This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.3598 2461269.8598 12.67 00:29:32.30 +16:46:59.8
115.40744 -45.76827 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 4.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.165 Loreley -1 0 1 12.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits at 00:29:32.30 +16:46:59.8: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits at 00:29:32.30 +16:46:59.8: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.8598,12.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.3598 12.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.3598 2461269.8598 13.80 00:48:47.65 +16:41:36.1
122.01766 -46.17369 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.392 Wilhelmina 0 0 0 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits at 00:48:47.65 +16:41:36.1: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits at 00:48:47.65 +16:41:36.1: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.8598,13.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.3598 13.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.3598 2461269.8598 13.71 00:51:54.83 +12:10:32.4
123.11552 -50.69591 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.524 Fidelio -1 0 1 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits at 00:51:54.83 +12:10:32.4: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits at 00:51:54.83 +12:10:32.4: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.8598,13.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.3598 13.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.3598 2461269.8598 14.28 00:26:26.95 +12:21:27.8
113.40304 -50.05112 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.701 Oriola -0 -0 1 14.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits at 00:26:26.95 +12:21:27.8: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits at 00:26:26.95 +12:21:27.8: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.8598,14.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.3598 14.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461243.89018230 22.07.2026 09:21:41.751 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
First image: 2461243.89018230 22.07.2026 09:21:41.751 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
Last image: 2461269.86013251 17.08.2026 08:38:25.449 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5294
Objects passed selection criteria: 5292
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5109.5
Average stars matched: 4896.75 (95.8362 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232488 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 17 04:01:50 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461243.89018230 22.07.2026 09:21:41.751 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
First image: 2461243.89018230 22.07.2026 09:21:41.751 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
Last image: 2461269.86013251 17.08.2026 08:38:25.449 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 192
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.29
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 11 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 28947
Objects passed selection criteria: 28872
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 28037.2
Average stars matched: 26827.2 (95.6843 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 254036 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 17 04:02:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461269.85949115
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:53:20.923 +13:59:58.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:53:20.228 +14:00:51.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:53:20.923 +13:59:58.60
Second-epoch image center 00:53:20.228 +14:00:51.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0149 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:53:19.757 +14:00:22.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:53:20.923 +13:59:58.60
Second-epoch image center 00:53:19.757 +14:00:22.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0081 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:53:20.228 +14:00:51.45
Second-epoch second image center 00:53:19.757 +14:00:22.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00827 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5EDwAgbdwG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rrCFvWwY8v
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits &> /tmp/tmp.E7Rk415RRz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gMDLpvP17S
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits and wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits and wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits and wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6294 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.0190 to 21.5394 deg, Dec +8.6191 to +19.2626 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.0190 to 21.5394 deg, Dec 8.6191 to 19.2626 deg
Loaded 4654 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3742 out of 3855 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3855 out of 6294 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.599200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.599200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.05
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.05
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6294 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.0190 to 21.5394 deg, Dec +8.6191 to +19.2626 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.0190 to 21.5394 deg, Dec 8.6191 to 19.2626 deg
Loaded 4654 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3742 out of 3855 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3855 out of 6294 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 6293 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.0188 to 21.5394 deg, Dec +8.6193 to +19.2626 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.0188 to 21.5394 deg, Dec 8.6193 to 19.2626 deg
Loaded 4654 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3741 out of 3855 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3855 out of 6293 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
2.3 pix Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
2.3 pix fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
2.3 pix fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
15.0 mag. Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.5EDwAgbdwG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=369, bad_region=1423, passed=6294
Got 6294 stars (including 4587 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6294 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4483 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4480 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4480 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5147 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4484 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4481 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5147 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4481 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5147 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4481 stars left (next iteration limit 4928)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits N_match=4481 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.367 n_q1=1314 n_q2=772 n_q3=1516 n_q4=879 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.047
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits -region wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rrCFvWwY8v (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=366, bad_region=1434, passed=6293
Got 6293 stars (including 4582 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6293 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4478 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4473 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4473 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5138 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4479 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4474 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5138 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4474 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5138 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4474 stars left (next iteration limit 4920)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits N_match=4474 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.350 n_q1=1314 n_q2=772 n_q3=1515 n_q4=873 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.111
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits -region wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.E7Rk415RRz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=375, bad_region=1529, passed=6937
Got 6937 stars (including 5120 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6937 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5719 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5719 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5719 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4876 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=6.938 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.002 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.374 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.430 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.317 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.341 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4876 robust_rms_before=0.966 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.304 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.317 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.314 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.341
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.314 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits N_match=4876 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.331 n_q1=1480 n_q2=835 n_q3=1600 n_q4=961 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.031
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gMDLpvP17S (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=378, bad_region=1555, passed=6957
Got 6957 stars (including 5115 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6957 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=6.962 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.053 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.391 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.459 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.317 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.329 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4880 robust_rms_before=0.960 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.305 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.317 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.319 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.329
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.319 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.343 n_q1=1466 n_q2=826 n_q3=1620 n_q4=968 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.058
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits sigma_overall=0.353 worst_q_ratio=1.047
ref2=Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits sigma_overall=0.352 worst_q_ratio=1.111
new1=fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits sigma_overall=0.321 worst_q_ratio=1.031
new2=fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits sigma_overall=0.324 worst_q_ratio=1.058
reference average sigma_overall=0.3525 worst_q_ratio=1.079
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418_astrometric_residuals.png (4481 matched stars from wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419_astrometric_residuals.png (4474 matched stars from wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398_astrometric_residuals.png (4876 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399_astrometric_residuals.png (4880 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Psc-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:53:20.923 +13:59:58.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:53:20.228 +14:00:51.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:53:20.923 +13:59:58.60
Second-epoch image center 00:53:20.228 +14:00:51.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0149 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:53:19.757 +14:00:22.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:53:20.923 +13:59:58.60
Second-epoch image center 00:53:19.757 +14:00:22.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0081 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:53:20.228 +14:00:51.45
Second-epoch second image center 00:53:19.757 +14:00:22.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00827 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hazXXg75R5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9BNxfKRG2z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AdQOjAdFHy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vALOf1vdBP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits and wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits and wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits and wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 33385 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.0190 to 21.5394 deg, Dec +8.6084 to +19.2703 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.0190 to 21.5394 deg, Dec 8.6084 to 19.2703 deg
Loaded 4659 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3709 out of 3992 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3992 out of 33385 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.480700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.480700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.29
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.19
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.19
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 33385 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.0190 to 21.5394 deg, Dec +8.6084 to +19.2703 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.0190 to 21.5394 deg, Dec 8.6084 to 19.2703 deg
Loaded 4659 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3709 out of 3992 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3992 out of 33385 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 33431 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.0188 to 21.5394 deg, Dec +8.6161 to +19.2770 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.0188 to 21.5394 deg, Dec 8.6161 to 19.2770 deg
Loaded 4660 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3696 out of 3986 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3986 out of 33431 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 105 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
2.2 pix Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
2.2 pix fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
2.2 pix fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
15.2 mag. Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.hazXXg75R5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1347, bad_region=5852, passed=33367
Got 33367 stars (including 26499 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33367 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.357 n_q1=1487 n_q2=797 n_q3=1612 n_q4=985 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.059
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits -region wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9BNxfKRG2z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1381, bad_region=5894, passed=33417
Got 33417 stars (including 26470 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33417 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4877 stars left (next iteration limit 5364)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits N_match=4877 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.338 n_q1=1472 n_q2=805 n_q3=1621 n_q4=979 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits -region wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AdQOjAdFHy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1494, bad_region=6034, passed=34818
Got 34818 stars (including 27695 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34818 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4874 stars left (next iteration limit 5361)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=6.614 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.287 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.376 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.432 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.315 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.330 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4874 robust_rms_before=0.954 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.303 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.315 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.314 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.330
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.314 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits N_match=4874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.332 n_q1=1487 n_q2=799 n_q3=1609 n_q4=979 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.047
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vALOf1vdBP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1565, bad_region=6107, passed=35068
Got 35068 stars (including 27832 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35068 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=6.618 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.302 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.389 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.464 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.315 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.326 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4875 robust_rms_before=0.947 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.305 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.315 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.314 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.326
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.314 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1480 n_q2=791 n_q3=1621 n_q4=983 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.046
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-37-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0398.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_035827_TTUQ2b1x1_3306079_YsVyLlKC/wcs_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits at 00:48:08.98 +15:29:45.5: 14.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits at 00:27:49.61 +18:01:59.5: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits at 00:57:45.54 +10:02:25.3: 14.04 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits at 00:29:32.30 +16:46:59.8: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits at 00:38:16.63 +15:25:54.1: 14.10 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits at 00:27:20.20 +14:44:12.6: 14.66 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits at 00:27:49.61 +18:01:59.5: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits at 00:29:32.30 +16:46:59.8: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits at 00:48:08.98 +15:29:45.5: 13.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits at 00:57:45.54 +10:02:25.3: 13.89 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits at 00:38:16.63 +15:25:54.1: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits at 00:27:20.20 +14:44:12.6: 14.51 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:49.61 +18:01:59.5: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6339 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:48:08.98 +15:29:45.5: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3731 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:57:45.54 +10:02:25.3: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1565 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:20.20 +14:44:12.6: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5064 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:38:16.63 +15:25:54.1: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4049 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits at 00:31:09.65 +17:45:23.8: 13.70 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits at 00:48:47.65 +16:41:36.1: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits at 00:51:54.83 +12:10:32.4: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits at 00:31:09.65 +17:45:23.8: 13.70 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:09.65 +17:45:23.8: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6445 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits at 00:48:47.65 +16:41:36.1: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits at 00:51:54.83 +12:10:32.4: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits at 00:40:19.50 +17:41:44.3: 14.32 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits at 00:26:26.95 +12:21:27.8: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits at 00:40:19.50 +17:41:44.3: 14.23 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:40:19.50 +17:41:44.3: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2227 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits at 00:26:26.95 +12:21:27.8: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits at 01:01:18.71 +11:53:22.6: 14.69 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits at 00:35:54.43 +17:49:00.1: 14.47 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits at 01:01:18.71 +11:53:22.6: 14.72 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:01:18.71 +11:53:22.6: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4973 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits at 00:35:54.43 +17:49:00.1: 14.19 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits at 00:51:18.27 +17:55:37.7: 14.39 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:35:54.43 +17:49:00.1: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3759 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits at 01:11:02.95 +17:39:43.5: 14.97 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits at 01:10:34.42 +10:08:22.5: 14.80 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits at 00:30:08.81 +13:16:49.1: 14.71 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits at 00:51:18.27 +17:55:37.7: 14.67 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:51:18.27 +17:55:37.7: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5407 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits at 01:07:14.26 +13:57:18.6: 14.72 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits at 01:11:02.95 +17:39:43.5: 14.95 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:11:02.95 +17:39:43.5: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6354 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits at 01:10:34.42 +10:08:22.5: 14.88 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:10:34.42 +10:08:22.5: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6831 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits at 00:27:28.26 +16:47:31.6: 15.21 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits at 00:30:08.81 +13:16:49.1: 14.92 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:08.81 +13:16:49.1: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7092 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits at 01:07:14.26 +13:57:18.6: 14.68 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:07:14.26 +13:57:18.6: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5149 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits at 00:27:28.26 +16:47:31.6: 14.92 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:28.26 +16:47:31.6: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7314 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits at 00:40:39.56 +16:40:02.3: 14.87 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits at 01:09:18.63 +09:59:16.1: 14.74 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits at 00:31:43.78 +13:45:57.7: 14.78 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits at 00:26:23.45 +09:53:05.4: 14.67 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits at 01:09:18.63 +09:59:16.1: 15.39 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits at 00:40:39.56 +16:40:02.3: 14.56 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:09:18.63 +09:59:16.1: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6586 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:40:39.56 +16:40:02.3: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6919 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits at 00:31:43.78 +13:45:57.7: 15.23 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:43.78 +13:45:57.7: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6991 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits at 00:26:23.45 +09:53:05.4: 14.92 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:23.45 +09:53:05.4: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6891 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits at 00:31:37.61 +14:17:53.5: 15.14 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits at 00:24:56.68 +16:16:58.2: 14.88 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits at 00:31:37.61 +14:17:53.5: 15.17 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:37.61 +14:17:53.5: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6410 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits at 00:26:54.03 +14:17:36.2: 14.88 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits at 00:29:29.35 +12:37:56.2: 14.89 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits at 00:31:12.68 +14:41:47.7: 14.67 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits at 00:25:00.47 +14:34:52.3: 14.69 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits at 00:24:56.68 +16:16:58.2: 14.87 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:56.68 +16:16:58.2: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5198 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits at 00:29:29.35 +12:37:56.2: 15.02 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits at 00:26:54.03 +14:17:36.2: 15.33 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:29.35 +12:37:56.2: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8184 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:54.03 +14:17:36.2: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7354 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits at 00:31:12.68 +14:41:47.7: 14.57 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:12.68 +14:41:47.7: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6112 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits at 00:25:00.47 +14:34:52.3: 14.79 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:00.47 +14:34:52.3: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7625 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-21-41_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits at 00:56:03.07 +12:22:05.6: 14.68 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-07-22_04-22-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits at 00:56:03.07 +12:22:05.6: 14.90 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:56:03.07 +12:22:05.6: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7533 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51906.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51988.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52001.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52069.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51874_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 51874_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51876_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 51876_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51877_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 51877_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51878_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 51878_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51887_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 51887_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51891_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 51891_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51895_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 51895_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51899_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 51899_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51903_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 51903_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51906_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 51906_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51907_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 51907_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51923_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 51923_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51925_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 51925_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51934_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 51934_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51935_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 51935_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51940_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 51940_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51950_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 51950_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51951_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 51951_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51952_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 51952_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51953_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 51953_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51959_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 51959_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51961_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 51961_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51969_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 51969_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51972_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 51972_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51974_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 51974_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51975_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 51975_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51977_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 51977_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51978_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 51978_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51982_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 51982_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51984_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 51984_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51985_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 51985_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51986_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 51986_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51987_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 51987_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51988_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 51988_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51991_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 51991_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51993_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 51993_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51994_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 51994_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52000_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52000_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52001_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 52001_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52003_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52003_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52007_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52007_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52015_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52015_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52021_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52021_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52023_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52023_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52025_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52025_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52028_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52028_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52032_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52032_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52038_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52038_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52039_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52039_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52044_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52044_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52045_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52045_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52049_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52049_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52051_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52051_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52053_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52053_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52057_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52057_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52058_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52058_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52060_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52060_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52061_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52061_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52062_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52062_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52069_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 52069_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52070_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52070_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52073_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52073_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52074_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52074_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52078_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52078_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52081_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52081_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52084_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52084_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52087_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52087_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52088_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52088_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52090_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52090_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52091_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52091_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52094_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52094_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52099_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52099_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52103_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52103_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52108_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52108_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52110_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52110_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52117_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52117_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52119_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52119_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52130_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52130_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52132_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52132_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52133_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52133_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52136_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52136_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52145_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52145_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52147_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52147_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52152_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52152_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52154_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52154_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52156_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52156_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52157_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52157_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52158_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52158_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52160_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52160_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52163_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52163_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52168_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52168_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52170_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52170_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52175_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52175_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52178_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52178_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52182_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52182_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52186_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52186_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52188_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52188_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52190_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52190_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52197_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52197_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52200_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52200_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52205_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52205_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52208_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52208_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52209_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52209_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52215_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52215_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52224_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399
The candidate 52224_fd_Psc-02-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-38-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0399 did not pass the final checks