This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.3047 2461269.8047 14.21 19:04:37.98 +67:13:12.6
97.97869 23.61494 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.8" and 0.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 19:04:37.98 +67:13:12.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:04:37.98 +67:13:12.6: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:04:37.98 +67:13:12.6: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461269.8047,14.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260817.3047 14.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.3047 2461269.8047 14.04 19:20:16.40 +73:14:14.6
104.70085 23.85343 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.8" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 19:20:16.40 +73:14:14.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:20:16.40 +73:14:14.6: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:20:16.40 +73:14:14.6: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461269.8047,14.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260817.3047 14.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.3047 2461269.8047 12.03 18:51:29.91 +70:25:20.4
101.15091 25.43861 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 0.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS J1851295+702520
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.505 R1 Y 0.734 R1 170.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 18:51:29.91 +70:25:20.4: 12.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 18:51:29.91 +70:25:20.4: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J1851295+702520,2461269.8047,12.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J1851295+702520 20260817.3047 12.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461202.84134294 11.06.2026 08:11:22.030 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
First image: 2461202.84134294 11.06.2026 08:11:22.030 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
Last image: 2461269.80495507 17.08.2026 07:18:58.118 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 0
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 12852
Objects passed selection criteria: 12804
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9045.5
Average stars matched: 8337.25 (92.1701 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 237964 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 17 02:28:46 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461202.84134294 11.06.2026 08:11:22.030 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
First image: 2461202.84134294 11.06.2026 08:11:22.030 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
Last image: 2461269.80495507 17.08.2026 07:18:58.118 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 183
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 26 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 79247
Objects passed selection criteria: 79036
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 59183
Average stars matched: 54108.5 (91.4257 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 291512 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 17 02:29:48 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461269.80446950
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:05.049 +70:01:39.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:53.889 +70:00:36.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:05.049 +70:01:39.09
Second-epoch image center 19:11:53.889 +70:00:36.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0236 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:55.006 +70:00:38.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:05.049 +70:01:39.09
Second-epoch image center 19:11:55.006 +70:00:38.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0220 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:11:53.889 +70:00:36.23
Second-epoch second image center 19:11:55.006 +70:00:38.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00176 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits &> /tmp/tmp.s5QXoGoCfR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cBZIXYiTni
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GBpE4mzUnf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UVAPfXfvop
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits and wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits and wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits and wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 15402 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 260.2575 to 316.2869 deg, Dec +63.6442 to +75.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 260.2575 to 316.2869 deg, Dec 63.6442 to 75.2942 deg
Loaded 13053 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7897 out of 8250 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8250 out of 15402 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.691200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.691200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 15402 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 260.2575 to 316.2869 deg, Dec +63.6442 to +75.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 260.2575 to 316.2869 deg, Dec 63.6442 to 75.2942 deg
Loaded 13053 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7897 out of 8250 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8250 out of 15402 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 15513 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 260.2579 to 316.2882 deg, Dec +63.6441 to +75.2969 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 260.2579 to 316.2882 deg, Dec 63.6441 to 75.2969 deg
Loaded 13055 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7907 out of 8266 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8266 out of 15513 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
2.2 pix Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
2.2 pix fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
2.2 pix fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
15.3 mag. Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.s5QXoGoCfR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=7, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=889, bad_region=3680, passed=15395
Got 15395 stars (including 10990 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15395 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5386)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.413 n_q1=1563 n_q2=1085 n_q3=1372 n_q4=877 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.090
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits -region wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cBZIXYiTni (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=885, bad_region=3629, passed=15513
Got 15513 stars (including 11153 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15513 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12647 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12647 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12647 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.430 n_q1=1569 n_q2=1079 n_q3=1374 n_q4=874 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.142
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits -region wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GBpE4mzUnf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=413, bad_region=1422, passed=7941
Got 7941 stars (including 6179 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7941 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6814 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6814 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6814 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5382)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=6.136 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.648 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=0.430 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.506 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=0.386 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.418 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4893 robust_rms_before=0.610 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.403 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.386 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.430 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.418
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.430 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.382 n_q1=1342 n_q2=658 n_q3=1958 n_q4=935 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UVAPfXfvop (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=390, bad_region=1403, passed=7672
Got 7672 stars (including 5940 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7672 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6563 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6563 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6563 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4894 stars left (next iteration limit 5383)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4894 robust_rms=6.086 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.692 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4894 robust_rms=0.434 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.509 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4894 robust_rms=0.388 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.417 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4894 robust_rms_before=0.598 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.407 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.388 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.441 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.417
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.441 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits N_match=4894 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.418 n_q1=1337 n_q2=664 n_q3=1975 n_q4=918 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.098
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits sigma_overall=0.379 worst_q_ratio=1.090
ref2=Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.142
new1=fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits sigma_overall=0.409 worst_q_ratio=1.120
new2=fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits sigma_overall=0.419 worst_q_ratio=1.098
reference average sigma_overall=0.378 worst_q_ratio=1.116
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238_astrometric_residuals.png (4897 matched stars from wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239_astrometric_residuals.png (4896 matched stars from wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318_astrometric_residuals.png (4893 matched stars from wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319_astrometric_residuals.png (4894 matched stars from wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:05.049 +70:01:39.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:53.889 +70:00:36.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:05.049 +70:01:39.09
Second-epoch image center 19:11:53.889 +70:00:36.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0236 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:55.006 +70:00:38.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:05.049 +70:01:39.09
Second-epoch image center 19:11:55.006 +70:00:38.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0220 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:11:53.889 +70:00:36.23
Second-epoch second image center 19:11:55.006 +70:00:38.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00176 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BY31OwKnGA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iRbIiNiyzT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7numoim2H2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6JGG9ruEpS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits and wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits and wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits and wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 87306 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 259.8704 to 316.2868 deg, Dec +63.5731 to +75.2954 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 259.8704 to 316.2868 deg, Dec 63.5731 to 75.2954 deg
Loaded 13259 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7206 out of 8361 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8361 out of 87306 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.553500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.553500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.08
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 87306 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 259.8704 to 316.2868 deg, Dec +63.5731 to +75.2954 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 259.8704 to 316.2868 deg, Dec 63.5731 to 75.2954 deg
Loaded 13259 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7206 out of 8361 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8361 out of 87306 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 87167 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 259.8495 to 316.2882 deg, Dec +63.6400 to +75.3023 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 259.8495 to 316.2882 deg, Dec 63.6400 to 75.3023 deg
Loaded 13146 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7230 out of 8373 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8373 out of 87167 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 125 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
2.1 pix Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
2.1 pix fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
2.1 pix fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
15.5 mag. Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.BY31OwKnGA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=6474, bad_region=14130, passed=87289
Got 87289 stars (including 68116 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 87289 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.415 n_q1=1549 n_q2=1051 n_q3=1436 n_q4=873 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.113
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits -region wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iRbIiNiyzT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=6408, bad_region=13846, passed=87157
Got 87157 stars (including 68236 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 87157 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.419 n_q1=1559 n_q2=1045 n_q3=1431 n_q4=874 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.150
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits -region wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7numoim2H2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2654, bad_region=6375, passed=52720
Got 52720 stars (including 44173 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52720 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4902 stars left (next iteration limit 5391)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4902 robust_rms=6.048 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.083 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4902 robust_rms=0.429 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.505 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4902 robust_rms=0.379 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.413 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4902 robust_rms_before=0.597 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.391 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.379 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.423 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.413
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.423 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits N_match=4902 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.374 n_q1=1370 n_q2=653 n_q3=1952 n_q4=927 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6JGG9ruEpS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=2551, bad_region=6228, passed=51531
Got 51531 stars (including 43207 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51531 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5394)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4904 robust_rms=6.041 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.251 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4904 robust_rms=0.430 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.505 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4904 robust_rms=0.383 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.414 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4904 robust_rms_before=0.589 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.399 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.383 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.432 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.414
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.432 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.396 n_q1=1357 n_q2=661 n_q3=1972 n_q4=914 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_022628_TTUQ2b1x1_613444_1VYmwHOg/wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:24:56.12 +65:56:48.3: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:37:33.11 +68:43:09.1: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:49:46.80 +69:03:41.9: 14.14 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:34:26.56 +68:36:02.4: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 20:01:54.01 +73:43:07.1: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:50:59.31 +68:44:27.8: 15.03 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:54:34.73 +66:41:45.5: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:27:35.28 +67:53:40.3: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:37:33.11 +68:43:09.1: 14.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 20:01:54.01 +73:43:07.1: 14.04 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:50:59.31 +68:44:27.8: 14.93 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:24:56.12 +65:56:48.3: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:49:46.80 +69:03:41.9: 14.10 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:34:26.56 +68:36:02.4: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:54:34.73 +66:41:45.5: 13.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:37:33.11 +68:43:09.1: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0096 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:54.01 +73:43:07.1: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7539 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:50:59.31 +68:44:27.8: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5425 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:24:56.12 +65:56:48.3: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1239 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:49:46.80 +69:03:41.9: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1787 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:34:26.56 +68:36:02.4: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1840 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:34.73 +66:41:45.5: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2033 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:43:12.42 +65:47:03.2: 13.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:27:35.28 +67:53:40.3: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:27:35.28 +67:53:40.3: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7933 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:43:12.42 +65:47:03.2: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:12.42 +65:47:03.2: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8945 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:46:57.01 +66:30:13.5: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:44:59.30 +68:17:08.1: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:45:47.88 +66:25:14.1: 13.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:53:19.98 +67:44:02.1: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:41:54.44 +66:29:42.0: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:26:29.72 +69:12:25.7: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:46:57.01 +66:30:13.5: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:57.01 +66:30:13.5: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8155 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:41:54.44 +66:29:42.0: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:53:19.98 +67:44:02.1: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:44:59.30 +68:17:08.1: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:54.44 +66:29:42.0: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9986 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:44:59.30 +68:17:08.1: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5048 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:19.98 +67:44:02.1: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8358 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:45:47.88 +66:25:14.1: 13.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:26:29.72 +69:12:25.7: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:47.88 +66:25:14.1: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2977 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:26:29.72 +69:12:25.7: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3799 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:32:29.01 +71:48:41.1: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:32:29.01 +71:48:41.1: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:32:29.01 +71:48:41.1: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7599 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:44:29.61 +66:50:16.6: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 18:24:20.54 +69:05:18.9: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:18:07.65 +70:53:55.1: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:44:29.61 +66:50:16.6: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:44:29.61 +66:50:16.6: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6428 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 18:24:20.54 +69:05:18.9: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:24:20.54 +69:05:18.9: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2701 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:18:07.65 +70:53:55.1: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:18:07.65 +70:53:55.1: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5599 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:04:37.98 +67:13:12.6: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:04:37.98 +67:13:12.6: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:20:16.40 +73:14:14.6: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:20:16.40 +73:14:14.6: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 18:51:29.91 +70:25:20.4: 12.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 18:51:29.91 +70:25:20.4: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:51:29.91 +70:25:20.4: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0248 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out114706.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out115830.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51408.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 29s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103313_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 103313_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103316_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 103316_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103318_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 103318_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103324_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 103324_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103329_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 103329_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103331_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 103331_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:37:05.24 +65:54:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103332_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 103332_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103333_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 103333_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103335_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 103335_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103337_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 103337_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103339_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 103339_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:49:03.72 +66:23:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103349_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 103349_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103350_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 103350_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:13:46.50 +67:34:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103351_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 103351_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103352_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 103352_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103354_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 103354_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:38.68 +69:53:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103356_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 103356_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103359_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 103359_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103362_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 103362_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103363_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 103363_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:57:38.79 +68:09:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103366_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 103366_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103367_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 103367_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103371_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 103371_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103372_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 103372_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:58:33.90 +72:13:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103374_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 103374_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:34.42 +66:50:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104927_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 104927_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106091_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 106091_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106630_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 106630_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106709_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 106709_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107053_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 107053_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107197_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 107197_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:05:22.34 +73:26:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107378_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 107378_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107405_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 107405_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107551_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 107551_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107568_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 107568_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107646_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 107646_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107702_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 107702_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:52:39.02 +66:43:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107739_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 107739_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107744_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 107744_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107832_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 107832_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108097_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 108097_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108113_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 108113_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108136_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 108136_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:06:24.34 +71:56:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108248_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 108248_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108266_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 108266_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108271_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 108271_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108296_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 108296_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108369_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 108369_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108419_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 108419_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:57:47.71 +71:55:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108740_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 108740_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108958_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 108958_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109016_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 109016_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109023_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 109023_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109058_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 109058_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:24:05.53 +72:33:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109131_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 109131_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109256_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 109256_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109429_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 109429_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109657_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 109657_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109814_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 109814_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109900_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 109900_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:19:25.86 +71:31:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110021_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 110021_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110032_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 110032_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110041_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 110041_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:12:44.23 +67:42:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110119_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 110119_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:11:20.02 +66:59:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110246_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 110246_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110506_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 110506_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:04.39 +68:57:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110583_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 110583_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110911_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 110911_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110966_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 110966_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111434_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 111434_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111490_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 111490_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111564_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 111564_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111622_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 111622_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111697_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 111697_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111703_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 111703_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111718_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 111718_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:31:22.75 +70:59:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111775_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 111775_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111832_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 111832_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111916_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 111916_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:47:08.94 +72:28:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111960_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 111960_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111996_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 111996_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112183_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 112183_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:47.00 +66:27:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112295_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 112295_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:01:21.15 +70:27:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112300_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 112300_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112369_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 112369_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112463_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 112463_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112476_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 112476_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:24.42 +71:20:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112611_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 112611_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112671_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 112671_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112881_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 112881_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113286_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 113286_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:32:09.45 +71:20:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113292_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 113292_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113664_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 113664_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113822_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 113822_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:27:25.80 +67:15:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113831_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 113831_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114075_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 114075_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114529_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 114529_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:23:55.06 +69:41:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114678_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 114678_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114706_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
Preparing report for the candidate 114706_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114915_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 114915_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115051_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 115051_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115170_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 115170_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115193_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 115193_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115287_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 115287_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115375_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 115375_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115388_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 115388_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115429_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 115429_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:29:53.48 +70:55:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115568_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 115568_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115614_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 115614_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115702_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 115702_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115754_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 115754_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115778_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 115778_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115826_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 115826_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115830_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
Preparing report for the candidate 115830_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115911_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 115911_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115986_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 115986_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116222_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 116222_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116254_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 116254_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116387_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 116387_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52675_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 52675_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12271_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 12271_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33541_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 33541_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51408_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
Preparing report for the candidate 51408_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49207_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 49207_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:22:01.30 +69:50:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26013_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319
The candidate 26013_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_02-18-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0319 did not pass the final checks