Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 17.1756  2461269.6756  14.05  11:06:52.54 +65:04:57.5
139.23394  48.60320 galactic  UMa  Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.1" and 0.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 11:06:52.54 +65:04:57.5 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 11:06:52.54 +65:04:57.5:  16.05 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 11:06:52.54 +65:04:57.5:  16.04 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits


fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits


fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits  wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits -crosshair 8302.34473 1192.00305 image    wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits -crosshair 8301.98145 1192.00085 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 17.17564 11 06 52.54 +65 04 57.5          14.1 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 17.17539 11 06 51.92 +65 04 58.6          14.2 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 08 17.17589 11 06 53.16 +65 04 56.3          13.9 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 08 17.1756*  11 06 52.54 +65 04 57.5  14.1 U             UMa       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461269.6756,14.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260817.1756 14.05CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 17.1756  2461269.6756  14.70  12:45:54.55 +60:20:52.5
124.17963  56.76694 galactic  UMa  Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.7" and 0.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 12:45:54.55 +60:20:52.5 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:45:54.55 +60:20:52.5:  16.02 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:45:54.55 +60:20:52.5:  16.03 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits


fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits


fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits  wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits -crosshair 1357.85144 3686.99658 image    wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits -crosshair 1358.31494 3686.97095 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 17.17564 12 45 54.55 +60 20 52.5          14.7 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 17.17539 12 45 54.31 +60 20 52.9          14.7 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 08 17.17589 12 45 54.79 +60 20 52.1          14.7 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 08 17.1756*  12 45 54.55 +60 20 52.5  14.7 U             UMa       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461269.6756,14.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260817.1756 14.70CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461093.77304396 22.02.2026 06:33:00.998   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
First image: 2461093.77304396 22.02.2026 06:33:00.998   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Last  image: 2461269.67588522 17.08.2026 04:13:06.483   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  7314
Objects passed selection criteria:  7299
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.1    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.1    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 5872.5
Average stars matched: 5697.75 (97.0243 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   233272 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Mon Aug 17 00:02:21 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461093.77304396 22.02.2026 06:33:00.998   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
First image: 2461093.77304396 22.02.2026 06:33:00.998   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Last  image: 2461269.67588522 17.08.2026 04:13:06.483   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 113
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 15 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  36778
Objects passed selection criteria:  36674
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.3    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.3    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 31541.2
Average stars matched: 30235.5 (95.8602 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   258076 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Mon Aug 17 00:03:30 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-04-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-04-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-04-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 741674 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 741674 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits_preview.png'

UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits


renamed 'UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits_preview.png'

UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 482.7200
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 528.8252
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1198.1884
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 471.2944
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1200.4653
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 469.7137
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.48216
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.003
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 27.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-16T23:12:23.9643076' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-17T04:12:23.9643076' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61269.1752773612 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-17T04:12:33.8660274' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61269.1753919674 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     179.999463243278 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     61.9999740816567 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     22.2572222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     330.736944444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =      2.6248042628557 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-04'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29523 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29523 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 11.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 37.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               905.22 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 27.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                  5.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             3.600288 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/d_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits :)

Spent 0.715392 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/d_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 27.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-16T23:13:06.4837581' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-17T04:13:06.4837581' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =      61269.175769479 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-17T04:13:16.3840415' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61269.1758840741 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     179.999463296417 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     61.9999741125956 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     22.1858333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =             330.7825 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     2.63270864570606 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-04'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29523 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29523 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 11.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 37.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               905.22 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 27.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                  5.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             3.600288 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/d_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits :)

Spent 0.838599 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/d_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits



fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461269.67539310
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Image size: 941.9'x627.2'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.8'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:16.151 +62:00:19.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32
Second-epoch image center 12:00:16.151 +62:00:19.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0245 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.8'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:16.945 +62:00:17.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32
Second-epoch image center 12:00:16.945 +62:00:17.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0261 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  12:00:16.151 +62:00:19.83
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:16.945 +62:00:17.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00163 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00163 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZFWH2Ysv9V
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EnPpVceVIp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xU0XtW5Kdr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cI4HdIns72
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7332 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9729 to 198.4317 deg, Dec +55.2640 to +67.4533 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9729 to 198.4317 deg, Dec 55.2640 to 67.4533 deg
Loaded 6574 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3976 out of 4190 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4190 out of 7332 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.896950
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.896950
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.39

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.39

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7332 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9729 to 198.4317 deg, Dec +55.2640 to +67.4533 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9729 to 198.4317 deg, Dec 55.2640 to 67.4533 deg
Loaded 6574 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3976 out of 4190 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4190 out of 7332 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 7282 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9723 to 198.4317 deg, Dec +55.3313 to +67.4947 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9723 to 198.4317 deg, Dec 55.3313 to 67.4947 deg
Loaded 6542 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3979 out of 4176 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4176 out of 7282 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.2 pix  UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
 2.2 pix  UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.4 mag.  UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
 15.4 mag.  UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
 14.7 mag.  fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
 14.7 mag.  fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.7 (SNR )  11.8 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.ZFWH2Ysv9V (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=506, bad_region=0, passed=7332
Got 7332 stars (including 6822 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7332 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7332 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7332 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7332 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5396)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=1138 n_q2=1153 n_q3=1306 n_q4=1309 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.205
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EnPpVceVIp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=494, bad_region=0, passed=7282
Got 7282 stars (including 6779 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7282 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7282 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7282 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7282 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5397)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.343 n_q1=1150 n_q2=1156 n_q3=1305 n_q4=1295 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.252
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xU0XtW5Kdr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=258, bad_region=0, passed=4513
Got 4513 stars (including 4248 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4513 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4171 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4165 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4165 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4170 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4163 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4163 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 4163 stars left (next iteration limit 4581)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4163 robust_rms=10.221 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.069 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4163 robust_rms=0.507 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.541 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4163 robust_rms=0.360 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.433 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4163 robust_rms_before=0.928 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.294 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.360 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.330 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.433
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.330 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits N_match=4163 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.328 n_q1=1099 n_q2=1072 n_q3=1081 n_q4=911 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.103
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cI4HdIns72 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=251, bad_region=0, passed=4507
Got 4507 stars (including 4249 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4507 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4173 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4166 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4166 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4507 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4172 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4165 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4507 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4165 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4507 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Excluding outliers - 4165 stars left (next iteration limit 4582)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4165 robust_rms=10.259 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.770 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4165 robust_rms=0.443 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.469 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4165 robust_rms=0.346 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.426 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4165 robust_rms_before=0.891 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.305 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.346 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.341 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.426
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.341 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits N_match=4165 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1106 n_q2=1074 n_q3=1076 n_q4=909 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.098
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits sigma_overall=0.363 worst_q_ratio=1.205
ref2=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits sigma_overall=0.386 worst_q_ratio=1.252
new1=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits sigma_overall=0.302 worst_q_ratio=1.103
new2=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits sigma_overall=0.313 worst_q_ratio=1.098
reference average sigma_overall=0.3745 worst_q_ratio=1.2285
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278_astrometric_residuals.png (4906 matched stars from wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279_astrometric_residuals.png (4906 matched stars from wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118_astrometric_residuals.png (4163 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119_astrometric_residuals.png (4165 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01679_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 01679_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    7.51    12:36:23.22 +59:29:13.4   1953 4351   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

**** FOUND  12:36:23.23 +59:29:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Image size: 941.9'x627.2'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.8'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:16.151 +62:00:19.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32
Second-epoch image center 12:00:16.151 +62:00:19.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0245 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.8'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:16.945 +62:00:17.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32
Second-epoch image center 12:00:16.945 +62:00:17.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0261 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  12:00:16.151 +62:00:19.83
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:16.945 +62:00:17.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00163 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00163 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits &> /tmp/tmp.p6KEe19rKV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UJudXtj9dl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Gmmf8UpKfR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dRsONMHhd9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 37333 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9729 to 198.6786 deg, Dec +55.2253 to +67.4860 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9729 to 198.6786 deg, Dec 55.2253 to 67.4860 deg
Loaded 6642 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3749 out of 4194 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4194 out of 37333 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.792800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.792800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.52

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.52

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 37333 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9729 to 198.6786 deg, Dec +55.2253 to +67.4860 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9729 to 198.6786 deg, Dec 55.2253 to 67.4860 deg
Loaded 6642 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3749 out of 4194 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4194 out of 37333 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 37494 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9724 to 198.6777 deg, Dec +55.2649 to +67.4946 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9724 to 198.6777 deg, Dec 55.2649 to 67.4946 deg
Loaded 6625 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3749 out of 4189 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4189 out of 37494 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 98 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
 2.1 pix  UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.5 mag.  UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
 15.5 mag.  UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
 14.9 mag.  fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
 14.9 mag.  fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.9 (SNR )  14.3 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.p6KEe19rKV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1765, bad_region=9, passed=37315
Got 37315 stars (including 35474 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37315 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=1136 n_q2=1161 n_q3=1318 n_q4=1294 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.215
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UJudXtj9dl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1739, bad_region=9, passed=37476
Got 37476 stars (including 35663 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37476 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5396)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.325 n_q1=1133 n_q2=1164 n_q3=1311 n_q4=1298 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.224
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Gmmf8UpKfR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1035, bad_region=21, passed=26268
Got 26268 stars (including 25176 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26268 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26268 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26268 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26268 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5390)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4900 robust_rms=9.208 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.894 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4900 robust_rms=0.509 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.545 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4900 robust_rms=0.359 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.430 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4900 robust_rms_before=0.933 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.294 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.359 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.332 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.430
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.332 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.338 n_q1=1350 n_q2=1279 n_q3=1259 n_q4=1012 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.122
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dRsONMHhd9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=839, bad_region=20, passed=26058
Got 26058 stars (including 25161 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26058 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Excluding outliers - 4894 stars left (next iteration limit 5383)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4894 robust_rms=9.283 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.769 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4894 robust_rms=0.444 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.468 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4894 robust_rms=0.344 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.425 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4894 robust_rms_before=0.892 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.302 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.344 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.340 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.425
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.340 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits N_match=4894 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.329 n_q1=1353 n_q2=1274 n_q3=1256 n_q4=1011 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.064
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:28:06.26 +66:12:57.4:  13.87 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:35:53.62 +61:33:08.0:  13.35 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:28:06.26 +66:12:57.4:  13.82 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.84 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:28:06.26 +66:12:57.4: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1366 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:35:53.62 +61:33:08.0:  13.35 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.35 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:35:53.62 +61:33:08.0: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4403 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:45:44.44 +61:47:31.4:  14.01 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 11:56:12.73 +61:00:05.2:  13.91 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:45:44.44 +61:47:31.4:  13.97 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.99 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:45:44.44 +61:47:31.4: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0581 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:25:58.75 +62:11:15.6:  14.25 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 11:56:12.73 +61:00:05.2:  13.91 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.91 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:56:12.73 +61:00:05.2: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8846 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:25:58.75 +62:11:15.6:  14.26 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.25 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:25:58.75 +62:11:15.6: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2005 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 11:06:52.54 +65:04:57.5:  16.05 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:04:36.71 +63:11:02.6:  14.56 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:45:54.55 +60:20:52.5:  16.02 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 11:06:52.54 +65:04:57.5:  16.04 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:31:57.01 +63:39:00.1:  14.75 +/- 0.10  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:04:36.71 +63:11:02.6:  14.43 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.49 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:04:36.71 +63:11:02.6: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5028 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:45:54.55 +60:20:52.5:  16.03 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:31:57.01 +63:39:00.1:  15.09 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.87 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:31:57.01 +63:39:00.1: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8222 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54558.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54709.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 20s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52582_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 52582_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 17.17539    2461269.67539    14.21    12:28:06.22 +66:12:57.7   3266 0460   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.08    12:28:06.30 +66:12:57.1   3267 0460   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52592_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 52592_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.87    12:18:38.45 +63:15:52.7   3601 2317   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

**** FOUND  12:18:38.47 +63:15:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52593_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 52593_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.37    11:52:54.79 +60:20:33.7   5273 4219   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

**** FOUND  11:52:54.85 +60:20:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52598_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 52598_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    12.02    12:18:15.30 +64:05:30.0   3692 1826   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

**** FOUND  12:18:15.33 +64:05:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52699_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 52699_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    10.67    12:13:29.27 +60:01:37.4   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52765_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 52765_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    11.27    12:09:36.76 +64:10:49.3   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52779_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 52779_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    11.33    12:21:23.36 +59:25:52.2   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52819_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 52819_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    11.71    12:55:42.56 +62:52:39.4   1063 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52831_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 52831_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    11.78    12:45:42.82 +64:54:50.0   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52836_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 52836_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    11.63    12:15:42.40 +57:00:10.8   3334 6095   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

**** FOUND  12:15:42.38 +57:00:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52865_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 52865_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    11.86    11:47:15.61 +64:31:48.7   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52882_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 52882_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    11.79    11:51:31.14 +58:21:19.0   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52966_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 52966_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    12.15    11:51:05.30 +66:56:07.1   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53006_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53006_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    12.22    11:45:01.41 +64:47:35.9   5873 1550   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

**** FOUND  11:45:01.41 +64:47:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53017_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53017_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    12.14    11:23:20.34 +61:45:57.6   7411 3314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53146_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53146_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    12.63    12:15:28.48 +56:59:09.0   3352 6108   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

**** FOUND  12:15:28.45 +56:59:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53165_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53165_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    12.53    11:15:37.80 +60:51:31.2   8022 3807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53185_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53185_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    12.67    11:55:57.37 +59:09:35.3   5014 4923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53275_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53275_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.03    12:39:36.14 +57:30:52.3   1452 5473   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53324_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53324_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.25    12:55:30.30 +62:03:30.3   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53339_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53339_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    12.81    11:04:04.13 +61:47:51.1   8786 3133   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

**** FOUND  11:04:04.14 +61:47:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53422_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53422_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.02    11:09:13.35 +64:38:47.9   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53428_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53428_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.53    12:50:42.27 +62:58:08.6   1414 2064   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

**** FOUND  12:50:42.33 +62:58:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53463_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53463_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.45    12:43:29.40 +65:57:22.6   2309 0422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

**** FOUND  12:43:29.41 +65:57:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53503_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53503_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 17.17539    2461269.67539    13.47    12:35:53.63 +61:33:08.4   2238 3135   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.41    12:35:53.62 +61:33:07.6   2239 3135   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53504_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53504_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.50    12:56:03.60 +58:11:03.9   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53509_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53509_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.57    12:55:57.36 +58:40:23.1   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53514_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53514_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.45    12:50:09.69 +64:45:15.9   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53524_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53524_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.55    11:59:19.61 +64:49:28.4   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53538_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53538_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.67    13:02:32.74 +64:24:47.5   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53539_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53539_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.44    12:47:42.56 +57:19:19.7   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53543_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53543_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.64    12:39:26.79 +61:47:30.6   2019 2941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53561_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53561_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.25    12:11:30.68 +58:54:38.5   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53630_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53630_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.53    13:04:05.93 +65:43:34.2   1029 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53631_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53631_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.60    12:58:45.78 +58:56:07.1   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53641_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53641_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.50    11:58:21.25 +61:26:10.9   4906 3544   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

**** FOUND  11:58:21.22 +61:26:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53648_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53648_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.73    12:58:26.51 +59:48:51.1   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53649_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53649_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.80    13:05:40.95 +62:17:29.0   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53691_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53691_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.63    12:28:31.85 +65:44:44.0   3193 0737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53707_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53707_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.75    12:48:13.89 +61:45:49.6   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53722_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53722_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.87    10:56:57.16 +63:01:44.0   9160 2311   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53764_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53764_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.29    11:21:37.04 +57:04:13.0   7781 6141   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

**** FOUND  11:21:36.91 +57:04:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53775_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53775_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.59    12:55:23.67 +60:45:13.6   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53814_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53814_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.81    12:50:11.62 +66:00:35.2   1913 0287   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53838_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53838_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.87    11:20:34.76 +64:40:26.4   7451 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53898_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53898_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 17.17539    2461269.67539    14.01    12:45:44.49 +61:47:31.5   1577 2840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.12    12:45:44.39 +61:47:31.3   1578 2840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53899_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53899_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.87    12:08:26.82 +65:20:00.0   4404 1153   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

**** FOUND  12:08:26.85 +65:20:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53956_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53956_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.12    13:01:16.18 +63:55:18.8   0877 1308   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53958_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53958_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.02    12:34:14.19 +57:25:10.5   1871 5615   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53976_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53976_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.86    12:54:14.28 +62:31:41.1   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53987_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 53987_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.04    13:02:08.48 +60:27:44.2   0193 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54058_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54058_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.02    12:37:40.67 +57:08:31.8   1559 5727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54070_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54070_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.78    11:52:37.16 +58:06:28.1   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54123_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54123_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.14    12:22:11.47 +61:36:53.7   3216 3266   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

**** FOUND  12:22:11.57 +61:36:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54134_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54134_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.66    11:00:09.91 +61:22:32.6   9109 3340   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54189_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54189_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.75    11:02:12.78 +60:08:51.3   9081 4101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54193_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54193_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.56    12:49:47.92 +58:41:39.0   0819 4590   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54211_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54211_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 17.17539    2461269.67539    13.94    11:56:12.65 +61:00:04.2   5046 3814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.85    11:56:12.81 +61:00:06.2   5047 3813   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54240_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54240_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.89    11:11:42.40 +64:17:09.0   8054 1715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54246_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54246_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.18    12:57:58.07 +64:25:02.5   1175 1084   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54257_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54257_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 17.17539    2461269.67539    14.18    12:25:58.52 +62:11:15.0   3003 2885   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.22    12:25:58.98 +62:11:16.2   3003 2884   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54292_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54292_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.16    12:23:45.06 +60:55:07.9   3042 3664   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

**** FOUND  12:23:44.96 +60:55:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54318_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54318_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.95    11:35:38.25 +62:38:16.2   6516 2839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

**** FOUND  11:35:38.58 +62:38:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54406_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54406_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.24    11:07:48.84 +56:56:22.0   8934 6101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54407_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54407_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.09    12:18:33.82 +57:43:13.4   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54412_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54412_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.47    12:13:53.78 +62:47:47.9   3887 2637   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54415_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54415_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.98    11:46:30.10 +61:30:37.8   5757 3527   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

**** FOUND  11:46:30.06 +61:30:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54421_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54421_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.89    11:48:26.73 +66:53:50.7   5676 0274   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54450_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54450_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.06    11:21:21.83 +64:17:43.7   7420 1780   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54457_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54457_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.16    12:24:39.97 +62:30:24.4   3125 2709   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

**** FOUND  12:24:39.73 +62:30:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54537_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54537_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.21    13:03:21.92 +63:45:12.7   0711 1363   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54548_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54548_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.30    12:16:25.16 +57:20:41.9   3302 5882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54550_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54550_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.19    12:37:05.04 +58:30:53.1   1779 4918   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54558_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
Preparing report for the candidate 54558_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54563_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54563_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.84    11:14:26.52 +60:03:30.0   8165 4279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54585_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54585_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.22    12:47:18.74 +56:55:52.2   0747 5682   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54598_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54598_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.77    13:01:40.42 +65:21:08.8   1108 0468   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54610_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54610_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.40    12:41:59.67 +59:05:41.6   1476 4494   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54626_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54626_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    13.92    11:44:45.14 +59:18:52.3   5879 4851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54638_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54638_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.52    11:15:07.87 +65:38:00.8   7740 0931   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54650_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54650_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.83    12:44:17.38 +60:19:51.0   1475 3725   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54668_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54668_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.19    11:22:27.07 +65:19:07.6   7298 1169   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54684_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54684_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.77    12:34:14.06 +58:13:42.7   1967 5132   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54686_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54686_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 17.17539    2461269.67539    14.50    12:04:36.92 +63:11:02.7   4540 2467   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.50    12:04:36.49 +63:11:02.5   4541 2466   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54709_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
Preparing report for the candidate 54709_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54712_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54712_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.24    11:31:23.38 +62:52:33.7   6804 2683   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54715_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54715_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.56    12:19:16.42 +60:58:51.7   3371 3674   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54751_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54751_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.71    12:36:35.24 +60:38:28.1   2079 3664   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54757_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54757_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.54    12:34:12.98 +64:06:54.1   2656 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54766_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54766_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.54    12:18:58.01 +64:11:08.4   3653 1764   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

**** FOUND  12:18:57.71 +64:11:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54768_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54768_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.16    11:13:52.18 +60:35:06.8   8171 3957   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54770_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54770_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 17.17539    2461269.67539    14.75    12:31:57.15 +63:39:00.0   2750 1945   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-12-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.94    12:31:56.87 +63:39:00.3   2752 1945   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54776_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54776_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.78    12:06:22.80 +60:42:21.5   4292 3942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54822_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54822_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.82    12:34:35.74 +59:34:19.4   2098 4327   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54830_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54830_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.82    11:52:13.06 +60:14:30.1   5323 4282   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54831_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 54831_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    14.51    12:13:18.84 +62:00:29.7   3873 3113   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07651_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 07651_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    7.74    12:36:23.21 +59:29:13.4   1953 4351   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

**** FOUND  12:36:23.23 +59:29:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26862_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 26862_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 17.17589    2461269.67589    12.96    11:58:43.30 +63:21:14.0   4945 2391   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_231404_TTUQ1b1x1_4154123_FuCgsFTo/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_23-13-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits

**** FOUND  11:58:43.27 +63:21:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 22s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
11:06:52.54 +65:04:57.5
12:45:54.55 +60:20:52.5
########### Completed UMa-04-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
11:06:52.54 +65:04:57.5
12:45:54.55 +60:20:52.5
###################################################################################
11:06:52.54 +65:04:57.5  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
12:45:54.55 +60:20:52.5  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
11:06:52.54 +65:04:57.5  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
12:45:54.55 +60:20:52.5  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
11:06:52.54 +65:04:57.5  -- not a known variable star
12:45:54.55 +60:20:52.5  -- not a known variable star
Found 2 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
2 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO   ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
11:06:52.54 +65:04:57.5
12:45:54.55 +60:20:52.5
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461269.67539310 -observatory V36
09:03:36.41 +18:06:59.2 Mercury (-1.4mag)
12:33:24.14 -05:21:38.7 Venus (-4.4mag)
06:15:07.40 +23:42:23.5 Mars (1.3mag)
08:50:56.55 +18:10:56.0 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:55:32.57 +03:07:24.5 Saturn (0.5mag)
04:12:38.14 +20:59:17.3 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:15:31.29 +00:08:59.9 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:27:18.26 -23:33:28.0 Pluto (14.5mag)
13:05:34.40 -12:14:27.1 Moon (-9.5mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Aug 17 00:02 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461269.67539310:
08:50:57.40 +18:10:52.0 Io (6.1mag)
08:50:49.66 +18:11:28.0 Europa (6.3mag)
08:51:00.50 +18:10:36.2 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:50:48.67 +18:11:29.3 Callisto (6.8mag)
08:48:24.61 +18:15:48.0 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:50:56.70 +18:10:55.7 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:48:01.84 +18:12:35.8 Elara (17.7mag)
08:55:05.26 +17:46:21.4 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:53:31.18 +18:23:15.0 Carme (19.0mag)
00:55:44.48 +03:07:05.3 Titan (8.4mag)
00:55:35.66 +03:07:06.6 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:56:02.64 +03:08:04.3 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:55:47.08 +03:06:54.6 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:54:43.68 +02:59:27.0 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 17 00:03 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461269.67539310:
19:43:55.51 -17:50:42.2 JWST
17:52:35.01 +34:04:49.4 Chandra
21:47:32.95 +52:10:04.6 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 17 00:02 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461269.67539310 -observatory V36
03:23:16.85 +18:04:50.7 17.6mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:00:05.58 -34:32:42.4 14.1mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:01:57.38 -69:15:31.1 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:12:01.86 +33:11:18.8 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
04:08:29.41 +40:58:23.0 17.2mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:31:08.19 +30:49:21.3 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:52:09.35 +26:22:50.9 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:29:52.88 +28:04:24.1 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:34:51.40 +05:18:31.1 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:14:17.49 -12:39:04.2 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
20:59:22.79 +64:52:19.4 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:40:00.15 -13:45:48.5 14.5mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:17:52.77 +31:45:34.9 15.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:05:55.34 +15:33:12.6 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:52:24.35 +43:25:57.2 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:57:16.87 +49:36:20.6 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:22:03.12 -12:54:06.5 15.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:01:45.02 +22:33:27.7 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
10:45:37.56 +20:19:06.8 17.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:03:48.69 +01:43:57.8 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:05:24.18 +76:54:12.0 16.6mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:09:41.83 +46:19:16.0 17.2mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:54:20.08 +09:26:59.6 17.4mag A/2026 E1
22:07:36.22 -30:42:50.0 7.0mag 10P/Tempel
11:34:26.41 -03:58:15.0 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
11:25:54.46 +01:42:43.9 17.4mag 63P/Wild
00:53:00.06 -05:49:58.9 15.4mag 65P/Gunn
05:55:33.50 +20:27:38.1 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:30:01.76 -24:30:13.9 17.6mag 84P/Giclas
03:08:32.76 +14:16:34.0 16.8mag 88P/Howell
08:18:12.00 +26:22:57.5 16.3mag 93P/Lovas
04:32:03.60 +20:22:17.6 17.3mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
06:25:52.17 +29:09:36.9 16.1mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:39:35.86 +25:04:09.3 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley
12:01:48.79 -13:40:24.2 17.2mag 124P/Mrkos
05:49:31.68 +21:06:28.9 16.0mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:43:33.67 +18:25:17.0 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
00:01:21.19 +03:15:16.3 17.5mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:15:06.64 -18:49:27.3 13.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
07:46:36.24 +38:06:11.2 16.0mag 162P/Siding Spring
12:15:39.60 +37:07:20.8 12.0mag 169P/NEAT
02:58:22.79 +09:31:05.4 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
16:46:57.99 -10:45:09.7 17.9mag 235P/LINEAR
20:17:40.93 -52:22:18.5 17.9mag 259P/Garradd
03:48:14.62 +28:50:05.7 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
07:32:08.66 +37:23:31.4 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:13:49.21 +02:08:26.6 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski
09:09:02.23 +17:55:51.3 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.3K Aug 17 00:02 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40  AT2026wdy  2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10  AT2026pvk  2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20  AT2026plb  2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30  SN2026ore  2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30  AT2026oxl  2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20  AT2026ouj  2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20  AT2026ntk  2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.6 15.52
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70  SN 2026obc  2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90  ASASSN-26dr  2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00  ASASSN-26ds  2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.15 15.93
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 17 00:02 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2  PNV J00423868+4115582  2026-06-05.1224  19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7  PNV J19004295-4831017  2026-05-25.0752  14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6  PNV J09552128+6902526  2026-06-13.933  18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0  TCP J19512142+3706400  2026-06-17.2942  16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4  TCP J19570387+3741464  2026-06-18.2638  17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3  PNV J00423204+4110283  2026-06-26.059  16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8  TCP J02191736+2857158  2026-07-12.3549  12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6  PNV J00445643+4157416  2026-07-13.8026  17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0  PNV J00425536+4117270  2026-07-20.1813  17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9  TCP J20354364+6131329  2026-07-20.5443  14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0  TCP J21173148+2225510  2026-07-23.5577  14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8  PNV J00412404+4049028  2026-07-25.0157  18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6  PNV J00430426+4102286  2026-07-26.1512  20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0  TCP J14515140+6613240  2026-07-29.2561  13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2  PNV J00430615+4122082  2026-07-30.0085  19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2  PNV J00413323+4110122  2026-08-02.8913  17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-06.4109  11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8  TCP J22571796+4707418  2026-08-09.3289  14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1  PSN J09133817+7628181  2026-08-09.8037  15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6  PNV J00431729+4126486  2026-08-14.0920  16.8mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 17 00:02 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
20:33:52.488 +03:24:38.01  AT 2026wvw  2026-07-23.32 20.8661
00:41:33.169 +41:10:12.40  AT 2026wvv  2026-08-02.89 17.1
23:45:36.740 -03:05:35.56  AT 2026wvu  2026-07-25.60 21.95
22:40:08.792 -06:25:00.39  AT 2026wvt  2026-07-24.51 21.53
18:01:34.940 +35:37:53.90  AT 2026wvs  2026-07-23.31 21.74
23:25:28.465 -20:01:24.81  AT 2026wvr  2026-07-26.54 20.7
23:40:24.824 -24:40:33.31  AT 2026wvq  2026-07-26.54 20.89
21:22:15.890 -02:33:52.37  AT 2026wvp  2026-07-25.44 21.07
22:10:23.762 +16:20:18.77  AT 2026wvo  2026-07-25.45 21.13
23:06:39.906 +05:33:08.21  AT 2026wvn  2026-07-24.57 21.75
00:44:57.801 +25:20:50.30  AT 2026wvm  2026-07-23.55 21.26
23:50:27.739 -03:51:06.21  AT 2026wvl  2026-07-25.58 20.96
00:25:21.084 +26:42:45.70  AT 2026wvk  2026-07-23.55 20.96
23:37:13.087 -06:14:48.44  AT 2026wvj  2026-07-25.59 22.23
00:43:40.407 -30:43:14.55  AT 2026wvi  2026-07-26.58 20.68
22:42:59.067 -07:40:12.15  AT 2026wvh  2026-07-24.50 21.36
22:23:10.327 -02:22:08.97  AT 2026wvg  2026-07-24.49 20.89
23:23:35.914 +24:11:40.27  AT 2026wvf  2026-07-25.53 20.99
00:20:12.928 +32:15:35.83  AT 2026wve  2026-07-23.54 21.08
02:30:56.254 +12:16:48.09  AT 2026wvd  2026-07-27.60 21.14
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 17 00:02 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Mon Aug 17 00:01:47 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 4s (0.07 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 34s (0.57 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 13s (0.22 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 4s (0.07 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 1s (0.02 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 57s (0.95 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 9 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 2 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 2 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 17s (0.28 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 13s (0.22 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 1s (0.02 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 2s (0.03 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 22s (0.37 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 55s (0.92 min)
FIELD_UMa-04-Q1b1x1: 131s (2.18 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 141s (2.35 min)
Finished: Mon Aug 17 00:04:08 CDT 2026