fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 19.17975 | 2461271.67975 | 14.54 | 12:27:29.53 +60:31:11.6 | 2721 3885 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 19.18024 | 2461271.68024 | 14.73 | 12:27:28.64 +60:31:13.6 | 2721 3884 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits |
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.1800 2461271.6800 14.63 12:27:29.09 +60:31:12.6
128.24951 56.36009 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.9" and 0.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 12:27:29.09 +60:31:12.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:27:29.09 +60:31:12.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:27:29.09 +60:31:12.6: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5 FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3 ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr) INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: UMa-04-Q1b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting UMa-04-Q1b1x1 ########### Processing UMa-04-Q1b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 225399 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 225399 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits_preview.png'
UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
renamed 'UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits_preview.png'
UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 482.7200 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 528.8252 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1307.4143 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 485.6390 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1306.5772 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 484.9148 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.70843 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 31.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-18T23:18:40.6568695' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-19T04:18:40.6568695' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61271.1796372221 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-19T04:18:50.5594511' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61271.1797518404 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.999664991398 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 62.0001125727975 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 20.8377777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 331.686111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.79219700117708 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-04' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29505 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29505 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 23.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.91 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 31.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 16.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.100488 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/d_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits :) Spent 0.788587 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/d_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 31.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-18T23:19:22.7377406' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-19T04:19:22.7377406' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61271.1801242707 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-19T04:19:32.6422248' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61271.1802389119 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.999665034353 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 62.0001126091437 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 20.7688888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 331.734722222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.80090517732721 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-04' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29505 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29505 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 23.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.91 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 31.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 16.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.100488 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/d_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits :) Spent 0.711119 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/d_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461271.67975296 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Image size: 941.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Image size: 941.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:11.076 +62:03:03.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32 Second-epoch image center 12:00:11.076 +62:03:03.66 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0469 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Image size: 941.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:10.167 +62:03:00.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32 Second-epoch image center 12:00:10.167 +62:03:00.89 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0456 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 12:00:11.076 +62:03:03.66 Second-epoch second image center 12:00:10.167 +62:03:00.89 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00194 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits &> /tmp/tmp.w72rz2fK3n Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RhgBX54qqL Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iZmRSYcr7V Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits &> /tmp/tmp.p2rHh5SLke Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 7332 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9729 to 198.4317 deg, Dec +55.2640 to +67.4533 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9729 to 198.4317 deg, Dec 55.2640 to 67.4533 deg Loaded 6574 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3976 out of 4190 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4190 out of 7332 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.896950 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.896950 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 7332 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9729 to 198.4317 deg, Dec +55.2640 to +67.4533 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9729 to 198.4317 deg, Dec 55.2640 to 67.4533 deg Loaded 6574 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3976 out of 4190 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4190 out of 7332 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (aperture=6.4) Read 7282 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9723 to 198.4317 deg, Dec +55.3313 to +67.4947 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9723 to 198.4317 deg, Dec 55.3313 to 67.4947 deg Loaded 6542 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3979 out of 4176 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4176 out of 7282 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits (aperture=6.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 2.2 pix UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 2.6 pix fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits 2.6 pix fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 15.4 mag. UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 14.5 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits 14.6 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.w72rz2fK3n (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=506, bad_region=0, passed=7332 Got 7332 stars (including 6822 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7332 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7332 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7332 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7332 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5396) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=1138 n_q2=1153 n_q3=1306 n_q4=1309 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.205 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.RhgBX54qqL (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=494, bad_region=0, passed=7282 Got 7282 stars (including 6779 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7282 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7282 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7282 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7282 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5397) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.343 n_q1=1150 n_q2=1156 n_q3=1305 n_q4=1295 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.252 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.iZmRSYcr7V (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=243, bad_region=0, passed=4748 Got 4748 stars (including 4494 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4748 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4409 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4403 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4403 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4403 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4748 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4410 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4403 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4748 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4403 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4748 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4403 stars left (next iteration limit 4843) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4403 robust_rms=11.480 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.347 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4403 robust_rms=0.401 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.488 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4403 robust_rms=0.340 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.405 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4403 robust_rms_before=0.828 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.317 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.340 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.362 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.405 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.362 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits N_match=4403 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.356 n_q1=1162 n_q2=1144 n_q3=1085 n_q4=1012 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.p2rHh5SLke (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=248, bad_region=0, passed=4740 Got 4740 stars (including 4485 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4740 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4398 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4392 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4392 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4392 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4740 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4399 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4392 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4740 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4392 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4740 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4392 stars left (next iteration limit 4831) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4392 robust_rms=11.181 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.823 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4392 robust_rms=0.412 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.504 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4392 robust_rms=0.343 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.434 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4392 robust_rms_before=0.843 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.316 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.343 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.373 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.434 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.373 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits N_match=4392 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.377 n_q1=1161 n_q2=1137 n_q3=1101 n_q4=993 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.176 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits sigma_overall=0.363 worst_q_ratio=1.205 ref2=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits sigma_overall=0.386 worst_q_ratio=1.252 new1=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits sigma_overall=0.316 worst_q_ratio=1.125 new2=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits sigma_overall=0.320 worst_q_ratio=1.176 reference average sigma_overall=0.3745 worst_q_ratio=1.2285 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278_astrometric_residuals.png (4906 matched stars from wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279_astrometric_residuals.png (4906 matched stars from wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108_astrometric_residuals.png (4403 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109_astrometric_residuals.png (4392 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01679_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 01679_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks**** FOUND 12:36:23.18 +59:29:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Image size: 941.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Image size: 941.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:11.076 +62:03:03.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32 Second-epoch image center 12:00:11.076 +62:03:03.66 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0469 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Image size: 941.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:10.167 +62:03:00.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32 Second-epoch image center 12:00:10.167 +62:03:00.89 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0456 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 12:00:11.076 +62:03:03.66 Second-epoch second image center 12:00:10.167 +62:03:00.89 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00194 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits &> /tmp/tmp.I8nwlDxPAe Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kpNK72CSxz Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WQUAe0cIph Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PtRcNKxwST Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_ Discovery image 3 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 7.47 12:36:23.21 +59:29:13.3 1942 4377 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits .fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 37333 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9729 to 198.6786 deg, Dec +55.2253 to +67.4860 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9729 to 198.6786 deg, Dec 55.2253 to 67.4860 deg Loaded 6642 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3749 out of 4194 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4194 out of 37333 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.792800 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.792800 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 37333 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9729 to 198.6786 deg, Dec +55.2253 to +67.4860 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9729 to 198.6786 deg, Dec 55.2253 to 67.4860 deg Loaded 6642 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3749 out of 4194 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4194 out of 37333 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (aperture=5.1) Read 37494 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9724 to 198.6777 deg, Dec +55.2649 to +67.4946 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9724 to 198.6777 deg, Dec 55.2649 to 67.4946 deg Loaded 6625 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3749 out of 4189 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4189 out of 37494 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits (aperture=5.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 85 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 2.1 pix UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 2.5 pix fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits 2.5 pix fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 15.5 mag. UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 14.7 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits 14.7 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.I8nwlDxPAe (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1765, bad_region=9, passed=37315 Got 37315 stars (including 35474 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37315 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37315 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37315 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37315 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5399) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=1136 n_q2=1161 n_q3=1318 n_q4=1294 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.215 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.kpNK72CSxz (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1739, bad_region=9, passed=37476 Got 37476 stars (including 35663 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37476 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37476 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37476 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37476 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5396) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.325 n_q1=1133 n_q2=1164 n_q3=1311 n_q4=1298 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.224 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.WQUAe0cIph (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=773, bad_region=23, passed=24054 Got 24054 stars (including 23216 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24054 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24054 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24054 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24054 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5383) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4895 robust_rms=10.317 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.925 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4895 robust_rms=0.405 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.482 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4895 robust_rms=0.344 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.407 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4895 robust_rms_before=0.837 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.317 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.344 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.357 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.407 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.357 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.351 n_q1=1328 n_q2=1260 n_q3=1242 n_q4=1065 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.126 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.PtRcNKxwST (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=799, bad_region=23, passed=24032 Got 24032 stars (including 23164 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24032 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4893 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24032 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24032 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24032 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5382) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=10.061 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.685 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=0.409 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.494 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=0.342 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.436 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4893 robust_rms_before=0.848 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.319 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.342 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.373 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.436 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.373 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.372 n_q1=1328 n_q2=1267 n_q3=1239 n_q4=1059 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.159 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:23:16.75 +60:52:22.3: 14.89 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:35:53.61 +61:33:07.8: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:23:16.75 +60:52:22.3: 14.88 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:23:16.75 +60:52:22.3: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7475 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:35:53.61 +61:33:07.8: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:35:53.61 +61:33:07.8: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3725 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:45:44.46 +61:47:31.6: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:29:26.88 +66:19:08.2: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:45:44.46 +61:47:31.6: 13.96 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:45:44.46 +61:47:31.6: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9304 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:29:26.88 +66:19:08.2: 14.10 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:29:26.88 +66:19:08.2: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9904 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:27:29.09 +60:31:12.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:27:29.09 +60:31:12.6: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54477.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52571_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 52571_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checksDiscovery image 1 2026 08 19.17975 2461271.67975 14.76 12:23:16.91 +60:52:22.4 3062 3724 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52574_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 52574_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 14.73 12:23:16.60 +60:52:22.2 3062 3723 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52577_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 52577_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 14.31 12:22:45.56 +63:33:52.7 3342 2125 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52579_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 52579_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 14.04 12:57:57.12 +64:27:40.2 1175 1084 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits **** FOUND 12:18:38.47 +63:15:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52705_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 52705_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.83 12:18:38.53 +63:15:53.2 3591 2343 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52778_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 52778_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 10.73 12:13:23.49 +60:04:20.6 3725 4297 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52808_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 52808_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 11.32 12:09:31.09 +64:13:32.4 4262 1839 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52834_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 52834_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 11.59 12:55:40.92 +62:55:18.1 1063 2025 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits **** FOUND 12:15:42.32 +57:00:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52897_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 52897_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 11.64 12:15:42.34 +57:00:10.9 3323 6122 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52917_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 52917_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 11.82 11:50:57.96 +66:58:50.9 5520 0248 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52918_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 52918_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 11.86 11:51:23.30 +58:23:59.7 5342 5422 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52963_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 52963_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 11.82 11:09:01.70 +64:41:25.9 8188 1476 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits **** FOUND 11:45:01.48 +64:47:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53069_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53069_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 12.16 11:45:01.51 +64:47:36.5 5864 1577 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53147_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53147_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 12.42 11:47:07.76 +64:34:31.5 5727 1708 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits **** FOUND 12:15:28.46 +56:59:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53191_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53191_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 12.54 12:15:28.41 +56:59:08.6 3340 6134 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits **** FOUND 11:04:04.14 +61:47:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53227_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53227_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 12.53 11:04:04.20 +61:47:51.0 8776 3161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53326_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53326_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 12.84 12:11:24.64 +58:57:21.4 3801 4983 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53333_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53333_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.11 11:59:13.01 +64:52:11.8 4957 1504 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53393_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53393_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.04 12:18:58.71 +65:14:49.1 3730 1155 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53406_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53406_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.19 11:55:50.00 +59:12:17.4 5014 4923 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53411_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53411_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 12.98 11:03:39.96 +64:11:00.9 8582 1727 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53423_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53423_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.13 12:55:28.39 +62:06:09.2 0941 2507 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53440_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53440_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.57 12:55:54.71 +58:43:02.0 0341 4478 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53500_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53500_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.13 11:49:50.48 +64:31:34.2 5551 1735 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits **** FOUND 12:43:29.22 +65:57:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53510_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53510_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.35 12:43:29.09 +65:57:21.9 2301 0448 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 19.17975 2461271.67975 13.37 12:35:53.59 +61:33:07.9 2231 3161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53526_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53526_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.38 12:35:53.64 +61:33:07.8 2229 3160 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits **** FOUND 12:29:45.35 +58:23:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53563_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53563_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.17 12:29:45.41 +58:23:46.0 2326 5121 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53570_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53570_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.72 12:52:31.38 +56:52:36.7 0303 5635 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53580_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53580_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.34 12:56:00.90 +58:13:42.6 0250 4763 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits **** FOUND 12:50:42.34 +62:58:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53585_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53585_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.40 12:50:42.39 +62:58:08.9 1404 2089 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits **** FOUND 11:21:37.17 +57:04:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53593_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53593_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.08 11:21:37.06 +57:04:12.2 7770 6168 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53599_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53599_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.26 12:07:17.22 +57:29:22.8 4039 5898 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53608_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53608_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.48 11:00:42.31 +59:21:51.2 9264 4581 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53610_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53610_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.55 12:47:39.00 +57:21:59.9 0774 5442 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53622_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53622_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.53 12:58:43.40 +58:58:45.2 0171 4264 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53734_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53734_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.39 13:04:05.97 +65:46:11.2 1029 0203 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53751_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53751_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.70 13:02:06.70 +60:30:21.6 0193 3299 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits **** FOUND 11:58:21.20 +61:26:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53761_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53761_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.51 11:58:21.19 +61:26:11.6 4896 3571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53768_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53768_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.42 12:50:08.03 +64:47:55.6 1723 1026 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53777_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53777_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.65 12:54:12.35 +62:34:20.1 1105 2257 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53791_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53791_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.41 13:02:32.24 +64:27:24.5 0884 0997 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53794_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53794_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.72 11:20:24.30 +64:43:06.1 7451 1547 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53798_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53798_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.70 12:58:24.30 +59:51:29.3 0349 3757 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53800_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53800_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.72 13:05:40.05 +62:20:05.9 0284 2160 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53819_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53819_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.75 12:48:11.30 +61:48:29.8 1400 2814 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53826_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53826_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.38 11:00:00.03 +61:09:37.2 9133 3495 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53908_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53908_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.66 12:18:28.21 +57:45:55.4 3159 5634 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53910_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53910_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.68 12:28:28.20 +65:47:26.1 3193 0737 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits **** FOUND 11:23:14.70 +58:34:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53914_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53914_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.53 11:23:14.58 +58:34:10.6 7562 5268 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits **** FOUND 11:59:58.74 +59:05:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53926_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53926_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.76 11:59:58.70 +59:05:42.7 4691 4972 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53938_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53938_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.52 11:52:29.43 +58:09:09.1 5250 5569 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53939_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53939_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.72 13:03:21.25 +63:47:50.0 0711 1363 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53946_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53946_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.83 12:55:21.44 +60:47:52.4 0732 3271 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53948_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53948_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.88 12:50:10.35 +66:03:14.6 1913 0287 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53960_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 53960_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.84 10:56:44.56 +63:04:18.5 9160 2311 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54000_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 54000_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.57 11:07:37.60 +56:58:53.3 8934 6101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 19.17975 2461271.67975 13.97 12:45:44.32 +61:47:30.5 1570 2866 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54019_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 54019_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.90 12:45:44.60 +61:47:32.7 1569 2865 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54125_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 54125_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.97 12:34:09.64 +57:27:51.9 1871 5615 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54154_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 54154_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 14.12 13:01:15.43 +63:57:56.4 0877 1308 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54189_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 54189_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 14.02 12:37:00.85 +58:33:34.2 1779 4918 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits **** FOUND 12:22:11.79 +61:36:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54201_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 54201_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.94 12:22:11.89 +61:36:56.9 3206 3292 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54205_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 54205_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.82 11:02:01.03 +60:11:24.5 9081 4101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 19.17975 2461271.67975 14.14 12:29:27.02 +66:19:08.4 3190 0411 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-18-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54221_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 54221_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.90 12:29:26.74 +66:19:08.0 3189 0411 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54238_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 54238_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 14.01 11:49:11.59 +64:41:06.0 5595 1640 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits **** FOUND 11:46:30.03 +61:30:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54243_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 54243_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 14.02 11:46:29.98 +61:30:36.9 5748 3554 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54263_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 54263_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 14.39 12:45:40.70 +64:57:30.6 2026 1004 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54274_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 54274_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 14.35 13:09:21.06 +63:38:15.6 0292 1326 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54299_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 54299_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 14.32 12:37:36.30 +57:11:13.0 1559 5727 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54340_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 54340_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.83 11:48:19.10 +66:56:34.3 5676 0274 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54397_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 54397_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 14.34 12:39:23.44 +61:50:11.7 2019 2941 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54410_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 54410_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 14.25 12:16:19.29 +57:23:23.3 3302 5882 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54416_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 54416_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 13.89 11:21:11.45 +64:20:23.5 7420 1780 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54425_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 54425_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 14.17 12:36:31.41 +60:41:09.5 2079 3664 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54442_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 54442_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 14.16 11:13:41.30 +60:37:43.6 8171 3957 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54466_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 54466_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 14.10 11:44:36.80 +59:21:33.3 5879 4851 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54470_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 54470_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 14.23 12:22:42.48 +66:43:34.3 3630 0234 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54472_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 54472_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 14.22 11:31:13.96 +62:55:14.2 6804 2683 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54474_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 54474_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 14.14 11:06:41.13 +65:07:33.8 8302 1192 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54477_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 Preparing report for the candidate 54477_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54489_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 54489_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 14.51 12:25:05.51 +63:41:54.6 3200 2021 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54505_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 54505_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 14.04 11:14:15.76 +60:06:06.3 8165 4279 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54517_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 54517_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 14.44 11:40:04.64 +57:09:54.7 6247 6179 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22255_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 22255_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 14.72 12:21:18.12 +59:28:35.7 3083 4578 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 26862_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 26862_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 12.20 12:03:20.15 +67:08:48.8 4798 0111 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits **** FOUND 11:58:43.24 +63:21:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 07651_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 The candidate 07651_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 12.98 11:58:43.29 +63:21:14.1 4936 2418 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits **** FOUND 12:36:23.21 +59:29:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 19s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 12:27:29.09 +60:31:12.6 ########### Completed UMa-04-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 12:27:29.09 +60:31:12.6 ################################################################################### 12:27:29.09 +60:31:12.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' 12:27:29.09 +60:31:12.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) 12:27:29.09 +60:31:12.6 -- not a known variable star Found 1 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 12:27:29.09 +60:31:12.6 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461271.67975296 -observatory V36 09:19:44.73 +17:08:44.9 Mercury (-1.5mag) 12:39:59.32 -06:18:17.5 Venus (-4.5mag) 06:20:50.86 +23:41:39.6 Mars (1.3mag) 08:52:42.75 +18:04:02.5 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:55:16.89 +03:05:14.4 Saturn (0.5mag) 04:12:48.11 +20:59:42.9 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:15:22.54 +00:07:58.2 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:27:07.42 -23:34:09.1 Pluto (14.5mag) 14:42:17.60 -21:55:04.4 Moon (-10.1mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Aug 18 23:27 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461271.67975296: 08:52:39.21 +18:04:18.9 Io (6.1mag) 08:52:53.64 +18:03:13.5 Europa (6.3mag) 08:52:28.39 +18:05:09.3 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:52:19.57 +18:05:46.4 Callisto (6.8mag) 08:50:10.57 +18:10:07.9 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:52:42.34 +18:04:04.6 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:49:48.69 +18:06:33.6 Elara (17.7mag) 08:56:51.23 +17:38:36.5 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:55:09.10 +18:16:50.5 Carme (19.0mag) 00:55:27.01 +03:05:18.4 Titan (8.4mag) 00:55:13.77 +03:05:21.9 Rhea (9.7mag) 00:55:49.74 +03:06:19.3 Iapetus (11.1mag) 00:55:32.56 +03:05:02.2 Hyperion (14.4mag) 00:54:25.53 +02:57:02.4 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 18 23:27 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461271.67975296: 19:54:34.73 -16:27:47.2 JWST 16:37:52.13 +47:03:27.4 Chandra 22:19:08.89 +56:17:01.4 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 18 23:27 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461271.67975296 -observatory V36 03:25:15.50 +18:13:26.7 17.6mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 17:59:57.23 -34:31:12.3 14.1mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:03:43.98 -69:20:46.3 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:12:28.60 +33:14:02.4 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 04:13:31.26 +41:33:40.3 17.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:29:26.02 +30:39:26.6 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:54:01.13 +26:20:36.2 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:31:44.83 +27:59:13.1 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:36:11.55 +05:18:22.4 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:14:47.77 -12:44:16.2 18.0mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 20:57:01.09 +64:34:25.7 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 15:38:33.50 -13:56:45.0 14.5mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:19:59.10 +31:51:21.8 15.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:05:48.39 +15:32:08.2 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:50:11.76 +43:27:58.1 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:54:14.12 +49:39:01.8 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:23:30.80 -12:53:52.5 15.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:02:53.21 +22:11:32.6 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 10:48:33.52 +20:10:50.6 17.1mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:05:10.40 +01:35:16.7 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:07:03.66 +76:40:20.9 16.6mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:09:52.63 +46:20:12.5 17.2mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:56:04.23 +09:38:16.7 17.4mag A/2026 E1 22:09:30.42 -31:21:58.4 7.1mag 10P/Tempel 11:35:42.03 -04:06:16.7 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 11:29:58.38 +01:03:29.9 17.4mag 63P/Wild 00:52:31.57 -05:56:01.3 15.4mag 65P/Gunn 05:59:55.92 +20:22:58.5 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 20:28:21.46 -24:42:09.8 17.5mag 84P/Giclas 03:09:58.55 +14:23:00.7 16.9mag 88P/Howell 08:23:00.61 +26:04:43.8 16.4mag 93P/Lovas 04:38:00.23 +21:09:37.5 17.3mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 06:32:21.45 +28:50:35.2 16.1mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 09:44:16.39 +24:41:49.1 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley 12:05:55.95 -14:25:27.0 17.2mag 124P/Mrkos 05:52:20.88 +21:04:50.0 16.0mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 06:46:50.03 +18:18:03.1 17.9mag 131P/Mueller 00:00:43.81 +03:12:01.5 17.5mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 03:13:15.03 -18:44:54.0 13.1mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 07:53:14.30 +38:07:20.8 16.0mag 162P/Siding Spring 11:44:14.92 +34:26:48.6 12.0mag 169P/NEAT 03:01:29.75 +09:28:51.2 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:48:22.56 -10:54:12.8 18.0mag 235P/LINEAR 20:17:02.14 -52:10:40.9 17.9mag 259P/Garradd 03:54:04.12 +29:37:02.9 15.3mag 260P/McNaught 07:38:02.33 +37:17:02.5 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:14:41.98 +01:54:52.4 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski 09:10:51.03 +17:49:46.2 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.3K Aug 18 23:27 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 18 23:27 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 18 23:27 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 18:19:05.698 +53:11:07.41 AT 2026xah 2026-08-02.19 20.0688 20:55:20.373 -00:21:55.35 AT 2026xag 2026-08-03.47 20.94 14:15:21.615 +05:15:37.35 AT 2026xaf 2026-08-03.30 20.31 14:14:04.946 +13:34:28.62 AT 2026xae 2026-08-03.27 20.15 21:25:11.950 -47:08:43.45 AT 2026xad 2026-06-19.54 20.42 00:02:18.948 +29:04:39.95 AT 2026xac 2026-07-29.51 19.76 21:35:48.554 -26:40:57.79 AT 2026xab 2026-06-16.55 20.65 20:00:04.333 -34:58:06.08 AT 2026xaa 2026-06-16.49 20.62 14:56:06.142 +19:59:52.91 AT 2026wzz 2026-04-20.54 21.17 15:43:22.735 -12:32:40.12 AT 2026wzy 2026-01-29.65 20.48 13:01:31.563 -05:17:30.42 AT 2026wzx 2026-01-20.63 21.3 09:35:39.129 +00:09:39.43 AT 2026wzw 2026-02-14.42 20.88 12:44:03.003 +34:52:48.24 AT 2026wzv 2026-06-15.27 20.69 23:42:29.807 -07:26:38.21 AT 2026wzu 2026-07-25.58 21.31 00:32:59.618 -20:06:29.77 AT 2026wzt 2026-07-20.58 20.4 15:05:16.769 +01:50:59.23 AT 2026wzs 2026-05-14.37 21.11 12:05:52.531 -28:18:31.37 AT 2026wzr 2026-04-21.37 20.31 03:21:56.606 -28:39:02.78 AT 2026wzq 2026-01-09.24 20.45 14:13:05.294 -07:19:09.39 AT 2026wzp 2026-06-19.28 20.92 21:36:19.343 -31:00:18.98 AT 2026wzo 2026-06-16.55 20.35 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 18 23:27 tns_transients_list.txt Discovery image 3 2026 08 19.18024 2461271.68024 7.65 12:36:23.22 +59:29:13.3 1942 4377 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_232128_TTUQ1b1x1_867858_ZTWVvMNZ/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_23-19-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0109.fits
