This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_042351_TTUQ1b1x1_1123924_z5Tiq6Ge
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.8908,6.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.3908 6.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.8908,8.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.3908 8.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.3908 2461271.8908 9.40 00:41:11.90 +05:46:32.9
118.25160 -57.00286 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.192 Nausikaa -0 1 1 9.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:41:11.90 +05:46:32.9: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:41:11.90 +05:46:32.9: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.8908,9.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.3908 9.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.8908,12.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.3908 12.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.8908,7.17,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.3908 7.17CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.8908,8.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.3908 8.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.8908,12.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.3908 12.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.3908 2461271.8908 13.84 00:43:47.62 +08:39:36.9
119.70389 -54.16358 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.577 Rhea -0 -0 0 14.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:43:47.62 +08:39:36.9: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:43:47.62 +08:39:36.9: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.8908,13.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.3908 13.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.3908 2461271.8908 14.16 00:30:21.20 +03:09:32.3
112.58487 -59.28853 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.8" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.551 Ortrud 2 -0 2 14.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:30:21.20 +03:09:32.3: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:30:21.20 +03:09:32.3: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.8908,14.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.3908 14.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.90247090 21.07.2026 09:39:23.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
First image: 2461242.90247090 21.07.2026 09:39:23.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Last image: 2461271.89115747 19.08.2026 09:23:06.005 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_042351_TTUQ1b1x1_1123924_z5Tiq6Ge/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 15
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6826
Objects passed selection criteria: 6819
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6260.25
Average stars matched: 5841 (93.303 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233296 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 19 04:26:00 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.90247090 21.07.2026 09:39:23.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
First image: 2461242.90247090 21.07.2026 09:39:23.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Last image: 2461271.89115747 19.08.2026 09:23:06.005 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_042351_TTUQ1b1x1_1123924_z5Tiq6Ge/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 142
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 14 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 30073
Objects passed selection criteria: 29996
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 28478.5
Average stars matched: 27180.8 (95.4431 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 253480 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 19 04:27:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_042351_TTUQ1b1x1_1123924_z5Tiq6Ge/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_042351_TTUQ1b1x1_1123924_z5Tiq6Ge/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_042351_TTUQ1b1x1_1123924_z5Tiq6Ge/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_042351_TTUQ1b1x1_1123924_z5Tiq6Ge/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461271.89045780
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:26.391 +05:59:58.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:42.673 +06:00:55.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:26.391 +05:59:58.81
Second-epoch image center 00:51:42.673 +06:00:55.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0693 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:45.509 +06:01:27.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:26.391 +05:59:58.81
Second-epoch image center 00:51:45.509 +06:01:27.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0829 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:51:42.673 +06:00:55.07
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:45.509 +06:01:27.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01476 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0JRMHFsSpu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits &> /tmp/tmp.u53662gE3N
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_042351_TTUQ1b1x1_1123924_z5Tiq6Ge/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Bg5myxf1VG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_042351_TTUQ1b1x1_1123924_z5Tiq6Ge/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_042351_TTUQ1b1x1_1123924_z5Tiq6Ge/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YuWgPWvQFR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_042351_TTUQ1b1x1_1123924_z5Tiq6Ge/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5718 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8579 to 20.7702 deg, Dec +0.6752 to +11.2667 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8579 to 20.7702 deg, Dec 0.6752 to 11.2667 deg
Loaded 4455 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3613 out of 3699 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3699 out of 5718 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.625400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.625400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5718 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8579 to 20.7702 deg, Dec +0.6752 to +11.2667 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8579 to 20.7702 deg, Dec 0.6752 to 11.2667 deg
Loaded 4455 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3613 out of 3699 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3699 out of 5718 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 5640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8902 to 20.7787 deg, Dec +0.7135 to +11.2815 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8902 to 20.7787 deg, Dec 0.7135 to 11.2815 deg
Loaded 4441 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3584 out of 3667 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3667 out of 5640 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 15 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
2.3 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
3.6 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
3.6 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
15.0 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.0JRMHFsSpu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_042351_TTUQ1b1x1_1123924_z5Tiq6Ge/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=319, bad_region=0, passed=5718
Got 5718 stars (including 5395 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5718 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4907 stars left (next iteration limit 5397)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits N_match=4907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.335 n_q1=1254 n_q2=1243 n_q3=1220 n_q4=1190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.118
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.u53662gE3N (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_042351_TTUQ1b1x1_1123924_z5Tiq6Ge/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=319, bad_region=0, passed=5640
Got 5640 stars (including 5317 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5640 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4908 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits N_match=4908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.393 n_q1=1266 n_q2=1252 n_q3=1219 n_q4=1171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.093
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Bg5myxf1VG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_042351_TTUQ1b1x1_1123924_z5Tiq6Ge/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_042351_TTUQ1b1x1_1123924_z5Tiq6Ge/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_042351_TTUQ1b1x1_1123924_z5Tiq6Ge/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_042351_TTUQ1b1x1_1123924_z5Tiq6Ge/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_042351_TTUQ1b1x1_1123924_z5Tiq6Ge/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_042351_TTUQ1b1x1_1123924_z5Tiq6Ge/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_042351_TTUQ1b1x1_1123924_z5Tiq6Ge/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_042351_TTUQ1b1x1_1123924_z5Tiq6Ge/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=258, bad_region=0, passed=6884
Got 6884 stars (including 6617 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6884 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4917 stars left (next iteration limit 5407)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4917 robust_rms=10.057 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.864 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4917 robust_rms=0.353 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.363 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4917 robust_rms=0.283 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.313 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4917 robust_rms_before=0.859 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.280 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.283 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.324 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.313
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.324 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits N_match=4917 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.247 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.243 n_q1=1281 n_q2=1215 n_q3=1256 n_q4=1165 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.154
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_042351_TTUQ1b1x1_1123924_z5Tiq6Ge/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YuWgPWvQFR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_042351_TTUQ1b1x1_1123924_z5Tiq6Ge/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_042351_TTUQ1b1x1_1123924_z5Tiq6Ge/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_042351_TTUQ1b1x1_1123924_z5Tiq6Ge/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_042351_TTUQ1b1x1_1123924_z5Tiq6Ge/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_042351_TTUQ1b1x1_1123924_z5Tiq6Ge/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_042351_TTUQ1b1x1_1123924_z5Tiq6Ge/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_042351_TTUQ1b1x1_1123924_z5Tiq6Ge/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_042351_TTUQ1b1x1_1123924_z5Tiq6Ge/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=260, bad_region=0, passed=6950
Got 6950 stars (including 6687 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6950 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4917 stars left (next iteration limit 5408)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4917 robust_rms=10.265 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.720 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4917 robust_rms=0.345 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.359 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4917 robust_rms=0.283 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.315 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4917 robust_rms_before=0.857 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.279 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.283 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.320 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.315
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.320 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits N_match=4917 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.253 n_q1=1279 n_q2=1223 n_q3=1258 n_q4=1157 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.190
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_042351_TTUQ1b1x1_1123924_z5Tiq6Ge/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits sigma_overall=0.327 worst_q_ratio=1.118
ref2=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits sigma_overall=0.389 worst_q_ratio=1.093
new1=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits sigma_overall=0.279 worst_q_ratio=1.154
new2=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits sigma_overall=0.285 worst_q_ratio=1.190
reference average sigma_overall=0.358 worst_q_ratio=1.1055
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967_astrometric_residuals.png (4907 matched stars from wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968_astrometric_residuals.png (4908 matched stars from wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388_astrometric_residuals.png (4917 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389_astrometric_residuals.png (4917 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_042351_TTUQ1b1x1_1123924_z5Tiq6Ge/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-22-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0388.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_042351_TTUQ1b1x1_1123924_z5Tiq6Ge/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:07:08.35 +05:12:39.5: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:58:17.63 +06:49:18.8: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:41:11.90 +05:46:32.9: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:53:38.68 +06:06:31.4: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:48:30.83 +05:48:31.2: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:49:06.92 +05:59:29.2: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:38:22.28 +08:36:54.2: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:43:41.91 +06:37:16.6: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:49:06.92 +05:59:29.2: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:38:22.28 +08:36:54.2: 12.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:58:17.63 +06:49:18.8: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:49:06.92 +05:59:29.2: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1039 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:38:22.28 +08:36:54.2: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0823 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:58:17.63 +06:49:18.8: ref_mag=12.03 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0171 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:53:38.68 +06:06:31.4: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:07:08.35 +05:12:39.5: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:53:38.68 +06:06:31.4: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0593 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:48:30.83 +05:48:31.2: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:07:08.35 +05:12:39.5: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0951 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:41:11.90 +05:46:32.9: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:48:30.83 +05:48:31.2: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0679 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:43:41.91 +06:37:16.6: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:43:41.91 +06:37:16.6: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0790 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 01:07:35.98 +07:49:01.0: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:30:08.26 +04:52:55.0: 12.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-39-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0967.fits at 00:51:12.05 +05:52:34.8: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 01:07:35.98 +07:49:01.0: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:30:08.26 +04:52:55.0: 12.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:07:35.98 +07:49:01.0: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1489 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-40-22_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0968.fits at 00:51:12.05 +05:52:34.8: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.08 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:08.26 +04:52:55.0: ref_mag=12.08 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1191 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:51:12.05 +05:52:34.8: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1850 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20213.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20192_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20192_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:25:34.92 +10:30:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20193_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 20193_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20201_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 20201_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20213_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 20213_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20342_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20342_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20346_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20346_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20348_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20348_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20350_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20350_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20354_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20354_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20355_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20355_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20361_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20361_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20362_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20362_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20366_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 20366_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20367_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20367_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20369_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 20369_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32453_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 32453_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32454_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 32454_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32457_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 32457_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32458_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 32458_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32470_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 32470_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:13:49.38 +00:53:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32473_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 32473_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32475_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 32475_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32476_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 32476_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32486_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 32486_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32496_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 32496_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:41:11.90 +05:46:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32638_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 32638_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32651_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 32651_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32655_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 32655_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32698_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 32698_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32728_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 32728_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32909_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 32909_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32936_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 32936_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33082_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 33082_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33100_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33100_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33106_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33106_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:21:24.62 +09:00:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33127_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33127_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33200_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33200_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33208_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33208_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33209_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33209_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33212_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33212_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33213_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33213_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33215_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33215_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33218_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33218_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33237_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33237_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33245_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33245_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33258_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33258_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33260_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33260_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33265_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33265_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33270_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33270_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33275_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33275_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33278_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33278_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33298_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33298_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33302_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33302_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33305_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33305_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33307_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33307_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33322_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33322_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33327_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33327_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33338_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
Preparing report for the candidate 33338_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33341_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33341_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33342_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33342_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33348_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33348_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:12:54.09 +01:26:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33361_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33361_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33362_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33362_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33373_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33373_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33383_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33383_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33384_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33384_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33395_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33395_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33396_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33396_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33400_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33400_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33412_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33412_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33413_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33413_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33422_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33422_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33430_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33430_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33444_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33444_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33450_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33450_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33453_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33453_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33454_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33454_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33460_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33460_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33465_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33465_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33468_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33468_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33471_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33471_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33472_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33472_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33474_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33474_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33484_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33484_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33496_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33496_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33497_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33497_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33503_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33503_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33509_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33509_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33512_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33512_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33518_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33518_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33519_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33519_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33520_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33520_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33521_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33521_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33529_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33529_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33532_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33532_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33534_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33534_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33538_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33538_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33539_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33539_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33546_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33546_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33560_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33560_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33561_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33561_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33562_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33562_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33568_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33568_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33569_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33569_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33575_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33575_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33576_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33576_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33577_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33577_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33581_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33581_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33583_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33583_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33585_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33585_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33590_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33590_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33603_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33603_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33604_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33604_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33606_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33606_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33614_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33614_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33618_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33618_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33619_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33619_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33620_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33620_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33627_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33627_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33628_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33628_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33629_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33629_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33634_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33634_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33635_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33635_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33640_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33640_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33642_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33642_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33643_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33643_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33662_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33662_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33663_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33663_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33664_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33664_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33666_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33666_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33668_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33668_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33676_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33676_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33685_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33685_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33690_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33690_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33734_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33734_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33735_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33735_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33752_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33752_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33783_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389
The candidate 33783_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-23-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0389 did not pass the final checks
