This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
U Gem,2461271.9457,10.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
U Gem 20260819.4457 10.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.4457 2461271.9457 13.89 07:17:22.11 +20:05:07.7
197.51760 14.53463 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.50 Virginia -0 0 0 14.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:17:22.11 +20:05:07.7: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:17:22.11 +20:05:07.7: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.9457,13.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.4457 13.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.4457 2461271.9457 12.95 07:16:43.70 +22:22:38.0
195.28439 15.32091 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.521 Brixia 0 0 0 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:16:43.70 +22:22:38.0: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:16:43.70 +22:22:38.0: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.9457,12.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.4457 12.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.4457 2461271.9457 13.09 07:31:45.60 +24:53:46.8
194.23288 19.46672 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 9.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.145 Adeona 1 0 1 13.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:45.60 +24:53:46.8: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:31:45.60 +24:53:46.8: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.9457,13.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.4457 13.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.4457 2461271.9457 13.34 07:29:28.58 +26:26:22.8
192.50938 19.55351 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.423 Diotima 1 -0 1 13.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:28.58 +26:26:22.8: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:29:28.58 +26:26:22.8: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.9457,13.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.4457 13.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.4457 2461271.9457 13.80 06:56:37.82 +24:02:24.8
191.78712 11.78096 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.579 Sidonia -0 -0 0 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:56:37.82 +24:02:24.8: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:56:37.82 +24:02:24.8: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.9457,13.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.4457 13.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.4457 2461271.9457 13.90 07:13:22.49 +24:28:13.2
192.97507 15.44398 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 9.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.779 Nina 1 -0 1 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:22.49 +24:28:13.2: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:13:22.49 +24:28:13.2: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.9457,13.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.4457 13.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.4457 2461271.9457 13.95 07:15:01.80 +19:08:15.7
198.17645 13.64401 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.8" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.305 Gordonia 0 -0 0 14.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:15:01.80 +19:08:15.7: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:15:01.80 +19:08:15.7: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.9457,13.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.4457 13.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.4457 2461271.9457 13.03 07:14:37.70 +17:34:20.1
199.59895 12.90716 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.202 Chryseis 1 0 1 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:14:37.70 +17:34:20.1: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:14:37.70 +17:34:20.1: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.9457,13.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.4457 13.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
U Gem,2461271.9457,10.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
U Gem 20260819.4457 10.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461271.94608078 19.08.2026 10:42:11.379 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 14
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22114
Objects passed selection criteria: 22014
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 16395.2
Average stars matched: 15993.2 (97.5481 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 249880 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 19 05:44:35 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461271.94608078 19.08.2026 10:42:11.379 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 217
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 43 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 140352
Objects passed selection criteria: 139953
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 112277
Average stars matched: 108227 (96.3928 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 605144 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 19 05:46:12 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461271.94540696
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
Image size: 944.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:25.685 +21:59:50.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:25.685 +21:59:50.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0844 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
Image size: 944.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:28.340 +22:00:30.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:28.340 +22:00:30.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0950 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:25.685 +21:59:50.38
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:28.340 +22:00:30.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01520 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BGxdTTA7ML
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RNajFrZcUG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qb6zYD8zYO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Vf1r8JPsKg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.929600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.929600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4801 to +27.2943 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4801 to 27.2943 deg
Loaded 13972 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10626 out of 11736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11736 out of 23398 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 13 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.BGxdTTA7ML (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, bad_region=1, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 21361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4811 stars left (next iteration limit 5292)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4811 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.341 n_q1=904 n_q2=1356 n_q3=1059 n_q4=1492 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.183
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RNajFrZcUG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2268, bad_region=1, passed=23398
Got 23398 stars (including 21095 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4806 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4806 stars left (next iteration limit 5285)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4806 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.377 n_q1=895 n_q2=1351 n_q3=1061 n_q4=1499 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qb6zYD8zYO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=623, bad_region=0, passed=9458
Got 9458 stars (including 8822 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9458 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013119 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010496 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4812 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4812 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9449 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9449 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9449 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4813 stars left (next iteration limit 5293)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4813 robust_rms=7.129 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=21.386 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4813 robust_rms=0.510 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.608 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4813 robust_rms=0.350 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.421 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4813 robust_rms_before=1.126 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.372 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.350 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.434 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.421
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.434 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits N_match=4813 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.354 n_q1=1595 n_q2=861 n_q3=1503 n_q4=854 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.157
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Vf1r8JPsKg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=616, bad_region=0, passed=9517
Got 9517 stars (including 8891 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9517 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013118 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010494 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4810 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9511 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4809 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9512 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4809 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9512 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4809 stars left (next iteration limit 5292)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4809 robust_rms=7.082 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=21.783 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4809 robust_rms=0.526 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.638 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4809 robust_rms=0.344 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.398 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4809 robust_rms_before=1.093 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.371 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.344 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.431 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.398
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.431 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits N_match=4809 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.343 n_q1=1578 n_q2=857 n_q3=1517 n_q4=857 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.123
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits sigma_overall=0.387 worst_q_ratio=1.183
ref2=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits sigma_overall=0.426 worst_q_ratio=1.279
new1=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits sigma_overall=0.371 worst_q_ratio=1.157
new2=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits sigma_overall=0.374 worst_q_ratio=1.123
reference average sigma_overall=0.4065 worst_q_ratio=1.231
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153_astrometric_residuals.png (4811 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154_astrometric_residuals.png (4806 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462_astrometric_residuals.png (4813 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463_astrometric_residuals.png (4809 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:42.83 +22:54:43.1: 10.03 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:32.40 +23:01:31.1: 11.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:56:50.64 +20:58:42.9: 10.77 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:35.39 +22:51:40.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:09.79 +22:47:45.2: 10.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:42.83 +22:54:43.1: 10.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:56:50.64 +20:58:42.9: 10.78 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:09.79 +22:47:45.2: 10.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:35.39 +22:51:40.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:35.39 +22:51:40.2: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:32.40 +23:01:31.1: 11.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.78 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.82 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:42.83 +22:54:43.1: ref_mag=10.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=10.6023 delta=-0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:50.64 +20:58:42.9: ref_mag=10.78 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0200 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:09.79 +22:47:45.2: ref_mag=10.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.0743 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:32.40 +23:01:31.1: ref_mag=11.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2412 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31357_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 31357_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:52.62 +22:42:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31374_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 31374_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31399_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 31399_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.08 +25:59:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31419_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
Preparing report for the candidate 31419_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31422_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 31422_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31451_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 31451_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31458_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 31458_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31475_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 31475_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31488_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 31488_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:31.07 +20:02:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31506_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 31506_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.91 +22:56:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31529_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 31529_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:09.79 +21:07:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31533_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 31533_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:04.57 +22:51:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31550_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 31550_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:34.40 +24:13:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
Image size: 944.6'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:25.685 +21:59:50.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:25.685 +21:59:50.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0844 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
Image size: 944.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:28.340 +22:00:30.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:28.340 +22:00:30.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0950 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:25.685 +21:59:50.38
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:28.340 +22:00:30.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01520 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zpJjpDkmFz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pA3Yy65Ohy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0erqgDsmIq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YeTBWzL4cM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.796750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.796750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 153605 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec +16.4748 to +27.3045 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec 16.4748 to 27.3045 deg
Loaded 14009 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8793 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 153605 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 210 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.zpJjpDkmFz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=46, blended=17705, bad_region=3, passed=151450
Got 151450 stars (including 133484 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151450 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4804 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4804 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4804 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=951 n_q2=1322 n_q3=1097 n_q4=1434 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.231
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pA3Yy65Ohy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=67, blended=17785, bad_region=5, passed=153538
Got 153538 stars (including 135488 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153538 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4803 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=940 n_q2=1323 n_q3=1093 n_q4=1447 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.259
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0erqgDsmIq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=4039, bad_region=20, passed=73292
Got 73292 stars (including 69111 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 73292 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013119 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010496 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73269 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73270 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73270 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4803 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4803 robust_rms=7.286 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=18.996 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4803 robust_rms=0.507 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.587 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4803 robust_rms=0.351 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.417 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4803 robust_rms_before=1.130 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.361 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.351 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.420 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.417
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.420 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits N_match=4803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.340 n_q1=1560 n_q2=874 n_q3=1482 n_q4=887 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YeTBWzL4cM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=7, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=4029, bad_region=21, passed=73687
Got 73687 stars (including 69537 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 73687 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013118 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010494 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4841 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73666 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4840 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73666 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73666 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4801 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4801 robust_rms=7.251 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=20.552 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4801 robust_rms=0.528 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.615 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4801 robust_rms=0.344 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.406 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4801 robust_rms_before=1.099 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.361 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.344 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.415 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.406
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.415 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits N_match=4801 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.329 n_q1=1549 n_q2=895 n_q3=1476 n_q4=881 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.152
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-41-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0462.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054251_TTUQ1b1x1_1122627_MiRSKmNi/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:17:22.11 +20:05:07.7: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:23.42 +23:12:34.7: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:46.33 +23:00:05.6: 12.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:05.65 +23:08:44.6: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:33:34.05 +20:44:58.0: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:53:05.01 +18:12:16.2: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:23.42 +23:12:34.7: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:33:34.05 +20:44:58.0: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:17:22.11 +20:05:07.7: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:29:05.65 +23:08:44.6: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:46.33 +23:00:05.6: 12.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:23.42 +23:12:34.7: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0552 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:33:34.05 +20:44:58.0: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7026 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:05.65 +23:08:44.6: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5828 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:59:06.26 +24:26:56.3: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:53:05.01 +18:12:16.2: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:53:05.01 +18:12:16.2: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7516 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:17.92 +21:52:39.5: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:59:06.26 +24:26:56.3: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:59:06.26 +24:26:56.3: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6831 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:26.30 +17:41:25.4: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:56:50.39 +17:33:19.0: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:17.92 +21:52:39.5: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:17.92 +21:52:39.5: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5621 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:05.78 +19:53:08.0: 13.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:13:26.30 +17:41:25.4: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:56:50.39 +17:33:19.0: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:26.30 +17:41:25.4: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3375 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:50.39 +17:33:19.0: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4471 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:05.78 +19:53:08.0: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:05.78 +19:53:08.0: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4488 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:56:48.79 +21:43:41.8: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:56:48.79 +21:43:41.8: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:48.79 +21:43:41.8: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3971 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:25.96 +20:54:37.3: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:04:04.77 +19:49:25.8: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:25.96 +20:54:37.3: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:04:04.77 +19:49:25.8: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:25.96 +20:54:37.3: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1320 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:04:04.77 +19:49:25.8: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9698 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:55:57.46 +19:36:11.8: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:52:35.13 +17:11:26.5: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:55:57.46 +19:36:11.8: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:55:57.46 +19:36:11.8: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6658 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:52:35.13 +17:11:26.5: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:52:35.13 +17:11:26.5: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5830 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:22.17 +21:39:04.2: 11.06 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:13.86 +22:54:53.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:08:22.17 +21:39:04.2: 11.08 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.07 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:22.17 +21:39:04.2: ref_mag=11.07 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3011 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:13.86 +22:54:53.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:13.86 +22:54:53.4: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:57:57.48 +22:31:30.5: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:54.86 +22:50:50.8: 10.71 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:57:57.48 +22:31:30.5: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:54.86 +22:50:50.8: 10.73 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:57:57.48 +22:31:30.5: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3233 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.72 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:54.86 +22:50:50.8: ref_mag=10.72 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.4582 delta=-1.74 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:35.05 +19:24:25.9: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:35.05 +19:24:25.9: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:35.05 +19:24:25.9: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4762 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:01:37.26 +21:43:09.3: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:16:43.70 +22:22:38.0: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:01:37.26 +21:43:09.3: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:01:37.26 +21:43:09.3: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0241 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:51.10 +17:46:45.3: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:59:35.29 +25:22:46.3: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:16:43.70 +22:22:38.0: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:45.60 +24:53:46.8: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:13:51.10 +17:46:45.3: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:51.10 +17:46:45.3: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0757 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:59:35.29 +25:22:46.3: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:59:35.29 +25:22:46.3: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3332 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:31:45.60 +24:53:46.8: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:24.58 +22:49:54.3: 12.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:39.61 +22:49:42.7: 12.84 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:24.58 +22:49:54.3: 12.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:03:28.16 +23:00:17.5: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:39.61 +22:49:42.7: 12.94 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:39.61 +22:49:42.7: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=13.3590 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:03:28.16 +23:00:17.5: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:03:28.16 +23:00:17.5: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3681 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:56:11.37 +18:48:55.3: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:28.58 +26:26:22.8: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:56:11.37 +18:48:55.3: 13.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:11.37 +18:48:55.3: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3190 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:09:27.09 +23:56:43.3: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:29:28.58 +26:26:22.8: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:09:27.09 +23:56:43.3: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:27.09 +23:56:43.3: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5109 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:00.94 +20:13:26.2: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:56:37.82 +24:02:24.8: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:13.15 +21:04:45.4: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:00.94 +20:13:26.2: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:00.94 +20:13:26.2: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3197 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:56:37.82 +24:02:24.8: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:13.15 +21:04:45.4: 13.56 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:13.15 +21:04:45.4: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5276 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:29.30 +22:51:11.8: 13.67 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:46.20 +22:54:24.6: 11.31 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:10:37.86 +19:20:29.9: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:29.30 +22:51:11.8: 13.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.36
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:29.30 +22:51:11.8: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.36 new_mean_mag=13.5964 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:58:22.25 +22:15:09.8: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:46.20 +22:54:24.6: 11.30 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.30 +/- 0.23
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:46.20 +22:54:24.6: ref_mag=11.30 +/- 0.23 new_mean_mag=13.7322 delta=-2.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:10:37.86 +19:20:29.9: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:10:37.86 +19:20:29.9: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5892 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:58:22.25 +22:15:09.8: 13.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:58:22.25 +22:15:09.8: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8148 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:29.47 +19:24:40.8: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:11.37 +21:28:36.3: 14.15 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:16.14 +23:55:44.8: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:29.47 +19:24:40.8: 13.44 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:29.47 +19:24:40.8: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4444 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:11.37 +21:28:36.3: 14.18 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:11.37 +21:28:36.3: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7963 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:21:16.14 +23:55:44.8: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:21:16.14 +23:55:44.8: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7721 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:41.42 +22:55:55.0: 13.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:51:30.27 +19:39:07.5: 13.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:22.49 +24:28:13.2: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:41.42 +22:55:55.0: 13.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:51:30.27 +19:39:07.5: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:00.63 +23:01:53.7: 13.03 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:51:30.27 +19:39:07.5: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8158 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:15:01.80 +19:08:15.7: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:55.75 +23:00:51.6: 12.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:13:22.49 +24:28:13.2: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:00.63 +23:01:53.7: 12.98 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:00.63 +23:01:53.7: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.1285 delta=-1.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:15:01.80 +19:08:15.7: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:55.75 +23:00:51.6: 12.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:14:37.70 +17:34:20.1: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:14:37.70 +17:34:20.1: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out175463.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out176429.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out176963.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out177126.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out112593.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out175447.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176238.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176390.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176609.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176689.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out177062.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out177113.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175440_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175440_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175447_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
Preparing report for the candidate 175447_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175452_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175452_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:16.43 +17:55:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175460_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175460_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:22.34 +21:13:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175462_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175462_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175463_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175463_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:46.33 +23:00:05.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.670 3368423694978318208 106.44284288003 +23.00158983224 13.9444 13.4565 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.670#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175470_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175470_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:45.67 +17:55:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175474_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175474_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:04.28 +22:48:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175482_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175482_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:00.46 +22:07:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175484_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175484_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175485_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175485_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175491_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175491_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:31.34 +22:26:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175493_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175493_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:31.43 +18:53:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175496_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175496_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:50.80 +21:39:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175497_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175497_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:32.28 +18:46:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175500_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175500_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:10.33 +23:10:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175501_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175501_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:49.30 +19:58:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175504_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175504_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175505_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175505_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:24.45 +20:04:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175507_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175507_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175508_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175508_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:56.08 +18:43:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175510_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175510_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:31.53 +22:16:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175512_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175512_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175513_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175513_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175515_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175515_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:04.93 +20:58:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175524_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175524_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:10.13 +23:16:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175525_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175525_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:10.84 +17:06:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175526_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175526_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175528_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175528_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:33.22 +17:36:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175529_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175529_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:37.30 +18:47:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175530_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175530_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:39.10 +18:49:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175531_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175531_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:35.52 +22:12:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175534_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175534_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175536_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175536_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:09.32 +17:52:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175538_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175538_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:30.80 +18:41:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175540_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175540_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:32.88 +22:54:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175541_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175541_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:42.89 +18:22:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175542_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175542_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:34.77 +20:54:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175543_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175543_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:13.18 +19:07:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175544_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175544_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:51.32 +17:19:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175545_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175545_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:07.26 +20:36:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175548_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175548_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175553_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175553_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:24.93 +24:28:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175554_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175554_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:43.12 +20:31:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175556_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175556_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175558_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175558_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:51.43 +18:23:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175559_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175559_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:30.98 +20:09:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175561_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175561_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:08.67 +17:49:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175563_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175563_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:15.00 +18:59:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175564_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175564_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:55.78 +26:10:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175568_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175568_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:05.11 +19:40:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175570_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175570_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:12.82 +21:35:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175571_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175571_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:06.87 +20:04:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175572_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175572_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:13.09 +18:03:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175574_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175574_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175575_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175575_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:28.53 +21:02:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175577_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175577_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:01.24 +25:15:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175578_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175578_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175580_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175580_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:17.15 +19:25:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175581_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175581_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:45.92 +20:57:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175582_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175582_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:11.58 +22:11:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175583_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175583_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:01.15 +20:23:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175586_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175586_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:23.17 +22:16:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175587_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175587_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:27.80 +19:32:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175588_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175588_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:13.04 +23:55:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175590_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175590_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175726_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175726_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.91 +22:56:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175758_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175758_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:04.57 +22:51:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175801_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175801_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175803_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175803_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:38.68 +19:12:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175805_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175805_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:49.39 +19:28:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175821_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175821_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:12.54 +22:52:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175834_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175834_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:19.24 +24:07:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175844_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175844_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:25.17 +22:38:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175897_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175897_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:57.39 +22:56:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175907_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175907_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:40.92 +19:13:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175909_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175909_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:57.71 +25:46:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175913_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175913_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175935_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175935_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:52.12 +26:07:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175951_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175951_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175955_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175955_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:48.14 +17:59:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175984_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175984_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:37.90 +19:42:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175987_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 175987_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:15.06 +18:30:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176005_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176005_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:53.91 +20:58:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176008_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176008_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:02.95 +23:03:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176023_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176023_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.34 +25:56:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176026_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176026_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176027_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176027_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:54.15 +23:37:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176029_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176029_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:02.86 +23:25:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176034_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176034_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:01.09 +26:51:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176040_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176040_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:48.77 +19:51:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176050_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176050_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:37.29 +26:03:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176051_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176051_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:40.81 +22:57:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176052_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176052_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:14.49 +22:23:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176055_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176055_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:33.05 +22:42:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176076_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176076_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:31.09 +20:04:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176081_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176081_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:42.12 +22:10:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176117_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176117_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:48.29 +24:16:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176142_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176142_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:42.44 +21:18:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176161_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176161_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:23.16 +22:43:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176165_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176165_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:46.87 +22:42:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176167_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176167_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:46.73 +23:15:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176183_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176183_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:37.06 +17:45:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176192_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176192_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:07.98 +21:35:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176201_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176201_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:50.78 +18:51:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176202_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176202_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176225_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176225_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:10.14 +22:52:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176228_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176228_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:45.89 +23:26:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176238_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
Preparing report for the candidate 176238_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176259_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176259_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:08.78 +23:56:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176267_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176267_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:15.36 +21:47:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176268_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176268_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:42.80 +23:41:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176296_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176296_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:00.10 +22:57:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176304_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176304_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:46.06 +19:29:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176314_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176314_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:45.85 +25:33:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176320_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176320_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176346_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176346_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:55.37 +21:31:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176351_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176351_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176374_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176374_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:23.63 +20:20:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176376_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176376_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.16 +22:57:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176390_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
Preparing report for the candidate 176390_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176405_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176405_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.25 +24:32:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176406_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176406_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.42 +20:05:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176407_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176407_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.77 +22:49:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176413_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176413_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:36.15 +20:45:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176414_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176414_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:34.75 +20:55:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176416_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176416_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:04.20 +18:36:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176429_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176429_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:24.58 +22:49:54.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.35, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.33)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.655 3368229802974486912 106.60252799788 +22.83159962835 13.3630 12.9924 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.655#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176450_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176450_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:23.30 +18:07:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176452_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176452_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:03.46 +19:28:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176460_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176460_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:49.13 +25:18:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176481_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176481_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:48.11 +21:45:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176483_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176483_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176508_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176508_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176513_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176513_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:11.19 +24:39:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176521_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176521_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:52:40.63 +26:29:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176522_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176522_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:55.40 +20:35:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176531_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176531_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:49.51 +24:54:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176539_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176539_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:26.12 +22:50:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176541_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176541_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.03 +20:06:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176561_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176561_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176570_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176570_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:45.57 +20:26:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176579_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176579_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:33.18 +23:13:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176609_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
Preparing report for the candidate 176609_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176619_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176619_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176632_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176632_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:26.82 +19:37:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176636_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176636_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:17.10 +22:39:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176643_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176643_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:55.05 +24:28:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176644_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176644_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:40.69 +20:31:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176654_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176654_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:45.48 +21:44:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176670_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176670_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176682_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176682_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:48.50 +21:56:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176689_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
Preparing report for the candidate 176689_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176696_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176696_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176713_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176713_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:52.10 +20:05:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176725_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176725_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:16.64 +21:43:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176727_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176727_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:01.72 +21:27:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176729_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176729_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:49.64 +26:19:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176736_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176736_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:58.30 +26:47:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176737_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176737_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:22.66 +20:00:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176745_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176745_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:36.97 +26:28:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176751_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176751_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:50.52 +25:56:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176757_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176757_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:28.77 +19:21:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176763_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176763_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176773_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176773_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:28.71 +25:50:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176786_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176786_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:53.64 +18:56:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176796_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176796_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176801_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176801_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:09.78 +19:03:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176810_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176810_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176818_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176818_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:35.87 +24:19:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176825_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176825_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176832_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176832_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:42.15 +18:24:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176837_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176837_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.79 +22:50:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176842_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176842_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.14 +22:51:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176844_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176844_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:55.76 +20:49:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176852_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176852_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:01.26 +21:22:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176855_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176855_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:24.12 +25:25:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176860_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176860_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:06.80 +21:00:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176861_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176861_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:33.19 +18:14:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176863_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176863_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:02.51 +25:10:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176878_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176878_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:38.88 +24:17:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176898_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176898_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176902_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176902_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:24.69 +22:51:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176938_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176938_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176940_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176940_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176946_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176946_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:03.70 +20:16:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176949_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176949_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:40.65 +21:21:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176953_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176953_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:30.20 +22:57:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176954_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176954_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:23.85 +22:25:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176961_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176961_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:22.74 +18:10:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176963_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176963_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:41.42 +22:55:55.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.674 3368254267108183040 106.67238053067 +22.93195685837 13.9522 13.6793 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.674#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176975_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176975_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:18.93 +22:52:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176982_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 176982_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177020_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 177020_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:38.11 +22:55:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177041_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 177041_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:33.80 +24:10:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177062_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
Preparing report for the candidate 177062_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177083_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 177083_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177088_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 177088_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:55.90 +21:35:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177110_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 177110_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.66 +23:02:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177113_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
Preparing report for the candidate 177113_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177126_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 177126_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:55.75 +23:00:51.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.19, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.17)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.443 3368423042143286784 106.48267752934 +23.01451938477 14.1763 13.7119 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.443#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177137_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 177137_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:34.87 +22:52:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177143_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 177143_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:59.35 +22:48:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05956_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 05956_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:12.41 +26:47:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.08 +25:59:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163920_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 163920_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:34.45 +24:13:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112593_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
Preparing report for the candidate 112593_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66489_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
Preparing report for the candidate 66489_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120103_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 120103_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:21.43 +18:06:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100568_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463
The candidate 100568_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-42-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0463 did not pass the final checks
