fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 16.45917 | 2461268.95917 | 13.85 | 09:34:14.10 +65:06:13.7 | 1967 5132 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 16.45968 | 2461268.95968 | 13.85 | 09:34:15.41 +65:06:15.1 | 1967 5132 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits |
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.4594 2461268.9594 13.85 09:34:14.75 +65:06:14.4
148.00594 41.14266 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.4" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | DocumentRef: VOTx442603 | 09:34:14.75 +65:06:14.4 (user input) | (GCVS) | (GCVS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 09:34:14.75 +65:06:14.4: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 09:34:14.75 +65:06:14.4: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5 FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3 ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr) INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: UMa-03-Q1b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting UMa-03-Q1b1x1 ########### Processing UMa-03-Q1b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 822791 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 822791 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits_preview.png'
UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
renamed 'UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits_preview.png'
UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 501.7858 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 543.6529 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2074.6025 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 535.5268 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2146.6566 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 562.9903 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 4.13444 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.049 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-16T06:01:02.5974401' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-16T11:01:02.5974401' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61268.4590578359 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-16T11:01:12.4974622' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61268.4591724188 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 154.284867707762 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 61.9996333408004 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 14.8747222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 23.0891666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.84095227567015 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-03' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 17 09' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29523 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29523 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 62.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 905.99 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 27.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.600288 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/d_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits :) Spent 0.500815 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/d_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-16T06:01:46.1539813' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-16T11:01:46.1539813' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61268.4595619561 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-16T11:01:56.0586164' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61268.4596765973 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 154.284867720403 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 61.9996333789475 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 14.9347222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 23.1538888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.8263246524908 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-03' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 17 09' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29523 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29523 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 62.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 905.99 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 27.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.600288 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/d_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits :) Spent 0.512440 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/d_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461268.95917358 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:17:03.334 +62:00:01.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits Image size: 944.0'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:17:06.224 +62:00:54.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:17:03.334 +62:00:01.20 Second-epoch image center 10:17:06.224 +62:00:54.11 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0157 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Image size: 944.0'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:17:07.794 +62:00:57.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:17:03.334 +62:00:01.20 Second-epoch image center 10:17:07.794 +62:00:57.70 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0180 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 10:17:06.224 +62:00:54.11 Second-epoch second image center 10:17:07.794 +62:00:57.70 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00323 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GwGS97G8nE Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tI1tiqoJBX Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AWmyXaUkDW Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XoTCkhWTpj Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits and wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits and wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits and wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 7662 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 134.1787 to 172.7559 deg, Dec +55.2223 to +67.4795 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 134.1787 to 172.7559 deg, Dec 55.2223 to 67.4795 deg Loaded 7307 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4357 out of 4609 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4609 out of 7662 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.878500 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.878500 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 7662 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 134.1787 to 172.7559 deg, Dec +55.2223 to +67.4795 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 134.1787 to 172.7559 deg, Dec 55.2223 to 67.4795 deg Loaded 7307 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4357 out of 4609 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4609 out of 7662 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits (aperture=6.2) Read 8236 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 134.1789 to 172.7561 deg, Dec +55.2223 to +67.4795 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 134.1789 to 172.7561 deg, Dec 55.2223 to 67.4795 deg Loaded 7307 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4375 out of 4641 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4641 out of 8236 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits (aperture=6.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits 2.2 pix UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits 2.7 pix fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits 2.7 pix fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits 15.4 mag. UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits 13.2 mag. fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits 13.1 mag. fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.1 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.GwGS97G8nE (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=562, bad_region=0, passed=7662 Got 7662 stars (including 7088 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7662 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4908 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7662 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7662 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7662 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4907 stars left (next iteration limit 5398) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits N_match=4907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.316 n_q1=1221 n_q2=1154 n_q3=1266 n_q4=1266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.350 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits -region wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.tI1tiqoJBX (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=598, bad_region=0, passed=8236 Got 8236 stars (including 7627 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8236 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4910 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8236 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8236 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8236 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4910 stars left (next iteration limit 5401) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits N_match=4910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.329 n_q1=1240 n_q2=1151 n_q3=1255 n_q4=1264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.230 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits -region wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.AWmyXaUkDW (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=124, bad_region=0, passed=2500 Got 2500 stars (including 2374 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2500 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013111 (47.2 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010489 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 730 to 788 (Dec 56.1 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2335 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2332 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2331 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2332 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2498 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 730 to 788 (Dec 56.1 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2334 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2331 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2498 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2331 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2498 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Excluding outliers - 2331 stars left (next iteration limit 2565) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2331 robust_rms=8.853 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.147 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2331 robust_rms=0.585 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.900 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2331 robust_rms=0.494 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.623 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2331 robust_rms_before=1.610 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.443 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.494 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.638 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.623 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.638 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits N_match=2331 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.661 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.463 n_q1=647 n_q2=396 n_q3=717 n_q4=571 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.484 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.XoTCkhWTpj (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=114, bad_region=0, passed=2453 Got 2453 stars (including 2335 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2453 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013111 (47.2 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010489 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 730 to 788 (Dec 56.1 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2297 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2294 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2293 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2294 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2450 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 730 to 788 (Dec 56.1 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2296 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2293 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2450 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2293 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2450 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 2293 stars left (next iteration limit 2523) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2293 robust_rms=8.577 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.374 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2293 robust_rms=0.573 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.156 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2293 robust_rms=0.467 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.595 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2293 robust_rms_before=1.644 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.416 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.467 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.556 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.595 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.556 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits N_match=2293 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.609 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.429 n_q1=637 n_q2=386 n_q3=714 n_q4=556 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.405 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits sigma_overall=0.370 worst_q_ratio=1.350 ref2=UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits sigma_overall=0.360 worst_q_ratio=1.230 new1=fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits sigma_overall=0.445 worst_q_ratio=1.484 new2=fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits sigma_overall=0.433 worst_q_ratio=1.405 reference average sigma_overall=0.365 worst_q_ratio=1.29 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305_astrometric_residuals.png (4907 matched stars from wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276_astrometric_residuals.png (4910 matched stars from wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175_astrometric_residuals.png (2331 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176_astrometric_residuals.png (2293 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 04551_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 04551_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks**** FOUND 09:36:44.59 +62:17:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:17:03.334 +62:00:01.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits Image size: 944.0'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:17:06.224 +62:00:54.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:17:03.334 +62:00:01.20 Second-epoch image center 10:17:06.224 +62:00:54.11 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0157 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Image size: 944.0'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:17:07.794 +62:00:57.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:17:03.334 +62:00:01.20 Second-epoch image center 10:17:07.794 +62:00:57.70 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0180 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 10:17:06.224 +62:00:54.11 Second-epoch second image center 10:17:07.794 +62:00:57.70 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00323 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits &> /tmp/tmp.b2wd4tpXB9 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pMXaFUgyF6 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fhx3vfue2M Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LEWW3Qx8rJ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits and wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_ Discovery image 3 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 10.97 09:36:44.61 +62:17:18.2 1953 3420 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits .fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits and wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits and wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 42564 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 134.1787 to 172.8806 deg, Dec +55.2066 to +67.4896 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 134.1787 to 172.8806 deg, Dec 55.2066 to 67.4896 deg Loaded 7342 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4149 out of 4659 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4659 out of 42564 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.764100 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.764100 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 42564 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 134.1787 to 172.8806 deg, Dec +55.2066 to +67.4896 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 134.1787 to 172.8806 deg, Dec 55.2066 to 67.4896 deg Loaded 7342 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4149 out of 4659 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4659 out of 42564 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits (aperture=4.8) Read 43256 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 134.1789 to 172.8802 deg, Dec +55.2070 to +67.4875 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 134.1789 to 172.8802 deg, Dec 55.2070 to 67.4875 deg Loaded 7342 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4110 out of 4664 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4664 out of 43256 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits (aperture=5.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 61 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits 2.0 pix UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits 2.6 pix fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits 2.6 pix fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits 15.6 mag. UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits 13.7 mag. fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits 13.6 mag. fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 13.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.b2wd4tpXB9 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1976, bad_region=7, passed=42549 Got 42549 stars (including 40488 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42549 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4912 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42549 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42549 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42549 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4912 stars left (next iteration limit 5403) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits N_match=4912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.298 n_q1=1201 n_q2=1162 n_q3=1273 n_q4=1276 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.373 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits -region wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.pMXaFUgyF6 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=2194, bad_region=8, passed=43238 Got 43238 stars (including 40957 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43238 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4914 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43238 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43238 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43238 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4914 stars left (next iteration limit 5405) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits N_match=4914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.314 n_q1=1209 n_q2=1154 n_q3=1268 n_q4=1283 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.256 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits -region wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.fhx3vfue2M (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=542, bad_region=16, passed=14624 Got 14624 stars (including 14035 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14624 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013111 (47.2 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010489 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14621 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14621 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14621 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Excluding outliers - 4888 stars left (next iteration limit 5377) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=8.533 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.804 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=0.655 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.988 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=0.555 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.712 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4888 robust_rms_before=1.646 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.486 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.555 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.625 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.712 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.625 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits N_match=4888 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.651 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.488 n_q1=1370 n_q2=752 n_q3=1590 n_q4=1176 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.365 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.LEWW3Qx8rJ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=345, bad_region=15, passed=14131 Got 14131 stars (including 13747 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14131 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013111 (47.2 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010489 (37.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4891 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14128 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14128 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14128 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Excluding outliers - 4889 stars left (next iteration limit 5379) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=8.450 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.886 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=0.657 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.032 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=0.547 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.702 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4889 robust_rms_before=1.669 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.483 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.547 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.632 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.702 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.632 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits N_match=4889 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.665 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.477 n_q1=1374 n_q2=758 n_q3=1579 n_q4=1178 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.373 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 09:49:00.56 +60:05:31.1: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 09:34:14.75 +65:06:14.4: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 09:49:00.56 +60:05:31.1: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:49:00.56 +60:05:31.1: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9787 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-30-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 09:34:14.75 +65:06:14.4: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54535.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 118s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53380_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 53380_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checksRejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53436_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 53436_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 10.31 10:01:57.72 +63:53:43.3 3725 4297 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53451_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 53451_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 11.05 09:27:02.73 +59:49:44.1 1063 2025 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53457_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 53457_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 10.43 11:04:36.00 +58:40:12.1 8582 1727 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53470_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 53470_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 10.75 10:18:08.54 +59:11:31.3 4957 1504 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53520_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 53520_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 11.38 10:10:57.92 +66:30:46.5 4273 5886 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits **** FOUND 09:10:57.40 +63:32:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53530_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 53530_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 11.93 09:10:57.41 +63:32:53.7 0295 4444 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53540_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 53540_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 11.44 09:40:46.04 +58:19:15.9 2026 1004 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53548_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 53548_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 11.80 09:28:47.69 +63:30:19.6 1492 4215 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53549_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 53549_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 11.31 10:09:38.65 +58:50:52.1 4308 1267 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53552_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 53552_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 11.12 10:24:07.69 +57:03:07.3 5520 0248 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53591_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 53591_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 11.64 10:27:56.21 +65:37:56.2 5342 5422 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53598_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 53598_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 11.46 10:15:15.52 +56:54:23.9 4798 0111 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53656_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 53656_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 11.85 09:23:22.42 +56:36:44.4 0477 0121 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53669_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 53669_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 11.78 10:28:20.79 +59:25:38.7 5727 1708 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53732_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 53732_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 11.44 11:08:33.37 +57:08:28.4 9118 0903 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53747_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 53747_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 11.87 11:03:47.64 +62:14:04.7 8022 3807 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53761_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 53761_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 12.30 09:24:31.92 +60:35:16.0 0941 2507 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53806_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 53806_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 12.87 09:09:43.79 +63:13:01.0 0171 4264 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53807_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 53807_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 12.00 11:21:01.43 +62:42:40.6 9120 4411 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53816_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 53816_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 12.76 09:09:21.48 +64:02:43.0 0250 4763 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53827_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 53827_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 12.81 09:15:08.97 +65:18:33.2 0774 5442 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53849_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 53849_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 12.75 09:11:31.00 +63:37:03.5 0341 4478 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53873_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 53873_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 12.38 10:02:13.77 +58:40:37.6 3730 1155 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53885_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 53885_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 12.57 09:36:57.80 +58:18:55.1 1723 1026 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53925_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 53925_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 13.14 09:27:09.76 +60:13:00.5 1105 2257 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53946_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 53946_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 12.71 10:03:06.67 +65:01:59.2 3801 4983 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53951_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 53951_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 13.04 09:13:38.32 +62:27:26.2 0349 3757 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53952_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 53952_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 12.99 09:25:33.51 +65:32:56.2 1452 5473 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53956_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 53956_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 13.04 09:16:46.46 +59:51:22.6 0284 2160 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53970_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 53970_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 12.68 09:29:43.30 +56:51:27.3 1029 0203 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53971_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 53971_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 12.26 11:17:31.39 +61:15:30.2 9133 3495 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54002_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 54002_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 12.90 09:20:05.76 +61:46:47.3 0732 3271 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54005_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 54005_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 13.14 09:52:37.87 +66:05:10.5 3159 5634 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54066_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 54066_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 12.35 11:13:34.36 +59:21:57.4 9160 2311 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 16.45917 2461268.95917 12.88 09:49:00.49 +60:05:30.6 2743 2033 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54070_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 54070_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 13.14 09:49:00.64 +60:05:31.6 2741 2033 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits **** FOUND 11:04:04.25 +61:47:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54120_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 54120_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 12.52 11:04:04.22 +61:47:48.9 8102 3555 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54182_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 54182_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 13.08 09:30:04.84 +61:11:24.2 1400 2814 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54210_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 54210_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 12.87 11:19:13.38 +62:14:29.3 9081 4101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54229_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 54229_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 12.97 10:26:40.63 +65:53:20.0 5250 5569 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54283_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 54283_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 12.93 09:55:32.76 +57:58:38.0 3193 0737 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54319_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 54319_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 13.60 09:26:40.54 +65:59:16.6 1559 5727 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54351_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 54351_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 13.49 09:31:52.66 +65:52:31.4 1871 5615 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54355_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 54355_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 12.80 11:26:02.05 +65:27:03.1 8934 6101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54410_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 54410_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 13.99 09:14:02.35 +65:41:13.0 0747 5682 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54464_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 54464_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 13.37 09:26:00.30 +58:37:13.7 0877 1308 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54477_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 54477_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 12.91 11:16:37.35 +61:01:19.5 9109 3339 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54488_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 54488_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 13.19 10:35:22.25 +64:35:28.0 5879 4851 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54491_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 54491_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 13.20 11:14:31.30 +65:22:57.3 8243 5837 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54499_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 54499_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 13.65 09:18:07.45 +63:56:44.2 0819 4590 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54516_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 54516_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 12.95 11:07:22.36 +62:56:08.5 8165 4279 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54518_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 54518_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 12.87 10:50:06.07 +58:45:49.7 7451 1547 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54525_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 54525_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 13.81 10:44:11.11 +66:40:22.8 6247 6179 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54532_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 54532_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 13.69 09:54:50.35 +66:30:12.9 3302 5882 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54535_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 Preparing report for the candidate 54535_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 11034_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 11034_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 12.90 10:26:32.95 +59:20:09.8 5595 1640 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits **** FOUND 10:36:17.30 +59:56:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 10376_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 10376_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 11.23 10:36:17.29 +59:56:09.8 6292 2081 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22143_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 22143_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 12.57 09:26:38.92 +58:07:00.8 0884 0997 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 08177_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 08177_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 12.99 09:38:19.66 +61:30:32.0 2019 2941 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits **** FOUND 10:51:23.23 +59:19:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 17503_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 17503_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 6.62 10:51:23.24 +59:19:12.1 7489 1895 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits **** FOUND 11:03:42.52 +61:44:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 00227_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 The candidate 00227_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 6.43 11:03:42.46 +61:44:59.7 8084 3521 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits **** FOUND 10:35:09.79 +57:04:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 119s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 09:34:14.75 +65:06:14.4 ########### Completed UMa-03-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 09:34:14.75 +65:06:14.4 ################################################################################### 09:34:14.75 +65:06:14.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' 09:34:14.75 +65:06:14.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) 09:34:14.75 +65:06:14.4 -- not a known variable star Found 1 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 09:34:14.75 +65:06:14.4 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461268.95917358 -observatory V36 08:57:53.20 +18:25:27.5 Mercury (-1.4mag) 12:31:02.35 -05:01:14.4 Venus (-4.4mag) 06:13:04.55 +23:42:30.2 Mars (1.3mag) 08:50:18.61 +18:13:23.5 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:55:37.78 +03:08:09.1 Saturn (0.6mag) 04:12:34.42 +20:59:07.9 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:15:34.32 +00:09:21.4 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:27:22.13 -23:33:13.1 Pluto (14.5mag) 12:36:00.79 -07:59:57.7 Moon (-9.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Aug 16 06:04 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461268.95917358: 08:50:23.93 +18:13:01.1 Io (6.1mag) 08:50:22.71 +18:13:05.6 Europa (6.3mag) 08:50:31.17 +18:12:25.4 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:50:17.98 +18:13:24.2 Callisto (6.8mag) 08:47:46.84 +18:17:49.2 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:50:17.68 +18:13:28.0 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:47:23.71 +18:14:45.0 Elara (17.7mag) 08:54:27.34 +17:49:07.6 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:52:56.17 +18:25:32.3 Carme (19.0mag) 00:55:48.46 +03:07:42.8 Titan (8.4mag) 00:55:35.79 +03:07:52.0 Rhea (9.7mag) 00:56:06.64 +03:08:39.6 Iapetus (11.1mag) 00:55:50.82 +03:07:34.3 Hyperion (14.4mag) 00:54:49.77 +03:00:16.9 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 16 06:04 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461268.95917358: 19:39:11.36 -18:15:05.1 JWST 16:26:00.75 +45:51:28.8 Chandra 12:10:32.14 -61:49:22.5 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 16 06:04 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461268.95917358 -observatory V36 03:22:33.43 +18:01:43.4 17.6mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:00:09.69 -34:33:11.1 14.1mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:01:19.09 -69:13:41.3 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:11:52.08 +33:10:21.2 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 04:06:38.77 +40:45:22.1 17.2mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:31:44.47 +30:52:45.7 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:51:29.09 +26:23:39.3 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:29:12.99 +28:06:16.1 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:34:22.82 +05:18:33.1 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:14:07.21 -12:37:13.8 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:00:14.21 +64:58:29.7 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 15:40:32.72 -13:41:52.3 14.5mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:17:07.34 +31:43:33.0 15.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:05:58.46 +15:33:33.7 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:53:12.67 +43:24:59.4 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:58:21.89 +49:35:08.6 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:21:31.35 -12:54:15.4 15.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:01:20.24 +22:41:16.0 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 10:44:35.30 +20:22:02.2 17.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:03:20.04 +01:47:02.1 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:04:54.58 +76:58:57.7 16.6mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:09:36.19 +46:18:53.6 17.2mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:53:43.27 +09:22:53.8 17.4mag A/2026 E1 22:06:52.57 -30:28:10.5 7.0mag 10P/Tempel 11:33:59.63 -03:55:24.4 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 11:24:27.50 +01:56:45.8 17.3mag 63P/Wild 00:53:08.95 -05:47:54.2 15.4mag 65P/Gunn 05:53:59.28 +20:29:12.1 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 20:30:37.84 -24:25:49.1 17.6mag 84P/Giclas 03:08:00.23 +14:14:10.1 16.8mag 88P/Howell 08:16:28.17 +26:29:24.2 16.3mag 93P/Lovas 04:29:57.16 +20:05:26.5 17.4mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 06:23:32.74 +29:16:08.8 16.2mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 09:37:55.63 +25:12:02.9 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley 12:00:21.12 -13:24:13.9 17.2mag 124P/Mrkos 05:48:30.89 +21:07:01.9 16.0mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 06:42:23.14 +18:27:49.1 17.9mag 131P/Mueller 00:01:33.47 +03:16:19.8 17.5mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 03:15:42.04 -18:51:08.0 13.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 07:44:13.35 +38:05:34.0 16.0mag 162P/Siding Spring 12:28:08.07 +37:59:04.1 12.0mag 169P/NEAT 02:57:13.94 +09:31:42.7 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:46:28.77 -10:41:55.0 17.9mag 235P/LINEAR 20:17:55.98 -52:25:56.0 17.9mag 259P/Garradd 03:46:09.45 +28:33:11.4 15.3mag 260P/McNaught 07:30:02.00 +37:25:41.3 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:13:31.08 +02:13:16.9 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski 09:08:23.41 +17:58:01.5 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.3K Aug 16 06:04 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 16 06:04 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 16 06:04 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 02:30:56.254 +12:16:48.09 AT 2026wvd 2026-07-27.60 21.14 23:59:25.294 -07:31:37.07 AT 2026wvc 2026-07-25.58 21.69 23:46:10.397 -04:40:52.18 AT 2026wvb 2026-07-25.58 21.93 23:42:58.275 -02:31:01.83 AT 2026wva 2026-07-25.59 22.09 23:37:50.618 -01:46:17.45 AT 2026wuz 2026-07-25.58 20.15 00:30:26.145 +29:31:04.56 AT 2026wuy 2026-07-23.54 21.23 23:43:45.878 +27:53:57.40 AT 2026wux 2026-07-27.51 20.99 17:05:21.182 +29:02:19.42 AT 2026wuw 2026-03-09.61 21.2 16:00:25.159 +52:39:29.32 AT 2026wuv 2026-05-24.44 21 15:12:38.490 +17:08:40.32 AT 2026wuu 2026-07-06.38 20.78 20:34:48.010 -30:46:06.82 AT 2026wut 2026-07-08.49 20.87 13:24:16.058 -23:32:48.97 AT 2026wus 2026-05-21.31 20.5 15:52:09.810 +21:23:36.58 AT 2026wur 2026-05-19.33 21.14 17:21:27.821 +31:45:59.75 AT 2026wuq 2026-07-24.44 20.99 16:06:39.962 -00:03:48.96 AT 2026wup 2026-07-08.37 20.6 23:36:31.132 -01:42:30.56 AT 2026wuo 2026-07-25.58 21.53 14:58:54.953 +20:56:59.36 AT 2026wun 2026-06-12.38 21.33 13:29:54.424 -08:02:17.84 AT 2026wum 2026-05-12.34 21.76 15:31:56.171 -23:07:56.50 AT 2026wul 2026-07-16.29 21.12 15:50:35.869 +16:13:29.04 AT 2026wuk 2026-06-08.46 20.66 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 16 06:04 tns_transients_list.txt Discovery image 3 2026 08 16.45968 2461268.95968 6.47 10:35:09.78 +57:04:59.2 6419 0360 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_060232_TTUQ1b1x1_4005992_SHOE1wbe/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-01-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0176.fits
