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:28:37.23 -22:39:16.6:  13.70 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:55.29 -21:26:31.8: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.1424 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.56 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:37.23 -22:39:16.6: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.2538 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:28:46.09 -21:01:36.9:  13.64 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.61 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:46.09 -21:01:36.9: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.3302 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:44.55 -21:52:08.7:  13.34 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.45 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:44.55 -21:52:08.7: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.2473 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:28.61 -22:46:39.7:  13.46 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:29:17.26 -22:46:33.7:  13.55 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:29:54.03 -22:17:25.6:  13.77 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:29:57.77 -21:46:32.0:  13.55 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:48.39 -22:46:59.7:  13.36 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:26:42.51 -21:49:09.2:  13.49 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:28.61 -22:46:39.7:  13.61 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.52 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:28.61 -22:46:39.7: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.2351 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:28:29.58 -22:03:50.2:  13.62 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:29:44.06 -21:29:50.4:  14.02 +/- 0.21  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:29:17.26 -22:46:33.7:  13.72 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.62 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:17.26 -22:46:33.7: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.3263 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:29:54.03 -22:17:25.6:  13.59 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.67 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:54.03 -22:17:25.6: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.3229 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:29:57.77 -21:46:32.0:  13.38 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.46 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:57.77 -21:46:32.0: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.2130 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:48.39 -22:46:59.7:  13.34 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.35 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:48.39 -22:46:59.7: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.0842 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:26:42.51 -21:49:09.2:  13.29 +/- 0.11  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.37 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:42.51 -21:49:09.2: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.3159 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:28:29.58 -22:03:50.2:  13.51 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.56 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:29.58 -22:03:50.2: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.3660 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:29:44.06 -21:29:50.4:  13.67 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.80 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:44.06 -21:29:50.4: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.3534 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:19:56.70 -21:18:26.6:  14.05 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:21:55.18 -22:34:57.8:  13.63 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:07.80 -21:15:57.0:  13.75 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:30:54.54 -22:03:27.6:  13.57 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:29:06.36 -21:03:04.5:  13.44 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:07.71 -17:17:03.8:  13.50 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:48.96 -14:57:02.3:  13.61 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:19:56.70 -21:18:26.6:  13.71 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.83 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:19:56.70 -21:18:26.6: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4030 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:26:52.30 -22:02:58.0:  13.66 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:07.80 -21:15:57.0:  13.93 +/- 0.21  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.82 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:07.80 -21:15:57.0: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.4040 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:21:55.18 -22:34:57.8:  13.57 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.60 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:21:55.18 -22:34:57.8: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.3784 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:30:54.54 -22:03:27.6:  13.77 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.66 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:54.54 -22:03:27.6: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4118 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:29:06.36 -21:03:04.5:  13.39 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.41 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:06.36 -21:03:04.5: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.3543 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:07.71 -17:17:03.8:  13.70 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:48.96 -14:57:02.3:  13.56 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.58 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:07.71 -17:17:03.8: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5003 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.58 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:48.96 -14:57:02.3: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.3697 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:26:52.30 -22:02:58.0:  13.43 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.52 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:52.30 -22:02:58.0: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4841 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:23:45.38 -22:23:56.2:  13.40 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:26:21.47 -19:14:24.6:  13.71 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:28:04.97 -20:03:54.0:  13.68 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:28:34.82 -19:08:00.6:  13.70 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:23:16.15 -22:44:03.0:  14.23 +/- 0.25  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:30:21.27 -20:31:22.7:  13.42 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:24:36.02 -22:21:22.4:  13.82 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:23:45.38 -22:23:56.2:  13.83 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.53 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:45.38 -22:23:56.2: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.3204 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:32:20.96 -19:00:53.7:  13.62 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:26:21.47 -19:14:24.6:  13.72 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:28:04.97 -20:03:54.0:  13.59 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.71 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:21.47 -19:14:24.6: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4915 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.63 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:04.97 -20:03:54.0: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4914 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:28:34.82 -19:08:00.6:  13.65 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.67 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:34.82 -19:08:00.6: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4981 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:23:16.15 -22:44:03.0:  13.69 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.84 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:16.15 -22:44:03.0: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5153 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:30:21.27 -20:31:22.7:  13.94 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:24:36.02 -22:21:22.4:  13.60 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.56 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.69 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:21.27 -20:31:22.7: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4593 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:36.02 -22:21:22.4: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5423 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:32:20.96 -19:00:53.7:  13.68 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.65 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:32:20.96 -19:00:53.7: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4554 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:10:51.77 -22:43:30.9:  13.61 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:30:00.22 -14:55:12.1:  13.57 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:25:57.17 -20:42:40.9:  13.74 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:29:13.07 -13:49:10.5:  13.99 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:26:44.24 -19:35:54.8:  13.76 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:35.88 -17:13:48.4:  13.50 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:06.31 -17:36:13.6:  14.00 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:10:51.77 -22:43:30.9:  13.59 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.60 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:10:51.77 -22:43:30.9: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4909 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:29:55.48 -17:03:53.9:  13.73 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:30:00.22 -14:55:12.1:  13.53 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.55 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:00.22 -14:55:12.1: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5307 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:25:57.17 -20:42:40.9:  13.93 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.81 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:57.17 -20:42:40.9: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4541 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:29:13.07 -13:49:10.5:  14.07 +/- 0.21  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.02 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:13.07 -13:49:10.5: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6671 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:26:44.24 -19:35:54.8:  14.01 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.85 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:44.24 -19:35:54.8: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4884 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:35.88 -17:13:48.4:  13.65 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:06.31 -17:36:13.6:  13.94 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.57 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:35.88 -17:13:48.4: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4829 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.97 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:06.31 -17:36:13.6: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6370 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:29:55.48 -17:03:53.9:  14.05 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.84 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:55.48 -17:03:53.9: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5918 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:09:21.17 -20:47:02.1:  13.89 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:30:27.04 -17:41:30.8:  13.69 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:30:11.80 -16:31:09.8:  13.75 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:26:20.50 -21:09:42.1:  13.57 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:06.17 -16:09:27.7:  13.76 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:28:12.23 -21:47:27.9:  14.08 +/- 0.23  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:21:20.55 -22:37:14.8:  14.09 +/- 0.22  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:09:21.17 -20:47:02.1:  13.94 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.91 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:09:21.17 -20:47:02.1: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6953 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:30:27.04 -17:41:30.8:  13.67 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.68 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:27.04 -17:41:30.8: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5950 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:30:11.80 -16:31:09.8:  14.07 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:30:17.00 -20:58:50.1:  13.65 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.87 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:11.80 -16:31:09.8: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6011 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:26:20.50 -21:09:42.1:  13.59 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.58 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:20.50 -21:09:42.1: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6266 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:06.17 -16:09:27.7:  13.83 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:28:12.23 -21:47:27.9:  14.03 +/- 0.23  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.79 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:06.17 -16:09:27.7: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5836 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.06 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:12.23 -21:47:27.9: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.7213 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:21:20.55 -22:37:14.8:  13.55 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.70 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:21:20.55 -22:37:14.8: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5578 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:30:17.00 -20:58:50.1:  13.40 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.49 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:17.00 -20:58:50.1: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6360 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:04.57 -16:21:39.0:  13.73 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:26:26.87 -16:01:02.9:  13.96 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:32:04.56 -13:44:20.0:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:27:23.16 -21:55:59.5:  13.60 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:49:20.47 -21:12:54.5:  13.91 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:30:52.64 -15:52:27.0:  13.96 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:32:28.20 -20:49:27.5:  13.62 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:04.57 -16:21:39.0:  14.25 +/- 0.24  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.88 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:04.57 -16:21:39.0: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6951 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:26:26.87 -16:01:02.9:  13.85 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.90 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:32:04.56 -13:44:20.0:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:32:04.56 -13:44:20.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:26.87 -16:01:02.9: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7003 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:30:15.58 -15:36:07.6:  13.74 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:27:23.16 -21:55:59.5:  13.70 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.65 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:23.16 -21:55:59.5: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6081 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:30:52.64 -15:52:27.0:  13.92 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:49:20.47 -21:12:54.5:  14.05 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.94 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:52.64 -15:52:27.0: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6457 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.97 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:32:28.20 -20:49:27.5:  13.84 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:49:20.47 -21:12:54.5: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7367 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.70 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:28.20 -20:49:27.5: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4899 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:30:15.58 -15:36:07.6:  13.72 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.73 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:15.58 -15:36:07.6: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6444 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:23:52.15 -16:44:11.5:  14.11 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:28:46.43 -16:57:49.8:  13.98 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:09.58 -15:10:59.6:  14.03 +/- 0.21  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:04.71 -15:47:24.5:  13.84 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:36:57.95 -19:04:02.8:  14.00 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:40.04 -14:48:51.4:  13.58 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:30:07.94 -13:33:11.0:  13.72 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:23:52.15 -16:44:11.5:  13.86 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:28:46.43 -16:57:49.8:  13.63 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.95 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.76 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:52.15 -16:44:11.5: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7408 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:46.43 -16:57:49.8: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8104 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:30:46.42 -19:19:01.1:  13.48 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:09.58 -15:10:59.6:  14.31 +/- 0.27  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.13 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:09.58 -15:10:59.6: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.7924 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:04.71 -15:47:24.5:  13.82 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.83 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:04.71 -15:47:24.5: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7188 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:36:57.95 -19:04:02.8:  13.74 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.84 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:30:07.94 -13:33:11.0:  14.03 +/- 0.23  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:57.95 -19:04:02.8: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7888 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:40.04 -14:48:51.4:  14.09 +/- 0.22  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.83 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:07.94 -13:33:11.0: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.5734 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.72 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:40.04 -14:48:51.4: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8161 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:30:46.42 -19:19:01.1:  13.65 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.56 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:46.42 -19:19:01.1: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7387 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:24:37.08 -22:55:15.3:  13.62 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:52.37 -14:33:41.8:  13.93 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:20:07.28 -21:24:01.8:  13.94 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:31:59.46 -19:37:59.4:  14.07 +/- 0.22  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:52.37 -14:33:41.8:  13.83 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.88 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:24:37.08 -22:55:15.3:  13.74 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:52.37 -14:33:41.8: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6629 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.67 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:37.08 -22:55:15.3: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5410 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:20:07.28 -21:24:01.8:  14.12 +/- 0.22  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.01 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:20:07.28 -21:24:01.8: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7688 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:31:59.46 -19:37:59.4:  13.65 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.78 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:59.46 -19:37:59.4: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6227 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21381.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21478.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 83s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21270_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21270_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.40    00:27:06.52 -20:39:59.5   8726 1731   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.36    00:27:06.53 -20:39:56.0   8730 1734   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21271_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21271_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.31    00:12:35.47 -17:15:09.7   6572 3729   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.32    00:12:35.59 -17:15:10.5   6576 3731   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21273_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21273_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.07    00:28:30.67 -20:08:36.4   8920 2053   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.03    00:28:30.62 -20:08:37.9   8924 2054   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21274_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21274_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.01    00:29:55.76 -22:44:41.8   9158 0468   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.01    00:29:55.70 -22:44:41.6   9162 0470   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21276_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21276_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    11.46    23:56:32.24 -14:45:01.1   4170 5110   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    11.34    23:56:32.30 -14:45:01.9   4174 5112   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21290_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21290_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    9.02    00:31:58.63 -13:18:34.3   9359 6227   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    9.02    00:31:58.66 -13:18:34.0   9363 6229   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21321_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21321_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    10.43    23:27:50.55 -17:16:51.0   0124 3246   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21332_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21332_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    10.77    23:53:04.94 -16:02:54.3   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21375_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21375_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    11.33    23:48:48.70 -15:30:34.1   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21381_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
Preparing report for the candidate 21381_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21405_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21405_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    11.75    00:00:26.98 -20:48:31.1   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21407_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21407_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    11.76    23:57:32.99 -13:29:05.6   4273 5886   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21410_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21410_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    11.88    00:04:39.10 -14:21:09.1   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21475_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21475_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    12.42    23:39:41.67 -14:14:12.3   1687 5245   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

**** FOUND  23:39:41.69 -14:14:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21478_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
Preparing report for the candidate 21478_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21481_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21481_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    12.43    00:05:59.00 -20:32:27.2   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21490_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21490_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    12.36    00:03:14.71 -21:02:53.0   5358 1382   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21553_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21553_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    12.83    00:31:29.79 -22:33:32.9   9379 0583   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    12.91    00:31:29.66 -22:33:33.7   9383 0585   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21602_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21602_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.05    00:31:49.23 -22:36:19.6   9426 0555   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    12.96    00:31:49.16 -22:36:19.3   9430 0557   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21611_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21611_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.05    23:58:43.28 -23:05:17.0   4798 0111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21639_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21639_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.17    00:30:17.27 -20:37:59.5   9183 1758   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.32    00:30:17.29 -20:37:59.6   9186 1760   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21640_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21640_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.20    00:27:22.98 -21:44:57.0   8781 1073   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.24    00:27:22.98 -21:44:57.6   8785 1074   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21641_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21641_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.20    00:28:37.23 -22:39:16.4   8970 0522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.34    00:28:37.24 -22:39:16.7   8974 0523   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21642_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21642_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.13    00:31:55.34 -21:26:32.2   9427 1267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.15    00:31:55.23 -21:26:31.4   9431 1269   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21651_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21651_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.16    00:18:16.04 -17:59:54.8   7411 3314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21656_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21656_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.24    00:31:44.57 -21:52:07.7   9406 1006   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.26    00:31:44.52 -21:52:09.7   9410 1007   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21666_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21666_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.30    00:28:46.11 -21:01:36.1   8969 1516   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.39    00:28:46.07 -21:01:37.8   8973 1517   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21668_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21668_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.24    00:31:28.54 -22:46:40.0   9379 0449   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.23    00:31:28.69 -22:46:39.5   9383 0451   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21675_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21675_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.31    00:29:17.32 -22:46:33.9   9067 0448   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.35    00:29:17.20 -22:46:33.5   9071 0450   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21676_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21676_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.21    23:43:05.80 -15:58:21.3   2275 4236   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21677_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21677_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.30    00:29:53.96 -22:17:26.8   9148 0746   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.34    00:29:54.11 -22:17:24.4   9152 0748   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21678_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21678_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.29    00:29:57.76 -21:46:32.1   9150 1061   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.16    00:29:57.78 -21:46:31.8   9154 1063   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21680_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21680_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.30    00:31:48.45 -22:46:57.6   9426 0446   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    12.97    00:31:48.34 -22:47:01.9   9430 0447   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21682_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21682_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.32    00:26:42.53 -21:49:07.9   8686 1029   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.31    00:26:42.50 -21:49:10.6   8690 1030   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21684_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21684_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.32    00:29:44.03 -21:29:51.1   9114 1230   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.39    00:29:44.09 -21:29:49.6   9118 1232   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21686_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21686_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.33    00:28:29.60 -22:03:49.3   8944 0883   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.40    00:28:29.56 -22:03:51.1   8948 0884   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21694_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21694_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.39    00:19:56.66 -21:18:27.5   7715 1320   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.42    00:19:56.75 -21:18:25.7   7719 1322   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21695_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21695_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.35    00:31:07.87 -21:15:56.0   9312 1374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.47    00:31:07.74 -21:15:57.9   9315 1375   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21700_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21700_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.38    00:21:55.16 -22:34:57.8   8020 0551   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.38    00:21:55.20 -22:34:57.7   8024 0553   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21703_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21703_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.42    00:30:54.56 -22:03:28.4   9289 0890   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.41    00:30:54.53 -22:03:26.7   9293 0891   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21708_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21708_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.37    00:29:06.37 -21:03:04.7   9018 1501   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.34    00:29:06.35 -21:03:04.3   9022 1503   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21718_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21718_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.36    00:28:42.20 -22:26:40.3   8983 0652   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

**** FOUND  00:28:42.25 -22:26:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21719_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21719_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.37    00:31:49.00 -14:57:02.2   9348 5221   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.37    00:31:48.93 -14:57:02.3   9352 5223   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21720_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21720_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.41    00:31:07.79 -17:17:03.2   9268 3797   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.65    00:31:07.63 -17:17:04.4   9272 3798   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21722_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21722_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.42    00:26:52.38 -22:02:57.6   8713 0889   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.57    00:26:52.22 -22:02:58.5   8716 0890   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21735_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21735_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.44    00:23:45.37 -22:23:57.8   8276 0668   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.25    00:23:45.39 -22:23:54.5   8280 0670   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21736_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21736_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.46    00:26:21.41 -19:14:24.3   8597 2595   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.52    00:26:21.54 -19:14:25.0   8601 2597   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21742_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21742_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.47    00:28:05.00 -20:03:53.0   8858 2099   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.51    00:28:04.93 -20:03:55.0   8861 2101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21746_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21746_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.51    00:28:34.74 -19:08:01.6   8917 2666   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.48    00:28:34.91 -19:07:59.6   8921 2668   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21758_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21758_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.51    00:23:16.11 -22:44:04.5   8213 0462   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.52    00:23:16.20 -22:44:01.4   8217 0464   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21759_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21759_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.51    00:24:36.00 -22:21:22.2   8395 0697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.59    00:24:36.03 -22:21:22.6   8399 0698   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21760_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21760_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.46    00:30:21.30 -20:31:22.5   9191 1826   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.46    00:30:21.25 -20:31:22.9   9195 1827   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21766_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21766_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.51    00:32:20.91 -19:00:53.9   9464 2747   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.41    00:32:21.01 -19:00:53.5   9468 2749   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21768_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21768_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.48    00:10:51.69 -22:43:31.8   6472 0416   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.50    00:10:51.85 -22:43:30.1   6476 0418   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21771_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21771_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.45    00:25:57.15 -20:42:42.7   8561 1701   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.45    00:25:57.18 -20:42:39.0   8565 1703   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21773_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21773_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.53    00:30:00.21 -14:55:11.5   9078 5232   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.53    00:30:00.23 -14:55:12.8   9082 5234   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21778_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21778_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.57    00:29:13.07 -13:49:10.5   8949 5901   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.90    00:29:13.07 -13:49:10.6   8953 5903   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21779_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21779_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.53    00:26:44.25 -19:35:54.6   8657 2379   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.46    00:26:44.22 -19:35:55.0   8661 2380   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21787_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21787_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.57    00:31:06.35 -17:36:14.7   9268 3602   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.75    00:31:06.26 -17:36:12.5   9272 3604   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21788_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21788_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.53    00:31:35.93 -17:13:48.4   9337 3831   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.45    00:31:35.83 -17:13:48.4   9340 3833   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21793_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21793_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.57    00:29:55.44 -17:03:54.1   9089 3926   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.61    00:29:55.52 -17:03:53.8   9093 3928   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21798_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21798_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.61    00:09:21.14 -20:47:00.2   6206 1583   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.85    00:09:21.20 -20:47:03.9   6209 1584   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21799_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21799_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.59    00:30:27.11 -17:41:30.4   9173 3547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.60    00:30:26.97 -17:41:31.1   9176 3548   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21806_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21806_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.59    00:30:11.78 -16:31:09.4   9123 4259   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.62    00:30:11.81 -16:31:10.1   9127 4260   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21808_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21808_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.61    00:26:20.42 -21:09:40.9   8623 1429   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.65    00:26:20.57 -21:09:43.3   8627 1430   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21811_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21811_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.59    00:21:20.60 -22:37:15.0   7940 0526   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.54    00:21:20.50 -22:37:14.5   7943 0528   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21813_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21813_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.63    00:28:12.29 -21:47:28.4   8899 1049   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.89    00:28:12.17 -21:47:27.5   8902 1050   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21816_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21816_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.58    00:31:06.17 -16:09:29.0   9253 4482   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.59    00:31:06.17 -16:09:26.5   9257 4484   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21819_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21819_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.64    00:30:17.08 -20:58:49.9   9186 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.63    00:30:16.93 -20:58:50.2   9190 1548   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21823_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21823_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.64    00:31:04.51 -16:21:39.3   9251 4358   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.79    00:31:04.64 -16:21:38.8   9255 4360   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21830_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21830_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.69    00:26:26.82 -16:01:02.0   8564 4549   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.72    00:26:26.92 -16:01:03.8   8568 4551   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21831_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21831_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.59    00:32:04.57 -13:44:20.1   9377 5964   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.56    00:32:04.55 -13:44:19.8   9381 5966   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21832_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21832_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.61    00:27:23.11 -21:55:59.1   8784 0961   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.61    00:27:23.20 -21:55:59.8   8788 0962   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21836_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21836_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.68    23:49:20.44 -21:12:54.6   3409 1150   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.82    23:49:20.49 -21:12:54.3   3413 1152   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21839_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21839_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.65    00:30:52.65 -15:52:26.0   9217 4654   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.64    00:30:52.64 -15:52:28.0   9221 4656   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21841_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21841_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.66    23:32:28.17 -20:49:28.8   1003 1169   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.39    23:32:28.22 -20:49:26.1   1007 1171   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21842_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21842_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.64    00:30:15.64 -15:36:07.9   9123 4817   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.65    00:30:15.52 -15:36:07.4   9127 4819   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21845_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21845_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.40    00:27:29.90 -21:44:07.9   8801 1083   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21852_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21852_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.77    00:28:46.54 -16:57:49.7   8919 3984   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.91    00:28:46.33 -16:57:50.0   8922 3985   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21853_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21853_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.70    00:23:52.09 -16:44:10.8   8197 4102   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.80    00:23:52.21 -16:44:12.3   8201 4103   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21857_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21857_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.70    00:31:09.65 -15:10:59.4   9253 5076   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.98    00:31:09.51 -15:10:59.9   9256 5078   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21858_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21858_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.68    00:31:04.76 -15:47:24.8   9246 4706   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.77    00:31:04.65 -15:47:24.3   9250 4708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21859_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21859_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.72    23:36:57.89 -19:04:02.7   1548 2294   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.89    23:36:58.00 -19:04:02.9   1552 2296   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21862_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21862_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.69    00:31:40.08 -14:48:52.9   9325 5304   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    14.09    00:31:39.99 -14:48:49.8   9329 5306   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21863_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21863_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.68    23:30:07.93 -13:33:10.7   0225 5540   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.51    23:30:07.96 -13:33:11.2   0229 5541   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21865_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21865_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.70    00:30:46.31 -19:19:00.8   9237 2560   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.79    00:30:46.54 -19:19:01.3   9242 2562   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21868_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21868_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.68    00:31:52.32 -14:33:42.0   9353 5459   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.65    00:31:52.42 -14:33:41.6   9357 5461   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21870_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21870_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.65    00:24:37.08 -22:55:15.7   8407 0352   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.49    00:24:37.09 -22:55:15.0   8411 0353   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21874_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21874_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.72    00:20:07.32 -21:24:02.1   7742 1264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.84    00:20:07.25 -21:24:01.5   7746 1266   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21877_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 21877_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 24.27455    2461276.77455    13.70    00:31:59.44 -19:38:01.2   9418 2370   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0262.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    13.57    00:31:59.49 -19:37:57.7   9422 2372   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12864_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 12864_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    11.32    00:02:07.31 -14:40:33.8   4984 5206   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

**** FOUND  00:02:07.32 -14:40:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05714_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 05714_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    11.38    00:22:30.91 -18:32:45.4   8034 3003   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

**** FOUND  00:22:30.91 -18:32:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13583_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263
The candidate 13583_fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 24.27507    2461276.77507    8.36    23:43:49.64 -15:17:05.8   2347 4659   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_033736_TTUQ1b1x1_1266831_RU1KYBsm/fd_Cet-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_01-35-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0263.fits

**** FOUND  23:43:49.64 -15:17:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 85s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
23:50:23.69 -16:58:42.8
23:56:53.19 -17:03:28.6
########### Completed Cet-09-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
23:50:23.69 -16:58:42.8
23:56:53.19 -17:03:28.6
###################################################################################
23:50:23.69 -16:58:42.8  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
23:56:53.19 -17:03:28.6  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461276.77454854 -observatory V36
10:00:17.80 +14:04:05.0 Mercury (-1.8mag)
12:56:13.53 -08:38:60.0 Venus (-4.5mag)
06:35:16.87 +23:36:27.7 Mars (1.3mag)
08:57:10.18 +17:46:24.8 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:54:30.97 +02:59:09.1 Saturn (0.5mag)
04:13:09.77 +21:00:38.5 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:14:58.87 +00:05:12.9 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:26:40.75 -23:35:48.5 Pluto (14.5mag)
19:10:36.90 -26:43:46.8 Moon (-11.6mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Aug 24 03:40 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461276.77454854:
08:57:10.65 +17:46:22.6 Io (6.1mag)
08:57:03.44 +17:46:57.2 Europa (6.3mag)
08:57:15.25 +17:45:59.5 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:57:07.81 +17:46:38.9 Callisto (6.9mag)
08:54:39.16 +17:55:33.3 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:57:12.11 +17:46:17.1 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:54:18.87 +17:51:06.5 Elara (17.7mag)
09:01:16.95 +17:18:54.0 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:59:15.25 +18:00:28.8 Carme (19.0mag)
00:54:19.52 +02:59:27.1 Titan (8.4mag)
00:54:24.79 +02:59:11.3 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:55:06.86 +03:01:08.5 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:54:29.80 +02:59:34.7 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:53:33.45 +02:50:21.2 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 24 03:40 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461276.77454854:
20:24:01.83 -12:31:33.3 JWST
15:58:28.60 +49:37:11.0 Chandra
10:15:45.45 -56:58:17.6 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 24 03:40 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461276.77454854 -observatory V36
03:29:58.78 +18:33:57.5 17.5mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
17:59:59.46 -34:26:54.6 14.2mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:08:08.99 -69:34:48.6 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:13:31.29 +33:21:09.2 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
04:25:27.92 +42:52:10.4 17.6mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:25:06.21 +30:11:55.1 17.4mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:58:37.21 +26:14:48.7 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:36:29.56 +27:46:19.2 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:39:34.25 +05:17:40.6 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:16:13.76 -12:57:53.4 18.0mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
20:51:22.65 +63:45:01.8 18.0mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:35:20.96 -14:24:20.3 14.6mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:25:11.66 +32:06:33.9 15.6mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:05:41.34 +15:29:04.2 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:44:56.86 +43:29:17.1 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:46:30.82 +49:41:32.8 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:27:04.59 -12:54:15.4 15.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:05:36.10 +21:15:01.7 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
10:56:08.65 +19:49:15.5 17.0mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:08:46.28 +01:12:39.2 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:13:01.81 +76:03:01.0 16.4mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:09:49.04 +46:20:57.6 17.3mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:00:32.86 +10:05:55.7 17.4mag A/2026 E1
22:14:07.88 -32:48:23.4 7.2mag 10P/Tempel
11:38:57.11 -04:27:11.7 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
11:40:17.27 -00:35:53.2 17.4mag 63P/Wild
00:51:00.04 -06:12:34.4 15.4mag 65P/Gunn
06:10:51.48 +20:08:54.5 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:24:24.33 -25:10:02.4 17.4mag 84P/Giclas
03:13:04.03 +14:37:10.7 16.9mag 88P/Howell
08:34:56.64 +25:16:59.7 16.4mag 93P/Lovas
04:53:25.26 +23:10:03.8 17.2mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
06:48:39.74 +27:56:37.0 16.0mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:56:04.41 +23:43:24.8 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley
12:16:31.21 -16:18:43.1 17.3mag 124P/Mrkos
05:59:21.91 +20:59:37.4 16.0mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:54:59.36 +17:58:30.0 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
23:58:53.83 +03:01:55.4 17.4mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:06:59.07 -18:32:55.1 12.7mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
08:09:46.61 +38:06:12.7 16.1mag 162P/Siding Spring
10:45:04.35 +27:17:49.2 12.3mag 169P/NEAT
03:08:50.88 +09:19:33.2 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
20:16:09.34 -51:33:19.5 18.0mag 259P/Garradd
04:08:47.42 +31:32:25.9 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
07:52:49.97 +36:57:21.0 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:17:08.19 +01:20:15.1 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski
09:15:26.01 +17:34:11.7 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.3K Aug 24 03:40 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60  SN 2026sfn  2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00  SN 2026yib  2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70  SN 2026whu  2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90  ASASSN-26ew  2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00  SN 2026wkv  2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10  SN2026wpd  2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80  SN2026wjs  2026-08-9.35 17.12
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70  AT2026xau  2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50  SN2026weo  2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40  AT2026wdy  2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10  AT2026pvk  2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20  AT2026plb  2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30  SN2026ore  2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30  AT2026oxl  2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20  AT2026ouj  2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20  AT2026ntk  2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.6 15.52
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70  SN 2026obc  2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90  ASASSN-26dr  2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00  ASASSN-26ds  2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 24 03:40 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4  TCP J19570387+3741464  2026-06-18.2638  17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3  PNV J00423204+4110283  2026-06-26.059  16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8  TCP J02191736+2857158  2026-07-12.3549  12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6  PNV J00445643+4157416  2026-07-13.8026  17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0  PNV J00425536+4117270  2026-07-20.1813  17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9  TCP J20354364+6131329  2026-07-20.5443  14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0  TCP J21173148+2225510  2026-07-23.5577  14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8  PNV J00412404+4049028  2026-07-25.0157  18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6  PNV J00430426+4102286  2026-07-26.1512  20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0  TCP J14515140+6613240  2026-07-29.2561  13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2  PNV J00430615+4122082  2026-07-30.0085  19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2  PNV J00413323+4110122  2026-08-02.8913  17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-06.4109  11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8  TCP J22571796+4707418  2026-08-09.3289  14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1  PSN J09133817+7628181  2026-08-09.8037  15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6  PNV J00431729+4126486  2026-08-14.0920  16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6  PNV J00425282+4110586  2026-08-17.7723  19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6  PNV J00425283+4110596  2026-08-18.6119  19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3  TCP J18251276-2225293  2026-08-19.1062  9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0  TCP J18030904+1218140  2026-08-19.5199  14.9mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 24 03:40 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
22:16:10.733 +23:40:31.85  AT 2026xnv  2026-06-14.54 20.5
22:06:02.745 +21:38:59.91  AT 2026xnu  2026-06-14.54 20.68
12:04:33.241 +13:31:43.77  AT 2026xnt  2026-06-16.29 20.66
17:16:17.969 +32:53:41.29  AT 2026xns  2026-06-16.34 20.59
21:48:32.425 -29:28:38.76  AT 2026xnr  2026-06-16.55 19.93
20:44:08.930 -34:45:08.04  AT 2026xnq  2026-06-19.50 20.93
01:40:01.549 +15:24:08.32  AT 2026xnp  2026-06-21.59 20.11
22:59:54.981 +08:47:20.37  AT 2026xno  2026-06-22.57 20.61
22:34:44.112 -34:25:16.33  AT 2026xnn  2026-06-22.58 20.31
15:39:00.625 +01:51:45.97  AT 2026xnm  2026-07-09.30 20.53
22:18:23.260 +08:49:07.23  AT 2026xnl  2026-07-11.59 20.23
23:45:11.366 +23:12:01.58  AT 2026xnk  2026-07-16.50 20.23
17:52:40.604 +30:20:41.11  AT 2026xnj  2026-07-16.29 20.57
22:13:49.877 +15:15:41.07  AT 2026xni  2026-06-22.52 20.47
21:55:12.218 -25:50:43.90  AT 2026xnh  2026-07-08.51 20.23
17:42:05.047 +67:58:50.95  AT 2026xng  2026-08-05.89 19.07
15:05:35.464 +22:40:42.04  AT 2026xnf  2026-07-06.38 20.83
21:55:10.326 +01:47:27.63  AT 2026xne  2026-07-16.55 20.92
17:33:02.208 +23:15:50.89  AT 2026xnd  2026-07-19.39 20.4
17:58:43.835 +19:48:45.18  AT 2026xnc  2026-07-19.39 20.44
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 24 03:40 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Mon Aug 24 03:39:38 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 31s (0.52 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 8s (0.13 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 1s (0.02 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 46s (0.77 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 5 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 2 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 8s (0.13 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 1s (0.02 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 0s (0.00 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 14s (0.23 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 1s (0.02 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 2s (0.03 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 85s (1.42 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 110s (1.83 min)
FIELD_Cet-09-Q1b1x1: 170s (2.83 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 224s (3.73 min)
Finished: Mon Aug 24 03:43:22 CDT 2026