This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.8960,8.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.3960 8.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.3960 2461269.8960 11.62 23:34:47.88 +02:57:39.8
88.38799 -54.68742 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 4.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.236 Honoria -0 0 0 11.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:34:47.88 +02:57:39.8: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:34:47.88 +02:57:39.8: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.8960,11.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.3960 11.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.3960 2461269.8960 11.99 00:14:54.02 -05:20:42.5
99.53652 -66.54286 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 4.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.106 Dione -0 0 0 12.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:14:54.02 -05:20:42.5: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:14:54.02 -05:20:42.5: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.8960,11.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.3960 11.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.8960,8.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.3960 8.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.3960 2461269.8960 12.76 00:19:48.36 +00:55:34.4
106.48433 -60.93138 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 4.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.217 Eudora -0 0 0 12.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:19:48.36 +00:55:34.4: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:19:48.36 +00:55:34.4: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.8960,12.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.3960 12.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.3960 2461269.8960 13.06 00:07:58.37 +00:05:10.6
100.16305 -60.84945 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 4.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.317 Roxane -1 -0 1 12.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:07:58.37 +00:05:10.6: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:07:58.37 +00:05:10.6: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.8960,13.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.3960 13.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.3960 2461269.8960 13.73 23:50:41.22 +01:17:00.5
93.26908 -58.04609 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 4.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.570 Kythera -0 0 0 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:50:41.22 +01:17:00.5: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:50:41.22 +01:17:00.5: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.8960,13.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.3960 13.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.3960 2461269.8960 13.69 23:46:22.37 +02:11:44.3
92.23768 -56.74783 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 4.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.788 Hohensteina -1 -0 1 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:46:22.37 +02:11:44.3: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:46:22.37 +02:11:44.3: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.8960,13.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.3960 13.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.3960 2461269.8960 13.79 23:59:42.25 -01:20:07.0
95.08510 -61.37810 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 4.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.328 Gudrun -0 0 1 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:59:42.25 -01:20:07.0: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:59:42.25 -01:20:07.0: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.8960,13.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.3960 13.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.3960 2461269.8960 14.07 23:56:37.18 -00:30:14.6
94.36726 -60.29963 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 4.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.799 Gudula -0 -0 0 14.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:56:37.18 -00:30:14.6: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:56:37.18 -00:30:14.6: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.8960,14.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.3960 14.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
First image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Last image: 2461269.89626572 17.08.2026 09:30:27.358 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6216
Objects passed selection criteria: 6214
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5829
Average stars matched: 5525.25 (94.789 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232828 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 17 04:32:07 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
First image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Last image: 2461269.89626572 17.08.2026 09:30:27.358 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 260
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 30372
Objects passed selection criteria: 30266
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 28769.2
Average stars matched: 27393 (95.2162 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 255732 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 17 04:32:59 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461269.89573410
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:46.213 -01:56:37.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62
Second-epoch image center 23:59:46.213 -01:56:37.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0850 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:47.573 -01:56:20.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62
Second-epoch image center 23:59:47.573 -01:56:20.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0849 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:59:46.213 -01:56:37.84
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:47.573 -01:56:20.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00749 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0CewJBYJnj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.K6itkybDPI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YE0HsilSiK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uFN7ZeJAZN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 5537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to +3.2742 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to 3.2742 deg
Loaded 113496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3443 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 5537 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.638200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.638200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.01
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.01
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 5537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to +3.2742 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to 3.2742 deg
Loaded 113496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3443 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 5537 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (aperture=6.4)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 5464 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1355 to 7.8705 deg, Dec -7.2684 to +3.2771 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1355 to 7.8705 deg, Dec -7.2684 to 3.2771 deg
Loaded 113493 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3322 out of 3420 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3420 out of 5464 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
2.2 pix Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
3.0 pix fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
3.0 pix fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
15.0 mag. Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.0CewJBYJnj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=342, bad_region=0, passed=5537
Got 5537 stars (including 5189 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5537 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1391 through 0 to 7.8851, gap 7.8851 to 352.1391
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1393 through 0 to 7.8849, gap 7.8849 to 352.1393
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5379)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.323 n_q1=1237 n_q2=1170 n_q3=1280 n_q4=1203 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.085
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits -region wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.K6itkybDPI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=354, bad_region=0, passed=5461
Got 5461 stars (including 5101 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5461 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1355 through 0 to 7.8705, gap 7.8705 to 352.1355
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5461 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1357 through 0 to 7.8704, gap 7.8704 to 352.1357
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5461 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5461 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4883 stars left (next iteration limit 5372)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits N_match=4883 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.354 n_q1=1244 n_q2=1180 n_q3=1267 n_q4=1192 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.116
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits -region wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YE0HsilSiK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=312, bad_region=0, passed=6236
Got 6236 stars (including 5923 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6236 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8292 through 0 to 8.1066, gap 8.1066 to 351.8292
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6236 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8293 through 0 to 8.1072, gap 8.1072 to 351.8293
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6236 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6236 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4886 stars left (next iteration limit 5373)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=9.752 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.017 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=0.346 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.388 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=0.275 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.287 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4886 robust_rms_before=1.026 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.269 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.275 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.284 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.287
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.284 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits N_match=4886 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=1235 n_q2=1267 n_q3=1156 n_q4=1228 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.056
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uFN7ZeJAZN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=304, bad_region=0, passed=6264
Got 6264 stars (including 5955 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6264 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8292 through 0 to 8.1067, gap 8.1067 to 351.8292
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6264 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8293 through 0 to 8.1073, gap 8.1073 to 351.8293
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6264 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6264 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4889 stars left (next iteration limit 5376)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=9.656 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.647 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=0.365 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.399 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=0.283 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.291 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4889 robust_rms_before=1.040 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.266 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.283 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.279 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.291
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.279 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits N_match=4889 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.282 n_q1=1225 n_q2=1262 n_q3=1168 n_q4=1234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.080
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits sigma_overall=0.322 worst_q_ratio=1.085
ref2=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits sigma_overall=0.364 worst_q_ratio=1.116
new1=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits sigma_overall=0.272 worst_q_ratio=1.056
new2=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits sigma_overall=0.274 worst_q_ratio=1.080
reference average sigma_overall=0.343 worst_q_ratio=1.1005
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999_astrometric_residuals.png (4890 matched stars from wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000_astrometric_residuals.png (4883 matched stars from wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420_astrometric_residuals.png (4886 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421_astrometric_residuals.png (4889 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:01:53.62 -00:48:58.1: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:34:47.88 +02:57:39.8: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:55:16.60 -02:28:32.7: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:05:51.71 -01:44:34.3: 11.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:51:14.97 -02:45:49.8: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:14:54.02 -05:20:42.5: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:55:16.60 -02:28:32.7: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:51:14.97 -02:45:49.8: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:14:54.02 -05:20:42.5: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:01:53.62 -00:48:58.1: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:34:47.88 +02:57:39.8: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:05:51.71 -01:44:34.3: 11.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:51:14.97 -02:45:49.8: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1284 delta=0.75 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:16.60 -02:28:32.7: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1114 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:01:53.62 -00:48:58.1: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1425 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:05:51.71 -01:44:34.3: ref_mag=11.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7736 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20400.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20441.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20270_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 20270_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20271_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 20271_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:41:11.97 +00:47:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20276_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
Preparing report for the candidate 20276_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20400_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
Preparing report for the candidate 20400_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20441_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
Preparing report for the candidate 20441_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20447_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 20447_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:58:44.43 -01:12:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20463_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 20463_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20464_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 20464_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20465_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 20465_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03946_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 03946_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:44:04.78 +00:22:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Psc-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
23:34:47.88 +02:57:39.8
00:14:54.02 -05:20:42.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:46.213 -01:56:37.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62
Second-epoch image center 23:59:46.213 -01:56:37.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0850 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:47.573 -01:56:20.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62
Second-epoch image center 23:59:47.573 -01:56:20.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0849 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:59:46.213 -01:56:37.84
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:47.573 -01:56:20.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00749 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wuwXHiYpQM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9ZZ8kSMtqm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VYwhdd6tPR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dzoEzCurcc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 29281 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1384 to 7.8963 deg, Dec -7.2757 to +3.2741 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1384 to 7.8963 deg, Dec -7.2757 to 3.2741 deg
Loaded 113505 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3329 out of 3554 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3554 out of 29281 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.536200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.536200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 29281 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1384 to 7.8963 deg, Dec -7.2757 to +3.2741 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1384 to 7.8963 deg, Dec -7.2757 to 3.2741 deg
Loaded 113505 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3329 out of 3554 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3554 out of 29281 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (aperture=5.1)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 30046 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1258 to 7.8769 deg, Dec -7.2751 to +3.2772 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1258 to 7.8769 deg, Dec -7.2751 to 3.2772 deg
Loaded 113502 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3314 out of 3546 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3546 out of 30046 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 230 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
2.1 pix Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
2.8 pix fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
2.8 pix fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
15.2 mag. Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.wuwXHiYpQM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1084, bad_region=0, passed=29266
Got 29266 stars (including 28140 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29266 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1384 through 0 to 7.8963, gap 7.8963 to 352.1384
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1387 through 0 to 7.8962, gap 7.8962 to 352.1387
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5370)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.318 n_q1=1251 n_q2=1169 n_q3=1235 n_q4=1227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.108
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits -region wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9ZZ8kSMtqm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1265, bad_region=0, passed=30031
Got 30031 stars (including 28725 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30031 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1258 through 0 to 7.8769, gap 7.8769 to 352.1258
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1262 through 0 to 7.8768, gap 7.8768 to 352.1262
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4877 stars left (next iteration limit 5364)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits N_match=4877 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.345 n_q1=1251 n_q2=1175 n_q3=1234 n_q4=1217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.133
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits -region wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VYwhdd6tPR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=965, bad_region=36, passed=28284
Got 28284 stars (including 27256 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28284 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7508 through 0 to 8.1066, gap 8.1066 to 351.7508
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28284 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7510 through 0 to 8.1072, gap 8.1072 to 351.7510
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28284 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28284 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4888 stars left (next iteration limit 5375)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=9.991 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.432 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=0.350 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.388 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=0.275 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.294 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4888 robust_rms_before=1.041 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.267 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.275 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.279 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.294
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.279 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits N_match=4888 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=1248 n_q2=1249 n_q3=1177 n_q4=1214 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.062
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dzoEzCurcc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=945, bad_region=40, passed=28361
Got 28361 stars (including 27339 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28361 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7931 through 0 to 8.1067, gap 8.1067 to 351.7931
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28361 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7932 through 0 to 8.1073, gap 8.1073 to 351.7932
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28361 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28361 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4889 stars left (next iteration limit 5376)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=9.949 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.357 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=0.370 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.400 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=0.282 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.288 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4889 robust_rms_before=1.055 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.263 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.282 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.275 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.288
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.275 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits N_match=4889 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=1238 n_q2=1248 n_q3=1177 n_q4=1226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.062
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-29-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_043104_TTUQ1b1x1_473135_Ge6k635F/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:36:43.20 -00:26:10.4: 14.45 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:24:01.39 -01:18:09.1: 14.69 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:40:36.24 +00:12:21.0: 14.68 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:28:30.75 -04:35:31.3: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:05:56.69 +02:14:46.6: 14.07 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:28:27.26 +00:04:49.7: 13.85 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:29:34.55 -05:21:34.2: 13.64 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:28:27.26 +00:04:49.7: 13.93 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:28:30.75 -04:35:31.3: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:05:56.69 +02:14:46.6: 14.10 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:36:43.20 -00:26:10.4: 14.46 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:27.26 +00:04:49.7: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9980 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:40:36.24 +00:12:21.0: 14.51 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:24:01.39 -01:18:09.1: 14.61 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:29:34.55 -05:21:34.2: 13.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:05:56.69 +02:14:46.6: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3683 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:30.75 -04:35:31.3: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6391 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:43.20 -00:26:10.4: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3288 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:40:36.24 +00:12:21.0: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4538 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:01.39 -01:18:09.1: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4399 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:34.55 -05:21:34.2: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6484 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:40:03.03 +02:51:52.8: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:45:11.91 +02:18:05.7: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:38:24.50 +01:55:17.3: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:19:48.36 +00:55:34.4: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:40:03.03 +02:51:52.8: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:40:03.03 +02:51:52.8: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2933 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:07:58.37 +00:05:10.6: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:45:11.91 +02:18:05.7: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:45:11.91 +02:18:05.7: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5319 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:38:24.50 +01:55:17.3: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:38:24.50 +01:55:17.3: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5952 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:19:48.36 +00:55:34.4: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:07:58.37 +00:05:10.6: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:47:43.96 +02:02:26.6: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:47:43.96 +02:02:26.6: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:47:43.96 +02:02:26.6: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2598 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:14:30.55 -07:10:02.4: 14.04 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:50:15.87 +01:49:06.4: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:50:41.22 +01:17:00.5: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:14:30.55 -07:10:02.4: 14.07 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:14:30.55 -07:10:02.4: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5840 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:46:22.37 +02:11:44.3: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:56:27.60 -00:35:54.0: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:59:42.25 -01:20:07.0: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:50:15.87 +01:49:06.4: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:50:41.22 +01:17:00.5: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:50:15.87 +01:49:06.4: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6655 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:46:22.37 +02:11:44.3: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:56:27.60 -00:35:54.0: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:27.60 -00:35:54.0: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6411 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:59:42.25 -01:20:07.0: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:32:06.31 +00:02:55.5: 13.63 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:32:06.31 +00:02:55.5: 13.70 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:06.31 +00:02:55.5: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8988 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:27:19.99 -04:53:28.6: 14.51 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:48:43.28 +02:54:32.2: 14.16 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:29:29.28 -00:58:09.6: 13.86 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:27:19.99 -04:53:28.6: 14.42 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:19.99 -04:53:28.6: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0765 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:26:59.13 -06:47:20.4: 14.35 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:48:43.28 +02:54:32.2: 14.04 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:48:43.28 +02:54:32.2: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0238 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:29:29.28 -00:58:09.6: 13.95 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:29.28 -00:58:09.6: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9382 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:26:59.13 -06:47:20.4: 14.50 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:59.13 -06:47:20.4: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0835 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:56:37.18 -00:30:14.6: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:56:37.18 -00:30:14.6: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:29:42.64 -06:02:29.7: 14.40 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:29:42.64 -06:02:29.7: 14.51 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:42.64 -06:02:29.7: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0167 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:26:20.70 -04:41:06.8: 14.64 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:32:28.09 +00:59:07.0: 13.99 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:26:20.70 -04:41:06.8: 14.51 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:32:28.09 +00:59:07.0: 14.04 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:20.70 -04:41:06.8: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2623 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:28.09 +00:59:07.0: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1052 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:26:15.69 -06:43:38.2: 15.04 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:29:13.34 -03:27:54.1: 14.86 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:25:34.01 -05:59:44.0: 14.44 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:27:38.43 -06:26:42.9: 14.40 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:26:15.69 -06:43:38.2: 14.39 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:29:13.34 -03:27:54.1: 14.71 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:15.69 -06:43:38.2: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3047 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:13.34 -03:27:54.1: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4046 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:25:34.01 -05:59:44.0: 14.55 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:27:38.43 -06:26:42.9: 14.62 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:34.01 -05:59:44.0: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1399 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:38.43 -06:26:42.9: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1804 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:29:47.11 -04:41:53.3: 14.71 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:29:47.11 -04:41:53.3: 14.68 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:47.11 -04:41:53.3: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4702 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:56:04.83 -05:25:21.0: 14.24 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:28:07.57 -05:59:08.8: 14.68 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:24:26.33 -06:28:01.4: 14.78 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:56:04.83 -05:25:21.0: 14.27 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:04.83 -05:25:21.0: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2766 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:28:07.57 -05:59:08.8: 14.67 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:07.57 -05:59:08.8: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3876 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:24:26.33 -06:28:01.4: 14.99 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:26.33 -06:28:01.4: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4132 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:35:30.06 +02:31:43.4: 15.16 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:29:29.85 -02:37:31.8: 14.97 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:35:30.06 +02:31:43.4: 14.64 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:30.06 +02:31:43.4: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4564 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:29:29.85 -02:37:31.8: 14.96 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:29.85 -02:37:31.8: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5065 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:28:53.63 -04:46:58.0: 14.71 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:28:53.63 -04:46:58.0: 14.74 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:53.63 -04:46:58.0: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4573 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:27:48.86 -06:31:34.2: 14.79 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:28:47.28 -03:40:24.4: 14.89 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:27:48.86 -06:31:34.2: 14.81 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:48.86 -06:31:34.2: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4950 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:55:27.92 +01:40:46.3: 14.41 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:28:47.28 -03:40:24.4: 14.69 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:47.28 -03:40:24.4: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4564 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:55:27.92 +01:40:46.3: 14.48 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:27.92 +01:40:46.3: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4344 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:28:45.19 -05:58:43.6: 14.72 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:28:45.19 -05:58:43.6: 14.93 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:45.19 -05:58:43.6: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4556 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:30:27.72 -00:09:34.4: 14.97 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:30:27.72 -00:09:34.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:27.72 -00:09:34.4: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.6323 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:33:15.67 +01:55:15.6: 14.91 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:36:12.89 +03:03:42.3: 14.63 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:51:23.88 +02:25:17.9: 14.30 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:33:15.67 +01:55:15.6: 14.78 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:36:12.89 +03:03:42.3: 14.81 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:15.67 +01:55:15.6: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5453 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:12.89 +03:03:42.3: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5299 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:30:12.06 +01:52:03.7: 14.68 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:51:23.88 +02:25:17.9: 14.18 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:51:23.88 +02:25:17.9: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5145 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:59:21.86 +02:28:43.2: 14.31 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:30:12.06 +01:52:03.7: 14.63 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:12.06 +01:52:03.7: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3932 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:26:34.15 -04:40:49.2: 14.73 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:27:06.23 -07:06:23.5: 14.57 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:23:49.89 -03:03:52.6: 14.58 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:36:20.68 -03:27:52.0: 14.68 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:59:21.86 +02:28:43.2: 14.34 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:59:21.86 +02:28:43.2: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4105 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:26:34.15 -04:40:49.2: 14.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:34.15 -04:40:49.2: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5624 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:30:27.56 -02:01:44.5: 14.84 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:27:06.23 -07:06:23.5: 14.78 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:23:49.89 -03:03:52.6: 14.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:06.23 -07:06:23.5: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3606 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:49.89 -03:03:52.6: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5267 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:34:29.59 +01:31:23.9: 14.69 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:36:20.68 -03:27:52.0: 14.70 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:20.68 -03:27:52.0: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4696 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:30:27.56 -02:01:44.5: 14.82 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:27.56 -02:01:44.5: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6599 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:30:45.86 +01:05:03.3: 14.87 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:34:29.59 +01:31:23.9: 14.95 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:29.59 +01:31:23.9: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5570 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:26:41.91 -05:11:48.8: 15.15 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:26:26.33 -01:09:37.1: 14.70 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:46:39.18 -03:07:53.3: 14.30 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:30:45.86 +01:05:03.3: 15.24 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:45.86 +01:05:03.3: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.5722 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:52:10.68 +02:50:00.3: 15.01 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:33:15.33 +00:37:46.8: 14.78 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:26:41.91 -05:11:48.8: 15.05 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:41.91 -05:11:48.8: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5376 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:26:26.33 -01:09:37.1: 14.86 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:26.33 -01:09:37.1: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5777 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:46:39.18 -03:07:53.3: 14.41 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:46:39.18 -03:07:53.3: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4823 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:52:10.68 +02:50:00.3: 14.76 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:52:10.68 +02:50:00.3: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6612 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:33:15.33 +00:37:46.8: 15.14 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:15.33 +00:37:46.8: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4632 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:37:55.52 +02:11:38.5: 14.78 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:29:31.12 -01:09:46.4: 14.49 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:32:46.45 +02:43:51.6: 14.71 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:23:05.32 -05:47:24.9: 14.74 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:37:55.52 +02:11:38.5: 14.82 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:55.52 +02:11:38.5: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4708 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:30:46.46 +01:23:50.2: 15.21 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:29:31.12 -01:09:46.4: 14.29 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:31.12 -01:09:46.4: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5001 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:41:12.58 +02:38:47.0: 14.99 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:35:10.48 -01:47:01.4: 14.84 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:30:17.43 +01:28:23.5: 14.71 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:32:46.45 +02:43:51.6: 15.07 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:46.45 +02:43:51.6: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6098 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:23:05.32 -05:47:24.9: 14.67 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:05.32 -05:47:24.9: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5268 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:31:22.56 +02:32:43.8: 14.77 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:30:46.46 +01:23:50.2: 14.76 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:46.46 +01:23:50.2: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5832 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:41:12.58 +02:38:47.0: 15.00 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:41:12.58 +02:38:47.0: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6879 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:35:10.48 -01:47:01.4: 15.08 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:30:17.43 +01:28:23.5: 14.75 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:10.48 -01:47:01.4: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6413 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:17.43 +01:28:23.5: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6183 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:01:38.16 +03:03:24.1: 15.07 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:31:21.19 -00:09:20.3: 15.11 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:31:22.56 +02:32:43.8: 14.46 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:22.56 +02:32:43.8: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4933 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:52:50.34 +02:59:49.9: 14.72 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:01:38.16 +03:03:24.1: 15.01 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:01:38.16 +03:03:24.1: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7721 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:25:23.25 -03:50:11.1: 14.98 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:31:22.04 -05:27:08.9: 14.73 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:31:21.19 -00:09:20.3: 15.17 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:21.19 -00:09:20.3: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.5259 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:52:50.34 +02:59:49.9: 14.83 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:52:50.34 +02:59:49.9: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6068 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:37:45.18 -03:19:15.3: 14.87 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:14:08.05 -06:20:02.2: 15.01 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:30:47.81 +03:03:58.0: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:43:38.98 +02:42:52.6: 14.71 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:25:23.25 -03:50:11.1: 14.94 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:31:22.04 -05:27:08.9: 14.92 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:23.25 -03:50:11.1: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5312 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:22.04 -05:27:08.9: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5172 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:37:45.18 -03:19:15.3: 14.76 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:45.18 -03:19:15.3: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5782 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:30:47.81 +03:03:58.0: 14.88 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:43:38.98 +02:42:52.6: 14.96 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:14:08.05 -06:20:02.2: 15.30 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.23
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:47.81 +03:03:58.0: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.23 new_mean_mag=14.6329 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:14:08.05 -06:20:02.2: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6732 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:43:38.98 +02:42:52.6: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6606 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:34:50.48 +00:02:19.1: 15.11 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:34:50.48 +00:02:19.1: 14.99 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:50.48 +00:02:19.1: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6966 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33104.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33187.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33463.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33474.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33502.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33659.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 44s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32785_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 32785_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32788_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 32788_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32790_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 32790_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32791_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 32791_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32794_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 32794_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32796_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 32796_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32797_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 32797_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32798_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 32798_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32804_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
Preparing report for the candidate 32804_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32882_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 32882_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32931_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 32931_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:34:47.88 +02:57:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32932_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 32932_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32950_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 32950_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32974_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 32974_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:14:54.02 -05:20:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32988_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 32988_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33009_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33009_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33018_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33018_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33067_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33067_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33079_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33079_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33104_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
Preparing report for the candidate 33104_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33113_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33113_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:54:52.12 +00:04:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33129_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33129_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33132_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33132_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33136_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33136_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33144_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33144_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33159_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33159_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33171_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33171_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33187_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
Preparing report for the candidate 33187_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33199_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33199_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33214_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33214_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33241_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33241_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33251_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33251_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33265_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33265_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33268_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33268_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33270_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33270_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33271_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33271_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33276_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33276_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33283_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33283_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33287_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33287_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33289_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33289_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33295_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33295_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33303_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33303_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33308_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33308_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33337_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33337_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33338_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33338_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33353_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33353_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33363_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33363_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33370_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33370_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33374_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33374_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33377_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33377_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33380_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33380_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33399_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33399_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33400_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33400_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33401_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33401_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33410_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33410_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33414_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33414_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33415_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33415_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33419_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33419_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33425_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33425_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33434_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33434_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33435_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33435_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33436_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33436_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33447_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33447_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33449_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33449_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33455_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33455_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33456_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33456_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33463_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
Preparing report for the candidate 33463_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33466_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33466_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:17:51.83 +00:22:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33472_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33472_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33473_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33473_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33474_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
Preparing report for the candidate 33474_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33475_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33475_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33502_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
Preparing report for the candidate 33502_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33507_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33507_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33510_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33510_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33514_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33514_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33524_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33524_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33539_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33539_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33556_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33556_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33558_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33558_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33566_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33566_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33569_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33569_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33571_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33571_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33576_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33576_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33579_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33579_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33583_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33583_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33592_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33592_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33601_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33601_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33609_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33609_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33611_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33611_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33617_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33617_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33618_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33618_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33623_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33623_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33624_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33624_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33628_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33628_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33632_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33632_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33635_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33635_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33639_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33639_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33641_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33641_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33647_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33647_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33652_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33652_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33659_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
Preparing report for the candidate 33659_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33664_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33664_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33666_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33666_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33671_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33671_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33677_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33677_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33681_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33681_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33684_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33684_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33691_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33691_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33695_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33695_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33699_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33699_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33703_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33703_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33708_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33708_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33711_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33711_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33718_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33718_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33725_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33725_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33732_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33732_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33733_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33733_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33739_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33739_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33741_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33741_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33745_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33745_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33748_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33748_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33751_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33751_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33761_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33761_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33765_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33765_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33766_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33766_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33769_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33769_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33772_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33772_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33777_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33777_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33783_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33783_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33787_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33787_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33789_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33789_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33790_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33790_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33800_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33800_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33801_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33801_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33802_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33802_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33805_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33805_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33809_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33809_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33811_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33811_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33814_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33814_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33831_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33831_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33832_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33832_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33833_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33833_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33834_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33834_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33842_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33842_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33843_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33843_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33850_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33850_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33852_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33852_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33864_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33864_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33865_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33865_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33867_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33867_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33870_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33870_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33871_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33871_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33876_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33876_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33884_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33884_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33886_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33886_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33889_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33889_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33893_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33893_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33900_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33900_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33902_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33902_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33904_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33904_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33909_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33909_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33923_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33923_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33924_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33924_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33927_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33927_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33933_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33933_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33935_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33935_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33944_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33944_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33946_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33946_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:42:02.76 -04:31:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33950_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33950_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33953_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33953_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33961_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33961_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33966_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33966_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33969_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33969_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33970_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33970_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33971_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33971_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33974_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33974_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33982_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33982_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33985_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33985_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33986_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33986_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33987_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33987_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33988_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33988_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33989_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33989_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33990_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33990_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33991_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33991_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33993_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33993_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33994_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33994_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33999_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 33999_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34001_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34001_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34002_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34002_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34004_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34004_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34007_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34007_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34012_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34012_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34014_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34014_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34015_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34015_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34017_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34017_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34018_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34018_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34025_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34025_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34026_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34026_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34028_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34028_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34033_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34033_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34034_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34034_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34037_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34037_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34038_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34038_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34039_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34039_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34045_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34045_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34047_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34047_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34056_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34056_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34058_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34058_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34067_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34067_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34072_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34072_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34073_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34073_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34075_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34075_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34076_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34076_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34081_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34081_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34082_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34082_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34087_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34087_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34089_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34089_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34090_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34090_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34093_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34093_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34103_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34103_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34109_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34109_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34111_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34111_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34112_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34112_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34117_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34117_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34121_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34121_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34132_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34132_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34147_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34147_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34151_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 34151_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26990_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 26990_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-30-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
