This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 18.4637* 05 21 07.65 +23 38 19.6 9.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
N Tau,2461270.9637,9.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
N Tau 20260818.4637 9.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 18.4637* 05 21 07.66 +23 38 19.5 9.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
N Tau,2461270.9637,9.50,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
N Tau 20260818.4637 9.50CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4637 2461270.9637 14.11 05:35:48.81 +22:25:31.9
184.36769 -5.31405 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 5.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.566 Stereoskopia 0 -1 1 14.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:35:48.81 +22:25:31.9: 15.98 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:35:48.81 +22:25:31.9: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.98 +/- 0.27
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 18.4637* 05 35 48.81 +22 25 31.9 14.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9637,14.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4637 14.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4637 2461270.9637 14.20 05:26:28.52 +20:07:17.6
185.13950 -8.38860 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 5.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.377 Campania 0 -0 0 14.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:26:28.52 +20:07:17.6: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:26:28.52 +20:07:17.6: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 18.4637* 05 26 28.52 +20 07 17.6 14.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9637,14.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4637 14.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4637 2461270.9637 14.64 05:19:01.54 +21:14:01.0
183.22810 -9.22819 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.268 Adorea 1 -0 1 14.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:19:01.54 +21:14:01.0: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:19:01.54 +21:14:01.0: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 18.4637* 05 19 01.54 +21 14 01.0 14.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9637,14.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4637 14.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461270.96396181 18.08.2026 11:07:56.300 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 18715
Objects passed selection criteria: 18620
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13793
Average stars matched: 13131.8 (95.2059 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 243540 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 18 06:37:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461270.96396181 18.08.2026 11:07:56.300 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 157
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 47 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 143529
Objects passed selection criteria: 143080
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 108893
Average stars matched: 101863 (93.5443 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 603816 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 18 06:40:59 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461270.96340071
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:18.782 +21:59:53.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:18.782 +21:59:53.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0033 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:16.352 +21:59:51.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:16.352 +21:59:51.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0126 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:18.782 +21:59:53.00
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:16.352 +21:59:51.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00940 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XWf5flXZfu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QahR4T7eRW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits &> /tmp/tmp.u42t0k2vCT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yjqc1Izt3j
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.969200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.969200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec +16.4876 to +27.3008 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec 16.4876 to 27.3008 deg
Loaded 12329 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8847 out of 10017 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10017 out of 20916 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.2 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.XWf5flXZfu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2479, bad_region=3694, passed=22997
Got 22997 stars (including 17090 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4775 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4774 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4705 stars left (next iteration limit 5175)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4705 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=1788 n_q2=376 n_q3=1844 n_q4=697 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.193
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QahR4T7eRW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2320, bad_region=3377, passed=20916
Got 20916 stars (including 15475 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4776 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4707 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4707 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4777 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4708 stars left (next iteration limit 5177)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4708 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.402 n_q1=1784 n_q2=371 n_q3=1863 n_q4=690 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.u42t0k2vCT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=965, bad_region=4444, passed=13942
Got 13942 stars (including 8819 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13942 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4792 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4711 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10441 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4792 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10441 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10441 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4713 stars left (next iteration limit 5182)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4713 robust_rms=7.122 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.494 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4713 robust_rms=0.462 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.622 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4713 robust_rms=0.415 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.483 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4713 robust_rms_before=0.892 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.498 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.415 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.561 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.483
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:18.744 +21:59:52.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 13942 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3890207.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.892 -> 0.415 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits N_match=4713 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.528 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.415 n_q1=1234 n_q2=1289 n_q3=939 n_q4=1251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.179
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yjqc1Izt3j (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=935, bad_region=4344, passed=13477
Got 13477 stars (including 8494 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13477 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4795 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4713 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4794 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4713 stars left (next iteration limit 5183)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4713 robust_rms=7.181 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.602 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4713 robust_rms=0.485 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.664 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4713 robust_rms=0.427 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.492 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4713 robust_rms_before=0.935 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.507 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.427 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.577 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.492
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:16.316 +21:59:50.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 13477 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3890157.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.935 -> 0.427 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits N_match=4713 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.561 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.443 n_q1=1248 n_q2=1285 n_q3=932 n_q4=1248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.204
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.386 worst_q_ratio=1.193
ref2=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits sigma_overall=0.515 worst_q_ratio=1.175
new1=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits sigma_overall=0.447 worst_q_ratio=1.179
new2=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits sigma_overall=0.466 worst_q_ratio=1.204
reference average sigma_overall=0.4505 worst_q_ratio=1.184
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (4705 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_astrometric_residuals.png (4708 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556_astrometric_residuals.png (4713 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557_astrometric_residuals.png (4713 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 111s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30738_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
Preparing report for the candidate 30738_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32298_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 32298_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:09.65 +19:28:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.35 +17:54:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 112s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:18.744 +21:59:52.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:18.744 +21:59:52.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0035 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:16.316 +21:59:50.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:16.316 +21:59:50.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0127 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:18.744 +21:59:52.34
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:16.316 +21:59:50.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00939 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kE1Dvk7Lla
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TuoGj5kvms
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vicdKbIcEd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits &> /tmp/tmp.viwDg63aAS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 163013 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec +16.4845 to +27.3051 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec 16.4845 to 27.3051 deg
Loaded 12419 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7184 out of 10475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10475 out of 163013 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 140 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
1.8 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.kE1Dvk7Lla (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=21684, bad_region=23036, passed=167940
Got 167940 stars (including 124901 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4762 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4763 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4714 stars left (next iteration limit 5185)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4714 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=1719 n_q2=437 n_q3=1839 n_q4=719 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.214
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TuoGj5kvms (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=20219, bad_region=22244, passed=162977
Got 162977 stars (including 121992 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 162977 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4706 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4706 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 145759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 145759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4704 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 145759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4704 stars left (next iteration limit 5176)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4704 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.615 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.412 n_q1=1720 n_q2=418 n_q3=1843 n_q4=723 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.238
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vicdKbIcEd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=7553, bad_region=20341, passed=97201
Got 97201 stars (including 71126 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 97201 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4779 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 82396 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 82396 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 82396 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4716 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4716 robust_rms=7.131 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.233 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4716 robust_rms=0.464 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.619 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4716 robust_rms=0.410 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.469 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4716 robust_rms_before=0.410 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.466 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.410 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.478 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.469
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.478 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits N_match=4716 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.450 n_q1=1290 n_q2=1254 n_q3=942 n_q4=1230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.viwDg63aAS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=7387, bad_region=20071, passed=95635
Got 95635 stars (including 70042 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 95635 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4777 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4713 stars left (next iteration limit 5186)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4713 robust_rms=7.294 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.334 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4713 robust_rms=0.480 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.653 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4713 robust_rms=0.419 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.487 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4713 robust_rms_before=0.423 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.491 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.419 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.498 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.487
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.498 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits N_match=4713 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.528 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.577 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.465 n_q1=1288 n_q2=1248 n_q3=937 n_q4=1240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0556.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_063455_TTUQ2b1x1_3882273_pY8GRWIV/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:36:40.06 +19:43:43.4: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:17:56.40 +22:42:11.7: 14.32 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:36:17.00 +22:40:35.4: 14.24 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:36:05.46 +22:20:58.9: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:38:21.07 +23:43:15.1: 14.38 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:41:47.63 +25:43:08.3: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:28:34.09 +22:45:32.7: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:34.83 +19:37:33.4: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:37:29.59 +20:46:07.2: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:36:40.06 +19:43:43.4: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:17:56.40 +22:42:11.7: 14.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:28:34.09 +22:45:32.7: 14.38 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:34.83 +19:37:33.4: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:36:05.46 +22:20:58.9: 13.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:41:47.63 +25:43:08.3: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:37:29.59 +20:46:07.2: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:38:21.07 +23:43:15.1: 14.36 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:36:17.00 +22:40:35.4: 14.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:40.06 +19:43:43.4: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9933 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:28:34.09 +22:45:32.7: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4030 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:34.83 +19:37:33.4: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1563 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:17:56.40 +22:42:11.7: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4562 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:05.46 +22:20:58.9: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0597 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:29.59 +20:46:07.2: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3513 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:47.63 +25:43:08.3: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1004 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:38:21.07 +23:43:15.1: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3442 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:17.00 +22:40:35.4: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0992 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:48.51 +20:15:52.6: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:48.51 +20:15:52.6: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:48.51 +20:15:52.6: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0068 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:41:35.16 +19:47:31.2: 13.80 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:13:30.26 +19:22:18.0: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:37:07.08 +19:55:45.3: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:38:57.88 +25:22:00.5: 14.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:23:46.42 +20:57:55.8: 13.66 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:41:05.24 +25:53:41.9: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:13:35.60 +21:00:10.3: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:20:17.67 +24:43:19.8: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:41:35.16 +19:47:31.2: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:13:30.26 +19:22:18.0: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:37:07.08 +19:55:45.3: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:23:46.42 +20:57:55.8: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:38:57.88 +25:22:00.5: 14.16 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:35.16 +19:47:31.2: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9040 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:13:30.26 +19:22:18.0: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8390 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:07.08 +19:55:45.3: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5062 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:23:46.42 +20:57:55.8: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9324 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:38:57.88 +25:22:00.5: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0381 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:46:26.65 +25:17:05.7: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:41:05.24 +25:53:41.9: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:13:35.60 +21:00:10.3: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:20:17.67 +24:43:19.8: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:05.24 +25:53:41.9: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5004 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:13:35.60 +21:00:10.3: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5845 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:17.67 +24:43:19.8: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6897 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:46:26.65 +25:17:05.7: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:19:06.26 +17:57:54.4: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:46:26.65 +25:17:05.7: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2951 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:24:11.82 +18:29:03.3: 13.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:34:07.81 +24:25:08.7: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:19:06.26 +17:57:54.4: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:19:06.26 +17:57:54.4: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2415 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:24:11.82 +18:29:03.3: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:24:16.93 +20:08:48.0: 10.45 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:34:07.81 +24:25:08.7: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:24:11.82 +18:29:03.3: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1435 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:07.81 +24:25:08.7: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0283 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:24:16.93 +20:08:48.0: 10.46 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.46 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:24:16.93 +20:08:48.0: ref_mag=10.46 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6675 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:32:02.99 +18:33:59.7: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:45:54.30 +26:06:00.1: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:32:02.99 +18:33:59.7: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:45:54.30 +26:06:00.1: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:02.99 +18:33:59.7: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1681 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:45:54.30 +26:06:00.1: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8725 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:21.60 +25:20:29.1: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:21.60 +25:20:29.1: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:21.60 +25:20:29.1: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4493 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:37:40.11 +22:58:28.4: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:39:21.29 +17:46:53.2: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:37:40.11 +22:58:28.4: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:40.11 +22:58:28.4: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6012 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:39:21.29 +17:46:53.2: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:39:21.29 +17:46:53.2: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6430 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:49:15.08 +17:43:51.0: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:36:20.92 +24:22:00.7: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:31:04.47 +20:26:42.1: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:15.08 +17:43:51.0: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:15.08 +17:43:51.0: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6302 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:37:26.50 +22:27:18.7: 13.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:36:20.92 +24:22:00.7: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:20.92 +24:22:00.7: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7553 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:31:04.47 +20:26:42.1: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:04.47 +20:26:42.1: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7956 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:37:26.50 +22:27:18.7: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:26.50 +22:27:18.7: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8690 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:47:37.28 +23:38:00.1: 13.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:50:26.39 +23:40:37.0: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:36:38.43 +20:13:51.8: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:47:37.28 +23:38:00.1: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:47:37.28 +23:38:00.1: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9197 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:50:26.39 +23:40:37.0: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:34:57.37 +25:53:27.3: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:50:26.39 +23:40:37.0: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9687 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:36:38.43 +20:13:51.8: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:38.43 +20:13:51.8: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8841 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:27:58.87 +21:26:31.0: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:48:20.18 +25:31:32.5: 13.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:35:48.81 +22:25:31.9: 15.98 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:34:57.37 +25:53:27.3: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:57.37 +25:53:27.3: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8704 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:26:28.52 +20:07:17.6: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:27:58.87 +21:26:31.0: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:58.87 +21:26:31.0: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0207 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:48:20.18 +25:31:32.5: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:48:20.18 +25:31:32.5: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1288 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:35:48.81 +22:25:31.9: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.98 +/- 0.27
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:35:48.81 +22:25:31.9: ref_mag=15.98 +/- 0.27 new_mean_mag=14.1028 delta=1.88 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:26:28.52 +20:07:17.6: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:32:21.46 +20:56:50.3: 14.25 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:19:01.54 +21:14:01.0: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:41:51.53 +25:16:16.5: 15.08 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:16:32.20 +20:01:35.9: 14.72 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:32:21.46 +20:56:50.3: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:21.46 +20:56:50.3: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4013 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:19:01.54 +21:14:01.0: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:16:32.20 +20:01:35.9: 14.58 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:16:32.20 +20:01:35.9: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6365 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:41:51.53 +25:16:16.5: 15.02 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:13:05.02 +20:18:42.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:51.53 +25:16:16.5: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7261 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:13:05.02 +20:18:42.2: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:13:05.02 +20:18:42.2: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2398 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out200009.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out200067.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out203724.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 19s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189053_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 189053_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189063_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 189063_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189077_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 189077_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189083_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 189083_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:39.54 +22:48:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189086_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 189086_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189097_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 189097_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189098_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 189098_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189099_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 189099_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189101_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 189101_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189109_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 189109_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189111_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 189111_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:29.80 +18:57:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189114_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 189114_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189117_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 189117_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:44.92 +21:39:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189118_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 189118_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:41.83 +20:11:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189121_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 189121_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:12.18 +18:57:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189122_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 189122_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189123_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 189123_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189124_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 189124_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:55.52 +23:05:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189125_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 189125_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189133_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 189133_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189142_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 189142_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189143_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 189143_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:56.64 +25:28:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189144_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 189144_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189145_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 189145_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189148_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 189148_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189151_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 189151_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189152_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 189152_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:56.29 +20:14:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189153_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 189153_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189154_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 189154_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:58.03 +22:41:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189155_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 189155_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189157_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 189157_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:17.15 +18:20:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189158_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 189158_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189160_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 189160_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:11.03 +18:32:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189163_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 189163_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:45.68 +17:48:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189165_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 189165_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189315_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
Preparing report for the candidate 189315_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190341_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 190341_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:52.04 +19:58:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190742_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 190742_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.11 +22:38:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192479_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 192479_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:11.71 +19:34:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192569_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 192569_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:00.25 +18:59:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192579_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 192579_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:36.93 +25:05:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192695_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 192695_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:00.60 +20:46:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192701_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 192701_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:54.80 +23:40:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192798_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 192798_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:10.97 +20:10:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193151_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 193151_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193420_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 193420_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:37.42 +18:52:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193752_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 193752_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:11.21 +18:40:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193951_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 193951_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:42.22 +23:00:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194040_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 194040_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194179_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 194179_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:27.10 +20:53:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194196_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 194196_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:10.53 +20:05:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194723_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 194723_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:08.60 +20:02:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194746_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 194746_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.81 +19:32:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194871_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 194871_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:29.57 +21:46:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194990_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 194990_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:03.91 +19:09:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195164_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 195164_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:41.26 +20:56:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195319_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 195319_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:14.98 +19:35:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195363_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 195363_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:29.10 +18:44:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195534_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 195534_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:37.91 +18:57:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195549_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 195549_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195582_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 195582_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:51.00 +20:15:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195692_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 195692_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:05.73 +23:11:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196011_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 196011_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:00.22 +24:57:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196029_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 196029_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:20.39 +25:09:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196073_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 196073_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:17.94 +19:46:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196074_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 196074_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:13.62 +25:22:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196195_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 196195_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:17.33 +20:45:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196208_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 196208_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:25.28 +23:07:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196345_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 196345_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:16.20 +21:29:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196406_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 196406_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:11.50 +25:41:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196416_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 196416_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196560_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 196560_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:06.98 +24:22:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196599_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 196599_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:17.90 +23:13:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196664_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 196664_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:27.44 +21:47:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196735_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 196735_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:45.61 +21:24:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196819_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 196819_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:24.57 +22:16:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196859_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 196859_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196870_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 196870_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:44.04 +26:10:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196948_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 196948_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:20.16 +24:24:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196956_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 196956_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:30.36 +20:09:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196993_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 196993_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:30.08 +21:58:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196995_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 196995_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:19.08 +21:33:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197126_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 197126_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:06.19 +24:25:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197304_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 197304_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:51.69 +20:00:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197317_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 197317_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:08.29 +22:06:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197474_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 197474_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:50.23 +25:14:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197552_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 197552_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197566_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 197566_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:37.17 +25:18:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197571_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 197571_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:31.20 +19:46:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197674_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 197674_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:46.61 +22:45:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197756_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 197756_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197796_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 197796_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:56.32 +18:54:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197990_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 197990_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198136_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 198136_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:23.21 +25:19:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198144_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 198144_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198214_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 198214_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:44.72 +21:12:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198231_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 198231_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:22.91 +21:25:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198253_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 198253_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:05.31 +23:57:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198352_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 198352_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:51.92 +23:51:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198446_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 198446_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:27.93 +21:07:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198511_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 198511_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:38.02 +22:58:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198525_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 198525_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:12.06 +19:49:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198572_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 198572_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198622_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 198622_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:31.67 +20:45:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198677_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 198677_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:39.92 +21:50:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198907_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 198907_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198909_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 198909_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199113_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 199113_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:21.03 +23:52:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199175_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 199175_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:37.68 +19:23:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199176_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 199176_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:04.13 +21:09:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199225_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 199225_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:02.25 +24:22:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199243_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 199243_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:42.90 +24:06:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199244_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 199244_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199454_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 199454_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:58.13 +20:38:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199853_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 199853_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:49.80 +22:28:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199958_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 199958_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199998_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 199998_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200009_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
Preparing report for the candidate 200009_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200067_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
Preparing report for the candidate 200067_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200219_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 200219_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:42.85 +19:58:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200536_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 200536_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:22.96 +21:26:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200728_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 200728_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:56.29 +22:27:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200806_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 200806_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:12.13 +25:35:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201193_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 201193_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:17.27 +21:16:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202166_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 202166_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:50.02 +19:23:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202209_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 202209_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:34.58 +21:00:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202335_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 202335_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202658_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 202658_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:34.89 +22:41:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203333_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 203333_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:39.99 +21:19:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203474_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 203474_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:03.16 +22:08:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203724_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
Preparing report for the candidate 203724_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203993_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 203993_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204183_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 204183_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180008_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 180008_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:00.32 +26:13:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113623_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 113623_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:08.59 +20:02:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67291_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 67291_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:32.27 +22:45:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:18.08 +20:22:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.34 +17:54:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25835_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557
The candidate 25835_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-07-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0557 did not pass the final checks
