This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 16.4412* 05 21 07.65 +23 38 19.6 9.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
N Tau,2461268.9412,9.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
N Tau 20260816.4412 9.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.4412 2461268.9412 11.84 05:49:24.65 +24:02:55.8
184.62172 -1.80319 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 10.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.22 Kalliope -0 0 1 12.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:49:24.65 +24:02:55.8: 14.87 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:24.65 +24:02:55.8: 14.76 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.10
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 16.4412* 05 49 24.65 +24 02 55.8 11.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461268.9412,11.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260816.4412 11.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 16.4412* 05 21 07.66 +23 38 19.3 9.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461268.9412,9.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260816.4412 9.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.4412 2461268.9412 13.93 05:33:14.19 +22:22:38.5
184.08789 -5.84278 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 10.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.566 Stereoskopia 0 -0 0 14.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:33:14.19 +22:22:38.5: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:33:14.19 +22:22:38.5: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 16.4412* 05 33 14.19 +22 22 38.5 13.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461268.9412,13.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260816.4412 13.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.4412 2461268.9412 14.46 05:16:46.59 +21:12:06.5
182.95694 -9.68011 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 10.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.268 Adorea -0 -1 1 14.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:16:46.59 +21:12:06.5: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:16:46.59 +21:12:06.5: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 16.4412* 05 16 46.59 +21 12 06.5 14.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461268.9412,14.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260816.4412 14.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.4412 2461268.9412 14.36 05:23:15.67 +20:08:49.4
184.70012 -9.00601 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 10.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.377 Campania 0 -0 0 14.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:23:15.67 +20:08:49.4: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:23:15.67 +20:08:49.4: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 16.4412* 05 23 15.67 +20 08 49.4 14.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461268.9412,14.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260816.4412 14.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461268.94159938 16.08.2026 10:35:44.186 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 18775
Objects passed selection criteria: 18683
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13779.5
Average stars matched: 13091 (95.0034 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 243536 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 16 05:39:00 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461268.94159938 16.08.2026 10:35:44.186 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 149
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 40 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 143724
Objects passed selection criteria: 143255
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 107121
Average stars matched: 99981.5 (93.3353 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 538280 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 16 05:46:21 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461268.94076252
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.519 +22:00:10.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:19.519 +22:00:10.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0035 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:22.439 +22:00:55.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:22.439 +22:00:55.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0196 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:19.519 +22:00:10.39
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:22.439 +22:00:55.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01696 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.q72FD0Il0R
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SWVUjor5kX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Nv5La3Jk0p
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Bcqasin1IF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.969200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.969200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec +16.4876 to +27.3008 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec 16.4876 to 27.3008 deg
Loaded 12329 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8847 out of 10017 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10017 out of 20916 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.2 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.q72FD0Il0R (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2479, bad_region=3694, passed=22997
Got 22997 stars (including 17090 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4775 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4774 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4705 stars left (next iteration limit 5175)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4705 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=1788 n_q2=376 n_q3=1844 n_q4=697 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.193
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SWVUjor5kX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2320, bad_region=3377, passed=20916
Got 20916 stars (including 15475 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4776 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4707 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4707 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4777 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4708 stars left (next iteration limit 5177)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4708 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.402 n_q1=1784 n_q2=371 n_q3=1863 n_q4=690 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Nv5La3Jk0p (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=752, bad_region=3861, passed=13198
Got 13198 stars (including 8791 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13198 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4791 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4710 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4711 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4710 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4791 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4710 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4710 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 4710 stars left (next iteration limit 5181)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4710 robust_rms=7.056 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.353 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4710 robust_rms=0.481 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.562 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4710 robust_rms=0.443 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.476 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4710 robust_rms_before=0.882 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.523 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.443 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.620 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.476
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.510 +22:00:09.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 13198 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3148938.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.882 -> 0.443 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits N_match=4710 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.484 n_q1=1267 n_q2=1212 n_q3=998 n_q4=1233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Bcqasin1IF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=791, bad_region=3875, passed=13139
Got 13139 stars (including 8692 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13139 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4792 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10114 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4793 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10114 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10114 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4714 stars left (next iteration limit 5186)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4714 robust_rms=6.982 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.236 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4714 robust_rms=0.501 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.574 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4714 robust_rms=0.455 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.478 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4714 robust_rms_before=0.910 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.527 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.455 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.620 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.478
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:22.421 +22:00:55.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 13139 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3148978.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.910 -> 0.455 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits N_match=4714 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.557 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.504 n_q1=1269 n_q2=1222 n_q3=990 n_q4=1233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.386 worst_q_ratio=1.193
ref2=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits sigma_overall=0.515 worst_q_ratio=1.175
new1=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits sigma_overall=0.474 worst_q_ratio=1.083
new2=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits sigma_overall=0.503 worst_q_ratio=1.107
reference average sigma_overall=0.4505 worst_q_ratio=1.184
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (4705 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_astrometric_residuals.png (4708 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498_astrometric_residuals.png (4710 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499_astrometric_residuals.png (4714 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:49:24.65 +24:02:55.8: 14.87 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:46:12.64 +25:18:43.0: 10.79 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:24.65 +24:02:55.8: 14.76 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:46:12.64 +25:18:43.0: 10.82 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:49:24.65 +24:02:55.8: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=11.8415 delta=2.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.80 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:46:12.64 +25:18:43.0: ref_mag=10.80 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2781 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32310.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 232s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30583_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 30583_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30780_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
Preparing report for the candidate 30780_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32272_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 32272_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:09.67 +19:28:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32310_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
Preparing report for the candidate 32310_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.32 +17:54:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03444_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 03444_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.71 +25:25:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 234s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:49:24.65 +24:02:55.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.510 +22:00:09.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:19.510 +22:00:09.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0033 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:22.421 +22:00:55.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:22.421 +22:00:55.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0194 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:19.510 +22:00:09.63
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:22.421 +22:00:55.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01694 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cVR0s8YL4r
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HmNVezNXM7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fRNKrtAwRN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qg6BSCca8T
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 163013 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec +16.4845 to +27.3051 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec 16.4845 to 27.3051 deg
Loaded 12419 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7184 out of 10475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10475 out of 163013 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 131 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
1.8 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.cVR0s8YL4r (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=21684, bad_region=23036, passed=167940
Got 167940 stars (including 124901 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4762 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4763 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4714 stars left (next iteration limit 5185)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4714 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=1719 n_q2=437 n_q3=1839 n_q4=719 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.214
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HmNVezNXM7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=20219, bad_region=22244, passed=162977
Got 162977 stars (including 121992 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 162977 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4706 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4706 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 145759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 145759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4704 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 145759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4704 stars left (next iteration limit 5176)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4704 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.615 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.412 n_q1=1720 n_q2=418 n_q3=1843 n_q4=723 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.238
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fRNKrtAwRN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=7211, bad_region=16997, passed=89356
Got 89356 stars (including 66943 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 89356 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4776 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4709 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76984 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4776 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76984 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76984 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4708 stars left (next iteration limit 5178)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4708 robust_rms=7.322 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=7.937 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4708 robust_rms=0.481 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.568 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4708 robust_rms=0.439 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.467 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4708 robust_rms_before=0.444 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.504 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.439 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.467 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.467
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.467 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits N_match=4708 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.565 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.493 n_q1=1314 n_q2=1156 n_q3=1025 n_q4=1213 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.106
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qg6BSCca8T (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=7020, bad_region=17315, passed=90504
Got 90504 stars (including 68077 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 90504 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4774 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4709 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4710 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4709 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4775 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4710 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4709 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4709 stars left (next iteration limit 5179)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4709 robust_rms=7.272 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=7.787 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4709 robust_rms=0.507 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.596 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4709 robust_rms=0.453 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.486 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4709 robust_rms_before=0.456 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.517 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.453 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.492 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.486
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.492 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits N_match=4709 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.537 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.576 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.541 n_q1=1324 n_q2=1144 n_q3=1030 n_q4=1211 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.073
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-34-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0498.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_053647_TTUQ2b1x1_3109016_8ZeoYA5a/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:36:09.25 +22:34:57.7: 13.96 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:41:53.58 +18:13:04.8: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:17:46.05 +21:48:29.4: 14.46 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:28:42.47 +20:00:32.2: 14.82 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:24:25.69 +18:52:38.0: 14.77 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:22:01.89 +20:10:48.7: 14.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:28:53.78 +22:47:09.9: 13.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:34:17.67 +19:09:23.2: 13.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:17:46.05 +21:48:29.4: 14.61 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:28:42.47 +20:00:32.2: 14.71 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:41:53.58 +18:13:04.8: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:24:25.69 +18:52:38.0: 14.95 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:36:09.25 +22:34:57.7: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:22:01.89 +20:10:48.7: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:53.58 +18:13:04.8: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6772 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:24:25.69 +18:52:38.0: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5041 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:17:46.05 +21:48:29.4: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6762 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:28:42.47 +20:00:32.2: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5458 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:09.25 +22:34:57.7: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2025 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:22:01.89 +20:10:48.7: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0625 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:28:53.78 +22:47:09.9: 13.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:28:53.78 +22:47:09.9: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6558 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:38:28.33 +18:08:42.8: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:34:17.67 +19:09:23.2: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:17.67 +19:09:23.2: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7102 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:44:40.74 +22:38:17.6: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:38:28.33 +18:08:42.8: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:38:28.33 +18:08:42.8: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5756 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:32:24.10 +20:11:58.1: 13.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:37:07.12 +19:55:46.2: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:27:16.51 +25:47:28.8: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:23:46.34 +20:57:55.2: 13.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:44:40.74 +22:38:17.6: 13.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:44:40.74 +22:38:17.6: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6832 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:32:24.10 +20:11:58.1: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:27:16.51 +25:47:28.8: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:23:46.34 +20:57:55.2: 13.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:37:07.12 +19:55:46.2: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:34:07.79 +24:25:08.6: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:24.10 +20:11:58.1: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6552 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:16.51 +25:47:28.8: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6852 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:23:46.34 +20:57:55.2: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6839 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:07.12 +19:55:46.2: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4434 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:34:07.79 +24:25:08.6: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:07.79 +24:25:08.6: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0466 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:48:36.04 +24:35:52.1: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:48:36.04 +24:35:52.1: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:48:36.04 +24:35:52.1: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8646 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:21.62 +25:20:29.1: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:21.62 +25:20:29.1: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:21.62 +25:20:29.1: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3210 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:37:40.14 +22:58:28.5: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:37:40.14 +22:58:28.5: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:40.14 +22:58:28.5: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6522 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:15:00.49 +20:57:15.9: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:33:14.19 +22:22:38.5: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:15:00.49 +20:57:15.9: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:15:00.49 +20:57:15.9: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8168 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:36:43.57 +19:59:04.3: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:33:14.19 +22:22:38.5: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:41:20.39 +23:20:37.9: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:36:43.57 +19:59:04.3: 14.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:43:56.20 +25:06:05.8: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:43.57 +19:59:04.3: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9217 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:38:53.61 +18:38:43.9: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:36:38.45 +20:13:50.5: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:21:48.82 +23:33:33.6: 14.41 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:41:20.39 +23:20:37.9: 13.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:20.39 +23:20:37.9: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9885 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:43:56.20 +25:06:05.8: 14.02 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:43:56.20 +25:06:05.8: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0626 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:16:46.59 +21:12:06.5: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:38:53.61 +18:38:43.9: 14.04 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:38:53.61 +18:38:43.9: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9260 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:23:15.67 +20:08:49.4: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:36:38.45 +20:13:50.5: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:21:48.82 +23:33:33.6: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:21:48.82 +23:33:33.6: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2794 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:38.45 +20:13:50.5: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0991 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:16:46.59 +21:12:06.5: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:23:15.67 +20:08:49.4: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:38:00.37 +26:13:07.3: 14.64 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:13:05.05 +20:18:42.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:38:00.37 +26:13:07.3: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:38:00.37 +26:13:07.3: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6313 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:13:05.05 +20:18:42.0: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:13:05.05 +20:18:42.0: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2388 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out14597.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out199579.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out202648.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out203683.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 87s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189043_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 189043_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189044_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 189044_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189051_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 189051_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189058_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 189058_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189062_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 189062_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:28.33 +21:30:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189063_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 189063_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189066_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 189066_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:09.61 +21:24:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189068_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 189068_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:06.77 +22:14:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189069_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 189069_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189083_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 189083_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:14.71 +21:13:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189084_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 189084_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:12.03 +18:57:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189085_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 189085_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:55.50 +23:05:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189086_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 189086_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189087_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 189087_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189090_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 189090_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:39.81 +25:57:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189092_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 189092_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189093_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 189093_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189096_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 189096_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189097_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 189097_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:30.25 +19:22:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189099_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 189099_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189100_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 189100_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189102_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 189102_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:42.17 +20:52:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189103_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 189103_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189105_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 189105_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:26.63 +25:17:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189109_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 189109_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:06.32 +17:57:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189110_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 189110_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189111_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 189111_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:17.19 +18:20:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189114_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 189114_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:16.92 +20:08:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189304_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
Preparing report for the candidate 189304_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190397_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 190397_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:52.06 +19:58:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190982_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 190982_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.14 +22:38:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192764_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 192764_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:11.73 +19:34:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192859_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 192859_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:00.61 +20:46:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192893_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 192893_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:37.00 +25:05:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192969_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 192969_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:54.80 +23:40:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192991_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 192991_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:10.95 +20:10:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193047_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 193047_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:00.26 +18:59:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193700_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 193700_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:54.33 +26:06:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193734_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 193734_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:11.78 +22:40:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193868_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 193868_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:37.42 +18:52:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193927_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 193927_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194016_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 194016_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:34.20 +17:39:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194060_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 194060_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:02.92 +18:33:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194278_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 194278_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:32.27 +22:45:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194313_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 194313_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:40.12 +20:26:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194594_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 194594_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:42.22 +23:00:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194724_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 194724_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:23.23 +25:24:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194936_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 194936_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.79 +19:32:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195012_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 195012_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:27.12 +20:53:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195019_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 195019_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:08.61 +20:02:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195171_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 195171_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:10.61 +20:05:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195189_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 195189_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:11.27 +18:40:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195225_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 195225_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:44.04 +26:10:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195340_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 195340_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:51.07 +20:15:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195367_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 195367_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:37.50 +22:22:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195378_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 195378_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:59.72 +22:34:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195442_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 195442_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:29.53 +21:46:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195510_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 195510_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:41.38 +20:56:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195578_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 195578_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:14.92 +19:35:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196014_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 196014_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:05.74 +23:11:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196232_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 196232_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196321_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 196321_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:20.40 +25:08:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196331_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 196331_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:56.30 +20:14:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196358_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 196358_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:15.66 +18:46:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196634_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 196634_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:22.42 +23:21:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196730_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 196730_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:25.28 +23:07:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196760_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 196760_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:24.97 +18:04:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196857_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 196857_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:27.48 +21:47:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196884_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 196884_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:17.35 +20:45:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196895_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 196895_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:29.12 +18:44:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196957_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 196957_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:13.65 +25:22:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197079_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 197079_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:02.29 +24:22:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197208_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 197208_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:00.23 +24:57:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197289_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 197289_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:50.27 +25:14:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197407_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 197407_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:04.52 +20:26:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197434_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 197434_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:11.49 +25:40:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197532_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 197532_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:51.83 +26:02:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197645_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 197645_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197657_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 197657_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.73 +22:39:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197667_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 197667_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:37.89 +18:57:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197691_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 197691_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:20.30 +24:24:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197697_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 197697_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:21.93 +24:21:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197814_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 197814_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:30.37 +20:09:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197820_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 197820_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:08.25 +22:06:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197983_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 197983_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:06.25 +24:25:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198181_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 198181_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:42.89 +24:06:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198187_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 198187_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:56.30 +18:54:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198381_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 198381_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:57.42 +25:53:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198497_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 198497_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:45.64 +21:24:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198524_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 198524_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:07.02 +24:22:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198690_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 198690_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:38.22 +22:58:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198694_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 198694_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:51.79 +20:00:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198695_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 198695_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:20.87 +24:22:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198773_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 198773_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:31.27 +19:46:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198827_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 198827_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:39.48 +21:58:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198834_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 198834_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199113_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 199113_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:39.92 +21:50:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199235_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 199235_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:42.92 +19:58:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199243_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 199243_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:04.12 +21:09:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199432_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 199432_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:24.35 +18:32:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199502_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 199502_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:30.06 +21:58:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199578_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 199578_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:51.89 +23:51:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199579_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
Preparing report for the candidate 199579_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199628_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 199628_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:58.95 +21:26:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199813_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 199813_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:37.28 +25:18:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199867_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 199867_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:28.02 +21:07:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200000_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 200000_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200125_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 200125_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:37.82 +19:23:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200330_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 200330_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:39.26 +20:14:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200772_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 200772_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:09.44 +18:20:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200824_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 200824_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:42.17 +22:29:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200877_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 200877_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200946_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 200946_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:15.24 +22:17:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201065_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 201065_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:49.67 +25:55:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201099_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 201099_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201221_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 201221_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:58.21 +20:38:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201446_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 201446_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201502_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 201502_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:56.40 +22:27:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201799_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 201799_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202238_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 202238_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202648_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
Preparing report for the candidate 202648_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203683_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
Preparing report for the candidate 203683_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203844_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 203844_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:20.26 +23:22:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.29 +17:54:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65420_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 65420_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:30.58 +22:47:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:00.37 +26:13:07.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.63, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.61)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.064 3441182743074861696 084.50176039727 +26.21923301670 13.5996 11.3482 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.064#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180008_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 180008_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46225_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 46225_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:24.64 +24:02:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:28.99 +24:09:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:18.08 +20:22:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25835_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499
The candidate 25835_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_05-35-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0499 did not pass the final checks
