This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.4140 2461274.9140 10.47 20:48:55.55 +33:23:17.1
75.84668 -6.51977 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" V1978 Cyg
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.200 B 14.200 B 89.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:48:55.55 +33:23:17.1: 11.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:48:55.55 +33:23:17.1: 11.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.40 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1978 Cyg,2461274.9140,10.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1978 Cyg 20260822.4140 10.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.4140 2461274.9140 12.21 20:48:29.22 +33:08:48.9
75.59941 -6.59870 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 8.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J204829.32+330850.0
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.180 V 13.450 V 2458014.00000 227.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:48:29.22 +33:08:48.9: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:48:29.22 +33:08:48.9: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J204829.32+330850.0,2461274.9140,12.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J204829.32+330850.0 20260822.4140 12.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.4140 2461274.9140 11.93 20:48:38.39 +30:37:42.5
73.63169 -8.19122 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 8.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" NSVS 8586772
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.240 R1 10.590 R1 2451362.00000 110.000000000000 :
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:48:38.39 +30:37:42.5: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:48:38.39 +30:37:42.5: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 8586772,2461274.9140,11.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 8586772 20260822.4140 11.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.4140 2461274.9140 11.84 20:31:48.70 +30:54:49.1
71.66193 -5.13843 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 8.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" NSVS 8512128
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.800 R1 11.150 R1
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:31:48.70 +30:54:49.1: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:31:48.70 +30:54:49.1: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 8512128,2461274.9140,11.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 8512128 20260822.4140 11.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.4140 2461274.9140 12.37 20:42:21.28 +30:19:53.1
72.55584 -7.30492 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 8.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 7" NSVS J2042209+301949
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.000 R1 Y 0.442 R1 119.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:42:21.28 +30:19:53.1: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:42:21.28 +30:19:53.1: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J2042209+301949,2461274.9140,12.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J2042209+301949 20260822.4140 12.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.4140 2461274.9140 12.40 20:35:22.19 +29:48:36.1
71.22205 -6.40946 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J2035220+294835
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.225 g Y 0.383 g 2458306.12430 97.730105000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:35:22.19 +29:48:36.1: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:35:22.19 +29:48:36.1: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J2035220+294835,2461274.9140,12.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J2035220+294835 20260822.4140 12.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.4140 2461274.9140 12.36 20:39:00.69 +30:56:36.1
72.60872 -6.36213 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.2" and 8.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J203900.82+305634.5
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.780 V 14.080 V 2458377.77750 59.072149100000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:39:00.69 +30:56:36.1: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:39:00.69 +30:56:36.1: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J203900.82+305634.5,2461274.9140,12.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J203900.82+305634.5 20260822.4140 12.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.4140 2461274.9140 12.35 20:50:27.61 +32:54:24.6
75.67140 -7.07154 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J205027.60+325424.5
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.230 g Y 0.400 g 2458685.76500 40.540000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:50:27.61 +32:54:24.6: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:50:27.61 +32:54:24.6: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J205027.60+325424.5,2461274.9140,12.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J205027.60+325424.5 20260822.4140 12.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.4140 2461274.9140 12.30 20:34:21.17 +29:56:41.1
71.19989 -6.15203 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 8.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" NSVS J2034210+295639
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.897 g Y 0.404 g 2458317.52760 92.869110000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:34:21.17 +29:56:41.1: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:34:21.17 +29:56:41.1: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J2034210+295639,2461274.9140,12.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J2034210+295639 20260822.4140 12.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.4140 2461274.9140 12.29 20:50:03.74 +34:22:46.0
76.77259 -6.08221 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 8.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J205003.81+342247.5
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.570 V 13.870 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:50:03.74 +34:22:46.0: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:50:03.74 +34:22:46.0: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J205003.81+342247.5,2461274.9140,12.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J205003.81+342247.5 20260822.4140 12.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.4140 2461274.9140 12.24 20:54:00.95 +34:17:59.8
77.23020 -6.76453 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 8.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J205401.02+341801.7
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.280 V 13.740 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:54:00.95 +34:17:59.8: 13.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:54:00.95 +34:17:59.8: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J205401.02+341801.7,2461274.9140,12.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J205401.02+341801.7 20260822.4140 12.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.4140 2461274.9140 12.08 20:50:29.50 +34:40:38.9
77.06147 -5.96344 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J205029.45+344040.3
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.080 g Y 0.450 g 2458443.67500 48.150000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:50:29.50 +34:40:38.9: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:50:29.50 +34:40:38.9: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J205029.45+344040.3,2461274.9140,12.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J205029.45+344040.3 20260822.4140 12.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.4140 2461274.9140 12.14 20:38:56.01 +31:40:32.6
73.18670 -5.90783 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.5" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J309.7346+31.6766 | 20:38:56.30 +31:40:35.8 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:38:56.01 +31:40:32.6: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:38:56.01 +31:40:32.6: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J309.7346+31.6766,2461274.9140,12.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J309.7346+31.6766 20260822.4140 12.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.4140 2461274.9140 11.82 20:33:25.72 +34:27:31.2
74.73180 -3.31885 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 8.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASASSN-V J203325.56+342733.9
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.580 V 14.080 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:33:25.72 +34:27:31.2: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:33:25.72 +34:27:31.2: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J203325.56+342733.9,2461274.9140,11.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J203325.56+342733.9 20260822.4140 11.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.4140 2461274.9140 12.05 20:35:31.43 +34:02:49.0
74.65892 -3.91187 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 8.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J203531.41+340250.8
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.810 g Y 0.220 g 2458714.83800 494.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:35:31.43 +34:02:49.0: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:35:31.43 +34:02:49.0: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J203531.41+340250.8,2461274.9140,12.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J203531.41+340250.8 20260822.4140 12.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.4140 2461274.9140 11.76 20:38:45.15 +33:04:32.7
74.28543 -5.03301 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 7.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J203845.10+330435.0
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.800 V 14.140 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:38:45.15 +33:04:32.7: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:38:45.15 +33:04:32.7: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J203845.10+330435.0,2461274.9140,11.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J203845.10+330435.0 20260822.4140 11.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.4140 2461274.9140 11.89 20:30:40.61 +31:30:49.0
72.00671 -4.58996 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 8.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 6" ASASSN-V J203040.39+313054.1
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.060 V 13.350 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:30:40.61 +31:30:49.0: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:30:40.61 +31:30:49.0: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J203040.39+313054.1,2461274.9140,11.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J203040.39+313054.1 20260822.4140 11.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.4140 2461274.9140 11.82 20:31:09.43 +31:39:14.5
72.18099 -4.59049 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 8.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J203109.29+313915.1
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.590 V 14.090 V 2457621.80000 79.100000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:31:09.43 +31:39:14.5: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:31:09.43 +31:39:14.5: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J203109.29+313915.1,2461274.9140,11.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J203109.29+313915.1 20260822.4140 11.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.4140 2461274.9140 11.52 20:49:35.64 +34:07:31.8
76.51269 -6.16634 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 8.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J204935.56+340734.0
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.210 V 13.410 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:49:35.64 +34:07:31.8: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:49:35.64 +34:07:31.8: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J204935.56+340734.0,2461274.9140,11.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J204935.56+340734.0 20260822.4140 11.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.4140 2461274.9140 11.31 20:52:23.19 +33:26:53.7
76.35095 -7.04355 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 8.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J205223.23+332655.2
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.730 V 13.140 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:52:23.19 +33:26:53.7: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:52:23.19 +33:26:53.7: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J205223.23+332655.2,2461274.9140,11.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J205223.23+332655.2 20260822.4140 11.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.4140 2461274.9140 10.90 20:50:45.74 +33:23:55.2
76.09693 -6.81178 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 8.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V3075 Cyg
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.100 V 12.800 V 72.300000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:50:45.74 +33:23:55.2: 11.86 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:50:45.74 +33:23:55.2: 11.86 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.86 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V3075 Cyg,2461274.9140,10.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V3075 Cyg 20260822.4140 10.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461203.90848218 12.06.2026 09:48:02.860 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
First image: 2461203.90848218 12.06.2026 09:48:02.860 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Last image: 2461274.91442281 22.08.2026 09:56:36.131 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 30137
Objects passed selection criteria: 29944
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 18889.5
Average stars matched: 18297.2 (96.8647 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 253940 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 20 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-192-g23359006
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-20)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 22 05:00:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461203.90848218 12.06.2026 09:48:02.860 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
First image: 2461203.90848218 12.06.2026 09:48:02.860 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Last image: 2461274.91442281 22.08.2026 09:56:36.131 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 128
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 32 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 210872
Objects passed selection criteria: 210154
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 139278
Average stars matched: 132743 (95.3081 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 669652 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 20 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-192-g23359006
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-20)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 22 05:01:40 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461274.91356426
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:59:58.880 +29:59:11.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:00:15.267 +30:02:09.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:59:58.880 +29:59:11.06
Second-epoch image center 21:00:15.267 +30:02:09.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0771 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:00:18.058 +30:01:36.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:59:58.880 +29:59:11.06
Second-epoch image center 21:00:18.058 +30:01:36.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0802 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:00:15.267 +30:02:09.26
Second-epoch second image center 21:00:18.058 +30:01:36.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01350 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Vy7Up6TIZg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Keh2BjN0KE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eXSG9BXiQH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RHproO2ATh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 32492 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 305.4799 to 324.4585 deg, Dec +24.4805 to +35.2437 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 305.4799 to 324.4585 deg, Dec 24.4805 to 35.2437 deg
Loaded 23048 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 16593 out of 18147 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18147 out of 32492 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.721900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.721900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 32492 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 305.4799 to 324.4585 deg, Dec +24.4805 to +35.2437 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 305.4799 to 324.4585 deg, Dec 24.4805 to 35.2437 deg
Loaded 23048 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 16593 out of 18147 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18147 out of 32492 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 32141 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 305.5305 to 324.5114 deg, Dec +24.4935 to +35.2596 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 305.5305 to 324.5114 deg, Dec 24.4935 to 35.2596 deg
Loaded 23070 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 16511 out of 18056 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18056 out of 32141 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 9 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
2.2 pix Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
3.0 pix fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
3.0 pix fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
15.1 mag. Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
12.9 mag. fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
12.8 mag. fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.8 (SNR ) 10.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.Vy7Up6TIZg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3057, bad_region=0, passed=32492
Got 32492 stars (including 29403 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32492 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 4892 stars left (next iteration limit 5382)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits N_match=4892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.638 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.602 n_q1=1222 n_q2=1027 n_q3=1310 n_q4=1333 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.184
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits -region wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Keh2BjN0KE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3111, bad_region=0, passed=32140
Got 32140 stars (including 29003 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32140 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32140 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32140 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32140 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 4892 stars left (next iteration limit 5383)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits N_match=4892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.590 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.711 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.564 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.641 n_q1=1208 n_q2=1044 n_q3=1309 n_q4=1331 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.205
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits -region wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eXSG9BXiQH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=146, bad_region=0, passed=5640
Got 5640 stars (including 5490 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5640 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4851 stars left (next iteration limit 5337)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4851 robust_rms=8.998 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=18.949 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4851 robust_rms=0.438 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.506 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4851 robust_rms=0.369 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.461 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4851 robust_rms_before=0.716 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.487 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.369 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.592 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.461
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:00:15.282 +30:02:09.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5640 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4054878.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.716 -> 0.369 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits N_match=4851 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.452 n_q1=1499 n_q2=1448 n_q3=1297 n_q4=607 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.203
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RHproO2ATh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=139, bad_region=0, passed=5778
Got 5778 stars (including 5631 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5778 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4846 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4846 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5777 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5777 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5777 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5330)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4844 robust_rms=9.127 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.135 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4844 robust_rms=0.420 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.460 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4844 robust_rms=0.363 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.435 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4844 robust_rms_before=0.713 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.492 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.363 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.603 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.435
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:00:18.073 +30:01:36.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5778 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4054887.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.713 -> 0.363 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.411 n_q1=1327 n_q2=1468 n_q3=1300 n_q4=749 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.195
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits sigma_overall=0.539 worst_q_ratio=1.184
ref2=Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits sigma_overall=0.590 worst_q_ratio=1.205
new1=fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits sigma_overall=0.394 worst_q_ratio=1.203
new2=fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits sigma_overall=0.379 worst_q_ratio=1.195
reference average sigma_overall=0.5645 worst_q_ratio=1.1945
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264_astrometric_residuals.png (4892 matched stars from wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.48 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265_astrometric_residuals.png (4892 matched stars from wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.52 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150_astrometric_residuals.png (4851 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151_astrometric_residuals.png (4844 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cyg-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:48:55.55 +33:23:17.1: 11.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:48:55.55 +33:23:17.1: 11.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.40 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:48:55.55 +33:23:17.1: ref_mag=11.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.4781 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out25718.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52247_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 52247_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:05:11.01 +26:54:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51702_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 51702_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:48.22 +31:45:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18229_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 18229_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:22:46.55 +30:58:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25718_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 25718_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23636_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 23636_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:36:15.75 +32:30:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25111_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 25111_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:44:18.52 +33:08:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16930_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 16930_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:45:40.06 +30:43:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29344_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 29344_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:13.70 +33:58:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16448_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 16448_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:23.89 +30:22:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cyg-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:48:55.55 +33:23:17.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:59:58.880 +29:59:11.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:00:15.282 +30:02:09.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:59:58.880 +29:59:11.06
Second-epoch image center 21:00:15.282 +30:02:09.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0771 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:00:18.073 +30:01:36.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:59:58.880 +29:59:11.06
Second-epoch image center 21:00:18.073 +30:01:36.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0802 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:00:15.282 +30:02:09.13
Second-epoch second image center 21:00:18.073 +30:01:36.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01351 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CCCd4pHgW6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9yj4OfSVRz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IYqYvDqTVN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DdhipfCD69
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 229888 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 305.4616 to 324.5001 deg, Dec +24.4686 to +35.2504 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 305.4616 to 324.5001 deg, Dec 24.4686 to 35.2504 deg
Loaded 23152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12712 out of 18800 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18800 out of 229888 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.580500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.580500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 229888 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 305.4616 to 324.5001 deg, Dec +24.4686 to +35.2504 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 305.4616 to 324.5001 deg, Dec 24.4686 to 35.2504 deg
Loaded 23152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12712 out of 18800 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18800 out of 229888 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 233857 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 305.4658 to 324.5196 deg, Dec +24.4841 to +35.2641 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 305.4658 to 324.5196 deg, Dec 24.4841 to 35.2641 deg
Loaded 23175 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12668 out of 18746 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18746 out of 233857 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 113 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
2.1 pix Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
2.8 pix fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
2.8 pix fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
15.3 mag. Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.2 (SNR ) 12.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.CCCd4pHgW6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=56, blended=37082, bad_region=2, passed=229832
Got 229832 stars (including 192479 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 229832 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 229832 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 229832 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 229832 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5393)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.608 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.584 n_q1=1218 n_q2=1121 n_q3=1236 n_q4=1329 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.176
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits -region wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9yj4OfSVRz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=14, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=76, blended=37728, bad_region=2, passed=233767
Got 233767 stars (including 195764 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 233767 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 233767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 233767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 233767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4907 stars left (next iteration limit 5397)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits N_match=4907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.561 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.645 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.526 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.639 n_q1=1222 n_q2=1128 n_q3=1220 n_q4=1337 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.150
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits -region wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IYqYvDqTVN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1667, bad_region=27, passed=47970
Got 47970 stars (including 46192 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47970 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4850 stars left (next iteration limit 5338)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4850 robust_rms=8.751 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=23.883 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4850 robust_rms=0.444 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.509 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4850 robust_rms=0.370 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.455 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4850 robust_rms_before=0.370 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.462 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.370 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.463 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.455
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.463 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits N_match=4850 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.578 n_q1=1516 n_q2=1388 n_q3=1339 n_q4=607 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.260
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DdhipfCD69 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1683, bad_region=33, passed=48394
Got 48394 stars (including 46619 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48394 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48393 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48393 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48393 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4852 stars left (next iteration limit 5341)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4852 robust_rms=8.956 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.408 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4852 robust_rms=0.424 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.458 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4852 robust_rms=0.362 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.430 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4852 robust_rms_before=0.366 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.467 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.362 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.438 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.430
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.438 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits N_match=4852 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.549 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.545 n_q1=1351 n_q2=1418 n_q3=1344 n_q4=739 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.167
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-55-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0150.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_045715_TTUQ1b1x1_3937022_CvoC5kbQ/wcs_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cyg-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:54:29.38 +34:24:12.8: 12.72 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:16:18.42 +30:15:05.6: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:12:46.41 +25:15:22.8: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:33:18.54 +29:31:45.2: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:32:08.15 +26:58:07.0: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:32:33.16 +27:12:34.6: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:31:18.86 +25:04:45.3: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:29:46.64 +28:40:34.3: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:35:39.74 +29:18:57.6: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:35:27.39 +33:31:36.2: 12.73 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:33:18.54 +29:31:45.2: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:35:27.39 +33:31:36.2: 12.73 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:31:18.86 +25:04:45.3: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:16:18.42 +30:15:05.6: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:32:08.15 +26:58:07.0: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:29:46.64 +28:40:34.3: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:54:29.38 +34:24:12.8: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:32:33.16 +27:12:34.6: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:12:46.41 +25:15:22.8: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:35:39.74 +29:18:57.6: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:33:18.54 +29:31:45.2: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7431 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:35:27.39 +33:31:36.2: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5036 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:31:18.86 +25:04:45.3: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6819 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:16:18.42 +30:15:05.6: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2359 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:32:08.15 +26:58:07.0: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7591 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:29.38 +34:24:12.8: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2000 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:35:39.74 +29:18:57.6: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6035 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:12:46.41 +25:15:22.8: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0174 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:32:33.16 +27:12:34.6: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7739 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:29:46.64 +28:40:34.3: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9355 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:29:03.30 +26:12:42.5: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:33:38.26 +26:26:31.9: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:33:35.42 +33:25:04.2: 10.89 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:32:22.05 +29:03:04.4: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:34:03.75 +34:01:14.9: 12.23 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:26:41.25 +31:56:58.3: 11.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:33:29.08 +34:18:39.8: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:32:48.92 +27:05:53.6: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:35:15.62 +32:10:57.3: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:32:48.92 +27:05:53.6: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:33:35.42 +33:25:04.2: 10.90 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:33:29.08 +34:18:39.8: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:26:41.25 +31:56:58.3: 11.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:32:22.05 +29:03:04.4: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:34:03.75 +34:01:14.9: 12.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:33:38.26 +26:26:31.9: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.90 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:32:48.92 +27:05:53.6: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1892 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:29:03.30 +26:12:42.5: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:35:15.62 +32:10:57.3: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:33:35.42 +33:25:04.2: ref_mag=10.90 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3138 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.16 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:33:29.08 +34:18:39.8: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1840 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:41.25 +31:56:58.3: ref_mag=11.16 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.6910 delta=-0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:32:22.05 +29:03:04.4: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1100 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:34:03.75 +34:01:14.9: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2229 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:33:38.26 +26:26:31.9: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3917 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:29:03.30 +26:12:42.5: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8069 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:35:15.62 +32:10:57.3: ref_mag=12.03 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9960 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:25:32.54 +25:13:45.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:25:32.54 +25:13:45.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:32.54 +25:13:45.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:31:43.63 +27:18:34.7: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:31:51.13 +26:27:27.1: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:32:22.53 +27:01:19.7: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:04:28.66 +24:57:35.4: 11.20 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:35:06.18 +31:46:52.1: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:35:42.70 +31:00:47.1: 11.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:31:04.41 +30:07:15.3: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:39:05.78 +30:22:03.3: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:31:51.13 +26:27:27.1: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:32:22.53 +27:01:19.7: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:31:51.13 +26:27:27.1: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8779 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:35:06.18 +31:46:52.1: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:31:04.41 +30:07:15.3: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:35:42.70 +31:00:47.1: 11.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:04:28.66 +24:57:35.4: 11.20 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:32:22.53 +27:01:19.7: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9536 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:31:43.63 +27:18:34.7: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.20 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:35:06.18 +31:46:52.1: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8142 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:31:06.85 +28:22:54.4: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:31:04.41 +30:07:15.3: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0714 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:28.66 +24:57:35.4: ref_mag=11.20 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0777 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:31:43.63 +27:18:34.7: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0299 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.08 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:35:42.70 +31:00:47.1: ref_mag=11.08 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0998 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:35:53.61 +31:36:25.9: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:39:05.78 +30:22:03.3: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:05.78 +30:22:03.3: ref_mag=11.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6210 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:31:06.85 +28:22:54.4: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:31:06.85 +28:22:54.4: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2816 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:35:53.61 +31:36:25.9: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:35:53.61 +31:36:25.9: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4580 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:26:47.38 +25:00:14.3: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:33:59.56 +27:47:49.6: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:29:40.73 +28:30:39.0: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:37:48.12 +33:22:49.5: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:48:29.22 +33:08:48.9: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:29:33.36 +30:43:38.6: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:24:53.24 +31:11:26.5: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:26:47.38 +25:00:14.3: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:47.38 +25:00:14.3: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4511 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:33:59.56 +27:47:49.6: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:54:30.13 +34:23:54.2: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:37:48.12 +33:22:49.5: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:29:40.73 +28:30:39.0: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:48:29.22 +33:08:48.9: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:33:59.56 +27:47:49.6: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6259 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:48.12 +33:22:49.5: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9405 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:29:40.73 +28:30:39.0: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5387 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:48:29.22 +33:08:48.9: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1766 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:29:52.81 +32:48:10.9: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:29:33.36 +30:43:38.6: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:29:33.36 +30:43:38.6: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5380 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:24:53.24 +31:11:26.5: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:24:53.24 +31:11:26.5: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5201 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:04:02.69 +26:22:04.7: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:54:30.13 +34:23:54.2: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:30.13 +34:23:54.2: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1838 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:29:52.81 +32:48:10.9: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:29:52.81 +32:48:10.9: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5038 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:26:12.63 +30:34:33.0: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:29:32.67 +33:47:11.0: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:04:02.69 +26:22:04.7: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:02.69 +26:22:04.7: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3710 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:26:12.63 +30:34:33.0: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:12.63 +30:34:33.0: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8184 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:29:32.67 +33:47:11.0: 12.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:29:32.67 +33:47:11.0: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6650 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:48:38.39 +30:37:42.5: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:31:48.70 +30:54:49.1: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:48:38.39 +30:37:42.5: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:31:48.70 +30:54:49.1: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:48:38.39 +30:37:42.5: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9336 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:31:48.70 +30:54:49.1: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8396 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:42:21.28 +30:19:53.1: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:35:22.19 +29:48:36.1: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:42:21.28 +30:19:53.1: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:42:21.28 +30:19:53.1: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3574 delta=1.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:39:00.69 +30:56:36.1: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:35:22.19 +29:48:36.1: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:35:22.19 +29:48:36.1: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4009 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:50:27.61 +32:54:24.6: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:34:21.17 +29:56:41.1: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:39:00.69 +30:56:36.1: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:39:00.69 +30:56:36.1: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3488 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:50:27.61 +32:54:24.6: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:50:27.61 +32:54:24.6: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3511 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:34:21.17 +29:56:41.1: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:34:21.17 +29:56:41.1: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3004 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:50:03.74 +34:22:46.0: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:50:03.74 +34:22:46.0: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:50:03.74 +34:22:46.0: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2736 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:54:00.95 +34:17:59.8: 13.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:54:00.95 +34:17:59.8: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:54:00.95 +34:17:59.8: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2348 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:50:29.50 +34:40:38.9: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:50:29.50 +34:40:38.9: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:50:29.50 +34:40:38.9: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0775 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:38:56.01 +31:40:32.6: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 21:32:54.67 +25:55:34.4: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 21:32:54.67 +25:55:34.4: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:32:54.67 +25:55:34.4: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2088 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:38:56.01 +31:40:32.6: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:38:56.01 +31:40:32.6: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1338 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:33:25.72 +34:27:31.2: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:35:31.43 +34:02:49.0: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:33:25.72 +34:27:31.2: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:33:25.72 +34:27:31.2: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8190 delta=1.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:35:31.43 +34:02:49.0: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:35:31.43 +34:02:49.0: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0529 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:38:45.15 +33:04:32.7: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:30:40.61 +31:30:49.0: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:31:09.43 +31:39:14.5: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:38:45.15 +33:04:32.7: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:38:45.15 +33:04:32.7: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7477 delta=1.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:30:40.61 +31:30:49.0: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:31:09.43 +31:39:14.5: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:46:18.82 +34:43:33.5: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:30:40.61 +31:30:49.0: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8255 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:31:09.43 +31:39:14.5: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7604 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:46:18.82 +34:43:33.5: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:46:18.82 +34:43:33.5: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5689 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:49:35.64 +34:07:31.8: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:49:35.64 +34:07:31.8: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:49:35.64 +34:07:31.8: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5072 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:52:23.19 +33:26:53.7: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:45:16.89 +34:29:28.4: 12.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:52:23.19 +33:26:53.7: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:52:23.19 +33:26:53.7: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3098 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:45:16.89 +34:29:28.4: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.08 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:16.89 +34:29:28.4: ref_mag=12.08 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2070 delta=0.88 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 20:50:45.74 +33:23:55.2: 11.86 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-48-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 20:50:45.74 +33:23:55.2: 11.86 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.86 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:50:45.74 +33:23:55.2: ref_mag=11.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9030 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out106413.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out109918.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out116594.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out122833.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out132010.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133249.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out148325.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out149250.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151272.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out175397.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out190986.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out192167.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out198164.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out212084.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out213934.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out219632.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out221525.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out224086.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out225476.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out264878.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 202s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 10s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263663_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 263663_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263668_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 263668_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263672_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 263672_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263673_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 263673_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263681_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 263681_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263690_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 263690_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263692_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 263692_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263693_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 263693_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263694_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 263694_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263696_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 263696_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263699_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 263699_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263702_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 263702_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263703_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 263703_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263704_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 263704_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:43:35.30 +33:20:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263706_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 263706_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263707_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 263707_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263711_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 263711_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263713_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 263713_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263714_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 263714_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263716_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 263716_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263717_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 263717_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:30:53.26 +25:35:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263916_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 263916_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263960_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 263960_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264102_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 264102_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264220_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 264220_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264289_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 264289_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264294_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 264294_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264329_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 264329_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:24:03.67 +25:17:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264390_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 264390_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264463_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 264463_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264578_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 264578_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:54:30.60 +28:05:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264592_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 264592_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:24:33.38 +26:12:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264649_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 264649_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264656_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 264656_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264663_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 264663_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264665_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 264665_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:38:19.96 +34:12:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264767_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 264767_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264778_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 264778_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264829_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 264829_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:21:18.79 +32:37:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264836_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 264836_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264878_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 264878_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264879_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 264879_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264888_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 264888_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:40:53.04 +33:47:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264903_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 264903_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264917_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 264917_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264919_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 264919_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264948_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 264948_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:33:51.84 +26:36:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265001_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 265001_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265067_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 265067_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265076_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 265076_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265188_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 265188_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:36:43.19 +33:00:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265219_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 265219_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:48:03.35 +33:05:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265331_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 265331_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128617_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 128617_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:45:40.11 +30:43:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109262_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 109262_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:44:43.84 +30:02:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122833_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 122833_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133249_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 133249_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67357_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 67357_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:48:33.68 +28:14:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185886_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 185886_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:04:11.75 +33:42:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50138_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 50138_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:10:48.81 +27:26:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116594_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 116594_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39443_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 39443_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:05:11.02 +26:54:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210603_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 210603_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:56:58.68 +34:46:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176647_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 176647_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:44:07.49 +32:54:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205910_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 205910_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:48:52.64 +34:57:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106413_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 106413_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132010_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 132010_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175397_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 175397_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228055_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 228055_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:37:00.35 +33:54:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172795_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 172795_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:02:00.02 +32:48:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109918_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 109918_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 219632_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 219632_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92578_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 92578_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:48:19.71 +29:18:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176910_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 176910_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:49:06.16 +32:56:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221525_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 221525_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212084_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 212084_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149250_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 149250_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24637_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 24637_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213934_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 213934_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224086_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 224086_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121562_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 121562_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:54:28.75 +30:37:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149790_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 149790_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:48.23 +31:45:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67952_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 67952_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:09:35.54 +28:16:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198164_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 198164_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148325_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 148325_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151272_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 151272_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197836_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 197836_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:44:18.51 +33:08:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210619_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 210619_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229182_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 229182_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:41:45.50 +33:53:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221135_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 221135_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:47:43.38 +34:19:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213368_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 213368_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:12:11.70 +34:37:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 225476_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 225476_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 215940_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 215940_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:43:50.63 +34:28:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187016_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 187016_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:56:08.41 +33:41:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166709_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 166709_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:44:31.58 +32:29:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190986_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 190986_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 216317_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 216317_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122792_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 122792_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:14:23.20 +30:36:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192167_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 192167_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133021_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 133021_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:22:46.55 +30:58:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192894_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 192894_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:48:55.55 +33:23:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174082_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 174082_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:36:15.75 +32:30:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168327_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 168327_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:39:52.29 +32:30:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106776_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 106776_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:03:25.74 +29:59:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67270_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 67270_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:54:33.76 +28:03:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118230_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 118230_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:12:55.97 +30:13:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46248_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 46248_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:52:07.67 +27:05:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190826_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 190826_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:53:54.01 +33:26:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121558_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 121558_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:38:59.54 +30:20:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165831_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 165831_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:41:02.76 +32:18:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179902_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 179902_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:13.74 +33:58:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212615_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 212615_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:47:11.07 +34:22:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124232_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151
The candidate 124232_fd_Cyg-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-56-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:23.89 +30:22:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 2s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 214s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cyg-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:48:55.55 +33:23:17.1
20:35:22.19 +29:48:36.1
20:34:21.17 +29:56:41.1
20:42:21.28 +30:19:53.1
20:48:38.39 +30:37:42.5
20:39:00.69 +30:56:36.1
20:31:48.70 +30:54:49.1
20:30:40.61 +31:30:49.0
20:38:56.01 +31:40:32.6
20:31:09.43 +31:39:14.5
20:50:27.61 +32:54:24.6
20:52:23.19 +33:26:53.7
20:50:45.74 +33:23:55.2
20:38:45.15 +33:04:32.7
20:50:29.50 +34:40:38.9
20:33:25.72 +34:27:31.2
20:50:03.74 +34:22:46.0
20:54:00.95 +34:17:59.8
20:35:31.43 +34:02:49.0
20:49:35.64 +34:07:31.8
20:48:29.22 +33:08:48.9
########### Completed Cyg-09-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
20:48:55.55 +33:23:17.1
20:48:29.22 +33:08:48.9
20:48:38.39 +30:37:42.5
20:31:48.70 +30:54:49.1
20:42:21.28 +30:19:53.1
20:35:22.19 +29:48:36.1
20:39:00.69 +30:56:36.1
20:50:27.61 +32:54:24.6
20:34:21.17 +29:56:41.1
20:50:03.74 +34:22:46.0
20:54:00.95 +34:17:59.8
20:50:29.50 +34:40:38.9
20:38:56.01 +31:40:32.6
20:33:25.72 +34:27:31.2
20:35:31.43 +34:02:49.0
20:38:45.15 +33:04:32.7
20:30:40.61 +31:30:49.0
20:31:09.43 +31:39:14.5
20:49:35.64 +34:07:31.8
20:52:23.19 +33:26:53.7
20:50:45.74 +33:23:55.2
###################################################################################
20:48:55.55 +33:23:17.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:48:29.22 +33:08:48.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:48:38.39 +30:37:42.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:31:48.70 +30:54:49.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:42:21.28 +30:19:53.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:35:22.19 +29:48:36.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:39:00.69 +30:56:36.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:50:27.61 +32:54:24.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:34:21.17 +29:56:41.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:50:03.74 +34:22:46.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:54:00.95 +34:17:59.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:50:29.50 +34:40:38.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:38:56.01 +31:40:32.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:33:25.72 +34:27:31.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:35:31.43 +34:02:49.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:38:45.15 +33:04:32.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:30:40.61 +31:30:49.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:31:09.43 +31:39:14.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:49:35.64 +34:07:31.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:52:23.19 +33:26:53.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:50:45.74 +33:23:55.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
20:30:40.61 +31:30:49.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:31:09.43 +31:39:14.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:31:48.70 +30:54:49.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:33:25.72 +34:27:31.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:34:21.17 +29:56:41.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:35:22.19 +29:48:36.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:35:31.43 +34:02:49.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:38:45.15 +33:04:32.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:38:56.01 +31:40:32.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:39:00.69 +30:56:36.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:42:21.28 +30:19:53.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:48:29.22 +33:08:48.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:48:38.39 +30:37:42.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:48:55.55 +33:23:17.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:49:35.64 +34:07:31.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:50:03.74 +34:22:46.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:50:27.61 +32:54:24.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:50:29.50 +34:40:38.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:50:45.74 +33:23:55.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:52:23.19 +33:26:53.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:54:00.95 +34:17:59.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
20:30:40.61 +31:30:49.0 -- a known variable star
20:31:09.43 +31:39:14.5 -- a known variable star
20:31:48.70 +30:54:49.1 -- a known variable star
20:33:25.72 +34:27:31.2 -- a known variable star
20:34:21.17 +29:56:41.1 -- a known variable star
20:35:22.19 +29:48:36.1 -- a known variable star
20:35:31.43 +34:02:49.0 -- a known variable star
20:38:45.15 +33:04:32.7 -- a known variable star
20:38:56.01 +31:40:32.6 -- not a known variable star
20:39:00.69 +30:56:36.1 -- a known variable star
20:42:21.28 +30:19:53.1 -- a known variable star
20:48:29.22 +33:08:48.9 -- a known variable star
20:48:38.39 +30:37:42.5 -- a known variable star
20:48:55.55 +33:23:17.1 -- a known variable star
20:49:35.64 +34:07:31.8 -- a known variable star
20:50:03.74 +34:22:46.0 -- a known variable star
20:50:27.61 +32:54:24.6 -- a known variable star
20:50:29.50 +34:40:38.9 -- a known variable star
20:50:45.74 +33:23:55.2 -- a known variable star
20:52:23.19 +33:26:53.7 -- a known variable star
20:54:00.95 +34:17:59.8 -- a known variable star
Found 1 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
21 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
20:30:40.61 +31:30:49.0
20:31:09.43 +31:39:14.5
20:31:48.70 +30:54:49.1
20:33:25.72 +34:27:31.2
20:34:21.17 +29:56:41.1
20:35:22.19 +29:48:36.1
20:35:31.43 +34:02:49.0
20:38:45.15 +33:04:32.7
20:38:56.01 +31:40:32.6
20:39:00.69 +30:56:36.1
20:42:21.28 +30:19:53.1
20:48:29.22 +33:08:48.9
20:48:38.39 +30:37:42.5
20:48:55.55 +33:23:17.1
20:49:35.64 +34:07:31.8
20:50:03.74 +34:22:46.0
20:50:27.61 +32:54:24.6
20:50:29.50 +34:40:38.9
20:50:45.74 +33:23:55.2
20:52:23.19 +33:26:53.7
20:54:00.95 +34:17:59.8
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461274.91356426 -observatory V36
09:45:40.45 +15:16:46.2 Mercury (-1.7mag)
12:50:23.70 -07:48:11.6 Venus (-4.5mag)
06:30:01.92 +23:38:55.9 Mars (1.3mag)
08:55:33.03 +17:52:52.2 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:54:48.69 +03:01:28.2 Saturn (0.5mag)
04:13:02.49 +21:00:19.9 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:15:07.73 +00:06:14.6 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:26:50.31 -23:35:13.2 Pluto (14.5mag)
17:30:22.38 -28:23:33.7 Moon (-11.0mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Aug 22 05:00 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461274.91356426:
08:55:35.48 +17:52:40.8 Io (6.1mag)
08:55:41.17 +17:52:15.3 Europa (6.3mag)
08:55:49.40 +17:51:37.5 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:55:14.03 +17:54:21.5 Callisto (6.9mag)
08:53:01.27 +18:00:54.6 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:55:31.15 +17:53:01.4 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:52:40.52 +17:56:46.3 Elara (17.7mag)
08:59:40.60 +17:26:06.1 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:57:45.90 +18:06:28.1 Carme (19.0mag)
00:54:44.79 +03:01:53.6 Titan (8.4mag)
00:54:53.23 +03:01:20.1 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:55:24.16 +03:03:09.6 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:54:56.30 +03:01:45.3 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:53:53.39 +02:52:53.1 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 22 05:00 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461274.91356426:
20:12:05.14 -14:00:05.0 JWST
17:40:10.17 +33:40:38.8 Chandra
11:46:09.73 -61:11:10.0 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 22 05:00 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461274.91356426 -observatory V36
03:28:18.39 +18:26:42.4 17.5mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
17:59:54.69 -34:28:31.7 14.2mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:06:33.28 -69:29:34.7 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:13:09.31 +33:18:32.0 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
04:21:14.57 +42:25:23.6 17.5mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:26:40.95 +30:22:21.3 17.4mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:56:57.78 +26:16:56.9 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:34:45.66 +27:50:58.8 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:38:20.47 +05:17:59.0 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:15:40.90 -12:52:50.8 18.0mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
20:53:22.22 +64:03:41.9 18.0mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:36:26.84 -14:14:17.4 14.6mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:23:19.07 +32:00:55.8 15.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:05:42.18 +15:30:14.1 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:46:47.92 +43:29:22.8 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:49:19.41 +49:41:19.7 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:25:48.07 -12:53:58.0 15.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:04:38.47 +21:35:49.1 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
10:53:21.22 +19:57:14.0 17.1mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:07:26.16 +01:21:00.3 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:10:33.94 +76:16:57.3 16.5mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:09:55.42 +46:20:59.8 17.3mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:58:54.25 +09:55:58.9 17.4mag A/2026 E1
22:12:27.02 -32:19:03.3 7.1mag 10P/Tempel
11:37:45.47 -04:19:28.1 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
11:36:31.57 +00:00:21.0 17.4mag 63P/Wild
00:51:36.43 -06:06:20.7 15.4mag 65P/Gunn
06:06:54.08 +20:14:25.6 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:25:47.23 -25:00:15.9 17.5mag 84P/Giclas
03:12:01.66 +14:32:23.2 16.9mag 88P/Howell
08:30:38.18 +25:34:39.8 16.4mag 93P/Lovas
04:47:44.26 +22:26:06.6 17.2mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
06:42:44.54 +28:17:16.7 16.1mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:51:46.82 +24:05:00.8 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley
12:12:38.19 -15:37:33.2 17.3mag 124P/Mrkos
05:56:49.71 +21:01:42.2 16.0mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:52:02.37 +18:05:50.5 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
23:59:36.25 +03:05:55.1 17.4mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:09:33.10 -18:37:27.8 12.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
08:03:47.69 +38:07:17.8 16.1mag 162P/Siding Spring
11:03:36.29 +29:51:17.6 12.2mag 169P/NEAT
03:06:15.42 +09:23:33.9 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
20:16:20.01 -51:48:08.8 18.0mag 259P/Garradd
04:03:25.70 +30:51:00.9 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
07:47:27.91 +37:05:04.9 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:16:12.86 +01:32:54.7 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski
09:13:45.92 +17:39:54.1 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.3K Aug 22 05:00 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 22 05:00 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 22 05:00 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
11:27:30.457 +02:47:32.36 AT 2026xfu 2026-01-14.53 21.69
17:59:19.284 +29:24:54.02 AT 2026xft 2026-07-18.43 20.84
19:54:12.936 -24:01:35.76 AT 2026xfs 2026-05-17.56 19.77
08:44:08.771 +29:07:45.05 AT 2026xfr 2026-01-14.38 20.4
23:28:59.311 -21:41:17.71 AT 2026xfq 2026-07-19.57 21.15
20:34:55.430 -31:12:10.98 AT 2026xfp 2026-07-14.44 20
13:01:30.092 +38:12:35.50 AT 2026xfo 2026-06-23.28 20.85
23:22:05.758 +18:57:29.94 AT 2026xfn 2026-07-25.52 21.28
10:13:35.246 -20:37:42.73 AT 2026xfm 2026-01-27.58 21
21:57:25.287 +03:48:20.98 AT 2026xfl 2026-07-16.55 21.68
14:26:07.382 +33:39:52.18 AT 2026xfk 2026-06-13.34 20.9
02:09:31.559 -03:10:04.80 AT 2026xfj 2026-01-17.24 21.98
20:17:01.562 -20:06:27.94 AT 2026xfi 2026-05-20.56 20.93
21:08:09.912 -21:12:24.85 AT 2026xfh 2026-06-19.58 20.9
20:08:20.135 -25:53:36.34 AT 2026xfg 2026-07-19.45 20.74
14:51:25.078 +41:07:07.07 AT 2026xff 2026-06-13.34 21.62
22:33:15.210 +12:04:33.49 AT 2026xfe 2026-06-21.53 20.23
13:52:05.795 +29:21:47.19 AT 2026xfd 2026-04-24.32 20.92
13:30:27.613 +10:38:39.93 AT 2026xfc 2026-04-20.32 21.07
13:40:18.442 +39:30:10.71 AT 2026xfb 2026-05-24.29 20.6
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 22 05:00 tns_transients_list.txt
