This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3003 2461274.8003 12.49 18:28:50.84 -03:46:34.5
26.98762 3.28845 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.57 Mnemosyne 0 0 0 12.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits at 18:28:50.84 -03:46:34.5: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits at 18:28:50.84 -03:46:34.5: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3003* 18 28 50.84 -03 46 34.5 12.5 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461274.8003,12.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260822.3003 12.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3003 2461274.8003 13.58 18:26:37.28 +01:39:18.7
31.57427 6.27571 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 9.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.480 Hansa -0 0 0 12.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits at 18:26:37.28 +01:39:18.7: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits at 18:26:37.28 +01:39:18.7: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3003* 18 26 37.28 +01 39 18.7 13.6 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461274.8003,13.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260822.3003 13.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461203.80333762 12.06.2026 07:16:38.370 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits
First image: 2461203.80333762 12.06.2026 07:16:38.370 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits
Last image: 2461274.80071358 22.08.2026 07:12:51.653 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9555
Objects passed selection criteria: 9545
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8018
Average stars matched: 7790.25 (97.1595 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 236088 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 20 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-192-g23359006
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-20)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 22 02:14:50 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461203.80333762 12.06.2026 07:16:38.370 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits
First image: 2461203.80333762 12.06.2026 07:16:38.370 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits
Last image: 2461274.80071358 22.08.2026 07:12:51.653 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 82
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 46 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 97215
Objects passed selection criteria: 97031
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 83606
Average stars matched: 78009.5 (93.3061 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 563160 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 20 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-192-g23359006
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-20)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 22 02:16:16 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461274.79990207
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:00.065 -01:59:36.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:17.358 -01:58:55.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:00:00.065 -01:59:36.88
Second-epoch image center 18:00:17.358 -01:58:55.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0729 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:20.017 -01:58:16.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:00:00.065 -01:59:36.88
Second-epoch image center 18:00:20.017 -01:58:16.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0861 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:00:17.358 -01:58:55.03
Second-epoch second image center 18:00:20.017 -01:58:16.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01545 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits &> /tmp/tmp.f8VJDjHy2W
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YQi0iJP2D0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2atBFbQ3HW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kYHZLvbHoS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11030 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 262.1504 to 277.8775 deg, Dec -7.2481 to +3.2697 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 262.1504 to 277.8775 deg, Dec -7.2481 to 3.2697 deg
Loaded 5283 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4347 out of 4595 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4595 out of 11030 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.741300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.741300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.02
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.02
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11030 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 262.1504 to 277.8775 deg, Dec -7.2481 to +3.2697 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 262.1504 to 277.8775 deg, Dec -7.2481 to 3.2697 deg
Loaded 5283 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4347 out of 4595 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4595 out of 11030 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 10215 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.8150 to 278.1791 deg, Dec -7.6580 to +3.7113 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.8150 to 278.1791 deg, Dec -7.6580 to 3.7113 deg
Loaded 6202 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4343 out of 4626 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4626 out of 10215 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits
2.1 pix Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
2.2 pix fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
2.2 pix fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits
15.1 mag. Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.f8VJDjHy2W (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=756, bad_region=0, passed=11030
Got 11030 stars (including 10260 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11030 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4761 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4680 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4681 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4680 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11030 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4759 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4679 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11030 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4679 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11030 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 4679 stars left (next iteration limit 5148)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits N_match=4679 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.572 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.999 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.616 n_q1=925 n_q2=700 n_q3=1524 n_q4=1530 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.746
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits -region wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YQi0iJP2D0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=771, bad_region=0, passed=10215
Got 10215 stars (including 9433 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10215 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4753 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4673 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4674 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4673 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4753 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4673 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4673 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4673 stars left (next iteration limit 5140)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits N_match=4673 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.426 n_q1=1400 n_q2=1649 n_q3=683 n_q4=941 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits -region wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2atBFbQ3HW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=297, bad_region=0, passed=5636
Got 5636 stars (including 5332 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5636 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4749 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4661 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4664 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4661 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5635 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4749 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4663 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5635 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4663 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5635 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4663 stars left (next iteration limit 5127)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4663 robust_rms=8.225 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=19.474 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4663 robust_rms=0.591 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.727 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4663 robust_rms=0.461 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.528 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4663 robust_rms_before=0.903 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.512 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.461 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.645 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.528
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Image size: 942.1'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:17.331 -01:58:55.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5636 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky68061.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.903 -> 0.461 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits N_match=4663 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.550 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.567 n_q1=1446 n_q2=1668 n_q3=773 n_q4=776 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.154
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kYHZLvbHoS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=281, bad_region=0, passed=5405
Got 5405 stars (including 5111 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5405 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4745 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4659 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4659 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4746 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4663 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4663 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4663 stars left (next iteration limit 5124)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4663 robust_rms=7.791 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=22.563 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4663 robust_rms=0.560 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.652 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4663 robust_rms=0.463 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.515 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4663 robust_rms_before=0.852 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.504 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.463 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.624 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.515
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Image size: 942.1'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:19.990 -01:58:16.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5405 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky67865.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.852 -> 0.463 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits N_match=4663 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.556 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.531 n_q1=1360 n_q2=1708 n_q3=803 n_q4=792 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits sigma_overall=0.572 worst_q_ratio=1.746
ref2=Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits sigma_overall=0.482 worst_q_ratio=1.100
new1=fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits sigma_overall=0.491 worst_q_ratio=1.154
new2=fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits sigma_overall=0.494 worst_q_ratio=1.125
reference average sigma_overall=0.527 worst_q_ratio=1.423
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096_astrometric_residuals.png (4679 matched stars from wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.52 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017_astrometric_residuals.png (4673 matched stars from wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002_astrometric_residuals.png (4663 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003_astrometric_residuals.png (4663 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20884_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 20884_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:55.30 -00:38:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20896_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 20896_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:08.82 +00:29:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20898_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 20898_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:26.53 -01:00:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20130_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 20130_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:10.14 -03:22:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 0s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ser-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:00.065 -01:59:36.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Image size: 942.1'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:17.331 -01:58:55.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:00:00.065 -01:59:36.88
Second-epoch image center 18:00:17.331 -01:58:55.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0728 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Image size: 942.1'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:19.990 -01:58:16.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:00:00.065 -01:59:36.88
Second-epoch image center 18:00:19.990 -01:58:16.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0859 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:00:17.331 -01:58:55.69
Second-epoch second image center 18:00:19.990 -01:58:16.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01546 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0lB87VqRN4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ogmRWxSAEn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sxnM5NRSoM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kPkAN07eWw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 105794 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 262.1419 to 277.8811 deg, Dec -7.2602 to +3.2747 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 262.1419 to 277.8811 deg, Dec -7.2602 to 3.2747 deg
Loaded 5296 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3819 out of 4671 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4671 out of 105794 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.569500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.569500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 105794 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 262.1419 to 277.8811 deg, Dec -7.2602 to +3.2747 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 262.1419 to 277.8811 deg, Dec -7.2602 to 3.2747 deg
Loaded 5296 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3819 out of 4671 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4671 out of 105794 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 116538 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.7978 to 278.1790 deg, Dec -7.6928 to +3.7326 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.7978 to 278.1790 deg, Dec -7.6928 to 3.7326 deg
Loaded 6249 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3788 out of 4753 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4753 out of 116538 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits (aperture=4.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 68 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits
1.8 pix Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
2.1 pix fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
2.1 pix fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits
15.3 mag. Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.0lB87VqRN4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=9238, bad_region=0, passed=105784
Got 105784 stars (including 96385 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 105784 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4743 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4680 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4682 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4680 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 105784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4743 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4678 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 105784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4678 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 105784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4678 stars left (next iteration limit 5148)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits N_match=4678 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.950 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.573 n_q1=967 n_q2=711 n_q3=1500 n_q4=1500 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.701
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits -region wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ogmRWxSAEn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=46, blended=10306, bad_region=38, passed=116492
Got 116492 stars (including 105935 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 116492 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4742 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4681 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4681 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4681 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 116492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4742 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4681 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 116492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4681 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 116492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 4681 stars left (next iteration limit 5149)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits N_match=4681 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.430 n_q1=1354 n_q2=1623 n_q3=731 n_q4=973 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.111
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits -region wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sxnM5NRSoM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=2701, bad_region=13, passed=57979
Got 57979 stars (including 55171 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57979 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4743 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4665 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4664 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4665 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4743 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4667 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4666 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4666 stars left (next iteration limit 5131)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4666 robust_rms=8.243 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.928 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4666 robust_rms=0.588 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.739 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4666 robust_rms=0.459 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.524 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4666 robust_rms_before=0.462 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.487 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.459 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.524 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.524
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.524 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits N_match=4666 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.548 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.539 n_q1=1461 n_q2=1646 n_q3=792 n_q4=767 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.098
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kPkAN07eWw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=2561, bad_region=16, passed=56710
Got 56710 stars (including 54030 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56710 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4743 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4670 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4671 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4670 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56705 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4743 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4672 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56705 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4672 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56705 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4672 stars left (next iteration limit 5137)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4672 robust_rms=7.573 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=18.618 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4672 robust_rms=0.553 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.647 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4672 robust_rms=0.458 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.512 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4672 robust_rms_before=0.459 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.481 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.458 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.513 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.512
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.513 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits N_match=4672 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.537 n_q1=1421 n_q2=1676 n_q3=816 n_q4=759 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.118
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-11-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_021330_TTUQ1b1x1_21209_Blo6tGjw/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits at 18:01:51.78 +02:40:01.3: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits at 18:28:50.84 -03:46:34.5: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits at 17:38:34.92 +01:12:54.5: 13.49 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits at 18:03:27.31 +02:14:44.4: 13.95 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits at 18:08:07.14 +02:35:34.2: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits at 18:28:50.84 -03:46:34.5: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits at 18:03:27.31 +02:14:44.4: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits at 17:38:34.92 +01:12:54.5: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits at 18:01:51.78 +02:40:01.3: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:38:34.92 +01:12:54.5: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5195 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:03:27.31 +02:14:44.4: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7244 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:01:51.78 +02:40:01.3: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2077 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits at 18:08:07.14 +02:35:34.2: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:08:07.14 +02:35:34.2: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4900 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits at 18:26:37.28 +01:39:18.7: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits at 17:40:00.78 -00:39:18.4: 13.39 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits at 18:26:37.28 +01:39:18.7: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits at 17:49:10.70 +01:11:25.4: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits at 17:40:00.78 -00:39:18.4: 13.55 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:40:00.78 -00:39:18.4: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3673 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits at 17:38:55.49 +02:38:36.2: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits at 17:49:10.70 +01:11:25.4: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:49:10.70 +01:11:25.4: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5583 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits at 17:38:55.49 +02:38:36.2: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:38:55.49 +02:38:36.2: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3796 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits at 17:58:38.04 -00:36:03.3: 13.65 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits at 17:58:38.04 -00:36:03.3: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:58:38.04 -00:36:03.3: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7146 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits at 18:10:11.07 -03:28:59.3: 14.72 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits at 18:10:11.07 -03:28:59.3: 14.46 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:10:11.07 -03:28:59.3: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3811 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-16-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0096.fits at 18:23:17.48 -04:57:12.2: 14.53 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-59-42_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits at 18:23:17.48 -04:57:12.2: 14.43 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:23:17.48 -04:57:12.2: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5089 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out14428.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out137552.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out137655.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137472_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137472_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137473_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137473_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137477_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137477_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:58.15 +02:49:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137489_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137489_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137491_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137491_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:13.84 +02:40:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137493_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137493_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:21.23 +00:27:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137509_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137509_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:17.80 +02:29:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137515_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137515_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:59.95 +02:49:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137546_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137546_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:33.47 +02:31:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137552_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 137552_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137555_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137555_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137563_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137563_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:55.62 +01:10:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137566_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137566_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:28.38 +00:01:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137569_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137569_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:38.34 +02:36:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137573_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137573_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:10:19.27 +02:36:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137574_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137574_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:58.21 +02:13:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137576_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137576_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:06.36 -02:32:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137590_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137590_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:10.53 +00:04:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137594_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137594_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:24:54.79 -05:39:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137597_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137597_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:38.40 +00:52:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137620_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137620_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:52.54 +02:58:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137635_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137635_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:14.21 +02:32:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137646_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137646_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:05.49 -01:14:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137648_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137648_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:06:59.50 +00:03:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137655_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 137655_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137660_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137660_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:25.63 +02:27:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137662_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137662_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:40.79 -05:16:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137670_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137670_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137673_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137673_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:17.70 -00:00:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137685_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137685_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:31.95 -06:32:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137691_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137691_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:11:36.29 -05:33:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137692_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137692_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:26.13 +03:06:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137693_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137693_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:13.61 -01:28:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137695_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137695_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:21.35 +00:24:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137696_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137696_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137707_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137707_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:08.77 +02:08:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137709_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137709_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:25:02.06 -06:50:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137713_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137713_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:10:26.74 +00:33:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137719_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137719_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137729_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137729_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:03.31 -02:13:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137733_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137733_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:12:55.78 -00:40:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137734_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137734_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:35.59 -03:55:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137740_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137740_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:45:02.59 -05:12:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137743_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137743_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:13:36.07 +00:27:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137744_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137744_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:39.43 -00:13:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137755_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137755_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137763_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137763_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:39.64 -05:17:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137770_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137770_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:41.21 -04:41:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137819_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137819_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:21.75 -06:18:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137826_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137826_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:17.85 -00:18:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137834_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137834_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:21.68 -00:39:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137864_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 137864_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121480_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 121480_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:24.26 +02:41:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123418_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 123418_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:58.88 -03:58:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123716_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 123716_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:07.58 -07:02:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60637_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 60637_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:23.25 +02:23:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15646_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 15646_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:06.19 -04:47:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50852_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 50852_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:44.38 -00:35:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123815_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 123815_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:37.95 -01:32:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122754_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 122754_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:36.09 -06:16:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122713_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 122713_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:14.75 -04:20:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122667_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 122667_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:07:06.73 +00:02:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122281_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 122281_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:06:35.66 -03:22:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119798_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 119798_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:08.82 +00:29:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14428_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 14428_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:17.48 -04:57:12.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.51, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.49)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.674 4161308158600054528 275.82309582618 -04.95183462964 13.2261 10.6192 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.674#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05137_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 05137_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:33.36 -06:24:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50440_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 50440_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:55.32 -00:38:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62119_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 62119_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_02-12-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks