This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.3744 2461271.8744 12.13 01:49:41.92 +17:29:47.5
142.13866 -43.19184 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 3.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.101 Helena -1 -1 1 12.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:49:41.92 +17:29:47.5: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:49:41.92 +17:29:47.5: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 19.3744* 01 49 41.92 +17 29 47.5 12.1 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.8744,12.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.3744 12.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.3744 2461271.8744 12.29 02:06:44.21 +12:26:49.5
150.12522 -46.41074 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 3.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.46 Hestia -0 -0 0 12.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 02:06:44.21 +12:26:49.5: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 02:06:44.21 +12:26:49.5: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 19.3744* 02 06 44.21 +12 26 49.5 12.3 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.8744,12.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.3744 12.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.3744 2461271.8744 12.75 01:46:48.72 +10:54:55.1
144.21072 -49.65486 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 3.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.124 Alkeste -0 -0 0 12.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:46:48.72 +10:54:55.1: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:46:48.72 +10:54:55.1: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 19.3744* 01 46 48.72 +10 54 55.1 12.8 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.8744,12.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.3744 12.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.3744 2461271.8744 13.23 01:42:39.53 +15:33:10.6
140.68314 -45.54599 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 3.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.212 Medea -0 -0 0 13.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:42:39.53 +15:33:10.6: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:42:39.53 +15:33:10.6: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.8744,13.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.3744 13.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.3744 2461271.8744 14.05 01:54:54.26 +10:28:55.3
147.31161 -49.36188 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 3.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.167 Urda -0 -0 1 14.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:54:54.26 +10:28:55.3: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:54:54.26 +10:28:55.3: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.8744,14.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.3744 14.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.3744 2461271.8744 14.28 01:38:39.65 +14:43:20.3
139.67258 -46.60876 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 3.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.517 Edith -0 -0 0 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:38:39.65 +14:43:20.3: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:38:39.65 +14:43:20.3: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.8744,14.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.3744 14.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.3744 2461271.8744 14.13 01:51:13.72 +15:13:52.0
143.62451 -45.22480 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 3.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.295 Theresia 0 0 0 14.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:51:13.72 +15:13:52.0: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:51:13.72 +15:13:52.0: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 19.3744* 01 51 13.72 +15 13 52.0 14.1 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.8744,14.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.3744 14.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.3744 2461271.8744 14.53 01:53:31.64 +12:46:24.8
145.58837 -47.34838 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 3.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1572 Posnania -0 -1 1 14.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:53:31.64 +12:46:24.8: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:53:31.64 +12:46:24.8: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 19.3744* 01 53 31.64 +12 46 24.8 14.5 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.8744,14.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.3744 14.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.3744 2461271.8744 14.38 01:47:54.24 +12:20:46.8
143.88227 -48.21514 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 3.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1317 Silvretta -0 -0 0 14.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:47:54.24 +12:20:46.8: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:47:54.24 +12:20:46.8: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 19.3744* 01 47 54.24 +12 20 46.8 14.4 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.8744,14.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.3744 14.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.3744 2461271.8744 14.47 01:54:30.13 +13:46:45.9
145.39720 -46.32324 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 3.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.147 Protogeneia 0 -0 0 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:54:30.13 +13:46:45.9: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:54:30.13 +13:46:45.9: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 19.3744* 01 54 30.13 +13 46 45.9 14.5 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.8744,14.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.3744 14.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.69490819 23.12.2025 04:40:30.068 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
First image: 2461032.69490819 23.12.2025 04:40:30.068 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Last image: 2461271.87468884 19.08.2026 08:59:23.116 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 15
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 15 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7803
Objects passed selection criteria: 7798
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7377.75
Average stars matched: 7187.25 (97.4179 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233772 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 19 04:05:49 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.69490819 23.12.2025 04:40:30.068 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
First image: 2461032.69490819 23.12.2025 04:40:30.068 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Last image: 2461271.87468884 19.08.2026 08:59:23.116 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 209
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 28 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 38733
Objects passed selection criteria: 38650
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 36424.8
Average stars matched: 35589.8 (97.7076 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 259984 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 19 04:07:33 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461271.87415369
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:39.869 +14:00:12.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:51.079 +14:01:00.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:46:39.869 +14:00:12.31
Second-epoch image center 01:46:51.079 +14:01:00.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0473 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:50.046 +14:01:14.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:46:39.869 +14:00:12.31
Second-epoch image center 01:46:50.046 +14:01:14.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0446 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:46:51.079 +14:01:00.95
Second-epoch second image center 01:46:50.046 +14:01:14.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00559 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits &> /tmp/tmp.y8IIvXgXQ7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DEXWR9Vqne
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Sd4n6ACdfb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oQAFPnJjJj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits and wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits and wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits and wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7679 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.3962 to 34.9286 deg, Dec +8.6498 to +19.2740 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.3962 to 34.9286 deg, Dec 8.6498 to 19.2740 deg
Loaded 4730 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3851 out of 4065 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4065 out of 7679 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.950100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.950100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7679 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.3962 to 34.9286 deg, Dec +8.6498 to +19.2740 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.3962 to 34.9286 deg, Dec 8.6498 to 19.2740 deg
Loaded 4730 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3851 out of 4065 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4065 out of 7679 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 6762 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.4566 to 34.9567 deg, Dec +8.6053 to +19.2739 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.4566 to 34.9567 deg, Dec 8.6053 to 19.2739 deg
Loaded 4732 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3812 out of 4016 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4016 out of 6762 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 15 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
2.0 pix Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
3.0 pix fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
3.0 pix fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
15.2 mag. Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.y8IIvXgXQ7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=549, bad_region=0, passed=7679
Got 7679 stars (including 7121 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7679 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4876 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.21"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.21"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22"
Excluding outliers - 4873 stars left (next iteration limit 5359)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits N_match=4873 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.237 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.223 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.217 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.200 n_q1=1261 n_q2=1216 n_q3=1199 n_q4=1197 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.365
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits -region wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DEXWR9Vqne (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=519, bad_region=0, passed=6762
Got 6762 stars (including 6236 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6762 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6762 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6762 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6762 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4878 stars left (next iteration limit 5365)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits N_match=4878 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.239 n_q1=1250 n_q2=1227 n_q3=1200 n_q4=1201 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.449
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits -region wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Sd4n6ACdfb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=374, bad_region=0, passed=7624
Got 7624 stars (including 7242 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7624 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7624 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7624 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7624 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4878 stars left (next iteration limit 5366)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=10.596 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.830 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=0.342 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.361 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=0.262 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.299 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4878 robust_rms_before=0.909 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.257 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.262 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.303 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.299
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.303 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits N_match=4878 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.237 n_q1=1202 n_q2=1168 n_q3=1235 n_q4=1273 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.218
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oQAFPnJjJj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=373, bad_region=0, passed=7617
Got 7617 stars (including 7237 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7617 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7617 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7617 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7617 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4878 stars left (next iteration limit 5365)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=10.611 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.851 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=0.339 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.360 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=0.262 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.299 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4878 robust_rms_before=0.933 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.260 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.262 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.302 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.299
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.302 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits N_match=4878 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.259 n_q1=1206 n_q2=1172 n_q3=1233 n_q4=1267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.185
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits sigma_overall=0.237 worst_q_ratio=1.365
ref2=Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits sigma_overall=0.294 worst_q_ratio=1.449
new1=fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits sigma_overall=0.257 worst_q_ratio=1.218
new2=fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits sigma_overall=0.264 worst_q_ratio=1.185
reference average sigma_overall=0.2655 worst_q_ratio=1.407
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188_astrometric_residuals.png (4873 matched stars from wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.21 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139_astrometric_residuals.png (4878 matched stars from wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366_astrometric_residuals.png (4878 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367_astrometric_residuals.png (4878 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 02:04:15.29 +11:14:08.7: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:33:27.47 +17:34:09.2: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:19:39.46 +18:34:21.3: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:52:16.01 +15:47:07.9: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:40:33.23 +13:21:15.8: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:17:32.58 +14:15:31.9: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:57:53.89 +14:23:11.3: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:49:41.92 +17:29:47.5: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 02:06:44.21 +12:26:49.5: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:51:34.80 +14:41:59.2: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 02:06:44.21 +12:26:49.5: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:33:27.47 +17:34:09.2: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:52:16.01 +15:47:07.9: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:17:32.58 +14:15:31.9: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:49:41.92 +17:29:47.5: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:40:33.23 +13:21:15.8: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 02:04:15.29 +11:14:08.7: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:33:27.47 +17:34:09.2: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3607 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:32.58 +14:15:31.9: ref_mag=11.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7180 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.88 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:04:15.29 +11:14:08.7: ref_mag=11.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1671 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:52:16.01 +15:47:07.9: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4231 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:40:33.23 +13:21:15.8: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3971 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:57:53.89 +14:23:11.3: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:19:39.46 +18:34:21.3: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:57:53.89 +14:23:11.3: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3959 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:39.46 +18:34:21.3: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4130 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:51:34.80 +14:41:59.2: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:51:34.80 +14:41:59.2: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4386 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:42:57.89 +16:10:54.3: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:48:25.45 +14:14:33.9: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:46:28.14 +14:04:49.4: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:42:57.89 +16:10:54.3: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:48:25.45 +14:14:33.9: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:48:25.45 +14:14:33.9: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4559 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:42:57.89 +16:10:54.3: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4404 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:46:28.14 +14:04:49.4: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:46:28.14 +14:04:49.4: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4507 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20216.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20235.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20094_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20094_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20192_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20192_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20216_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
Preparing report for the candidate 20216_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20219_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20219_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20235_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
Preparing report for the candidate 20235_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20238_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20238_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:10:13.48 +11:31:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20253_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20253_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20256_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20256_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20257_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20257_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20265_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20265_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20266_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20266_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20267_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20267_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20268_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20268_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20269_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 20269_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04646_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 04646_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:22:58.49 +12:52:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 14s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Psc-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
01:49:41.92 +17:29:47.5
02:06:44.21 +12:26:49.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:39.869 +14:00:12.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:51.079 +14:01:00.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:46:39.869 +14:00:12.31
Second-epoch image center 01:46:51.079 +14:01:00.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0473 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:50.046 +14:01:14.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:46:39.869 +14:00:12.31
Second-epoch image center 01:46:50.046 +14:01:14.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0446 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:46:51.079 +14:01:00.95
Second-epoch second image center 01:46:50.046 +14:01:14.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00559 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hdDwNqgkN3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tPRzk8TRwX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QKzCvK0Oya
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qVrkloKIel
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits and wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits and wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits and wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 40639 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.3962 to 34.9791 deg, Dec +8.6321 to +19.2912 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.3962 to 34.9791 deg, Dec 8.6321 to 19.2912 deg
Loaded 4752 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3678 out of 4107 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4107 out of 40639 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.860050
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.860050
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 40639 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.3962 to 34.9791 deg, Dec +8.6321 to +19.2912 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.3962 to 34.9791 deg, Dec 8.6321 to 19.2912 deg
Loaded 4752 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3678 out of 4107 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4107 out of 40639 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 38153 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.4016 to 34.9977 deg, Dec +8.5904 to +19.2796 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.4016 to 34.9977 deg, Dec 8.5904 to 19.2796 deg
Loaded 4774 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3712 out of 4109 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4109 out of 38153 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 188 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
1.9 pix Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
2.8 pix fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
2.8 pix fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
15.4 mag. Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.hdDwNqgkN3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1873, bad_region=4, passed=40626
Got 40626 stars (including 38681 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40626 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.21"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40626 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.21"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40626 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.21"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40626 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Excluding outliers - 4878 stars left (next iteration limit 5365)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits N_match=4878 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.229 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.218 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.217 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.197 n_q1=1241 n_q2=1253 n_q3=1190 n_q4=1194 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.309
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits -region wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tPRzk8TRwX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1585, bad_region=24, passed=38135
Got 38135 stars (including 36454 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38135 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38135 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38135 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38135 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.238 n_q1=1246 n_q2=1250 n_q3=1199 n_q4=1186 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.439
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits -region wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QKzCvK0Oya (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1281, bad_region=35, passed=33945
Got 33945 stars (including 32587 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33945 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4877 stars left (next iteration limit 5364)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=10.574 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.055 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=0.341 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.358 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4877 robust_rms=0.263 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.294 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4877 robust_rms_before=0.908 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.257 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.263 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.292 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.294
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.292 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits N_match=4877 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.237 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.239 n_q1=1200 n_q2=1151 n_q3=1264 n_q4=1262 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.176
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qVrkloKIel (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1265, bad_region=36, passed=33929
Got 33929 stars (including 32600 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33929 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4879 stars left (next iteration limit 5366)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=10.605 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.349 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.344 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.361 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.261 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.294 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4879 robust_rms_before=0.932 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.262 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.261 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.296 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.294
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.296 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits N_match=4879 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.240 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.259 n_q1=1204 n_q2=1154 n_q3=1255 n_q4=1266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-58-36_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0366.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_040142_TTUQ1b1x1_3363938_DPhlfDnz/wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:28:00.95 +17:49:35.0: 14.56 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:19:16.28 +18:44:26.6: 14.43 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:25:45.83 +14:00:58.9: 14.48 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:19:58.34 +14:42:24.5: 14.72 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:51:23.92 +11:30:52.1: 14.56 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:45:01.32 +09:05:28.8: 14.69 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 02:05:49.09 +18:38:38.6: 14.99 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:42:16.93 +18:45:05.7: 14.39 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:45:01.32 +09:05:28.8: 14.63 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:51:23.92 +11:30:52.1: 14.55 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:42:16.93 +18:45:05.7: 14.54 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:45:01.32 +09:05:28.8: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7784 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:19:16.28 +18:44:26.6: 14.36 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 02:05:49.09 +18:38:38.6: 14.85 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:28:00.95 +17:49:35.0: 14.46 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:19:58.34 +14:42:24.5: 14.79 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:25:45.83 +14:00:58.9: 15.00 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:51:23.92 +11:30:52.1: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4273 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:42:16.93 +18:45:05.7: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5988 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:05:49.09 +18:38:38.6: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5646 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:28:00.95 +17:49:35.0: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4613 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:25:45.83 +14:00:58.9: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6464 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:16.28 +18:44:26.6: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5213 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:58.34 +14:42:24.5: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4874 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:42:39.53 +15:33:10.6: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:46:48.72 +10:54:55.1: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:46:48.72 +10:54:55.1: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:42:39.53 +15:33:10.6: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:54:54.26 +10:28:55.3: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 02:01:36.22 +14:32:26.9: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:38:39.65 +14:43:20.3: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:54:54.26 +10:28:55.3: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:51:13.72 +15:13:52.0: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 02:01:36.22 +14:32:26.9: 14.18 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:01:36.22 +14:32:26.9: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1157 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:38:39.65 +14:43:20.3: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:51:13.72 +15:13:52.0: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:53:08.49 +16:27:44.2: 14.14 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:53:08.49 +16:27:44.2: 14.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:53:08.49 +16:27:44.2: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3543 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:53:31.64 +12:46:24.8: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:22:27.37 +12:19:19.6: 14.75 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:53:31.64 +12:46:24.8: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:22:27.37 +12:19:19.6: 14.68 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:22:27.37 +12:19:19.6: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5222 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:47:54.24 +12:20:46.8: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:24:14.91 +12:53:38.7: 14.67 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:54:30.13 +13:46:45.9: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:47:54.24 +12:20:46.8: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:24:14.91 +12:53:38.7: 14.85 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:54:30.13 +13:46:45.9: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:24:14.91 +12:53:38.7: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4566 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:19:52.85 +12:54:20.5: 14.81 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:19:52.85 +12:54:20.5: 15.21 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:52.85 +12:54:20.5: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6156 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:30:25.17 +16:56:06.5: 14.85 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:30:25.17 +16:56:06.5: 14.90 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:30:25.17 +16:56:06.5: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6871 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:18:15.79 +12:24:35.9: 15.37 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:18:15.79 +12:24:35.9: 15.20 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:15.79 +12:24:35.9: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6995 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:15:16.71 +14:36:22.2: 14.70 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:18:14.83 +18:59:06.8: 15.09 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:17:30.13 +12:31:04.7: 15.05 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:15:16.71 +14:36:22.2: 14.50 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:15:16.71 +14:36:22.2: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5423 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:16:01.01 +16:03:29.7: 15.08 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:18:14.83 +18:59:06.8: 15.17 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:21:30.61 +16:12:49.9: 15.01 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:14.83 +18:59:06.8: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7479 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:16:01.01 +16:03:29.7: 14.94 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:16:01.01 +16:03:29.7: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7761 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:17:30.13 +12:31:04.7: 15.06 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:30.13 +12:31:04.7: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7639 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:21:30.61 +16:12:49.9: 14.87 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:30.61 +16:12:49.9: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8626 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:20:53.32 +15:18:10.7: 15.31 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:22:08.75 +10:16:30.5: 14.95 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:22:32.61 +18:06:19.3: 14.93 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:18:26.34 +17:46:45.9: 15.29 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:17:51.06 +16:29:12.0: 14.91 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:24:52.84 +16:38:48.0: 15.24 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:20:53.32 +15:18:10.7: 15.35 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:53.32 +15:18:10.7: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7436 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:51:43.88 +17:44:25.8: 14.70 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:22:08.75 +10:16:30.5: 14.95 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:22:08.75 +10:16:30.5: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6529 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:15:34.37 +15:40:07.2: 14.95 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:17:51.06 +16:29:12.0: 14.92 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:18:26.34 +17:46:45.9: 15.00 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:51.06 +16:29:12.0: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7088 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:26.34 +17:46:45.9: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7957 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:22:32.61 +18:06:19.3: 15.03 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:51:43.88 +17:44:25.8: 14.99 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:24:52.84 +16:38:48.0: 15.25 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:15:34.37 +15:40:07.2: 14.94 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:43:00.60 +17:45:03.6: 15.22 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:22:32.61 +18:06:19.3: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6546 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:51:43.88 +17:44:25.8: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8369 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:24:52.84 +16:38:48.0: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7983 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:15:34.37 +15:40:07.2: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7769 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:20:31.24 +18:11:04.8: 14.97 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:43:00.60 +17:45:03.6: 15.36 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:43:00.60 +17:45:03.6: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9187 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:20:31.24 +18:11:04.8: 15.34 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:23:22.59 +15:59:09.4: 14.97 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:31.24 +18:11:04.8: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7765 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:41:22.12 +18:44:32.9: 14.92 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:17:32.13 +15:37:22.0: 15.41 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:22:01.24 +13:39:34.9: 15.26 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:23:34.06 +10:41:44.6: 14.87 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:23:22.59 +15:59:09.4: 15.35 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:41:22.12 +18:44:32.9: 15.01 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:41:22.12 +18:44:32.9: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7787 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:23:22.59 +15:59:09.4: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8961 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:22:01.24 +13:39:34.9: 15.44 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:22:01.24 +13:39:34.9: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9081 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:17:32.13 +15:37:22.0: 14.96 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:22:27.72 +18:01:20.1: 14.93 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:32.13 +15:37:22.0: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8441 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:17:47.61 +17:54:38.9: 15.01 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:23:34.06 +10:41:44.6: 15.19 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:23:34.06 +10:41:44.6: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7938 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:16:20.19 +15:19:06.3: 15.25 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:22:27.72 +18:01:20.1: 15.14 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:17:47.61 +17:54:38.9: 15.02 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:22:27.72 +18:01:20.1: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8257 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:47.61 +17:54:38.9: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6956 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:16:20.19 +15:19:06.3: 15.01 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:16:20.19 +15:19:06.3: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7535 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:24:21.46 +12:51:14.3: 15.16 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:17:33.75 +17:12:34.7: 15.25 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:19:18.12 +18:33:19.1: 14.81 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:19:59.62 +15:36:55.2: 15.41 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:18:39.10 +15:55:56.5: 15.29 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:24:01.46 +15:15:27.9: 15.21 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:17:04.58 +13:46:08.4: 15.20 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:33:44.32 +15:20:12.2: 15.35 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:24:21.46 +12:51:14.3: 15.01 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:18:39.10 +15:55:56.5: 15.64 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:19:59.62 +15:36:55.2: 15.10 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:19:18.12 +18:33:19.1: 14.98 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:17:33.75 +17:12:34.7: 15.50 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:24:21.46 +12:51:14.3: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8679 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:39.10 +15:55:56.5: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.8746 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:59.62 +15:36:55.2: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0154 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:18.12 +18:33:19.1: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6740 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:33.75 +17:12:34.7: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.0390 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:28:33.93 +17:50:29.0: 15.42 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:24:01.46 +15:15:27.9: 15.30 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:24:01.46 +15:15:27.9: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9911 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:17:04.58 +13:46:08.4: 15.34 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:04.58 +13:46:08.4: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7748 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:33:44.32 +15:20:12.2: 15.68 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.45 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:33:44.32 +15:20:12.2: ref_mag=15.45 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0283 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:28:33.93 +17:50:29.0: 15.27 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:28:33.93 +17:50:29.0: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0431 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:27:58.35 +16:45:53.1: 15.31 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:45:17.17 +15:16:20.4: 15.05 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:19:02.99 +15:19:32.4: 15.13 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:26:12.47 +14:22:52.2: 15.53 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:27:37.83 +10:58:49.5: 15.01 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:45:17.17 +15:16:20.4: 15.06 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:45:17.17 +15:16:20.4: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9227 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:27:58.35 +16:45:53.1: 14.91 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 02:03:48.70 +17:01:39.0: 15.78 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:19:02.99 +15:19:32.4: 15.09 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:27:58.35 +16:45:53.1: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9530 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:26:12.47 +14:22:52.2: 15.63 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:02.99 +15:19:32.4: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0850 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.57 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:26:12.47 +14:22:52.2: ref_mag=15.57 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=15.1049 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:27:37.83 +10:58:49.5: 15.41 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 02:03:48.70 +17:01:39.0: 15.51 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:27:37.83 +10:58:49.5: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9481 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.63 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:03:48.70 +17:01:39.0: ref_mag=15.63 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=15.0996 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51914.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51991.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52257.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52298.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52303.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52390.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52420.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52428.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 17s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51647_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 51647_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51649_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 51649_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51657_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 51657_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51658_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 51658_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51659_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 51659_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51661_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 51661_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51663_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 51663_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51664_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 51664_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51665_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 51665_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51666_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 51666_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:26:20.49 +17:42:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51670_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 51670_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51735_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 51735_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51770_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 51770_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51774_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 51774_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51795_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 51795_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51797_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 51797_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:49:41.92 +17:29:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51822_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 51822_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:06:44.21 +12:26:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51825_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 51825_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51831_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 51831_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51865_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 51865_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51871_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 51871_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51914_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
Preparing report for the candidate 51914_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51917_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 51917_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51931_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 51931_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51950_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 51950_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51957_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 51957_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51978_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 51978_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51991_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
Preparing report for the candidate 51991_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52017_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52017_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52037_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52037_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52051_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52051_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52066_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52066_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52076_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52076_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52080_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52080_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52089_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52089_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52092_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52092_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52105_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52105_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52107_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52107_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52111_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52111_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52122_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52122_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52123_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52123_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52124_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52124_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52138_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52138_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52140_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52140_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52142_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52142_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52143_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52143_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52147_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52147_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52151_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52151_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:48:50.98 +16:23:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52154_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52154_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52160_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52160_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52166_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52166_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:14:54.04 +08:56:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52169_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52169_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52193_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52193_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52195_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52195_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52200_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52200_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52201_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52201_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52206_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52206_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52210_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52210_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52217_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52217_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52250_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52250_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:43:42.67 +12:53:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52252_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52252_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52256_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52256_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52257_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
Preparing report for the candidate 52257_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52258_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52258_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52259_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52259_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52263_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52263_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52267_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52267_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52268_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52268_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52286_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52286_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52295_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52295_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52296_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52296_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52298_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
Preparing report for the candidate 52298_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52303_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
Preparing report for the candidate 52303_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52305_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52305_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52306_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52306_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52309_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52309_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52311_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52311_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52315_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52315_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52316_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52316_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52318_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52318_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52324_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52324_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52332_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52332_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52335_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52335_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52336_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52336_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:02:42.97 +13:27:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52342_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52342_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52354_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52354_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52359_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52359_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52361_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52361_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52368_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52368_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52371_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52371_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52383_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52383_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52384_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52384_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52390_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
Preparing report for the candidate 52390_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52395_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52395_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52400_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52400_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52403_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52403_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52404_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52404_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52407_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52407_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52410_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52410_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52411_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52411_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52416_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52416_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52420_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
Preparing report for the candidate 52420_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52422_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52422_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52428_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
Preparing report for the candidate 52428_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52432_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52432_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52436_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52436_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52441_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52441_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52442_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52442_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52443_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52443_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52444_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52444_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52453_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52453_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52455_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52455_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52465_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52465_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52472_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52472_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52475_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52475_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52477_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52477_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52483_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52483_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52486_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52486_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52488_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52488_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52490_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52490_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52491_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52491_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52508_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52508_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52514_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52514_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52515_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52515_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52517_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52517_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52518_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52518_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52520_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52520_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52522_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52522_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52523_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52523_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52528_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52528_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52529_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52529_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52532_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52532_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52546_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52546_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52547_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52547_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52550_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52550_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52555_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52555_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52559_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52559_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52560_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52560_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52561_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52561_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52565_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52565_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52566_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52566_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52567_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52567_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52569_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52569_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52576_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52576_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52577_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52577_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52579_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52579_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52582_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52582_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52591_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52591_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52602_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52602_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52604_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52604_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52611_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52611_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52612_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52612_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52617_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52617_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52619_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52619_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52630_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52630_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52633_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52633_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52636_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52636_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52644_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52644_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52648_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52648_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52650_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52650_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52651_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52651_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52662_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52662_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52666_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52666_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52671_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52671_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52673_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52673_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52680_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52680_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52681_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52681_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52684_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52684_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52689_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52689_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52695_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52695_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52697_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52697_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52711_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52711_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52715_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52715_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52717_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52717_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52721_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52721_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52723_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52723_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52724_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52724_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52731_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52731_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52732_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52732_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52736_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52736_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52737_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52737_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52738_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52738_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52739_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52739_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52755_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52755_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52757_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52757_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52763_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 52763_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31656_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 31656_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:22:58.49 +12:52:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29370_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367
The candidate 29370_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_03-59-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0367 did not pass the final checks
