This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.2695 2461269.7695 11.09 22:40:51.95 -10:07:22.2
55.57999 -54.87410 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 3.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.5 Astraea 0 -0 0 11.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:40:51.95 -10:07:22.2: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:40:51.95 -10:07:22.2: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.7695,11.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.2695 11.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.2695 2461269.7695 12.24 22:59:35.87 -12:00:51.3
57.40005 -59.74602 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 3.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.117 Lomia -0 -1 1 12.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:59:35.87 -12:00:51.3: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:59:35.87 -12:00:51.3: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.7695,12.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.2695 12.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.2695 2461269.7695 13.20 23:32:08.84 -07:37:09.5
75.35591 -62.91353 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 4.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.442 Eichsfeldia -1 -0 1 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:32:08.84 -07:37:09.5: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:32:08.84 -07:37:09.5: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.7695,13.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.2695 13.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.2695 2461269.7695 13.37 22:43:25.36 -09:57:49.7
56.42199 -55.30916 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 3.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.303 Josephina 0 0 0 13.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:43:25.36 -09:57:49.7: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:43:25.36 -09:57:49.7: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.7695,13.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.2695 13.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.2695 2461269.7695 13.51 22:59:44.19 -07:44:27.7
63.97798 -57.20454 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 3.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.208 Lacrimosa -1 -0 1 13.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:59:44.19 -07:44:27.7: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:59:44.19 -07:44:27.7: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.7695,13.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.2695 13.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.2695 2461269.7695 13.80 22:54:03.15 -12:04:14.4
55.84453 -58.64733 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 3.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.367 Amicitia 0 -1 1 13.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:54:03.15 -12:04:14.4: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:54:03.15 -12:04:14.4: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.7695,13.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.2695 13.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.2695 2461269.7695 14.23 22:50:33.65 -06:56:42.8
62.50478 -54.93874 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 4.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.846 Lipperta -0 -1 1 14.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:50:33.65 -06:56:42.8: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:50:33.65 -06:56:42.8: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.7695,14.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.2695 14.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93886633 21.07.2026 10:31:48.051 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
First image: 2461242.93886633 21.07.2026 10:31:48.051 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Last image: 2461269.76972047 17.08.2026 06:28:13.849 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.66
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5887
Objects passed selection criteria: 5885
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5692.25
Average stars matched: 5560 (97.6767 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232176 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 17 01:34:26 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93886633 21.07.2026 10:31:48.051 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
First image: 2461242.93886633 21.07.2026 10:31:48.051 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Last image: 2461269.76972047 17.08.2026 06:28:13.849 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 121
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 18 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 32464
Objects passed selection criteria: 32381
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 30866.5
Average stars matched: 30085.2 (97.4689 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 255352 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 17 01:35:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461269.76918090
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:26.681 -09:59:49.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:31.372 -10:04:44.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:26.681 -09:59:49.86
Second-epoch image center 23:08:31.372 -10:04:44.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0842 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:30.205 -10:04:29.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:26.681 -09:59:49.86
Second-epoch image center 23:08:30.205 -10:04:29.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0791 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:08:31.372 -10:04:44.97
Second-epoch second image center 23:08:30.205 -10:04:29.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00636 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SmcILJcFzt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits &> /tmp/tmp.q1yUvq3zqC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits &> /tmp/tmp.M8OUBEf2T2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits &> /tmp/tmp.awni7mikyY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5808 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 338.6972 to 355.2893 deg, Dec -15.5986 to -4.2778 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 338.6972 to 355.2893 deg, Dec -15.5986 to -4.2778 deg
Loaded 5067 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3713 out of 3841 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3841 out of 5808 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.688000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.688000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.66
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.03
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.03
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5808 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 338.6972 to 355.2893 deg, Dec -15.5986 to -4.2778 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 338.6972 to 355.2893 deg, Dec -15.5986 to -4.2778 deg
Loaded 5067 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3713 out of 3841 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3841 out of 5808 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits (aperture=5.8)
Read 5775 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 338.6970 to 355.2476 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.2790 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 338.6970 to 355.2476 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.2790 deg
Loaded 5057 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3732 out of 3864 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3864 out of 5775 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits (aperture=5.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
2.1 pix Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
2.6 pix fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
2.6 pix fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
15.0 mag. Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.SmcILJcFzt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=422, bad_region=0, passed=5808
Got 5808 stars (including 5379 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5808 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4825 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4819 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4825 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4819 stars left (next iteration limit 5300)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits N_match=4819 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=1129 n_q2=1215 n_q3=1239 n_q4=1236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits -region wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.q1yUvq3zqC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=432, bad_region=0, passed=5775
Got 5775 stars (including 5335 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5775 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4820 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4813 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4812 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4812 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4812 stars left (next iteration limit 5294)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits N_match=4812 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=1134 n_q2=1213 n_q3=1229 n_q4=1236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits -region wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.M8OUBEf2T2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=328, bad_region=0, passed=5648
Got 5648 stars (including 5315 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5648 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4813 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5648 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4820 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5648 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5648 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4813 stars left (next iteration limit 5294)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4813 robust_rms=10.018 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.406 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4813 robust_rms=0.352 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.363 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4813 robust_rms=0.266 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.298 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4813 robust_rms_before=0.954 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.253 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.266 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.281 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.298
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.281 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits N_match=4813 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.247 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.247 n_q1=1246 n_q2=1181 n_q3=1277 n_q4=1109 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.099
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.awni7mikyY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=331, bad_region=0, passed=5691
Got 5691 stars (including 5357 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5691 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4814 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4814 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4814 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4818 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4813 stars left (next iteration limit 5295)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4813 robust_rms=10.075 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.223 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4813 robust_rms=0.358 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.375 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4813 robust_rms=0.262 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.281 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4813 robust_rms_before=0.967 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.246 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.262 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.274 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.281
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.274 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits N_match=4813 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.251 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.236 n_q1=1244 n_q2=1177 n_q3=1280 n_q4=1112 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.074
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits sigma_overall=0.326 worst_q_ratio=1.175
ref2=Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits sigma_overall=0.335 worst_q_ratio=1.160
new1=fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits sigma_overall=0.261 worst_q_ratio=1.099
new2=fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits sigma_overall=0.254 worst_q_ratio=1.074
reference average sigma_overall=0.3305 worst_q_ratio=1.1675
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865_astrometric_residuals.png (4819 matched stars from wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866_astrometric_residuals.png (4812 matched stars from wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248_astrometric_residuals.png (4813 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249_astrometric_residuals.png (4813 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aqr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:06:43.63 -14:58:34.1: 11.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:05:11.54 -09:30:17.2: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:40:51.95 -10:07:22.2: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:05:50.46 -08:35:36.2: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:21:12.99 -06:09:37.8: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:05:50.89 -08:54:58.3: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:40:51.95 -10:07:22.2: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:05:11.54 -09:30:17.2: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:05:50.46 -08:35:36.2: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:21:12.99 -06:09:37.8: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:06:43.63 -14:58:34.1: 11.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:05:50.89 -08:54:58.3: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:05:11.54 -09:30:17.2: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9558 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.10 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:05:50.46 -08:35:36.2: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0390 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:21:12.99 -06:09:37.8: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9934 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:06:43.63 -14:58:34.1: ref_mag=11.10 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3082 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:05:50.89 -08:54:58.3: ref_mag=11.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7534 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20266.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20248_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 20248_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20251_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 20251_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:15:51.69 -09:04:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20266_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 20266_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20284_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 20284_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20295_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 20295_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20296_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 20296_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20298_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 20298_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aqr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
22:40:51.95 -10:07:22.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:26.681 -09:59:49.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:31.372 -10:04:44.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:26.681 -09:59:49.86
Second-epoch image center 23:08:31.372 -10:04:44.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0842 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:30.205 -10:04:29.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:26.681 -09:59:49.86
Second-epoch image center 23:08:30.205 -10:04:29.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0791 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:08:31.372 -10:04:44.97
Second-epoch second image center 23:08:30.205 -10:04:29.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00636 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pczpb9wJHd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CK93o888P5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits &> /tmp/tmp.A7EP0cTbDw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1yys4omCtn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits and wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 34068 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 338.6972 to 355.2893 deg, Dec -15.5986 to -4.2119 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 338.6972 to 355.2893 deg, Dec -15.5986 to -4.2119 deg
Loaded 5099 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3749 out of 4056 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4056 out of 34068 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.580800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.580800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 34068 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 338.6972 to 355.2893 deg, Dec -15.5986 to -4.2119 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 338.6972 to 355.2893 deg, Dec -15.5986 to -4.2119 deg
Loaded 5099 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3749 out of 4056 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4056 out of 34068 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 33982 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 338.6760 to 355.2847 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.2199 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 338.6760 to 355.2847 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.2199 deg
Loaded 5102 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3745 out of 4059 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4059 out of 33982 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 106 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
1.9 pix Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
15.2 mag. Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.pczpb9wJHd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1262, bad_region=23, passed=34058
Got 34058 stars (including 32704 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34058 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4824 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4820 stars left (next iteration limit 5302)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits N_match=4820 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=1169 n_q2=1235 n_q3=1220 n_q4=1196 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.170
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits -region wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CK93o888P5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits' -> 'wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1275, bad_region=24, passed=33972
Got 33972 stars (including 32618 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33972 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4822 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4817 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4822 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4817 stars left (next iteration limit 5298)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits N_match=4817 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=1164 n_q2=1233 n_q3=1221 n_q4=1199 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.185
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits -region wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.A7EP0cTbDw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1001, bad_region=26, passed=28242
Got 28242 stars (including 27175 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28242 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4820 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4815 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4821 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4815 stars left (next iteration limit 5296)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4815 robust_rms=9.986 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.372 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4815 robust_rms=0.351 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.362 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4815 robust_rms=0.265 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.292 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4815 robust_rms_before=0.949 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.249 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.265 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.270 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.292
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.270 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits N_match=4815 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.248 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.242 n_q1=1219 n_q2=1152 n_q3=1312 n_q4=1132 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.089
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1yys4omCtn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1020, bad_region=29, passed=28255
Got 28255 stars (including 27165 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28255 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4817 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28255 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4822 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28255 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28255 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4816 stars left (next iteration limit 5298)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4816 robust_rms=10.209 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.517 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4816 robust_rms=0.361 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.377 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4816 robust_rms=0.260 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.277 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4816 robust_rms_before=0.962 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.244 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.260 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.265 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.277
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.265 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits N_match=4816 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.250 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.236 n_q1=1225 n_q2=1160 n_q3=1298 n_q4=1133 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.081
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits -region wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-27-27_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0248.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_012953_TTUQ1b1x1_3787318_AmgoRMoI/wcs_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aqr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:04:10.79 -07:59:09.9: 14.11 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:37:30.16 -12:36:37.2: 14.37 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:25:26.38 -11:26:08.6: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:59:35.87 -12:00:51.3: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:37:30.16 -12:36:37.2: 14.50 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:25:26.38 -11:26:08.6: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:59:35.87 -12:00:51.3: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:04:10.79 -07:59:09.9: 14.30 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:37:30.16 -12:36:37.2: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3024 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:25:26.38 -11:26:08.6: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1955 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:04:10.79 -07:59:09.9: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2978 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:32:08.84 -07:37:09.5: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:43:25.36 -09:57:49.7: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:15:32.41 -11:36:57.7: 13.45 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:32:08.84 -07:37:09.5: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:59:44.19 -07:44:27.7: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:43:25.36 -09:57:49.7: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:15:32.41 -11:36:57.7: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:59:44.19 -07:44:27.7: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:15:32.41 -11:36:57.7: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4412 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:00:25.49 -08:53:16.5: 13.89 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:54:03.15 -12:04:14.4: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:00:25.49 -08:53:16.5: 13.87 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:00:25.49 -08:53:16.5: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7818 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:54:03.15 -12:04:14.4: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:50:33.65 -06:56:42.8: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:44:25.62 -13:45:57.3: 14.86 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:46:58.52 -13:25:54.0: 14.88 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:50:33.65 -06:56:42.8: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:44:25.62 -13:45:57.3: 14.66 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:44:25.62 -13:45:57.3: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5384 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:46:58.52 -13:25:54.0: 14.79 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:46:58.52 -13:25:54.0: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4276 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:39:57.61 -05:37:53.2: 14.75 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:40:27.18 -06:35:40.1: 14.88 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 22:48:28.09 -11:17:26.9: 15.03 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:39:57.61 -05:37:53.2: 14.86 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:40:27.18 -06:35:40.1: 14.93 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:39:57.61 -05:37:53.2: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5792 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:40:27.18 -06:35:40.1: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6198 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 22:48:28.09 -11:17:26.9: 14.62 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:48:28.09 -11:17:26.9: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6585 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:27:47.43 -11:33:10.3: 15.13 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-31-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0865.fits at 23:34:28.98 -08:27:00.1: 14.95 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:27:47.43 -11:33:10.3: 15.18 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:27:47.43 -11:33:10.3: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6838 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0866.fits at 23:34:28.98 -08:27:00.1: 14.92 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:28.98 -08:27:00.1: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5050 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52432.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52508.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52511.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52550.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52601.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52689.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52369_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52369_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52372_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52372_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52375_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52375_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52382_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52382_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:15:51.71 -09:04:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52393_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52393_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52397_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52397_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:40:51.95 -10:07:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52413_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52413_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52422_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52422_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52428_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52428_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52432_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 52432_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52433_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52433_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52436_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52436_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52441_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52441_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52449_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52449_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52465_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52465_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52472_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52472_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52481_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52481_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52488_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52488_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52490_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52490_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52498_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52498_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52504_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52504_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52505_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52505_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52506_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52506_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52507_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52507_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52508_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 52508_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52511_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 52511_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52514_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52514_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52526_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52526_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52532_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52532_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52533_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52533_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52538_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52538_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52541_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52541_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52542_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52542_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52549_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52549_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52550_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 52550_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52551_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52551_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52556_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52556_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52558_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52558_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52568_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52568_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52569_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52569_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52575_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52575_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52578_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52578_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52582_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52582_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52583_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52583_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52586_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52586_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52591_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52591_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52593_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52593_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52601_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 52601_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52602_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52602_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52611_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52611_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52615_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52615_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52625_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52625_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52628_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52628_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52630_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52630_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52633_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52633_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52634_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52634_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52635_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52635_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52638_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52638_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52639_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52639_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52640_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52640_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52641_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52641_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52646_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52646_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52648_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52648_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52652_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52652_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52656_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52656_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52658_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52658_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52659_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52659_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52662_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52662_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52664_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52664_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52665_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52665_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52668_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52668_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52671_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52671_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52675_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52675_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52677_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52677_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52678_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52678_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52680_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52680_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52681_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52681_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52683_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52683_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52684_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52684_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52688_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52688_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52689_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 52689_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52693_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52693_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52694_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52694_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52695_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52695_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52697_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52697_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52699_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52699_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52700_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52700_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52702_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52702_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52705_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52705_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52709_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52709_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52711_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52711_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52722_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52722_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52727_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52727_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52728_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52728_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52738_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52738_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52740_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52740_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52741_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52741_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52746_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52746_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52747_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52747_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52749_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52749_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52760_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52760_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52762_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52762_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52768_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52768_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52773_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52773_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52788_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 52788_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15240_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249
The candidate 15240_fd_Aqr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_01-28-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0249 did not pass the final checks
