This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4449 2461270.9449 12.96 07:14:31.92 +22:23:37.6
195.05850 14.86214 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 1.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.521 Brixia 0 -1 1 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:14:31.92 +22:23:37.6: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:14:31.92 +22:23:37.6: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9449,12.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4449 12.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4449 2461270.9449 13.09 07:29:38.80 +24:54:59.7
194.02496 19.02910 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 1.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.145 Adeona -0 0 0 13.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:38.80 +24:54:59.7: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:29:38.80 +24:54:59.7: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9449,13.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4449 13.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4449 2461270.9449 13.88 07:15:28.36 +20:08:52.9
197.27141 14.15373 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 1.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.50 Virginia -0 -1 1 14.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:15:28.36 +20:08:52.9: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:15:28.36 +20:08:52.9: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9449,13.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4449 13.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4449 2461270.9449 13.96 07:13:10.13 +19:12:29.0
197.92385 13.27287 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 1.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.305 Gordonia 1 -1 1 14.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:10.13 +19:12:29.0: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:13:10.13 +19:12:29.0: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9449,13.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4449 13.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4449 2461270.9449 13.96 07:14:05.64 +19:16:38.3
197.95183 13.50034 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 0.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.405 Thia 0 1 1 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:14:05.64 +19:16:38.3: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:14:05.64 +19:16:38.3: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9449,13.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4449 13.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461270.94512628 18.08.2026 10:40:48.911 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 17772
Objects passed selection criteria: 17701
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12112.2
Average stars matched: 11017 (90.9575 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 242292 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 18 05:57:40 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461270.94512628 18.08.2026 10:40:48.911 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 161
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 35 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 121625
Objects passed selection criteria: 121270
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 86582
Average stars matched: 77923 (89.9991 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 574948 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 18 05:59:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461270.94468053
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits
Image size: 941.1'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:25.406 +21:58:43.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:25.406 +21:58:43.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0859 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Image size: 941.0'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:25.309 +21:58:37.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:25.309 +21:58:37.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0860 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:25.406 +21:58:43.88
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:25.309 +21:58:37.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00192 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8OBhHYeTIy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jd7HRQvrWS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aOqKEoZ5tl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PKsjH2krso
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.922900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.922900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4801 to +27.2943 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4801 to 27.2943 deg
Loaded 13972 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10626 out of 11736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11736 out of 23398 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.8OBhHYeTIy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, bad_region=7924, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 14270 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4839 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4839 stars left (next iteration limit 5322)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4839 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=1308 n_q2=959 n_q3=1508 n_q4=1064 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.224
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jd7HRQvrWS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2268, bad_region=7854, passed=23398
Got 23398 stars (including 14073 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4834 stars left (next iteration limit 5317)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4834 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.554 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=1295 n_q2=958 n_q3=1508 n_q4=1073 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.281
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.aOqKEoZ5tl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=618, bad_region=1217, passed=10016
Got 10016 stars (including 8245 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10016 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4787 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9065 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4834 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9065 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9065 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4787 stars left (next iteration limit 5264)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=5.597 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.267 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=0.584 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.623 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=0.500 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.536 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4787 robust_rms_before=1.516 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.529 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.500 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.575 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.536
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.575 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits N_match=4787 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.561 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.538 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.479 n_q1=1799 n_q2=663 n_q3=1680 n_q4=645 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.073
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PKsjH2krso (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=7, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=709, bad_region=1257, passed=10014
Got 10014 stars (including 8117 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10014 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9039 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9039 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9039 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 4779 stars left (next iteration limit 5254)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=5.657 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.041 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=0.574 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.604 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=0.495 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.520 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4779 robust_rms_before=1.533 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.528 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.495 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.577 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.520
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.577 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits N_match=4779 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.568 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.470 n_q1=1805 n_q2=668 n_q3=1661 n_q4=645 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.103
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits sigma_overall=0.379 worst_q_ratio=1.224
ref2=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits sigma_overall=0.433 worst_q_ratio=1.281
new1=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits sigma_overall=0.523 worst_q_ratio=1.073
new2=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits sigma_overall=0.515 worst_q_ratio=1.103
reference average sigma_overall=0.406 worst_q_ratio=1.2525
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153_astrometric_residuals.png (4839 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154_astrometric_residuals.png (4834 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528_astrometric_residuals.png (4787 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529_astrometric_residuals.png (4779 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:42.84 +22:54:43.1: 10.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:35.39 +22:51:40.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:32.38 +23:01:31.3: 11.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:09.79 +22:47:45.0: 10.85 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:32.38 +23:01:31.3: 11.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:35.39 +22:51:40.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:35.39 +22:51:40.1: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:42.84 +22:54:43.1: 10.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:09.79 +22:47:45.0: 10.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:32.38 +23:01:31.3: ref_mag=11.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.3321 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.84 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.05 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:09.79 +22:47:45.0: ref_mag=10.84 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.1760 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:42.84 +22:54:43.1: ref_mag=10.05 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=10.6094 delta=-0.56 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31116_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 31116_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31551_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 31551_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.10 +25:59:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31897_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 31897_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32637_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 32637_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32965_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 32965_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33270_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 33270_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.92 +22:56:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits
Image size: 941.1'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:25.406 +21:58:43.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:25.406 +21:58:43.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0859 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Image size: 941.0'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:25.309 +21:58:37.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:25.309 +21:58:37.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0860 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:25.406 +21:58:43.88
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:25.309 +21:58:37.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00192 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nnMXmFBSJb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uv6GuUsPlz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jjWHq2d542
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2MlsPzroG1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.772750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.772750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 153605 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec +16.4748 to +27.3045 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec 16.4748 to 27.3045 deg
Loaded 14009 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8793 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 153605 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 130 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.nnMXmFBSJb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=17705, bad_region=41121, passed=151473
Got 151473 stars (including 98315 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4853 stars left (next iteration limit 5338)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4853 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=1345 n_q2=911 n_q3=1579 n_q4=1018 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uv6GuUsPlz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=43, blended=17785, bad_region=41723, passed=153562
Got 153562 stars (including 99663 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153562 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4853 stars left (next iteration limit 5338)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4853 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.365 n_q1=1334 n_q2=911 n_q3=1578 n_q4=1030 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.280
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jjWHq2d542 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=5, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=4176, bad_region=5855, passed=68811
Got 68811 stars (including 58953 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 68811 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4821 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4776 stars left (next iteration limit 5256)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4776 robust_rms=5.645 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.057 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4776 robust_rms=0.583 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.611 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4776 robust_rms=0.494 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.526 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4776 robust_rms_before=1.528 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.507 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.494 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.547 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.526
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.547 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits N_match=4776 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.555 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.525 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.460 n_q1=1784 n_q2=675 n_q3=1637 n_q4=680 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.095
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2MlsPzroG1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=4177, bad_region=5942, passed=69433
Got 69433 stars (including 59453 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 69433 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4824 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65094 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65094 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65094 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4779 stars left (next iteration limit 5256)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=5.698 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.686 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=0.568 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.581 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=0.488 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.510 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4779 robust_rms_before=1.537 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.506 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.488 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.537 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.510
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.537 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits N_match=4779 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.535 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.455 n_q1=1797 n_q2=679 n_q3=1631 n_q4=672 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.086
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0528.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055516_TTUQ2b1x1_1689777_IF6py41l/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:46.24 +23:00:06.1: 12.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:14.97 +18:59:02.2: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:03.28 +19:45:49.4: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:24.27 +21:34:50.8: 13.48 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:25.92 +20:54:37.5: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:13.82 +22:54:53.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:14.97 +18:59:02.2: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:46.24 +23:00:06.1: 12.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:03.28 +19:45:49.4: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:25.92 +20:54:37.5: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:38:24.27 +21:34:50.8: 13.40 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:14.97 +18:59:02.2: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8681 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:03.28 +19:45:49.4: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5924 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:25.92 +20:54:37.5: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1945 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:38:24.27 +21:34:50.8: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2571 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:54.81 +22:50:50.8: 10.82 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:13.82 +22:54:53.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:13.82 +22:54:53.6: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:35.08 +19:24:26.3: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:54.81 +22:50:50.8: 10.82 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.82 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:54.81 +22:50:50.8: ref_mag=10.82 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.5129 delta=-1.69 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:41:40.15 +23:05:34.2: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:28:31.08 +20:04:44.2: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:46.73 +23:15:29.5: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:35.08 +19:24:26.3: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:35.08 +19:24:26.3: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4631 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:40.84 +22:57:36.0: 12.40 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:41:40.15 +23:05:34.2: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:28:31.08 +20:04:44.2: 12.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:41:40.15 +23:05:34.2: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4057 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:28:31.08 +20:04:44.2: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4074 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:40:46.73 +23:15:29.5: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:40:46.73 +23:15:29.5: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5212 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:40.84 +22:57:36.0: 12.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.35
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:40.84 +22:57:36.0: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.35 new_mean_mag=12.7787 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:14:31.92 +22:23:37.6: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:00.89 +20:13:25.2: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:14:31.92 +22:23:37.6: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:38.80 +24:54:59.7: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:00.89 +20:13:25.2: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:00.89 +20:13:25.2: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1688 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:29:38.80 +24:54:59.7: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:30:04.25 +18:36:04.7: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:30:04.25 +18:36:04.7: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:04.25 +18:36:04.7: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1412 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:39.61 +22:49:42.7: 12.91 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:29.25 +22:51:11.7: 13.71 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:39.61 +22:49:42.7: 12.99 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:39.61 +22:49:42.7: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=13.5378 delta=-0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:19:40.19 +21:05:53.2: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:29.25 +22:51:11.7: 13.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.34
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:29.25 +22:51:11.7: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.34 new_mean_mag=13.5684 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:18.94 +22:52:12.8: 11.03 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:19:40.19 +21:05:53.2: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:40.19 +21:05:53.2: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5812 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:33.00 +20:12:11.2: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:18.94 +22:52:12.8: 11.07 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.04 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:18.94 +22:52:12.8: ref_mag=11.04 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7555 delta=-2.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:38.16 +22:55:41.1: 12.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:15:28.36 +20:08:52.9: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:17:28.58 +23:06:49.0: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:29:33.00 +20:12:11.2: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:33.00 +20:12:11.2: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5941 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:38.16 +22:55:41.1: 12.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:15:28.36 +20:08:52.9: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:17:28.58 +23:06:49.0: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:17:28.58 +23:06:49.0: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7105 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:24.73 +22:51:02.3: 12.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:10.13 +19:12:29.0: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:59.30 +22:48:11.7: 12.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:11.34 +21:28:35.3: 14.15 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:00.62 +23:01:52.9: 13.11 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:24.73 +22:51:02.3: 12.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:13:10.13 +19:12:29.0: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:11.34 +21:28:35.3: 14.18 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:59.30 +22:48:11.7: 12.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:11.34 +21:28:35.3: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1410 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:00.62 +23:01:52.9: 13.08 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:00.62 +23:01:52.9: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=14.0444 delta=-0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:01.62 +22:59:22.3: 11.52 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:49.64 +23:02:56.7: 13.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:01.62 +22:59:22.3: 11.53 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.52 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:01.62 +22:59:22.3: ref_mag=11.52 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2140 delta=-2.69 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:41.34 +22:55:55.6: 13.59 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:49.64 +23:02:56.7: 13.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:41.34 +22:55:55.6: 13.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.31
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:41.34 +22:55:55.6: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.31 new_mean_mag=13.8723 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:14:05.64 +19:16:38.3: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:14:05.64 +19:16:38.3: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:30.73 +22:58:32.9: 13.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:30.73 +22:58:32.9: 13.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out171761.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out190802.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out192211.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out192886.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out193222.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out193853.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out182246.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out184615.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191776.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out192284.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out193389.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171761_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 171761_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:46.24 +23:00:06.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.91, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.89)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.695 3368423694978318208 106.44284288003 +23.00158983224 13.9444 13.4565 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.695#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171766_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 171766_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:49.25 +19:58:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171768_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 171768_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171772_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 171772_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171778_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 171778_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171782_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 171782_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:13.52 +23:35:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171783_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 171783_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171787_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 171787_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:00.08 +19:41:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171788_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 171788_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:17.25 +19:25:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174154_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 174154_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.91 +22:56:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174486_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 174486_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:04.57 +22:51:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175360_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 175360_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175635_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 175635_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:19.25 +24:07:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175838_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 175838_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:12.55 +22:52:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176111_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 176111_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:25.15 +22:38:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177176_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 177176_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:57.34 +22:56:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178078_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 178078_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178209_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 178209_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178817_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 178817_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.33 +25:56:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178932_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 178932_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179023_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 179023_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:02.91 +23:03:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179053_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 179053_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:48.49 +20:26:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179135_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 179135_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:46.86 +22:42:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179336_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 179336_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179490_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 179490_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179533_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 179533_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179622_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 179622_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179756_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 179756_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:56.22 +24:55:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179926_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 179926_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179978_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 179978_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:42.47 +21:18:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180197_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 180197_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:06.43 +18:39:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180376_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 180376_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:15.27 +21:47:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180618_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 180618_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:42.16 +22:10:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180634_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 180634_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180709_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 180709_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181075_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 181075_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:08.08 +21:35:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181138_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 181138_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:08.77 +23:56:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181442_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 181442_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:23.14 +22:43:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181954_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 181954_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182014_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 182014_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:50.84 +18:51:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182246_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
Preparing report for the candidate 182246_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182291_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 182291_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:00.14 +22:57:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182442_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 182442_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182614_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 182614_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182853_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 182853_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:45.89 +25:33:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183298_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 183298_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.31 +24:32:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183451_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 183451_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183524_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 183524_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:20.39 +24:26:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184049_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 184049_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:10.18 +22:52:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184132_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 184132_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184143_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 184143_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:17.08 +22:39:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184437_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 184437_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184506_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 184506_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:24.59 +22:49:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184558_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 184558_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184615_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
Preparing report for the candidate 184615_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184818_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 184818_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185081_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 185081_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:49.45 +24:54:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185209_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 185209_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185253_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 185253_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:26.10 +22:50:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185333_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 185333_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185491_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 185491_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.12 +22:57:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185581_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 185581_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.92 +22:49:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185656_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 185656_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185703_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 185703_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185755_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 185755_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.02 +20:06:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185789_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 185789_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:55.34 +21:31:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185951_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 185951_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:50.47 +25:56:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185993_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 185993_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:10.40 +21:54:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186041_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 186041_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186215_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 186215_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:45.62 +20:26:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186253_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 186253_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:03.44 +19:28:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186286_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 186286_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186493_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 186493_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:41.03 +21:33:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186532_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 186532_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:37.93 +20:47:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186542_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 186542_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186793_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 186793_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:40.69 +20:31:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186884_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 186884_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186988_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 186988_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:26.95 +19:37:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187116_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 187116_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:53.34 +20:16:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187316_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 187316_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:22.66 +20:00:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187474_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 187474_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187691_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 187691_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:09.37 +19:03:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187989_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 187989_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.43 +20:05:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187999_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 187999_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188108_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 188108_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:30.18 +22:57:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188115_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 188115_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:40.59 +21:21:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188116_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 188116_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:40.99 +22:08:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188369_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 188369_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188395_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 188395_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:33.69 +22:39:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188488_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 188488_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188504_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 188504_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188661_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 188661_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188701_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 188701_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:35.77 +24:19:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188769_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 188769_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188909_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 188909_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189274_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 189274_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:37.83 +19:20:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189326_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 189326_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.16 +22:51:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189566_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 189566_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189785_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 189785_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189829_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 189829_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189894_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 189894_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:01.68 +21:27:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190267_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 190267_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190502_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 190502_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.77 +22:50:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190752_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 190752_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190802_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 190802_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:38.16 +22:55:41.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.04, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.02)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.242 3368420636961607552 106.40889011415 +22.92775347786 14.0563 13.6357 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.242#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190934_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 190934_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191169_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 191169_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191776_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
Preparing report for the candidate 191776_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191870_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 191870_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192057_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 192057_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:02.65 +19:56:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192147_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 192147_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192177_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 192177_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192211_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 192211_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:24.73 +22:51:02.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.02, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.00)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.792 3368230249651082880 106.60300083634 +22.85085573251 13.9109 13.4711 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.792#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192284_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
Preparing report for the candidate 192284_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192805_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 192805_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192886_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 192886_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:59.30 +22:48:11.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.11, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.09)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.759 3368228359865491200 106.49731124917 +22.80323330507 14.0232 13.6048 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.759#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192933_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 192933_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192974_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 192974_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:24.52 +19:09:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193204_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 193204_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193222_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 193222_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.64 +23:02:56.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.19, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.17)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.913 3368423935496480768 106.45706541674 +23.04921995993 14.0925 13.4686 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.913#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193247_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 193247_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193257_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 193257_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193389_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
Preparing report for the candidate 193389_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193744_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 193744_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193853_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 193853_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:30.73 +22:58:32.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.24, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.22)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.219 3368423213941984384 106.37817681810 +22.97612043775 14.0755 13.5332 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.219#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120103_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 120103_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:21.42 +18:06:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.10 +25:59:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163170_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 163170_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:34.66 +24:13:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74288_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 74288_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96873_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529
The candidate 96873_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0529 did not pass the final checks
