This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.1923 2461271.6923 12.88 16:35:12.18 -06:16:15.2
9.84372 26.46442 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 4.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.258 Tyche 0 -0 0 12.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:35:12.18 -06:16:15.2: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:35:12.18 -06:16:15.2: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.6923,12.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.1923 12.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.1923 2461271.6923 13.60 16:01:57.94 -03:48:25.2
6.54770 34.62173 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.4" and 4.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.660 Crescentia 0 0 0 13.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:01:57.94 -03:48:25.2: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:01:57.94 -03:48:25.2: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.6923,13.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.1923 13.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.1923 2461271.6923 14.36 15:47:38.47 -02:10:27.1
5.46003 38.45471 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 3.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.304 Olga 0 -0 0 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 15:47:38.47 -02:10:27.1: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 15:47:38.47 -02:10:27.1: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 19.1923* 15 47 38.47 -02 10 27.1 14.4 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.6923,14.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.1923 14.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.1923 2461271.6923 14.64 16:12:47.22 -02:34:15.6
9.66535 33.16310 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 4.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.276 Adelheid 0 -0 0 14.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:12:47.22 -02:34:15.6: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:12:47.22 -02:34:15.6: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 19.1923* 16 12 47.22 -02 34 15.6 14.6 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.6923,14.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.1923 14.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461228.72661047 07.07.2026 05:26:09.145 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
First image: 2461228.72661047 07.07.2026 05:26:09.145 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
Last image: 2461271.69362525 19.08.2026 04:38:39.222 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7917
Objects passed selection criteria: 7916
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7607.75
Average stars matched: 7415.25 (97.4697 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 235148 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 19 02:43:12 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461228.72661047 07.07.2026 05:26:09.145 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
First image: 2461228.72661047 07.07.2026 05:26:09.145 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
Last image: 2461271.69362525 19.08.2026 04:38:39.222 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 100
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 101 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 59929
Objects passed selection criteria: 59781
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 56882.2
Average stars matched: 55111.5 (96.887 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 281136 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 19 02:46:04 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461271.69098595
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:11.710 -01:59:20.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:08.466 -01:58:18.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:11.710 -01:59:20.73
Second-epoch image center 16:17:08.466 -01:58:18.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0220 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:06.985 -01:58:31.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:11.710 -01:59:20.73
Second-epoch image center 16:17:06.985 -01:58:31.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0240 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:08.466 -01:58:18.21
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:06.985 -01:58:31.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00718 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1zti0bUysY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits &> /tmp/tmp.i1PfohomuG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DGGz14pNcg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Y4QIWbAHAh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7946 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1635 to 252.4351 deg, Dec -7.6667 to +3.7144 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1635 to 252.4351 deg, Dec -7.6667 to 3.7144 deg
Loaded 5813 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4237 out of 4421 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4421 out of 7946 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.683800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.683800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.01
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.01
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7946 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1635 to 252.4351 deg, Dec -7.6667 to +3.7144 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1635 to 252.4351 deg, Dec -7.6667 to 3.7144 deg
Loaded 5813 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4237 out of 4421 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4421 out of 7946 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 7891 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1695 to 252.4601 deg, Dec -7.6666 to +3.7094 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1695 to 252.4601 deg, Dec -7.6666 to 3.7094 deg
Loaded 5817 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4240 out of 4426 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4426 out of 7891 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 9 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
2.1 pix Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
2.3 pix fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
2.5 pix fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
15.0 mag. Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.1zti0bUysY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=514, bad_region=0, passed=7946
Got 7946 stars (including 7422 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7946 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4924 stars left (next iteration limit 5416)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits N_match=4924 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.343 n_q1=1570 n_q2=1184 n_q3=1165 n_q4=1005 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.164
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.i1PfohomuG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=519, bad_region=0, passed=7891
Got 7891 stars (including 7359 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7891 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4925 stars left (next iteration limit 5416)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits N_match=4925 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.368 n_q1=1572 n_q2=1183 n_q3=1166 n_q4=1004 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.154
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DGGz14pNcg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=412, bad_region=0, passed=6765
Got 6765 stars (including 6345 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6765 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6765 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6765 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6765 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5413)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4922 robust_rms=9.416 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.381 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4922 robust_rms=0.502 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.559 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4922 robust_rms=0.350 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.385 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4922 robust_rms_before=0.891 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.355 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.350 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.392 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.385
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.392 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.318 n_q1=1596 n_q2=1186 n_q3=1159 n_q4=981 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.117
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Y4QIWbAHAh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=391, bad_region=0, passed=7987
Got 7987 stars (including 7590 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7987 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7987 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7987 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7987 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5415)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4922 robust_rms=9.337 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.065 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4922 robust_rms=0.357 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.372 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4922 robust_rms=0.286 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.304 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4922 robust_rms_before=0.792 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.296 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.286 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.324 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.304
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.324 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.300 n_q1=1611 n_q2=1161 n_q3=1186 n_q4=964 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits sigma_overall=0.358 worst_q_ratio=1.164
ref2=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits sigma_overall=0.376 worst_q_ratio=1.154
new1=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits sigma_overall=0.360 worst_q_ratio=1.117
new2=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits sigma_overall=0.303 worst_q_ratio=1.105
reference average sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.159
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168_astrometric_residuals.png (4924 matched stars from wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169_astrometric_residuals.png (4925 matched stars from wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122_astrometric_residuals.png (4922 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123_astrometric_residuals.png (4922 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:25:06.62 -00:37:04.8: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:17:40.38 -01:50:41.0: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:14:42.28 +02:10:52.8: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:10:06.45 -01:03:18.5: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:35:46.74 +01:29:26.8: 12.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:18:46.92 -01:45:40.0: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:12:02.40 -00:33:48.5: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:14:42.28 +02:10:52.8: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:12:02.40 -00:33:48.5: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:10:06.45 -01:03:18.5: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:18:46.92 -01:45:40.0: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:25:06.62 -00:37:04.8: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:35:46.74 +01:29:26.8: 12.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:17:40.38 -01:50:41.0: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:02.40 -00:33:48.5: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1046 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:42.28 +02:10:52.8: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1241 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:06.45 -01:03:18.5: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9959 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.08 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:46.92 -01:45:40.0: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0824 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:06.62 -00:37:04.8: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0340 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:40.38 -01:50:41.0: ref_mag=12.08 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0496 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:35:46.74 +01:29:26.8: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0966 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20407_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 20407_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:45:48.71 -03:50:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20415_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 20415_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20417_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 20417_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20419_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 20419_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20420_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 20420_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20422_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 20422_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20423_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 20423_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20424_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 20424_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06907_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 06907_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:30:41.19 -06:40:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ser-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:11.710 -01:59:20.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:08.466 -01:58:18.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:11.710 -01:59:20.73
Second-epoch image center 16:17:08.466 -01:58:18.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0220 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:06.985 -01:58:31.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:11.710 -01:59:20.73
Second-epoch image center 16:17:06.985 -01:58:31.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0240 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:08.466 -01:58:18.21
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:06.985 -01:58:31.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00718 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MREZTa4j2b
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tC0Qo1o01u
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RTm2GlyLM6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mnKOEFL473
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 62840 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.0987 to 252.4554 deg, Dec -7.6667 to +3.7353 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.0987 to 252.4554 deg, Dec -7.6667 to 3.7353 deg
Loaded 5840 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4032 out of 4592 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4592 out of 62840 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.529200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.529200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 62840 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.0987 to 252.4554 deg, Dec -7.6667 to +3.7353 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.0987 to 252.4554 deg, Dec -7.6667 to 3.7353 deg
Loaded 5840 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4032 out of 4592 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4592 out of 62840 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 63091 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1183 to 252.4846 deg, Dec -7.6909 to +3.7231 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1183 to 252.4846 deg, Dec -7.6909 to 3.7231 deg
Loaded 5852 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4036 out of 4593 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4593 out of 63091 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 77 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
1.9 pix Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
2.1 pix fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
2.4 pix fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
15.2 mag. Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.MREZTa4j2b (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=3091, bad_region=9, passed=62812
Got 62812 stars (including 59585 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62812 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4935 stars left (next iteration limit 5428)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits N_match=4935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.329 n_q1=1555 n_q2=1194 n_q3=1168 n_q4=1018 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.171
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tC0Qo1o01u (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=33, blended=3188, bad_region=15, passed=63058
Got 63058 stars (including 59755 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 63058 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4936 stars left (next iteration limit 5429)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits N_match=4936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.355 n_q1=1556 n_q2=1196 n_q3=1169 n_q4=1015 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.130
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RTm2GlyLM6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2391, bad_region=19, passed=50977
Got 50977 stars (including 48488 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50977 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4933 stars left (next iteration limit 5424)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4933 robust_rms=9.723 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.938 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4933 robust_rms=0.489 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.530 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4933 robust_rms=0.335 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.362 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4933 robust_rms_before=0.892 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.341 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.335 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.372 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.362
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.372 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits N_match=4933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=1564 n_q2=1208 n_q3=1140 n_q4=1021 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.085
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mnKOEFL473 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2033, bad_region=18, passed=52328
Got 52328 stars (including 50199 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52328 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52328 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52328 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52328 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4929 stars left (next iteration limit 5421)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4929 robust_rms=9.402 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.747 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4929 robust_rms=0.357 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.373 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4929 robust_rms=0.283 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.301 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4929 robust_rms_before=0.796 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.297 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.283 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.321 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.301
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.321 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits N_match=4929 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.307 n_q1=1590 n_q2=1172 n_q3=1212 n_q4=955 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.066
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-34-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_233921_TTUQ1b1x1_3645316_QEhYmtOw/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:46:16.30 -04:35:46.2: 14.40 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:25:44.39 -01:18:29.5: 15.34 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:48:19.57 +00:00:12.8: 14.46 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:31:16.43 -00:36:33.3: 14.73 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:33:39.44 -01:30:35.3: 13.83 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:43:43.07 -01:28:03.1: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:21:11.27 +01:09:52.6: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:45:18.55 +02:35:12.8: 14.68 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:33:39.44 -01:30:35.3: 14.03 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:21:11.27 +01:09:52.6: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:45:18.55 +02:35:12.8: 14.98 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:25:44.39 -01:18:29.5: 15.07 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:43:43.07 -01:28:03.1: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:48:19.57 +00:00:12.8: 14.40 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:33:39.44 -01:30:35.3: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2602 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:18.55 +02:35:12.8: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3998 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:44.39 -01:18:29.5: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6465 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:31:16.43 -00:36:33.3: 14.55 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:43.07 -01:28:03.1: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0265 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:11.27 +01:09:52.6: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6324 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:46:16.30 -04:35:46.2: 14.58 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:19.57 +00:00:12.8: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5214 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:16.43 -00:36:33.3: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4950 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:16.30 -04:35:46.2: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3440 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:35:12.18 -06:16:15.2: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:01:57.94 -03:48:25.2: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:35:12.18 -06:16:15.2: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:29:38.95 -03:54:41.4: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:33:41.49 +01:36:48.4: 14.32 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:42:18.21 -06:49:05.3: 15.09 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:01:57.94 -03:48:25.2: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:42:43.24 -06:59:33.3: 15.03 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:44:50.66 -05:16:34.1: 14.73 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:44:35.37 -06:25:28.3: 14.83 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:29:38.95 -03:54:41.4: 13.90 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:29:38.95 -03:54:41.4: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0619 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:33:41.49 +01:36:48.4: 14.47 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:33:41.49 +01:36:48.4: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3603 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:42:18.21 -06:49:05.3: 14.71 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:18.21 -06:49:05.3: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3885 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:42:21.31 -05:34:27.0: 14.90 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:44:50.66 -05:16:34.1: 14.59 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:42:43.24 -06:59:33.3: 15.09 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:44:35.37 -06:25:28.3: 14.65 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:43.24 -06:59:33.3: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.4024 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:50.66 -05:16:34.1: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2943 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:35.37 -06:25:28.3: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4122 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:42:21.31 -05:34:27.0: 14.60 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:21.31 -05:34:27.0: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4595 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:44:13.07 -03:42:31.4: 14.79 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:14:44.30 -00:23:50.1: 14.11 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 15:47:38.47 -02:10:27.1: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:30:06.23 -06:58:35.0: 14.67 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:23:05.41 -00:16:46.6: 14.20 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:44:13.07 -03:42:31.4: 14.81 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:13.07 -03:42:31.4: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3687 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:14:44.30 -00:23:50.1: 14.29 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 15:47:38.47 -02:10:27.1: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:44.30 -00:23:50.1: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3690 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:37:43.99 -06:14:27.3: 14.69 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:30:06.23 -06:58:35.0: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:23:05.41 -00:16:46.6: 14.30 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:06.23 -06:58:35.0: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4622 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:23:05.41 -00:16:46.6: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3526 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:27:18.42 +02:52:01.0: 14.59 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:42:49.70 +01:58:08.1: 15.64 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:37:43.99 -06:14:27.3: 15.33 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:43.99 -06:14:27.3: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6670 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:27:18.42 +02:52:01.0: 14.74 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:27:18.42 +02:52:01.0: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6797 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:42:49.70 +01:58:08.1: 15.15 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:49.70 +01:58:08.1: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.5994 delta=0.69 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:12:47.22 -02:34:15.6: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:28:38.89 -00:43:11.3: 14.72 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:29:37.27 +01:41:11.0: 15.26 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:31:36.84 +00:28:36.0: 15.03 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:12:47.22 -02:34:15.6: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:28:38.89 -00:43:11.3: 14.84 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:28:38.89 -00:43:11.3: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6342 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:41:08.78 +01:04:41.9: 15.05 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:29:37.27 +01:41:11.0: 15.05 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:29:37.27 +01:41:11.0: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7094 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:31:36.84 +00:28:36.0: 15.11 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:36.84 +00:28:36.0: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6845 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:37:28.02 -05:12:34.4: 14.99 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:42:28.33 +01:19:13.9: 14.71 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:41:08.78 +01:04:41.9: 14.28 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:08.78 +01:04:41.9: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5960 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:37:28.02 -05:12:34.4: 14.91 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:42:28.33 +01:19:13.9: 14.62 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:28.02 -05:12:34.4: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7673 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:28.33 +01:19:13.9: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6640 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:21:37.62 -01:04:22.5: 14.62 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:40:04.75 -03:51:13.4: 14.68 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:45:15.16 -02:05:43.5: 14.94 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:21:37.62 -01:04:22.5: 14.97 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:37.62 -01:04:22.5: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4922 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:31:54.69 +01:48:14.1: 15.51 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:40:04.75 -03:51:13.4: 14.84 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:04.75 -03:51:13.4: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6106 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:25:47.70 -03:20:01.9: 14.84 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:45:15.16 -02:05:43.5: 14.72 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:28:37.09 -01:29:26.8: 14.83 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:15.16 -02:05:43.5: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6293 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:31:54.69 +01:48:14.1: 15.23 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:54.69 +01:48:14.1: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6901 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:25:47.70 -03:20:01.9: 15.10 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:28:37.09 -01:29:26.8: 14.55 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:47.70 -03:20:01.9: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7902 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:28:37.09 -01:29:26.8: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5948 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:43:58.49 +02:05:06.8: 14.99 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:34:49.60 +01:40:20.4: 14.67 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:43:58.49 +02:05:06.8: 15.31 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:19:51.79 -05:11:59.4: 14.69 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:58.49 +02:05:06.8: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7625 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:38:37.78 -03:11:47.3: 14.85 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:34:49.60 +01:40:20.4: 14.73 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:36:24.53 -05:05:17.3: 14.83 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:34:49.60 +01:40:20.4: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5571 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:19:51.79 -05:11:59.4: 14.99 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:38:37.78 -03:11:47.3: 14.66 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:37.78 -03:11:47.3: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4925 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:51.79 -05:11:59.4: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7704 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:34:52.14 -05:48:39.5: 15.14 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:36:24.53 -05:05:17.3: 14.85 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:36:24.53 -05:05:17.3: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5941 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:29:30.77 -05:00:12.1: 14.77 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:34:52.14 -05:48:39.5: 15.02 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:34:52.14 -05:48:39.5: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6273 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-26-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits at 16:43:43.56 +00:31:36.6: 15.17 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:29:30.77 -05:00:12.1: 14.80 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:29:30.77 -05:00:12.1: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7009 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-27-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits at 16:43:43.56 +00:31:36.6: 15.05 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:43.56 +00:31:36.6: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7961 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78652.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78694.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78809.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78865.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78570_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78570_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78579_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78579_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78580_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78580_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78582_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78582_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78586_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78586_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78588_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78588_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78600_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78600_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78609_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78609_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78617_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78617_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78620_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78620_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:00.30 -03:14:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78625_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78625_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78634_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78634_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78637_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78637_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78641_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78641_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78646_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78646_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78652_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
Preparing report for the candidate 78652_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78662_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78662_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:16.54 -07:06:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78668_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78668_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78671_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78671_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78673_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78673_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78694_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
Preparing report for the candidate 78694_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78707_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78707_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78712_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78712_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78713_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78713_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78718_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78718_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78722_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78722_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78724_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78724_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78727_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78727_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78735_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78735_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78743_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78743_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78749_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78749_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78758_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78758_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78763_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78763_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78766_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78766_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78773_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78773_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78777_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78777_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78788_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78788_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78790_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78790_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78792_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78792_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78799_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78799_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78800_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78800_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78807_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78807_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78808_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78808_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:13:53.48 -06:32:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78809_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
Preparing report for the candidate 78809_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78814_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78814_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78818_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78818_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78819_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78819_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78833_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78833_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78845_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78845_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78856_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78856_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78859_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78859_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78860_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78860_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78865_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
Preparing report for the candidate 78865_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78869_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78869_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78870_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78870_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78879_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78879_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78883_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78883_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78895_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78895_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78896_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78896_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78899_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78899_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78907_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78907_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78909_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78909_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78914_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78914_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78916_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78916_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78922_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78922_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78923_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78923_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78925_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78925_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78933_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78933_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78936_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78936_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78943_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78943_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78957_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78957_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78958_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78958_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78959_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78959_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78978_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78978_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78986_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 78986_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55722_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 55722_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:45:48.74 -03:50:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45725_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123
The candidate 45725_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-38-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0123 did not pass the final checks