This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.4153 2461269.9153 14.28 02:56:08.91 -11:11:47.3
190.47696 -56.66705 galactic Eri Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 0.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 02:56:08.91 -11:11:47.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits at 02:56:08.91 -11:11:47.3: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 02:56:08.91 -11:11:47.3: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 17.4153* 02 56 08.91 -11 11 47.3 14.3 U Eri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461269.9153,14.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260817.4153 14.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.4153 2461269.9153 14.55 03:15:14.60 -08:10:27.2
190.59024 -51.07537 galactic Eri Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 03:15:14.60 -08:10:27.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits at 03:15:14.60 -08:10:27.2: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 03:15:14.60 -08:10:27.2: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 17.4153* 03 15 14.60 -08 10 27.2 14.6 U Eri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461269.9153,14.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260817.4153 14.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.4153 2461269.9153 14.60 03:10:42.64 -12:24:30.8
195.56850 -54.24924 galactic Eri Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.6" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 03:10:42.64 -12:24:30.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits at 03:10:42.64 -12:24:30.8: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 03:10:42.64 -12:24:30.8: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 17.4153* 03 10 42.64 -12 24 30.8 14.6 U Eri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461269.9153,14.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260817.4153 14.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.67128642 18.01.2026 04:06:29.147 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
First image: 2461058.67128642 18.01.2026 04:06:29.147 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
Last image: 2461269.91558413 17.08.2026 09:58:16.469 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.79
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6042
Objects passed selection criteria: 6035
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5342.25
Average stars matched: 5224.25 (97.7912 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232352 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 17 05:02:57 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.67128642 18.01.2026 04:06:29.147 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
First image: 2461058.67128642 18.01.2026 04:06:29.147 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
Last image: 2461269.91558413 17.08.2026 09:58:16.469 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 144
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 32006
Objects passed selection criteria: 31942
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 28919.2
Average stars matched: 27804 (96.1436 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 254808 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 17 05:03:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461269.91510662
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:43.223 -10:00:20.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:46.418 -10:03:45.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:43.223 -10:00:20.92
Second-epoch image center 03:25:46.418 -10:03:45.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0582 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:46.256 -10:03:45.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:43.223 -10:00:20.92
Second-epoch image center 03:25:46.256 -10:03:45.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0581 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:25:46.418 -10:03:45.01
Second-epoch second image center 03:25:46.256 -10:03:45.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00067 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00067 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DHt1ZvCsCY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9wq8gvATbt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aQ8yA2rOXm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6kP2KXwDQo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits and wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits and wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits and wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits) and catalog (wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6218 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4137 to 59.6162 deg, Dec -15.3099 to -4.5632 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4137 to 59.6162 deg, Dec -15.3099 to -4.5632 deg
Loaded 4698 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3747 out of 3885 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3885 out of 6218 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.821900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.821900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.79
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.03
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.03
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6218 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4137 to 59.6162 deg, Dec -15.3099 to -4.5632 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4137 to 59.6162 deg, Dec -15.3099 to -4.5632 deg
Loaded 4698 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3747 out of 3885 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3885 out of 6218 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 6190 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4138 to 59.6161 deg, Dec -15.3095 to -4.5631 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4138 to 59.6161 deg, Dec -15.3095 to -4.5631 deg
Loaded 4697 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3705 out of 3880 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3880 out of 6190 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
2.0 pix Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
2.4 pix fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
2.4 pix fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
15.1 mag. Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.DHt1ZvCsCY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=433, bad_region=0, passed=6218
Got 6218 stars (including 5781 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6218 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4902 stars left (next iteration limit 5392)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits N_match=4902 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.245 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.232 n_q1=1335 n_q2=1166 n_q3=1291 n_q4=1110 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.172
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits -region wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9wq8gvATbt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=462, bad_region=0, passed=6190
Got 6190 stars (including 5721 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6190 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5390)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.238 n_q1=1306 n_q2=1167 n_q3=1298 n_q4=1129 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.373
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -region wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.aQ8yA2rOXm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=268, bad_region=1, passed=4533
Got 4533 stars (including 4259 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4533 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4178 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4174 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4174 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4174 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4533 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4179 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4175 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4533 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4175 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4533 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4175 stars left (next iteration limit 4591)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4175 robust_rms=11.854 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.905 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4175 robust_rms=0.439 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.483 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4175 robust_rms=0.300 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.331 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4175 robust_rms_before=0.958 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.270 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.300 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.304 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.331
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.304 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits N_match=4175 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=971 n_q2=1109 n_q3=1002 n_q4=1093 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.152
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6kP2KXwDQo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=268, bad_region=1, passed=4553
Got 4553 stars (including 4280 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4553 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4197 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4194 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4194 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4194 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4553 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4198 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4195 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4553 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4195 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4553 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4195 stars left (next iteration limit 4613)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4195 robust_rms=11.743 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.934 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4195 robust_rms=0.396 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.415 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4195 robust_rms=0.281 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.305 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4195 robust_rms_before=0.938 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.261 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.281 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.285 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.305
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.285 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits N_match=4195 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.256 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.257 n_q1=997 n_q2=1106 n_q3=1000 n_q4=1092 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.069
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits sigma_overall=0.259 worst_q_ratio=1.172
ref2=Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits sigma_overall=0.287 worst_q_ratio=1.373
new1=fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits sigma_overall=0.278 worst_q_ratio=1.152
new2=fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits sigma_overall=0.268 worst_q_ratio=1.069
reference average sigma_overall=0.273 worst_q_ratio=1.2725
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132_astrometric_residuals.png (4902 matched stars from wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141_astrometric_residuals.png (4900 matched stars from wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448_astrometric_residuals.png (4175 matched stars from wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449_astrometric_residuals.png (4195 matched stars from wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Eri-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20425_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 20425_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04193_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 04193_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:11:53.16 -11:52:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Eri-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:43.223 -10:00:20.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:46.418 -10:03:45.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:43.223 -10:00:20.92
Second-epoch image center 03:25:46.418 -10:03:45.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0582 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:46.256 -10:03:45.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:43.223 -10:00:20.92
Second-epoch image center 03:25:46.256 -10:03:45.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0581 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:25:46.418 -10:03:45.01
Second-epoch second image center 03:25:46.256 -10:03:45.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00067 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00067 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kiqQaEkOvI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits &> /tmp/tmp.C9UXQNfviB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rybTzxiwkp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fpNdY4Y9wB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits and wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits and wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits and wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits) and catalog (wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 32453 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4019 to 59.6523 deg, Dec -15.3240 to -4.5531 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4019 to 59.6523 deg, Dec -15.3240 to -4.5531 deg
Loaded 4718 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3729 out of 4050 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4050 out of 32453 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.708200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.708200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.17
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.17
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 32453 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4019 to 59.6523 deg, Dec -15.3240 to -4.5531 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4019 to 59.6523 deg, Dec -15.3240 to -4.5531 deg
Loaded 4718 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3729 out of 4050 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4050 out of 32453 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 34379 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4040 to 59.6518 deg, Dec -15.3206 to -4.5415 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4040 to 59.6518 deg, Dec -15.3206 to -4.5415 deg
Loaded 4723 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3706 out of 4049 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4049 out of 34379 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 134 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
1.9 pix Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
2.3 pix fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
2.3 pix fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
15.3 mag. Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.kiqQaEkOvI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1344, bad_region=2, passed=32438
Got 32438 stars (including 31047 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32438 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32438 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32438 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32438 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4902 stars left (next iteration limit 5392)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits N_match=4902 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.247 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.227 n_q1=1312 n_q2=1154 n_q3=1298 n_q4=1138 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits -region wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.C9UXQNfviB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1371, bad_region=19, passed=34368
Got 34368 stars (including 32925 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34368 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34368 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34368 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34368 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4905 stars left (next iteration limit 5395)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits N_match=4905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.250 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.234 n_q1=1304 n_q2=1158 n_q3=1304 n_q4=1139 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.376
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -region wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rybTzxiwkp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=706, bad_region=26, passed=24885
Got 24885 stars (including 24117 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24885 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5386)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=11.158 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.608 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=0.437 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.485 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=0.302 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.330 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4897 robust_rms_before=0.951 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.270 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.302 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.305 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.330
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.305 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.256 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.268 n_q1=1149 n_q2=1248 n_q3=1191 n_q4=1309 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fpNdY4Y9wB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=695, bad_region=29, passed=24801
Got 24801 stars (including 24039 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24801 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24801 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24801 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24801 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5388)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4899 robust_rms=10.860 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.573 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4899 robust_rms=0.397 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.427 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4899 robust_rms=0.282 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.305 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4899 robust_rms_before=0.930 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.263 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.282 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.296 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.305
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.296 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.256 n_q1=1155 n_q2=1243 n_q3=1194 n_q4=1307 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.086
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-57-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0448.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_050049_TTUQ1b1x1_1567109_las3BMNY/wcs_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Eri-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits at 03:13:38.78 -11:10:31.9: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits at 03:06:01.56 -13:25:19.3: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 03:13:38.78 -11:10:31.9: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:13:38.78 -11:10:31.9: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5308 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 03:06:01.56 -13:25:19.3: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:06:01.56 -13:25:19.3: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3908 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits at 03:11:53.96 -11:58:15.3: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 03:11:53.96 -11:58:15.3: 13.75 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:11:53.96 -11:58:15.3: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7130 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits at 03:18:00.35 -10:35:08.2: 14.07 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits at 03:35:55.11 -10:10:29.2: 13.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 03:18:00.35 -10:35:08.2: 14.02 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits at 03:21:44.10 -09:49:02.5: 14.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:18:00.35 -10:35:08.2: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9999 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits at 03:22:30.69 -07:07:00.5: 13.99 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 03:35:55.11 -10:10:29.2: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:35:55.11 -10:10:29.2: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9796 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits at 02:56:35.86 -09:03:00.8: 14.50 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 03:21:44.10 -09:49:02.5: 14.24 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:21:44.10 -09:49:02.5: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0918 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 03:22:30.69 -07:07:00.5: 13.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:22:30.69 -07:07:00.5: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1762 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 02:56:35.86 -09:03:00.8: 14.69 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:56:35.86 -09:03:00.8: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4107 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits at 03:18:59.68 -08:14:23.4: 14.74 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits at 02:56:08.91 -11:11:47.3: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits at 03:15:14.60 -08:10:27.2: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-06-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0132.fits at 03:10:42.64 -12:24:30.8: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 03:18:59.68 -08:14:23.4: 14.68 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 02:56:08.91 -11:11:47.3: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:18:59.68 -08:14:23.4: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4316 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 03:15:14.60 -08:10:27.2: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-42-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 03:10:42.64 -12:24:30.8: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54258.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54263.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54284.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 90s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53344_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53344_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53346_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53346_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53348_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53348_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53410_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53410_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53480_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53480_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53513_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53513_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53520_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53520_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53545_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53545_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53550_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53550_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53576_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53576_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53577_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53577_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53591_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53591_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:31.27 -10:30:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53611_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53611_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53624_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53624_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53629_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53629_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53644_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53644_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53645_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53645_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53666_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53666_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53676_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53676_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53686_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53686_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53690_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53690_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:37.85 -10:50:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53691_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53691_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53697_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53697_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53705_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53705_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53708_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53708_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53709_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53709_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53720_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53720_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53729_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53729_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53731_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53731_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53735_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53735_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53737_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53737_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53740_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53740_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53743_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53743_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:55.86 -05:21:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53748_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53748_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53752_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53752_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53753_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53753_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53760_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53760_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53767_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53767_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53783_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53783_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53785_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53785_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53807_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53807_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53811_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53811_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53813_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53813_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53833_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53833_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53835_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53835_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53877_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53877_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53882_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53882_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53883_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53883_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53889_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53889_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53890_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53890_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53892_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53892_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53897_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53897_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53914_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53914_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53916_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53916_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53922_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53922_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53931_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53931_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53932_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53932_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53938_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53938_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53940_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53940_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53948_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53948_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53956_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53956_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53957_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53957_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53971_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53971_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53973_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53973_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53982_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53982_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53983_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53983_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:03.91 -08:35:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53984_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53984_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53987_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53987_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53996_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53996_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53999_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 53999_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54009_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54009_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54015_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54015_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54016_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54016_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54020_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54020_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54021_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54021_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:31:37.03 -12:27:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54022_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54022_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54038_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54038_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54041_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54041_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54046_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54046_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54056_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54056_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54057_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54057_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54062_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54062_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54065_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54065_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54069_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54069_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:02.11 -06:02:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54070_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54070_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54085_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54085_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54089_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54089_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54105_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54105_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54119_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54119_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54127_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54127_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54129_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54129_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54135_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54135_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54137_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54137_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54138_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54138_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54140_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54140_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54152_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54152_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54153_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54153_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54159_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54159_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54163_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54163_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54166_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54166_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54168_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54168_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54174_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54174_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54178_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54178_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54185_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54185_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54192_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54192_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54203_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54203_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54206_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54206_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54210_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54210_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54221_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54221_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54224_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54224_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54233_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54233_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54234_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54234_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54237_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54237_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54239_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54239_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54250_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54250_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54252_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54252_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54258_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 54258_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54260_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54260_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54263_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 54263_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54265_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54265_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54267_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54267_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54270_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54270_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54271_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54271_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54274_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54274_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54280_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54280_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54281_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54281_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54283_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54283_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54284_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
Preparing report for the candidate 54284_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54285_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54285_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54296_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54296_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54302_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54302_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54306_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 54306_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14649_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 14649_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31047_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449
The candidate 31047_fd_Eri-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-58-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0449 did not pass the final checks