This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4611 2461270.9611 14.84 04:41:26.85 +29:11:13.2
171.58750 -11.24955 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 5.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.546 Herodias -0 -0 1 14.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:41:26.85 +29:11:13.2: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:41:26.85 +29:11:13.2: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 18.4611* 04 41 26.85 +29 11 13.2 14.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9611,14.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4611 14.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4611 2461270.9611 14.26 04:58:29.73 +25:46:02.2
176.70932 -10.42578 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 5.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.214 Aschera -1 0 1 14.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:58:29.73 +25:46:02.2: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:58:29.73 +25:46:02.2: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 18.4611* 04 58 29.73 +25 46 02.2 14.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9611,14.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4611 14.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4611 2461270.9611 14.17 05:10:08.17 +31:06:39.8
173.92416 -5.18301 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 5.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.984 Gretia -0 -1 1 14.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:10:08.17 +31:06:39.8: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:10:08.17 +31:06:39.8: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9611,14.17,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4611 14.17CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4611 2461270.9611 12.59 04:51:49.82 +27:49:19.7
174.13180 -10.34441 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.63 Ausonia 1 0 1 12.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:51:49.82 +27:49:19.7: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:51:49.82 +27:49:19.7: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 18.4611* 04 51 49.82 +27 49 19.7 12.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9611,12.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4611 12.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
First image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Last image: 2461270.96140094 18.08.2026 11:04:15.041 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 14337
Objects passed selection criteria: 14253
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10633.8
Average stars matched: 9944.25 (93.5159 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 239304 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 18 06:31:16 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
First image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Last image: 2461270.96140094 18.08.2026 11:04:15.041 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 126
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 38 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 114735
Objects passed selection criteria: 114431
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 88990.5
Average stars matched: 82440.2 (92.6394 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 569152 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 18 06:32:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461270.96074185
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:59.920 +30:00:03.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 04:59:59.920 +30:00:03.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0078 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:57.661 +29:59:51.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 04:59:57.661 +29:59:51.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0126 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:59:59.920 +30:00:03.94
Second-epoch second image center 04:59:57.661 +29:59:51.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00889 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.C89miiyW5s
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Jjr1sBmBm3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MfBaOvxKog
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ST3rO3J696
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg
Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.988300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.988300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg
Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2864 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2864 deg
Loaded 8429 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6042 out of 6743 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6743 out of 16349 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
15.4 mag. Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.C89miiyW5s (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1498, bad_region=2648, passed=16295
Got 16295 stars (including 12280 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4802 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4802 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.270 n_q1=2427 n_q2=542 n_q3=1323 n_q4=510 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.062
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Jjr1sBmBm3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1486, bad_region=2654, passed=16349
Got 16349 stars (including 12341 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14119 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14119 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14119 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4797 stars left (next iteration limit 5277)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4797 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=2431 n_q2=544 n_q3=1317 n_q4=505 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.088
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MfBaOvxKog (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=747, bad_region=4366, passed=12147
Got 12147 stars (including 7313 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12147 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4785 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 4786 stars left (next iteration limit 5263)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4786 robust_rms=6.539 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.013 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4786 robust_rms=0.510 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.659 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4786 robust_rms=0.438 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.468 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4786 robust_rms_before=0.983 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.471 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.438 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.509 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.468
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.509 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits N_match=4786 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.484 n_q1=934 n_q2=937 n_q3=1348 n_q4=1567 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ST3rO3J696 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=743, bad_region=4309, passed=11981
Got 11981 stars (including 7217 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11981 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4834 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4790 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8639 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4834 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8639 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8639 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4790 stars left (next iteration limit 5269)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4790 robust_rms=6.601 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=7.952 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4790 robust_rms=0.500 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.656 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4790 robust_rms=0.422 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.447 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4790 robust_rms_before=0.965 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.464 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.422 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.493 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.447
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.493 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits N_match=4790 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.474 n_q1=939 n_q2=933 n_q3=1343 n_q4=1575 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.074
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits sigma_overall=0.392 worst_q_ratio=1.062
ref2=Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits sigma_overall=0.375 worst_q_ratio=1.088
new1=fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits sigma_overall=0.494 worst_q_ratio=1.105
new2=fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits sigma_overall=0.465 worst_q_ratio=1.074
reference average sigma_overall=0.3835 worst_q_ratio=1.075
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362_astrometric_residuals.png (4802 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363_astrometric_residuals.png (4797 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552_astrometric_residuals.png (4786 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553_astrometric_residuals.png (4790 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21414_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 21414_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.18 +32:10:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22343_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 22343_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:05.04 +29:17:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22395_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 22395_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:45.18 +30:20:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22583_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 22583_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:41.18 +33:09:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:59.920 +30:00:03.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 04:59:59.920 +30:00:03.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0078 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:57.661 +29:59:51.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 04:59:57.661 +29:59:51.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0126 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:59:59.920 +30:00:03.94
Second-epoch second image center 04:59:57.661 +29:59:51.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00889 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5Jn712lGZX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TCCAGQYq9e
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AoXly1LX9m
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9c8L7jbbuN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg
Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6872 out of 129003 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.844750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.844750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg
Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6872 out of 129003 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 129055 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.2955 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.2955 deg
Loaded 8479 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4936 out of 6881 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6881 out of 129055 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 104 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
2.1 pix fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.5Jn712lGZX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=14027, bad_region=17069, passed=128967
Got 128967 stars (including 98817 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 128967 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4808 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4808 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 115105 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4807 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 115105 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4807 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 115105 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4807 stars left (next iteration limit 5288)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4807 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.242 n_q1=2304 n_q2=551 n_q3=1396 n_q4=556 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.069
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TCCAGQYq9e (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=35, blended=13827, bad_region=17077, passed=129020
Got 129020 stars (including 99020 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 129020 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4835 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 115170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4835 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 115170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 115170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4803 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=2300 n_q2=559 n_q3=1387 n_q4=557 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.066
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AoXly1LX9m (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=7007, bad_region=20075, passed=88097
Got 88097 stars (including 63180 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 88097 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4829 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4799 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73651 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73651 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73651 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4799 stars left (next iteration limit 5278)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4799 robust_rms=6.445 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=7.975 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4799 robust_rms=0.521 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.668 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4799 robust_rms=0.441 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.476 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4799 robust_rms_before=0.975 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.459 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.441 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.493 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.476
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.493 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits N_match=4799 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.526 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.464 n_q1=978 n_q2=957 n_q3=1358 n_q4=1506 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.098
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9c8L7jbbuN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=6894, bad_region=19831, passed=86448
Got 86448 stars (including 61828 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 86448 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72219 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72219 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72219 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4799 stars left (next iteration limit 5277)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4799 robust_rms=6.479 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=7.759 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4799 robust_rms=0.509 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.661 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4799 robust_rms=0.428 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.460 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4799 robust_rms_before=0.957 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.454 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.428 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.483 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.460
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.483 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits N_match=4799 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.458 n_q1=972 n_q2=956 n_q3=1351 n_q4=1520 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.079
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-03-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_062907_TTUQ2b1x1_3551902_LkDAkhQM/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:03:39.95 +29:58:02.9: 14.68 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:07:04.00 +32:27:47.4: 15.01 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:05:43.57 +25:57:24.3: 14.44 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:54:43.72 +28:22:32.9: 15.14 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:41:26.85 +29:11:13.2: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:15:43.20 +30:14:59.5: 14.77 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:41:03.16 +27:37:01.1: 15.08 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:07:41.11 +30:45:00.8: 14.67 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:02:07.39 +30:14:15.6: 14.95 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:40:42.25 +32:42:30.1: 14.31 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:03:39.95 +29:58:02.9: 14.61 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:02:07.39 +30:14:15.6: 14.93 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:54:43.72 +28:22:32.9: 15.14 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:07:41.11 +30:45:00.8: 14.53 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:41:03.16 +27:37:01.1: 15.09 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:05:43.57 +25:57:24.3: 14.47 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:07:04.00 +32:27:47.4: 14.98 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:15:43.20 +30:14:59.5: 15.06 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:41:26.85 +29:11:13.2: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:03:39.95 +29:58:02.9: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.7889 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:43.72 +28:22:32.9: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9893 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:02:07.39 +30:14:15.6: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8524 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:41.11 +30:45:00.8: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5351 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:04.00 +32:27:47.4: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=15.0417 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:15:43.20 +30:14:59.5: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7399 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:43.57 +25:57:24.3: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4412 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:41:03.16 +27:37:01.1: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8756 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:40:42.25 +32:42:30.1: 14.27 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:42.25 +32:42:30.1: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.5934 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:52:46.33 +32:42:03.8: 14.47 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:01:57.17 +29:41:39.4: 14.14 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:06:09.57 +33:58:31.5: 14.25 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:14:19.52 +33:19:40.3: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:12:51.40 +30:44:16.7: 14.05 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:41:09.74 +28:51:30.4: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:16:24.93 +33:19:21.7: 13.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:52:46.33 +32:42:03.8: 14.38 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:01:57.17 +29:41:39.4: 14.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:14:19.52 +33:19:40.3: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:06:09.57 +33:58:31.5: 14.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:52:46.33 +32:42:03.8: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6267 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:01:57.17 +29:41:39.4: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.5788 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:14:19.52 +33:19:40.3: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2047 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:06:09.57 +33:58:31.5: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3539 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:12:51.40 +30:44:16.7: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:12:51.40 +30:44:16.7: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3242 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:46:13.10 +32:22:06.9: 13.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:41:09.74 +28:51:30.4: 14.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:41:09.74 +28:51:30.4: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.3964 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:16:24.93 +33:19:21.7: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:16:24.93 +33:19:21.7: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1258 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:00:54.73 +30:38:45.4: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:46:13.10 +32:22:06.9: 13.90 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:13.10 +32:22:06.9: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1883 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:16:24.07 +30:01:23.9: 13.61 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:52:18.12 +31:47:11.8: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:04:36.26 +30:17:54.9: 13.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:43:52.79 +26:43:11.0: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:00:54.73 +30:38:45.4: 13.69 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:00:54.73 +30:38:45.4: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=14.1098 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:43:52.79 +26:43:11.0: 13.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:16:24.07 +30:01:23.9: 13.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:52:18.12 +31:47:11.8: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:04:36.26 +30:17:54.9: 13.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:43:52.79 +26:43:11.0: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6989 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:52:18.12 +31:47:11.8: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7150 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:36.26 +30:17:54.9: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6864 delta=-0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:16:24.07 +30:01:23.9: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8701 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:17:10.91 +32:04:55.3: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:57:42.20 +29:07:14.1: 13.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:17:10.91 +32:04:55.3: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:17:10.91 +32:04:55.3: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2868 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:57:42.20 +29:07:14.1: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:57:42.20 +29:07:14.1: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5412 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:18:44.66 +28:54:08.4: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:12:50.18 +33:40:55.8: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:58:29.73 +25:46:02.2: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:12:50.18 +33:40:55.8: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:55:01.20 +34:10:26.7: 14.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:18:44.66 +28:54:08.4: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:12:50.18 +33:40:55.8: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0646 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:18:44.66 +28:54:08.4: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0088 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:58:29.73 +25:46:02.2: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:55:01.20 +34:10:26.7: 14.10 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:01.20 +34:10:26.7: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1996 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:10:08.17 +31:06:39.8: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:04:43.80 +30:15:53.8: 14.30 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:15:28.02 +30:39:38.9: 14.23 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:54:17.68 +26:49:16.4: 14.46 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:10:08.17 +31:06:39.8: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:55:46.14 +29:20:37.1: 14.24 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:01:59.48 +31:41:13.7: 14.49 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:04:43.80 +30:15:53.8: 14.32 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:15:28.02 +30:39:38.9: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:43.80 +30:15:53.8: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3166 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:15:28.02 +30:39:38.9: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3492 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:54:17.68 +26:49:16.4: 14.46 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:04:14.34 +30:32:38.9: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:17.68 +26:49:16.4: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4477 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:02:21.07 +28:21:01.0: 14.44 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:55:46.14 +29:20:37.1: 14.28 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:46.14 +29:20:37.1: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3346 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:01:59.48 +31:41:13.7: 14.43 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:01:59.48 +31:41:13.7: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3765 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:04:14.34 +30:32:38.9: 14.18 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:14.34 +30:32:38.9: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4846 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:02:21.07 +28:21:01.0: 14.56 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:02:21.07 +28:21:01.0: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4915 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:52:12.83 +31:47:34.4: 14.52 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:05:01.84 +33:53:29.4: 14.77 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:05:14.59 +32:39:17.4: 15.04 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:52:12.83 +31:47:34.4: 14.51 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:05:01.84 +33:53:29.4: 14.94 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:52:12.83 +31:47:34.4: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5937 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:01.84 +33:53:29.4: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8123 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:39:54.59 +32:11:15.0: 15.20 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:13:40.99 +30:03:09.1: 14.65 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:04:43.77 +28:42:55.0: 14.93 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:05:14.59 +32:39:17.4: 15.18 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:43:27.23 +27:19:17.2: 15.02 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:14.59 +32:39:17.4: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8158 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:39:54.59 +32:11:15.0: 15.24 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:04:43.77 +28:42:55.0: 14.71 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:13:40.99 +30:03:09.1: 14.64 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:43:27.23 +27:19:17.2: 15.05 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:54.59 +32:11:15.0: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0258 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:43.77 +28:42:55.0: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6956 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:13:40.99 +30:03:09.1: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7475 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:43:27.23 +27:19:17.2: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9348 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:50:31.50 +29:56:37.4: 15.35 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:42:25.25 +28:28:14.2: 14.98 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:42:25.31 +27:34:17.1: 15.39 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:50:31.50 +29:56:37.4: 15.28 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:50:31.50 +29:56:37.4: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9665 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:55:49.32 +32:06:19.7: 14.74 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:50:59.81 +29:00:12.9: 15.27 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:42:25.25 +28:28:14.2: 14.97 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:25.25 +28:28:14.2: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7130 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:42:25.31 +27:34:17.1: 16.05 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.55 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:25.31 +27:34:17.1: ref_mag=15.55 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.0626 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:55:49.32 +32:06:19.7: 15.32 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:50:59.81 +29:00:12.9: 15.51 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:49.32 +32:06:19.7: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.0078 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:50:59.81 +29:00:12.9: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1171 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:06:22.97 +29:50:22.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:51:49.82 +27:49:19.7: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:06:22.97 +29:50:22.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:06:22.97 +29:50:22.9: the position falls in a bad CCD region (bad_region.lst) on all measured reference images -- cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:51:49.82 +27:49:19.7: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out118900.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out149669.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out157657.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out158366.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149662_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 149662_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149666_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 149666_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149669_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
Preparing report for the candidate 149669_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149674_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 149674_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149681_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 149681_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149685_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 149685_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149686_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 149686_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149702_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 149702_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149703_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 149703_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149711_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 149711_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149717_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 149717_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149722_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 149722_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149730_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 149730_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:10.32 +28:15:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149731_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 149731_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:51.86 +31:01:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149732_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 149732_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149738_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 149738_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149739_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 149739_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:59.00 +29:14:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149741_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 149741_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:32.26 +29:23:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149745_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 149745_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149747_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 149747_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149751_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 149751_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149755_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 149755_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:54.97 +29:50:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149757_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 149757_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149758_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 149758_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:59.95 +34:14:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149761_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 149761_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149765_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 149765_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:37.73 +32:42:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149770_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 149770_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149772_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 149772_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149774_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 149774_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149775_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 149775_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149781_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 149781_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149782_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 149782_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:31.62 +31:29:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151165_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 151165_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:18.06 +33:47:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151778_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 151778_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:46.51 +31:23:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152161_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 152161_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:21.98 +28:31:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152308_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 152308_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.55 +26:10:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152378_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 152378_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:45.96 +26:25:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152617_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 152617_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153019_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 153019_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:28.45 +33:11:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153417_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 153417_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153437_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 153437_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:54.43 +28:18:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153909_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 153909_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:50.00 +29:58:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154020_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 154020_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:18.25 +33:59:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154166_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 154166_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:17.70 +29:45:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154268_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 154268_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:17.86 +33:11:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154555_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 154555_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154562_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 154562_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:31.72 +30:49:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154666_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 154666_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:27.56 +34:00:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154866_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 154866_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:41.84 +30:48:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154918_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 154918_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155488_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 155488_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155928_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 155928_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:22.28 +29:33:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156076_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 156076_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:24.13 +31:04:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156330_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 156330_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:47.76 +30:15:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156705_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 156705_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:53.06 +30:28:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156716_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 156716_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:59.75 +32:25:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156992_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 156992_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:24.80 +29:23:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157030_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 157030_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:41.58 +28:20:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157045_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 157045_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157385_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 157385_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:08.24 +27:11:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157568_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 157568_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157574_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 157574_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:52.77 +32:23:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157657_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
Preparing report for the candidate 157657_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157808_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 157808_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:28.86 +29:11:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157835_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 157835_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:25.33 +31:04:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157837_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 157837_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157945_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 157945_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:36.29 +27:39:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158144_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 158144_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:48.88 +30:10:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158162_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 158162_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:21.11 +29:22:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158209_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 158209_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:23.87 +30:43:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158247_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 158247_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:53.54 +34:01:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158366_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
Preparing report for the candidate 158366_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158423_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 158423_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:52.17 +31:01:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158467_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 158467_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158752_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 158752_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158803_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 158803_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:52.97 +31:14:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158880_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 158880_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158946_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 158946_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158977_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 158977_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160016_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 160016_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160252_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 160252_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161927_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 161927_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161976_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 161976_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162088_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 162088_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162278_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 162278_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:22.65 +30:17:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162431_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 162431_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:47.00 +28:19:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162465_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 162465_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162542_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 162542_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162551_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 162551_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162658_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 162658_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162724_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 162724_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162746_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 162746_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162823_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 162823_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163008_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 163008_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163185_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 163185_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163240_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 163240_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143713_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 143713_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.17 +32:10:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:47.31 +26:45:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128243_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 128243_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:51.40 +28:31:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121914_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 121914_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:38.45 +28:39:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78967_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 78967_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118900_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
Preparing report for the candidate 118900_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108616_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 108616_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:08.17 +27:03:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107207_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 107207_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_06-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks