This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3921 2461274.8921 11.66 21:43:26.64 -00:34:48.8
55.36815 -37.70341 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.476 Hedwig 1 -0 1 12.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:43:26.64 -00:34:48.8: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:43:26.64 -00:34:48.8: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461274.8921,11.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260822.3921 11.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3921 2461274.8921 13.04 21:37:43.63 -05:24:02.8
49.20854 -39.11368 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.685 Hermia -0 -0 0 13.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:37:43.63 -05:24:02.8: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:37:43.63 -05:24:02.8: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461274.8921,13.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260822.3921 13.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461208.87407108 17.06.2026 08:58:29.741 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
First image: 2461208.87407108 17.06.2026 08:58:29.741 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Last image: 2461274.89235845 22.08.2026 09:24:49.770 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.75
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10148
Objects passed selection criteria: 10102
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7162.25
Average stars matched: 6972 (97.3437 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 236016 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 20 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-192-g23359006
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-20)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 22 04:28:18 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461208.87407108 17.06.2026 08:58:29.741 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
First image: 2461208.87407108 17.06.2026 08:58:29.741 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Last image: 2461274.89235845 22.08.2026 09:24:49.770 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 67
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 17 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 61646
Objects passed selection criteria: 61517
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 49211.8
Average stars matched: 47516.5 (96.5552 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 281816 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 20 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-192-g23359006
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-20)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 22 04:29:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461274.89176765
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:25:42.918 -01:59:00.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:25:52.432 -01:58:32.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:25:42.918 -01:59:00.95
Second-epoch image center 21:25:52.432 -01:58:32.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0404 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:25:55.274 -01:58:52.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:25:42.918 -01:59:00.95
Second-epoch image center 21:25:55.274 -01:58:52.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0515 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:25:52.432 -01:58:32.81
Second-epoch second image center 21:25:55.274 -01:58:52.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01300 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits &> /tmp/tmp.m6IDmPvlS9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aoTLPj7D5D
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.R12iopRJPE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XlTLxnQh3l
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits and wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits and wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits and wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10566 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 313.5722 to 329.3087 deg, Dec -7.2517 to +3.2860 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 313.5722 to 329.3087 deg, Dec -7.2517 to 3.2860 deg
Loaded 7209 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5977 out of 6221 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6221 out of 10566 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.717700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.717700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.75
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 10566 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 313.5722 to 329.3087 deg, Dec -7.2517 to +3.2860 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 313.5722 to 329.3087 deg, Dec -7.2517 to 3.2860 deg
Loaded 7209 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5977 out of 6221 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6221 out of 10566 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 10647 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 313.5706 to 329.2866 deg, Dec -7.2518 to +3.2812 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 313.5706 to 329.2866 deg, Dec -7.2518 to 3.2812 deg
Loaded 7198 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5992 out of 6227 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6227 out of 10647 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
2.3 pix Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
2.1 pix fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
2.1 pix fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
15.0 mag. Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.m6IDmPvlS9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=660, bad_region=0, passed=10566
Got 10566 stars (including 9895 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10566 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4762 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4732 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4732 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4732 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10566 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4761 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4733 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10566 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4733 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10566 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4733 stars left (next iteration limit 5205)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits N_match=4733 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.536 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.440 n_q1=1267 n_q2=1032 n_q3=1285 n_q4=1149 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.311
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits -region wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.aoTLPj7D5D (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=666, bad_region=0, passed=10647
Got 10647 stars (including 9968 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10647 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4762 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4731 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4733 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4731 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10647 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4762 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4732 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10647 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4732 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10647 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4732 stars left (next iteration limit 5204)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits N_match=4732 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.452 n_q1=1275 n_q2=1016 n_q3=1295 n_q4=1146 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.325
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits -region wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.R12iopRJPE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=189, bad_region=0, passed=3801
Got 3801 stars (including 3606 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3801 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3426 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3411 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3411 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3411 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3801 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3427 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3409 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3801 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3409 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3801 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 3409 stars left (next iteration limit 3752)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3409 robust_rms=12.541 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.219 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3409 robust_rms=0.478 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.523 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3409 robust_rms=0.352 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.391 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3409 robust_rms_before=0.869 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.364 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.352 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.419 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.391
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.419 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits N_match=3409 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=828 n_q2=960 n_q3=779 n_q4=842 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.145
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XlTLxnQh3l (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=200, bad_region=0, passed=3799
Got 3799 stars (including 3596 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3799 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3415 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3399 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3399 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3399 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3799 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3417 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3399 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3799 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3399 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3799 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 3399 stars left (next iteration limit 3738)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3399 robust_rms=12.637 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.788 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3399 robust_rms=0.474 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.529 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3399 robust_rms=0.357 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.418 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3399 robust_rms_before=0.843 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.376 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.357 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.431 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.418
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.431 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits N_match=3399 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.397 n_q1=823 n_q2=954 n_q3=770 n_q4=852 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.181
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits sigma_overall=0.409 worst_q_ratio=1.311
ref2=Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits sigma_overall=0.409 worst_q_ratio=1.325
new1=fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits sigma_overall=0.375 worst_q_ratio=1.145
new2=fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits sigma_overall=0.389 worst_q_ratio=1.181
reference average sigma_overall=0.409 worst_q_ratio=1.318
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394_astrometric_residuals.png (4733 matched stars from wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370_astrometric_residuals.png (4732 matched stars from wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124_astrometric_residuals.png (3409 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125_astrometric_residuals.png (3399 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aqr-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:08:26.82 +03:13:03.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:08:26.82 +03:13:03.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:08:26.82 +03:13:03.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20590_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 20590_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:37:34.30 -00:23:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20616_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 20616_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20639_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 20639_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:23:05.82 +00:50:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20649_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 20649_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:15:01.34 -02:53:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20653_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 20653_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:02:32.71 -06:36:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03199_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 03199_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:10:58.13 -04:01:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aqr-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:25:42.918 -01:59:00.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:25:52.432 -01:58:32.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:25:42.918 -01:59:00.95
Second-epoch image center 21:25:52.432 -01:58:32.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0404 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:25:55.274 -01:58:52.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:25:42.918 -01:59:00.95
Second-epoch image center 21:25:55.274 -01:58:52.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0515 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:25:52.432 -01:58:32.81
Second-epoch second image center 21:25:55.274 -01:58:52.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01300 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits &> /tmp/tmp.g5SvD0YU6s
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0MWaUEVGX6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RUmE6sygUz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.th6VCEzD6K
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits and wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits and wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits and wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 66239 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 313.5693 to 329.3169 deg, Dec -7.2535 to +3.2922 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 313.5693 to 329.3169 deg, Dec -7.2535 to 3.2922 deg
Loaded 7218 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5680 out of 6425 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6425 out of 66239 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.583950
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.583950
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 66239 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 313.5693 to 329.3169 deg, Dec -7.2535 to +3.2922 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 313.5693 to 329.3169 deg, Dec -7.2535 to 3.2922 deg
Loaded 7218 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5680 out of 6425 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6425 out of 66239 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 65905 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 313.5683 to 329.3175 deg, Dec -7.2611 to +3.2815 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 313.5683 to 329.3175 deg, Dec -7.2611 to 3.2815 deg
Loaded 7212 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5703 out of 6425 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6425 out of 65905 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 61 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
2.2 pix Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
1.9 pix fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
1.9 pix fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
15.1 mag. Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.g5SvD0YU6s (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=3855, bad_region=0, passed=66221
Got 66221 stars (including 62279 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66221 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4745 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4727 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4727 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4727 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66221 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4744 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4726 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66221 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4726 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66221 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4726 stars left (next iteration limit 5199)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits N_match=4726 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.446 n_q1=1291 n_q2=1044 n_q3=1233 n_q4=1158 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.249
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits -region wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0MWaUEVGX6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=3874, bad_region=0, passed=65883
Got 65883 stars (including 61939 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 65883 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4747 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4727 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4728 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4727 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4747 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4727 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4727 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4727 stars left (next iteration limit 5199)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits N_match=4727 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.540 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.462 n_q1=1295 n_q2=1028 n_q3=1247 n_q4=1157 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.300
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits -region wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RUmE6sygUz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=812, bad_region=24, passed=32955
Got 32955 stars (including 32035 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32955 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4742 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4720 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4720 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4744 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4719 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4719 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4719 stars left (next iteration limit 5192)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4719 robust_rms=11.393 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.223 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4719 robust_rms=0.482 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.515 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4719 robust_rms=0.357 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.390 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4719 robust_rms_before=0.882 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.370 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.357 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.420 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.390
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.420 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits N_match=4719 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.370 n_q1=1237 n_q2=1349 n_q3=1031 n_q4=1102 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.th6VCEzD6K (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=840, bad_region=25, passed=33243
Got 33243 stars (including 32296 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33243 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4748 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4723 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4748 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4722 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4722 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4722 stars left (next iteration limit 5195)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4722 robust_rms=11.079 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.260 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4722 robust_rms=0.488 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.533 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4722 robust_rms=0.367 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.417 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4722 robust_rms_before=0.853 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.376 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.367 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.418 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.417
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.418 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits N_match=4722 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.389 n_q1=1245 n_q2=1350 n_q3=1034 n_q4=1093 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-23-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_042552_TTUQ1b1x1_2272718_Ecom5l2Z/wcs_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aqr-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:37:06.43 -01:19:26.1: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:32:36.57 -05:00:13.8: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:55:22.08 -03:25:46.5: 13.26 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:32:13.04 +02:19:45.2: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:46:55.47 -00:52:05.6: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:17:26.09 +02:09:43.4: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:19:35.68 +03:10:21.2: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:52:39.43 +00:18:12.1: 13.60 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:47:01.38 -04:17:23.8: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:15:59.03 +02:17:42.6: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:32:36.57 -05:00:13.8: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:52:39.43 +00:18:12.1: 13.62 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:37:06.43 -01:19:26.1: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:47:01.38 -04:17:23.8: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:17:26.09 +02:09:43.4: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:46:55.47 -00:52:05.6: 13.16 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:19:35.68 +03:10:21.2: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:32:36.57 -05:00:13.8: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3413 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:32:13.04 +02:19:45.2: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:15:59.03 +02:17:42.6: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:55:22.08 -03:25:46.5: 13.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:52:39.43 +00:18:12.1: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4656 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:37:06.43 -01:19:26.1: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6641 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:17:26.09 +02:09:43.4: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2465 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:47:01.38 -04:17:23.8: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2185 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:46:55.47 -00:52:05.6: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1868 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:19:35.68 +03:10:21.2: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3050 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:32:13.04 +02:19:45.2: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2056 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:15:59.03 +02:17:42.6: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0419 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:55:22.08 -03:25:46.5: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1787 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:36:09.77 -06:01:22.2: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:54:16.31 +00:46:53.5: 12.73 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:49:15.09 -01:32:52.4: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:19:51.68 +00:22:57.3: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:57:24.40 +02:27:55.7: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:42:59.10 +02:34:56.5: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:39:21.44 -06:37:14.6: 12.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:25:45.41 +00:52:09.7: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:20:15.21 +02:34:40.0: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:55:33.21 -06:18:50.8: 12.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:36:09.77 -06:01:22.2: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:54:16.31 +00:46:53.5: 12.72 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:54:16.31 +00:46:53.5: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9343 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:36:09.77 -06:01:22.2: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5028 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:57:24.40 +02:27:55.7: 12.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:42:59.10 +02:34:56.5: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:24.40 +02:27:55.7: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8175 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:42:59.10 +02:34:56.5: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3450 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:49:15.09 -01:32:52.4: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:19:51.68 +00:22:57.3: 12.78 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:25:45.41 +00:52:09.7: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:39:21.44 -06:37:14.6: 12.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:20:15.21 +02:34:40.0: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:55:33.21 -06:18:50.8: 12.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:49:15.09 -01:32:52.4: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8166 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:25:45.41 +00:52:09.7: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7041 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:19:51.68 +00:22:57.3: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9467 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:39:21.44 -06:37:14.6: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2580 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:20:15.21 +02:34:40.0: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6327 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:55:33.21 -06:18:50.8: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3302 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:51:22.33 -01:00:17.4: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:51:27.57 -03:57:55.1: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:34:15.44 -06:17:38.2: 11.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:23:27.49 +02:45:07.0: 12.62 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:08:26.82 +03:13:03.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:51:57.73 +00:17:06.7: 12.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:27:23.01 -04:54:24.2: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:43:26.64 -00:34:48.8: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:38:20.06 -00:20:40.0: 12.86 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:51:22.33 -01:00:17.4: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:51:27.57 -03:57:55.1: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:51:22.33 -01:00:17.4: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1000 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:51:27.57 -03:57:55.1: ref_mag=11.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8965 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:34:15.44 -06:17:38.2: 11.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:34:15.44 -06:17:38.2: ref_mag=11.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5405 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:23:27.49 +02:45:07.0: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:51:57.73 +00:17:06.7: 12.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:23:27.49 +02:45:07.0: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5913 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:27:23.01 -04:54:24.2: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:08:26.82 +03:13:03.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:08:26.82 +03:13:03.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:43:26.64 -00:34:48.8: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:51:57.73 +00:17:06.7: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2894 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:27:23.01 -04:54:24.2: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4020 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:12:47.63 +02:39:39.5: 13.00 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:38:20.06 -00:20:40.0: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:38:20.06 -00:20:40.0: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6856 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:12:47.63 +02:39:39.5: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:12:47.63 +02:39:39.5: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8367 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:22:22.47 -03:08:40.9: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:05:07.54 +02:33:16.1: 12.94 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:53:01.85 -04:43:03.2: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:50:24.11 -03:55:20.4: 13.21 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:33:34.03 -00:51:22.3: 12.97 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:33:36.66 -00:51:06.3: 12.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:43:34.92 +00:32:07.5: 13.02 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:22:22.47 -03:08:40.9: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:57:35.88 -02:13:51.5: 12.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:22:22.47 -03:08:40.9: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6606 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:05:07.54 +02:33:16.1: 12.88 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:53:01.85 -04:43:03.2: 13.12 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:50:24.11 -03:55:20.4: 13.21 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:05:07.54 +02:33:16.1: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8763 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:33:34.03 -00:51:22.3: 13.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:53:01.85 -04:43:03.2: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8161 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:50:24.11 -03:55:20.4: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0865 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:33:34.03 -00:51:22.3: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0185 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:14:55.50 +01:40:09.8: 13.25 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:33:36.66 -00:51:06.3: 12.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:33:36.66 -00:51:06.3: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0017 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:43:34.92 +00:32:07.5: 13.05 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:57:35.88 -02:13:51.5: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:43:34.92 +00:32:07.5: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1110 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:35.88 -02:13:51.5: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8874 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:14:55.50 +01:40:09.8: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:14:55.50 +01:40:09.8: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1247 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:37:43.63 -05:24:02.8: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:49:27.43 -00:01:50.3: 13.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:03:31.94 -01:35:57.7: 13.03 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:25:30.48 +02:01:21.4: 13.12 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:40:44.21 +01:45:34.3: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:43:00.10 -02:02:38.3: 13.41 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:21:54.77 +02:30:34.1: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:37:43.63 -05:24:02.8: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:03:31.94 -01:35:57.7: 13.01 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:49:27.43 -00:01:50.3: 13.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:40:44.21 +01:45:34.3: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:25:30.48 +02:01:21.4: 13.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 20:58:26.80 +01:17:37.2: 13.76 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:31.94 -01:35:57.7: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0531 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:49:27.43 -00:01:50.3: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3274 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:40:44.21 +01:45:34.3: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2101 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:25:30.48 +02:01:21.4: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2701 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_03-58-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0394.fits at 21:37:27.55 -01:34:03.2: 13.49 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:43:00.10 -02:02:38.3: 13.45 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:43:00.10 -02:02:38.3: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3623 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:21:54.77 +02:30:34.1: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:21:54.77 +02:30:34.1: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3941 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:58:26.80 +01:17:37.2: 13.81 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:26.80 +01:17:37.2: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4951 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_04-07-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 21:37:27.55 -01:34:03.2: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:37:27.55 -01:34:03.2: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5781 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out81573.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82302.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81315_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 81315_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81320_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 81320_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81325_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 81325_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81327_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 81327_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81329_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 81329_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81330_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 81330_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81332_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 81332_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81334_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 81334_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81336_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 81336_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81337_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 81337_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81339_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 81339_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81340_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 81340_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81343_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 81343_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81344_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 81344_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81345_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 81345_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81347_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 81347_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81348_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 81348_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81352_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 81352_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81353_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 81353_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81354_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 81354_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81355_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 81355_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81356_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 81356_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81357_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 81357_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81360_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 81360_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:21:48.07 +02:01:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81361_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 81361_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:37:34.31 -00:23:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81390_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 81390_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81573_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
Preparing report for the candidate 81573_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81726_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 81726_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81824_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 81824_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81933_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 81933_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81936_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 81936_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:31:37.79 -05:36:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81939_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 81939_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81997_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 81997_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82004_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 82004_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:37:34.12 -00:22:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82040_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 82040_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82066_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 82066_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82080_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 82080_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:31:38.66 -05:36:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82093_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 82093_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82123_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 82123_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82145_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 82145_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82149_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 82149_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82200_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 82200_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82206_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 82206_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82230_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 82230_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82302_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
Preparing report for the candidate 82302_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82304_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 82304_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82323_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 82323_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82334_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 82334_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82385_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 82385_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82423_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 82423_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:03:09.52 +01:31:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82459_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 82459_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82492_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 82492_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82509_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 82509_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82521_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 82521_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46629_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 46629_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:48:04.87 +00:22:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24618_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 24618_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:15:01.33 -02:53:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59612_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 59612_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:23:05.82 +00:50:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59257_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 59257_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:06:17.86 +00:52:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17066_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 17066_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:10:58.13 -04:01:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02940_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 02940_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:02:32.74 -06:36:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45334_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125
The candidate 45334_fd_Aqr-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_04-24-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks