This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.4066 2461271.9066 7.87 01:55:11.10 +01:26:26.1
153.71914 -57.57004 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 4.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.4 Vesta -1 -2 2 7.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 01:55:11.10 +01:26:26.1: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 01:55:11.10 +01:26:26.1: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 19.4066* 01 55 11.10 +01 26 26.1 7.9 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.9066,7.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.4066 7.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.4066 2461271.9066 9.20 01:38:34.67 -01:41:57.8
148.86659 -62.17376 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 4.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2 Pallas 0 -0 0 9.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 01:38:34.67 -01:41:57.8: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 01:38:34.67 -01:41:57.8: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 19.4066* 01 38 34.67 -01 41 57.8 9.2 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.9066,9.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.4066 9.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.4066 2461271.9066 13.23 01:35:33.01 -04:58:12.0
150.26017 -65.47394 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 4.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.166 Rhodope -1 -0 1 13.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 01:35:33.01 -04:58:12.0: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 01:35:33.01 -04:58:12.0: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 19.4066* 01 35 33.01 -04 58 12.0 13.2 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.9066,13.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.4066 13.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.4066 2461271.9066 13.38 01:27:24.86 +02:17:07.1
140.76711 -59.33494 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 4.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.191 Kolga -0 -0 0 13.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 01:27:24.86 +02:17:07.1: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 01:27:24.86 +02:17:07.1: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 19.4066* 01 27 24.86 +02 17 07.1 13.4 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.9066,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.4066 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.4066 2461271.9066 13.24 02:13:02.81 -00:20:02.0
162.47872 -56.80382 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 4.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.360 Carlova -0 -0 0 13.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 02:13:02.81 -00:20:02.0: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 02:13:02.81 -00:20:02.0: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 19.4066* 02 13 02.81 +00 20 02.0 13.2 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.9066,13.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.4066 13.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.4066 2461271.9066 14.36 01:47:09.93 +01:32:43.2
150.22693 -58.34198 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 4.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.783 Nora 0 0 1 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 01:47:09.93 +01:32:43.2: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 01:47:09.93 +01:32:43.2: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 19.4066* 01 47 09.93 +01 32 43.2 14.4 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.9066,14.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.4066 14.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.4066 2461271.9066 14.52 01:20:06.56 +01:52:55.5
137.45526 -60.17870 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 4.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.805 Hormuthia -0 -1 1 14.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 01:20:06.56 +01:52:55.5: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 01:20:06.56 +01:52:55.5: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 19.4066* 01 20 06.56 +01 52 55.5 14.5 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.9066,14.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.4066 14.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.4066 2461271.9066 14.74 01:37:42.63 +01:16:20.0
146.19383 -59.49340 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 4.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1689 Floris-Jan -1 -0 1 15.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 01:37:42.63 +01:16:20.0: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 01:37:42.63 +01:16:20.0: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 19.4066* 01 37 42.63 +01 16 20.0 14.7 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.9066,14.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.4066 14.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.62882272 09.01.2026 03:05:20.283 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
First image: 2461049.62882272 09.01.2026 03:05:20.283 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
Last image: 2461271.90690468 19.08.2026 09:45:46.564 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.66
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6112
Objects passed selection criteria: 6107
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5816.25
Average stars matched: 5630.25 (96.8021 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232296 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 19 04:49:27 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.62882272 09.01.2026 03:05:20.283 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
First image: 2461049.62882272 09.01.2026 03:05:20.283 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
Last image: 2461271.90690468 19.08.2026 09:45:46.564 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 178
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 31385
Objects passed selection criteria: 31319
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 29521
Average stars matched: 28631.2 (96.986 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 254492 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 19 04:50:18 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461271.90637971
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:43:00.023 -01:58:47.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:42:50.074 -02:00:59.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:43:00.023 -01:58:47.42
Second-epoch image center 01:42:50.074 -02:00:59.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0553 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:42:50.622 -02:01:25.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:43:00.023 -01:58:47.42
Second-epoch image center 01:42:50.622 -02:01:25.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0588 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:42:50.074 -02:00:59.30
Second-epoch second image center 01:42:50.622 -02:01:25.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00755 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yG8XfRnmVf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ScUTqfJ7lp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bynNOKIYK8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NRmhjJKMgL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits and wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits and wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits and wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5890 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.8513 to 33.6869 deg, Dec -7.2828 to +3.3396 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.8513 to 33.6869 deg, Dec -7.2828 to 3.3396 deg
Loaded 4101 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3360 out of 3515 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3515 out of 5890 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.897750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.897750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.66
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5890 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.8513 to 33.6869 deg, Dec -7.2828 to +3.3396 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.8513 to 33.6869 deg, Dec -7.2828 to 3.3396 deg
Loaded 4101 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3360 out of 3515 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3515 out of 5890 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 5840 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.8340 to 33.6849 deg, Dec -7.2949 to +3.3140 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.8340 to 33.6849 deg, Dec -7.2949 to 3.3140 deg
Loaded 4102 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3373 out of 3516 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3516 out of 5840 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
2.0 pix Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
15.2 mag. Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.yG8XfRnmVf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=428, bad_region=0, passed=5890
Got 5890 stars (including 5451 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5890 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1255 n_q2=1225 n_q3=1248 n_q4=1168 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.293
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits -region wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ScUTqfJ7lp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=411, bad_region=0, passed=5840
Got 5840 stars (including 5424 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5840 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4891 stars left (next iteration limit 5380)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits N_match=4891 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.251 n_q1=1265 n_q2=1219 n_q3=1244 n_q4=1163 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.304
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits -region wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bynNOKIYK8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=344, bad_region=0, passed=5889
Got 5889 stars (including 5538 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5889 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Excluding outliers - 4886 stars left (next iteration limit 5373)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=10.638 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.022 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=0.341 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.352 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=0.242 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.265 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4886 robust_rms_before=0.986 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.236 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.242 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.266 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.265
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.266 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits N_match=4886 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.240 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.247 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.224 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.216 n_q1=1200 n_q2=1201 n_q3=1223 n_q4=1262 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.167
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NRmhjJKMgL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=344, bad_region=0, passed=5809
Got 5809 stars (including 5457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5809 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=10.748 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.944 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=0.373 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.396 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=0.275 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.280 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4882 robust_rms_before=0.994 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.267 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.275 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.275 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.280
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.275 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.265 n_q1=1198 n_q2=1206 n_q3=1231 n_q4=1247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.019
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits sigma_overall=0.292 worst_q_ratio=1.293
ref2=Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits sigma_overall=0.287 worst_q_ratio=1.304
new1=fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits sigma_overall=0.240 worst_q_ratio=1.167
new2=fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits sigma_overall=0.275 worst_q_ratio=1.019
reference average sigma_overall=0.2895 worst_q_ratio=1.2985
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077_astrometric_residuals.png (4896 matched stars from wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078_astrometric_residuals.png (4891 matched stars from wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410_astrometric_residuals.png (4886 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.22 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411_astrometric_residuals.png (4882 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 01:38:34.67 -01:41:57.8: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 01:55:11.10 +01:26:26.1: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 01:21:32.91 -00:04:33.3: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 01:21:32.91 -00:04:33.3: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 01:38:34.67 -01:41:57.8: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 01:55:11.10 +01:26:26.1: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:32.91 -00:04:33.3: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1777 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20292.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20302.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20292_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
Preparing report for the candidate 20292_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20302_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
Preparing report for the candidate 20302_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20460_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 20460_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00199_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 00199_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:30:38.40 +02:52:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
01:55:11.10 +01:26:26.1
01:38:34.67 -01:41:57.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:43:00.023 -01:58:47.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:42:50.074 -02:00:59.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:43:00.023 -01:58:47.42
Second-epoch image center 01:42:50.074 -02:00:59.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0553 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:42:50.622 -02:01:25.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:43:00.023 -01:58:47.42
Second-epoch image center 01:42:50.622 -02:01:25.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0588 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:42:50.074 -02:00:59.30
Second-epoch second image center 01:42:50.622 -02:01:25.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00755 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pUedilqTt0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits &> /tmp/tmp.O9AaHvR47R
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits &> /tmp/tmp.s8gZHtoFoi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WQNifbJF8x
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits and wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits and wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits and wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 31778 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.8476 to 33.6869 deg, Dec -7.2828 to +3.3396 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.8476 to 33.6869 deg, Dec -7.2828 to 3.3396 deg
Loaded 4102 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3266 out of 3563 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3563 out of 31778 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.795000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.795000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 31778 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.8476 to 33.6869 deg, Dec -7.2828 to +3.3396 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.8476 to 33.6869 deg, Dec -7.2828 to 3.3396 deg
Loaded 4102 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3266 out of 3563 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3563 out of 31778 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 31614 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.8341 to 33.6849 deg, Dec -7.2951 to +3.3303 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.8341 to 33.6849 deg, Dec -7.2951 to 3.3303 deg
Loaded 4106 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3278 out of 3571 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3571 out of 31614 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 160 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
1.9 pix Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
15.4 mag. Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.pUedilqTt0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1245, bad_region=1, passed=31770
Got 31770 stars (including 30476 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31770 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31770 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31770 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31770 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5390)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.253 n_q1=1275 n_q2=1207 n_q3=1258 n_q4=1160 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.262
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits -region wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.O9AaHvR47R (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1210, bad_region=3, passed=31600
Got 31600 stars (including 30334 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31600 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31600 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31600 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31600 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4901 stars left (next iteration limit 5391)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits N_match=4901 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.255 n_q1=1283 n_q2=1199 n_q3=1263 n_q4=1156 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.247
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits -region wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.s8gZHtoFoi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=989, bad_region=37, passed=27569
Got 27569 stars (including 26514 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27569 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5379)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=10.700 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.004 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=0.340 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.351 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=0.240 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.260 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4890 robust_rms_before=0.980 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.236 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.240 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.266 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.260
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.266 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.241 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.248 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.224 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.217 n_q1=1186 n_q2=1198 n_q3=1238 n_q4=1268 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.166
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WQNifbJF8x (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=985, bad_region=38, passed=27974
Got 27974 stars (including 26917 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27974 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4888 stars left (next iteration limit 5376)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=10.667 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.955 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=0.372 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.397 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=0.270 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.275 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4888 robust_rms_before=0.989 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.262 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.270 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.272 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.275
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.272 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits N_match=4888 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.263 n_q1=1183 n_q2=1197 n_q3=1243 n_q4=1265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.027
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0410.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_044710_TTUQ1b1x1_3095167_19TsRtsH/wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 01:47:20.23 +01:36:58.6: 14.71 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 01:36:14.60 -00:45:50.3: 14.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 01:30:58.69 +00:53:25.5: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 01:35:33.01 -04:58:12.0: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 01:27:24.86 +02:17:07.1: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 02:13:02.81 -00:20:02.0: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 01:36:14.60 -00:45:50.3: 14.24 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 01:47:20.23 +01:36:58.6: 14.73 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:36:14.60 -00:45:50.3: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4323 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:47:20.23 +01:36:58.6: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5931 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 01:30:58.69 +00:53:25.5: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:30:58.69 +00:53:25.5: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7729 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 01:35:33.01 -04:58:12.0: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 01:27:24.86 +02:17:07.1: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 02:13:02.81 -00:20:02.0: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 01:47:09.93 +01:32:43.2: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 01:20:06.56 +01:52:55.5: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 01:47:09.93 +01:32:43.2: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 01:27:45.81 -01:52:31.3: 15.13 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 01:20:06.56 +01:52:55.5: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 01:12:35.14 -02:21:52.4: 14.76 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 01:27:45.81 -01:52:31.3: 14.82 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:27:45.81 -01:52:31.3: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5770 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 01:12:35.14 -02:21:52.4: 14.95 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 01:18:51.63 -04:23:15.6: 14.51 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:12:35.14 -02:21:52.4: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6106 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 01:26:41.42 -00:21:10.7: 15.08 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 01:18:51.63 -04:23:15.6: 14.57 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:51.63 -04:23:15.6: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4269 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 01:26:41.42 -00:21:10.7: 15.07 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:26:41.42 -00:21:10.7: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7207 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 01:18:33.55 -03:44:44.3: 15.22 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 01:37:42.63 +01:16:20.0: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 01:18:33.55 -03:44:44.3: 15.06 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:33.55 -03:44:44.3: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6657 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 01:37:42.63 +01:16:20.0: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 01:15:50.70 -00:42:22.2: 14.97 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 01:15:50.70 -00:42:22.2: 15.12 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 01:27:58.69 -06:33:57.6: 15.11 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:15:50.70 -00:42:22.2: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8294 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 01:27:58.69 -06:33:57.6: 14.86 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:27:58.69 -06:33:57.6: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7660 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 02:07:02.66 -04:17:19.0: 14.72 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 02:07:02.66 -04:17:19.0: 14.81 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:07:02.66 -04:17:19.0: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5904 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52325.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52352.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52364.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52769.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52786.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52968.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51971_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 51971_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51975_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 51975_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51984_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 51984_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:55:11.10 +01:26:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51994_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 51994_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:38:34.67 -01:41:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52046_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52046_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52088_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52088_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52122_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52122_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52186_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52186_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52191_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52191_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52213_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52213_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52218_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52218_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52227_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52227_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52236_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52236_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52251_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52251_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52264_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52264_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52303_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52303_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52304_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52304_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52311_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52311_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52325_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
Preparing report for the candidate 52325_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52332_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52332_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52345_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52345_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52350_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52350_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52352_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
Preparing report for the candidate 52352_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52359_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52359_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52364_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
Preparing report for the candidate 52364_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52367_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52367_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52369_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52369_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52372_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52372_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52376_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52376_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52377_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52377_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52394_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52394_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52400_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52400_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52410_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52410_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52414_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52414_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52432_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52432_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52435_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52435_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52438_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52438_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52450_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52450_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52451_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52451_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52455_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52455_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52461_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52461_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52468_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52468_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52492_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52492_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52496_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52496_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52510_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52510_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52511_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52511_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52519_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52519_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52525_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52525_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52536_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52536_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52539_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52539_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52545_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52545_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52551_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52551_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52552_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52552_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52553_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52553_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52557_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52557_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52563_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52563_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52572_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52572_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52576_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52576_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52578_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52578_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52589_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52589_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52597_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52597_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52612_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52612_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52615_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52615_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52620_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52620_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52623_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52623_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52625_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52625_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52637_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52637_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52641_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52641_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:32:56.20 +00:06:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52646_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52646_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52656_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52656_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52660_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52660_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52666_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52666_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52668_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52668_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52671_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52671_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52682_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52682_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52685_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52685_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52687_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52687_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52690_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52690_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52700_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52700_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52702_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52702_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52708_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52708_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52723_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52723_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52737_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52737_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52743_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52743_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52755_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52755_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52767_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52767_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52769_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
Preparing report for the candidate 52769_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52781_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52781_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52782_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52782_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52786_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
Preparing report for the candidate 52786_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52800_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52800_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52802_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52802_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52805_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52805_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52808_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52808_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52810_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52810_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52814_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52814_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52820_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52820_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52823_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52823_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52824_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52824_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52830_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52830_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52831_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52831_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52833_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52833_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52844_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52844_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52848_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52848_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52851_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52851_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52855_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52855_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52858_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52858_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52859_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52859_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52867_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52867_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52880_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52880_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52882_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52882_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52884_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52884_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52886_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52886_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52896_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52896_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52900_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52900_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52903_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52903_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52915_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52915_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52916_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52916_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:15:36.92 -06:35:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52924_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52924_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52927_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52927_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52935_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52935_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52943_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52943_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52944_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52944_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52949_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52949_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52951_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52951_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52956_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52956_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52962_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52962_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52963_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52963_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52968_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
Preparing report for the candidate 52968_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52969_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52969_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52975_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52975_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52977_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52977_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52978_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52978_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52979_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52979_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52981_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52981_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52983_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52983_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52990_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52990_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52992_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52992_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52993_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52993_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52994_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 52994_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53003_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 53003_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53004_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 53004_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53005_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 53005_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53006_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 53006_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53008_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 53008_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53012_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 53012_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53013_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 53013_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53017_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 53017_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53018_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 53018_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53025_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 53025_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53034_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 53034_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53037_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 53037_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53038_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 53038_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53039_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 53039_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53040_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 53040_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53046_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 53046_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53048_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 53048_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53054_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 53054_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53064_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 53064_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00584_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411
The candidate 00584_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-45-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0411 did not pass the final checks
