This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.4056 2461268.9056 12.14 01:48:41.70 +17:04:58.2
141.99862 -43.65896 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 2.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.101 Helena -1 -1 1 12.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:48:41.70 +17:04:58.2: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:48:41.70 +17:04:58.2: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 16.4056* 01 48 41.70 +17 04 58.2 12.1 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461268.9056,12.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260816.4056 12.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.4056 2461268.9056 12.24 02:04:27.17 +12:18:56.1
149.46447 -46.76021 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.46 Hestia -0 -0 0 12.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 02:04:27.17 +12:18:56.1: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 02:04:27.17 +12:18:56.1: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 16.4056* 02 04 27.17 +12 18 56.1 12.2 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461268.9056,12.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260816.4056 12.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.4056 2461268.9056 12.71 01:46:12.59 +10:54:21.2
143.99960 -49.71215 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.124 Alkeste -1 -1 1 12.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:46:12.59 +10:54:21.2: 15.81 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:46:12.59 +10:54:21.2: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.81 +/- 0.26
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461268.9056,12.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260816.4056 12.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.4056 2461268.9056 13.36 01:42:01.83 +15:23:10.9
140.54210 -45.74835 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 2.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.212 Medea -0 0 0 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:42:01.83 +15:23:10.9: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:42:01.83 +15:23:10.9: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461268.9056,13.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260816.4056 13.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.4056 2461268.9056 14.12 01:54:08.86 +10:27:42.0
147.05786 -49.44994 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 2.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.167 Urda 0 0 0 14.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:54:08.86 +10:27:42.0: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:54:08.86 +10:27:42.0: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461268.9056,14.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260816.4056 14.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.4056 2461268.9056 14.28 01:49:52.48 +15:02:35.8
143.27076 -45.50813 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.295 Theresia -0 -0 0 14.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:49:52.48 +15:02:35.8: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:49:52.48 +15:02:35.8: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 16.4056* 01 49 52.48 +15 02 35.8 14.3 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461268.9056,14.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260816.4056 14.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.4056 2461268.9056 14.24 01:47:18.83 +11:52:57.2
143.90433 -48.70062 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1317 Silvretta -1 0 1 14.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:47:18.83 +11:52:57.2: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:47:18.83 +11:52:57.2: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 16.4056* 01 47 18.83 +11 52 57.2 14.2 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461268.9056,14.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260816.4056 14.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.4056 2461268.9056 14.47 01:37:48.80 +14:34:28.7
139.44086 -46.80517 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.517 Edith -1 -1 1 14.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:37:48.80 +14:34:28.7: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:37:48.80 +14:34:28.7: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461268.9056,14.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260816.4056 14.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.4056 2461268.9056 14.45 01:53:51.91 +13:42:20.2
145.22436 -46.44637 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 2.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.147 Protogeneia -0 -1 1 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:53:51.91 +13:42:20.2: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:53:51.91 +13:42:20.2: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 16.4056* 01 53 51.91 +13 42 20.2 14.4 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461268.9056,14.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260816.4056 14.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.69490819 23.12.2025 04:40:30.068 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
First image: 2461032.69490819 23.12.2025 04:40:30.068 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Last image: 2461268.90582447 16.08.2026 09:44:13.234 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7216
Objects passed selection criteria: 7211
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6912
Average stars matched: 6818.25 (98.6437 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233384 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 16 04:50:23 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.69490819 23.12.2025 04:40:30.068 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
First image: 2461032.69490819 23.12.2025 04:40:30.068 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Last image: 2461268.90582447 16.08.2026 09:44:13.234 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 201
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 11 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 38001
Objects passed selection criteria: 37909
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 35429.5
Average stars matched: 34690.8 (97.9149 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 260836 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 16 04:51:21 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461268.90529641
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:39.869 +14:00:12.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:45.099 +14:00:42.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:46:39.869 +14:00:12.31
Second-epoch image center 01:46:45.099 +14:00:42.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0227 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:44.241 +14:00:32.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:46:39.869 +14:00:12.31
Second-epoch image center 01:46:44.241 +14:00:32.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0185 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:46:45.099 +14:00:42.16
Second-epoch second image center 01:46:44.241 +14:00:32.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00439 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2h1yeIxv4C
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CapZ6if1cT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GENWwGTLqr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qvwwNOuB2O
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits and wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits and wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits and wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7679 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.3962 to 34.9286 deg, Dec +8.6498 to +19.2740 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.3962 to 34.9286 deg, Dec 8.6498 to 19.2740 deg
Loaded 4730 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3851 out of 4065 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4065 out of 7679 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.950100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.950100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7679 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.3962 to 34.9286 deg, Dec +8.6498 to +19.2740 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.3962 to 34.9286 deg, Dec 8.6498 to 19.2740 deg
Loaded 4730 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3851 out of 4065 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4065 out of 7679 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 6762 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.4566 to 34.9567 deg, Dec +8.6053 to +19.2739 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.4566 to 34.9567 deg, Dec 8.6053 to 19.2739 deg
Loaded 4732 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3812 out of 4016 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4016 out of 6762 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
2.0 pix Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
2.7 pix fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
2.7 pix fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
15.2 mag. Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.2h1yeIxv4C (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=549, bad_region=0, passed=7679
Got 7679 stars (including 7121 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7679 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4876 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.21"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.21"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22"
Excluding outliers - 4873 stars left (next iteration limit 5359)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits N_match=4873 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.237 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.223 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.217 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.200 n_q1=1261 n_q2=1216 n_q3=1199 n_q4=1197 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.365
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits -region wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CapZ6if1cT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=519, bad_region=0, passed=6762
Got 6762 stars (including 6236 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6762 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6762 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6762 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6762 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4878 stars left (next iteration limit 5365)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits N_match=4878 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.239 n_q1=1250 n_q2=1227 n_q3=1200 n_q4=1201 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.449
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits -region wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GENWwGTLqr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=315, bad_region=0, passed=6678
Got 6678 stars (including 6357 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6678 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6678 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6678 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6678 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4871 stars left (next iteration limit 5357)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=10.573 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.932 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.315 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.329 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.256 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.280 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4871 robust_rms_before=0.941 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.252 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.256 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.270 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.280
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.270 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits N_match=4871 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.256 n_q1=1198 n_q2=1173 n_q3=1227 n_q4=1273 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.043
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qvwwNOuB2O (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=327, bad_region=0, passed=6679
Got 6679 stars (including 6346 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6679 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4876 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4875 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4871 stars left (next iteration limit 5359)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=10.515 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.949 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.323 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.336 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.255 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.296 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4871 robust_rms_before=0.941 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.255 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.255 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.287 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.296
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.287 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits N_match=4871 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.234 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.251 n_q1=1194 n_q2=1172 n_q3=1230 n_q4=1275 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.142
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits sigma_overall=0.237 worst_q_ratio=1.365
ref2=Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits sigma_overall=0.294 worst_q_ratio=1.449
new1=fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits sigma_overall=0.265 worst_q_ratio=1.043
new2=fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits sigma_overall=0.263 worst_q_ratio=1.142
reference average sigma_overall=0.2655 worst_q_ratio=1.407
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188_astrometric_residuals.png (4873 matched stars from wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.21 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139_astrometric_residuals.png (4878 matched stars from wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101_astrometric_residuals.png (4871 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102_astrometric_residuals.png (4871 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 02:04:27.17 +12:18:56.1: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:48:41.70 +17:04:58.2: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:32:00.90 +12:54:29.0: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:42:57.87 +16:10:54.5: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:52:16.03 +15:47:07.8: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 02:04:15.27 +11:14:09.2: 11.85 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 02:04:27.17 +12:18:56.1: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:42:57.87 +16:10:54.5: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:52:16.03 +15:47:07.8: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:48:41.70 +17:04:58.2: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 02:04:15.27 +11:14:09.2: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:32:00.90 +12:54:29.0: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.86 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:52:16.03 +15:47:07.8: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4236 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:42:57.87 +16:10:54.5: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4477 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:04:15.27 +11:14:09.2: ref_mag=11.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0929 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:32:00.90 +12:54:29.0: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4726 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20215.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20228.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20213_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 20213_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20215_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
Preparing report for the candidate 20215_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20227_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 20227_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:10:13.48 +11:32:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20228_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
Preparing report for the candidate 20228_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20253_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 20253_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20257_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 20257_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20258_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 20258_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04646_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 04646_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:22:58.49 +12:52:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Psc-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
01:48:41.70 +17:04:58.2
02:04:27.17 +12:18:56.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:39.869 +14:00:12.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:45.099 +14:00:42.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:46:39.869 +14:00:12.31
Second-epoch image center 01:46:45.099 +14:00:42.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0227 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:44.241 +14:00:32.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:46:39.869 +14:00:12.31
Second-epoch image center 01:46:44.241 +14:00:32.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0185 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:46:45.099 +14:00:42.16
Second-epoch second image center 01:46:44.241 +14:00:32.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00439 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YNonfPI1FG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qhilOYiNJ4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dgJmRdBZAj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yiqJNdiaI8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits and wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits and wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits and wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 40639 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.3962 to 34.9791 deg, Dec +8.6321 to +19.2912 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.3962 to 34.9791 deg, Dec 8.6321 to 19.2912 deg
Loaded 4752 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3678 out of 4107 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4107 out of 40639 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.860050
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.860050
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 40639 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.3962 to 34.9791 deg, Dec +8.6321 to +19.2912 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.3962 to 34.9791 deg, Dec 8.6321 to 19.2912 deg
Loaded 4752 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3678 out of 4107 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4107 out of 40639 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 38153 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.4016 to 34.9977 deg, Dec +8.5904 to +19.2796 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.4016 to 34.9977 deg, Dec 8.5904 to 19.2796 deg
Loaded 4774 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3712 out of 4109 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4109 out of 38153 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 182 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
1.9 pix Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
2.6 pix fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
2.6 pix fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
15.4 mag. Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.YNonfPI1FG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1873, bad_region=4, passed=40626
Got 40626 stars (including 38681 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40626 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.21"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40626 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.21"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40626 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.21"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40626 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Excluding outliers - 4878 stars left (next iteration limit 5365)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits N_match=4878 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.229 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.218 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.217 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.197 n_q1=1241 n_q2=1253 n_q3=1190 n_q4=1194 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.309
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits -region wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qhilOYiNJ4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1585, bad_region=24, passed=38135
Got 38135 stars (including 36454 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38135 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38135 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38135 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38135 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.238 n_q1=1246 n_q2=1250 n_q3=1199 n_q4=1186 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.439
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits -region wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dgJmRdBZAj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1101, bad_region=36, passed=31915
Got 31915 stars (including 30743 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31915 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4872 stars left (next iteration limit 5359)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=10.604 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.198 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=0.318 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.335 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=0.253 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.278 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4872 robust_rms_before=0.940 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.254 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.253 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.265 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.278
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.265 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits N_match=4872 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.245 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.252 n_q1=1196 n_q2=1165 n_q3=1247 n_q4=1264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.070
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yiqJNdiaI8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1079, bad_region=37, passed=31995
Got 31995 stars (including 30836 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31995 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4869 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31995 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31995 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31995 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4869 stars left (next iteration limit 5355)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=10.541 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.195 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.321 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.332 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.252 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.288 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4869 robust_rms_before=0.939 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.254 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.252 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.281 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.288
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.281 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits N_match=4869 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.229 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.253 n_q1=1189 n_q2=1162 n_q3=1242 n_q4=1276 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.147
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_044606_TTUQ1b1x1_736492_fh5S0128/wcs_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:37:29.76 +18:35:27.4: 14.69 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:15:31.12 +14:30:09.2: 14.70 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:19:14.64 +14:03:17.1: 14.69 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:20:31.60 +09:22:58.7: 13.90 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:37:29.76 +18:35:27.4: 14.81 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:15:31.12 +14:30:09.2: 14.50 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:19:14.64 +14:03:17.1: 14.76 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:20:31.60 +09:22:58.7: 13.75 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:37:29.76 +18:35:27.4: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8715 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:15:31.12 +14:30:09.2: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7538 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:14.64 +14:03:17.1: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4187 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:31.60 +09:22:58.7: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8643 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:46:12.59 +10:54:21.2: 15.81 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:46:12.59 +10:54:21.2: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.81 +/- 0.26
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 01:46:12.59 +10:54:21.2: ref_mag=15.81 +/- 0.26 new_mean_mag=12.7140 delta=3.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:42:01.83 +15:23:10.9: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:42:01.83 +15:23:10.9: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:54:08.86 +10:27:42.0: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 02:01:36.18 +14:32:26.9: 14.10 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:49:52.48 +15:02:35.8: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:54:08.86 +10:27:42.0: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 02:01:36.18 +14:32:26.9: 14.18 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:49:52.48 +15:02:35.8: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:01:36.18 +14:32:26.9: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0966 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:47:18.83 +11:52:57.2: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:37:48.80 +14:34:28.7: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:47:18.83 +11:52:57.2: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:53:51.91 +13:42:20.2: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:37:48.80 +14:34:28.7: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:53:51.91 +13:42:20.2: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:30:25.12 +16:56:06.2: 14.88 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:30:25.12 +16:56:06.2: 14.90 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:30:25.12 +16:56:06.2: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7678 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:22:07.63 +10:45:44.0: 15.21 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:22:07.63 +10:45:44.0: 14.87 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:22:07.63 +10:45:44.0: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6896 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:36:12.95 +12:56:29.2: 15.35 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:36:12.95 +12:56:29.2: 15.40 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:36:12.95 +12:56:29.2: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8445 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:34:32.85 +14:41:34.5: 15.31 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:34:32.85 +14:41:34.5: 15.12 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:34:32.85 +14:41:34.5: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8646 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-40-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits at 01:59:33.74 +14:40:22.4: 15.52 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_21-41-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0139.fits at 01:59:33.74 +14:40:22.4: 15.67 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.58 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:59:33.74 +14:40:22.4: ref_mag=15.58 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9104 delta=0.67 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51902.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52018.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52263.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52297.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52347.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52372.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52378.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51645_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51645_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51648_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51648_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51654_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51654_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51656_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51656_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51658_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51658_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51661_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51661_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:45:28.81 +17:08:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51665_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51665_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51666_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51666_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51720_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51720_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51754_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51754_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51765_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51765_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51777_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51777_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51787_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51787_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51795_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51795_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:48:41.70 +17:04:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51804_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51804_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51808_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51808_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51809_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51809_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:04:27.17 +12:18:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51810_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51810_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51815_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51815_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51825_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51825_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51857_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51857_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51878_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51878_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51890_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51890_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51891_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51891_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51902_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
Preparing report for the candidate 51902_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51929_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51929_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51936_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51936_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51941_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51941_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51949_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51949_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51953_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51953_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51967_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51967_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51971_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51971_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51975_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51975_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51978_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51978_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51986_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51986_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51992_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51992_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51993_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51993_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51997_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 51997_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52018_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
Preparing report for the candidate 52018_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52021_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52021_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52043_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52043_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52044_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52044_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52048_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52048_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52051_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52051_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52054_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52054_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52056_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52056_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52078_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52078_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52085_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52085_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52090_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52090_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52116_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52116_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52120_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52120_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52126_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52126_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:39:44.52 +16:26:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52130_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52130_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:48:50.94 +16:23:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52134_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52134_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52143_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52143_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52145_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52145_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52147_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52147_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52163_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52163_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52180_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52180_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52182_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52182_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52183_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52183_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52192_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52192_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52198_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52198_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52212_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52212_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52214_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52214_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52220_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52220_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52221_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52221_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52223_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52223_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52227_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52227_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52228_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52228_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52235_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52235_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52236_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52236_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52237_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52237_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52240_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52240_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52249_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52249_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52253_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52253_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52256_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52256_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52259_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52259_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52263_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
Preparing report for the candidate 52263_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52277_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52277_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52281_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52281_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52283_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52283_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52286_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52286_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52287_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52287_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52288_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52288_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:43:42.65 +12:53:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52290_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52290_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52297_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
Preparing report for the candidate 52297_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52298_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52298_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52309_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52309_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52319_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52319_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52325_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52325_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52332_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52332_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52338_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52338_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52339_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52339_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52343_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52343_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52347_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
Preparing report for the candidate 52347_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52348_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52348_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52350_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52350_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52353_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52353_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52358_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52358_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52359_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52359_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:07:33.17 +12:06:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52363_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52363_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52372_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
Preparing report for the candidate 52372_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52375_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52375_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52378_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
Preparing report for the candidate 52378_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52379_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52379_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52381_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52381_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52382_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52382_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52384_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52384_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52385_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52385_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52386_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52386_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52392_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52392_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52405_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52405_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52406_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52406_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52408_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52408_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52411_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52411_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52420_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52420_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52421_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52421_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52423_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52423_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52425_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52425_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52430_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52430_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52434_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52434_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52436_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52436_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52437_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52437_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52438_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52438_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52445_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52445_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52446_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52446_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52461_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52461_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52465_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52465_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:11:10.22 +17:16:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52469_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52469_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52472_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52472_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52473_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52473_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52477_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52477_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52480_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52480_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52482_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52482_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52486_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52486_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52494_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52494_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52498_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52498_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52511_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52511_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52517_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52517_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52519_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52519_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52523_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52523_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52524_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52524_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52525_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52525_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52526_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52526_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52527_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52527_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52529_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52529_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52530_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52530_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52532_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52532_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52540_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52540_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52550_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52550_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52557_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52557_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52558_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52558_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52563_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52563_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52565_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52565_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52566_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52566_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52576_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52576_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52579_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52579_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52584_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52584_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52585_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52585_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52587_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52587_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52589_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52589_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52592_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52592_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52602_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52602_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52607_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52607_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52610_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52610_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52611_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52611_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52616_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52616_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52617_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52617_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52619_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52619_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52622_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52622_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52623_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52623_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52624_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52624_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52636_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52636_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52638_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52638_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52644_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52644_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52645_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52645_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52653_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 52653_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29370_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 29370_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:00:56.08 +09:45:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04532_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 04532_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17273_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 17273_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31656_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102
The candidate 31656_fd_Psc-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0102 did not pass the final checks
