	Date (UTC)	JD(UTC)	mag.	R.A. & Dec.(J2000)	X & Y (pix)	Image
Discovery image 1	2026 08 19.42385	2461271.92385	13.80	00:54:06.89 -07:36:25.2	4522 1746	/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Discovery image 2	2026 08 19.42444	2461271.92444	13.83	00:54:06.91 -07:36:26.6	4519 1741	/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
	Date (UTC)	JD(UTC)	mag.	R.A. & Dec.(J2000)	X & Y (pix)	Image
Discovery image 1	2026 08 19.42385	2461271.92385	13.85	00:59:03.74 -07:21:18.4	3793 1550	/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Discovery image 2	2026 08 19.42444	2461271.92444	13.96	00:59:03.80 -07:21:18.3	3790 1544	/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
	Date (UTC)	JD(UTC)	mag.	R.A. & Dec.(J2000)	X & Y (pix)	Image
Discovery image 1	2026 08 19.42385	2461271.92385	14.24	00:24:00.25 -08:59:49.9	8961 2903	/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Discovery image 2	2026 08 19.42444	2461271.92444	14.05	00:24:00.20 -08:59:49.9	8958 2897	/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-06-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-06-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-06-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 120623 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 120623 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits_preview.png'

Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits


renamed 'Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits_preview.png'

Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 888.8278
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 475.8528
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1295.9918
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 484.4141
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1295.2349
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 484.6377
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.45809
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 31.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-19T05:10:10.9730743' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-19T10:10:10.9730743' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61271.4237381136 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-19T10:10:20.8762934' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61271.4238527315 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     12.8541702072314 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -10.0001479849977 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     46.1272222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     187.318055555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.38592527860748 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-06'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 51 26'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                  7.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 23.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               900.91 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 31.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 16.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             6.100488 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/d_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits :)

Spent 0.713084 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/d_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 31.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-19T05:11:01.9531987' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-19T10:11:01.9531987' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61271.4243281595 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-19T10:11:11.8547803' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61271.4244427546 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     12.8541701470444 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -10.0001479984127 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     46.1036111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =              187.625 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.38647279563854 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-06'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 51 26'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                  7.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 23.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               900.91 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 31.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 16.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             6.100488 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/d_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits :)

Spent 0.584216 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/d_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits



fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461271.92385385
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:25.673 -10:00:21.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:42.826 -09:58:53.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.673 -10:00:21.48
Second-epoch image center 00:51:42.826 -09:58:53.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0745 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:41.594 -09:59:26.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.673 -10:00:21.48
Second-epoch image center 00:51:41.594 -09:59:26.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0671 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  00:51:42.826 -09:58:53.97
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:41.594 -09:59:26.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01030 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits &> /tmp/tmp.l6xOyzWVPp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits &> /tmp/tmp.31q19ph0tQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lBEvPJZHRZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9EoTzASaOo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5092 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8432 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3223 to -4.5646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8432 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3223 to -4.5646 deg
Loaded 3952 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3142 out of 3267 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3267 out of 5092 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.898500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.898500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.83
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.07

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.07

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5092 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8432 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3223 to -4.5646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8432 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3223 to -4.5646 deg
Loaded 3952 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3142 out of 3267 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3267 out of 5092 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 5085 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8433 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3261 to -4.5647 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8433 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3261 to -4.5647 deg
Loaded 3953 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3150 out of 3266 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3266 out of 5085 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
 2.1 pix  Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.1 mag.  Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
 15.1 mag.  Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
 14.9 mag.  fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
 14.9 mag.  fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.9 (SNR )  11.9 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.l6xOyzWVPp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=365, bad_region=0, passed=5092
Got 5092 stars (including 4723 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5092 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4636 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4633 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4636 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 
Excluding outliers - 4633 stars left (next iteration limit 5096)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits N_match=4633 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.240 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.237 n_q1=1035 n_q2=1250 n_q3=1126 n_q4=1222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.170
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -region wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.31q19ph0tQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=357, bad_region=0, passed=5085
Got 5085 stars (including 4722 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5085 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4635 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4633 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5085 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4635 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5085 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5085 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 
Excluding outliers - 4633 stars left (next iteration limit 5096)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits N_match=4633 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.225 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.229 n_q1=1046 n_q2=1259 n_q3=1120 n_q4=1208 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.229
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits -region wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lBEvPJZHRZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=320, bad_region=0, passed=4477
Got 4477 stars (including 4154 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4477 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4076 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4073 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4073 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4073 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4477 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4077 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4074 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4477 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4074 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4477 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Excluding outliers - 4074 stars left (next iteration limit 4480)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4074 robust_rms=11.839 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.446 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4074 robust_rms=0.472 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.515 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4074 robust_rms=0.292 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.326 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4074 robust_rms_before=1.060 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.300 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.292 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.334 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.326
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.334 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits N_match=4074 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=968 n_q2=1040 n_q3=1029 n_q4=1037 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.041
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9EoTzASaOo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=323, bad_region=1, passed=4442
Got 4442 stars (including 4112 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4442 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4042 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4039 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4039 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4039 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4442 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4043 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4040 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4442 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4040 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4442 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 4040 stars left (next iteration limit 4442)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4040 robust_rms=11.744 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.513 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4040 robust_rms=0.501 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.592 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4040 robust_rms=0.323 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.377 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4040 robust_rms_before=1.087 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.327 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.323 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.375 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.377
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.375 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits N_match=4040 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.314 n_q1=956 n_q2=1026 n_q3=1029 n_q4=1029 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.086
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits sigma_overall=0.266 worst_q_ratio=1.170
ref2=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits sigma_overall=0.252 worst_q_ratio=1.229
new1=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits sigma_overall=0.312 worst_q_ratio=1.041
new2=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits sigma_overall=0.336 worst_q_ratio=1.086
reference average sigma_overall=0.259 worst_q_ratio=1.1995
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069_astrometric_residuals.png (4633 matched stars from wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070_astrometric_residuals.png (4633 matched stars from wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436_astrometric_residuals.png (4074 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437_astrometric_residuals.png (4040 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:28:41.29 -04:49:14.3:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:28:41.29 -04:49:14.3:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:41.29 -04:49:14.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20256_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 20256_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.42385    2461271.92385    9.21    00:28:41.29 -04:49:14.4   8463 0315   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.42444    2461271.92444    9.21    00:28:41.28 -04:49:14.3   8461 0309   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02190_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 02190_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 19.42444    2461271.92444    10.82    00:24:03.91 -09:19:42.5   8932 3097   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

**** FOUND  00:24:03.90 -09:19:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:25.673 -10:00:21.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:42.826 -09:58:53.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.673 -10:00:21.48
Second-epoch image center 00:51:42.826 -09:58:53.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0745 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:41.594 -09:59:26.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.673 -10:00:21.48
Second-epoch image center 00:51:41.594 -09:59:26.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0671 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  00:51:42.826 -09:58:53.97
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:41.594 -09:59:26.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01030 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZodTxbkOCF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits &> /tmp/tmp.axzwHh5Vc3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CoekPvSw6R
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ViucVFmiIR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 26253 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8317 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3222 to -4.5543 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8317 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3222 to -4.5543 deg
Loaded 3954 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3110 out of 3352 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3352 out of 26253 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.789500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.789500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.58
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.21

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.21

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 26253 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8317 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3222 to -4.5543 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8317 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3222 to -4.5543 deg
Loaded 3954 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3110 out of 3352 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3352 out of 26253 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 25987 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8346 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3332 to -4.5616 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8346 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3332 to -4.5616 deg
Loaded 3957 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3129 out of 3354 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3354 out of 25987 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 36 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
 2.1 pix  Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
 2.0 pix  fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
 2.0 pix  fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.2 mag.  Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
 15.2 mag.  Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
 15.1 mag.  fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
 15.1 mag.  fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  15.1 (SNR )  14.4 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ZodTxbkOCF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1010, bad_region=3, passed=26243
Got 26243 stars (including 25198 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26243 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 
Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.238 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.233 n_q1=1164 n_q2=1283 n_q3=1215 n_q4=1234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -region wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.axzwHh5Vc3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=998, bad_region=3, passed=25977
Got 25977 stars (including 24935 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25977 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 
Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5387)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.235 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.226 n_q1=1165 n_q2=1283 n_q3=1216 n_q4=1234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.186
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits -region wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CoekPvSw6R (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=922, bad_region=35, passed=25294
Got 25294 stars (including 24288 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25294 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25294 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25294 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25294 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 4884 stars left (next iteration limit 5371)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=11.125 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.328 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=0.471 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.520 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=0.298 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.336 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4884 robust_rms_before=1.053 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.303 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.298 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.342 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.336
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.342 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits N_match=4884 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=1218 n_q2=1265 n_q3=1191 n_q4=1210 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.084
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ViucVFmiIR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=946, bad_region=36, passed=25434
Got 25434 stars (including 24407 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25434 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Excluding outliers - 4887 stars left (next iteration limit 5374)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4887 robust_rms=11.152 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.394 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4887 robust_rms=0.502 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.574 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4887 robust_rms=0.323 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.380 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4887 robust_rms_before=1.080 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.327 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.323 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.378 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.380
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.378 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits N_match=4887 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.307 n_q1=1224 n_q2=1260 n_q3=1198 n_q4=1205 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.099
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:36:22.40 -05:24:38.2:  14.24 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:54:06.90 -07:36:25.9:  15.96 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:26:15.31 -12:44:35.1:  13.23 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:28:21.72 -07:22:01.5:  13.98 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:48:23.04 -10:41:07.7:  13.41 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:28:41.29 -04:49:14.4:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:59:03.77 -07:21:18.3:  15.93 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:56:29.85 -05:25:29.5:  13.51 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:59:24.52 -11:53:31.0:  14.11 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:30:58.09 -08:54:08.4:  13.79 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:48:23.04 -10:41:07.7:  13.38 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:59:03.77 -07:21:18.3:  15.91 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:54:06.90 -07:36:25.9:  15.87 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:26:15.31 -12:44:35.1:  13.28 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:28:21.72 -07:22:01.5:  14.11 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:28:41.29 -04:49:14.4:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:41.29 -04:49:14.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:48:23.04 -10:41:07.7: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7029 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:36:22.40 -05:24:38.2:  14.26 +/- 0.10  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:15.31 -12:44:35.1: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5223 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.04 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.25 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:21.72 -07:22:01.5: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3713 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:36:22.40 -05:24:38.2: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3978 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:56:29.85 -05:25:29.5:  13.35 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:56:29.85 -05:25:29.5: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0608 delta=-0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:30:58.09 -08:54:08.4:  13.68 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.73 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:58.09 -08:54:08.4: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1585 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:59:24.52 -11:53:31.0:  13.97 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.03 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:59:24.52 -11:53:31.0: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0874 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:17:08.21 -07:19:06.3:  14.69 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:24:00.23 -08:59:49.9:  15.59 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:50:22.65 -05:52:04.9:  14.44 +/- 0.10  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:30:27.79 -13:48:57.6:  14.84 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:35:21.92 -09:57:40.0:  14.62 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:15.61 -06:11:10.6:  14.77 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:21:06.06 -10:00:42.8:  14.74 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:14:11.22 -06:03:07.9:  15.12 +/- 0.21  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:17:08.21 -07:19:06.3:  14.81 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:24:00.23 -08:59:49.9:  15.59 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.74 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:08.21 -07:19:06.3: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5770 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:30:27.79 -13:48:57.6:  15.03 +/- 0.22  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:35:21.92 -09:57:40.0:  14.63 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:15.61 -06:11:10.6:  14.73 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.92 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.63 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.75 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:27.79 -13:48:57.6: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5594 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:15.61 -06:11:10.6: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7322 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:35:21.92 -09:57:40.0: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5402 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:50:22.65 -05:52:04.9:  14.29 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:14:11.22 -06:03:07.9:  15.18 +/- 0.23  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:21:06.06 -10:00:42.8:  14.59 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.36 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.15 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.65 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:50:22.65 -05:52:04.9: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4737 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:14:11.22 -06:03:07.9: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6842 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:21:06.06 -10:00:42.8: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4983 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:24:00.44 -13:30:01.7:  14.90 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:21:26.83 -10:18:14.9:  14.84 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:32:46.92 -12:37:23.1:  15.05 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:13:34.83 -07:34:03.8:  14.98 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:26:29.84 -05:43:29.6:  14.92 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:31:01.83 -04:55:42.2:  15.20 +/- 0.23  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:24:00.44 -13:30:01.7:  14.55 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.68 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:00.44 -13:30:01.7: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4705 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:13:34.83 -07:34:03.8:  14.99 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:21:26.83 -10:18:14.9:  15.14 +/- 0.24  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:29:23.68 -10:06:09.3:  14.82 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.99 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:32:46.92 -12:37:23.1:  15.17 +/- 0.22  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:13:34.83 -07:34:03.8: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7728 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.95 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:21:26.83 -10:18:14.9: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5182 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.10 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:32:46.92 -12:37:23.1: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6406 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:31:01.83 -04:55:42.2:  15.16 +/- 0.24  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:26:29.84 -05:43:29.6:  14.59 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.18 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.71 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:01.83 -04:55:42.2: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.7086 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:29.84 -05:43:29.6: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7146 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:29:23.68 -10:06:09.3:  14.55 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.66 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:23.68 -10:06:09.3: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6498 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:46:54.57 -14:30:00.8:  14.97 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:36:30.66 -06:14:30.1:  14.93 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:35:55.51 -10:57:27.4:  14.70 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:24:49.81 -12:00:05.0:  14.81 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:46:54.57 -14:30:00.8:  14.98 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.98 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:46:54.57 -14:30:00.8: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6956 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:36:30.66 -06:14:30.1:  15.34 +/- 0.22  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.07 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:35:55.51 -10:57:27.4:  14.78 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:36:30.66 -06:14:30.1: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7423 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:24:49.81 -12:00:05.0:  15.17 +/- 0.26  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.73 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.93 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:35:55.51 -10:57:27.4: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5438 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:49.81 -12:00:05.0: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7865 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32216.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32225.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32462.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31607_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 31607_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.42385    2461271.92385    14.41    00:36:22.40 -05:24:39.0   7269 0594   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.42444    2461271.92444    14.39    00:36:22.41 -05:24:37.3   7267 0588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31608_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 31608_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.42385    2461271.92385    14.38    00:28:21.72 -07:22:02.7   8385 1865   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.42444    2461271.92444    14.36    00:28:21.71 -07:22:00.2   8382 1859   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31616_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 31616_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.42385    2461271.92385    13.56    00:26:15.28 -12:44:35.6   8436 5140   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.42444    2461271.92444    13.50    00:26:15.34 -12:44:34.6   8433 5135   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31617_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 31617_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.42444    2461271.92444    13.39    00:40:21.29 -05:00:07.0   6685 0300   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

**** FOUND  00:40:21.27 -05:00:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31636_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 31636_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.42385    2461271.92385    9.18    00:28:41.29 -04:49:14.5   8463 0315   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.42444    2461271.92444    9.18    00:28:41.28 -04:49:14.4   8461 0309   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32112_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 32112_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.42444    2461271.92444    13.53    00:33:29.52 -06:43:51.6   7639 1418   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

**** FOUND  00:33:29.51 -06:43:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32212_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 32212_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.42385    2461271.92385    13.73    00:48:23.06 -10:41:07.6   5254 3649   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.42444    2461271.92444    13.68    00:48:23.03 -10:41:07.9   5251 3644   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32216_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
Preparing report for the candidate 32216_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32225_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
Preparing report for the candidate 32225_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32246_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 32246_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.42444    2461271.92444    13.80    00:51:17.14 -08:35:48.7   4902 2362   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

**** FOUND  00:51:17.18 -08:35:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32339_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 32339_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.42385    2461271.92385    14.07    00:56:29.83 -05:25:30.0   4245 0407   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.42444    2461271.92444    14.06    00:56:29.86 -05:25:28.9   4242 0401   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32369_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 32369_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.42385    2461271.92385    14.10    00:59:24.58 -11:53:31.2   3585 4275   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.42444    2461271.92444    14.07    00:59:24.47 -11:53:30.8   3582 4269   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32429_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 32429_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.42385    2461271.92385    14.19    00:30:58.09 -08:54:09.4   7917 2763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.42444    2461271.92444    14.13    00:30:58.08 -08:54:07.3   7915 2757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32442_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 32442_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.42444    2461271.92444    14.16    00:33:24.59 -06:43:52.3   7651 1419   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

**** FOUND  00:33:24.61 -06:43:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32462_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
Preparing report for the candidate 32462_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32517_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 32517_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.42385    2461271.92385    14.42    00:50:22.64 -05:52:04.3   5146 0732   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.42444    2461271.92444    14.53    00:50:22.66 -05:52:05.6   5143 0727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32559_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 32559_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.42385    2461271.92385    14.54    01:17:08.16 -07:19:06.4   1077 1378   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.42444    2461271.92444    14.63    01:17:08.25 -07:19:06.2   1074 1372   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32581_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 32581_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.42444    2461271.92444    14.55    00:57:34.89 -05:00:04.8   4094 0134   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

**** FOUND  00:57:34.92 -05:00:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32609_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 32609_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.42385    2461271.92385    14.46    00:30:27.71 -13:48:57.1   7760 5736   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.42444    2461271.92444    14.73    00:30:27.88 -13:48:58.1   7757 5730   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32613_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 32613_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.42385    2461271.92385    14.51    00:35:21.96 -09:57:40.2   7211 3351   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.42444    2461271.92444    14.58    00:35:21.89 -09:57:39.7   7209 3345   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32619_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 32619_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.42385    2461271.92385    14.69    01:19:15.59 -06:11:10.3   0782 0672   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.42444    2461271.92444    14.83    01:19:15.63 -06:11:10.8   0780 0666   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32624_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 32624_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.42385    2461271.92385    14.50    00:21:06.07 -10:00:42.6   9347 3554   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.42444    2461271.92444    14.50    00:21:06.05 -10:00:43.0   9345 3548   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32630_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 32630_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.42385    2461271.92385    14.65    01:14:11.17 -06:03:08.3   1558 0632   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.42444    2461271.92444    14.73    01:14:11.26 -06:03:07.6   1555 0626   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32631_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 32631_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.42385    2461271.92385    14.48    00:24:00.49 -13:30:00.8   8733 5631   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.42444    2461271.92444    14.46    00:24:00.40 -13:30:02.6   8730 5625   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32645_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 32645_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.42385    2461271.92385    14.66    01:13:34.85 -07:34:04.1   1609 1557   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.42444    2461271.92444    15.01    01:13:34.81 -07:34:03.5   1606 1551   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32653_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 32653_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.42385    2461271.92385    14.51    00:21:26.80 -10:18:14.6   9280 3727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.42444    2461271.92444    14.53    00:21:26.86 -10:18:15.2   9277 3721   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32661_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 32661_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.42385    2461271.92385    14.56    00:32:46.98 -12:37:22.1   7473 4985   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.42444    2461271.92444    14.78    00:32:46.87 -12:37:24.1   7470 4979   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32669_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 32669_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.42385    2461271.92385    14.65    00:31:01.80 -04:55:42.5   8102 0356   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.42444    2461271.92444    14.80    00:31:01.85 -04:55:41.8   8099 0350   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32684_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 32684_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.42385    2461271.92385    14.66    00:26:29.84 -05:43:30.9   8751 0890   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.42444    2461271.92444    14.80    00:26:29.83 -05:43:28.4   8748 0884   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32699_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 32699_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.42444    2461271.92444    14.72    00:25:23.65 -06:34:31.8   8872 1413   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

**** FOUND  00:25:23.62 -06:34:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32705_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 32705_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.42385    2461271.92385    14.65    00:29:23.67 -10:06:08.4   8095 3505   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.42444    2461271.92444    14.65    00:29:23.68 -10:06:10.2   8093 3500   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32710_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 32710_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.42385    2461271.92385    14.70    00:46:54.63 -14:30:01.7   5318 5962   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.42444    2461271.92444    14.69    00:46:54.52 -14:29:59.8   5316 5956   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32712_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 32712_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.42385    2461271.92385    14.70    00:36:30.74 -06:14:30.5   7210 1096   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.42444    2461271.92444    14.79    00:36:30.59 -06:14:29.8   7208 1091   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32722_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 32722_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.42385    2461271.92385    14.67    00:35:55.47 -10:57:27.6   7083 3944   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.42444    2461271.92444    14.46    00:35:55.56 -10:57:27.2   7080 3938   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32748_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 32748_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.42385    2461271.92385    14.80    00:24:49.80 -12:00:05.2   8685 4710   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-10-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.42444    2461271.92444    14.77    00:24:49.82 -12:00:04.7   8682 4704   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17817_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437
The candidate 17817_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 19.42444    2461271.92444    13.54    00:53:29.51 -14:30:34.3   4355 5900   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_051310_TTUQ1b1x1_4100045_qmnuraya/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

**** FOUND  00:53:29.52 -14:30:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
00:54:06.90 -07:36:25.9
00:59:03.77 -07:21:18.3
00:24:00.23 -08:59:49.9
########### Completed Cet-06-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
00:54:06.90 -07:36:25.9
00:59:03.77 -07:21:18.3
00:24:00.23 -08:59:49.9
###################################################################################
00:54:06.90 -07:36:25.9  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
00:59:03.77 -07:21:18.3  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
00:24:00.23 -08:59:49.9  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461271.92385385 -observatory V36
09:21:43.37 +17:01:02.1 Mercury (-1.6mag)
12:40:47.82 -06:25:07.6 Venus (-4.5mag)
06:21:32.82 +23:41:32.9 Mars (1.3mag)
08:52:55.77 +18:03:12.1 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:55:14.84 +03:04:58.1 Saturn (0.5mag)
04:12:49.30 +20:59:46.1 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:15:21.44 +00:07:50.5 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:27:06.08 -23:34:14.2 Pluto (14.5mag)
14:55:54.68 -22:27:55.1 Moon (-10.2mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Aug 19 05:15 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461271.92385385:
08:52:51.06 +18:03:34.7 Io (6.1mag)
08:53:06.63 +18:02:23.1 Europa (6.3mag)
08:52:41.82 +18:04:17.7 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:52:31.52 +18:05:01.2 Callisto (6.8mag)
08:50:23.57 +18:09:26.5 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:53:00.27 +18:02:52.8 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:50:01.79 +18:05:49.5 Elara (17.7mag)
08:57:04.19 +17:37:40.0 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:55:21.10 +18:16:03.7 Carme (19.0mag)
00:55:24.24 +03:05:04.8 Titan (8.4mag)
00:55:10.16 +03:05:04.4 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:55:47.96 +03:06:06.0 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:55:30.32 +03:04:48.2 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:54:23.17 +02:56:44.3 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 19 05:15 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461271.92385385:
19:54:52.05 -16:14:32.6 JWST
17:05:49.98 +40:26:17.6 Chandra
06:36:50.40 +13:37:40.4 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 19 05:15 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461271.92385385 -observatory V36
03:25:29.63 +18:14:29.6 17.5mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
17:59:56.45 -34:30:59.2 14.1mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:03:56.97 -69:21:25.8 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:12:31.82 +33:14:22.9 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
04:14:07.31 +41:38:02.2 17.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:29:13.44 +30:38:12.1 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:54:14.72 +26:20:20.3 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:31:58.58 +27:58:35.4 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:36:21.38 +05:18:21.0 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:14:51.62 -12:44:54.3 18.0mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
20:56:43.85 +64:32:10.7 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:38:23.40 -13:58:04.1 14.5mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:20:14.53 +31:52:05.1 15.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:05:47.73 +15:31:59.6 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:49:55.76 +43:28:07.7 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:53:51.67 +49:39:17.0 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:23:41.39 -12:53:52.2 15.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:03:01.48 +22:08:52.4 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
10:48:55.24 +20:09:49.5 17.1mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:05:20.56 +01:34:12.7 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:07:17.41 +76:38:33.7 16.5mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:09:53.40 +46:20:20.2 17.2mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:56:17.13 +09:39:38.0 17.4mag A/2026 E1
22:09:42.27 -31:26:33.0 7.1mag 10P/Tempel
11:35:51.38 -04:07:15.8 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
11:30:28.29 +00:58:43.4 17.4mag 63P/Wild
00:52:27.62 -05:56:46.8 15.4mag 65P/Gunn
06:00:27.85 +20:22:23.7 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:28:08.98 -24:43:33.6 17.5mag 84P/Giclas
03:10:08.41 +14:23:47.2 16.9mag 88P/Howell
08:23:35.73 +26:02:30.0 16.4mag 93P/Lovas
04:38:44.01 +21:15:26.2 17.3mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
06:33:08.92 +28:48:12.9 16.1mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:44:50.71 +24:39:04.5 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley
12:06:26.41 -14:30:54.6 17.2mag 124P/Mrkos
05:52:41.44 +21:04:37.9 16.0mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:47:13.93 +18:17:09.9 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
00:00:38.81 +03:11:36.2 17.5mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:13:00.03 -18:44:23.1 13.1mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
07:54:02.79 +38:07:26.9 16.0mag 162P/Siding Spring
11:40:49.43 +34:06:05.4 12.1mag 169P/NEAT
03:01:51.85 +09:28:32.9 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
16:48:33.09 -10:55:18.1 18.0mag 235P/LINEAR
20:16:57.04 -52:09:04.5 17.9mag 259P/Garradd
03:54:46.58 +29:42:46.9 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
07:38:45.49 +37:16:13.5 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:14:48.63 +01:53:13.0 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski
09:11:04.37 +17:49:01.7 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.3K Aug 19 05:15 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60  SN 2026sfn  2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00  SN 2026yib  2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70  SN 2026whu  2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90  ASASSN-26ew  2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00  SN 2026wkv  2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10  SN2026wpd  2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80  SN2026wjs  2026-08-9.35 17.12
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70  AT2026xau  2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50  SN2026weo  2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40  AT2026wdy  2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10  AT2026pvk  2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20  AT2026plb  2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30  SN2026ore  2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30  AT2026oxl  2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20  AT2026ouj  2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20  AT2026ntk  2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.6 15.52
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70  SN 2026obc  2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90  ASASSN-26dr  2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00  ASASSN-26ds  2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 19 05:15 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0  TCP J19512142+3706400  2026-06-17.2942  16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4  TCP J19570387+3741464  2026-06-18.2638  17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3  PNV J00423204+4110283  2026-06-26.059  16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8  TCP J02191736+2857158  2026-07-12.3549  12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6  PNV J00445643+4157416  2026-07-13.8026  17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0  PNV J00425536+4117270  2026-07-20.1813  17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9  TCP J20354364+6131329  2026-07-20.5443  14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0  TCP J21173148+2225510  2026-07-23.5577  14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8  PNV J00412404+4049028  2026-07-25.0157  18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6  PNV J00430426+4102286  2026-07-26.1512  20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0  TCP J14515140+6613240  2026-07-29.2561  13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2  PNV J00430615+4122082  2026-07-30.0085  19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2  PNV J00413323+4110122  2026-08-02.8913  17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-06.4109  11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8  TCP J22571796+4707418  2026-08-09.3289  14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1  PSN J09133817+7628181  2026-08-09.8037  15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6  PNV J00431729+4126486  2026-08-14.0920  16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6  PNV J00425282+4110586  2026-08-17.7723  19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6  PNV J00425283+4110596  2026-08-18.6119  19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3  TCP J18251276-2225293  2026-08-19.1062  9.4mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 19 05:15 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
14:17:41.187 +58:11:22.15  AT 2026xar  2026-08-04.19 19.1338
20:23:39.247 +11:42:39.44  SN 2026xaq  2026-08-03.95 19.47
20:19:04.225 +25:37:48.81  AT 2026xap  2026-08-03.44 18.58
12:02:08.871 -33:06:45.84  AT 2026xao  2026-08-03.72 19.152
17:22:14.965 +09:02:31.04  AT 2026xan  2026-08-04.21 19.0651
16:26:48.114 +00:11:54.67  AT 2026xam  2026-08-02.17 20.0303
15:27:21.981 +32:14:38.20  AT 2026xal  2026-08-04.18 19.7982
14:23:54.444 +14:25:40.42  AT 2026xak  2026-07-14.22 20.7881
15:31:24.622 +04:06:01.15  AT 2026xaj  2026-08-02.18 20.5636
14:35:58.114 +53:44:16.90  AT 2026xai  2026-08-02.20 20.1016
18:19:05.698 +53:11:07.41  AT 2026xah  2026-08-02.19 20.0688
20:55:20.373 -00:21:55.35  AT 2026xag  2026-08-03.47 20.94
14:15:21.615 +05:15:37.35  AT 2026xaf  2026-08-03.30 20.31
14:14:04.946 +13:34:28.62  AT 2026xae  2026-08-03.27 20.15
21:25:11.950 -47:08:43.45  AT 2026xad  2026-06-19.54 20.42
00:02:18.948 +29:04:39.95  AT 2026xac  2026-07-29.51 19.76
21:35:48.554 -26:40:57.79  AT 2026xab  2026-06-16.55 20.65
20:00:04.333 -34:58:06.08  AT 2026xaa  2026-06-16.49 20.62
14:56:06.142 +19:59:52.91  AT 2026wzz  2026-04-20.54 21.17
15:43:22.735 -12:32:40.12  AT 2026wzy  2026-01-29.65 20.48
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 19 05:15 tns_transients_list.txt
NMW transient search results

Processing complete!

FITS images used in this processing run:

Processing log:

Filtering log:

Profiling:
