This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3030 2461274.8030 9.31 19:48:16.34 -07:59:09.3
32.16751 -16.24119 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.3 Juno 0 -0 0 9.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:48:16.34 -07:59:09.3: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:48:16.34 -07:59:09.3: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461274.8030,9.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260822.3030 9.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3030 2461274.8030 13.52 19:40:48.70 -08:10:17.2
31.15415 -14.66302 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.313 Chaldaea -1 1 1 13.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:40:48.70 -08:10:17.2: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:40:48.70 -08:10:17.2: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461274.8030,13.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260822.3030 13.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3030 2461274.8030 12.73 19:38:03.47 -07:52:54.9
31.11353 -13.92342 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" NSVS J1938032-075254
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.121 R1 Y 0.470 R1 301.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:38:03.47 -07:52:54.9: 13.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:38:03.47 -07:52:54.9: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J1938032-075254,2461274.8030,12.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J1938032-075254 20260822.3030 12.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3030 2461274.8030 11.54 19:40:31.08 -08:45:22.8
30.57742 -14.85363 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J194031-0845.4
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.430 V Y 0.720 V 2452916.27700 335.545441000000 M7/8
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:40:31.08 -08:45:22.8: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:40:31.08 -08:45:22.8: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J194031-0845.4,2461274.8030,11.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J194031-0845.4 20260822.3030 11.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3030 2461274.8030 11.52 19:32:16.23 -05:55:11.6
32.26408 -11.76604 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 7.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J193216-0555.1
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.290 V Y 0.660 V 2452131.90000 89.285713000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:32:16.23 -05:55:11.6: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:32:16.23 -05:55:11.6: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J193216-0555.1,2461274.8030,11.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J193216-0555.1 20260822.3030 11.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461234.76742150 13.07.2026 06:24:55.218 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
First image: 2461234.76742150 13.07.2026 06:24:55.218 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Last image: 2461274.80335199 22.08.2026 07:16:39.612 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 23
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.80
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15749
Objects passed selection criteria: 15704
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12068.8
Average stars matched: 11097 (91.9482 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 239836 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 20 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-192-g23359006
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-20)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 22 02:21:57 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461234.76742150 13.07.2026 06:24:55.218 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
First image: 2461234.76742150 13.07.2026 06:24:55.218 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Last image: 2461274.80335199 22.08.2026 07:16:39.612 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 168
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 93 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 141087
Objects passed selection criteria: 140729
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 110681
Average stars matched: 101456 (91.6657 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 521420 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 20 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-192-g23359006
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-20)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 22 02:24:37 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461274.80265488
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:53.770 -09:59:26.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:52.455 -09:59:47.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:42:53.770 -09:59:26.45
Second-epoch image center 19:42:52.455 -09:59:47.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0080 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:49.867 -09:59:34.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:42:53.770 -09:59:26.45
Second-epoch image center 19:42:49.867 -09:59:34.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0162 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:42:52.455 -09:59:47.69
Second-epoch second image center 19:42:49.867 -09:59:34.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01126 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wb6d1DCQAR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits &> /tmp/tmp.unHvbRQOUJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qJ87RPHkn4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yHksZ0hrXf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 17193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6609 to 303.8040 deg, Dec -15.2497 to -4.6824 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6609 to 303.8040 deg, Dec -15.2497 to -4.6824 deg
Loaded 11410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9135 out of 9587 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9587 out of 17193 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.678300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.678300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.80
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.88
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.88
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 17193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6609 to 303.8040 deg, Dec -15.2497 to -4.6824 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6609 to 303.8040 deg, Dec -15.2497 to -4.6824 deg
Loaded 11410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9135 out of 9587 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9587 out of 17193 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 17184 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6555 to 303.8043 deg, Dec -15.2619 to -4.6821 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6555 to 303.8043 deg, Dec -15.2619 to -4.6821 deg
Loaded 11423 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9132 out of 9602 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9602 out of 17184 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 22 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
2.3 pix Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
14.9 mag. Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.wb6d1DCQAR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1083, bad_region=3020, passed=17193
Got 17193 stars (including 13227 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17193 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4888 stars left (next iteration limit 5375)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits N_match=4888 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.441 n_q1=1847 n_q2=720 n_q3=1530 n_q4=791 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.123
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits -region wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.unHvbRQOUJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1110, bad_region=3013, passed=17184
Got 17184 stars (including 13206 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17184 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4884 stars left (next iteration limit 5373)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits N_match=4884 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.589 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.456 n_q1=1832 n_q2=720 n_q3=1528 n_q4=804 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.157
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits -region wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qJ87RPHkn4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=675, bad_region=3567, passed=13648
Got 13648 stars (including 9568 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13648 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=6.521 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.197 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.434 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.485 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.404 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.486 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4881 robust_rms_before=0.700 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.429 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.434 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.551 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.485
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:52.451 -09:59:48.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 13648 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1428352.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 3, robust RMS 0.700 -> 0.434 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.463 n_q1=1636 n_q2=920 n_q3=1367 n_q4=958 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.154
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yHksZ0hrXf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=659, bad_region=3485, passed=13635
Got 13635 stars (including 9636 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13635 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4878 stars left (next iteration limit 5365)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=6.629 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.407 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=0.470 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.503 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=0.421 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.487 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4878 robust_rms_before=0.713 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.431 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.470 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.569 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.503
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:49.869 -09:59:34.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 13635 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1428388.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 3, robust RMS 0.713 -> 0.470 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits N_match=4878 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.457 n_q1=1644 n_q2=917 n_q3=1370 n_q4=947 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.037
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits sigma_overall=0.499 worst_q_ratio=1.123
ref2=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits sigma_overall=0.509 worst_q_ratio=1.157
new1=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits sigma_overall=0.438 worst_q_ratio=1.154
new2=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits sigma_overall=0.489 worst_q_ratio=1.037
reference average sigma_overall=0.504 worst_q_ratio=1.14
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042_astrometric_residuals.png (4888 matched stars from wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043_astrometric_residuals.png (4884 matched stars from wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006_astrometric_residuals.png (4881 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007_astrometric_residuals.png (4878 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:24:51.14 -08:05:21.4: 11.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:29:59.40 -12:52:54.4: 11.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:48:16.34 -07:59:09.3: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:40:31.08 -08:45:22.6: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:49:13.54 -06:18:50.8: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:41:08.20 -10:04:44.3: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:45:23.26 -09:52:17.0: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:47:51.05 -06:44:14.8: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:30:47.08 -08:24:49.1: 12.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:29:59.40 -12:52:54.4: 11.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:48:16.34 -07:59:09.3: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:24:51.14 -08:05:21.4: 11.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:40:31.08 -08:45:22.6: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:29:59.40 -12:52:54.4: ref_mag=11.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7136 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:24:51.14 -08:05:21.4: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7472 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:40:31.08 -08:45:22.6: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3790 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:55:30.34 -08:06:15.4: 12.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:49:13.54 -06:18:50.8: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:47:51.05 -06:44:14.8: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:51.05 -06:44:14.8: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0141 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:49:13.54 -06:18:50.8: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9168 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:41:08.20 -10:04:44.3: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:45:23.26 -09:52:17.0: 12.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:30:47.08 -08:24:49.1: 12.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:08.20 -10:04:44.3: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7895 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:23.26 -09:52:17.0: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9606 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:30:47.08 -08:24:49.1: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9143 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:55:30.34 -08:06:15.4: 12.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.08 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:30.34 -08:06:15.4: ref_mag=12.08 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0600 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:25:57.02 -10:17:49.6: 12.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:37:54.63 -06:27:13.1: 12.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:35:13.72 -07:43:15.6: 12.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:25:57.02 -10:17:49.6: 12.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:25:57.02 -10:17:49.6: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9183 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:37:54.63 -06:27:13.1: 12.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:35:13.72 -07:43:15.6: 12.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:35:13.72 -07:43:15.6: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0360 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:37:54.63 -06:27:13.1: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0758 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out22349.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21242.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21100_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 21100_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21101_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 21101_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:37.98 -08:14:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21242_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 21242_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22103_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 22103_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:40.04 -07:34:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22207_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 22207_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:33.16 -11:37:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22319_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 22319_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:48:18.59 -06:26:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22341_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 22341_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:11.16 -06:34:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22349_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 22349_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:31.08 -08:45:22.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.492 4194664897514228096 295.12930572699 -08.75591050953 9.4200 7.9069 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.492#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22397_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 22397_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:00:49.82 -09:50:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22997_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 22997_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23000_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 23000_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23115_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 23115_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23175_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 23175_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:45:45.07 -06:13:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23227_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 23227_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23274_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 23274_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23285_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 23285_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23356_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 23356_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23419_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 23419_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23430_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 23430_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:29:10.73 -11:16:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23448_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 23448_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23480_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 23480_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12786_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 12786_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:06.16 -07:36:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 16s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aql-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
19:48:16.34 -07:59:09.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:53.770 -09:59:26.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:52.451 -09:59:48.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:42:53.770 -09:59:26.45
Second-epoch image center 19:42:52.451 -09:59:48.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0081 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:49.869 -09:59:34.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:42:53.770 -09:59:26.45
Second-epoch image center 19:42:49.869 -09:59:34.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0162 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:42:52.451 -09:59:48.07
Second-epoch second image center 19:42:49.869 -09:59:34.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01124 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8h9WLR6NnL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9m2WJFVNOJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yEQhfOg8Fo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3Ms1BfIETY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 151351 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6570 to 303.8111 deg, Dec -15.2567 to -4.6708 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6570 to 303.8111 deg, Dec -15.2567 to -4.6708 deg
Loaded 11427 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8227 out of 10219 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10219 out of 151351 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.506000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.506000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.01
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.01
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 151351 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6570 to 303.8111 deg, Dec -15.2567 to -4.6708 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6570 to 303.8111 deg, Dec -15.2567 to -4.6708 deg
Loaded 11427 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8227 out of 10219 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10219 out of 151351 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 152274 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6475 to 303.8112 deg, Dec -15.2629 to -4.6821 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6475 to 303.8112 deg, Dec -15.2629 to -4.6821 deg
Loaded 11432 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8206 out of 10213 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10213 out of 152274 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 97 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
2.1 pix Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
15.0 mag. Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.8h9WLR6NnL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=14347, bad_region=18370, passed=151324
Got 151324 stars (including 119849 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 137711 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 137711 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 137711 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.553 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.444 n_q1=1844 n_q2=722 n_q3=1500 n_q4=843 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.151
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits -region wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9m2WJFVNOJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=14548, bad_region=18412, passed=152258
Got 152258 stars (including 120598 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 152258 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 138572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 138572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 138572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4903 stars left (next iteration limit 5394)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits N_match=4903 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.464 n_q1=1840 n_q2=734 n_q3=1493 n_q4=836 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.148
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits -region wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yEQhfOg8Fo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=9255, bad_region=20804, passed=110683
Got 110683 stars (including 83207 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 110683 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95366 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95366 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95366 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5391)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4900 robust_rms=6.512 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.739 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4900 robust_rms=0.433 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.477 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4900 robust_rms=0.406 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.488 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4900 robust_rms_before=0.432 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.420 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.433 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.481 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.477
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.481 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.443 n_q1=1700 n_q2=849 n_q3=1420 n_q4=931 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.236
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3Ms1BfIETY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=9032, bad_region=20416, passed=109110
Got 109110 stars (including 82149 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 109110 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 94073 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 94073 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 94073 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4901 stars left (next iteration limit 5391)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4901 robust_rms=6.506 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.836 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4901 robust_rms=0.473 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.490 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4901 robust_rms=0.425 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.483 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4901 robust_rms_before=0.476 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.416 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.473 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.501 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.490
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.501 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits N_match=4901 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.428 n_q1=1688 n_q2=852 n_q3=1435 n_q4=926 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.190
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-15-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_021716_TTUQ2b1x1_409151_YlnVbXTF/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:58:34.62 -11:37:04.3: 14.13 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:55:27.99 -11:22:54.4: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:39:27.44 -08:43:23.5: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 20:01:11.79 -12:45:02.2: 14.36 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:55:11.68 -06:58:51.1: 14.14 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:56:47.79 -13:20:05.2: 14.37 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:53:41.83 -12:38:01.4: 14.28 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:44:42.60 -13:50:06.9: 14.37 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:48:39.05 -09:00:59.3: 14.22 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:31:08.90 -11:53:28.9: 13.69 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:56:47.79 -13:20:05.2: 14.33 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:48:39.05 -09:00:59.3: 14.31 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:39:27.44 -08:43:23.5: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:58:34.62 -11:37:04.3: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:53:41.83 -12:38:01.4: 14.07 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 20:01:11.79 -12:45:02.2: 14.27 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:34.62 -11:37:04.3: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2634 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:47.79 -13:20:05.2: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3768 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:39:27.44 -08:43:23.5: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0244 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:41.83 -12:38:01.4: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2759 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:48:39.05 -09:00:59.3: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4322 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:11.79 -12:45:02.2: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3057 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:55:11.68 -06:58:51.1: 14.17 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:11.68 -06:58:51.1: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4767 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:55:27.99 -11:22:54.4: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:44:42.60 -13:50:06.9: 14.38 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:27.99 -11:22:54.4: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1591 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:44:42.60 -13:50:06.9: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3442 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:31:08.90 -11:53:28.9: 13.70 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:31:08.90 -11:53:28.9: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8116 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:47:13.17 -06:41:34.3: 14.53 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:47:28.83 -12:00:44.5: 14.07 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:55:37.00 -13:44:01.8: 14.00 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:53:35.46 -12:26:38.4: 14.32 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:42:33.54 -07:02:13.8: 13.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:54:15.85 -13:55:00.6: 14.51 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:56:24.33 -13:51:47.9: 14.19 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:47:13.17 -06:41:34.3: 14.72 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:55:37.00 -13:44:01.8: 14.17 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:13.17 -06:41:34.3: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2433 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:56:24.33 -13:51:47.9: 14.04 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:37.00 -13:44:01.8: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2000 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:47:28.83 -12:00:44.5: 14.00 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:53:35.46 -12:26:38.4: 14.28 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:24.33 -13:51:47.9: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0800 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:42:33.54 -07:02:13.8: 13.93 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:28.83 -12:00:44.5: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2068 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:58:43.33 -11:07:52.1: 13.93 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:35.46 -12:26:38.4: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1465 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:42:33.54 -07:02:13.8: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9634 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:50:48.52 -12:48:26.8: 14.05 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:54:15.85 -13:55:00.6: 14.44 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:15.85 -13:55:00.6: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3276 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:34:50.32 -14:08:48.3: 13.49 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:50:48.52 -12:48:26.8: 14.00 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:58:43.33 -11:07:52.1: 13.87 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:50:48.52 -12:48:26.8: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9902 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:43.33 -11:07:52.1: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9862 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:34:50.32 -14:08:48.3: 13.57 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:34:50.32 -14:08:48.3: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6909 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:55:00.06 -13:07:43.1: 13.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:38:03.36 -14:08:55.8: 13.35 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 20:01:00.05 -09:22:49.1: 13.40 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:57:36.58 -12:19:33.6: 13.67 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:56:33.96 -11:39:29.5: 13.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:55:06.26 -13:54:52.7: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:55:58.77 -14:02:34.6: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:38:03.36 -14:08:55.8: 13.36 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:03.36 -14:08:55.8: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4775 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:55:00.06 -13:07:43.1: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:54:46.46 -06:36:01.6: 12.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 20:01:00.05 -09:22:49.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:57:36.58 -12:19:33.6: 13.66 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:00.06 -13:07:43.1: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7112 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:00.05 -09:22:49.1: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5328 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:57:36.58 -12:19:33.6: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8042 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:56:33.96 -11:39:29.5: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:55:06.26 -13:54:52.7: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:33.96 -11:39:29.5: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5119 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:06.26 -13:54:52.7: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4574 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:55:58.77 -14:02:34.6: 13.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:58.77 -14:02:34.6: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4921 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:54:46.46 -06:36:01.6: 12.79 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:46.46 -06:36:01.6: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9981 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:37:48.11 -13:58:30.3: 13.63 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:40:48.70 -08:10:17.2: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:58:51.92 -13:20:37.6: 14.04 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 20:00:50.18 -14:07:24.8: 14.27 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:40:16.17 -13:28:58.0: 13.82 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 20:00:42.90 -10:35:19.8: 13.85 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:55:33.76 -14:06:41.7: 14.03 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:45:01.08 -07:43:32.0: 14.06 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:51:24.32 -09:31:09.1: 14.10 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:37:48.11 -13:58:30.3: 13.52 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:37:48.11 -13:58:30.3: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5386 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:40:48.70 -08:10:17.2: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:58:51.92 -13:20:37.6: 14.14 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:32:09.12 -11:17:55.9: 13.78 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:51.92 -13:20:37.6: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0336 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:40:16.17 -13:28:58.0: 13.96 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 20:00:42.90 -10:35:19.8: 13.68 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:55:33.76 -14:06:41.7: 14.09 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:16.17 -13:28:58.0: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8444 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 20:00:50.18 -14:07:24.8: 14.33 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:00:42.90 -10:35:19.8: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9365 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:00:50.18 -14:07:24.8: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1535 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:33.76 -14:06:41.7: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9703 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:45:01.08 -07:43:32.0: 14.17 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:51:24.32 -09:31:09.1: 14.07 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:01.08 -07:43:32.0: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1922 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:24.32 -09:31:09.1: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.9978 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:32:09.12 -11:17:55.9: 13.89 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:32:09.12 -11:17:55.9: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9359 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:54:56.22 -12:26:48.2: 14.39 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:35:12.32 -06:31:23.4: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:59:45.93 -14:11:46.0: 14.64 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:47:44.81 -13:36:06.3: 14.81 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:52:56.56 -05:42:17.6: 14.54 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:59:00.61 -14:04:30.3: 14.49 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:46:41.39 -05:54:14.6: 14.19 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:54:56.22 -12:26:48.2: 14.23 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:56.22 -12:26:48.2: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3635 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:35:12.32 -06:31:23.4: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 20:01:06.14 -13:24:11.7: 14.69 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:59:15.48 -13:47:30.5: 14.84 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:47:44.81 -13:36:06.3: 14.95 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:59:45.93 -14:11:46.0: 14.74 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:44.81 -13:36:06.3: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3331 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:59:45.93 -14:11:46.0: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3460 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:46:41.39 -05:54:14.6: 14.13 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:52:56.56 -05:42:17.6: 14.59 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:59:00.61 -14:04:30.3: 14.63 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:41.39 -05:54:14.6: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1692 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:56.56 -05:42:17.6: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2615 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:59:00.61 -14:04:30.3: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4007 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 20:01:06.14 -13:24:11.7: 14.85 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:06.14 -13:24:11.7: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4980 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:59:15.48 -13:47:30.5: 14.36 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:59:15.48 -13:47:30.5: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4643 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:59:05.51 -13:09:15.0: 14.50 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:50:06.91 -12:29:29.0: 14.41 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:54:44.93 -13:31:06.9: 14.70 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:59:07.53 -13:43:57.6: 14.74 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:56:41.86 -13:40:31.2: 14.61 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:56:02.90 -13:41:05.7: 14.67 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:59:05.51 -13:09:15.0: 14.57 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:59:05.51 -13:09:15.0: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4434 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:40:06.08 -07:19:15.9: 14.68 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:53:23.92 -14:00:53.2: 14.95 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:50:06.91 -12:29:29.0: 14.39 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:50:06.91 -12:29:29.0: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2369 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:54:44.93 -13:31:06.9: 14.48 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:44.93 -13:31:06.9: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3794 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:59:07.53 -13:43:57.6: 14.45 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:56:41.86 -13:40:31.2: 14.70 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:59:07.53 -13:43:57.6: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5164 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:41.86 -13:40:31.2: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4491 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:56:02.90 -13:41:05.7: 14.88 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:02.90 -13:41:05.7: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5521 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:40:06.08 -07:19:15.9: 14.41 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:06.08 -07:19:15.9: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2818 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:53:23.92 -14:00:53.2: 14.83 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:23.92 -14:00:53.2: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5398 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:45:40.95 -12:07:24.3: 14.63 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:56:58.81 -12:42:03.5: 14.82 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:49:28.97 -14:01:36.9: 14.41 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:53:39.92 -09:40:17.7: 14.97 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:50:52.77 -09:49:10.4: 14.84 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:54:41.67 -13:16:03.5: 14.63 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:45:40.95 -12:07:24.3: 14.88 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:41:11.47 -11:08:44.5: 14.41 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:40.95 -12:07:24.3: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5234 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:41:37.79 -11:03:41.4: 14.66 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:56:58.81 -12:42:03.5: 15.06 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:58.81 -12:42:03.5: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4990 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:49:28.97 -14:01:36.9: 14.50 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:50:52.77 -09:49:10.4: 14.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:49:28.97 -14:01:36.9: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3676 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:53:39.92 -09:40:17.7: 14.66 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:50:52.77 -09:49:10.4: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6178 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:39.92 -09:40:17.7: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5664 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:54:41.67 -13:16:03.5: 14.87 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:41:11.47 -11:08:44.5: 14.40 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:41.67 -13:16:03.5: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4752 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:11.47 -11:08:44.5: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4019 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:41:37.79 -11:03:41.4: 14.90 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:37.79 -11:03:41.4: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5476 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:41:02.23 -08:15:12.8: 14.57 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:33:56.71 -07:01:15.3: 14.73 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:28:14.69 -07:36:53.1: 14.57 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:41:02.23 -08:15:12.8: 14.85 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:02.23 -08:15:12.8: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5830 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:38:03.47 -07:52:54.9: 13.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:33:56.71 -07:01:15.3: 14.93 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:33:56.71 -07:01:15.3: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5115 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:28:14.69 -07:36:53.1: 14.86 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:28:14.69 -07:36:53.1: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4636 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:38:03.47 -07:52:54.9: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:38:03.47 -07:52:54.9: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7273 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 20:01:20.66 -14:03:00.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:40:31.08 -08:45:22.8: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:32:16.23 -05:55:11.6: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 20:01:20.66 -14:03:00.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:20.66 -14:03:00.4: the position falls in a bad CCD region (bad_region.lst) on all measured reference images -- cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:40:31.08 -08:45:22.8: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:40:31.08 -08:45:22.8: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5342 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:32:16.23 -05:55:11.6: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:32:16.23 -05:55:11.6: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5171 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out190541.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out115928.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out141437.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out185380.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91389.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 17s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175238_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175238_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175250_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175250_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175253_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175253_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175255_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175255_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175264_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175264_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:46:19.36 -12:51:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175267_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175267_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175268_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175268_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175269_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175269_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175274_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175274_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175279_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175279_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175289_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175289_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175292_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175292_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175299_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175299_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175304_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175304_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175308_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175308_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175313_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175313_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175321_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175321_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175322_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175322_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:43.16 -05:55:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175325_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175325_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175328_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175328_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175332_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175332_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:20.09 -06:17:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175333_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175333_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175336_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175336_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175337_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175337_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175338_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175338_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:41:35.69 -12:51:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175353_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175353_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175354_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175354_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175355_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175355_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175363_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175363_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175366_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175366_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175368_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175368_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175369_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175369_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175373_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175373_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175378_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175378_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:13.50 -12:14:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175380_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175380_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:45:35.83 -13:25:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175382_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175382_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:38.01 -08:14:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175519_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 175519_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:48:16.37 -07:59:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176609_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 176609_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:40.00 -07:34:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180086_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 180086_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:25.82 -14:06:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180347_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 180347_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:00:20.96 -08:57:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181504_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 181504_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:29:28.42 -07:03:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181926_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 181926_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:45:47.43 -08:00:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183070_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 183070_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:55.61 -14:08:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184350_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 184350_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:55:27.28 -12:29:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184671_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 184671_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185380_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 185380_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186460_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 186460_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:52:37.96 -13:18:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186967_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 186967_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187315_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 187315_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187753_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 187753_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187786_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 187786_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188133_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 188133_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188588_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 188588_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190078_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 190078_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190235_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 190235_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190435_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 190435_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190541_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 190541_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:35:12.32 -06:31:23.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.10, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.08)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.598 4207430712843767424 293.80071954424 -06.52237475004 12.9382 10.6088 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.598#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190728_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 190728_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:55.83 -05:48:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190748_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 190748_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190890_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 190890_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190991_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 190991_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191091_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 191091_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191192_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 191192_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191337_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 191337_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191380_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 191380_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191697_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 191697_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191914_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 191914_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192180_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 192180_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192420_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 192420_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192451_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 192451_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192484_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 192484_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192526_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 192526_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192590_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 192590_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192789_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 192789_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192850_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 192850_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192952_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 192952_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193259_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 193259_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193309_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 193309_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193488_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 193488_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193585_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 193585_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194052_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 194052_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194178_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 194178_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194583_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 194583_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195007_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 195007_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141437_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 141437_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125795_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 125795_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:11.17 -06:34:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123905_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 123905_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:48:18.59 -06:26:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44863_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 44863_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:33.19 -11:37:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89789_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 89789_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:35:45.80 -08:48:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164855_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 164855_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:12.51 -07:34:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12155_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 12155_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33784_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 33784_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:39.61 -12:24:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72531_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 72531_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:00:49.81 -09:50:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91389_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 91389_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115928_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 115928_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71074_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 71074_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:38:32.81 -09:57:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101359_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 101359_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_02-16-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
