NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Aur-05-Q2b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 08 22.36296    2461274.86296    12.28    04:56:58.90 +28:03:58.6   4418 2043   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    12.28    04:56:58.91 +28:03:58.8   4418 2042   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 22.3632  2461274.8632  12.28  04:56:58.91 +28:03:58.7
174.64743  -9.29757 galactic  Tau  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 1.2 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
63 Ausonia                  0     -1       1  12.5     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:56:58.91 +28:03:58.7:  16.31 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:56:58.91 +28:03:58.7:  16.31 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Aur-05-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 08 22.36296    2461274.86296    12.89    04:47:56.04 +25:47:05.6   3150 0697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    12.81    04:47:55.87 +25:47:11.2   3150 0697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 22.3632  2461274.8632  12.85  04:47:55.95 +25:47:08.4
175.20619 -12.29218 galactic  Tau  Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.1" and 0.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 04:47:55.95 +25:47:08.4 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:47:55.95 +25:47:08.4:  16.14 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:47:55.95 +25:47:08.4:  16.16 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Aur-05-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 08 22.36296    2461274.86296    13.11    04:53:37.28 +33:33:56.3   4074 5381   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    13.11    04:53:37.47 +33:34:04.4   4074 5381   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 22.3632  2461274.8632  13.11  04:53:37.38 +33:34:00.3
169.83393  -6.46123 galactic  Aur  Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.5" and 0.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 04:53:37.38 +33:34:00.3 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:53:37.38 +33:34:00.3:  16.26 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:53:37.38 +33:34:00.3:  16.26 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Aur-05-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 3

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Aur-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Field Aur-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Field Aur-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Field Aur-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.nao.ac.jp
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.nao.ac.jp)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Aur-05-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Aur-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Aur-05-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 685586 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 685586 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.png' -> 'transient_report/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits_preview.png'
Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits

renamed 'Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.png' -> 'transient_report/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits_preview.png'
Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 565.0960 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 645.3049 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1686.3095 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 347.6994 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1684.7365 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 349.4011 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.98411 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.005 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 23.0499992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 24.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-22T03:42:29.5917495' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-22T08:42:29.5917495' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61274.3628424886 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-22T08:42:39.4947883' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61274.3629571064 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 74.9958471551319 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 29.9999977390342 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 26.8894444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 70.3530555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.2027942841431 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Aur-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '05 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20461 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20461 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 23.0499992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 23.0499992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 44.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.29 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 66.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.700376 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/d_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits :) Spent 0.871879 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/d_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 23.0100002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 24.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-22T03:43:07.3800712' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-22T08:43:07.3800712' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61274.3632798609 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-22T08:43:17.2837178' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61274.3633944793 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 74.9958470792609 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 29.9999977329307 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 27.0136111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 70.4186111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.19351586156381 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Aur-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '05 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20461 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20461 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 23.0100002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 23.0100002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 44.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.29 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 66.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.700376 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/d_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits :) Spent 0.640995 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/d_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits


fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461274.86295823 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits Image size: 938.0'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:59:36.445 +29:59:02.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 Second-epoch image center 04:59:36.445 +29:59:02.64 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0894 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Image size: 938.0'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:59:36.327 +29:59:09.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 Second-epoch image center 04:59:36.327 +29:59:09.92 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0896 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:59:36.445 +29:59:02.64 Second-epoch second image center 04:59:36.327 +29:59:09.92 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00207 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UdYs1cwCiA Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qBFlTRnOMS Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eJ8uioJVSk Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FWDYHfb6Ue Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.988300 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.988300 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=6.0) Read 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2864 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2864 deg Loaded 8429 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6042 out of 6743 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6743 out of 16349 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=6.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 1.9 pix Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 2.4 pix fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits 2.4 pix fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 15.4 mag. Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 12.6 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits 12.7 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.6 (SNR ) 10.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.UdYs1cwCiA (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1498, bad_region=2648, passed=16295 Got 16295 stars (including 12280 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4802 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14059 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14059 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14059 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 4802 stars left (next iteration limit 5283) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4802 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.270 n_q1=2427 n_q2=542 n_q3=1323 n_q4=510 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.062 The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.qBFlTRnOMS (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1486, bad_region=2654, passed=16349 Got 16349 stars (including 12341 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4798 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14119 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14119 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14119 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 4797 stars left (next iteration limit 5277) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4797 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=2431 n_q2=544 n_q3=1317 n_q4=505 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.088 The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.eJ8uioJVSk (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=87, bad_region=766, passed=2255 Got 2255 stars (including 1431 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2255 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1386 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1375 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1364 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1375 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1609 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1386 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1375 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1609 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1375 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1609 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53" Excluding outliers - 1375 stars left (next iteration limit 1512) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1375 robust_rms=6.771 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.076 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1375 robust_rms=0.537 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.726 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1375 robust_rms=0.478 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.545 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1375 robust_rms_before=0.991 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.530 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.478 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.618 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.545 verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits Image size: 938.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:59:36.444 +29:59:01.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 2255 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky487880.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.991 -> 0.478 arcsec) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits N_match=1375 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.594 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.524 n_q1=230 n_q2=282 n_q3=444 n_q4=419 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.185 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.FWDYHfb6Ue (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=96, bad_region=758, passed=2282 Got 2282 stars (including 1458 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2282 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.6 to 35.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1415 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1401 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1387 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1401 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1642 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.6 to 35.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1415 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1402 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1643 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1402 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1643 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51" Excluding outliers - 1402 stars left (next iteration limit 1541) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1402 robust_rms=6.487 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.480 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1402 robust_rms=0.512 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.724 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1402 robust_rms=0.465 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.544 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1402 robust_rms_before=0.965 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.508 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.465 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.582 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.544 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.582 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits N_match=1402 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.587 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.512 n_q1=224 n_q2=281 n_q3=462 n_q4=435 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits sigma_overall=0.392 worst_q_ratio=1.062 ref2=Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits sigma_overall=0.375 worst_q_ratio=1.088 new1=fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits sigma_overall=0.501 worst_q_ratio=1.185 new2=fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits sigma_overall=0.530 worst_q_ratio=1.107 reference average sigma_overall=0.3835 worst_q_ratio=1.075 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362_astrometric_residuals.png (4802 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363_astrometric_residuals.png (4797 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110_astrometric_residuals.png (1375 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111_astrometric_residuals.png (1402 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits Image size: 938.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:59:36.444 +29:59:01.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 Second-epoch image center 04:59:36.444 +29:59:01.77 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0894 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Image size: 938.0'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:59:36.327 +29:59:09.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 Second-epoch image center 04:59:36.327 +29:59:09.92 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0896 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:59:36.444 +29:59:01.77 Second-epoch second image center 04:59:36.327 +29:59:09.92 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00230 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IFkUhmDcQt Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7AlhB76hO7 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CTh327LCY5 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KJlmBJIf5k Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6872 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6872 out of 129003 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.844750 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.844750 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6872 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6872 out of 129003 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=4.5) Read 129055 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.2955 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.2955 deg Loaded 8479 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4936 out of 6881 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6881 out of 129055 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=4.5) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 61 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.8 pix Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 1.9 pix Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 2.1 pix fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits 2.1 pix fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 13.3 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits 13.3 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.3 (SNR ) 13.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.IFkUhmDcQt (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=14027, bad_region=17069, passed=128967 Got 128967 stars (including 98817 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 128967 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4808 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4808 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4808 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 115105 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4807 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 115105 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4807 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 115105 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4807 stars left (next iteration limit 5288) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4807 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.242 n_q1=2304 n_q2=551 n_q3=1396 n_q4=556 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.069 The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.7AlhB76hO7 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=35, blended=13827, bad_region=17077, passed=129020 Got 129020 stars (including 99020 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 129020 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4835 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 115170 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4835 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 115170 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 115170 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4803 stars left (next iteration limit 5283) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=2300 n_q2=559 n_q3=1387 n_q4=557 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.066 The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.CTh327LCY5 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=510, bad_region=5289, passed=22263 Got 22263 stars (including 16635 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22263 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4776 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18540 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18540 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18540 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55" Excluding outliers - 4781 stars left (next iteration limit 5258) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=6.020 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=7.385 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=0.618 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.837 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4781 robust_rms=0.551 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.625 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4781 robust_rms_before=0.560 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.566 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.551 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.623 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.625 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.623 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits N_match=4781 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.564 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.613 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.564 n_q1=804 n_q2=944 n_q3=1484 n_q4=1549 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.077 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.KJlmBJIf5k (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=532, bad_region=5395, passed=22548 Got 22548 stars (including 16805 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22548 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4769 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18787 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18787 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18787 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55" Excluding outliers - 4771 stars left (next iteration limit 5249) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=5.949 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=7.363 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=0.602 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.782 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=0.538 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.600 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4771 robust_rms_before=0.986 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.563 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.538 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.641 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.600 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.641 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits N_match=4771 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.564 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.559 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.642 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.539 n_q1=799 n_q2=956 n_q3=1467 n_q4=1549 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.139 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:52:18.14 +31:47:11.9: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:56:57.85 +33:05:58.6: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:56:58.91 +28:03:58.7: 16.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:52:18.14 +31:47:11.9: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:56:57.85 +33:05:58.6: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:52:18.14 +31:47:11.9: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4563 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:56:57.85 +33:05:58.6: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8715 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:11:02.43 +32:02:01.0: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:56:58.91 +28:03:58.7: 16.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:47:55.95 +25:47:08.4: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:14:54.12 +31:02:58.9: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:11:02.43 +32:02:01.0: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:53:37.38 +33:34:00.3: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:11:02.43 +32:02:01.0: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5168 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:47:55.95 +25:47:08.4: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:14:54.12 +31:02:58.9: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:14:54.12 +31:02:58.9: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7621 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:53:37.38 +33:34:00.3: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151193.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out152367.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out152560.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 560s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 149641_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 149641_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    13.22    04:57:16.70 +29:07:56.0   4473 2685   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits **** FOUND 04:57:16.70 +29:07:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 149649_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 149649_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 22.36296    2461274.86296    12.49    04:52:18.13 +31:47:11.5   3871 4309   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    12.43    04:52:18.15 +31:47:12.4   3871 4307   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 149836_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 149836_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    10.19    05:15:43.55 +26:20:06.9   6939 0981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 149903_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 149903_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    10.52    04:53:57.43 +28:19:00.3   4020 2204   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 150312_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 150312_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    11.45    05:16:15.10 +26:38:26.8   7007 1168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 150498_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 150498_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    11.74    04:43:17.33 +33:48:37.4   2777 5588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 150621_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 150621_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    11.80    05:12:29.99 +28:06:29.8   6488 2053   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 150678_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 150678_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    11.79    05:16:24.47 +33:34:30.4   6950 5374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 150703_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 150703_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 22.36296    2461274.86296    11.87    04:56:57.87 +33:05:58.6   4489 5086   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    11.87    04:56:57.82 +33:05:58.6   4489 5085   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 150736_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 150736_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    11.98    04:48:32.98 +29:27:53.6   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 150784_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 150784_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    12.08    05:18:18.01 +33:47:33.8   7187 5513   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits **** FOUND 05:18:18.03 +33:47:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 150829_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 150829_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    11.93    04:41:14.17 +28:37:42.4   2336 2464   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits **** FOUND 04:41:14.15 +28:37:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 150950_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 150950_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    11.91    05:17:08.06 +27:15:33.1   7119 1546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151088_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 151088_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    12.15    05:04:44.21 +32:24:43.7   5470 4654   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151193_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 Preparing report for the candidate 151193_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151266_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 151266_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    12.42    05:16:00.39 +29:33:57.5   6941 2942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151313_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 151313_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    12.39    05:10:04.48 +33:52:35.3   6148 5544   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151337_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 151337_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    12.25    04:56:56.99 +33:06:50.9   4487 5094   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits **** FOUND 04:56:56.94 +33:06:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151463_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 151463_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    12.73    04:56:31.58 +32:52:59.4   4430 4955   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151469_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 151469_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    12.50    04:44:59.00 +25:53:21.2   2750 0776   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151512_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 151512_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    12.26    05:15:29.74 +32:42:36.8   6843 4846   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits **** FOUND 05:15:29.77 +32:42:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151514_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 151514_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    12.59    05:05:45.97 +26:25:46.2   5585 1033   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits **** FOUND 05:05:45.93 +26:25:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151584_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 151584_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    12.38    04:54:01.31 +34:02:04.0   4133 5663   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151665_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 151665_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    12.68    04:51:21.95 +28:31:17.5   3680 2339   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits **** FOUND 04:51:21.94 +28:31:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151764_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 151764_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    12.42    05:12:52.31 +26:06:37.0   6552 0840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151794_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 151794_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    12.69    04:40:01.72 +26:00:31.3   2076 0882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151824_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 151824_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    12.32    04:40:02.15 +30:18:24.1   2238 3489   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151836_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 151836_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 22.36296    2461274.86296    12.61    05:11:02.46 +32:02:01.7   6277 4428   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    12.45    05:11:02.41 +32:02:00.3   6277 4427   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151839_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 151839_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    12.49    04:56:40.32 +33:56:05.5   4464 5593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151891_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 151891_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    12.60    04:41:21.00 +30:57:29.4   2433 3873   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151910_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 151910_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    12.60    05:03:52.89 +32:59:13.1   5364 5003   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 152124_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 152124_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    12.76    05:11:02.97 +30:58:48.4   6282 3789   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 152229_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 152229_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    12.66    04:55:25.68 +27:11:56.7   4197 1522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 152269_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 152269_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    12.82    04:41:17.14 +27:53:16.9   2316 2015   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 152323_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 152323_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    12.75    04:52:40.22 +29:21:55.4   3870 2843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 152359_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 152359_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    12.81    04:49:10.81 +26:09:14.5   3330 0914   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 152367_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 Preparing report for the candidate 152367_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 152419_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 152419_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 22.36296    2461274.86296    12.86    05:14:54.11 +31:02:58.6   6781 3839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    12.70    05:14:54.13 +31:02:59.3   6782 3838   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 152517_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 152517_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    13.24    05:04:49.95 +29:58:33.7   5472 3181   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits **** FOUND 05:04:49.89 +29:58:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 152560_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 Preparing report for the candidate 152560_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 152561_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 152561_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    12.84    04:39:20.07 +32:50:01.7   2241 5026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 152589_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 152589_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    13.13    04:50:11.05 +34:03:58.1   3652 5700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 152610_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 152610_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    13.07    05:11:52.90 +29:42:25.3   6397 3020   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51524_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 51524_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    13.09    05:09:49.43 +31:40:28.1   6121 4208   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69845_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 69845_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    12.39    05:10:01.67 +30:25:10.4   6151 3449   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 143713_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 143713_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    10.91    05:10:32.21 +32:10:41.7   6212 4514   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits **** FOUND 05:10:32.19 +32:10:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    12.40    05:15:47.47 +26:45:15.5   6943 1236   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits **** FOUND 05:15:47.44 +26:45:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 121914_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 121914_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    12.34    05:09:38.49 +28:39:27.5   6105 2383   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits **** FOUND 05:09:38.49 +28:39:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    12.44    05:03:15.39 +28:42:53.2   5259 2420   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits **** FOUND 05:03:15.38 +28:42:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 107910_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 107910_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    12.01    05:09:07.29 +26:08:22.2   6041 0856   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits **** FOUND 05:09:07.26 +26:08:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66692_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 66692_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    7.16    05:04:14.49 +30:29:39.1   5397 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits **** FOUND 05:04:14.51 +30:29:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75122_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 75122_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    7.10    05:11:38.13 +29:54:11.7   6363 3138   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits **** FOUND 05:11:38.13 +29:54:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 122846_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 122846_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    6.95    05:09:45.10 +28:01:49.8   6121 2004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits **** FOUND 05:09:45.11 +28:01:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 119884_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 119884_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    7.09    04:52:47.21 +27:53:50.9   3856 1955   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits **** FOUND 04:52:47.22 +27:53:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53689_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 53689_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    6.93    04:49:12.97 +31:26:10.5   3466 4111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits **** FOUND 04:49:12.99 +31:26:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 25109_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 25109_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    6.62    04:56:59.67 +33:09:51.3   4493 5124   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits **** FOUND 04:56:59.68 +33:09:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 37731_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 37731_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    7.02    04:49:19.17 +32:35:15.2   3508 4807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits **** FOUND 04:49:19.17 +32:35:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33443_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 33443_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    6.64    05:15:24.10 +32:41:13.4   6831 4831   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits **** FOUND 05:15:24.10 +32:41:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21034_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 21034_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    6.55    05:18:10.36 +33:22:10.7   7176 5255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits **** FOUND 05:18:10.36 +33:22:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 12946_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 12946_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    6.52    05:20:00.74 +33:57:28.0   7402 5621   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits **** FOUND 05:20:00.77 +33:57:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 16231_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 16231_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.36340    2461274.86340    6.61    05:19:00.06 +33:44:54.0   7276 5489   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_035015_TTUQ2b1x1_4008125_lpYEOiMU/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits **** FOUND 05:19:00.05 +33:44:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 563s Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 04:56:58.91 +28:03:58.7 04:47:55.95 +25:47:08.4 04:53:37.38 +33:34:00.3 ########### Completed Aur-05-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 04:56:58.91 +28:03:58.7 04:47:55.95 +25:47:08.4 04:53:37.38 +33:34:00.3 ################################################################################### 04:56:58.91 +28:03:58.7 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 04:47:55.95 +25:47:08.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) 04:53:37.38 +33:34:00.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' 04:47:55.95 +25:47:08.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) 04:53:37.38 +33:34:00.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) 04:47:55.95 +25:47:08.4 -- not a known variable star 04:53:37.38 +33:34:00.3 -- not a known variable star Found 2 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 2 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 04:47:55.95 +25:47:08.4 04:53:37.38 +33:34:00.3 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461274.86295823 -observatory V36 09:45:16.26 +15:18:39.9 Mercury (-1.7mag) 12:50:13.83 -07:46:48.2 Venus (-4.5mag) 06:29:53.32 +23:38:58.9 Mars (1.3mag) 08:55:30.36 +17:53:02.6 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:54:49.17 +03:01:31.9 Saturn (0.5mag) 04:13:02.28 +21:00:19.3 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:15:07.98 +00:06:16.3 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:26:50.59 -23:35:12.2 Pluto (14.5mag) 17:27:24.70 -28:29:37.1 Moon (-11.0mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Aug 22 03:58 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461274.86295823: 08:55:33.88 +17:52:46.3 Io (6.1mag) 08:55:37.85 +17:52:28.7 Europa (6.3mag) 08:55:46.51 +17:51:49.0 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:55:11.02 +17:54:33.5 Callisto (6.9mag) 08:52:58.59 +18:01:03.3 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:55:29.21 +17:53:08.7 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:52:37.83 +17:56:55.4 Elara (17.7mag) 08:59:37.95 +17:26:17.7 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:57:43.45 +18:06:37.8 Carme (19.0mag) 00:54:45.52 +03:01:57.2 Titan (8.4mag) 00:54:53.79 +03:01:22.9 Rhea (9.7mag) 00:55:24.62 +03:03:12.8 Iapetus (11.1mag) 00:54:57.00 +03:01:48.6 Hyperion (14.4mag) 00:53:53.94 +02:52:57.2 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 22 03:58 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461274.86295823: 20:11:54.94 -14:03:22.7 JWST 17:34:42.17 +35:08:56.4 Chandra 11:08:50.00 -59:49:51.1 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 22 03:58 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461274.86295823 -observatory V36 03:28:15.66 +18:26:30.1 17.5mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 17:59:54.62 -34:28:34.8 14.2mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:06:30.65 -69:29:26.1 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:13:08.69 +33:18:27.6 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 04:21:07.78 +42:24:35.2 17.5mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:26:43.55 +30:22:38.1 17.4mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:56:55.05 +26:17:00.1 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:34:42.81 +27:51:06.4 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:38:18.44 +05:17:59.4 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:15:40.01 -12:52:42.7 18.0mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 20:53:25.58 +64:04:12.1 18.0mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 15:36:28.67 -14:14:01.1 14.6mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:23:15.96 +32:00:46.4 15.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:05:42.22 +15:30:16.0 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:46:51.02 +43:29:22.9 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:49:24.04 +49:41:18.9 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:25:45.98 -12:53:57.6 15.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:04:36.86 +21:36:22.7 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 10:53:16.65 +19:57:26.9 17.1mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:07:23.97 +01:21:13.8 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:10:30.04 +76:17:20.5 16.5mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:09:55.57 +46:20:59.2 17.3mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:58:51.53 +09:55:42.5 17.4mag A/2026 E1 22:12:24.63 -32:18:14.8 7.1mag 10P/Tempel 11:37:43.50 -04:19:15.6 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 11:36:25.37 +00:01:20.2 17.4mag 63P/Wild 00:51:37.43 -06:06:10.7 15.4mag 65P/Gunn 06:06:47.59 +20:14:33.9 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 20:25:49.61 -25:00:00.2 17.5mag 84P/Giclas 03:11:59.95 +14:32:14.8 16.9mag 88P/Howell 08:30:31.07 +25:35:08.1 16.4mag 93P/Lovas 04:47:35.09 +22:24:54.2 17.2mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 06:42:34.83 +28:17:48.9 16.1mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 09:51:39.75 +24:05:35.6 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley 12:12:31.80 -15:36:25.8 17.3mag 124P/Mrkos 05:56:45.55 +21:01:45.2 16.0mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 06:51:57.52 +18:06:02.1 17.9mag 131P/Mueller 23:59:37.42 +03:06:01.3 17.4mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 03:09:37.11 -18:37:34.6 12.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 08:03:37.83 +38:07:18.4 16.1mag 162P/Siding Spring 11:04:08.45 +29:55:32.0 12.2mag 169P/NEAT 03:06:11.20 +09:23:39.6 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 20:16:20.57 -51:48:33.6 18.0mag 259P/Garradd 04:03:17.03 +30:49:51.7 15.3mag 260P/McNaught 07:47:19.09 +37:05:16.5 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:16:11.36 +01:33:15.3 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski 09:13:43.18 +17:40:03.3 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.3K Aug 22 03:58 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 22 03:58 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 22 03:58 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 08:44:08.771 +29:07:45.05 AT 2026xfr 2026-01-14.38 20.4 23:28:59.311 -21:41:17.71 AT 2026xfq 2026-07-19.57 21.15 20:34:55.430 -31:12:10.98 AT 2026xfp 2026-07-14.44 20 13:01:30.092 +38:12:35.50 AT 2026xfo 2026-06-23.28 20.85 23:22:05.758 +18:57:29.94 AT 2026xfn 2026-07-25.52 21.28 10:13:35.246 -20:37:42.73 AT 2026xfm 2026-01-27.58 21 21:57:25.287 +03:48:20.98 AT 2026xfl 2026-07-16.55 21.68 14:26:07.382 +33:39:52.18 AT 2026xfk 2026-06-13.34 20.9 02:09:31.559 -03:10:04.80 AT 2026xfj 2026-01-17.24 21.98 20:17:01.562 -20:06:27.94 AT 2026xfi 2026-05-20.56 20.93 21:08:09.912 -21:12:24.85 AT 2026xfh 2026-06-19.58 20.9 20:08:20.135 -25:53:36.34 AT 2026xfg 2026-07-19.45 20.74 14:51:25.078 +41:07:07.07 AT 2026xff 2026-06-13.34 21.62 22:33:15.210 +12:04:33.49 AT 2026xfe 2026-06-21.53 20.23 13:52:05.795 +29:21:47.19 AT 2026xfd 2026-04-24.32 20.92 13:30:27.613 +10:38:39.93 AT 2026xfc 2026-04-20.32 21.07 13:40:18.442 +39:30:10.71 AT 2026xfb 2026-05-24.29 20.6 20:02:32.611 -29:31:03.47 AT 2026xfa 2026-06-16.52 19.85 21:35:00.881 +03:50:25.49 AT 2026xez 2026-07-16.55 21.5 08:33:56.550 +06:59:43.01 AT 2026xey 2026-01-24.36 22.17 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 22 03:58 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 101 C - WARNING