This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.3169 2461269.8169 12.01 07:36:36.22 +57:31:53.6
159.76201 28.57157 galactic Lyn Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 2.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 07:36:36.22 +57:31:53.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.768+/-0.033 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 07:36:36.22 +57:31:53.6: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:36:36.22 +57:31:53.6: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461269.8169,12.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260817.3169 12.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.3169 2461269.8169 12.14 07:46:09.44 +58:48:21.8
158.43433 29.93862 galactic Lyn Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 2.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 07:46:09.44 +58:48:21.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: F2 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.339+/-0.028 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 07:46:09.44 +58:48:21.8: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:46:09.44 +58:48:21.8: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461269.8169,12.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260817.3169 12.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.3169 2461269.8169 12.73 06:32:39.95 +63:15:45.1
151.85142 21.99147 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 2.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 06:32:39.95 +63:15:45.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.672+/-0.028 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 06:32:39.95 +63:15:45.1: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:32:39.95 +63:15:45.1: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461269.8169,12.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260817.3169 12.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.3169 2461269.8169 12.62 06:26:46.36 +62:30:54.4
152.39752 21.12465 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 2.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 06:26:46.36 +62:30:54.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.730+/-0.032 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 06:26:46.36 +62:30:54.4: 13.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:26:46.36 +62:30:54.4: 13.59 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461269.8169,12.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260817.3169 12.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.3169 2461269.8169 12.69 06:14:39.54 +61:18:39.1
153.08653 19.37419 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 3.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" NSVS 2247440
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.664 r Y 1.092 r 2451443.27000 237.873027500000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 06:14:39.54 +61:18:39.1: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:14:39.54 +61:18:39.1: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 2247440,2461269.8169,12.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 2247440 20260817.3169 12.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.3169 2461269.8169 12.00 07:42:09.68 +59:16:57.7
157.84574 29.45923 galactic Lyn Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.2" and 3.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 07:42:09.68 +59:16:57.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 07:42:09.68 +59:16:57.7: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:42:09.68 +59:16:57.7: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461269.8169,12.00,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260817.3169 12.00CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.3169 2461269.8169 11.80 07:41:59.13 +57:57:19.5
159.36195 29.32836 galactic Lyn Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 2.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J115.4964+57.9554 | 07:41:59.13 +57:57:19.5 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.461+/-0.030 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 07:41:59.13 +57:57:19.5: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:41:59.13 +57:57:19.5: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J115.4964+57.9554,2461269.8169,11.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J115.4964+57.9554 20260817.3169 11.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.3169 2461269.8169 11.70 07:46:25.32 +58:37:01.8
158.65445 29.96059 galactic Lyn Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 2.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J116.6080+58.6158 | 07:46:25.32 +58:37:01.8 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.633+/-0.032 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 07:46:25.32 +58:37:01.8: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:46:25.32 +58:37:01.8: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J116.6080+58.6158,2461269.8169,11.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J116.6080+58.6158 20260817.3169 11.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.3169 2461269.8169 11.61 07:40:15.50 +58:46:46.7
158.39821 29.17471 galactic Lyn Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 1085561573999085056 | 07:40:15.50 +58:46:47.0 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: K4 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.942+/-0.032 (M)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 07:40:15.50 +58:46:46.7: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:40:15.50 +58:46:46.7: 12.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1085561573999085056,2461269.8169,11.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1085561573999085056 20260817.3169 11.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.3169 2461269.8169 11.51 07:30:59.70 +57:47:06.7
159.37412 27.85733 galactic Lyn Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 2.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 989560464998419072 | 07:30:59.86 +57:47:05.8 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=0.587+/-0.034 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 07:30:59.70 +57:47:06.7: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:30:59.70 +57:47:06.7: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 989560464998419072,2461269.8169,11.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 989560464998419072 20260817.3169 11.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.3169 2461269.8169 11.27 07:39:48.19 +58:05:43.9
159.17187 29.05346 galactic Lyn Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 2.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J114.9510+58.0956 | 07:39:48.24 +58:05:44.5 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=1.072+/-0.034 (M)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 07:39:48.19 +58:05:43.9: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:39:48.19 +58:05:43.9: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J114.9510+58.0956,2461269.8169,11.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J114.9510+58.0956 20260817.3169 11.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.80202095 18.01.2026 07:14:44.610 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
First image: 2461058.80202095 18.01.2026 07:14:44.610 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Last image: 2461269.81715142 17.08.2026 07:36:31.883 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.49
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 14384
Objects passed selection criteria: 14301
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9385
Average stars matched: 9231.75 (98.3671 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 240052 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 17 02:42:07 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.80202095 18.01.2026 07:14:44.610 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
First image: 2461058.80202095 18.01.2026 07:14:44.610 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Last image: 2461269.81715142 17.08.2026 07:36:31.883 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 159
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 29 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 89204
Objects passed selection criteria: 88941
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 60627.5
Average stars matched: 58566 (96.5997 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 544852 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 17 02:43:32 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461269.81665763
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:28.018 +61:59:55.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits
Image size: 944.0'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:25.790 +62:00:02.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:28.018 +61:59:55.30
Second-epoch image center 06:51:25.790 +62:00:02.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0048 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
Image size: 944.0'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:25.340 +62:00:17.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:28.018 +61:59:55.30
Second-epoch image center 06:51:25.340 +62:00:17.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0081 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:51:25.790 +62:00:02.20
Second-epoch second image center 06:51:25.340 +62:00:17.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00433 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7AchYHPiRS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZuGCRugh3r
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cbI4FjZxaS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bcbeT5R1xM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 15810 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 84.1358 to 122.8237 deg, Dec +55.3686 to +67.4013 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 84.1358 to 122.8237 deg, Dec 55.3686 to 67.4013 deg
Loaded 12996 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7848 out of 8376 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8376 out of 15810 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.884600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.884600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.49
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 15810 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 84.1358 to 122.8237 deg, Dec +55.3686 to +67.4013 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 84.1358 to 122.8237 deg, Dec 55.3686 to 67.4013 deg
Loaded 12996 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7848 out of 8376 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8376 out of 15810 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 14938 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 84.1354 to 122.8239 deg, Dec +55.3686 to +67.4013 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 84.1354 to 122.8239 deg, Dec 55.3686 to 67.4013 deg
Loaded 12998 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7736 out of 8302 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8302 out of 14938 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
2.2 pix Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
15.4 mag. Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
12.9 mag. fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits
12.9 mag. fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.9 (SNR ) 10.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.7AchYHPiRS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1179, bad_region=0, passed=15810
Got 15810 stars (including 14612 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15810 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15810 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15810 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15810 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5396)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.245 n_q1=1047 n_q2=1295 n_q3=1145 n_q4=1419 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits -region wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZuGCRugh3r (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1174, bad_region=0, passed=14938
Got 14938 stars (including 13741 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14938 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5393)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=1043 n_q2=1311 n_q3=1133 n_q4=1417 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.374
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits -region wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cbI4FjZxaS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=132, bad_region=0, passed=3484
Got 3484 stars (including 3345 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3484 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013111 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010489 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 730 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3265 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3251 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3251 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 730 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3261 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3253 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3253 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 3253 stars left (next iteration limit 3576)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3253 robust_rms=8.515 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.229 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3253 robust_rms=0.640 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.888 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3253 robust_rms=0.503 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.798 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3253 robust_rms_before=1.299 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.417 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.503 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.552 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.798
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.552 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits N_match=3253 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.433 n_q1=994 n_q2=646 n_q3=1089 n_q4=524 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.329
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bcbeT5R1xM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=174, bad_region=0, passed=3544
Got 3544 stars (including 3366 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3544 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013111 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010489 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3288 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3274 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3274 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3274 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3284 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3276 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3276 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 3276 stars left (next iteration limit 3601)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3276 robust_rms=8.292 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=18.299 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3276 robust_rms=0.566 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.165 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3276 robust_rms=0.487 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.705 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3276 robust_rms_before=1.202 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.422 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.487 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.582 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.705
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.582 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits N_match=3276 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.599 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.445 n_q1=1017 n_q2=648 n_q3=1077 n_q4=534 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.389
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits sigma_overall=0.273 worst_q_ratio=1.258
ref2=Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.374
new1=fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits sigma_overall=0.420 worst_q_ratio=1.329
new2=fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits sigma_overall=0.431 worst_q_ratio=1.389
reference average sigma_overall=0.32 worst_q_ratio=1.316
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302_astrometric_residuals.png (4906 matched stars from wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256_astrometric_residuals.png (4904 matched stars from wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314_astrometric_residuals.png (3253 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315_astrometric_residuals.png (3276 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20532_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 20532_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:47.10 +58:14:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20542_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 20542_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:33.54 +60:56:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:28.018 +61:59:55.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits
Image size: 944.0'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:25.790 +62:00:02.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:28.018 +61:59:55.30
Second-epoch image center 06:51:25.790 +62:00:02.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0048 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
Image size: 944.0'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:25.340 +62:00:17.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:28.018 +61:59:55.30
Second-epoch image center 06:51:25.340 +62:00:17.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0081 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:51:25.790 +62:00:02.20
Second-epoch second image center 06:51:25.340 +62:00:17.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00433 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xusQ6XAFF4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5YqesL1Ee7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3ZBERQ7mEw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vgW4Rtemsu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 97279 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 84.1358 to 122.8237 deg, Dec +55.3686 to +67.4100 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 84.1358 to 122.8237 deg, Dec 55.3686 to 67.4100 deg
Loaded 13005 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6926 out of 8472 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8472 out of 97279 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.759500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.759500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 97279 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 84.1358 to 122.8237 deg, Dec +55.3686 to +67.4100 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 84.1358 to 122.8237 deg, Dec 55.3686 to 67.4100 deg
Loaded 13005 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6926 out of 8472 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8472 out of 97279 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 96840 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 84.1354 to 122.8857 deg, Dec +55.3682 to +67.4159 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 84.1354 to 122.8857 deg, Dec 55.3682 to 67.4159 deg
Loaded 13027 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6918 out of 8472 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8472 out of 96840 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 151 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
2.0 pix Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
15.5 mag. Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.3 (SNR ) 13.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.xusQ6XAFF4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=7532, bad_region=1, passed=97257
Got 97257 stars (including 89565 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 97257 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 97257 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 97257 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 97257 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5394)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.247 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.242 n_q1=1050 n_q2=1298 n_q3=1138 n_q4=1418 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.183
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits -region wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5YqesL1Ee7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=29, blended=7337, bad_region=5, passed=96811
Got 96811 stars (including 89296 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 96811 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 96811 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 96811 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 96811 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5393)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=1046 n_q2=1322 n_q3=1117 n_q4=1419 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.314
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits -region wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3ZBERQ7mEw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=653, bad_region=30, passed=24830
Got 24830 stars (including 24097 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24830 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013111 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010489 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4869 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24830 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24830 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24830 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4870 stars left (next iteration limit 5355)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=8.084 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=18.361 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.655 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.900 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.521 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.814 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4870 robust_rms_before=1.299 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.432 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.521 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.557 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.814
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.557 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits N_match=4870 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.584 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.457 n_q1=1496 n_q2=887 n_q3=1697 n_q4=790 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.371
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vgW4Rtemsu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=632, bad_region=33, passed=25304
Got 25304 stars (including 24591 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25304 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013111 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010489 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4869 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25304 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25304 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25304 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4870 stars left (next iteration limit 5355)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=7.681 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=18.091 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.583 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.181 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.503 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.720 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4870 robust_rms_before=1.199 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.422 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.503 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.563 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.720
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.563 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits N_match=4870 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.440 n_q1=1512 n_q2=872 n_q3=1674 n_q4=812 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.348
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-35-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0314.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_023740_TTUQ1b1x1_2610168_tnQWduxT/wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 06:01:29.21 +59:47:48.0: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 06:04:08.83 +62:19:46.4: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:01:29.21 +59:47:48.0: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:04:08.83 +62:19:46.4: 11.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:29.21 +59:47:48.0: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2389 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.69 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:04:08.83 +62:19:46.4: ref_mag=11.69 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7719 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 05:55:30.65 +64:19:00.6: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:55:30.65 +64:19:00.6: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:55:30.65 +64:19:00.6: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4494 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 06:08:07.37 +62:59:20.0: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:08:07.37 +62:59:20.0: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:07.37 +62:59:20.0: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6403 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 06:17:12.22 +63:17:31.4: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:17:12.22 +63:17:31.4: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:17:12.22 +63:17:31.4: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9631 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 07:31:22.11 +62:30:15.7: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:31:22.11 +62:30:15.7: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:22.11 +62:30:15.7: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6641 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 07:36:36.22 +57:31:53.6: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 07:46:09.44 +58:48:21.8: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 06:32:39.95 +63:15:45.1: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 06:26:46.36 +62:30:54.4: 13.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:36:36.22 +57:31:53.6: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:36:36.22 +57:31:53.6: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9420 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:46:09.44 +58:48:21.8: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:32:39.95 +63:15:45.1: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:32:39.95 +63:15:45.1: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7293 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:46:09.44 +58:48:21.8: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1292 delta=1.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 06:14:39.54 +61:18:39.1: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:26:46.36 +62:30:54.4: 13.59 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:26:46.36 +62:30:54.4: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6233 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:14:39.54 +61:18:39.1: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:14:39.54 +61:18:39.1: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6828 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 07:41:59.13 +57:57:19.5: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 07:42:09.68 +59:16:57.7: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:41:59.13 +57:57:19.5: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:41:59.13 +57:57:19.5: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8046 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:42:09.68 +59:16:57.7: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:42:09.68 +59:16:57.7: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9743 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 07:46:25.32 +58:37:01.8: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:46:25.32 +58:37:01.8: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:46:25.32 +58:37:01.8: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6936 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 07:40:15.50 +58:46:46.7: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:40:15.50 +58:46:46.7: 12.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:40:15.50 +58:46:46.7: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6094 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 07:30:59.70 +57:47:06.7: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:30:59.70 +57:47:06.7: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:30:59.70 +57:47:06.7: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4502 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-14-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 07:39:48.19 +58:05:43.9: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:39:48.19 +58:05:43.9: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:39:48.19 +58:05:43.9: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2556 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35983.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out42942.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53441.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out64871.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out65312.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out65360.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out65933.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82118.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92757.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out94539.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out96670.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 275s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 9s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114845_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 114845_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114847_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 114847_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114848_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 114848_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114858_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 114858_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114874_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 114874_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114886_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 114886_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114898_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 114898_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114909_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 114909_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114914_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 114914_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114921_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 114921_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114923_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 114923_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114936_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 114936_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114963_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 114963_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114965_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 114965_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114984_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 114984_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114986_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 114986_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114997_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 114997_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114998_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 114998_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115024_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115024_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115034_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115034_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115036_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115036_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:39.94 +66:14:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115040_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115040_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115041_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115041_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115046_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115046_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115049_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115049_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115054_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115054_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115061_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115061_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115062_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115062_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115063_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115063_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115065_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115065_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115066_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115066_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115072_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115072_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115076_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115076_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115085_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115085_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115089_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115089_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115094_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115094_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115103_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115103_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115105_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115105_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115106_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115106_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115111_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115111_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115114_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115114_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:05.45 +57:51:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115118_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115118_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115120_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115120_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:51.39 +60:06:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115130_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115130_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:53.77 +58:57:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115132_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115132_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115136_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115136_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115144_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115144_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115155_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115155_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115156_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115156_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115157_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115157_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115159_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115159_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115160_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115160_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115161_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115161_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115163_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115163_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115170_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115170_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115172_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115172_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115174_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115174_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:12.85 +56:55:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115180_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115180_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115185_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115185_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115186_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115186_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115187_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115187_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115192_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115192_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115194_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115194_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115197_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115197_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:08.63 +59:23:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115198_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115198_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115199_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115199_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:36.26 +57:11:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115204_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115204_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115207_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115207_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115209_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115209_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:16.91 +63:17:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115211_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115211_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:04.61 +65:00:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115216_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115216_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115217_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115217_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:21.39 +61:54:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115223_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115223_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:41.04 +66:39:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115249_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115249_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115256_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115256_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115258_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115258_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115271_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115271_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115272_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115272_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115286_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115286_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115288_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115288_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115304_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115304_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:37.00 +57:49:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115308_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115308_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115311_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115311_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115318_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115318_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115329_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115329_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115334_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115334_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115337_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115337_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:44.21 +60:58:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115338_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115338_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115343_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115343_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115345_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115345_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115349_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115349_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115354_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115354_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115355_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115355_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115358_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115358_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115364_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115364_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115367_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115367_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115368_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115368_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115374_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115374_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:20.29 +65:16:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115375_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115375_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115380_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115380_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115381_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115381_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115382_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115382_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115392_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115392_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115394_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115394_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115396_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115396_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115397_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115397_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115402_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115402_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115403_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115403_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115404_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115404_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115405_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115405_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115406_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115406_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115407_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115407_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115412_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115412_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115417_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115417_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115418_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115418_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115421_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115421_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115424_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115424_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115426_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115426_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115427_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 115427_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87935_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 87935_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:14.12 +59:26:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04254_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 04254_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:54:26.50 +65:18:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64871_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
Preparing report for the candidate 64871_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35204_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 35204_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94539_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
Preparing report for the candidate 94539_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03623_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 03623_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35983_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
Preparing report for the candidate 35983_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33005_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 33005_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42942_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
Preparing report for the candidate 42942_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70996_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 70996_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:33.54 +60:56:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53441_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
Preparing report for the candidate 53441_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68080_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 68080_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44262_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 44262_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:34.24 +62:19:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92971_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 92971_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92630_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 92630_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65563_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 65563_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19924_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 19924_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81291_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 81291_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:25.18 +58:39:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96670_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
Preparing report for the candidate 96670_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65312_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
Preparing report for the candidate 65312_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81053_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 81053_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65933_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
Preparing report for the candidate 65933_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81832_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 81832_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92757_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
Preparing report for the candidate 92757_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31388_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 31388_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82118_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
Preparing report for the candidate 82118_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65360_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
Preparing report for the candidate 65360_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88583_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 88583_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:04.97 +59:26:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80361_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 80361_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:16.46 +58:25:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93439_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 93439_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:54.22 +59:38:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78906_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 78906_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:49.37 +57:04:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92778_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315
The candidate 92778_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_02-36-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0315 did not pass the final checks
