This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4151 2461270.9151 12.66 06:34:44.08 +32:11:12.0
182.18143 10.83879 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.250 Bettina 0 -1 1 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:34:44.08 +32:11:12.0: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:34:44.08 +32:11:12.0: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9151,12.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4151 12.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4151 2461270.9151 13.20 06:46:48.13 +25:40:15.3
189.32283 10.44600 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.111 Ate -0 -0 0 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:46:48.13 +25:40:15.3: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:46:48.13 +25:40:15.3: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9151,13.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4151 13.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4151 2461270.9151 13.27 06:44:05.04 +31:05:54.2
184.04403 12.18511 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.141 Lumen -0 -0 0 13.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:44:05.04 +31:05:54.2: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:44:05.04 +31:05:54.2: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9151,13.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4151 13.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4151 2461270.9151 11.78 06:46:32.83 +32:57:16.4
182.52642 13.42120 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.89 Julia 0 0 0 11.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:46:32.83 +32:57:16.4: 15.71 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:46:32.83 +32:57:16.4: 16.03 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.81 +/- 0.18
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9151,11.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4151 11.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461270.91551453 18.08.2026 09:58:10.455 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 18397
Objects passed selection criteria: 18336
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 14475
Average stars matched: 14153.2 (97.7772 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 244724 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 18 05:53:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461270.91551453 18.08.2026 09:58:10.455 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 140
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 41 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 131478
Objects passed selection criteria: 131196
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 107572
Average stars matched: 104053 (96.7285 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 604776 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 18 05:55:05 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461270.91475182
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
Image size: 941.0'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:09.646 +29:59:26.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 07:00:09.646 +29:59:26.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0339 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
Image size: 940.8'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:12.735 +29:58:55.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 07:00:12.735 +29:58:55.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0466 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:00:09.646 +29:59:26.33
Second-epoch second image center 07:00:12.735 +29:58:55.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01399 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xzw3gsWD9g
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Zgd16hxjLV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Nv8pDI6ol4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5EFrVLIQWR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec +24.1612 to +35.3654 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec 24.1612 to 35.3654 deg
Loaded 15250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10848 out of 11975 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11975 out of 24243 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.903450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.903450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec +24.1612 to +35.3654 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec 24.1612 to 35.3654 deg
Loaded 15250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10848 out of 11975 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11975 out of 24243 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2298 to 114.2895 deg, Dec +24.1920 to +35.3691 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2298 to 114.2895 deg, Dec 24.1920 to 35.3691 deg
Loaded 15195 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10824 out of 11955 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11955 out of 24037 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.xzw3gsWD9g (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2293, bad_region=4438, passed=24243
Got 24243 stars (including 17882 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4829 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4768 stars left (next iteration limit 5245)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=4768 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=1752 n_q2=820 n_q3=1429 n_q4=767 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.195
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Zgd16hxjLV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2282, bad_region=4407, passed=24037
Got 24037 stars (including 17688 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20608 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20608 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20608 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4768 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=4768 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=1744 n_q2=821 n_q3=1437 n_q4=766 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.161
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Nv8pDI6ol4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=609, bad_region=1424, passed=10818
Got 10818 stars (including 8860 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10818 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4756 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4756 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4757 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4757 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 4757 stars left (next iteration limit 5231)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4757 robust_rms=6.036 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.572 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4757 robust_rms=0.603 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.649 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4757 robust_rms=0.537 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.576 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4757 robust_rms_before=1.669 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.543 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.537 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.566 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.576
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.566 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits N_match=4757 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.588 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.543 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.547 n_q1=1871 n_q2=650 n_q3=1526 n_q4=710 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.077
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5EFrVLIQWR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=576, bad_region=1423, passed=10848
Got 10848 stars (including 8885 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10848 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4765 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4833 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 4762 stars left (next iteration limit 5238)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4762 robust_rms=6.063 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.553 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4762 robust_rms=0.635 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.674 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4762 robust_rms=0.529 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.553 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4762 robust_rms_before=1.617 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.550 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.529 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.587 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.553
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.587 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits N_match=4762 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.553 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.624 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.552 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.513 n_q1=1874 n_q2=659 n_q3=1525 n_q4=704 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.128
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits sigma_overall=0.404 worst_q_ratio=1.195
ref2=Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits sigma_overall=0.394 worst_q_ratio=1.161
new1=fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits sigma_overall=0.546 worst_q_ratio=1.077
new2=fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits sigma_overall=0.553 worst_q_ratio=1.128
reference average sigma_overall=0.399 worst_q_ratio=1.178
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226_astrometric_residuals.png (4768 matched stars from wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227_astrometric_residuals.png (4768 matched stars from wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480_astrometric_residuals.png (4757 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481_astrometric_residuals.png (4762 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31242_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 31242_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.94 +31:35:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13804_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 13804_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:07.26 +30:16:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03075_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 03075_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:33.91 +25:59:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
Image size: 941.0'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:09.646 +29:59:26.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 07:00:09.646 +29:59:26.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0339 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
Image size: 940.8'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:12.735 +29:58:55.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 07:00:12.735 +29:58:55.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0466 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:00:09.646 +29:59:26.33
Second-epoch second image center 07:00:12.735 +29:58:55.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01399 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uTIIjbMzrb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4aJVEn0CyE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ATGgC2XWPq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uFUfInMdzv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec +24.1432 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec 24.1432 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15347 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8758 out of 12241 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12241 out of 167542 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.764400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.764400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec +24.1432 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec 24.1432 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15347 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8758 out of 12241 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12241 out of 167542 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 166985 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2096 to 114.3128 deg, Dec +24.1626 to +35.3760 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2096 to 114.3128 deg, Dec 24.1626 to 35.3760 deg
Loaded 15290 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8659 out of 12225 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12225 out of 166985 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 104 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.uTIIjbMzrb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=38, blended=20873, bad_region=23130, passed=167504
Got 167504 stars (including 125190 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167504 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4808 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4773 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 149932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4809 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 149932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 149932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4772 stars left (next iteration limit 5250)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=4772 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1652 n_q2=856 n_q3=1476 n_q4=788 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.233
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4aJVEn0CyE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=45, blended=20907, bad_region=23158, passed=166940
Got 166940 stars (including 124617 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 166940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4801 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 149289 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4801 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4764 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 149289 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 149289 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4763 stars left (next iteration limit 5238)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=4763 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.289 n_q1=1663 n_q2=845 n_q3=1465 n_q4=790 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.256
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ATGgC2XWPq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=5012, bad_region=6837, passed=78439
Got 78439 stars (including 66914 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 78439 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4811 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4755 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4755 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4813 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4754 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4754 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4754 stars left (next iteration limit 5230)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4754 robust_rms=5.949 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.330 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4754 robust_rms=0.607 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.646 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4754 robust_rms=0.542 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.593 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4754 robust_rms_before=1.673 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.546 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.542 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.582 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.593
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.582 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits N_match=4754 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.547 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.551 n_q1=1885 n_q2=651 n_q3=1507 n_q4=711 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.071
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uFUfInMdzv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=5221, bad_region=6913, passed=80076
Got 80076 stars (including 68207 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 80076 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4821 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4762 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75017 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4822 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75017 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75017 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4760 stars left (next iteration limit 5236)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4760 robust_rms=6.068 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.342 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4760 robust_rms=0.638 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.677 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4760 robust_rms=0.531 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.557 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4760 robust_rms_before=1.633 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.540 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.531 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.580 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.557
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.580 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits N_match=4760 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.612 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.489 n_q1=1871 n_q2=659 n_q3=1506 n_q4=724 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.126
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-57-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_055117_TTUQ2b1x1_1471404_PkZWV9HF/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:03:43.26 +30:23:20.1: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:45:31.94 +30:31:42.7: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:34:42.95 +28:02:05.1: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:28:55.97 +32:38:32.3: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:39:18.60 +33:32:44.1: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:41:29.59 +33:24:48.5: 13.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:34:42.95 +28:02:05.1: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:03:43.26 +30:23:20.1: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:45:31.94 +30:31:42.7: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:34:42.95 +28:02:05.1: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5706 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:03:43.26 +30:23:20.1: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0596 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:45:31.94 +30:31:42.7: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9828 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:39:18.60 +33:32:44.1: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:52:30.21 +31:21:59.5: 13.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:28:55.97 +32:38:32.3: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:39:18.60 +33:32:44.1: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5540 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:41:29.59 +33:24:48.5: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:34:44.08 +32:11:12.0: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:55.97 +32:38:32.3: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3625 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:29.59 +33:24:48.5: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3759 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:30:53.67 +32:48:15.8: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:52:30.21 +31:21:59.5: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:34:44.08 +32:11:12.0: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:52:30.21 +31:21:59.5: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0920 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:30:29.58 +27:25:19.6: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:30:53.67 +32:48:15.8: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:53.67 +32:48:15.8: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0697 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:46:48.13 +25:40:15.3: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:30:29.58 +27:25:19.6: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:29.58 +27:25:19.6: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1917 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:44:05.04 +31:05:54.2: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:46:48.13 +25:40:15.3: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:44:05.04 +31:05:54.2: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:45:34.00 +26:14:34.6: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:45:34.00 +26:14:34.6: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:45:34.00 +26:14:34.6: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4439 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:32:54.90 +28:21:21.2: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:32:54.90 +28:21:21.2: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:00:10.68 +34:00:31.4: 13.56 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:54.90 +28:21:21.2: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5300 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:35:05.03 +27:43:18.4: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:00:10.68 +34:00:31.4: 13.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:00:10.68 +34:00:31.4: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3695 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:35:05.03 +27:43:18.4: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:35:05.03 +27:43:18.4: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6933 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:15:41.97 +31:22:25.3: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:15:41.97 +31:22:25.3: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:41.97 +31:22:25.3: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4126 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:46:32.83 +32:57:16.4: 15.71 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:46:32.83 +32:57:16.4: 16.03 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.81 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:46:32.83 +32:57:16.4: ref_mag=15.81 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=11.7723 delta=4.04 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out130001.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out190371.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out190546.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out190551.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190141_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190141_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190143_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190143_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:15.11 +32:18:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190151_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190151_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190163_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190163_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:30.53 +32:59:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190173_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190173_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:18.89 +26:32:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190174_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190174_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:37.73 +30:23:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190189_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190189_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190191_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190191_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:02.87 +28:30:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190194_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190194_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:26.79 +27:25:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190195_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190195_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:02.53 +29:16:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190196_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190196_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190198_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190198_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:57.10 +29:27:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190202_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190202_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:25.92 +31:14:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190204_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190204_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190208_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190208_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:30.51 +33:49:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190209_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190209_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:17.25 +26:53:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190210_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190210_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190212_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190212_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:27.40 +33:36:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190213_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190213_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:47.40 +26:05:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190215_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190215_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190217_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190217_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:23.56 +26:48:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190226_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190226_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:04.44 +26:33:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190227_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190227_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:21.90 +29:19:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190323_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190323_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:43.90 +29:29:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190350_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190350_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:34.08 +28:18:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190355_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190355_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:05.39 +28:00:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190370_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190370_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:39.29 +27:38:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190371_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
Preparing report for the candidate 190371_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190383_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190383_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:00.50 +29:47:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190396_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190396_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:51.05 +32:48:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190421_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190421_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:52.82 +33:40:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190430_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190430_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:16.94 +29:19:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190431_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190431_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:15.60 +27:12:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190444_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190444_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:25.49 +26:07:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190460_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190460_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190464_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190464_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:04.64 +27:12:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190472_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190472_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:37.34 +26:03:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190480_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190480_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190497_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190497_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:49.67 +33:53:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190499_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190499_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:23.47 +26:08:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190524_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190524_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:51.35 +26:54:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190525_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190525_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:49.29 +32:38:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190541_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190541_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:06.83 +32:24:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190546_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
Preparing report for the candidate 190546_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190551_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
Preparing report for the candidate 190551_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190552_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190552_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:05.34 +27:52:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190554_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190554_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:52.44 +28:23:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190564_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190564_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:36.72 +30:31:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190567_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190567_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:25.19 +27:14:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190572_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190572_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:09.17 +27:46:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190574_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190574_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:23.25 +26:58:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190578_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190578_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:35.21 +31:07:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190582_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190582_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:22.97 +33:20:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190597_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190597_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:13.67 +28:32:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190611_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190611_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190612_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190612_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:31.30 +30:38:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190614_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190614_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:30.65 +29:00:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190621_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190621_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:55.33 +26:27:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190628_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190628_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:40.73 +31:22:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190632_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190632_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:20.42 +26:22:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190641_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190641_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:20.95 +30:56:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190643_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190643_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:12.56 +30:33:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190644_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190644_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:02.86 +29:43:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190658_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190658_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:41.42 +25:42:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190659_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190659_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:26.77 +27:59:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190662_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190662_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:13.66 +29:44:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190667_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190667_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:53.42 +26:47:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190670_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190670_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190671_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190671_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:03.12 +27:02:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190672_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190672_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:46.72 +26:19:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190677_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190677_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190678_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190678_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:59.39 +33:13:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190680_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190680_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:28.31 +26:04:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190682_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190682_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190691_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190691_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:04.71 +29:33:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190723_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190723_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:15.27 +27:44:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190726_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190726_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:28.00 +32:38:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190727_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190727_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:20.66 +26:19:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190731_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190731_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190732_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190732_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:41.00 +32:38:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190735_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190735_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190740_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190740_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:26.99 +33:15:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190741_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190741_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:30.74 +32:10:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190742_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190742_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:14.37 +32:50:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190748_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190748_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190763_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190763_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:02.09 +31:30:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190786_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190786_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:39.60 +28:12:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190788_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190788_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:44.01 +31:28:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190848_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190848_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:57.66 +30:51:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190853_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190853_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:18.79 +32:26:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190859_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190859_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:01.64 +31:01:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190936_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 190936_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:30.57 +26:57:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166693_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 166693_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:45.08 +34:06:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180829_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 180829_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (49.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187062_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 187062_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:18.54 +28:38:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80592_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 80592_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:31.43 +29:28:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179521_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 179521_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:15.96 +29:41:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59769_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 59769_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:34.98 +28:06:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146225_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 146225_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.94 +31:35:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32881_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 32881_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:12.38 +26:47:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130001_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
Preparing report for the candidate 130001_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48598_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 48598_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:20.73 +27:15:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20138_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 20138_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:33.91 +25:59:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-58-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks