This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.4581 2461268.9581 10.68 06:37:37.04 +04:35:34.8
207.26907 -0.97126 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 10.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASAS J063737+0435.5
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.820 V Y 0.250 V 2452525.40000 55.060000000000 M5
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:37:37.04 +04:35:34.8: 11.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:37:37.04 +04:35:34.8: 11.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.59 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J063737+0435.5,2461268.9581,10.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J063737+0435.5 20260816.4581 10.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.4581 2461268.9581 12.37 07:09:42.92 +01:53:09.9
213.33534 4.92609 galactic CMi Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.7" and 10.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J0709436+015255
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.680 g Y 1.450 g 2459202.33700 347.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 07:09:42.92 +01:53:09.9: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 07:09:42.92 +01:53:09.9: 13.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0709436+015255,2461268.9581,12.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0709436+015255 20260816.4581 12.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.4581 2461268.9581 12.15 06:46:24.66 +04:22:48.9
208.46095 0.88029 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 10.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS 12523873
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.420 R1 Y 0.180 R1
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:46:24.66 +04:22:48.9: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:46:24.66 +04:22:48.9: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 12523873,2461268.9581,12.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 12523873 20260816.4581 12.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.4581 2461268.9581 12.51 06:50:17.74 +02:13:23.3
210.82307 0.75953 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 10.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS 12529703
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.300 r Y 0.353 r 2458574.10370 221.268096600000 S
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:50:17.74 +02:13:23.3: 13.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:50:17.74 +02:13:23.3: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 12529703,2461268.9581,12.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 12529703 20260816.4581 12.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.4581 2461268.9581 12.15 06:53:55.52 +05:16:32.0
208.51548 2.95457 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 10.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J065356+0516.5
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.174 Ic Y 0.497 Ic 2452823.00000 247.000000000000 M8
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:53:55.52 +05:16:32.0: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:53:55.52 +05:16:32.0: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J065356+0516.5,2461268.9581,12.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J065356+0516.5 20260816.4581 12.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.4581 2461268.9581 12.04 06:39:19.73 +01:05:25.5
210.57964 -2.19585 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 10.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS 12513129
Type: LB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.500 V 14.500 V M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:39:19.73 +01:05:25.5: 13.10 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:39:19.73 +01:05:25.5: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 12513129,2461268.9581,12.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 12513129 20260816.4581 12.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.4581 2461268.9581 11.92 06:56:48.13 +05:00:31.0
209.07913 3.47192 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 10.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J065648+0500.5
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.320 V Y 0.760 V 2453208.90000 266.693966000000 M8
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:56:48.13 +05:00:31.0: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:56:48.13 +05:00:31.0: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J065648+0500.5,2461268.9581,11.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J065648+0500.5 20260816.4581 11.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.4581 2461268.9581 11.80 07:00:12.16 +02:39:10.9
211.56723 3.15847 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 10.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J105.0503+02.6530 | 07:00:12.06 +02:39:11.2 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=1.441+/-0.032 (Very red! L if it's a dwarf)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 07:00:12.16 +02:39:10.9: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 07:00:12.16 +02:39:10.9: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J105.0503+02.6530,2461268.9581,11.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J105.0503+02.6530 20260816.4581 11.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.4581 2461268.9581 11.60 06:43:56.41 +01:44:59.5
210.51965 -0.86940 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 10.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J064356+0145.0
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.800 V Y 0.530 V 2452034.00000 80.200000000000 M6:
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:43:56.41 +01:44:59.5: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:43:56.41 +01:44:59.5: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J064356+0145.0,2461268.9581,11.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J064356+0145.0 20260816.4581 11.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.4581 2461268.9581 12.83 06:36:36.99 +01:10:33.3
210.19317 -2.75964 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 10.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS 12509173
Type: LPV
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.350 R1 Y 0.160 R1 89.880000000000
The object was found in astcheck.3451 Mentor -374 -274 463 16.6 -0 0
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the predicted asteroid brightness, but the matched variable star above likely accounts for this object.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:36:36.99 +01:10:33.3: 13.91 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:36:36.99 +01:10:33.3: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 12509173,2461268.9581,12.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 12509173 20260816.4581 12.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.4581 2461268.9581 11.16 07:02:59.44 +01:09:54.3
213.21163 3.10157 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 10.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V0529 Mon
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.420 V Y 0.670 V 2452396.30000 290.000000000000 : M6-M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 07:02:59.44 +01:09:54.3: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 07:02:59.44 +01:09:54.3: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0529 Mon,2461268.9581,11.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0529 Mon 20260816.4581 11.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.4581 2461268.9581 12.77 06:47:40.68 +08:06:36.2
205.28163 2.85874 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 10.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J064740.63+080636.7
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.630 V 14.240 V 2458391.98090 346.143587100000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:47:40.68 +08:06:36.2: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:47:40.68 +08:06:36.2: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J064740.63+080636.7,2461268.9581,12.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J064740.63+080636.7 20260816.4581 12.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.4581 2461268.9581 11.05 07:10:23.19 +06:29:11.3
209.28431 7.15423 galactic CMi Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 10.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" DF CMi
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.500 V 14.100 V 2452583.30000 137.900000000000 M4
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 07:10:23.19 +06:29:11.3: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 07:10:23.19 +06:29:11.3: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DF CMi,2461268.9581,11.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DF CMi 20260816.4581 11.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.4581 2461268.9581 10.97 06:56:45.38 +01:03:55.9
212.58964 1.66909 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 10.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASAS J065645+0103.9
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.450 V Y 0.480 V 2451978.50000 65.310000000000 M5
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:56:45.38 +01:03:55.9: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:56:45.38 +01:03:55.9: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J065645+0103.9,2461268.9581,10.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J065645+0103.9 20260816.4581 10.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.4581 2461268.9581 12.82 06:32:58.59 +03:43:59.0
207.50124 -2.39415 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 10.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J063258.46+034358.7
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.730 g Y 0.620 g 2458767.79500 69.080000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:32:58.59 +03:43:59.0: 13.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:32:58.59 +03:43:59.0: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J063258.46+034358.7,2461268.9581,12.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J063258.46+034358.7 20260816.4581 12.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.63247990 11.02.2026 03:10:36.263 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
First image: 2461082.63247990 11.02.2026 03:10:36.263 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Last image: 2461268.95854340 16.08.2026 11:00:08.150 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.85
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 30886
Objects passed selection criteria: 30727
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 20499
Average stars matched: 19846.2 (96.8157 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 254656 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 16 06:01:59 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.63247990 11.02.2026 03:10:36.263 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
First image: 2461082.63247990 11.02.2026 03:10:36.263 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Last image: 2461268.95854340 16.08.2026 11:00:08.150 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 160
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 39 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 211186
Objects passed selection criteria: 210563
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 147937
Average stars matched: 142324 (96.2062 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 668976 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 16 06:03:21 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461268.95757545
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:20.491 +05:59:15.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Image size: 944.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:24.598 +06:01:42.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:20.491 +05:59:15.99
Second-epoch image center 06:51:24.598 +06:01:42.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0441 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Image size: 944.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:27.703 +06:02:24.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:20.491 +05:59:15.99
Second-epoch image center 06:51:27.703 +06:02:24.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0604 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:51:24.598 +06:01:42.50
Second-epoch second image center 06:51:27.703 +06:02:24.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01745 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Kg3XQG7jeI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0yXVdFEG3r
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5jB7MOePy2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2gAqN9bj3H
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits and wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits and wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits and wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits) and catalog (wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 32961 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 94.7452 to 110.7708 deg, Dec +0.5814 to +11.3123 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 94.7452 to 110.7708 deg, Dec 0.5814 to 11.3123 deg
Loaded 21773 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 15914 out of 17914 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17914 out of 32961 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.900400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.900400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.85
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.05
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.05
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 32961 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 94.7452 to 110.7708 deg, Dec +0.5814 to +11.3123 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 94.7452 to 110.7708 deg, Dec 0.5814 to 11.3123 deg
Loaded 21773 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 15914 out of 17914 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17914 out of 32961 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 33181 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 94.7699 to 110.7820 deg, Dec +0.5785 to +11.3189 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 94.7699 to 110.7820 deg, Dec 0.5785 to 11.3189 deg
Loaded 21790 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 15930 out of 17931 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17931 out of 33181 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 9 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
2.2 pix Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
2.6 pix fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
2.6 pix fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
15.0 mag. Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.3 (SNR ) 10.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.Kg3XQG7jeI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3983, bad_region=0, passed=32961
Got 32961 stars (including 28949 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32961 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4825 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4825 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4822 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4822 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4822 stars left (next iteration limit 5307)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits N_match=4822 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.440 n_q1=1130 n_q2=1265 n_q3=1194 n_q4=1233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.051
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits -region wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0yXVdFEG3r (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=4007, bad_region=0, passed=33181
Got 33181 stars (including 29126 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33181 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4825 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4825 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4825 stars left (next iteration limit 5306)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits N_match=4825 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.435 n_q1=1140 n_q2=1262 n_q3=1192 n_q4=1231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.093
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -region wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5jB7MOePy2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=418, bad_region=0, passed=8343
Got 8343 stars (including 7916 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8343 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013121 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010497 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4756 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4756 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8342 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8342 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8342 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 4760 stars left (next iteration limit 5231)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4760 robust_rms=7.550 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.166 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4760 robust_rms=0.546 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.004 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4760 robust_rms=0.420 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.591 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4760 robust_rms_before=1.365 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.553 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.420 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.665 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.591
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:24.682 +06:01:41.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 8343 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3973245.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.365 -> 0.420 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits N_match=4760 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.626 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.511 n_q1=1375 n_q2=799 n_q3=1552 n_q4=1034 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.412
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2gAqN9bj3H (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=408, bad_region=0, passed=7983
Got 7983 stars (including 7567 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7983 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013118 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010494 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4754 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4758 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4753 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4758 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4758 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 4758 stars left (next iteration limit 5228)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4758 robust_rms=7.632 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.287 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4758 robust_rms=0.584 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.003 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4758 robust_rms=0.431 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.594 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4758 robust_rms_before=1.287 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.506 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.431 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.639 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.594
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.639 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits N_match=4758 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.679 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.519 n_q1=1385 n_q2=827 n_q3=1523 n_q4=1023 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.339
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits sigma_overall=0.492 worst_q_ratio=1.051
ref2=Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits sigma_overall=0.471 worst_q_ratio=1.093
new1=fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits sigma_overall=0.443 worst_q_ratio=1.412
new2=fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits sigma_overall=0.507 worst_q_ratio=1.339
reference average sigma_overall=0.4815 worst_q_ratio=1.072
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054_astrometric_residuals.png (4822 matched stars from wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055_astrometric_residuals.png (4825 matched stars from wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173_astrometric_residuals.png (4760 matched stars from wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174_astrometric_residuals.png (4758 matched stars from wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.49 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Mon-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:37:37.04 +04:35:34.8: 11.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:37:37.04 +04:35:34.8: 11.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:37:37.04 +04:35:34.8: ref_mag=11.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.6759 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out12116.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52494_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 52494_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:08.58 +10:45:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52521_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 52521_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:48.55 +02:43:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52524_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 52524_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:15.74 +08:02:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08167_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 08167_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:45.16 +03:18:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10287_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 10287_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:41.13 +04:04:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00999_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 00999_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:31.35 +01:05:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26218_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 26218_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:05.51 +09:02:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12116_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
Preparing report for the candidate 12116_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31132_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 31132_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:42.59 +10:01:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Mon-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
06:37:37.04 +04:35:34.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:20.491 +05:59:15.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:24.682 +06:01:41.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:20.491 +05:59:15.99
Second-epoch image center 06:51:24.682 +06:01:41.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0439 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Image size: 944.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:27.703 +06:02:24.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:20.491 +05:59:15.99
Second-epoch image center 06:51:27.703 +06:02:24.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0604 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:51:24.682 +06:01:41.18
Second-epoch second image center 06:51:27.703 +06:02:24.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01745 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dWFZV56Jwg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AUpBfmYwi7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qJFeFkB4lX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ecCKuItRha
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits and wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits and wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits and wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits) and catalog (wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 231384 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 94.7452 to 110.7733 deg, Dec +0.5711 to +11.3153 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 94.7452 to 110.7733 deg, Dec 0.5711 to 11.3153 deg
Loaded 21806 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11920 out of 19090 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 19090 out of 231384 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.752400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.752400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 231384 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 94.7452 to 110.7733 deg, Dec +0.5711 to +11.3153 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 94.7452 to 110.7733 deg, Dec 0.5711 to 11.3153 deg
Loaded 21806 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11920 out of 19090 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 19090 out of 231384 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 230229 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 94.7621 to 110.7855 deg, Dec +0.5785 to +11.3194 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 94.7621 to 110.7855 deg, Dec 0.5785 to 11.3194 deg
Loaded 21805 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11969 out of 19080 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 19080 out of 230229 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 148 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
2.1 pix Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
2.5 pix fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
2.5 pix fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
15.2 mag. Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 13.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.dWFZV56Jwg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=91, blended=40564, bad_region=0, passed=231293
Got 231293 stars (including 190414 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 231293 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4809 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4809 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 231293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4808 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 231293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4808 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 231293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4808 stars left (next iteration limit 5289)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits N_match=4808 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.410 n_q1=1116 n_q2=1273 n_q3=1198 n_q4=1221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.022
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits -region wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AUpBfmYwi7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=74, blended=40389, bad_region=3, passed=230155
Got 230155 stars (including 189369 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 230155 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4813 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 230155 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4812 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 230155 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4812 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 230155 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4812 stars left (next iteration limit 5294)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits N_match=4812 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.376 n_q1=1133 n_q2=1273 n_q3=1180 n_q4=1226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.048
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -region wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qJFeFkB4lX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=3501, bad_region=4, passed=67985
Got 67985 stars (including 64394 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 67985 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4776 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67980 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67980 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67980 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4775 stars left (next iteration limit 5253)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4775 robust_rms=7.536 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.793 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4775 robust_rms=0.556 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.936 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4775 robust_rms=0.424 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.588 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4775 robust_rms_before=0.422 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.506 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.424 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.592 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.588
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.592 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits N_match=4775 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.631 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.508 n_q1=1394 n_q2=789 n_q3=1564 n_q4=1028 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.268
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ecCKuItRha (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=3263, bad_region=6, passed=65581
Got 65581 stars (including 62220 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 65581 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013118 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010494 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4773 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65578 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65578 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65580 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4771 stars left (next iteration limit 5243)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=7.652 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.726 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=0.588 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.964 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4771 robust_rms=0.431 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.588 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4771 robust_rms_before=1.288 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.502 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.431 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.637 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.588
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.637 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits N_match=4771 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.668 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.522 n_q1=1408 n_q2=816 n_q3=1521 n_q4=1026 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.304
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-58-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060048_TTUQ1b1x1_3962085_p5m3Cw0A/wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Mon-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 07:03:09.59 +07:40:35.6: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:50:30.46 +07:49:27.0: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:44:01.91 +03:50:57.1: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:35:55.08 +05:47:36.1: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 07:08:54.80 +05:16:20.7: 11.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 07:05:01.34 +08:55:06.4: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:25:37.80 +05:13:57.7: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:41:29.22 +04:37:30.5: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:44:01.91 +03:50:57.1: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 07:03:09.59 +07:40:35.6: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:50:30.46 +07:49:27.0: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:35:55.08 +05:47:36.1: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:03:09.59 +07:40:35.6: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6705 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:44:01.91 +03:50:57.1: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4620 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:50:30.46 +07:49:27.0: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0191 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:35:55.08 +05:47:36.1: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9550 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 07:08:54.80 +05:16:20.7: 11.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:25:37.80 +05:13:57.7: 12.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:41:29.22 +04:37:30.5: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:54.80 +05:16:20.7: ref_mag=11.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8026 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:25:37.80 +05:13:57.7: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5627 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 07:05:01.34 +08:55:06.4: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:29.22 +04:37:30.5: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3635 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:01.34 +08:55:06.4: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3024 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:31:42.68 +06:46:20.1: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:41:04.40 +09:51:49.6: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:47:13.41 +01:33:03.7: 11.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:48:26.46 +05:31:23.3: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:28:08.98 +05:58:54.6: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:31:42.68 +06:46:20.1: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:47:13.41 +01:33:03.7: 11.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:41:04.40 +09:51:49.6: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.97 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:42.68 +06:46:20.1: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2993 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:47:13.41 +01:33:03.7: ref_mag=11.97 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0152 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:04.40 +09:51:49.6: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2976 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:48:26.46 +05:31:23.3: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:48:26.46 +05:31:23.3: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1760 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:26:44.70 +08:41:43.0: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:28:08.98 +05:58:54.6: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:08.98 +05:58:54.6: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4830 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 07:03:59.84 +08:41:00.2: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:26:44.70 +08:41:43.0: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:26:44.70 +08:41:43.0: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8136 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:56:28.49 +06:00:58.3: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 07:03:59.84 +08:41:00.2: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:03:59.84 +08:41:00.2: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2636 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:56:28.49 +06:00:58.3: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:28.49 +06:00:58.3: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3580 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:55:06.51 +07:17:19.2: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:52:44.06 +06:30:22.9: 12.69 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:54:06.11 +06:39:05.0: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:44:57.51 +04:15:22.7: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:47:15.92 +02:25:04.3: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:55:06.51 +07:17:19.2: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:45:12.12 +09:41:55.5: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:52:44.06 +06:30:22.9: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:55:06.51 +07:17:19.2: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3125 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:54:06.11 +06:39:05.0: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:52:44.06 +06:30:22.9: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5452 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:06.11 +06:39:05.0: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4696 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:44:57.51 +04:15:22.7: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:44:57.51 +04:15:22.7: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4601 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:38:47.61 +06:52:43.9: 12.78 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:47:15.92 +02:25:04.3: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:47:15.92 +02:25:04.3: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4291 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:51:29.19 +09:26:12.2: 12.86 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:45:12.12 +09:41:55.5: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:45:12.12 +09:41:55.5: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6310 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:38:47.61 +06:52:43.9: 12.82 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:38:47.61 +06:52:43.9: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8091 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:44:18.64 +07:26:24.5: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:51:29.19 +09:26:12.2: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:40:46.92 +09:46:05.9: 13.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:51:29.19 +09:26:12.2: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6257 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:47:52.83 +08:01:51.5: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 07:20:58.18 +00:53:43.7: 11.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 07:09:51.67 +09:15:50.0: 12.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:44:18.64 +07:26:24.5: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:39:31.52 +08:20:23.7: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:40:46.92 +09:46:05.9: 13.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:47:52.83 +08:01:51.5: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:44:18.64 +07:26:24.5: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6910 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:40:46.92 +09:46:05.9: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9539 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:47:52.83 +08:01:51.5: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7052 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 07:20:58.18 +00:53:43.7: 11.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:58.18 +00:53:43.7: ref_mag=11.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9793 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:47:39.14 +04:26:51.9: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 07:09:51.67 +09:15:50.0: 12.63 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:51.67 +09:15:50.0: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3341 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:39:31.52 +08:20:23.7: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:22:45.03 +05:06:23.2: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:46:49.80 +07:54:15.6: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:39:31.52 +08:20:23.7: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9374 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 07:07:31.06 +04:59:18.9: 11.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:47:39.14 +04:26:51.9: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:47:39.14 +04:26:51.9: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7244 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:27:16.35 +09:13:11.1: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:47:42.93 +02:23:55.7: 12.85 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:22:45.03 +05:06:23.2: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:46:49.80 +07:54:15.6: 13.24 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:22:45.03 +05:06:23.2: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1910 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:46:49.80 +07:54:15.6: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9529 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:54:16.71 +05:09:33.0: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 07:07:31.06 +04:59:18.9: 11.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:31.06 +04:59:18.9: ref_mag=11.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3980 delta=-0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:41:02.36 +06:03:17.5: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:27:16.35 +09:13:11.1: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:41:34.57 +04:27:49.2: 13.32 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:47:42.93 +02:23:55.7: 12.86 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:16.35 +09:13:11.1: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1865 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:47:42.93 +02:23:55.7: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6824 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:54:16.71 +05:09:33.0: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:16.71 +05:09:33.0: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8034 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:41:02.36 +06:03:17.5: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:02.36 +06:03:17.5: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0422 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:41:34.57 +04:27:49.2: 13.41 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:34.57 +04:27:49.2: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2354 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 07:09:42.92 +01:53:09.9: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:50:17.74 +02:13:23.3: 13.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:46:24.66 +04:22:48.9: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 07:09:42.92 +01:53:09.9: 13.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:09:42.92 +01:53:09.9: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.3555 delta=1.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:50:17.74 +02:13:23.3: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:53:55.52 +05:16:32.0: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:50:17.74 +02:13:23.3: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4793 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:46:24.66 +04:22:48.9: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:46:24.66 +04:22:48.9: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1300 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:37:25.62 +07:45:11.4: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:53:55.52 +05:16:32.0: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:53:55.52 +05:16:32.0: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1547 delta=1.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:37:25.62 +07:45:11.4: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:37:25.62 +07:45:11.4: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3300 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:39:19.73 +01:05:25.5: 13.10 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:39:19.73 +01:05:25.5: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:39:19.73 +01:05:25.5: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0453 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:50:00.66 +01:46:34.4: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:56:48.13 +05:00:31.0: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:50:00.66 +01:46:34.4: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:50:00.66 +01:46:34.4: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8199 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:56:48.13 +05:00:31.0: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:56:48.13 +05:00:31.0: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9135 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 07:00:12.16 +02:39:10.9: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 07:00:12.16 +02:39:10.9: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:00:12.16 +02:39:10.9: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8031 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:43:56.41 +01:44:59.5: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:43:56.41 +01:44:59.5: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:43:56.41 +01:44:59.5: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5862 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:36:36.99 +01:10:33.3: 13.91 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:36:36.99 +01:10:33.3: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:36:36.99 +01:10:33.3: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.8273 delta=1.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 07:02:59.44 +01:09:54.3: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 07:02:59.44 +01:09:54.3: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:02:59.44 +01:09:54.3: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1620 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:47:40.68 +08:06:36.2: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 07:10:23.19 +06:29:11.3: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:47:40.68 +08:06:36.2: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:47:40.68 +08:06:36.2: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7585 delta=1.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 07:10:23.19 +06:29:11.3: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:10:23.19 +06:29:11.3: ref_mag=12.03 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0514 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:56:45.38 +01:03:55.9: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:56:45.38 +01:03:55.9: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:56:45.38 +01:03:55.9: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9745 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:32:58.59 +03:43:59.0: 13.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:32:58.59 +03:43:59.0: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:32:58.59 +03:43:59.0: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8003 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out08068.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out09250.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out09605.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out11299.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out121257.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out163114.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out22882.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out23061.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31762.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out39665.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out63055.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74541.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out86904.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92913.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 206s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261174_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 261174_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261182_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 261182_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:02.68 +06:47:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261185_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 261185_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261193_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 261193_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:54.53 +05:47:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261200_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 261200_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261202_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 261202_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:26.97 +08:19:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261207_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 261207_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:58.18 +08:08:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261211_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 261211_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261213_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 261213_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:09.11 +07:51:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261218_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 261218_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:36.27 +08:27:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261224_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 261224_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261229_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 261229_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261230_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 261230_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261235_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 261235_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261236_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 261236_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:42.84 +06:27:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261240_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 261240_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:48.38 +08:53:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261243_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 261243_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:17.12 +01:29:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261244_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 261244_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:17.15 +01:47:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261580_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 261580_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:07.71 +00:50:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261618_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 261618_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:53.73 +04:36:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261668_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 261668_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:32.77 +00:47:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261724_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 261724_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:03.88 +02:21:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261770_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 261770_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:35.37 +08:59:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261790_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 261790_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:43.50 +04:58:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261921_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 261921_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:11.36 +10:40:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261976_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 261976_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:47.32 +08:27:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261996_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 261996_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:18.72 +04:52:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262010_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262010_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262017_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262017_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:20.94 +05:11:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262028_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262028_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262049_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262049_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:55.37 +07:27:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262059_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262059_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262065_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262065_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:51.81 +06:55:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262107_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262107_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:59.37 +09:55:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262150_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262150_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:53.75 +02:20:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262159_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262159_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262192_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262192_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:12.93 +03:46:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262207_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262207_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:30.10 +06:05:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262223_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262223_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262271_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262271_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:54.71 +02:22:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262277_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262277_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:42.08 +00:49:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262315_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262315_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:43.45 +10:23:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262323_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262323_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:29.06 +05:32:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262339_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262339_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262358_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262358_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:14.25 +10:19:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262367_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262367_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:43.04 +02:39:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262384_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262384_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:28.51 +09:11:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262388_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262388_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:06.49 +01:14:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262406_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262406_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:05.11 +07:33:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262413_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262413_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262418_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262418_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:17.57 +07:16:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262428_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262428_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:17.38 +07:59:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262455_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262455_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:10.38 +10:35:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262483_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262483_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:45.16 +07:35:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262490_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262490_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:32.23 +03:08:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262493_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262493_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262503_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262503_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:59.54 +04:24:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262506_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262506_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:51.08 +04:25:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262527_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262527_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:06.00 +09:00:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262534_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262534_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:22.70 +06:14:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262547_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262547_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:35.36 +06:43:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262550_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262550_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:04.01 +05:36:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262572_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262572_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:01.37 +06:14:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262574_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262574_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:37.70 +10:34:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262581_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262581_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262585_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262585_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262597_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262597_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:58.70 +08:54:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262598_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262598_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262600_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262600_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262619_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262619_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:59.42 +07:21:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262625_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262625_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:04.13 +05:39:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262627_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262627_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262665_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262665_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262671_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262671_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:56.75 +09:19:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262675_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262675_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262680_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262680_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:47.35 +03:48:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262682_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262682_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:44.31 +04:42:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262702_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262702_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262715_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262715_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:14.05 +08:04:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262728_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262728_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262786_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262786_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262858_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262858_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262872_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262872_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:47.89 +07:13:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262885_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262885_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262905_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262905_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:18.30 +10:08:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262916_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262916_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262924_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262924_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:15.26 +02:50:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262959_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262959_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262965_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 262965_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263006_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 263006_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:17.27 +08:08:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263017_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 263017_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263019_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 263019_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263023_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 263023_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263024_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 263024_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263039_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 263039_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263080_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 263080_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:06.45 +05:24:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263176_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 263176_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263222_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 263222_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263310_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 263310_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263335_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 263335_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263354_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 263354_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:59.05 +06:34:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22882_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
Preparing report for the candidate 22882_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74541_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
Preparing report for the candidate 74541_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31762_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
Preparing report for the candidate 31762_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127250_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 127250_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:10.37 +06:40:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39586_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 39586_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:48.55 +02:43:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92913_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
Preparing report for the candidate 92913_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176533_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 176533_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:48.01 +08:29:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150359_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 150359_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:55.85 +07:36:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140565_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 140565_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:06.05 +07:11:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156097_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 156097_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74727_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 74727_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:50.29 +04:21:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173886_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 173886_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:25.58 +08:33:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40196_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 40196_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:33.70 +02:39:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09605_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
Preparing report for the candidate 09605_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161486_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 161486_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:05.62 +08:00:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37326_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 37326_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:02.99 +02:33:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22685_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 22685_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86904_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
Preparing report for the candidate 86904_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30620_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 30620_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:20.64 +02:08:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79130_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 79130_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:32.89 +04:39:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210564_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 210564_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:08.57 +10:45:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39665_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
Preparing report for the candidate 39665_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161833_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 161833_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:15.75 +08:02:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06300_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 06300_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:31.29 +01:05:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96041_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 96041_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:39.00 +05:21:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167119_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 167119_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:23.53 +08:13:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23061_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
Preparing report for the candidate 23061_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195551_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 195551_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:05.52 +09:02:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11299_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
Preparing report for the candidate 11299_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81305_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 81305_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:59.93 +04:41:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76119_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 76119_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.79 +04:30:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09250_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
Preparing report for the candidate 09250_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163114_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
Preparing report for the candidate 163114_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121257_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
Preparing report for the candidate 121257_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08068_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
Preparing report for the candidate 08068_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18338_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 18338_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:33.64 +01:27:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63055_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
Preparing report for the candidate 63055_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82236_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 82236_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:37.06 +04:35:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65952_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 65952_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:38.39 +04:01:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54200_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 54200_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:45.24 +03:18:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69220_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 69220_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:41.11 +04:04:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 225680_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 225680_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:42.58 +10:01:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21589_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 21589_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:19.86 +01:44:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76765_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 76765_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:10.62 +04:23:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49142_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 49142_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:50.66 +03:09:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161869_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 161869_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:39.23 +07:58:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51094_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174
The candidate 51094_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_06-00-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174 did not pass the final checks
