fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 16.32683 | 2461268.82683 | 13.82 | 03:37:45.55 +16:59:15.5 | 5448 4966 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 16.32733 | 2461268.82733 | 13.88 | 03:37:45.59 +16:59:16.8 | 5450 4971 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits |
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.3271 2461268.8271 13.85 03:37:45.57 +16:59:16.2
170.20581 -30.22926 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 5.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
62 Erato -0 1 1 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:37:45.57 +16:59:16.2: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:37:45.57 +16:59:16.2: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 16.32683 | 2461268.82683 | 14.03 | 03:18:54.20 +11:29:45.3 | 2613 1700 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 16.32733 | 2461268.82733 | 13.99 | 03:18:53.97 +11:29:46.3 | 2614 1705 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits |
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.3271 2461268.8271 14.01 03:18:54.08 +11:29:45.8
170.63683 -37.36324 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.5" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
1620 Geographos 4 -5 6 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:18:54.08 +11:29:45.8: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:18:54.08 +11:29:45.8: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5 FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3 ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr) INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: Tau-05-Q2b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting Tau-05-Q2b1x1 ########### Processing Tau-05-Q2b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 902839 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 902839 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits_preview.png'
Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
renamed 'Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits_preview.png'
Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 561.0491 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 523.9986 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1576.0292 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 418.6203 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1573.8909 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 418.2105 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.80908 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 26.5499992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 26.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-16T02:50:27.8512645' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-16T07:50:27.8512645' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61268.3267112384 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-16T07:50:37.7545562' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61268.3268258567 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 53.331145286137 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 13.9995200192384 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 21.5861111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 87.1033333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.7011906104026 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Tau-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '03 33 20' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20440 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20440 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.5499992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.5499992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 50.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 905.32 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 26.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 53.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 20.201616 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 14.401152 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/d_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits :) Spent 0.465347 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/d_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 26.5599994659424 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 26.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-16T02:51:11.7439602' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-16T07:51:11.7439602' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61268.3272192478 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-16T07:51:21.6501272' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61268.3273339123 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 53.3311452334623 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 13.9995200076321 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 21.7388888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 87.2025 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.68338412649851 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Tau-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '03 33 20' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20440 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20440 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.5599994659424 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.5599994659424 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 50.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 905.32 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 26.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 53.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 20.201616 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 14.401152 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/d_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits :) Spent 0.468002 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/d_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461268.82682698 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Image size: 938.5'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 03:33:24.172 +14:02:45.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59 Second-epoch image center 03:33:24.172 +14:02:45.20 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0501 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits Image size: 938.5'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 03:33:23.499 +14:02:15.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59 Second-epoch image center 03:33:23.499 +14:02:15.90 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0415 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 03:33:24.172 +14:02:45.20 Second-epoch second image center 03:33:23.499 +14:02:15.90 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00858 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IjPZ2SNwth Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JcitT6fCAp Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JjRjTdfIUm Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6FkPFi6K85 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 7716 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec +8.6205 to +19.2872 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec 8.6205 to 19.2872 deg Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3534 out of 3742 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3742 out of 7716 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.950750 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.950750 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 7716 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec +8.6205 to +19.2872 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec 8.6205 to 19.2872 deg Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3534 out of 3742 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3742 out of 7716 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (aperture=6.0) Read 7722 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0650 to 61.6427 deg, Dec +8.6182 to +19.2791 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0650 to 61.6427 deg, Dec 8.6182 to 19.2791 deg Loaded 4354 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3534 out of 3736 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3736 out of 7722 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (aperture=6.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 2.0 pix Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 2.3 pix fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 2.3 pix fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 15.4 mag. Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 13.9 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 13.9 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.IjPZ2SNwth (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=551, bad_region=1716, passed=7716 Got 7716 stars (including 5573 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7716 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6339 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6339 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6339 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4894 stars left (next iteration limit 5383) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits N_match=4894 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.268 n_q1=1724 n_q2=1005 n_q3=1514 n_q4=651 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.261 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.JcitT6fCAp (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=536, bad_region=1716, passed=7722 Got 7722 stars (including 5589 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7722 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6342 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6342 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6342 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5386) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=1731 n_q2=1006 n_q3=1513 n_q4=648 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.264 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.JjRjTdfIUm (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=181, bad_region=671, passed=3200 Got 3200 stars (including 2369 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3200 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013035 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010428 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2320 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2317 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2317 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2317 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2662 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2321 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2317 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2662 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2317 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2662 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Excluding outliers - 2317 stars left (next iteration limit 2548) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2317 robust_rms=7.108 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.983 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2317 robust_rms=0.471 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.511 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2317 robust_rms=0.399 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.421 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2317 robust_rms_before=1.030 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.404 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.399 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.417 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.421 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.417 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=2317 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.406 n_q1=626 n_q2=355 n_q3=831 n_q4=505 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.053 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.6FkPFi6K85 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=174, bad_region=680, passed=3243 Got 3243 stars (including 2409 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3243 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013035 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010428 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2357 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2354 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2354 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2354 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2691 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2358 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2354 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2691 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2354 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2691 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Excluding outliers - 2354 stars left (next iteration limit 2589) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2354 robust_rms=7.084 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.037 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2354 robust_rms=0.482 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.506 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2354 robust_rms=0.394 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.441 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2354 robust_rms_before=1.037 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.404 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.394 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.424 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.441 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.424 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=2354 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.409 n_q1=640 n_q2=367 n_q3=849 n_q4=498 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.040 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits sigma_overall=0.317 worst_q_ratio=1.261 ref2=Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits sigma_overall=0.324 worst_q_ratio=1.264 new1=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits sigma_overall=0.415 worst_q_ratio=1.053 new2=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits sigma_overall=0.413 worst_q_ratio=1.040 reference average sigma_overall=0.3205 worst_q_ratio=1.2625 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137_astrometric_residuals.png (4894 matched stars from wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138_astrometric_residuals.png (4898 matched stars from wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362_astrometric_residuals.png (2317 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363_astrometric_residuals.png (2354 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Image size: 938.5'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 03:33:24.172 +14:02:45.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59 Second-epoch image center 03:33:24.172 +14:02:45.20 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0501 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits Image size: 938.5'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 03:33:23.499 +14:02:15.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59 Second-epoch image center 03:33:23.499 +14:02:15.90 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0415 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 03:33:24.172 +14:02:45.20 Second-epoch second image center 03:33:23.499 +14:02:15.90 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00858 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EIQ9rnd1iQ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2P41UpYuPZ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LxOYGPlkCP Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.H0fUzHjxyK Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 48584 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec +8.6191 to +19.2871 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec 8.6191 to 19.2871 deg Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3309 out of 3760 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3760 out of 48584 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.817800 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.817800 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 48584 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec +8.6191 to +19.2871 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec 8.6191 to 19.2871 deg Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3309 out of 3760 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3760 out of 48584 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (aperture=4.5) Read 48560 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0650 to 61.6548 deg, Dec +8.6183 to +19.2794 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0650 to 61.6548 deg, Dec 8.6183 to 19.2794 deg Loaded 4358 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3320 out of 3753 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3753 out of 48560 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (aperture=4.6) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 1.9 pix Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 2.1 pix fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 2.1 pix fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 15.6 mag. Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 14.2 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 14.2 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.EIQ9rnd1iQ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2222, bad_region=8835, passed=48571 Got 48571 stars (including 37859 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48571 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4893 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41607 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41607 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41607 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5382) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.268 n_q1=1704 n_q2=988 n_q3=1521 n_q4=680 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.244 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.2P41UpYuPZ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=2192, bad_region=8846, passed=48544 Got 48544 stars (including 37859 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48544 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41566 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41566 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41566 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4891 stars left (next iteration limit 5379) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits N_match=4891 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.271 n_q1=1699 n_q2=994 n_q3=1515 n_q4=683 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.265 The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.LxOYGPlkCP (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=612, bad_region=3036, passed=20844 Got 20844 stars (including 17334 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20844 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013035 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010428 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4883 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18596 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18596 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18596 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Excluding outliers - 4883 stars left (next iteration limit 5371) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=6.701 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.021 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=0.516 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.540 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=0.437 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.484 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4883 robust_rms_before=1.032 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.429 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.437 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.475 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.484 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.475 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4883 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.410 n_q1=1303 n_q2=668 n_q3=1864 n_q4=1048 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.071 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.H0fUzHjxyK (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=591, bad_region=3036, passed=20757 Got 20757 stars (including 17245 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20757 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013035 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010428 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4892 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18538 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18538 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18538 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5381) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=6.777 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.204 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=0.510 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.544 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=0.425 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.492 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4890 robust_rms_before=1.040 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.418 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.425 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.478 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.492 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.478 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.420 n_q1=1289 n_q2=680 n_q3=1871 n_q4=1050 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.060 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:18:54.08 +11:29:45.8: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:27:14.86 +16:00:09.3: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:37:45.57 +16:59:16.2: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:23:30.49 +17:10:30.1: 14.51 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:18:54.08 +11:29:45.8: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:27:14.86 +16:00:09.3: 11.67 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:23:30.49 +17:10:30.1: 14.46 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:37:45.57 +16:59:16.2: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.69 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:27:14.86 +16:00:09.3: ref_mag=11.69 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.9081 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:30.49 +17:10:30.1: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1060 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out57234.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out57596.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52890_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363 The candidate 52890_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363 did not pass the final checksDiscovery image 1 2026 08 16.32683 2461268.82683 11.86 03:27:14.81 +16:00:09.3 3915 4395 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55939_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363 The candidate 55939_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.32733 2461268.82733 11.97 03:27:14.90 +16:00:09.3 3917 4399 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits **** FOUND 03:36:02.16 +16:29:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56213_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363 The candidate 56213_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.32733 2461268.82733 13.38 03:36:02.17 +16:29:19.0 5196 4671 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56274_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363 The candidate 56274_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.32733 2461268.82733 13.68 03:18:29.67 +17:41:24.1 2675 5461 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits **** FOUND 03:49:22.11 +17:49:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56894_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363 The candidate 56894_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.32733 2461268.82733 13.39 03:49:22.16 +17:49:48.1 7133 5481 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits **** FOUND 03:36:16.21 +17:49:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57145_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363 The candidate 57145_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.32733 2461268.82733 13.95 03:36:16.23 +17:49:42.2 5241 5483 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57234_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363 Preparing report for the candidate 57234_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57596_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363 Preparing report for the candidate 57596_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57603_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363 The candidate 57603_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.32733 2461268.82733 14.04 03:14:42.78 +17:46:17.0 2128 5532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57681_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363 The candidate 57681_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.32733 2461268.82733 14.19 03:15:36.63 +16:56:58.1 2241 5026 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 16.32683 2461268.82683 14.25 03:23:30.41 +17:10:30.5 3390 5119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-50-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 03:37:45.57 +16:59:16.2 03:18:54.08 +11:29:45.8 ########### Completed Tau-05-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 03:37:45.57 +16:59:16.2 03:18:54.08 +11:29:45.8 ################################################################################### 03:37:45.57 +16:59:16.2 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 03:18:54.08 +11:29:45.8 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461268.82682698 -observatory V36 08:56:49.64 +18:28:42.5 Mercury (-1.4mag) 12:30:35.30 -04:57:28.0 Venus (-4.4mag) 06:12:41.77 +23:42:29.1 Mars (1.3mag) 08:50:11.51 +18:13:50.5 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:55:38.78 +03:08:17.2 Saturn (0.6mag) 04:12:33.71 +20:59:05.9 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:15:34.89 +00:09:25.4 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:27:22.88 -23:33:10.3 Pluto (14.5mag) 12:27:18.06 -07:13:30.8 Moon (-9.2mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Aug 16 03:20 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461268.82682698: 08:50:14.26 +18:13:39.9 Io (6.1mag) 08:50:17.75 +18:13:23.0 Europa (6.3mag) 08:50:25.29 +18:12:47.2 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:50:12.27 +18:13:45.0 Callisto (6.8mag) 08:47:39.79 +18:18:11.3 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:50:09.82 +18:13:58.8 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:47:16.60 +18:15:08.6 Elara (17.7mag) 08:54:20.25 +17:49:38.0 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:52:49.63 +18:25:57.4 Carme (19.0mag) 00:55:49.13 +03:07:49.8 Titan (8.4mag) 00:55:35.83 +03:08:01.6 Rhea (9.7mag) 00:56:07.41 +03:08:46.0 Iapetus (11.1mag) 00:55:51.49 +03:07:41.5 Hyperion (14.4mag) 00:54:50.93 +03:00:26.0 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 16 03:20 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461268.82682698: 19:38:48.48 -18:23:13.0 JWST 15:56:56.93 +49:21:55.6 Chandra 10:35:09.42 -58:10:51.1 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 16 03:20 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461268.82682698 -observatory V36 03:22:25.48 +18:01:07.6 17.6mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:00:10.55 -34:33:17.7 14.1mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:01:11.97 -69:13:20.6 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:11:50.25 +33:10:10.3 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 04:06:18.80 +40:42:44.2 17.2mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:31:51.27 +30:53:23.3 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:51:21.59 +26:23:47.6 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:29:05.54 +28:06:36.7 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:34:17.48 +05:18:33.3 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:14:05.29 -12:36:53.7 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:00:23.96 +64:59:38.2 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 15:40:38.75 -13:41:09.0 14.5mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:16:58.83 +31:43:09.9 15.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:05:59.01 +15:33:37.8 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:53:21.73 +43:24:49.3 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:58:34.03 +49:34:55.2 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:21:25.46 -12:54:16.9 15.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:01:15.58 +22:42:41.7 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 10:44:23.69 +20:22:34.4 17.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:03:14.69 +01:47:36.1 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:04:49.08 +76:59:52.9 16.6mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:09:35.20 +46:18:47.7 17.2mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:53:36.35 +09:22:08.2 17.4mag A/2026 E1 22:06:45.78 -30:25:29.4 7.0mag 10P/Tempel 11:33:54.62 -03:54:53.0 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 11:24:11.24 +01:59:21.5 17.3mag 63P/Wild 00:53:10.72 -05:47:31.2 15.4mag 65P/Gunn 05:53:41.82 +20:29:27.9 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 20:30:44.84 -24:25:01.6 17.6mag 84P/Giclas 03:07:54.32 +14:13:42.2 16.8mag 88P/Howell 08:16:08.80 +26:30:34.4 16.3mag 93P/Lovas 04:29:33.97 +20:02:17.9 17.4mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 06:23:06.89 +29:17:18.3 16.2mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 09:37:36.93 +25:13:29.6 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley 12:00:04.72 -13:21:14.5 17.2mag 124P/Mrkos 05:48:19.62 +21:07:07.0 16.0mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 06:42:10.03 +18:28:16.2 17.9mag 131P/Mueller 00:01:35.88 +03:16:31.2 17.5mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 03:15:48.58 -18:51:25.1 13.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 07:43:46.73 +38:05:24.6 16.0mag 162P/Siding Spring 12:30:26.51 +38:08:18.4 12.0mag 169P/NEAT 02:57:01.42 +09:31:48.1 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:46:23.38 -10:41:19.7 17.9mag 235P/LINEAR 20:17:59.50 -52:26:39.8 17.9mag 259P/Garradd 03:45:46.55 +28:30:00.3 15.3mag 260P/McNaught 07:29:38.45 +37:26:03.1 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:13:27.69 +02:14:10.5 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski 09:08:16.16 +17:58:25.2 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.3K Aug 16 03:20 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 16 03:20 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 16 03:20 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 15:52:09.810 +21:23:36.58 AT 2026wur 2026-05-19.33 21.14 17:21:27.821 +31:45:59.75 AT 2026wuq 2026-07-24.44 20.99 16:06:39.962 -00:03:48.96 AT 2026wup 2026-07-08.37 20.6 23:36:31.132 -01:42:30.56 AT 2026wuo 2026-07-25.58 21.53 14:58:54.953 +20:56:59.36 AT 2026wun 2026-06-12.38 21.33 13:29:54.424 -08:02:17.84 AT 2026wum 2026-05-12.34 21.76 15:31:56.171 -23:07:56.50 AT 2026wul 2026-07-16.29 21.12 15:50:35.869 +16:13:29.04 AT 2026wuk 2026-06-08.46 20.66 14:46:52.387 +23:41:33.95 AT 2026wuj 2026-07-19.29 20.84 02:33:14.312 +23:53:11.23 AT 2026wui 2026-07-25.60 21.47 23:59:19.033 +30:37:28.65 AT 2026wuh 2026-07-23.54 21.33 16:12:22.633 +29:40:38.32 AT 2026wug 2026-05-17.56 21.06 22:44:11.171 +19:47:25.41 AT 2026wuf 2026-06-22.52 21.62 18:17:56.544 +19:41:21.89 SN 2026wue 2026-08-02.91 19.16 21:01:30.094 -22:58:14.18 AT 2026wud 2026-08-02.45 20.19 17:15:36.662 +19:40:23.08 AT 2026wuc 2026-08-02.89 19.57 21:28:21.020 -26:47:22.51 AT 2026wub 2026-08-01.60 19.12 22:35:35.158 -48:27:31.72 AT 2026wua 2026-07-27.55 19.31 13:33:02.514 +37:11:45.73 AT 2026wtz 2026-08-02.28 17.867 23:09:39.462 -49:07:04.71 AT 2026wty 2026-07-20.06 19.281 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 16 03:20 tns_transients_list.txt Discovery image 2 2026 08 16.32733 2461268.82733 14.02 03:23:30.57 +17:10:29.7 3392 5124 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_031640_TTUQ2b1x1_1646412_8EomdCdQ/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_02-51-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits
