fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 16.34715 | 2461268.84715 | 12.91 | 11:43:48.48 +75:42:39.6 | 5323 4282 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 16.34775 | 2461268.84775 | 13.10 | 11:43:46.72 +75:42:33.5 | 5323 4282 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits |
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.3475 2461268.8475 13.01 11:43:47.60 +75:42:36.5
128.36597 40.69631 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.9" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:43:47.60 +75:42:36.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 11:43:47.60 +75:42:36.5: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:43:47.60 +75:42:36.5: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 16.34715 | 2461268.84715 | 13.74 | 10:30:47.48 +80:51:30.1 | 7029 0898 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 16.34775 | 2461268.84775 | 13.63 | 10:30:47.81 +80:51:23.8 | 7029 0898 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits |
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.3475 2461268.8475 13.69 10:30:47.65 +80:51:27.0
129.30326 34.45783 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.3" and 0.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:30:47.65 +80:51:27.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 10:30:47.65 +80:51:27.0: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 10:30:47.65 +80:51:27.0: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5 FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3 ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr) INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: Cam-05-Q1b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting Cam-05-Q1b1x1 ########### Processing Cam-05-Q1b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 901591 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 901591 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits_preview.png'
Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
renamed 'Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits_preview.png'
Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 575.4353 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 517.8945 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1270.0649 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 279.7567 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1267.5410 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 281.0133 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.20714 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.004 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 26.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-16T03:19:43.9607408' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-16T08:19:43.9607408' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61268.347036574 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-16T08:19:53.8671172' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61268.3471512385 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 180.00067441243 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 77.4995138829451 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 21.3683333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 357.077222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.72701524058621 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29509 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29509 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 52.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 905.38 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 26.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 32.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 14.801184 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 9.400752 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits :) Spent 0.486710 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 26.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-16T03:20:35.5143559' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-16T08:20:35.5143559' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61268.347633264 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-16T08:20:45.4158059' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61268.3477478586 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 180.000674561186 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 77.4995139269063 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 21.3591666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 357.126944444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.72811384501939 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29509 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29509 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 52.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 905.38 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 26.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 32.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 14.801184 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 9.400752 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits :) Spent 0.477911 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461268.84715231 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Image size: 941.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits Image size: 941.2'x627.6' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:01.643 +77:29:42.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 Second-epoch image center 12:00:01.643 +77:29:42.61 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0054 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Image size: 941.2'x627.6' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:59.246 +77:29:34.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 Second-epoch image center 11:59:59.246 +77:29:34.45 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0070 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 12:00:01.643 +77:29:42.61 Second-epoch second image center 11:59:59.246 +77:29:34.45 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00313 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.A6pSbvpPtI Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SESgwDJqbN Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5d5IQDaT0T Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits &> /tmp/tmp.y2qQGMBwIv Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 8935 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2203 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2203 deg Loaded 11837 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5410 out of 5718 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5718 out of 8935 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.862250 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.862250 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 8935 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2203 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2203 deg Loaded 11837 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5410 out of 5718 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5718 out of 8935 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (aperture=6.2) Read 9444 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.7167 to 226.3162 deg, Dec +70.5552 to +82.7628 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.7167 to 226.3162 deg, Dec 70.5552 to 82.7628 deg Loaded 10553 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3703 out of 3846 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3846 out of 9444 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (aperture=6.6) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 2.3 pix Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 2.0 pix fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits 2.0 pix fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.3 mag. Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 15.2 mag. Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 13.1 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits 13.1 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.1 (SNR ) 10.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.A6pSbvpPtI (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=680, bad_region=0, passed=8935 Got 8935 stars (including 8237 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8935 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4901 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8935 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8935 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8935 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4901 stars left (next iteration limit 5391) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits N_match=4901 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=1059 n_q2=1199 n_q3=1313 n_q4=1330 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.299 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.SESgwDJqbN (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=593, bad_region=0, passed=9444 Got 9444 stars (including 8840 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9444 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9444 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9444 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9444 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5384) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.311 n_q1=1140 n_q2=1167 n_q3=1319 n_q4=1270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.150 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.5d5IQDaT0T (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=82, bad_region=0, passed=1936 Got 1936 stars (including 1851 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1936 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1799 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1783 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1923 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1798 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1922 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1922 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 1794 stars left (next iteration limit 1974) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1794 robust_rms=9.577 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=18.036 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1794 robust_rms=0.464 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.515 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1794 robust_rms=0.359 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.388 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1794 robust_rms_before=0.819 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.399 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.359 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.443 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.388 verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits Image size: 941.3'x627.6' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:01.461 +77:29:42.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ### ### Converted positions of 1936 stars ### 'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1755940.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log' SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.819 -> 0.359 arcsec) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits N_match=1794 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.380 n_q1=547 n_q2=696 n_q3=252 n_q4=299 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.084 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.y2qQGMBwIv (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=88, bad_region=0, passed=2003 Got 2003 stars (including 1913 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2003 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1844 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1991 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1992 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1992 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 1854 stars left (next iteration limit 2040) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1854 robust_rms=9.063 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.647 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1854 robust_rms=0.468 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.500 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1854 robust_rms=0.363 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.415 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1854 robust_rms_before=0.835 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.392 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.363 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.438 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.415 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.438 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits N_match=1854 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.420 n_q1=579 n_q2=716 n_q3=247 n_q4=312 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.170 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits sigma_overall=0.355 worst_q_ratio=1.299 ref2=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits sigma_overall=0.320 worst_q_ratio=1.150 new1=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.084 new2=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits sigma_overall=0.398 worst_q_ratio=1.170 reference average sigma_overall=0.3375 worst_q_ratio=1.2245 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284_astrometric_residuals.png (4901 matched stars from wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280_astrometric_residuals.png (4896 matched stars from wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019_astrometric_residuals.png (1794 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020_astrometric_residuals.png (1854 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Image size: 941.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits Image size: 941.3'x627.6' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:01.461 +77:29:42.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 Second-epoch image center 12:00:01.461 +77:29:42.37 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0053 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Image size: 941.2'x627.6' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:59.246 +77:29:34.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 Second-epoch image center 11:59:59.246 +77:29:34.45 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0070 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 12:00:01.461 +77:29:42.37 Second-epoch second image center 11:59:59.246 +77:29:34.45 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00297 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PRLGUYvoU6 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits &> /tmp/tmp.odC3rQc0u0 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kPtLepuKN2 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZIPsnvddD6 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 51561 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2318 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2318 deg Loaded 12006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5102 out of 5807 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5807 out of 51561 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.749000 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.749000 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 51561 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2318 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2318 deg Loaded 12006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5102 out of 5807 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5807 out of 51561 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (aperture=4.8) Read 48477 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.3942 to 226.7803 deg, Dec +70.4537 to +82.7794 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.3942 to 226.7803 deg, Dec 70.4537 to 82.7794 deg Loaded 10790 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3498 out of 3909 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3909 out of 48477 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (aperture=5.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 89 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 2.2 pix Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 1.9 pix fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits 1.9 pix fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 15.4 mag. Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 13.5 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits 13.5 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 13.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.PRLGUYvoU6 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=2563, bad_region=1, passed=51537 Got 51537 stars (including 48894 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51537 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51537 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51537 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51537 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=1055 n_q2=1197 n_q3=1288 n_q4=1356 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.odC3rQc0u0 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=2481, bad_region=0, passed=48460 Got 48460 stars (including 45910 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48460 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4888 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5376) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=1139 n_q2=1198 n_q3=1281 n_q4=1272 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.116 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.kPtLepuKN2 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=344, bad_region=22, passed=15482 Got 15482 stars (including 15091 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15482 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4869 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4866 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15482 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4869 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15482 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15482 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 4866 stars left (next iteration limit 5352) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=9.485 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.177 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=0.528 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.586 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=0.419 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.464 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4866 robust_rms_before=0.421 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.422 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.419 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.453 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.464 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.453 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits N_match=4866 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.447 n_q1=1556 n_q2=1841 n_q3=658 n_q4=811 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.071 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.ZIPsnvddD6 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=299, bad_region=25, passed=15666 Got 15666 stars (including 15308 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15666 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4855 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15666 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15666 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15666 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 4855 stars left (next iteration limit 5340) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=9.434 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.623 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=0.530 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.548 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=0.418 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.467 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4855 robust_rms_before=0.849 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.422 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.418 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.460 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.467 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.460 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits N_match=4855 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.440 n_q1=1566 n_q2=1808 n_q3=668 n_q4=813 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 11:45:27.54 +81:51:49.2: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 11:27:02.33 +79:37:52.7: 10.52 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:27:02.33 +79:37:52.7: 10.44 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:45:27.54 +81:51:49.2: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.48 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:27:02.33 +79:37:52.7: ref_mag=10.48 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6528 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:45:27.54 +81:51:49.2: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8884 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 13:10:12.09 +80:00:35.1: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 12:11:27.36 +81:25:47.3: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 11:00:26.53 +77:42:07.5: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 13:10:12.09 +80:00:35.1: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:10:12.09 +80:00:35.1: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6180 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:11:27.36 +81:25:47.3: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:00:26.53 +77:42:07.5: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:11:27.36 +81:25:47.3: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8041 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:00:26.53 +77:42:07.5: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5241 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 13:10:19.32 +80:00:29.9: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 13:10:19.32 +80:00:29.9: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:10:19.32 +80:00:29.9: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8682 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 11:43:47.60 +75:42:36.5: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 10:30:47.65 +80:51:27.0: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:43:47.60 +75:42:36.5: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 10:30:47.65 +80:51:27.0: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out69881.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out69896.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69541_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69541_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checksRejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69544_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69544_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 13.21 13:20:24.62 +79:12:20.1 2656 1640 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 16.34715 2461268.84715 12.97 11:45:27.10 +81:51:49.6 5267 0577 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69545_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69545_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.82 11:45:27.98 +81:51:48.8 5266 0576 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits **** FOUND 10:45:10.41 +78:29:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69548_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69548_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.48 10:45:10.51 +78:29:20.3 7058 2380 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 16.34715 2461268.84715 10.65 11:27:02.40 +79:37:52.8 5764 1906 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69558_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69558_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 10.66 11:27:02.26 +79:37:52.6 5763 1905 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69564_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69564_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 9.11 12:26:16.88 +75:27:38.2 3725 4297 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69565_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69565_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 10.14 12:22:36.96 +79:38:20.2 4262 1839 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69566_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69566_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 9.63 12:41:00.88 +74:47:16.3 3083 4578 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69573_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69573_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 10.47 09:50:20.34 +78:34:33.8 8582 1727 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69582_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69582_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 9.71 12:07:46.33 +72:58:18.9 4273 5886 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69590_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69590_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 10.21 13:21:34.77 +74:31:46.6 1492 4215 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69592_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69592_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 10.28 11:43:29.22 +73:49:04.0 5342 5422 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69595_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69595_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 10.87 14:04:59.59 +78:11:26.5 1196 1536 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69600_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69600_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 11.33 12:09:32.59 +82:35:23.0 4798 0111 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69617_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69617_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 11.24 11:27:49.01 +79:57:41.1 5727 1708 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69620_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69620_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 11.23 10:09:29.03 +74:12:12.2 9120 4411 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69627_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69627_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 11.74 12:48:17.21 +80:33:33.5 3730 1155 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69652_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69652_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 10.77 12:02:11.59 +72:24:32.4 4494 6247 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69653_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69653_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.08 14:23:31.42 +78:36:04.0 0884 0997 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69655_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69655_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.08 13:59:45.45 +79:22:20.8 1723 1026 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69658_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69658_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.13 14:37:35.92 +79:44:57.8 1029 0203 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69659_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69659_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.35 09:58:19.75 +79:14:27.9 8188 1476 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69662_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69662_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.52 12:15:35.72 +82:30:06.9 4674 0150 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69680_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69680_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 11.65 13:51:32.61 +74:21:21.1 0349 3757 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69686_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69686_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 11.33 13:41:55.04 +72:50:25.1 0250 4763 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69687_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69687_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 11.52 13:43:13.41 +73:19:14.1 0341 4478 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits **** FOUND 13:11:43.54 +80:27:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69690_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69690_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.50 13:11:43.42 +80:27:50.4 3158 1025 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69694_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69694_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.14 09:59:33.87 +75:34:00.8 9133 3495 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69696_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69696_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 11.76 11:51:36.75 +74:38:20.8 5014 4923 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits **** FOUND 14:33:05.46 +79:38:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69697_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69697_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.54 14:33:05.56 +79:38:45.0 1080 0333 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69699_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69699_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 11.90 13:39:53.66 +76:33:09.0 1400 2814 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69701_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69701_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 11.94 13:49:33.44 +75:21:39.9 0732 3271 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69704_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69704_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 11.56 13:49:01.46 +73:29:32.7 0171 4264 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69706_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69706_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 11.93 14:16:09.30 +76:29:07.8 0284 2160 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits **** FOUND 09:45:10.64 +78:07:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69711_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69711_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.58 09:45:10.94 +78:07:20.8 8855 1891 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69712_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69712_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 11.82 11:45:40.12 +73:34:29.3 5250 5569 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69713_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69713_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.36 13:50:54.99 +79:40:04.6 2026 1004 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69719_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69719_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.51 09:43:28.19 +77:16:29.2 9160 2311 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69720_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69720_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.49 14:09:25.62 +80:33:23.3 1913 0287 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 16.34715 2461268.84715 12.61 13:10:12.45 +80:00:34.4 3097 1297 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69724_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69724_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.62 13:10:11.73 +80:00:35.8 3096 1295 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69725_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69725_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.61 10:07:17.76 +74:41:45.7 9081 4101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69726_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69726_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.29 14:20:33.01 +77:57:08.7 0711 1363 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69727_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69727_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.06 13:55:16.33 +77:06:36.5 1105 2257 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69729_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69729_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.66 14:14:07.32 +78:46:45.4 1175 1084 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69731_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69731_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.63 10:23:32.74 +79:36:45.8 7451 1547 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 16.34715 2461268.84715 12.51 11:00:26.38 +77:42:06.0 6700 2949 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69733_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69733_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.55 11:00:26.67 +77:42:09.0 6698 2947 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69734_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69734_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.07 14:00:47.63 +74:51:44.8 0193 3299 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 16.34715 2461268.84715 12.80 12:11:27.54 +81:25:46.8 4683 0808 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69736_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69736_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.81 12:11:27.18 +81:25:47.8 4682 0806 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69738_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69738_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.51 09:58:19.74 +75:48:49.2 9109 3340 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69740_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69740_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 11.84 12:21:29.28 +74:21:29.0 3801 4983 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits **** FOUND 10:59:54.93 +77:47:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69748_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69748_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.35 10:59:55.07 +77:47:35.5 6704 2891 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69749_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69749_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.56 14:00:01.22 +77:23:49.4 1063 2025 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69754_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69754_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.05 12:21:40.41 +75:16:52.9 3880 4432 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69758_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69758_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 11.89 12:33:38.17 +73:06:38.1 3159 5634 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69760_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69760_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 11.75 12:12:59.16 +72:54:40.4 4039 5898 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69778_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69778_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.95 11:25:08.24 +82:19:53.2 5676 0274 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69786_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69786_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.69 10:06:03.36 +78:58:42.0 8054 1715 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69790_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69790_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 13.16 14:29:08.98 +79:30:27.5 1108 0468 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69806_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69806_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.37 10:30:15.95 +74:57:16.4 8165 4279 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69813_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69813_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.17 11:29:50.97 +74:43:58.0 5879 4851 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69818_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69818_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.69 11:32:41.83 +80:05:17.6 5595 1640 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 16.34715 2461268.84715 12.97 13:10:18.76 +80:00:31.1 3094 1296 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-19-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69821_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69821_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.81 13:10:19.87 +80:00:28.8 3093 1295 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69822_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69822_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.60 13:38:10.37 +75:20:01.1 1110 3496 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69828_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69828_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 13.05 10:27:23.00 +79:15:59.9 7420 1780 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69835_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69835_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 13.05 10:26:39.77 +75:17:17.9 8233 4043 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69838_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69838_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 13.59 13:04:24.57 +81:57:36.8 3630 0234 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69861_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69861_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.85 12:30:32.08 +78:13:25.0 3887 2637 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69866_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69866_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.91 10:29:54.28 +75:46:06.7 8022 3807 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69867_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69867_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.51 13:13:06.80 +75:44:18.9 2079 3664 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69870_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69870_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 13.29 10:24:07.19 +80:17:12.9 7298 1169 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69873_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69873_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 13.10 09:50:06.88 +79:34:18.8 8302 1192 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69876_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69876_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.62 10:30:57.18 +75:21:17.5 8063 4057 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69877_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69877_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.77 12:28:09.51 +77:26:29.3 3873 3113 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69881_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 Preparing report for the candidate 69881_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69885_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69885_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.80 10:35:12.08 +75:34:01.4 7869 3983 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69886_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69886_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.31 13:19:14.45 +74:05:45.5 1476 4494 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69888_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69888_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.64 12:39:09.91 +76:21:27.4 3371 3674 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69896_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 Preparing report for the candidate 69896_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69899_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69899_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 13.84 10:52:44.09 +81:19:55.8 6456 0761 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69900_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69900_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 13.27 12:57:58.75 +78:55:51.7 3200 2021 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69903_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69903_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 12.76 12:54:53.66 +75:44:23.7 2721 3885 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 69905_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 69905_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 13.38 11:34:10.70 +79:23:48.9 5576 2058 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23383_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 23383_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 13.21 11:41:40.62 +77:39:03.5 5384 3114 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits **** FOUND 14:08:49.68 +77:32:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 61687_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 61687_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 6.62 14:08:49.75 +77:32:52.8 0871 1786 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits **** FOUND 13:26:07.99 +72:23:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 43932_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 43932_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 6.54 13:26:07.97 +72:23:29.4 0775 5324 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 18759_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 18759_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 13.35 12:23:19.16 +81:07:55.3 4389 0947 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22862_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 22862_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 11.50 13:55:27.79 +76:37:03.1 0941 2507 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits **** FOUND 12:12:11.74 +77:37:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 11227_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 11227_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 6.91 12:12:11.67 +77:37:00.9 4401 3086 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits **** FOUND 12:18:49.67 +75:09:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 25864_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 The candidate 25864_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 6.78 12:18:49.80 +75:09:40.1 3977 4520 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits **** FOUND 10:35:05.72 +75:42:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 17s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 11:43:47.60 +75:42:36.5 10:30:47.65 +80:51:27.0 ########### Completed Cam-05-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 11:43:47.60 +75:42:36.5 10:30:47.65 +80:51:27.0 ################################################################################### 11:43:47.60 +75:42:36.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) 10:30:47.65 +80:51:27.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' 10:30:47.65 +80:51:27.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) 11:43:47.60 +75:42:36.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) 10:30:47.65 +80:51:27.0 -- not a known variable star 11:43:47.60 +75:42:36.5 -- not a known variable star Found 2 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 2 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 10:30:47.65 +80:51:27.0 11:43:47.60 +75:42:36.5 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461268.84715231 -observatory V36 08:56:59.41 +18:28:12.7 Mercury (-1.4mag) 12:30:39.45 -04:58:02.7 Venus (-4.4mag) 06:12:45.28 +23:42:29.3 Mars (1.3mag) 08:50:12.60 +18:13:46.3 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:55:38.63 +03:08:15.9 Saturn (0.6mag) 04:12:33.82 +20:59:06.2 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:15:34.81 +00:09:24.8 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:27:22.76 -23:33:10.7 Pluto (14.5mag) 12:28:36.79 -07:20:26.2 Moon (-9.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Aug 16 03:22 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461268.84715231: 08:50:15.78 +18:13:33.8 Io (6.1mag) 08:50:18.53 +18:13:20.2 Europa (6.3mag) 08:50:26.21 +18:12:43.8 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:50:13.14 +18:13:41.8 Callisto (6.8mag) 08:47:40.88 +18:18:07.9 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:50:10.72 +18:13:55.4 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:47:17.69 +18:15:05.0 Elara (17.7mag) 08:54:21.34 +17:49:33.3 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:52:50.63 +18:25:53.6 Carme (19.0mag) 00:55:49.03 +03:07:48.7 Titan (8.4mag) 00:55:35.82 +03:08:00.2 Rhea (9.7mag) 00:56:07.29 +03:08:45.0 Iapetus (11.1mag) 00:55:51.39 +03:07:40.4 Hyperion (14.4mag) 00:54:50.76 +03:00:24.6 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 16 03:22 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461268.84715231: 19:38:49.90 -18:22:03.0 JWST 16:01:24.87 +48:47:20.7 Chandra 10:48:04.25 -58:52:20.7 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 16 03:22 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461268.84715231 -observatory V36 03:22:26.71 +18:01:13.1 17.6mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:00:10.41 -34:33:16.7 14.1mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:01:13.07 -69:13:23.8 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:11:50.53 +33:10:12.0 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 04:06:21.93 +40:43:08.7 17.2mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:31:50.23 +30:53:17.6 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:51:22.75 +26:23:46.3 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:29:06.69 +28:06:33.5 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:34:18.30 +05:18:33.3 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:14:05.58 -12:36:56.8 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:00:22.45 +64:59:27.8 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 15:40:37.82 -13:41:15.7 14.5mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:17:00.14 +31:43:13.4 15.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:05:58.93 +15:33:37.2 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:53:20.33 +43:24:50.9 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:58:32.16 +49:34:57.3 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:21:26.37 -12:54:16.6 15.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:01:16.30 +22:42:28.6 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 10:44:25.48 +20:22:29.4 17.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:03:15.51 +01:47:30.9 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:04:49.88 +76:59:44.4 16.6mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:09:35.36 +46:18:48.6 17.2mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:53:37.41 +09:22:15.2 17.4mag A/2026 E1 22:06:46.80 -30:25:54.6 7.0mag 10P/Tempel 11:33:55.39 -03:54:57.9 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 11:24:13.73 +01:58:57.6 17.3mag 63P/Wild 00:53:10.45 -05:47:34.8 15.4mag 65P/Gunn 05:53:44.51 +20:29:25.4 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 20:30:43.75 -24:25:09.0 17.6mag 84P/Giclas 03:07:55.24 +14:13:46.5 16.8mag 88P/Howell 08:16:11.78 +26:30:23.5 16.3mag 93P/Lovas 04:29:37.55 +20:02:46.9 17.4mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 06:23:10.87 +29:17:07.7 16.2mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 09:37:39.81 +25:13:16.2 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley 12:00:07.24 -13:21:42.0 17.2mag 124P/Mrkos 05:48:21.35 +21:07:06.2 16.0mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 06:42:12.05 +18:28:12.0 17.9mag 131P/Mueller 00:01:35.51 +03:16:29.4 17.5mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 03:15:47.59 -18:51:22.5 13.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 07:43:50.83 +38:05:26.0 16.0mag 162P/Siding Spring 12:30:05.14 +38:06:52.6 12.0mag 169P/NEAT 02:57:03.36 +09:31:47.3 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:46:24.19 -10:41:25.1 17.9mag 235P/LINEAR 20:17:58.92 -52:26:33.3 17.9mag 259P/Garradd 03:45:50.09 +28:30:29.8 15.3mag 260P/McNaught 07:29:42.08 +37:25:59.7 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:13:28.21 +02:14:02.3 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski 09:08:17.27 +17:58:21.6 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.3K Aug 16 03:22 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 16 03:22 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 16 03:22 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 15:52:09.810 +21:23:36.58 AT 2026wur 2026-05-19.33 21.14 17:21:27.821 +31:45:59.75 AT 2026wuq 2026-07-24.44 20.99 16:06:39.962 -00:03:48.96 AT 2026wup 2026-07-08.37 20.6 23:36:31.132 -01:42:30.56 AT 2026wuo 2026-07-25.58 21.53 14:58:54.953 +20:56:59.36 AT 2026wun 2026-06-12.38 21.33 13:29:54.424 -08:02:17.84 AT 2026wum 2026-05-12.34 21.76 15:31:56.171 -23:07:56.50 AT 2026wul 2026-07-16.29 21.12 15:50:35.869 +16:13:29.04 AT 2026wuk 2026-06-08.46 20.66 14:46:52.387 +23:41:33.95 AT 2026wuj 2026-07-19.29 20.84 02:33:14.312 +23:53:11.23 AT 2026wui 2026-07-25.60 21.47 23:59:19.033 +30:37:28.65 AT 2026wuh 2026-07-23.54 21.33 16:12:22.633 +29:40:38.32 AT 2026wug 2026-05-17.56 21.06 22:44:11.171 +19:47:25.41 AT 2026wuf 2026-06-22.52 21.62 18:17:56.544 +19:41:21.89 SN 2026wue 2026-08-02.91 19.16 21:01:30.094 -22:58:14.18 AT 2026wud 2026-08-02.45 20.19 17:15:36.662 +19:40:23.08 AT 2026wuc 2026-08-02.89 19.57 21:28:21.020 -26:47:22.51 AT 2026wub 2026-08-01.60 19.12 22:35:35.158 -48:27:31.72 AT 2026wua 2026-07-27.55 19.31 13:33:02.514 +37:11:45.73 AT 2026wtz 2026-08-02.28 17.867 23:09:39.462 -49:07:04.71 AT 2026wty 2026-07-20.06 19.281 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 16 03:22 tns_transients_list.txt Discovery image 3 2026 08 16.34775 2461268.84775 6.53 10:35:05.73 +75:42:48.3 7847 3897 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032117_TTUQ1b1x1_1747146_hZOkoXwq/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-20-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
