This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.3375 2461268.8375 11.32 03:42:49.88 +42:05:05.8
153.79306 -10.29053 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 10.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 237252520261744640 | 03:42:49.81 +42:05:05.5 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: G3 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.613+/-0.030 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:42:49.88 +42:05:05.8: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:42:49.88 +42:05:05.8: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 16.3375* 03 42 49.88 +42 05 05.8 11.3 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 237252520261744640,2461268.8375,11.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 237252520261744640 20260816.3375 11.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.3375 2461268.8375 11.84 03:43:28.13 +41:11:18.9
154.45085 -10.92269 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.0" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J055.8671+41.1886 | 03:43:28.13 +41:11:18.9 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.692+/-0.026 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:43:28.13 +41:11:18.9: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:43:28.13 +41:11:18.9: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 16.3375* 03 43 28.13 +41 11 18.9 11.8 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J055.8671+41.1886,2461268.8375,11.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J055.8671+41.1886 20260816.3375 11.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.3375 2461268.8375 12.01 03:42:21.95 +42:02:31.1
153.75063 -10.37753 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 9.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 03:42:21.95 +42:02:31.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: G5 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.777+/-0.028 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:42:21.95 +42:02:31.1: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:42:21.95 +42:02:31.1: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 16.3375* 03 42 21.95 +42 02 31.1 12.0 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461268.8375,12.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260816.3375 12.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.3375 2461268.8375 11.86 03:43:07.93 +42:17:01.9
153.71332 -10.09945 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J055.7856+42.2881 | 03:43:07.93 +42:17:01.9 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) SpType: F0 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.306+/-0.032 (F)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:43:07.93 +42:17:01.9: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:43:07.93 +42:17:01.9: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 16.3375* 03 43 07.93 +42 17 01.9 11.9 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J055.7856+42.2881,2461268.8375,11.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J055.7856+42.2881 20260816.3375 11.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.3375 2461268.8375 11.94 03:43:10.97 +41:12:32.7
154.39487 -10.93982 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 9.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J055.8053+41.2170 | 03:43:10.97 +41:12:32.7 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.311+/-0.028 (F)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:43:10.97 +41:12:32.7: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:43:10.97 +41:12:32.7: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 16.3375* 03 43 10.97 +41 12 32.7 11.9 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J055.8053+41.2170,2461268.8375,11.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J055.8053+41.2170 20260816.3375 11.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.3375 2461268.8375 11.93 03:45:17.05 +42:19:07.3
154.00891 -9.82597 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J056.3232+42.3228 | 03:45:17.05 +42:19:07.3 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) SpType: G5 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.748+/-0.028 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:45:17.05 +42:19:07.3: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:45:17.05 +42:19:07.3: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 16.3375* 03 45 17.05 +42 19 07.3 11.9 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J056.3232+42.3228,2461268.8375,11.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J056.3232+42.3228 20260816.3375 11.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.3375 2461268.8375 11.86 03:46:01.90 +42:19:24.2
154.11570 -9.73632 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J056.4946+42.3226 | 03:46:01.89 +42:19:23.8 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=0.998+/-0.028 (M)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:46:01.90 +42:19:24.2: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:46:01.90 +42:19:24.2: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 16.3375* 03 46 01.90 +42 19 24.2 11.9 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J056.4946+42.3226,2461268.8375,11.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J056.4946+42.3226 20260816.3375 11.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.3375 2461268.8375 11.85 03:42:31.76 +41:03:10.3
154.39434 -11.13868 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.6" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 03:42:31.76 +41:03:10.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: G8 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.655+/-0.027 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:42:31.76 +41:03:10.3: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:42:31.76 +41:03:10.3: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 16.3375* 03 42 31.76 +41 03 10.3 11.8 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461268.8375,11.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260816.3375 11.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.3375 2461268.8375 11.88 03:43:57.17 +41:52:04.7
154.09585 -10.33275 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 9.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J055.9825+41.8676 | 03:43:57.17 +41:52:04.7 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.531+/-0.027 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:43:57.17 +41:52:04.7: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:43:57.17 +41:52:04.7: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 16.3375* 03 43 57.17 +41 52 04.7 11.9 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J055.9825+41.8676,2461268.8375,11.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J055.9825+41.8676 20260816.3375 11.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.3375 2461268.8375 11.86 03:44:30.37 +41:48:29.3
154.21576 -10.31591 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 10.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J056.1265+41.8080 | 03:44:30.37 +41:48:29.3 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) SpType: F7 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.370+/-0.026 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:44:30.37 +41:48:29.3: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:44:30.37 +41:48:29.3: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 16.3375* 03 44 30.37 +41 48 29.3 11.9 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J056.1265+41.8080,2461268.8375,11.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J056.1265+41.8080 20260816.3375 11.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.3375 2461268.8375 11.64 03:43:02.40 +42:05:41.1
153.81794 -10.25898 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 9.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" Gaia DR3 237258258338033920
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.540 G 12.570 G G
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:43:02.40 +42:05:41.1: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:43:02.40 +42:05:41.1: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 16.3375* 03 43 02.40 +42 05 41.1 11.6 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 237258258338033920,2461268.8375,11.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 237258258338033920 20260816.3375 11.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.3375 2461268.8375 11.67 03:44:09.61 +41:43:08.2
154.22047 -10.42590 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 9.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | DocumentRef: VOTx2775915 | 03:44:09.53 +41:43:07.6 (Gaia DR3) | (VSX @ VizieR) | (VSX @ VizieR) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=0.783+/-0.033 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:44:09.61 +41:43:08.2: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:44:09.61 +41:43:08.2: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 16.3375* 03 44 09.61 +41 43 08.2 11.7 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DocumentRef: VOTx2775915,2461268.8375,11.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DocumentRef: VOTx2775915 20260816.3375 11.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.3375 2461268.8375 11.62 03:43:17.69 +41:48:19.4
154.03715 -10.45767 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 10.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | DocumentRef: VOTx2417297 | 03:43:17.69 +41:48:19.4 (user input) | (VSX @ VizieR) | (VSX @ VizieR) | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.193+/-0.028 (F)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:43:17.69 +41:48:19.4: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:43:17.69 +41:48:19.4: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 16.3375* 03 43 17.69 +41 48 19.4 11.6 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DocumentRef: VOTx2417297,2461268.8375,11.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DocumentRef: VOTx2417297 20260816.3375 11.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.3375 2461268.8375 11.63 03:44:21.90 +42:19:20.3
153.87134 -9.92850 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 243266951945340416 | 03:44:21.95 +42:19:20.8 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=0.648+/-0.032 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:44:21.90 +42:19:20.3: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:44:21.90 +42:19:20.3: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 16.3375* 03 44 21.90 +42 19 20.3 11.6 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 243266951945340416,2461268.8375,11.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 243266951945340416 20260816.3375 11.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.3375 2461268.8375 11.40 03:41:53.98 +42:04:30.4
153.66048 -10.40442 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | DocumentRef: VOTx2418427 | 03:41:53.98 +42:04:30.4 (user input) | (GCVS) | (GCVS) | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.324+/-0.034 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:41:53.98 +42:04:30.4: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:41:53.98 +42:04:30.4: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 16.3375* 03 41 53.98 +42 04 30.4 11.4 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DocumentRef: VOTx2418427,2461268.8375,11.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DocumentRef: VOTx2418427 20260816.3375 11.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.3375 2461268.8375 11.47 03:42:11.96 +41:56:47.5
153.78536 -10.47186 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 10.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | DocumentRef: VOTx2415704 | 03:42:11.96 +41:56:47.5 (user input) | (GCVS) | (GCVS) | (position from user input) SpType: F5 (LAMOST DR5)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:42:11.96 +41:56:47.5: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:42:11.96 +41:56:47.5: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 16.3375* 03 42 11.96 +41 56 47.5 11.5 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DocumentRef: VOTx2415704,2461268.8375,11.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DocumentRef: VOTx2415704 20260816.3375 11.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.3375 2461268.8375 11.46 03:42:50.40 +41:46:35.9
153.98726 -10.53255 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 9.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 237197579040704768 | 03:42:50.33 +41:46:35.9 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: G5 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.956+/-0.028 (M)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:42:50.40 +41:46:35.9: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:42:50.40 +41:46:35.9: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 16.3375* 03 42 50.40 +41 46 35.9 11.5 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 237197579040704768,2461268.8375,11.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 237197579040704768 20260816.3375 11.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.3375 2461268.8375 10.63 04:50:24.40 +33:00:50.3
169.84106 -7.33144 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | DocumentRef: VOTx2426101 | 04:50:24.40 +33:00:50.3 (user input) | (GCVS) | (GCVS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 04:50:24.40 +33:00:50.3: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 04:50:24.40 +33:00:50.3: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DocumentRef: VOTx2426101,2461268.8375,10.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DocumentRef: VOTx2426101 20260816.3375 10.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.3375 2461268.8375 10.99 03:43:10.12 +42:13:49.2
153.75220 -10.13747 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | DocumentRef: VOTx2581853 | 03:43:10.04 +42:13:47.8 (Gaia DR3) | (GCVS) | (GCVS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:43:10.12 +42:13:49.2: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:43:10.12 +42:13:49.2: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 16.3375* 03 43 10.12 +42 13 49.2 11.0 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DocumentRef: VOTx2581853,2461268.8375,10.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DocumentRef: VOTx2581853 20260816.3375 10.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.78853589 23.12.2025 06:55:19.501 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
First image: 2461032.78853589 23.12.2025 06:55:19.501 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
Last image: 2461268.83776152 16.08.2026 08:06:12.595 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 0
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 16117
Objects passed selection criteria: 16012
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.1 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.1 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9568.5
Average stars matched: 8959.25 (93.6328 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 242668 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 16 03:10:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.78853589 23.12.2025 06:55:19.501 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
First image: 2461032.78853589 23.12.2025 06:55:19.501 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
Last image: 2461268.83776152 16.08.2026 08:06:12.595 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 182
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 18 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 118803
Objects passed selection criteria: 118386
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.1 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.1 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 72068
Average stars matched: 66589 (92.3975 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 586044 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 16 03:11:07 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461268.83714808
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:21:49.059 +37:59:50.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:22:02.797 +37:58:30.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:21:49.059 +37:59:50.85
Second-epoch image center 04:22:02.797 +37:58:30.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0503 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:22:05.990 +37:57:49.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:21:49.059 +37:59:50.85
Second-epoch image center 04:22:05.990 +37:57:49.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0650 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:22:02.797 +37:58:30.64
Second-epoch second image center 04:22:05.990 +37:57:49.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01541 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bmmaGuxiSv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CWBvIzwPd7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eXKtlIchKp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits &> /tmp/tmp.d3vIFQXQ2V
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits and wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits and wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits and wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits) and catalog (wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 18677 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 54.9661 to 76.3326 deg, Dec +32.1948 to +43.3141 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 54.9661 to 76.3326 deg, Dec 32.1948 to 43.3141 deg
Loaded 9192 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6385 out of 7127 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7127 out of 18677 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.973500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.973500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 18677 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 54.9661 to 76.3326 deg, Dec +32.1948 to +43.3141 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 54.9661 to 76.3326 deg, Dec 32.1948 to 43.3141 deg
Loaded 9192 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6385 out of 7127 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7127 out of 18677 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 18569 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 54.4956 to 75.7898 deg, Dec +32.0248 to +43.3806 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 54.4956 to 75.7898 deg, Dec 32.0248 to 43.3806 deg
Loaded 9219 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6462 out of 7192 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7192 out of 18569 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
2.1 pix Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
2.7 pix fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
2.6 pix fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
15.4 mag. Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
12.5 mag. fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
11.8 mag. fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 11.8 (SNR ) 9.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.bmmaGuxiSv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits' -> 'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1808, bad_region=0, passed=18677
Got 18677 stars (including 16842 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18677 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4856 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4856 stars left (next iteration limit 5341)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits N_match=4856 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.245 n_q1=1609 n_q2=1204 n_q3=763 n_q4=1280 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.356
The image catalog is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits -region wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CWBvIzwPd7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits' -> 'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1757, bad_region=0, passed=18569
Got 18569 stars (including 16779 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18569 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4857 stars left (next iteration limit 5342)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits N_match=4857 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.534 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.351 n_q1=1197 n_q2=768 n_q3=1133 n_q4=1759 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.371
The image catalog is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits -region wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eXKtlIchKp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=39, bad_region=0, passed=783
Got 783 stars (including 742 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 783 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 712 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 669 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 732 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 713 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 706 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 733 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 706 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 733 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 706 stars left (next iteration limit 778)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: the 706 catalog matches do not cover the frame (278/98/319/11 per quadrant, need 44 in each) - keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits N_match=706 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.698 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.147 n_q1=278 n_q2=98 n_q3=319 n_q4=11 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.245
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits -region wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.d3vIFQXQ2V (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=25, bad_region=0, passed=549
Got 549 stars (including 521 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 549 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 502 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 501 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 446 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 501 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 501 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 500 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 500 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 486 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 500 stars left (next iteration limit 551)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: the 500 catalog matches do not cover the frame (165/67/256/12 per quadrant, need 31 in each) - keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits N_match=500 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.620 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.202 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.580 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.085 n_q1=165 n_q2=67 n_q3=256 n_q4=12 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.939
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits -region wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits sigma_overall=0.308 worst_q_ratio=1.356
ref2=Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits sigma_overall=0.390 worst_q_ratio=1.371
new1=fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits sigma_overall=0.511 worst_q_ratio=2.245
new2=fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits sigma_overall=0.620 worst_q_ratio=1.939
reference average sigma_overall=0.349 worst_q_ratio=1.3635
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342_astrometric_residuals.png (4856 matched stars from wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025_astrometric_residuals.png (4857 matched stars from wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005_astrometric_residuals.png (706 matched stars from wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.48 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006_astrometric_residuals.png (500 matched stars from wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.55 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Per-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Per-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:21:49.059 +37:59:50.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:22:02.797 +37:58:30.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:21:49.059 +37:59:50.85
Second-epoch image center 04:22:02.797 +37:58:30.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0503 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:22:05.990 +37:57:49.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:21:49.059 +37:59:50.85
Second-epoch image center 04:22:05.990 +37:57:49.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0650 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:22:02.797 +37:58:30.64
Second-epoch second image center 04:22:05.990 +37:57:49.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01541 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dTz65C4eqx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zawL9jDGJv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NSSVxWOqOK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits &> /tmp/tmp.p25ebZIpIz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits and wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits and wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits and wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits) and catalog (wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 137281 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 54.9471 to 76.3491 deg, Dec +32.1657 to +43.3179 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 54.9471 to 76.3491 deg, Dec 32.1657 to 43.3179 deg
Loaded 9244 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5249 out of 7194 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7194 out of 137281 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.846000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.846000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 137281 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 54.9471 to 76.3491 deg, Dec +32.1657 to +43.3179 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 54.9471 to 76.3491 deg, Dec 32.1657 to 43.3179 deg
Loaded 9244 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5249 out of 7194 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7194 out of 137281 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 140690 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 54.4527 to 75.8199 deg, Dec +31.9743 to +43.3811 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 54.4527 to 75.8199 deg, Dec 31.9743 to 43.3811 deg
Loaded 9291 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5356 out of 7280 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7280 out of 140690 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 121 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
1.9 pix Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
2.5 pix fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
2.5 pix fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
15.6 mag. Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
12.4 mag. fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
12.2 mag. fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.2 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.dTz65C4eqx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits' -> 'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=15371, bad_region=12, passed=137258
Got 137258 stars (including 121586 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 137258 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 137258 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 137258 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 137258 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4855 stars left (next iteration limit 5340)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits N_match=4855 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.241 n_q1=1433 n_q2=1266 n_q3=805 n_q4=1351 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.292
The image catalog is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits -region wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zawL9jDGJv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits' -> 'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=59, blended=14565, bad_region=4, passed=140631
Got 140631 stars (including 125769 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 140631 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4857 stars left (next iteration limit 5342)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits N_match=4857 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1235 n_q2=808 n_q3=1172 n_q4=1642 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284
The image catalog is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits -region wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NSSVxWOqOK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=164, bad_region=5, passed=7170
Got 7170 stars (including 6970 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7170 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4839 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.79"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7145 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4841 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4808 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7145 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.82"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4808 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7145 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.84"
Excluding outliers - 4808 stars left (next iteration limit 5286)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: the 4808 catalog matches do not cover the frame (1762/614/2333/99 per quadrant, need 300 in each) - keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits N_match=4808 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.797 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.810 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.048 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.726 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.063 n_q1=1762 n_q2=614 n_q3=2333 n_q4=99 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.333
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits -region wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.p25ebZIpIz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=101, bad_region=4, passed=5362
Got 5362 stars (including 5233 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5362 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4809 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.96"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4808 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5329 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.96"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4809 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5329 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.00"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4809 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5329 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.01"
Excluding outliers - 4809 stars left (next iteration limit 5288)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: the 4809 catalog matches do not cover the frame (1600/497/2593/119 per quadrant, need 300 in each) - keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits N_match=4809 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.950 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.965 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.336 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.880 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.164 n_q1=1600 n_q2=497 n_q3=2593 n_q4=119 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.406
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits -region wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-05-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_030647_TTUQ1b1x1_917162_k5iWJrTF/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Per-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:42:12.18 +42:33:05.1: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:42:35.71 +42:40:17.0: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:44:58.31 +42:51:36.9: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:43:38.68 +42:40:13.5: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:43:11.61 +42:45:20.9: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:42:10.38 +42:33:21.0: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:42:49.88 +42:05:05.8: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:42:35.71 +42:40:17.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:35.71 +42:40:17.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:43:38.68 +42:40:13.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:38.68 +42:40:13.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:42:12.18 +42:33:05.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:12.18 +42:33:05.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:44:58.31 +42:51:36.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:58.31 +42:51:36.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:43:11.61 +42:45:20.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:11.61 +42:45:20.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:42:10.38 +42:33:21.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:10.38 +42:33:21.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:43:28.13 +41:11:18.9: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:43:05.07 +42:54:18.4: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:43:58.69 +42:39:45.0: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:43:05.07 +42:54:18.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:05.07 +42:54:18.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:43:58.69 +42:39:45.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:58.69 +42:39:45.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:43:28.13 +41:11:18.9: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:42:49.88 +42:05:05.8: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:43:28.13 +41:11:18.9: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8440 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:42:49.88 +42:05:05.8: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2962 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:43:01.59 +42:41:27.7: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:44:09.82 +42:52:56.4: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:43:01.95 +42:48:15.4: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:42:34.04 +42:40:07.8: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:44:09.82 +42:52:56.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:09.82 +42:52:56.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:43:01.59 +42:41:27.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:01.59 +42:41:27.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:42:22.70 +42:49:22.7: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:43:01.95 +42:48:15.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:01.95 +42:48:15.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:45:23.24 +42:55:50.3: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:42:34.04 +42:40:07.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:34.04 +42:40:07.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:42:22.70 +42:49:22.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:22.70 +42:49:22.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:45:23.24 +42:55:50.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:23.24 +42:55:50.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:43:48.02 +42:51:01.6: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:43:48.02 +42:51:01.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:48.02 +42:51:01.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:42:21.95 +42:02:31.1: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:42:21.95 +42:02:31.1: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:42:21.95 +42:02:31.1: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9906 delta=1.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:44:53.16 +42:44:23.0: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:43:04.49 +42:29:53.3: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:44:53.16 +42:44:23.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:53.16 +42:44:23.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:43:41.87 +42:45:30.4: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:44:06.18 +42:32:23.1: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:43:50.11 +42:51:24.5: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:43:04.49 +42:29:53.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:04.49 +42:29:53.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:43:41.87 +42:45:30.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:41.87 +42:45:30.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:44:06.18 +42:32:23.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:06.18 +42:32:23.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:43:50.11 +42:51:24.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:50.11 +42:51:24.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:44:24.37 +42:30:13.0: 12.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:44:24.37 +42:30:13.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:24.37 +42:30:13.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:42:50.54 +42:52:34.7: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:42:50.54 +42:52:34.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:50.54 +42:52:34.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:43:10.88 +42:41:38.2: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:43:39.25 +42:42:27.0: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:42:19.10 +42:32:00.5: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:43:10.88 +42:41:38.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:10.88 +42:41:38.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:43:39.25 +42:42:27.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:39.25 +42:42:27.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:42:19.10 +42:32:00.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:19.10 +42:32:00.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:42:08.73 +42:38:01.9: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:42:08.73 +42:38:01.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:08.73 +42:38:01.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:43:10.97 +41:12:32.7: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:43:07.93 +42:17:01.9: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:43:28.50 +42:30:47.9: 12.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:43:28.50 +42:30:47.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:28.50 +42:30:47.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:43:10.97 +41:12:32.7: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:43:10.97 +41:12:32.7: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9059 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:43:07.93 +42:17:01.9: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:43:07.93 +42:17:01.9: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8263 delta=1.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:42:20.01 +42:34:41.0: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:42:37.20 +42:27:22.8: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:42:20.01 +42:34:41.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:20.01 +42:34:41.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:42:37.20 +42:27:22.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:37.20 +42:27:22.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:45:24.90 +42:51:41.1: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:45:17.05 +42:19:07.3: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:45:24.90 +42:51:41.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:24.90 +42:51:41.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:46:01.90 +42:19:24.2: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:45:17.05 +42:19:07.3: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:45:17.05 +42:19:07.3: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9232 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:46:01.90 +42:19:24.2: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:46:01.90 +42:19:24.2: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8368 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:42:25.59 +42:48:20.3: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:42:25.59 +42:48:20.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:25.59 +42:48:20.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:42:31.76 +41:03:10.3: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:42:31.76 +41:03:10.3: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:42:31.76 +41:03:10.3: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8289 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:48:36.38 +42:50:20.8: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:48:36.38 +42:50:20.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:36.38 +42:50:20.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:47:35.16 +42:52:58.5: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:47:35.16 +42:52:58.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:47:35.16 +42:52:58.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:43:57.17 +41:52:04.7: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:44:59.21 +42:39:05.2: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:44:59.21 +42:39:05.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:59.21 +42:39:05.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:43:57.17 +41:52:04.7: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:43:57.17 +41:52:04.7: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8793 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:44:58.58 +42:57:20.3: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:44:58.58 +42:57:20.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:58.58 +42:57:20.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:42:07.95 +42:39:47.9: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:42:07.95 +42:39:47.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:07.95 +42:39:47.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:41:56.48 +42:52:38.8: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:41:56.48 +42:52:38.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:41:56.48 +42:52:38.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:43:09.60 +42:26:30.4: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:43:09.60 +42:26:30.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:09.60 +42:26:30.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:44:30.37 +41:48:29.3: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:44:30.37 +41:48:29.3: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:44:30.37 +41:48:29.3: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8499 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:47:59.80 +42:54:52.9: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:47:59.80 +42:54:52.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:47:59.80 +42:54:52.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:43:09.97 +42:40:10.4: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:43:09.97 +42:40:10.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:09.97 +42:40:10.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:43:02.40 +42:05:41.1: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:43:02.40 +42:05:41.1: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:43:02.40 +42:05:41.1: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6218 delta=1.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:42:53.77 +42:52:18.3: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:42:53.77 +42:52:18.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:53.77 +42:52:18.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:42:35.66 +42:45:08.1: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:46:48.62 +42:34:18.0: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:42:35.66 +42:45:08.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:35.66 +42:45:08.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:46:48.62 +42:34:18.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:48.62 +42:34:18.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:44:09.61 +41:43:08.2: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:44:09.61 +41:43:08.2: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:44:09.61 +41:43:08.2: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6681 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:49:53.91 +42:54:33.8: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:48:58.40 +42:57:24.0: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:49:53.91 +42:54:33.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:53.91 +42:54:33.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:48:58.40 +42:57:24.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:58.40 +42:57:24.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:46:06.65 +42:34:45.1: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:46:06.65 +42:34:45.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:06.65 +42:34:45.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:41:47.91 +42:39:52.5: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:41:47.91 +42:39:52.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:41:47.91 +42:39:52.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:42:00.05 +42:49:43.1: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:42:00.05 +42:49:43.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:00.05 +42:49:43.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:43:17.69 +41:48:19.4: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:44:21.90 +42:19:20.3: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:49:07.43 +42:58:44.8: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:49:07.43 +42:58:44.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:07.43 +42:58:44.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:41:53.98 +42:04:30.4: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:43:17.69 +41:48:19.4: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:46:28.77 +42:56:12.7: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:43:17.69 +41:48:19.4: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6218 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:44:21.90 +42:19:20.3: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:46:28.77 +42:56:12.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:28.77 +42:56:12.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:44:21.90 +42:19:20.3: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6269 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:41:53.98 +42:04:30.4: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:41:53.98 +42:04:30.4: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3807 delta=1.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:42:45.40 +42:53:41.9: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:47:22.95 +42:52:30.3: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:41:39.48 +42:37:04.9: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:42:45.40 +42:53:41.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:45.40 +42:53:41.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:47:22.95 +42:52:30.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:47:22.95 +42:52:30.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:41:39.48 +42:37:04.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:41:39.48 +42:37:04.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:48:35.56 +42:59:38.2: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:48:35.56 +42:59:38.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:35.56 +42:59:38.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:45:39.31 +42:40:45.8: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:45:39.31 +42:40:45.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:39.31 +42:40:45.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:44:49.49 +42:30:54.2: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:43:16.14 +42:32:22.3: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:44:49.49 +42:30:54.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:49.49 +42:30:54.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:43:16.14 +42:32:22.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:16.14 +42:32:22.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:42:11.96 +41:56:47.5: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:45:00.44 +42:44:55.4: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:45:00.44 +42:44:55.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:00.44 +42:44:55.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:42:11.96 +41:56:47.5: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:45:20.66 +42:57:10.6: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:42:11.96 +41:56:47.5: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4639 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:45:20.66 +42:57:10.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:20.66 +42:57:10.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:44:54.61 +42:44:05.3: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:44:54.61 +42:44:05.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:54.61 +42:44:05.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:42:50.40 +41:46:35.9: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:45:44.14 +42:54:12.8: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:42:50.40 +41:46:35.9: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:45:44.14 +42:54:12.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:44.14 +42:54:12.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:42:50.40 +41:46:35.9: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4386 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:42:24.10 +42:26:58.9: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:42:24.10 +42:26:58.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:24.10 +42:26:58.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:44:00.46 +42:43:52.2: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:44:00.46 +42:43:52.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:00.46 +42:43:52.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:46:00.04 +42:49:39.7: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:46:00.04 +42:49:39.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:00.04 +42:49:39.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:42:03.53 +42:44:27.1: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:42:03.53 +42:44:27.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:03.53 +42:44:27.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:47:09.33 +42:58:18.9: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:47:09.33 +42:58:18.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:47:09.33 +42:58:18.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 04:46:59.88 +32:41:50.8: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 04:46:59.88 +32:41:50.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:59.88 +32:41:50.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:42:03.25 +42:38:53.6: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:42:35.25 +42:51:17.0: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:42:03.25 +42:38:53.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:03.25 +42:38:53.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:42:35.25 +42:51:17.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:35.25 +42:51:17.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 04:46:28.34 +32:39:08.5: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 04:46:28.34 +32:39:08.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:28.34 +32:39:08.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:44:45.11 +42:39:56.1: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:44:45.11 +42:39:56.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:45.11 +42:39:56.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:44:39.74 +42:42:21.3: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:44:39.74 +42:42:21.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:39.74 +42:42:21.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:41:45.82 +42:44:38.1: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:41:45.82 +42:44:38.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:41:45.82 +42:44:38.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 04:46:44.04 +32:37:33.5: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 04:46:44.04 +32:37:33.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:44.04 +32:37:33.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:45:08.71 +42:41:37.7: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:45:08.71 +42:41:37.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:08.71 +42:41:37.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 04:50:37.28 +32:48:49.5: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 04:50:37.28 +32:48:49.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:50:37.28 +32:48:49.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 04:50:24.40 +33:00:50.3: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:43:37.28 +42:54:17.1: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:43:37.28 +42:54:17.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:37.28 +42:54:17.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:43:18.97 +42:29:53.5: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 04:50:24.40 +33:00:50.3: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:50:24.40 +33:00:50.3: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.5555 delta=1.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:43:18.97 +42:29:53.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:18.97 +42:29:53.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:43:10.12 +42:13:49.2: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:41:44.89 +42:31:58.5: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:41:44.89 +42:31:58.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:41:44.89 +42:31:58.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:43:10.12 +42:13:49.2: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:43:10.12 +42:13:49.2: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9785 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:41:49.09 +42:50:51.2: 11.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:41:49.09 +42:50:51.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:41:49.09 +42:50:51.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:42:27.51 +42:36:29.9: 11.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:42:27.51 +42:36:29.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:27.51 +42:36:29.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:42:25.66 +42:30:05.2: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:42:25.66 +42:30:05.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:25.66 +42:30:05.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 03:44:16.43 +42:38:37.2: 11.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 03:44:16.43 +42:38:37.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:16.43 +42:38:37.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 04:46:54.50 +32:35:07.5: 11.11 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 04:46:54.50 +32:35:07.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:54.50 +32:35:07.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0342.fits at 04:46:13.47 +32:46:28.5: 11.08 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-03-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0025.fits at 04:46:13.47 +32:46:28.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:13.47 +32:46:28.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out14873.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out15136.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out15279.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out15420.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out16516.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out18797.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out18832.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out18946.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out19536.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21341.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out23193.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24366.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24657.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24689.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out26078.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34932.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35382.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out37599.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out98137.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 229s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 9s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169009_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 169009_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:12.15 +43:02:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169086_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 169086_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:40.45 +42:35:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08258_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 08258_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18946_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
Preparing report for the candidate 18946_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09837_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 09837_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05093_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 05093_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09932_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 09932_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06351_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 06351_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07720_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 07720_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35382_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
Preparing report for the candidate 35382_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03428_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 03428_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08202_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 08202_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07353_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 07353_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05328_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 05328_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07619_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 07619_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03615_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 03615_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04157_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 04157_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04829_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 04829_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19536_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
Preparing report for the candidate 19536_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04742_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 04742_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06439_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 06439_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07044_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 07044_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04643_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 04643_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10664_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 10664_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11190_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 11190_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11473_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 11473_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03898_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 03898_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07467_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 07467_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15279_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
Preparing report for the candidate 15279_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34932_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
Preparing report for the candidate 34932_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07366_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 07366_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10154_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 10154_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08203_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 08203_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11090_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 11090_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09321_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 09321_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11751_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 11751_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15136_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
Preparing report for the candidate 15136_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15420_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
Preparing report for the candidate 15420_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05004_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 05004_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05261_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 05261_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37599_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
Preparing report for the candidate 37599_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06406_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 06406_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05163_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 05163_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23193_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
Preparing report for the candidate 23193_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08784_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 08784_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03184_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 03184_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07673_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 07673_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03616_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 03616_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12478_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 12478_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24657_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
Preparing report for the candidate 24657_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04583_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 04583_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07918_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 07918_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18797_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
Preparing report for the candidate 18797_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04066_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 04066_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06170_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 06170_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10900_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 10900_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26078_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
Preparing report for the candidate 26078_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05415_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 05415_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04130_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 04130_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10470_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 10470_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07602_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 07602_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24366_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
Preparing report for the candidate 24366_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14873_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
Preparing report for the candidate 14873_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04600_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 04600_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03730_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 03730_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18832_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
Preparing report for the candidate 18832_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03939_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 03939_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05290_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 05290_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03607_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 03607_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08407_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 08407_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03330_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 03330_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08443_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 08443_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21341_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
Preparing report for the candidate 21341_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11379_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 11379_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10404_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 10404_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07054_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 07054_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03328_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 03328_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07295_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 07295_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24689_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
Preparing report for the candidate 24689_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20549_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 20549_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:41:50.88 +41:59:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04282_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 04282_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12022_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 12022_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07161_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 07161_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05873_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 05873_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06383_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 06383_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03451_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 03451_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94023_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 94023_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08039_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 08039_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04424_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 04424_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93478_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 93478_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08444_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 08444_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07754_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 07754_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06118_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 06118_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93272_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 93272_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08112_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 08112_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98137_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
Preparing report for the candidate 98137_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95996_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 95996_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04543_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 04543_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11412_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 11412_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16516_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
Preparing report for the candidate 16516_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05091_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 05091_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:45.64 +42:55:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10279_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 10279_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98854_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 98854_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:57.08 +33:04:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04281_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 04281_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09612_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 09612_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10997_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 10997_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08818_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 08818_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92893_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 92893_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94630_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 94630_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10560_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 10560_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:48.52 +42:36:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101165_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 101165_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:24.58 +34:34:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105127_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 105127_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:37.58 +33:57:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99340_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 99340_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:59.03 +33:35:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53373_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 53373_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:51.59 +40:00:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117811_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 117811_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:58:58.02 +35:47:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93179_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 93179_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:19.09 +32:35:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12981_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 12981_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:11.74 +42:34:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104673_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 104673_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:53.68 +34:21:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127301_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 127301_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:31.49 +36:27:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135996_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 135996_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:59.42 +33:09:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94780_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006
The candidate 94780_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_03-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0006 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:32.52 +33:05:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 2s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 240s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Per-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
03:44:21.90 +42:19:20.3
03:45:17.05 +42:19:07.3
03:43:07.93 +42:17:01.9
03:46:01.90 +42:19:24.2
03:43:10.12 +42:13:49.2
03:43:02.40 +42:05:41.1
03:41:53.98 +42:04:30.4
03:42:49.88 +42:05:05.8
03:42:21.95 +42:02:31.1
03:42:11.96 +41:56:47.5
03:43:57.17 +41:52:04.7
03:43:17.69 +41:48:19.4
03:44:30.37 +41:48:29.3
03:42:50.40 +41:46:35.9
03:44:09.61 +41:43:08.2
03:43:10.97 +41:12:32.7
03:43:28.13 +41:11:18.9
03:42:31.76 +41:03:10.3
04:50:24.40 +33:00:50.3
########### Completed Per-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
03:42:49.88 +42:05:05.8
03:43:28.13 +41:11:18.9
03:42:21.95 +42:02:31.1
03:43:07.93 +42:17:01.9
03:43:10.97 +41:12:32.7
03:45:17.05 +42:19:07.3
03:46:01.90 +42:19:24.2
03:42:31.76 +41:03:10.3
03:43:57.17 +41:52:04.7
03:44:30.37 +41:48:29.3
03:43:02.40 +42:05:41.1
03:44:09.61 +41:43:08.2
03:43:17.69 +41:48:19.4
03:44:21.90 +42:19:20.3
03:41:53.98 +42:04:30.4
03:42:11.96 +41:56:47.5
03:42:50.40 +41:46:35.9
04:50:24.40 +33:00:50.3
03:43:10.12 +42:13:49.2
###################################################################################
03:42:49.88 +42:05:05.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
03:43:28.13 +41:11:18.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
03:42:21.95 +42:02:31.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
03:43:07.93 +42:17:01.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
03:43:10.97 +41:12:32.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
03:45:17.05 +42:19:07.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
03:46:01.90 +42:19:24.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
03:42:31.76 +41:03:10.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
03:43:57.17 +41:52:04.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
03:44:30.37 +41:48:29.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
03:43:02.40 +42:05:41.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
03:44:09.61 +41:43:08.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
03:43:17.69 +41:48:19.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
03:44:21.90 +42:19:20.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
03:41:53.98 +42:04:30.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
03:42:11.96 +41:56:47.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
03:42:50.40 +41:46:35.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
04:50:24.40 +33:00:50.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
03:43:10.12 +42:13:49.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
03:41:53.98 +42:04:30.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
03:42:11.96 +41:56:47.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
03:42:21.95 +42:02:31.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
03:42:31.76 +41:03:10.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
03:42:49.88 +42:05:05.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
03:42:50.40 +41:46:35.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
03:43:02.40 +42:05:41.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
03:43:07.93 +42:17:01.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
03:43:10.12 +42:13:49.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
03:43:10.97 +41:12:32.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
03:43:17.69 +41:48:19.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
03:43:28.13 +41:11:18.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
03:43:57.17 +41:52:04.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
03:44:09.61 +41:43:08.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
03:44:21.90 +42:19:20.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
03:44:30.37 +41:48:29.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
03:45:17.05 +42:19:07.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
03:46:01.90 +42:19:24.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
04:50:24.40 +33:00:50.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
03:41:53.98 +42:04:30.4 -- not a known variable star
03:42:11.96 +41:56:47.5 -- not a known variable star
03:42:21.95 +42:02:31.1 -- not a known variable star
03:42:31.76 +41:03:10.3 -- not a known variable star
03:42:49.88 +42:05:05.8 -- not a known variable star
03:42:50.40 +41:46:35.9 -- not a known variable star
03:43:02.40 +42:05:41.1 -- a known variable star
03:43:07.93 +42:17:01.9 -- not a known variable star
03:43:10.12 +42:13:49.2 -- not a known variable star
03:43:10.97 +41:12:32.7 -- not a known variable star
03:43:17.69 +41:48:19.4 -- not a known variable star
03:43:28.13 +41:11:18.9 -- not a known variable star
03:43:57.17 +41:52:04.7 -- not a known variable star
03:44:09.61 +41:43:08.2 -- not a known variable star
03:44:21.90 +42:19:20.3 -- not a known variable star
03:44:30.37 +41:48:29.3 -- not a known variable star
03:45:17.05 +42:19:07.3 -- not a known variable star
03:46:01.90 +42:19:24.2 -- not a known variable star
04:50:24.40 +33:00:50.3 -- not a known variable star
Found 18 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
19 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
03:41:53.98 +42:04:30.4
03:42:11.96 +41:56:47.5
03:42:21.95 +42:02:31.1
03:42:31.76 +41:03:10.3
03:42:49.88 +42:05:05.8
03:42:50.40 +41:46:35.9
03:43:02.40 +42:05:41.1
03:43:07.93 +42:17:01.9
03:43:10.12 +42:13:49.2
03:43:10.97 +41:12:32.7
03:43:17.69 +41:48:19.4
03:43:28.13 +41:11:18.9
03:43:57.17 +41:52:04.7
03:44:09.61 +41:43:08.2
03:44:21.90 +42:19:20.3
03:44:30.37 +41:48:29.3
03:45:17.05 +42:19:07.3
03:46:01.90 +42:19:24.2
04:50:24.40 +33:00:50.3
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461268.83714808 -observatory V36
08:56:54.60 +18:28:27.4 Mercury (-1.4mag)
12:30:37.41 -04:57:45.6 Venus (-4.4mag)
06:12:43.55 +23:42:29.2 Mars (1.3mag)
08:50:12.07 +18:13:48.4 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:55:38.70 +03:08:16.5 Saturn (0.6mag)
04:12:33.76 +20:59:06.1 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:15:34.85 +00:09:25.1 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:27:22.82 -23:33:10.5 Pluto (14.5mag)
12:27:57.88 -07:17:01.3 Moon (-9.2mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Aug 16 03:10 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461268.83714808:
08:50:15.03 +18:13:36.8 Io (6.1mag)
08:50:18.15 +18:13:21.6 Europa (6.3mag)
08:50:25.75 +18:12:45.5 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:50:12.71 +18:13:43.4 Callisto (6.8mag)
08:47:40.35 +18:18:09.6 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:50:10.26 +18:13:57.2 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:47:17.15 +18:15:06.8 Elara (17.7mag)
08:54:20.81 +17:49:35.6 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:52:50.14 +18:25:55.5 Carme (19.0mag)
00:55:49.08 +03:07:49.3 Titan (8.4mag)
00:55:35.82 +03:08:00.9 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:56:07.35 +03:08:45.5 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:55:51.44 +03:07:41.0 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:54:50.84 +03:00:25.3 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 16 03:10 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461268.83714808:
19:38:49.12 -18:22:37.8 JWST
15:59:12.94 +49:04:17.2 Chandra
10:41:38.18 -58:32:10.8 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 16 03:10 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461268.83714808 -observatory V36
03:22:26.10 +18:01:10.4 17.6mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:00:10.48 -34:33:17.2 14.1mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:01:12.52 -69:13:22.2 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:11:50.39 +33:10:11.1 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
04:06:20.39 +40:42:56.6 17.2mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:31:50.74 +30:53:20.4 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:51:22.18 +26:23:47.0 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:29:06.12 +28:06:35.1 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:34:17.90 +05:18:33.3 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:14:05.44 -12:36:55.3 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
21:00:23.19 +64:59:32.9 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:40:38.28 -13:41:12.4 14.5mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:16:59.50 +31:43:11.6 15.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:05:58.97 +15:33:37.5 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:53:21.01 +43:24:50.1 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:58:33.08 +49:34:56.3 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:21:25.92 -12:54:16.8 15.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:01:15.94 +22:42:35.1 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
10:44:24.60 +20:22:31.8 17.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:03:15.11 +01:47:33.5 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:04:49.48 +76:59:48.6 16.6mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:09:35.28 +46:18:48.2 17.2mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:53:36.89 +09:22:11.7 17.4mag A/2026 E1
22:06:46.30 -30:25:42.2 7.0mag 10P/Tempel
11:33:55.01 -03:54:55.5 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
11:24:12.50 +01:59:09.3 17.3mag 63P/Wild
00:53:10.58 -05:47:33.0 15.4mag 65P/Gunn
05:53:43.18 +20:29:26.6 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:30:44.29 -24:25:05.3 17.6mag 84P/Giclas
03:07:54.79 +14:13:44.4 16.8mag 88P/Howell
08:16:10.31 +26:30:28.9 16.3mag 93P/Lovas
04:29:35.79 +20:02:32.6 17.4mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
06:23:08.91 +29:17:12.9 16.2mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:37:38.39 +25:13:22.8 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley
12:00:06.00 -13:21:28.5 17.2mag 124P/Mrkos
05:48:20.50 +21:07:06.6 16.0mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:42:11.06 +18:28:14.1 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
00:01:35.69 +03:16:30.3 17.5mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:15:48.08 -18:51:23.8 13.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
07:43:48.81 +38:05:25.3 16.0mag 162P/Siding Spring
12:30:15.66 +38:07:34.8 12.0mag 169P/NEAT
02:57:02.40 +09:31:47.7 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
16:46:23.79 -10:41:22.4 17.9mag 235P/LINEAR
20:17:59.20 -52:26:36.5 17.9mag 259P/Garradd
03:45:48.35 +28:30:15.3 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
07:29:40.29 +37:26:01.4 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:13:27.95 +02:14:06.3 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski
09:08:16.72 +17:58:23.4 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.3K Aug 16 03:10 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 16 03:10 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 16 03:10 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
15:52:09.810 +21:23:36.58 AT 2026wur 2026-05-19.33 21.14
17:21:27.821 +31:45:59.75 AT 2026wuq 2026-07-24.44 20.99
16:06:39.962 -00:03:48.96 AT 2026wup 2026-07-08.37 20.6
23:36:31.132 -01:42:30.56 AT 2026wuo 2026-07-25.58 21.53
14:58:54.953 +20:56:59.36 AT 2026wun 2026-06-12.38 21.33
13:29:54.424 -08:02:17.84 AT 2026wum 2026-05-12.34 21.76
15:31:56.171 -23:07:56.50 AT 2026wul 2026-07-16.29 21.12
15:50:35.869 +16:13:29.04 AT 2026wuk 2026-06-08.46 20.66
14:46:52.387 +23:41:33.95 AT 2026wuj 2026-07-19.29 20.84
02:33:14.312 +23:53:11.23 AT 2026wui 2026-07-25.60 21.47
23:59:19.033 +30:37:28.65 AT 2026wuh 2026-07-23.54 21.33
16:12:22.633 +29:40:38.32 AT 2026wug 2026-05-17.56 21.06
22:44:11.171 +19:47:25.41 AT 2026wuf 2026-06-22.52 21.62
18:17:56.544 +19:41:21.89 SN 2026wue 2026-08-02.91 19.16
21:01:30.094 -22:58:14.18 AT 2026wud 2026-08-02.45 20.19
17:15:36.662 +19:40:23.08 AT 2026wuc 2026-08-02.89 19.57
21:28:21.020 -26:47:22.51 AT 2026wub 2026-08-01.60 19.12
22:35:35.158 -48:27:31.72 AT 2026wua 2026-07-27.55 19.31
13:33:02.514 +37:11:45.73 AT 2026wtz 2026-08-02.28 17.867
23:09:39.462 -49:07:04.71 AT 2026wty 2026-07-20.06 19.281
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 16 03:10 tns_transients_list.txt
