NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cet-05-Q2b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Reference image   2026 07 21.43905    2461242.93905    11.91    00:13:45.92 -07:48:34.9   6860 4500   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Discovery image 1   2026 07 22.43528    2461243.93528    11.96    00:13:45.94 -07:48:34.7   6863 4500   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 08 18.39959    2461270.89959    11.03    00:13:45.94 -07:48:35.0   2724 1879   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits
Discovery image 3   2026 08 18.40014    2461270.90014    11.05    00:13:45.93 -07:48:34.8   2729 1885   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 18.3999  2461270.8999  11.04  00:13:45.94 -07:48:34.9
 96.40161 -68.71853 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 8.3 pix   
The object was found in VSX
 0"  ASAS J001347-0748.6           
Type: SR
#   Max.           Min./Amp.       JD0           Period
    10.800   V            12.500   V         2456988.80000        122.000000000000   M                            
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:13:45.94 -07:48:34.9:  11.93 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:13:45.94 -07:48:34.9:  11.94 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.94 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 08 18.39959    2461270.89959    12.42    23:47:56.95 -06:53:16.5   6602 1315   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 08 18.40014    2461270.90014    12.41    23:47:56.88 -06:53:16.5   6608 1322   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 18.3999  2461270.8999  12.41  23:47:56.92 -06:53:16.5
 83.37366 -64.76443 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 8.3 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
113 Amalthea                -0      0       0  12.3     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:47:56.92 -06:53:16.5:  15.40 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:47:56.92 -06:53:16.5:  15.49 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 08 18.39959    2461270.89959    12.37    00:08:22.43 -11:13:53.8   3548 3944   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 08 18.40014    2461270.90014    12.35    00:08:22.42 -11:13:53.6   3553 3950   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 18.3999  2461270.8999  12.36  00:08:22.43 -11:13:53.7
 88.37590 -71.15429 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 8.2 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
118 Peitho                  -1     -0       1  12.5     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:08:22.43 -11:13:53.7:  15.51 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:08:22.43 -11:13:53.7:  15.50 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 08 18.39959    2461270.89959    13.15    23:42:42.19 -09:55:31.5   7370 3165   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 08 18.40014    2461270.90014    13.16    23:42:42.20 -09:55:31.9   7376 3171   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 18.3999  2461270.8999  13.15  23:42:42.20 -09:55:31.7
 76.38460 -66.36700 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.3 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
530 Turandot                -0      0       0  13.0    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:42:42.20 -09:55:31.7:  15.38 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:42:42.20 -09:55:31.7:  15.41 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 4

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits
Field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-05-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-05-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 317659 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 317659 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits_preview.png'
Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits

renamed 'Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits_preview.png'
Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 765.4159 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 439.5498 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1193.5584 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 500.6370 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1193.2036 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 499.6447 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.55936 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 21.1700000762939 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-18T04:35:14.3151607' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-18T09:35:14.3151607' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61270.3994712383 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-18T09:35:24.2175865' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61270.3995858449 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 359.997625826844 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -9.99998092472444 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 45.685 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 191.832777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.39629154560078 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20435 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20435 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 21.1700000762939 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 21.1700000762939 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 9.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 46.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 904.81 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 39.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.600288 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits :) Spent 0.623599 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 21.3799991607666 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-18T04:36:02.0325383' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-18T09:36:02.0325383' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61270.4000235186 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-18T09:36:11.9358446' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61270.4001381365 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 359.997625785576 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -9.99998093499427 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 45.6505555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 192.111111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.39710895920546 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20435 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20435 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 21.3799991607666 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 21.3799991607666 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 9.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 46.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 904.81 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 39.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.600288 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits :) Spent 0.502913 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/d_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461270.89958698 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:00.256 -10:00:04.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.256 -10:00:04.57 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0009 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits Image size: 936.9'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:02.340 -09:59:26.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 00:00:02.340 -09:59:26.35 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0136 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:00:00.256 -10:00:04.57 Second-epoch second image center 00:00:02.340 -09:59:26.35 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01363 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jP58XUfHnP Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TuTfSWeYho Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wK8BoG8KyL Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hd6AtPrlQp Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.590100 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.590100 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.91 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.68 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.68
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=7.4) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3202 out of 3251 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3251 out of 4358 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=6.5) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.6 pix Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 2.3 pix Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 2.6 pix fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits 2.6 pix fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.7 mag. Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 14.8 mag. Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 15.0 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits 15.0 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.jP58XUfHnP (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=278, bad_region=897, passed=4374 Got 4374 stars (including 3271 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0780, gap 8.0780 to 351.9535 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3184 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3182 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3648 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0778, gap 8.0778 to 351.9539 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3184 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3648 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3648 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 3182 stars left (next iteration limit 3500) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=3182 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.353 n_q1=1080 n_q2=583 n_q3=999 n_q4=520 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.090 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.TuTfSWeYho (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=264, bad_region=887, passed=4358 Got 4358 stars (including 3264 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0779, gap 8.0779 to 351.9535 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3179 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3177 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3631 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0778, gap 8.0778 to 351.9539 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3179 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3631 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3177 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3631 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 3177 stars left (next iteration limit 3494) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=3177 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.249 n_q1=1022 n_q2=571 n_q3=1079 n_q4=505 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.wK8BoG8KyL (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=357, bad_region=1202, passed=5511 Got 5511 stars (including 4069 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5511 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9544 through 0 to 8.0767, gap 8.0767 to 351.9544 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3952 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4561 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9546 through 0 to 8.0771, gap 8.0771 to 351.9546 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4561 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4561 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 3952 stars left (next iteration limit 4347) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3952 robust_rms=6.493 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.043 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3952 robust_rms=0.345 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.377 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3952 robust_rms=0.325 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.355 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3952 robust_rms_before=0.675 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.306 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.325 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.355 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.355 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.355 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits N_match=3952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1253 n_q2=783 n_q3=1226 n_q4=690 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.075 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.hd6AtPrlQp (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=349, bad_region=1194, passed=5408 Got 5408 stars (including 3969 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5408 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9744 through 0 to 8.0771, gap 8.0771 to 351.9744 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3854 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4465 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9747 through 0 to 8.0776, gap 8.0776 to 351.9747 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4465 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4465 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 3853 stars left (next iteration limit 4239) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3853 robust_rms=6.793 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.691 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3853 robust_rms=0.351 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.390 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3853 robust_rms=0.329 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.372 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3 SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=3853 robust_rms_before=1.051 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.320 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.351 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.380 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.390 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.380 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits N_match=3853 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.372 n_q1=1201 n_q2=768 n_q3=1202 n_q4=682 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits sigma_overall=0.357 worst_q_ratio=1.090 ref2=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits sigma_overall=0.276 worst_q_ratio=1.120 new1=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits sigma_overall=0.315 worst_q_ratio=1.075 new2=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits sigma_overall=0.324 worst_q_ratio=1.146 reference average sigma_overall=0.3165 worst_q_ratio=1.105 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021_astrometric_residuals.png (3182 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490_astrometric_residuals.png (3177 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460_astrometric_residuals.png (3952 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461_astrometric_residuals.png (3853 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:04:06.85 -08:18:45.4: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:14:37.61 -07:49:21.0: 11.89 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:13:45.94 -07:48:34.9: 11.93 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:14:37.61 -07:49:21.0: 11.89 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:04:06.85 -08:18:45.4: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:13:45.94 -07:48:34.9: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:04:06.85 -08:18:45.4: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8410 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:14:37.61 -07:49:21.0: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8579 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.94 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:13:45.94 -07:48:34.9: ref_mag=11.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0363 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out03145.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20847_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461 The candidate 20847_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 18.39959    2461270.89959    11.84    00:04:06.84 -08:18:45.4   4174 2175   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 18.40014    2461270.90014    11.84    00:04:06.86 -08:18:45.5   4179 2182   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20860_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461 The candidate 20860_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 18.39959    2461270.89959    11.86    00:14:37.61 -07:49:20.9   2594 1888   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 18.40014    2461270.90014    11.86    00:14:37.62 -07:49:21.1   2599 1894   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 03145_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461 Preparing report for the candidate 03145_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 4s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 00:13:45.94 -07:48:34.9 wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:00.256 -10:00:04.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.256 -10:00:04.57 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0009 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits Image size: 936.9'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:02.340 -09:59:26.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 00:00:02.340 -09:59:26.35 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0136 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:00:00.256 -10:00:04.57 Second-epoch second image center 00:00:02.340 -09:59:26.35 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01363 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NaMtvyarsV Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XJjZ8SBwg1 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kfT7Gyn4LK Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ICwdVof097 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.414650 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.414650 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.83 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.83
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=5.5) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 23415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Loaded 4212 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3459 out of 3633 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3633 out of 23415 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=5.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.4 pix Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 2.2 pix Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 2.5 pix fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits 2.5 pix fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.8 mag. Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 14.9 mag. Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 15.1 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits 15.1 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.NaMtvyarsV (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=913, bad_region=4921, passed=22724 Got 22724 stars (including 17090 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22724 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9459 through 0 to 8.0985, gap 8.0985 to 351.9459 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4836 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18888 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9463 through 0 to 8.0984, gap 8.0984 to 351.9463 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18888 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18888 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 4836 stars left (next iteration limit 5319) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=4836 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=1598 n_q2=928 n_q3=1483 n_q4=827 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.192 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.XJjZ8SBwg1 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=831, bad_region=4531, passed=23408 Got 23408 stars (including 18214 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23408 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9462 through 0 to 8.0901, gap 8.0901 to 351.9462 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4838 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19951 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9465 through 0 to 8.0901, gap 8.0901 to 351.9465 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19951 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19951 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4838 stars left (next iteration limit 5321) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=4838 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=1569 n_q2=893 n_q3=1543 n_q4=833 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.kfT7Gyn4LK (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1477, bad_region=4311, passed=24318 Got 24318 stars (including 19254 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24318 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9293 through 0 to 8.0891, gap 8.0891 to 351.9293 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4821 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4821 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4821 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21052 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9296 through 0 to 8.0897, gap 8.0897 to 351.9296 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4821 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21052 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4821 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21052 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4821 stars left (next iteration limit 5303) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4821 robust_rms=6.426 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.610 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4821 robust_rms=0.360 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.380 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4821 robust_rms=0.338 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.368 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3 SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4821 robust_rms_before=0.672 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.319 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.360 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.369 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.380 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.369 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits N_match=4821 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.356 n_q1=1579 n_q2=924 n_q3=1516 n_q4=802 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.ICwdVof097 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1500, bad_region=4354, passed=24571 Got 24571 stars (including 19452 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24571 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9464 through 0 to 8.0892, gap 8.0892 to 351.9464 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4827 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21265 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9467 through 0 to 8.0898, gap 8.0898 to 351.9467 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21265 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21265 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4827 stars left (next iteration limit 5309) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4827 robust_rms=6.603 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.573 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4827 robust_rms=0.363 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.395 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4827 robust_rms=0.340 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.382 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3 SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4827 robust_rms_before=1.048 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.327 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.363 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.374 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.395 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.374 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits N_match=4827 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.383 n_q1=1573 n_q2=920 n_q3=1521 n_q4=813 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:52:48.96 -06:31:08.2: 13.25 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:00:47.31 -09:01:10.8: 13.67 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:47:56.92 -06:53:16.5: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:13:02.71 -05:59:51.6: 13.80 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:10:28.11 -06:02:08.7: 12.74 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:06:28.89 -13:25:14.1: 13.70 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:09:28.83 -08:29:46.8: 13.67 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:08:22.43 -11:13:53.7: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:42:42.20 -09:55:31.7: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:48:06.69 -07:36:47.5: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:00:47.31 -09:01:10.8: 13.84 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:09:28.83 -08:29:46.8: 13.95 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:08:22.43 -11:13:53.7: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:42:42.20 -09:55:31.7: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:52:48.96 -06:31:08.2: 13.24 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:10:28.11 -06:02:08.7: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:47:56.92 -06:53:16.5: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:13:02.71 -05:59:51.6: 13.95 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:06:28.89 -13:25:14.1: 14.00 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:48:06.69 -07:36:47.5: 13.02 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:00:47.31 -09:01:10.8: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0784 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:09:28.83 -08:29:46.8: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0666 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:52:48.96 -06:31:08.2: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4023 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:10:28.11 -06:02:08.7: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9153 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:06:28.89 -13:25:14.1: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1198 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:13:02.71 -05:59:51.6: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2372 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:48:06.69 -07:36:47.5: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2374 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:44:10.59 -06:10:15.1: 14.37 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:44:10.59 -06:10:15.1: 14.19 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:44:10.59 -06:10:15.1: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2823 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33139.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33203.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34017.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32124_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461 The candidate 32124_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 18.39959    2461270.89959    14.11    00:06:28.79 -13:25:14.4   3836 5268   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 18.40014    2461270.90014    14.13    00:06:28.99 -13:25:13.8   3841 5274   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32127_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461 The candidate 32127_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 18.39959    2461270.89959    14.24    00:13:02.72 -05:59:52.3   2820 0776   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 18.40014    2461270.90014    14.23    00:13:02.69 -05:59:50.9   2825 0782   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33139_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461 Preparing report for the candidate 33139_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33203_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461 Preparing report for the candidate 33203_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33508_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461 The candidate 33508_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 18.39959    2461270.89959    12.88    00:10:28.08 -06:02:08.7   3210 0797   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 18.40014    2461270.90014    12.96    00:10:28.14 -06:02:08.8   3215 0804   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33975_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461 The candidate 33975_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 18.39959    2461270.89959    13.21    23:48:06.66 -07:36:47.4   6574 1756   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 18.40014    2461270.90014    13.27    23:48:06.72 -07:36:47.6   6579 1762   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34017_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461 Preparing report for the candidate 34017_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34153_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461 The candidate 34153_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 18.39959    2461270.89959    13.39    23:52:48.96 -06:31:08.6   5871 1088   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 18.40014    2461270.90014    13.41    23:52:48.95 -06:31:07.7   5876 1095   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35366_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461 The candidate 35366_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 18.39959    2461270.89959    14.05    00:09:28.86 -08:29:47.0   3371 2290   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 18.40014    2461270.90014    14.09    00:09:28.80 -08:29:46.5   3376 2297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35416_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461 The candidate 35416_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 18.39959    2461270.89959    14.04    00:00:47.33 -09:01:10.6   4672 2602   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 18.40014    2461270.90014    14.12    00:00:47.29 -09:01:10.9   4677 2608   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35683_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461 The candidate 35683_fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 18.39959    2461270.89959    14.25    23:44:10.52 -06:10:17.7   7178 0882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-35-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0460.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 18.40014    2461270.90014    14.33    23:44:10.66 -06:10:12.4   7183 0888   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_045248_TTUQ2b1x1_1941463_PVVDfUl6/fd_Cet-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0461.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 00:13:45.94 -07:48:34.9 23:47:56.92 -06:53:16.5 00:08:22.43 -11:13:53.7 23:42:42.20 -09:55:31.7 ########### Completed Cet-05-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 00:13:45.94 -07:48:34.9 23:47:56.92 -06:53:16.5 00:08:22.43 -11:13:53.7 23:42:42.20 -09:55:31.7 ################################################################################### 00:13:45.94 -07:48:34.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) 23:47:56.92 -06:53:16.5 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 00:08:22.43 -11:13:53.7 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 23:42:42.20 -09:55:31.7 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' 00:13:45.94 -07:48:34.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) 00:13:45.94 -07:48:34.9 -- a known variable star Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 00:13:45.94 -07:48:34.9 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461270.89958698 -observatory V36 09:13:27.82 +17:32:32.0 Mercury (-1.5mag) 12:37:26.95 -05:56:18.1 Venus (-4.5mag) 06:18:37.60 +23:42:03.6 Mars (1.3mag) 08:52:01.59 +18:06:43.7 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:55:23.12 +03:06:06.0 Saturn (0.5mag) 04:12:44.36 +20:59:33.3 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:15:25.98 +00:08:22.4 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:27:11.59 -23:33:53.3 Pluto (14.5mag) 14:05:45.33 -18:15:24.4 Moon (-9.9mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Aug 18 04:55 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461270.89958698: 08:52:08.91 +18:06:11.5 Io (6.1mag) 08:52:02.58 +18:06:40.2 Europa (6.3mag) 08:51:50.54 +18:07:33.5 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:51:43.09 +18:08:05.6 Callisto (6.8mag) 08:49:29.45 +18:12:20.7 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:51:59.62 +18:06:53.1 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:49:07.24 +18:08:54.9 Elara (17.7mag) 08:56:10.18 +17:41:37.6 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:54:31.16 +18:19:20.4 Carme (19.0mag) 00:55:34.81 +03:06:00.9 Titan (8.4mag) 00:55:25.68 +03:06:07.4 Rhea (9.7mag) 00:55:54.98 +03:07:01.3 Iapetus (11.1mag) 00:55:38.88 +03:05:46.5 Hyperion (14.4mag) 00:54:32.71 +02:57:59.6 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 18 04:55 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461270.89958698: 19:49:20.34 -16:58:21.5 JWST 11:51:14.00 +47:38:22.3 Chandra 11:28:05.76 -60:35:53.4 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 18 04:55 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461270.89958698 -observatory V36 03:24:29.76 +18:10:09.2 17.6mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 17:59:59.70 -34:31:46.7 14.1mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:03:02.74 -69:18:42.9 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:12:18.38 +33:12:58.7 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 04:11:35.32 +41:20:30.2 17.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:30:05.69 +30:43:21.9 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:53:17.92 +26:21:29.3 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:31:01.38 +28:01:13.6 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:35:40.47 +05:18:26.3 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:14:35.76 -12:42:13.9 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 20:57:55.37 +64:41:29.7 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 15:39:06.45 -13:52:29.3 14.5mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:19:10.32 +31:49:06.6 15.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:05:50.82 +15:32:33.8 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:51:02.63 +43:27:16.3 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:55:25.05 +49:38:05.7 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:22:56.97 -12:53:56.8 15.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:02:27.06 +22:20:06.2 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 10:47:24.99 +20:14:04.5 17.1mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:04:38.44 +01:38:40.4 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:06:21.98 +76:45:44.0 16.6mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:09:49.21 +46:19:55.0 17.2mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:55:23.72 +09:33:54.8 17.4mag A/2026 E1 22:08:44.61 -31:07:05.4 7.0mag 10P/Tempel 11:35:12.58 -04:03:08.2 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 11:28:23.67 +01:18:45.7 17.4mag 63P/Wild 00:52:42.98 -05:53:38.7 15.4mag 65P/Gunn 05:58:14.22 +20:24:52.0 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 20:28:59.61 -24:37:33.9 17.5mag 84P/Giclas 03:09:25.95 +14:20:35.2 16.9mag 88P/Howell 08:21:08.98 +26:11:52.4 16.3mag 93P/Lovas 04:35:41.05 +20:51:14.1 17.3mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 06:29:50.43 +28:58:10.3 16.1mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 09:42:27.56 +24:50:33.4 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley 12:04:19.79 -14:07:56.3 17.2mag 124P/Mrkos 05:51:15.35 +21:05:31.0 16.0mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 06:45:33.98 +18:20:54.6 17.9mag 131P/Mueller 00:00:58.59 +03:13:20.5 17.5mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 03:14:00.59 -18:46:42.6 13.1mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 07:50:40.16 +38:07:01.7 16.0mag 162P/Siding Spring 11:55:57.17 +35:30:59.1 12.0mag 169P/NEAT 03:00:17.77 +09:29:50.6 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:47:49.05 -10:50:40.5 17.9mag 235P/LINEAR 20:17:15.03 -52:15:22.4 17.9mag 259P/Garradd 03:51:48.22 +29:18:56.6 15.3mag 260P/McNaught 07:35:45.22 +37:19:40.2 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:14:21.15 +02:00:09.5 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski 09:10:08.82 +17:52:08.5 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.3K Aug 18 04:55 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 18 04:55 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 18 04:55 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 20:42:19.872 +11:23:33.24 AT 2026wyg 2026-07-27.36 20.362 22:23:18.161 -03:42:46.81 AT 2026wyf 2026-08-02.43 19.8981 23:01:54.687 -22:43:32.99 SN 2026wye 2026-08-02.38 19.1478 21:53:38.707 -07:26:43.02 AT 2026wyd 2026-08-02.36 19.6168 22:49:50.870 -46:36:08.90 AT 2026wyc 2026-08-03.35 17.2 21:36:41.623 +15:19:50.35 AT 2026wyb 2026-07-18.75 20.3 21:50:57.870 +21:21:44.04 AT 2026wya 2026-07-18.75 20.78 14:05:12.660 -00:47:11.60 AT 2026wxz 2026-08-01.61 20.44 04:58:05.316 +09:12:46.13 AT 2026wxy 2026-07-29.49 17.3027 19:55:18.916 +04:09:22.19 AT 2026wxx 2026-07-23.35 20.806 16:04:20.254 -02:01:58.81 AT 2026wxw 2026-07-05.20 20.2659 18:46:54.548 +16:48:18.74 AT 2026wxv 2026-06-24.31 19.7189 23:46:24.941 +43:49:43.79 AT 2026wxu 2026-07-03.43 19.6427 18:51:17.703 +37:10:07.59 AT 2026wxt 2026-07-04.30 20.0164 01:01:55.949 +41:41:30.57 AT 2026wxs 2026-07-01.41 19.2645 14:20:50.231 +61:16:12.38 AT 2026wxr 2026-07-12.22 19.9923 19:31:40.957 -26:44:38.76 AT 2026wxq 2026-07-24.28 19.6734 13:18:44.218 -20:30:38.57 AT 2026wxp 2026-04-17.43 20.98 12:55:43.929 +27:34:40.69 AT 2026wxo 2026-04-21.42 21.19 10:15:49.208 -16:52:33.53 AT 2026wxn 2026-04-22.26 20.69 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 18 04:55 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 83 C