fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 19.43145 | 2461271.93145 | 11.88 | 05:35:06.96 -05:26:34.1 | 8622 6149 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 19.43223 | 2461271.93223 | 11.85 | 05:35:07.08 -05:26:34.1 | 8615 6155 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits |
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.4318 2461271.9318 11.87 05:35:07.02 -05:26:34.1
209.04218 -19.44301 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 9.7 pix
The object was found in VSX
5" [H97b] 10380
Type: TTS
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
17.450 I Y 0.420 I
NOTE: the measured mag 11.87 is inconsistent with the record above (maximum 17.03), and the brighter VSX variable [H97b] 296 at 18" may be the actual counterpart.
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:35:07.02 -05:26:34.1: 11.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:35:07.02 -05:26:34.1: 11.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5 FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3 ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr) INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: Eri-05-Q1b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting Eri-05-Q1b1x1 ########### Processing Eri-05-Q1b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 191608 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 191608 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.png' -> 'transient_report/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits_preview.png'
Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
renamed 'Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.png' -> 'transient_report/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits_preview.png'
Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 842.5384 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 757.9204 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2119.4558 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 733.7244 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2108.7678 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 734.4523 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.51556 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 31.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-19T05:21:07.4362648' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-19T10:21:07.4362648' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61271.4313360648 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-19T10:21:17.3376034' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61271.4314506599 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 77.1423590383483 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -9.99965443984241 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 20.9211111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 118.565 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.78173966689681 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Eri-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '05 08 34' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 23.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.91 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 31.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 16.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.100488 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/d_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits :) Spent 0.601932 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/d_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 31.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-19T05:22:14.9204758' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-19T10:22:14.9204758' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61271.4321171297 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-19T10:22:24.8245279' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61271.4322317592 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 77.1381914787983 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -9.99966503778326 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 21.1280555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 118.766111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.75612809159668 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Eri-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '05 08 34' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 23.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.91 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 31.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 16.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.100488 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/d_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits :) Spent 0.558833 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/d_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461271.93145181 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:08:33.709 -10:00:18.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits Image size: 942.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:08:42.207 -09:59:33.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:08:33.709 -10:00:18.39 Second-epoch image center 05:08:42.207 -09:59:33.44 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0370 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Image size: 942.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:08:45.170 -10:00:11.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:08:33.709 -10:00:18.39 Second-epoch image center 05:08:45.170 -10:00:11.90 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0471 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 05:08:42.207 -09:59:33.44 Second-epoch second image center 05:08:45.170 -10:00:11.90 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01619 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3WRUgyPs4X Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hmJxv8Tk09 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bxkMD8WFAr Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rfjP4Uy8d1 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits and wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits and wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits and wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits) and catalog (wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 10760 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.1320 to 85.3599 deg, Dec -15.3183 to -4.5790 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.1320 to 85.3599 deg, Dec -15.3183 to -4.5790 deg Loaded 8249 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6415 out of 6782 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6782 out of 10760 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.852800 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.852800 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.79 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.06 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.06
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 10760 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.1320 to 85.3599 deg, Dec -15.3183 to -4.5790 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.1320 to 85.3599 deg, Dec -15.3183 to -4.5790 deg Loaded 8249 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6415 out of 6782 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6782 out of 10760 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits (aperture=6.2) Read 10560 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.1304 to 85.3494 deg, Dec -15.3101 to -4.5585 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.1304 to 85.3494 deg, Dec -15.3101 to -4.5585 deg Loaded 8259 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6348 out of 6710 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6710 out of 10560 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits (aperture=5.8) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 16 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits 2.0 pix Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits 2.4 pix fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits 2.4 pix fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.1 mag. Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits 15.1 mag. Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits 14.3 mag. fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits 14.3 mag. fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.3WRUgyPs4X (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=939, bad_region=0, passed=10760 Got 10760 stars (including 9804 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10760 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4892 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10760 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10760 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10760 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 4892 stars left (next iteration limit 5381) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits N_match=4892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.245 n_q1=1330 n_q2=1245 n_q3=1260 n_q4=1057 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.276 The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits -region wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.hmJxv8Tk09 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=913, bad_region=0, passed=10560 Got 10560 stars (including 9639 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10560 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4892 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10560 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10560 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10560 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4892 stars left (next iteration limit 5381) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits N_match=4892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.265 n_q1=1318 n_q2=1243 n_q3=1268 n_q4=1063 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.508 The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits -region wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.bxkMD8WFAr (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=421, bad_region=0, passed=6466 Got 6466 stars (including 6033 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6466 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013089 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010471 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4878 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4866 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6466 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4878 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6466 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6466 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 4867 stars left (next iteration limit 5352) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4867 robust_rms=9.689 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.020 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4867 robust_rms=0.406 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.426 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4867 robust_rms=0.280 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.308 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4867 robust_rms_before=0.779 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.261 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.280 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.299 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.308 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.299 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits N_match=4867 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.256 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.265 n_q1=1096 n_q2=1124 n_q3=1314 n_q4=1333 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.132 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.rfjP4Uy8d1 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=424, bad_region=0, passed=6547 Got 6547 stars (including 6115 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6547 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013089 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010471 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4870 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6547 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6547 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6547 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Excluding outliers - 4870 stars left (next iteration limit 5357) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=9.750 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.002 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.404 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.431 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.280 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.331 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4870 robust_rms_before=0.779 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.257 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.280 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.292 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.331 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.292 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits N_match=4870 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1097 n_q2=1128 n_q3=1308 n_q4=1337 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.110 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits sigma_overall=0.284 worst_q_ratio=1.276 ref2=Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits sigma_overall=0.334 worst_q_ratio=1.508 new1=fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits sigma_overall=0.271 worst_q_ratio=1.132 new2=fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits sigma_overall=0.265 worst_q_ratio=1.110 reference average sigma_overall=0.309 worst_q_ratio=1.392 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174_astrometric_residuals.png (4892 matched stars from wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126_astrometric_residuals.png (4892 matched stars from wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448_astrometric_residuals.png (4867 matched stars from wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449_astrometric_residuals.png (4870 matched stars from wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Eri-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:34:39.60 -05:24:25.6: 11.13 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:34:39.60 -05:24:25.6: 11.12 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.13 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:39.60 -05:24:25.6: ref_mag=11.13 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=10.8914 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20517_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 20517_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks**** FOUND 05:35:26.37 -05:25:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20521_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 20521_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 7.05 05:35:26.36 -05:25:01.3 8663 6174 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits **** FOUND 05:35:31.37 -05:25:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20523_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 20523_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 7.94 05:35:31.36 -05:25:14.4 8676 6172 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits **** FOUND 05:35:30.97 -05:16:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20527_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 20527_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 8.00 05:35:30.95 -05:16:06.2 8672 6265 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits **** FOUND 05:35:09.80 -05:27:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20582_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 20582_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 8.38 05:35:09.81 -05:27:46.3 8622 6144 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits **** FOUND 05:34:49.91 -05:18:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20601_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 20601_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 10.31 05:34:49.90 -05:18:46.0 8568 6233 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20631_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 20631_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 10.53 05:34:27.32 -05:21:58.4 8512 6197 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits **** FOUND 05:34:43.56 -05:18:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20644_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 20644_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 10.78 05:34:43.56 -05:18:29.8 8552 6235 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 19.43145 2461271.93145 10.90 05:34:39.59 -05:24:25.6 8552 6168 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20645_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 20645_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 10.88 05:34:39.61 -05:24:25.7 8544 6174 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits **** FOUND 05:14:43.75 -08:15:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20657_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 20657_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 11.01 05:14:43.76 -08:15:11.2 5618 4296 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20672_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 20672_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 11.01 05:34:27.28 -05:23:33.3 8512 6181 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20673_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 20673_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 11.21 05:34:28.73 -05:22:07.6 8516 6196 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits **** FOUND 05:35:32.36 -05:31:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20675_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 20675_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 11.16 05:35:32.39 -05:31:03.6 8681 6113 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits **** FOUND 05:34:19.51 -05:27:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 10563_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 10563_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 11.14 05:34:19.49 -05:27:12.8 8494 6143 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits **** FOUND 04:59:36.42 -14:48:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 06426_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 06426_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 7.48 04:59:36.43 -14:48:21.3 3618 0218 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits **** FOUND 05:32:20.72 -10:37:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20016_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 20016_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 10.19 05:32:20.73 -10:37:21.8 8307 2992 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits **** FOUND 05:25:43.58 -14:23:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field Eri-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:08:33.709 -10:00:18.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits Image size: 942.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:08:42.207 -09:59:33.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:08:33.709 -10:00:18.39 Second-epoch image center 05:08:42.207 -09:59:33.44 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0370 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Image size: 942.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:08:45.170 -10:00:11.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:08:33.709 -10:00:18.39 Second-epoch image center 05:08:45.170 -10:00:11.90 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0471 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 05:08:42.207 -09:59:33.44 Second-epoch second image center 05:08:45.170 -10:00:11.90 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01619 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EfcZxWhIuG Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EtI7mWYXzf Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6vsAS8hMZE Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BMjW3TXqf3 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits and wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_ Discovery image 3 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 9.77 05:25:43.58 -14:23:31.7 7420 0673 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits .fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits and wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits and wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits) and catalog (wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 65142 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.1235 to 85.3642 deg, Dec -15.3210 to -4.5615 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.1235 to 85.3642 deg, Dec -15.3210 to -4.5615 deg Loaded 8277 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6072 out of 7032 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7032 out of 65142 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.728850 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.728850 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 65142 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.1235 to 85.3642 deg, Dec -15.3210 to -4.5615 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.1235 to 85.3642 deg, Dec -15.3210 to -4.5615 deg Loaded 8277 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6072 out of 7032 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7032 out of 65142 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits (aperture=4.8) Read 68251 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.1182 to 85.3598 deg, Dec -15.3134 to -4.5306 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.1182 to 85.3598 deg, Dec -15.3134 to -4.5306 deg Loaded 8288 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6083 out of 7030 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7030 out of 68251 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits (aperture=4.5) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 38 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits 1.8 pix Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits 2.4 pix fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits 2.4 pix fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.2 mag. Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits 15.3 mag. Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits 14.4 mag. fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits 14.4 mag. fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.EfcZxWhIuG (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=4033, bad_region=3, passed=65128 Got 65128 stars (including 61014 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 65128 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4886 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65128 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65128 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65128 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 4886 stars left (next iteration limit 5374) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits N_match=4886 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.233 n_q1=1291 n_q2=1207 n_q3=1274 n_q4=1114 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.283 The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits -region wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.EtI7mWYXzf (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=33, blended=3880, bad_region=3, passed=68218 Got 68218 stars (including 64240 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 68218 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4889 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68218 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68218 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68218 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4889 stars left (next iteration limit 5377) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits N_match=4889 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=1296 n_q2=1223 n_q3=1268 n_q4=1102 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.465 The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits -region wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.6vsAS8hMZE (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1372, bad_region=16, passed=38853 Got 38853 stars (including 37399 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38853 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013089 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010471 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4870 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38853 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38853 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38853 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Excluding outliers - 4870 stars left (next iteration limit 5357) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=9.551 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.101 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.405 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.424 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.277 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.305 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4870 robust_rms_before=0.767 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.258 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.277 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.284 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.305 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.284 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits N_match=4870 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=1122 n_q2=1106 n_q3=1308 n_q4=1334 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.085 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.BMjW3TXqf3 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1393, bad_region=19, passed=39221 Got 39221 stars (including 37765 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39221 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013089 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010471 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4869 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39221 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4878 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39221 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39221 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Excluding outliers - 4869 stars left (next iteration limit 5355) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=9.695 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.245 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.405 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.434 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.279 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.333 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4869 robust_rms_before=0.769 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.256 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.279 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.278 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.333 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.278 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits N_match=4869 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.256 n_q1=1110 n_q2=1116 n_q3=1308 n_q4=1335 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.057 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Eri-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:06:28.85 -14:15:50.7: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 04:46:20.93 -09:27:31.0: 14.18 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:35:07.02 -05:26:34.1: 11.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:35:26.19 -05:27:29.4: 11.01 +/- 0.28 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 04:56:51.68 -08:33:36.7: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:04:52.25 -11:43:35.0: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:29:00.10 -11:24:13.5: 12.72 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 04:57:09.96 -06:32:23.7: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:11:27.39 -11:53:10.2: 12.97 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:23:40.21 -08:16:43.1: 13.02 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:35:26.19 -05:27:29.4: 11.16 +/- 0.29 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:35:07.02 -05:26:34.1: 11.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 04:56:51.68 -08:33:36.7: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 04:46:20.93 -09:27:31.0: 14.42 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:06:28.85 -14:15:50.7: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.08 +/- 0.20 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:35:26.19 -05:27:29.4: ref_mag=11.08 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=10.9013 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:56:51.68 -08:33:36.7: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7486 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:20.93 -09:27:31.0: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1278 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:06:28.85 -14:15:50.7: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2266 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:04:52.25 -11:43:35.0: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:29:00.10 -11:24:13.5: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:52.25 -11:43:35.0: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8566 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:29:00.10 -11:24:13.5: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8060 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 04:57:09.96 -06:32:23.7: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:11:27.39 -11:53:10.2: 13.11 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:23:40.21 -08:16:43.1: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:57:09.96 -06:32:23.7: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3277 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:11:27.39 -11:53:10.2: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0710 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:23:40.21 -08:16:43.1: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9798 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:23:15.22 -09:21:06.9: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:07:49.11 -12:37:11.9: 13.18 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 04:49:14.10 -09:00:37.0: 13.61 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:24:24.20 -10:22:08.8: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:02:11.78 -11:06:16.6: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:07:29.58 -08:40:25.8: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:23:15.22 -09:21:06.9: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:07:49.11 -12:37:11.9: 13.39 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:23:15.22 -09:21:06.9: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1749 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 04:49:14.10 -09:00:37.0: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:49.11 -12:37:11.9: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3764 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:14.10 -09:00:37.0: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5482 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:24:24.20 -10:22:08.8: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:24:24.20 -10:22:08.8: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2974 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:13:50.88 -06:44:11.2: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:07:29.58 -08:40:25.8: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:02:11.78 -11:06:16.6: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:29.58 -08:40:25.8: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5538 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:02:11.78 -11:06:16.6: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4592 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-48-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 05:10:43.34 -10:06:57.0: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:13:50.88 -06:44:11.2: 13.44 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:13:50.88 -06:44:11.2: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4197 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits at 05:10:43.34 -10:06:57.0: 13.96 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:43.34 -10:06:57.0: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9964 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82368.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82061_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 82061_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checksDiscovery image 1 2026 08 19.43145 2461271.93145 14.12 04:46:20.97 -09:27:30.7 1449 3298 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82065_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 82065_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 14.14 04:46:20.88 -09:27:31.3 1441 3304 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits **** FOUND 04:49:37.54 -06:51:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82066_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 82066_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 13.68 04:49:37.61 -06:51:28.9 1818 4909 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits **** FOUND 04:52:27.70 -07:59:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82067_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 82067_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 13.55 04:52:27.70 -07:59:05.1 2293 4257 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 19.43145 2461271.93145 13.23 05:06:28.79 -14:15:50.8 4609 0605 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82068_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 82068_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 13.22 05:06:28.91 -14:15:50.6 4601 0611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits **** FOUND 05:03:05.68 -07:54:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82070_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 82070_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 13.24 05:03:05.66 -07:54:09.7 3876 4407 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 19.43145 2461271.93145 12.75 04:56:51.72 -08:33:37.0 2981 3947 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82072_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 82072_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 12.75 04:56:51.64 -08:33:36.5 2973 3953 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits **** FOUND 05:17:35.34 -15:13:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82189_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 82189_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 7.44 05:17:35.35 -15:13:08.6 6252 0119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 19.43145 2461271.93145 10.89 05:35:26.25 -05:27:29.2 8672 6142 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82368_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 Preparing report for the candidate 82368_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82532_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 82532_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 10.92 05:35:26.14 -05:27:29.6 8663 6148 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits **** FOUND 04:51:46.06 -08:24:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82641_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 82641_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 12.83 04:51:46.05 -08:24:16.6 2206 3997 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 19.43145 2461271.93145 12.87 05:04:52.23 -11:43:35.3 4284 2120 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82691_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 82691_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 12.84 05:04:52.26 -11:43:34.7 4276 2126 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits **** FOUND 05:01:22.79 -10:39:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82702_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 82702_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 12.96 05:01:22.78 -10:39:11.1 3723 2739 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits **** FOUND 05:34:45.87 -05:58:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82709_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 82709_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 12.90 05:34:45.80 -05:58:52.1 8572 5824 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 19.43145 2461271.93145 12.86 05:29:00.09 -11:24:12.9 7835 2495 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82717_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 82717_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 12.76 05:29:00.12 -11:24:14.1 7827 2501 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits **** FOUND 04:56:49.61 -12:32:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82765_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 82765_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 13.10 04:56:49.61 -12:32:07.9 3124 1562 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 19.43145 2461271.93145 13.07 05:11:27.29 -11:53:09.2 5257 2081 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82786_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 82786_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 13.07 05:11:27.49 -11:53:11.1 5250 2087 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 19.43145 2461271.93145 13.32 04:57:09.97 -06:32:24.5 2946 5168 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82788_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 82788_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 13.33 04:57:09.94 -06:32:22.9 2938 5174 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 19.43145 2461271.93145 13.09 05:23:40.16 -08:16:43.1 6959 4344 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82813_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 82813_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 12.91 05:23:40.25 -08:16:43.1 6952 4350 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 19.43145 2461271.93145 13.17 05:23:15.22 -09:21:06.8 6926 3694 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82882_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 82882_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 13.18 05:23:15.22 -09:21:06.9 6918 3700 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits **** FOUND 05:32:29.44 -06:19:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82895_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 82895_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 13.44 05:32:29.48 -06:19:01.0 8233 5602 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 19.43145 2461271.93145 13.38 05:07:49.09 -12:37:10.4 4748 1609 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82920_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 82920_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 13.38 05:07:49.12 -12:37:13.3 4740 1615 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 19.43145 2461271.93145 13.53 04:49:14.06 -09:00:36.5 1861 3599 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82942_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 82942_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 13.57 04:49:14.13 -09:00:37.5 1853 3605 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits **** FOUND 04:53:58.88 -14:27:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82954_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 82954_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 13.47 04:53:58.88 -14:27:54.0 2782 0365 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 19.43145 2461271.93145 13.35 05:24:24.17 -10:22:10.0 7124 3089 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82972_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 82972_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 13.26 05:24:24.23 -10:22:07.7 7117 3095 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits **** FOUND 05:32:21.90 -06:24:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82980_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 82980_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 13.27 05:32:21.87 -06:23:59.6 8216 5551 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits **** FOUND 05:09:04.25 -08:46:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83001_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 83001_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 13.61 05:09:04.16 -08:46:37.9 4795 3934 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 19.43145 2461271.93145 13.56 05:07:29.61 -08:40:26.2 4565 3977 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83022_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 83022_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 13.55 05:07:29.55 -08:40:25.3 4557 3983 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits **** FOUND 05:20:43.50 -05:46:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83029_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 83029_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 13.59 05:20:43.44 -05:46:54.3 6442 5836 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 19.43145 2461271.93145 13.55 05:02:11.84 -11:06:16.9 3868 2469 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83049_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 83049_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 13.40 05:02:11.72 -11:06:16.2 3860 2475 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 19.43145 2461271.93145 13.62 05:13:50.88 -06:44:12.2 5447 5196 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83083_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 83083_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 13.31 05:13:50.88 -06:44:10.2 5440 5203 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits **** FOUND 04:52:46.04 -08:38:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83095_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 83095_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 13.51 04:52:46.01 -08:38:15.3 2366 3866 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83120_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 83120_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 13.74 05:09:57.67 -07:03:52.3 4870 4972 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits **** FOUND 05:21:50.95 -06:42:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 83275_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 83275_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 13.35 05:21:50.99 -06:42:35.0 6637 5283 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 19.43145 2461271.93145 14.03 05:10:43.32 -10:06:56.6 5091 3138 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-21-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 08588_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 08588_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 13.96 05:10:43.35 -10:06:57.4 5084 3144 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits **** FOUND 05:34:47.48 -05:57:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53894_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 53894_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 13.06 05:34:47.48 -05:57:56.7 8576 5833 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits **** FOUND 05:36:56.55 -13:04:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 39103_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 39103_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 11.80 05:36:56.56 -13:04:39.4 9050 1527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits **** FOUND 05:32:20.72 -10:37:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 43440_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 The candidate 43440_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 10.26 05:32:20.73 -10:37:21.8 8307 2992 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits **** FOUND 04:59:36.42 -14:48:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s Prepared the HTML report for the field Eri-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 05:35:07.02 -05:26:34.1 ########### Completed Eri-05-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 05:35:07.02 -05:26:34.1 ################################################################################### 05:35:07.02 -05:26:34.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' 05:35:07.02 -05:26:34.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) 05:35:07.02 -05:26:34.1 -- a known variable star Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 05:35:07.02 -05:26:34.1 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461271.93145181 -observatory V36 09:21:47.05 +17:00:47.7 Mercury (-1.6mag) 12:40:49.34 -06:25:20.4 Venus (-4.5mag) 06:21:34.12 +23:41:32.7 Mars (1.3mag) 08:52:56.17 +18:03:10.5 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:55:14.78 +03:04:57.6 Saturn (0.5mag) 04:12:49.33 +20:59:46.2 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:15:21.41 +00:07:50.3 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:27:06.04 -23:34:14.3 Pluto (14.5mag) 14:56:25.58 -22:29:12.0 Moon (-10.2mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Aug 19 05:25 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461271.93145181: 08:52:51.50 +18:03:33.0 Io (6.1mag) 08:53:07.00 +18:02:21.7 Europa (6.3mag) 08:52:42.25 +18:04:16.0 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:52:31.90 +18:04:59.8 Callisto (6.8mag) 08:50:23.97 +18:09:25.2 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:53:00.62 +18:02:51.5 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:50:02.20 +18:05:48.2 Elara (17.7mag) 08:57:04.59 +17:37:38.3 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:55:21.47 +18:16:02.3 Carme (19.0mag) 00:55:24.15 +03:05:04.4 Titan (8.4mag) 00:55:10.05 +03:05:03.9 Rhea (9.7mag) 00:55:47.91 +03:06:05.5 Iapetus (11.1mag) 00:55:30.25 +03:04:47.8 Hyperion (14.4mag) 00:54:23.09 +02:56:43.7 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 19 05:25 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461271.93145181: 19:54:54.04 -16:14:02.9 JWST 17:06:56.79 +40:14:27.3 Chandra 06:39:28.61 +12:08:39.8 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 19 05:25 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461271.93145181 -observatory V36 03:25:30.06 +18:14:31.6 17.5mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 17:59:56.43 -34:30:58.8 14.1mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:03:57.38 -69:21:27.1 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:12:31.91 +33:14:23.5 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 04:14:08.38 +41:38:10.3 17.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:29:13.05 +30:38:09.7 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:54:15.14 +26:20:19.8 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:31:59.01 +27:58:34.2 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:36:21.68 +05:18:21.0 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:14:51.74 -12:44:55.5 18.0mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 20:56:43.32 +64:32:06.5 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 15:38:23.09 -13:58:06.5 14.5mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:20:15.01 +31:52:06.4 15.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:05:47.71 +15:31:59.4 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:49:55.27 +43:28:07.9 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:53:50.97 +49:39:17.4 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:23:41.72 -12:53:52.2 15.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:03:01.73 +22:08:47.4 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 10:48:55.92 +20:09:47.6 17.1mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:05:20.88 +01:34:10.7 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:07:17.87 +76:38:30.4 16.5mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:09:53.41 +46:20:20.4 17.2mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:56:17.54 +09:39:40.5 17.4mag A/2026 E1 22:09:42.65 -31:26:41.2 7.1mag 10P/Tempel 11:35:51.67 -04:07:17.7 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 11:30:29.23 +00:58:34.5 17.4mag 63P/Wild 00:52:27.49 -05:56:48.3 15.4mag 65P/Gunn 06:00:28.83 +20:22:22.6 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 20:28:08.60 -24:43:36.1 17.5mag 84P/Giclas 03:10:08.71 +14:23:48.6 16.9mag 88P/Howell 08:23:36.81 +26:02:25.8 16.4mag 93P/Lovas 04:38:45.36 +21:15:37.1 17.3mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 06:33:10.39 +28:48:08.5 16.1mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 09:44:51.78 +24:38:59.4 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley 12:06:27.36 -14:31:04.8 17.2mag 124P/Mrkos 05:52:42.07 +21:04:37.5 16.0mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 06:47:14.67 +18:17:08.3 17.9mag 131P/Mueller 00:00:38.65 +03:11:35.4 17.5mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 03:12:59.55 -18:44:22.1 13.1mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 07:54:04.30 +38:07:27.1 16.0mag 162P/Siding Spring 11:40:43.12 +34:05:27.4 12.1mag 169P/NEAT 03:01:52.52 +09:28:32.3 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:48:33.43 -10:55:20.1 18.0mag 235P/LINEAR 20:16:56.90 -52:09:01.4 17.9mag 259P/Garradd 03:54:47.89 +29:42:57.5 15.3mag 260P/McNaught 07:38:46.83 +37:16:12.0 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:14:48.84 +01:53:09.9 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski 09:11:04.78 +17:49:00.4 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.3K Aug 19 05:25 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 19 05:25 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 19 05:25 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 14:17:41.187 +58:11:22.15 AT 2026xar 2026-08-04.19 19.1338 20:23:39.247 +11:42:39.44 SN 2026xaq 2026-08-03.95 19.47 20:19:04.225 +25:37:48.81 AT 2026xap 2026-08-03.44 18.58 12:02:08.871 -33:06:45.84 AT 2026xao 2026-08-03.72 19.152 17:22:14.965 +09:02:31.04 AT 2026xan 2026-08-04.21 19.0651 16:26:48.114 +00:11:54.67 AT 2026xam 2026-08-02.17 20.0303 15:27:21.981 +32:14:38.20 AT 2026xal 2026-08-04.18 19.7982 14:23:54.444 +14:25:40.42 AT 2026xak 2026-07-14.22 20.7881 15:31:24.622 +04:06:01.15 AT 2026xaj 2026-08-02.18 20.5636 14:35:58.114 +53:44:16.90 AT 2026xai 2026-08-02.20 20.1016 18:19:05.698 +53:11:07.41 AT 2026xah 2026-08-02.19 20.0688 20:55:20.373 -00:21:55.35 AT 2026xag 2026-08-03.47 20.94 14:15:21.615 +05:15:37.35 AT 2026xaf 2026-08-03.30 20.31 14:14:04.946 +13:34:28.62 AT 2026xae 2026-08-03.27 20.15 21:25:11.950 -47:08:43.45 AT 2026xad 2026-06-19.54 20.42 00:02:18.948 +29:04:39.95 AT 2026xac 2026-07-29.51 19.76 21:35:48.554 -26:40:57.79 AT 2026xab 2026-06-16.55 20.65 20:00:04.333 -34:58:06.08 AT 2026xaa 2026-06-16.49 20.62 14:56:06.142 +19:59:52.91 AT 2026wzz 2026-04-20.54 21.17 15:43:22.735 -12:32:40.12 AT 2026wzy 2026-01-29.65 20.48 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 19 05:25 tns_transients_list.txt Discovery image 3 2026 08 19.43223 2461271.93223 7.66 04:59:36.43 -14:48:21.4 3618 0218 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_052312_TTUQ1b1x1_356544_ASOmVdqt/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
