NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Tau-06-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 08 16.40891    2461268.90891    13.74    04:36:33.61 +17:02:40.0   6092 5127   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.72    04:36:33.50 +17:02:39.8   6090 5126   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 16.4092  2461268.9092  13.73  04:36:33.56 +17:02:39.9
180.62394 -19.79793 galactic  Tau  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 2.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
53 Kalypso                 -0      0       0  13.6    -0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:36:33.56 +17:02:39.9:  16.22 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:36:33.56 +17:02:39.9:  16.16 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Tau-06-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 08 16.40891    2461268.90891    14.32    04:35:29.41 +16:18:52.5   5967 4676   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    14.33    04:35:29.67 +16:18:52.2   5965 4675   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 16.4092  2461268.9092  14.32  04:35:29.54 +16:18:52.4
181.06798 -20.44920 galactic  Tau  Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.7" and 1.8 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
670 Ottegebe                 0      0       0  14.4     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:35:29.54 +16:18:52.4:  16.18 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:35:29.54 +16:18:52.4:  16.14 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Tau-06-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 2

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 reference image: Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 reference image: Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
Field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Tau-06-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Tau-06-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Tau-06-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 856593 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 856593 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits_preview.png'
Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits

renamed 'Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits_preview.png'
Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 559.8035 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 711.9893 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1422.1275 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 643.1260 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1422.7335 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 643.7338 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.5404 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 24.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-16T04:48:40.1511138' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-16T09:48:40.1511138' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61268.4087980441 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-16T09:48:50.0581341' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61268.4089127085 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 66.665507879332 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 14.0001171287273 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 35.0941666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 96.4502777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.73600542948405 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Tau-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 26 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29508 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29508 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 57.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 905.69 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 24.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.00032 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/d_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits :) Spent 0.657112 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/d_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 24.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-16T04:49:23.3158859' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-16T09:49:23.3158859' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61268.4092976274 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-16T09:49:33.2188527' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61268.4094122453 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 66.6655078272555 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 14.0001171204064 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 35.2461111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 96.5647222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.72952145648354 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Tau-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 26 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29508 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29508 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 57.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 905.69 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 24.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.00032 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/d_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits :) Spent 0.745071 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/d_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits


fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461268.90891378 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:26:46.153 +13:59:00.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 Second-epoch image center 04:26:46.153 +13:59:00.74 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0302 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:26:47.162 +13:59:02.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 Second-epoch image center 04:26:47.162 +13:59:02.01 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0335 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:26:46.153 +13:59:00.74 Second-epoch second image center 04:26:47.162 +13:59:02.01 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00409 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aeZPHWcdJu Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ppRXH0iwgU Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits &> /tmp/tmp.th7OoLoxFi Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sRSCYFFuKX Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg Loaded 4391 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3406 out of 3669 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3669 out of 9344 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.989100 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.989100 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3894 to 74.9279 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg Loaded 4391 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3406 out of 3669 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3669 out of 9344 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (aperture=6.0) Read 8488 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.4321 to 74.9939 deg, Dec +8.6216 to +19.2870 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.4321 to 74.9939 deg, Dec 8.6216 to 19.2870 deg Loaded 4407 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3650 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3650 out of 8488 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (aperture=5.9) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 2.0 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 2.9 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits 2.9 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 15.3 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 14.2 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits 14.1 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.aeZPHWcdJu (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=728, bad_region=0, passed=9344 Got 9344 stars (including 8597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9344 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9344 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9344 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1309 n_q2=1102 n_q3=1429 n_q4=1041 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.263 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.ppRXH0iwgU (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=679, bad_region=1, passed=8488 Got 8488 stars (including 7793 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8488 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4883 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8488 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8488 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8488 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5371) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.242 n_q1=1282 n_q2=1141 n_q3=1405 n_q4=1054 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.472 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.th7OoLoxFi (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=300, bad_region=0, passed=5831 Got 5831 stars (including 5528 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5831 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4868 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5831 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5831 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5831 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4869 stars left (next iteration limit 5354) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=12.165 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.857 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.419 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.458 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.326 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.392 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4869 robust_rms_before=1.183 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.321 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.326 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.392 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.392 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.392 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits N_match=4869 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.322 n_q1=1087 n_q2=1334 n_q3=1162 n_q4=1286 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.205 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.sRSCYFFuKX (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=298, bad_region=0, passed=5815 Got 5815 stars (including 5512 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5815 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4865 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5815 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5815 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5815 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4866 stars left (next iteration limit 5350) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=12.232 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.775 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=0.412 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.434 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=0.323 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.408 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4866 robust_rms_before=1.160 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.320 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.323 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.393 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.408 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.393 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits N_match=4866 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.308 n_q1=1091 n_q2=1325 n_q3=1169 n_q4=1281 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.223 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits sigma_overall=0.294 worst_q_ratio=1.263 ref2=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits sigma_overall=0.322 worst_q_ratio=1.472 new1=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits sigma_overall=0.321 worst_q_ratio=1.205 new2=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits sigma_overall=0.324 worst_q_ratio=1.223 reference average sigma_overall=0.308 worst_q_ratio=1.3675 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151_astrometric_residuals.png (4881 matched stars from wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147_astrometric_residuals.png (4882 matched stars from wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107_astrometric_residuals.png (4869 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108_astrometric_residuals.png (4866 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20340_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 20340_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    11.71    04:54:18.49 +11:10:44.8   8969 1788   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits **** FOUND 04:54:18.47 +11:10:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 02564_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 02564_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    9.88    04:25:27.21 +16:33:23.0   4509 4731   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits **** FOUND 04:25:27.21 +16:33:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 06530_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 06530_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    11.42    04:43:24.03 +11:35:05.9   7322 1911   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits **** FOUND 04:43:24.04 +11:35:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01595_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 01595_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    10.78    04:52:02.18 +17:32:15.5   8306 5608   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits **** FOUND 04:52:02.17 +17:32:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:26:46.153 +13:59:00.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 Second-epoch image center 04:26:46.153 +13:59:00.74 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0302 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:26:47.162 +13:59:02.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:26:39.840 +13:59:58.72 Second-epoch image center 04:26:47.162 +13:59:02.01 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0335 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:26:46.153 +13:59:00.74 Second-epoch second image center 04:26:47.162 +13:59:02.01 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00409 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FDKyZ0KR0h Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Rq1S6QtFkO Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gJr4fD6DS8 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hzI058EwAq Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 62263 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg Loaded 4417 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3083 out of 3672 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3672 out of 62263 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.852800 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.852800 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 62263 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec +8.6217 to +19.2873 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.3895 to 74.9801 deg, Dec 8.6217 to 19.2873 deg Loaded 4417 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3083 out of 3672 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3672 out of 62263 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (aperture=4.5) Read 58309 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 58.4014 to 74.9981 deg, Dec +8.6064 to +19.2869 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 58.4014 to 74.9981 deg, Dec 8.6064 to 19.2869 deg Loaded 4433 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3131 out of 3673 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3673 out of 58309 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (aperture=4.5) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 108 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 1.8 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 2.7 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits 2.7 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 15.5 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 14.6 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits 14.6 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.FDKyZ0KR0h (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=3506, bad_region=5, passed=62251 Got 62251 stars (including 58597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62251 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62251 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62251 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62251 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4885 stars left (next iteration limit 5373) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits N_match=4885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1302 n_q2=1091 n_q3=1432 n_q4=1060 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.Rq1S6QtFkO (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3080, bad_region=5, passed=58299 Got 58299 stars (including 55093 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58299 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58299 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58299 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58299 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4884 stars left (next iteration limit 5372) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits N_match=4884 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.235 n_q1=1266 n_q2=1129 n_q3=1416 n_q4=1073 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.486 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.gJr4fD6DS8 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1100, bad_region=22, passed=31616 Got 31616 stars (including 30444 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31616 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4870 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31616 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31616 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31616 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4870 stars left (next iteration limit 5357) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=12.894 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.707 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.420 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.454 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.324 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.384 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4870 robust_rms_before=1.176 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.318 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.324 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.375 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.384 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.375 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits N_match=4870 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=1096 n_q2=1303 n_q3=1201 n_q4=1270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.199 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.hzI058EwAq (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1096, bad_region=21, passed=31593 Got 31593 stars (including 30420 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31593 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4866 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31593 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31593 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31593 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4866 stars left (next iteration limit 5352) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=12.839 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.605 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=0.415 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.430 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=0.322 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.408 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4866 robust_rms_before=1.153 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.316 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.322 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.383 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.408 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.383 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits N_match=4866 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=1094 n_q2=1301 n_q3=1193 n_q4=1278 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.222 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:02:38.73 +11:19:31.9: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:19:54.85 +10:10:25.3: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:19:30.77 +11:59:01.9: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:02:38.73 +11:19:31.9: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:19:54.85 +10:10:25.3: 13.56 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.71 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:38.73 +11:19:31.9: ref_mag=11.71 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7821 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:54.85 +10:10:25.3: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7277 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:19:30.77 +11:59:01.9: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:30.77 +11:59:01.9: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7181 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:38:35.53 +17:25:28.5: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:35:39.15 +16:08:30.8: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:38:35.53 +17:25:28.5: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:35.53 +17:25:28.5: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4399 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:39:11.25 +17:52:56.5: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:03:28.39 +18:01:07.3: 14.01 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:21:31.40 +14:26:00.1: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:36:33.56 +17:02:39.9: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:35:39.15 +16:08:30.8: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:35:39.15 +16:08:30.8: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6650 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:39:11.25 +17:52:56.5: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:03:28.39 +18:01:07.3: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:21:31.40 +14:26:00.1: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:11.25 +17:52:56.5: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6159 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:28.39 +18:01:07.3: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9263 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:31.40 +14:26:00.1: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8219 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:36:33.56 +17:02:39.9: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:34:19.02 +12:36:41.9: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:25:38.66 +17:55:23.9: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:34:19.02 +12:36:41.9: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:19.02 +12:36:41.9: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8049 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:25:38.66 +17:55:23.9: 14.02 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:38.66 +17:55:23.9: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0639 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits at 04:35:29.54 +16:18:52.4: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits at 04:35:29.54 +16:18:52.4: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76432.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76677.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 44s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75632_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 75632_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 16.40891    2461268.90891    13.83    04:19:54.76 +10:10:23.9   3903 0845   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.67    04:19:54.94 +10:10:26.8   3901 0846   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75643_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 75643_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 16.40891    2461268.90891    11.86    04:02:38.73 +11:19:31.9   1304 1426   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    11.71    04:02:38.74 +11:19:32.0   1302 1426   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75704_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 75704_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    10.79    04:19:52.97 +15:54:19.6   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75757_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 75757_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    11.50    04:15:32.99 +16:25:10.0   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75818_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 75818_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    11.80    04:27:16.24 +11:09:53.8   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75827_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 75827_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    12.21    04:04:32.20 +15:54:54.1   1492 4215   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75830_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 75830_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    11.98    04:26:24.85 +15:35:07.8   4680 4154   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits **** FOUND 04:26:24.85 +15:35:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75831_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 75831_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    11.96    04:22:48.05 +10:50:00.4   4308 1267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75842_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 75842_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    12.09    04:31:30.60 +17:36:55.1   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75849_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 75849_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    12.24    04:01:57.84 +11:30:48.1   1196 1536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75857_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 75857_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    12.15    04:25:40.31 +08:53:06.0   4798 0111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75891_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 75891_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    12.49    03:56:58.06 +09:14:33.5   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75893_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 75893_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    12.30    04:44:43.01 +13:53:24.2   7411 3314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75905_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 75905_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    12.43    04:29:01.61 +16:49:31.1   5014 4923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75917_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 75917_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    12.35    04:32:33.43 +11:25:33.4   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75943_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 75943_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    12.35    04:56:12.07 +13:30:59.6   9127 3228   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits **** FOUND 04:56:12.04 +13:30:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75961_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 75961_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    12.72    04:25:56.46 +19:03:22.8   4494 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75982_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 75982_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    12.95    04:34:56.02 +13:15:14.8   6005 2830   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75989_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 75989_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 16.40891    2461268.90891    12.73    04:19:30.74 +11:59:02.0   3790 1935   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    12.70    04:19:30.80 +11:59:01.9   3788 1935   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76018_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76018_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    12.96    04:10:47.88 +18:26:19.0   2343 5775   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits **** FOUND 04:10:47.87 +18:26:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76030_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76030_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    12.90    04:00:26.82 +13:07:34.0   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76034_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76034_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    12.68    04:49:06.79 +14:37:23.1   8022 3807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76051_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76051_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    12.83    04:56:51.22 +15:27:22.2   9120 4411   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76060_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76060_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.28    04:04:33.82 +17:59:12.1   1452 5473   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76084_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76084_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    12.95    04:18:52.03 +10:41:56.5   3730 1155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76103_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76103_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.32    03:56:46.42 +16:23:38.3   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76114_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76114_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.26    03:59:47.39 +10:38:51.5   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76133_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76133_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.11    04:05:22.35 +10:38:26.2   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76147_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76147_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.31    04:36:05.18 +16:33:10.4   6041 4825   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76156_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76156_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.33    04:00:36.56 +09:20:23.5   1029 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76159_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76159_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.37    04:30:08.20 +15:39:59.4   5216 4235   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits **** FOUND 04:30:08.21 +15:39:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76166_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76166_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.34    03:56:12.52 +16:51:49.9   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76174_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76174_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.36    03:56:43.71 +18:17:19.0   0303 5635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76177_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76177_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.10    04:33:58.31 +10:13:54.6   5982 1000   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits **** FOUND 04:33:58.34 +10:13:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76180_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76180_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.29    04:21:59.64 +14:06:14.8   4087 3229   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits **** FOUND 04:21:59.68 +14:06:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76199_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76199_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.34    03:59:54.41 +17:57:38.1   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76205_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76205_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.47    03:55:35.30 +16:02:53.4   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76237_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76237_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.56    03:56:41.98 +15:12:35.2   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76247_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76247_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.17    04:56:23.98 +13:57:14.3   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76258_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76258_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 16.40891    2461268.90891    13.43    04:38:35.56 +17:25:29.3   6370 5378   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.45    04:38:35.50 +17:25:27.7   6367 5377   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76262_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76262_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.61    04:00:49.66 +12:30:14.0   1009 2131   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits **** FOUND 04:00:49.62 +12:30:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76287_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76287_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.56    04:30:13.79 +15:39:26.6   5230 4230   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits **** FOUND 04:30:13.76 +15:39:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76298_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76298_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.62    03:59:47.97 +11:09:29.2   0877 1308   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76302_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76302_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.64    03:59:11.33 +14:23:41.0   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76305_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76305_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.38    04:45:56.45 +11:41:27.8   7694 2002   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits **** FOUND 04:45:56.57 +11:41:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76312_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76312_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.34    04:03:35.77 +13:36:27.1   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76314_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76314_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.41    03:56:00.12 +12:35:18.6   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76329_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76329_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.48    04:24:51.42 +08:57:37.8   4674 0150   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76354_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76354_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.89    04:58:13.70 +18:01:15.1   9185 5990   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76355_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76355_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    14.06    04:02:02.47 +19:01:25.8   1064 6098   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76370_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76370_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 16.40891    2461268.90891    13.66    04:35:39.12 +16:08:30.5   5998 4573   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.67    04:35:39.18 +16:08:31.2   5995 4573   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76381_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76381_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.63    03:55:15.99 +11:26:14.7   0189 1455   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76385_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76385_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.73    04:06:28.42 +09:24:53.5   1913 0287   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76395_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76395_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.55    04:56:24.60 +14:57:16.5   9081 4101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76397_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76397_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    14.16    04:14:17.47 +18:58:59.0   2831 6124   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76402_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76402_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    14.00    04:05:21.79 +18:23:55.4   1559 5727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76403_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76403_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.31    04:15:07.81 +10:03:16.9   3193 0737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76410_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76410_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 16.40891    2461268.90891    13.72    04:39:11.28 +17:52:58.0   6436 5661   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.54    04:39:11.22 +17:52:54.9   6434 5660   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76415_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76415_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 16.40891    2461268.90891    13.77    04:21:31.32 +14:26:01.0   4010 3424   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.89    04:21:31.48 +14:25:59.2   4008 3423   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76422_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76422_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.73    03:58:42.42 +11:15:28.8   0711 1363   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76424_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76424_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 16.40891    2461268.90891    13.95    04:03:28.43 +18:01:07.6   1295 5489   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.90    04:03:28.35 +18:01:07.1   1293 5489   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76432_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 Preparing report for the candidate 76432_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76444_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76444_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.60    04:48:11.65 +11:10:30.9   8054 1715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76456_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76456_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    14.24    04:00:02.16 +16:33:41.4   0819 4590   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76464_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76464_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.67    04:56:08.89 +13:42:12.6   9109 3340   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76466_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76466_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.50    04:44:04.73 +10:58:15.4   7451 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76483_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76483_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.62    04:07:23.39 +10:35:00.2   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76500_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76500_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.93    04:20:59.95 +16:06:58.9   3880 4432   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76501_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76501_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.92    03:59:46.34 +18:21:14.2   0747 5682   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76510_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76510_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 16.40891    2461268.90891    13.83    04:34:19.08 +12:36:42.1   5942 2438   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.78    04:34:18.96 +12:36:41.6   5940 2438   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76532_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76532_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    14.02    04:07:29.22 +18:12:03.3   1871 5615   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76534_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76534_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    14.18    03:59:09.12 +18:42:04.4   0650 5893   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76541_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76541_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.96    04:50:20.33 +15:22:47.6   8165 4279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76542_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76542_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    14.11    04:10:30.36 +19:09:26.0   2283 6211   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76545_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76545_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    14.22    04:01:10.27 +12:19:33.0   1063 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76556_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76556_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 16.40891    2461268.90891    14.07    04:25:38.65 +17:55:24.2   4492 5558   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-48-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    14.06    04:25:38.66 +17:55:23.7   4490 5558   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76572_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76572_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.85    04:55:52.76 +12:00:38.2   9160 2311   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76590_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76590_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.97    04:17:29.50 +18:33:15.1   3302 5882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76602_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76602_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    14.01    04:40:17.43 +12:55:14.6   6804 2683   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76606_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76606_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    14.43    04:03:30.25 +15:03:02.6   1358 3687   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76611_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76611_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.82    04:01:44.22 +10:46:19.5   1175 1084   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76623_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76623_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    14.32    03:55:04.11 +12:19:27.4   0147 1995   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76639_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76639_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.80    04:51:43.88 +17:55:19.2   8243 5837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76645_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76645_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    14.57    03:57:50.58 +11:37:53.3   0575 1586   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76646_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76646_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    14.42    04:08:01.25 +17:24:07.8   1967 5132   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76649_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76649_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    14.21    04:49:31.58 +15:01:44.5   8063 4057   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76650_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76650_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    14.01    04:38:08.27 +18:45:23.7   6247 6179   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76652_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76652_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.78    04:31:38.20 +11:19:37.2   5595 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76654_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76654_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    14.48    04:08:42.38 +16:04:03.5   2098 4327   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76658_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76658_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    14.33    04:45:54.16 +11:13:54.0   7710 1724   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76662_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76662_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    14.23    04:23:14.07 +10:17:52.4   4389 0947   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76665_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76665_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    14.62    04:04:18.17 +15:06:26.3   1474 3725   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76672_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76672_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    14.18    04:20:25.42 +13:08:20.2   3887 2637   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76676_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76676_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    14.04    04:50:12.13 +14:50:58.2   8171 3957   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76677_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 Preparing report for the candidate 76677_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76680_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76680_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    14.58    04:02:51.50 +17:36:42.1   1212 5239   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76681_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76681_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    14.41    04:12:32.74 +18:19:15.6   2598 5712   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76684_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76684_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    14.59    04:12:51.07 +15:17:51.2   2721 3885   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76690_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 76690_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    14.67    04:23:39.63 +15:16:09.2   4292 3942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54361_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 54361_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    11.68    04:54:18.51 +11:10:44.8   8969 1788   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits **** FOUND 04:54:18.48 +11:10:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 72857_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 72857_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    12.94    04:20:38.84 +17:02:03.9   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 05518_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 05518_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.44    04:56:35.50 +18:14:33.6   8934 6101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36294_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 36294_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.29    04:55:05.62 +13:07:33.2   8983 2977   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits **** FOUND 04:55:05.60 +13:07:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56370_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 56370_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    11.40    04:43:24.01 +11:35:05.7   7322 1911   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits **** FOUND 04:43:24.02 +11:35:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 09875_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 09875_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    10.78    04:52:02.16 +17:32:15.3   8306 5608   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits **** FOUND 04:52:02.16 +17:32:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 05737_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 05737_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.73    04:17:46.07 +18:22:35.8   3347 5776   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits **** FOUND 04:17:46.03 +18:22:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53427_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 53427_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.31    04:01:29.83 +12:42:19.6   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51552_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 The candidate 51552_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 16.40941    2461268.90941    13.05    04:48:57.38 +10:46:00.1   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_045209_TTUQ1b1x1_1091315_bspPgdmr/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-49-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0108.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 46s Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 04:36:33.56 +17:02:39.9 04:35:29.54 +16:18:52.4 ########### Completed Tau-06-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 04:36:33.56 +17:02:39.9 04:35:29.54 +16:18:52.4 ################################################################################### 04:36:33.56 +17:02:39.9 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 04:35:29.54 +16:18:52.4 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461268.90891378 -observatory V36 08:57:29.08 +18:26:41.8 Mercury (-1.4mag) 12:30:52.08 -04:59:48.4 Venus (-4.4mag) 06:12:55.92 +23:42:29.8 Mars (1.3mag) 08:50:15.92 +18:13:33.7 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:55:38.17 +03:08:12.1 Saturn (0.6mag) 04:12:34.15 +20:59:07.1 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:15:34.54 +00:09:22.9 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:27:22.42 -23:33:12.0 Pluto (14.5mag) 12:32:41.20 -07:41:54.8 Moon (-9.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Aug 16 04:54 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461268.90891378: 08:50:20.34 +18:13:15.5 Io (6.1mag) 08:50:20.86 +18:13:12.0 Europa (6.3mag) 08:50:28.96 +18:12:33.6 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:50:15.81 +18:13:32.1 Callisto (6.8mag) 08:47:44.17 +18:17:57.6 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:50:14.15 +18:13:42.1 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:47:21.02 +18:14:54.0 Elara (17.7mag) 08:54:24.65 +17:49:19.1 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:52:53.69 +18:25:41.9 Carme (19.0mag) 00:55:48.72 +03:07:45.5 Titan (8.4mag) 00:55:35.80 +03:07:55.6 Rhea (9.7mag) 00:56:06.94 +03:08:42.0 Iapetus (11.1mag) 00:55:51.08 +03:07:37.0 Hyperion (14.4mag) 00:54:50.21 +03:00:20.4 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 16 04:54 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461268.90891378: 19:38:58.63 -18:18:17.1 JWST 16:15:00.22 +47:06:52.4 Chandra 11:31:12.27 -60:42:58.3 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 16 04:54 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461268.90891378 -observatory V36 03:22:30.42 +18:01:29.8 17.6mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:00:10.00 -34:33:13.6 14.1mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:01:16.40 -69:13:33.4 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:11:51.39 +33:10:17.1 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 04:06:31.29 +40:44:22.7 17.2mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:31:47.05 +30:53:00.1 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:51:26.25 +26:23:42.4 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:29:10.17 +28:06:23.9 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:34:20.80 +05:18:33.2 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:14:06.47 -12:37:06.2 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:00:17.89 +64:58:55.8 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 15:40:35.00 -13:41:35.8 14.5mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:17:04.12 +31:43:24.2 15.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:05:58.66 +15:33:35.3 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:53:16.09 +43:24:55.6 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:58:26.49 +49:35:03.6 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:21:29.12 -12:54:16.0 15.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:01:18.48 +22:41:48.6 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 10:44:30.90 +20:22:14.4 17.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:03:18.01 +01:47:15.0 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:04:52.42 +76:59:18.6 16.6mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:09:35.83 +46:18:51.5 17.2mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:53:40.64 +09:22:36.5 17.4mag A/2026 E1 22:06:49.94 -30:27:10.0 7.0mag 10P/Tempel 11:33:57.73 -03:55:12.5 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 11:24:21.32 +01:57:44.9 17.3mag 63P/Wild 00:53:09.63 -05:47:45.5 15.4mag 65P/Gunn 05:53:52.66 +20:29:18.1 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 20:30:40.47 -24:25:31.2 17.6mag 84P/Giclas 03:07:58.00 +14:13:59.5 16.8mag 88P/Howell 08:16:20.83 +26:29:50.8 16.3mag 93P/Lovas 04:29:48.38 +20:04:14.9 17.4mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 06:23:22.94 +29:16:35.2 16.2mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 09:37:48.54 +25:12:35.8 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley 12:00:14.90 -13:23:05.7 17.2mag 124P/Mrkos 05:48:26.62 +21:07:03.8 16.0mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 06:42:18.18 +18:27:59.4 17.9mag 131P/Mueller 00:01:34.39 +03:16:24.2 17.5mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 03:15:44.55 -18:51:14.6 13.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 07:44:03.26 +38:05:30.4 16.0mag 162P/Siding Spring 12:29:00.49 +38:02:33.4 12.0mag 169P/NEAT 02:57:09.21 +09:31:44.8 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:46:26.70 -10:41:41.5 17.9mag 235P/LINEAR 20:17:57.25 -52:26:12.9 17.9mag 259P/Garradd 03:46:00.78 +28:31:59.0 15.3mag 260P/McNaught 07:29:53.08 +37:25:49.5 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:13:29.78 +02:13:37.2 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski 09:08:20.66 +17:58:10.5 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.3K Aug 16 04:54 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 16 04:54 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 16 04:54 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 23:37:50.618 -01:46:17.45 AT 2026wuz 2026-07-25.58 20.15 00:30:26.145 +29:31:04.56 AT 2026wuy 2026-07-23.54 21.23 23:43:45.878 +27:53:57.40 AT 2026wux 2026-07-27.51 20.99 17:05:21.182 +29:02:19.42 AT 2026wuw 2026-03-09.61 21.2 16:00:25.159 +52:39:29.32 AT 2026wuv 2026-05-24.44 21 15:12:38.490 +17:08:40.32 AT 2026wuu 2026-07-06.38 20.78 20:34:48.010 -30:46:06.82 AT 2026wut 2026-07-08.49 20.87 13:24:16.058 -23:32:48.97 AT 2026wus 2026-05-21.31 20.5 15:52:09.810 +21:23:36.58 AT 2026wur 2026-05-19.33 21.14 17:21:27.821 +31:45:59.75 AT 2026wuq 2026-07-24.44 20.99 16:06:39.962 -00:03:48.96 AT 2026wup 2026-07-08.37 20.6 23:36:31.132 -01:42:30.56 AT 2026wuo 2026-07-25.58 21.53 14:58:54.953 +20:56:59.36 AT 2026wun 2026-06-12.38 21.33 13:29:54.424 -08:02:17.84 AT 2026wum 2026-05-12.34 21.76 15:31:56.171 -23:07:56.50 AT 2026wul 2026-07-16.29 21.12 15:50:35.869 +16:13:29.04 AT 2026wuk 2026-06-08.46 20.66 14:46:52.387 +23:41:33.95 AT 2026wuj 2026-07-19.29 20.84 02:33:14.312 +23:53:11.23 AT 2026wui 2026-07-25.60 21.47 23:59:19.033 +30:37:28.65 AT 2026wuh 2026-07-23.54 21.33 16:12:22.633 +29:40:38.32 AT 2026wug 2026-05-17.56 21.06 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 16 04:54 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 94 C