This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.1752 2461268.6752 10.96 03:44:14.66 +59:11:21.8
143.49605 3.40160 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J034414.68+591121.7
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.000 V 12.460 V 2457611.10000 56.700000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:44:14.66 +59:11:21.8: 11.85 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:44:14.66 +59:11:21.8: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.87 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J034414.68+591121.7,2461268.6752,10.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J034414.68+591121.7 20260816.1752 10.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.1752 2461268.6752 11.27 04:16:13.33 +60:11:06.5
145.89925 6.79582 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J041613.40+601105.9
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.900 V 13.420 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 04:16:13.33 +60:11:06.5: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 04:16:13.33 +60:11:06.5: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J041613.40+601105.9,2461268.6752,11.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J041613.40+601105.9 20260816.1752 11.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.1752 2461268.6752 11.69 03:58:30.49 +58:31:22.0
145.35151 4.04691 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J035830.70+583120.6
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.000 V 13.360 V 2458338.60850 63.315003300000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:58:30.49 +58:31:22.0: 12.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:58:30.49 +58:31:22.0: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J035830.70+583120.6,2461268.6752,11.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J035830.70+583120.6 20260816.1752 11.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.1752 2461268.6752 12.06 03:50:14.31 +58:34:15.7
144.48880 3.39508 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 6.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ZTF J035014.22+583415.4
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.320 r Y 0.154 r 2458338.97940 36.766736500000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:50:14.31 +58:34:15.7: 12.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:50:14.31 +58:34:15.7: 13.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J035014.22+583415.4,2461268.6752,12.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J035014.22+583415.4 20260816.1752 12.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.1752 2461268.6752 12.18 03:53:55.27 +57:35:56.7
145.48179 2.94953 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J058.4800+57.5988 | 03:53:55.21 +57:35:55.7 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: M1 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=1.423+/-0.028 (Very red! L if it's a dwarf)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:53:55.27 +57:35:56.7: 13.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:53:55.27 +57:35:56.7: 13.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J058.4800+57.5988,2461268.6752,12.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J058.4800+57.5988 20260816.1752 12.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.1752 2461268.6752 12.12 04:11:50.81 +58:31:40.4
146.64778 5.21375 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 6.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J041151.11+583140.9
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.049 r Y 0.654 r 2458452.60300 150.652429000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 04:11:50.81 +58:31:40.4: 13.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 04:11:50.81 +58:31:40.4: 13.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J041151.11+583140.9,2461268.6752,12.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J041151.11+583140.9 20260816.1752 12.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.1752 2461268.6752 12.46 03:37:49.59 +58:18:10.5
143.36308 2.19289 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J033749.49+581810.3
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.970 V 14.440 V 2458506.57980 70.037770800000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:37:49.59 +58:18:10.5: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:37:49.59 +58:18:10.5: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J033749.49+581810.3,2461268.6752,12.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J033749.49+581810.3 20260816.1752 12.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.1752 2461268.6752 12.43 03:50:40.24 +59:11:42.1
144.13974 3.91580 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 473319002475605120 | 03:50:40.19 +59:11:43.1 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: M4 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=1.506+/-0.030 (Very red! L if it's a dwarf)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:50:40.24 +59:11:42.1: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:50:40.24 +59:11:42.1: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 473319002475605120,2461268.6752,12.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 473319002475605120 20260816.1752 12.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.1752 2461268.6752 12.47 03:48:37.33 +58:48:45.7
144.17329 3.45254 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.0" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 03:48:37.33 +58:48:45.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: K4 (LAMOST DR5)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:48:37.33 +58:48:45.7: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:48:37.33 +58:48:45.7: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461268.6752,12.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260816.1752 12.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.1752 2461268.6752 12.41 03:59:31.73 +58:30:24.6
145.46329 4.12163 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was found in ASASSN-V 1" ASASSN-V J035931.84+583024.9
Type: SR
MeanMag 13.88 m Amp. 0.11 m Period 25.6247553 d
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:59:31.73 +58:30:24.6: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:59:31.73 +58:30:24.6: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461268.6752,12.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260816.1752 12.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.1752 2461268.6752 12.78 03:50:12.34 +58:55:05.5
144.26733 3.66282 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J057.5506+58.9180 | 03:50:12.15 +58:55:04.9 (Gaia DR3) | IRR (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=1.494+/-0.026 (Very red! L if it's a dwarf)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:50:12.34 +58:55:05.5: 13.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:50:12.34 +58:55:05.5: 13.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J057.5506+58.9180,2461268.6752,12.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J057.5506+58.9180 20260816.1752 12.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.1752 2461268.6752 12.65 03:49:06.39 +58:59:16.3
144.11288 3.62849 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J057.2768+58.9877 | 03:49:06.39 +58:59:16.3 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) J-Ks=1.361+/-0.029 (Very red! L if it's a dwarf)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:49:06.39 +58:59:16.3: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:49:06.39 +58:59:16.3: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J057.2768+58.9877,2461268.6752,12.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J057.2768+58.9877 20260816.1752 12.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.1752 2461268.6752 12.54 04:15:35.74 +59:58:24.8
145.99149 6.58972 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 7.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J041535.78+595825.1
Type: SRS
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.050 V 14.180 V 2457972.08000 21.071000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 04:15:35.74 +59:58:24.8: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 04:15:35.74 +59:58:24.8: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J041535.78+595825.1,2461268.6752,12.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J041535.78+595825.1 20260816.1752 12.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.1752 2461268.6752 12.56 03:58:39.89 +58:48:06.0
145.18517 4.27201 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ZTF J035839.85+584806.4
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.847 r Y 0.158 r 2458356.06600 34.514485200000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:58:39.89 +58:48:06.0: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:58:39.89 +58:48:06.0: 13.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J035839.85+584806.4,2461268.6752,12.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J035839.85+584806.4 20260816.1752 12.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.1752 2461268.6752 12.48 04:26:56.97 +60:19:23.7
146.74173 7.84037 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.1" and 7.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASASSN-V J042657.31+601922.7
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.160 V 14.400 V 2458337.78570 54.100913700000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 04:26:56.97 +60:19:23.7: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 04:26:56.97 +60:19:23.7: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J042657.31+601922.7,2461268.6752,12.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J042657.31+601922.7 20260816.1752 12.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.1752 2461268.6752 12.46 03:55:25.10 +59:37:17.9
144.33558 4.62903 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 6.6 pix
The object was found in VSX19" Gaia DR3 473348693591036928
Type: E
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
18.790 G 19.150 G 1.299000000000
ATTENTION: measured mag 12.46 is 6.3 mag brighter than the VSX record maximum brightness 18.79 - possible unusual activity of a known variable! (Alternatively, this may be a new object that coincides with the known variable's position just by chance.)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:55:25.10 +59:37:17.9: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:55:25.10 +59:37:17.9: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 473348693591036928,2461268.6752,12.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 473348693591036928 20260816.1752 12.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.1752 2461268.6752 12.35 04:10:25.36 +60:50:59.8
144.91722 6.78290 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 6.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J041025.54+605100.8
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.630 V 13.780 V 2457711.00000 881.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 04:10:25.36 +60:50:59.8: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 04:10:25.36 +60:50:59.8: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J041025.54+605100.8,2461268.6752,12.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J041025.54+605100.8 20260816.1752 12.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.1752 2461268.6752 12.43 04:09:44.29 +58:19:15.5
146.58716 4.87410 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.1" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J062.4353+58.3211 | 04:09:44.48 +58:19:16.2 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: B6 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=1.452+/-0.031 (Very red! L if it's a dwarf)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 04:09:44.29 +58:19:15.5: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 04:09:44.29 +58:19:15.5: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J062.4353+58.3211,2461268.6752,12.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J062.4353+58.3211 20260816.1752 12.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.1752 2461268.6752 12.31 03:55:37.36 +58:05:36.3
145.33954 3.47435 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 470011499702100736 | 03:55:37.74 +58:05:36.8 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:55:37.36 +58:05:36.3: 13.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:55:37.36 +58:05:36.3: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 470011499702100736,2461268.6752,12.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 470011499702100736 20260816.1752 12.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.1752 2461268.6752 11.79 03:31:51.45 +57:04:09.1
143.43305 0.72549 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 448657682517505536 | 03:31:51.47 +57:04:08.1 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: M3 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=1.697+/-0.025 (Very red! L if it's a dwarf)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:31:51.45 +57:04:09.1: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:31:51.45 +57:04:09.1: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 448657682517505536,2461268.6752,11.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 448657682517505536 20260816.1752 11.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.1752 2461268.6752 12.93 03:48:02.04 +59:21:27.0
143.77447 3.83215 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.4" and 6.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J034801.76+592126.7
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.320 g Y 0.600 g 2458932.62700 72.640000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:48:02.04 +59:21:27.0: 14.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:48:02.04 +59:21:27.0: 14.41 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J034801.76+592126.7,2461268.6752,12.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J034801.76+592126.7 20260816.1752 12.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.58702274 09.01.2026 02:05:08.765 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
First image: 2461049.58702274 09.01.2026 02:05:08.765 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Last image: 2461268.67550419 16.08.2026 04:12:33.562 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 19910
Objects passed selection criteria: 19752
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12612.8
Average stars matched: 12191.5 (96.6601 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 244552 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 16 00:16:07 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.58702274 09.01.2026 02:05:08.765 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
First image: 2461049.58702274 09.01.2026 02:05:08.765 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Last image: 2461268.67550419 16.08.2026 04:12:33.562 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 120
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 224 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 142788
Objects passed selection criteria: 142331
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 92106.2
Average stars matched: 87726.5 (95.2449 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 541792 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 16 00:22:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461268.67488293
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:37.114 +62:00:13.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Image size: 943.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:34.702 +61:58:01.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:37.114 +62:00:13.38
Second-epoch image center 03:25:34.702 +61:58:01.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0369 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Image size: 943.8'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:34.166 +61:57:23.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:37.114 +62:00:13.38
Second-epoch image center 03:25:34.166 +61:57:23.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0476 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:25:34.702 +61:58:01.81
Second-epoch second image center 03:25:34.166 +61:57:23.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01077 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EB9FDrSeeh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TtFp7yJTj3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Y20uLozvt9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JfEneznuB5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits and wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits and wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits and wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 20930 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 31.3226 to 69.7061 deg, Dec +55.1703 to +67.5013 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 31.3226 to 69.7061 deg, Dec 55.1703 to 67.5013 deg
Loaded 17765 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9567 out of 10596 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10596 out of 20930 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.961600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.961600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 20930 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 31.3226 to 69.7061 deg, Dec +55.1703 to +67.5013 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 31.3226 to 69.7061 deg, Dec 55.1703 to 67.5013 deg
Loaded 17765 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9567 out of 10596 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10596 out of 20930 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 20729 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 31.2965 to 69.9351 deg, Dec +55.2344 to +67.5141 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 31.2965 to 69.9351 deg, Dec 55.2344 to 67.5141 deg
Loaded 17774 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9548 out of 10598 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10598 out of 20729 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
2.0 pix Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
2.9 pix fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
2.9 pix fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
15.4 mag. Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
12.9 mag. fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
13.0 mag. fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.9 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.EB9FDrSeeh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2177, bad_region=0, passed=20929
Got 20929 stars (including 18725 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20929 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5398)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.314 n_q1=1299 n_q2=1255 n_q3=1372 n_q4=983 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.215
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits -region wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TtFp7yJTj3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2180, bad_region=0, passed=20729
Got 20729 stars (including 18522 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20729 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5396)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=1298 n_q2=1253 n_q3=1379 n_q4=976 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.256
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits -region wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Y20uLozvt9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=200, bad_region=0, passed=4546
Got 4546 stars (including 4342 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4546 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013110 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010488 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4256 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4222 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4224 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4222 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4546 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4257 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4227 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4546 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4227 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4546 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4227 stars left (next iteration limit 4644)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4227 robust_rms=10.571 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=28.474 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4227 robust_rms=0.634 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.922 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4227 robust_rms=0.503 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.671 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4227 robust_rms_before=1.262 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.502 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.503 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.609 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.671
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.609 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits N_match=4227 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.637 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.583 n_q1=1158 n_q2=1010 n_q3=1424 n_q4=635 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.298
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JfEneznuB5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=181, bad_region=0, passed=4550
Got 4550 stars (including 4362 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4550 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013108 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010487 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4276 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4240 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4241 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4240 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4550 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4276 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4245 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4550 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4245 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4550 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4245 stars left (next iteration limit 4664)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4245 robust_rms=10.393 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=29.040 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4245 robust_rms=0.639 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.430 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4245 robust_rms=0.489 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.671 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4245 robust_rms_before=1.272 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.499 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.489 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.617 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.671
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.617 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits N_match=4245 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.625 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.532 n_q1=1154 n_q2=988 n_q3=1449 n_q4=654 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.332
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits sigma_overall=0.380 worst_q_ratio=1.215
ref2=Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits sigma_overall=0.390 worst_q_ratio=1.256
new1=fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits sigma_overall=0.491 worst_q_ratio=1.298
new2=fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits sigma_overall=0.469 worst_q_ratio=1.332
reference average sigma_overall=0.385 worst_q_ratio=1.2355
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026_astrometric_residuals.png (4909 matched stars from wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027_astrometric_residuals.png (4906 matched stars from wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118_astrometric_residuals.png (4227 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119_astrometric_residuals.png (4245 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:37.114 +62:00:13.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Image size: 943.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:34.702 +61:58:01.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:37.114 +62:00:13.38
Second-epoch image center 03:25:34.702 +61:58:01.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0369 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Image size: 943.8'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:34.166 +61:57:23.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:37.114 +62:00:13.38
Second-epoch image center 03:25:34.166 +61:57:23.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0476 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:25:34.702 +61:58:01.81
Second-epoch second image center 03:25:34.166 +61:57:23.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01077 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cFQYODKatP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uUrzDOL07Y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fiXPebZE3x
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VFvqdxaCTA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits and wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits and wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits and wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 154964 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 31.2692 to 69.9743 deg, Dec +55.1703 to +67.5041 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 31.2692 to 69.9743 deg, Dec 55.1703 to 67.5041 deg
Loaded 17913 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7812 out of 10796 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10796 out of 154964 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.824500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.824500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 154964 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 31.2692 to 69.9743 deg, Dec +55.1703 to +67.5041 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 31.2692 to 69.9743 deg, Dec 55.1703 to 67.5041 deg
Loaded 17913 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7812 out of 10796 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10796 out of 154964 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 154983 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 31.2689 to 69.9719 deg, Dec +55.1748 to +67.5161 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 31.2689 to 69.9719 deg, Dec 55.1748 to 67.5161 deg
Loaded 17915 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7797 out of 10804 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10804 out of 154983 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 109 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
1.8 pix Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
2.8 pix fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
2.8 pix fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
15.6 mag. Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 13.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.cFQYODKatP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=17688, bad_region=2, passed=154936
Got 154936 stars (including 136983 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 154936 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4910 stars left (next iteration limit 5401)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits N_match=4910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=1285 n_q2=1224 n_q3=1363 n_q4=1038 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.172
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits -region wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uUrzDOL07Y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=30, blended=17825, bad_region=1, passed=154953
Got 154953 stars (including 136846 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 154953 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5394)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=1278 n_q2=1226 n_q3=1354 n_q4=1046 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits -region wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fiXPebZE3x (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1011, bad_region=3, passed=30117
Got 30117 stars (including 29040 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30117 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013110 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010488 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30117 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30117 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30117 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4864 stars left (next iteration limit 5347)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4864 robust_rms=10.070 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=30.470 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4864 robust_rms=0.632 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.949 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4864 robust_rms=0.507 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.679 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4864 robust_rms_before=1.260 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.503 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.507 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.618 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.679
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.618 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits N_match=4864 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.630 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.553 n_q1=1307 n_q2=1111 n_q3=1723 n_q4=723 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.261
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VFvqdxaCTA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1029, bad_region=3, passed=30570
Got 30570 stars (including 29474 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30570 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013108 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010487 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4856 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30570 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30570 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30570 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4858 stars left (next iteration limit 5340)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4858 robust_rms=9.964 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=29.608 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4858 robust_rms=0.633 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.381 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4858 robust_rms=0.498 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.680 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4858 robust_rms_before=1.274 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.509 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.498 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.617 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.680
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.617 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits N_match=4858 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.628 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.527 n_q1=1300 n_q2=1087 n_q3=1727 n_q4=744 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.290
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-11-39_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0118.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_232249_TTUQ1b1x1_2170952_phQ5Gh1P/wcs_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 02:27:27.28 +58:19:54.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 02:22:03.35 +61:01:33.1: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 02:25:29.10 +59:01:45.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 02:46:54.71 +63:00:15.7: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 02:27:27.28 +58:19:54.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:27:27.28 +58:19:54.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 02:22:03.35 +61:01:33.1: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:22:03.35 +61:01:33.1: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8764 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 02:25:36.33 +58:58:55.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 02:25:29.10 +59:01:45.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:25:29.10 +59:01:45.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 02:46:54.71 +63:00:15.7: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:46:54.71 +63:00:15.7: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7646 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 02:25:36.33 +58:58:55.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:25:36.33 +58:58:55.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:44:14.66 +59:11:21.8: 11.85 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 04:16:13.33 +60:11:06.5: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:44:14.66 +59:11:21.8: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.87 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:44:14.66 +59:11:21.8: ref_mag=11.87 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9555 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:58:30.49 +58:31:22.0: 12.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 04:16:13.33 +60:11:06.5: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:16:13.33 +60:11:06.5: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2710 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:50:14.31 +58:34:15.7: 12.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:58:30.49 +58:31:22.0: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:58:30.49 +58:31:22.0: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6873 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:50:14.31 +58:34:15.7: 13.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:50:14.31 +58:34:15.7: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0567 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:53:55.27 +57:35:56.7: 13.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 04:11:50.81 +58:31:40.4: 13.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:53:55.27 +57:35:56.7: 13.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:53:55.27 +57:35:56.7: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1421 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 04:11:50.81 +58:31:40.4: 13.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:11:50.81 +58:31:40.4: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1193 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:50:40.24 +59:11:42.1: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:37:49.59 +58:18:10.5: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:50:40.24 +59:11:42.1: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:50:40.24 +59:11:42.1: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4319 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:48:37.33 +58:48:45.7: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:37:49.59 +58:18:10.5: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:37:49.59 +58:18:10.5: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4558 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:48:37.33 +58:48:45.7: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:48:37.33 +58:48:45.7: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4600 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:59:31.73 +58:30:24.6: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:59:31.73 +58:30:24.6: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:59:31.73 +58:30:24.6: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4085 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 02:31:09.10 +64:46:55.2: 13.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 02:31:09.10 +64:46:55.2: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:31:09.10 +64:46:55.2: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5945 delta=0.83 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:50:12.34 +58:55:05.5: 13.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:49:06.39 +58:59:16.3: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:50:12.34 +58:55:05.5: 13.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:50:12.34 +58:55:05.5: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7232 delta=1.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 04:15:35.74 +59:58:24.8: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:58:39.89 +58:48:06.0: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:49:06.39 +58:59:16.3: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:49:06.39 +58:59:16.3: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6392 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 04:15:35.74 +59:58:24.8: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:15:35.74 +59:58:24.8: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5036 delta=1.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:58:39.89 +58:48:06.0: 13.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:58:39.89 +58:48:06.0: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5493 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 04:26:56.97 +60:19:23.7: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:55:25.10 +59:37:17.9: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 04:26:56.97 +60:19:23.7: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:26:56.97 +60:19:23.7: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4726 delta=1.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:55:25.10 +59:37:17.9: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:55:25.10 +59:37:17.9: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4490 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 04:10:25.36 +60:50:59.8: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 04:10:25.36 +60:50:59.8: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:10:25.36 +60:50:59.8: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3590 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 04:09:44.29 +58:19:15.5: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:55:37.36 +58:05:36.3: 13.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 04:09:44.29 +58:19:15.5: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:09:44.29 +58:19:15.5: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4269 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:55:37.36 +58:05:36.3: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:55:37.36 +58:05:36.3: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2958 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:31:51.45 +57:04:09.1: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:31:51.45 +57:04:09.1: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:31:51.45 +57:04:09.1: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7858 delta=1.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 02:31:39.30 +65:05:14.3: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 02:31:39.30 +65:05:14.3: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:31:39.30 +65:05:14.3: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1669 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits at 03:48:02.04 +59:21:27.0: 14.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-05-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits at 03:48:02.04 +59:21:27.0: 14.41 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:48:02.04 +59:21:27.0: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9051 delta=1.37 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out04719.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out09520.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out16258.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out19921.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20900.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out22132.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out22513.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out23249.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out23617.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out26601.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out27215.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out28543.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out29600.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33005.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34062.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36147.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out39901.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out47151.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51682.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56037.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out62362.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 34s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 16s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179107_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 179107_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:33:20.55 +61:32:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179488_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 179488_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180458_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 180458_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:16.12 +58:13:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180490_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 180490_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:23:23.64 +63:36:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180703_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 180703_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:37:22.05 +64:05:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180715_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 180715_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:05.86 +58:50:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180759_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 180759_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:27:50.12 +62:54:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180783_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 180783_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:57.85 +60:45:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180840_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 180840_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:43.89 +59:09:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180850_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 180850_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:31:32.64 +58:00:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180919_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 180919_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:38:46.04 +62:35:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180934_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 180934_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180940_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 180940_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:16:36.13 +64:57:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180958_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 180958_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:47:26.85 +63:58:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181040_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 181040_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:46:34.25 +63:01:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181051_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 181051_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:51.51 +62:41:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181169_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 181169_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181317_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 181317_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:25:50.48 +61:32:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181332_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 181332_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181722_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 181722_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:56:03.88 +61:32:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181780_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 181780_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:21:28.96 +63:55:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181906_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 181906_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182058_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 182058_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34637_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 34637_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:26.81 +59:09:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62763_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 62763_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:47.47 +60:44:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121002_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 121002_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:30.97 +65:31:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65468_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 65468_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:07.82 +61:06:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33497_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 33497_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:29:54.59 +58:52:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131843_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 131843_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:56:33.37 +63:58:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34062_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
Preparing report for the candidate 34062_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49733_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 49733_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:47:43.16 +60:06:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57662_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 57662_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:22.27 +60:32:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51682_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
Preparing report for the candidate 51682_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133723_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 133723_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:20:33.05 +62:32:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116092_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 116092_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:33:24.45 +64:25:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40643_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 40643_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:05.42 +59:34:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25542_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 25542_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:38.97 +58:42:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34871_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 34871_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:00:52.00 +59:18:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22513_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
Preparing report for the candidate 22513_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139570_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 139570_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:30:28.37 +62:31:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35241_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 35241_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:30.01 +59:19:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42918_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 42918_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:38:09.74 +59:40:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23617_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
Preparing report for the candidate 23617_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23337_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 23337_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:40:06.87 +58:29:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37368_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 37368_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:11.13 +59:27:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25199_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 25199_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:25.16 +58:41:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09520_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
Preparing report for the candidate 09520_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23249_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
Preparing report for the candidate 23249_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51568_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 51568_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:47:34.85 +60:15:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35484_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 35484_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:10.34 +59:20:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18596_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 18596_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:40:20.05 +58:10:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09017_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 09017_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:08.50 +57:19:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20900_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
Preparing report for the candidate 20900_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33005_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
Preparing report for the candidate 33005_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129292_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 129292_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:18:53.09 +62:48:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27215_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
Preparing report for the candidate 27215_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22132_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
Preparing report for the candidate 22132_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32609_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 32609_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:40:19.74 +59:05:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109658_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 109658_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112236_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 112236_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:43:35.20 +65:01:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23137_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 23137_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:14:55.17 +58:31:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16023_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 16023_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:37:29.40 +57:58:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08981_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 08981_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:08.67 +57:30:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28543_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
Preparing report for the candidate 28543_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81994_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 81994_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:41:00.90 +62:02:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29600_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
Preparing report for the candidate 29600_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47151_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
Preparing report for the candidate 47151_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26601_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
Preparing report for the candidate 26601_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136471_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 136471_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:37:09.74 +64:20:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74112_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 74112_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:15.25 +61:33:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35027_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 35027_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:46:04.81 +59:17:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22824_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 22824_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:24.24 +58:32:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56037_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
Preparing report for the candidate 56037_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39901_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
Preparing report for the candidate 39901_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12902_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 12902_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:28.69 +57:46:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28959_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 28959_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:46:59.19 +58:55:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62362_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
Preparing report for the candidate 62362_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19921_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
Preparing report for the candidate 19921_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16258_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
Preparing report for the candidate 16258_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17463_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 17463_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:04.06 +58:10:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102311_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 102311_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:37:10.01 +61:55:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58275_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 58275_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:25.81 +60:39:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18875_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 18875_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:31.20 +58:14:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04719_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
Preparing report for the candidate 04719_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12704_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 12704_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:28.84 +57:43:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20010_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 20010_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:40.02 +58:17:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23341_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 23341_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:14:09.51 +58:31:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04793_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 04793_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:57.52 +57:16:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12118_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 12118_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:07.92 +57:38:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118683_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 118683_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27793_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 27793_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:23.84 +58:48:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36147_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
Preparing report for the candidate 36147_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10564_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 10564_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:56.72 +57:38:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25593_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 25593_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:41.14 +58:40:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21190_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 21190_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:41.82 +58:23:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95476_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 95476_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:21:41.56 +60:54:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14086_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 14086_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:07.46 +57:52:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39841_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 39841_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:50:55.93 +59:35:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51766_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 51766_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:29:04.00 +59:56:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128048_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 128048_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:40.53 +64:35:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48629_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 48629_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:42.52 +59:58:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41779_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 41779_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:10.49 +59:38:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16583_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 16583_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:33:41.14 +57:52:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47347_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 47347_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:27.41 +59:54:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16752_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 16752_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:43.39 +57:58:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43732_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 43732_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:58.06 +59:36:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09639_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 09639_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:01.76 +57:27:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124333_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 124333_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:39.97 +65:08:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15632_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119
The candidate 15632_fd_Cam-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_23-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:08.12 +57:51:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 7s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 57s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
03:31:51.45 +57:04:09.1
03:53:55.27 +57:35:56.7
03:55:37.36 +58:05:36.3
04:09:44.29 +58:19:15.5
03:37:49.59 +58:18:10.5
03:59:31.73 +58:30:24.6
03:58:30.49 +58:31:22.0
04:11:50.81 +58:31:40.4
03:50:14.31 +58:34:15.7
03:58:39.89 +58:48:06.0
03:48:37.33 +58:48:45.7
03:50:12.34 +58:55:05.5
03:49:06.39 +58:59:16.3
03:50:40.24 +59:11:42.1
03:44:14.66 +59:11:21.8
03:48:02.04 +59:21:27.0
03:55:25.10 +59:37:17.9
04:15:35.74 +59:58:24.8
04:16:13.33 +60:11:06.5
04:26:56.97 +60:19:23.7
04:10:25.36 +60:50:59.8
########### Completed Cam-08-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
03:44:14.66 +59:11:21.8
04:16:13.33 +60:11:06.5
03:58:30.49 +58:31:22.0
03:50:14.31 +58:34:15.7
03:53:55.27 +57:35:56.7
04:11:50.81 +58:31:40.4
03:37:49.59 +58:18:10.5
03:50:40.24 +59:11:42.1
03:48:37.33 +58:48:45.7
03:59:31.73 +58:30:24.6
03:50:12.34 +58:55:05.5
03:49:06.39 +58:59:16.3
04:15:35.74 +59:58:24.8
03:58:39.89 +58:48:06.0
04:26:56.97 +60:19:23.7
03:55:25.10 +59:37:17.9
04:10:25.36 +60:50:59.8
04:09:44.29 +58:19:15.5
03:55:37.36 +58:05:36.3
03:31:51.45 +57:04:09.1
03:48:02.04 +59:21:27.0
###################################################################################
03:44:14.66 +59:11:21.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
04:16:13.33 +60:11:06.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
03:58:30.49 +58:31:22.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
03:50:14.31 +58:34:15.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
03:53:55.27 +57:35:56.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
04:11:50.81 +58:31:40.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
03:37:49.59 +58:18:10.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
03:50:40.24 +59:11:42.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
03:48:37.33 +58:48:45.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
03:59:31.73 +58:30:24.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
03:50:12.34 +58:55:05.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
03:49:06.39 +58:59:16.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
04:15:35.74 +59:58:24.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
03:58:39.89 +58:48:06.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
04:26:56.97 +60:19:23.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
03:55:25.10 +59:37:17.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
04:10:25.36 +60:50:59.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
04:09:44.29 +58:19:15.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
03:55:37.36 +58:05:36.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
03:31:51.45 +57:04:09.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
03:48:02.04 +59:21:27.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
03:31:51.45 +57:04:09.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
03:37:49.59 +58:18:10.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
03:44:14.66 +59:11:21.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
03:48:02.04 +59:21:27.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
03:48:37.33 +58:48:45.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
03:49:06.39 +58:59:16.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
03:50:12.34 +58:55:05.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
03:50:14.31 +58:34:15.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
03:50:40.24 +59:11:42.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
03:53:55.27 +57:35:56.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
03:55:25.10 +59:37:17.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
03:55:37.36 +58:05:36.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
03:58:30.49 +58:31:22.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
03:58:39.89 +58:48:06.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
03:59:31.73 +58:30:24.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
04:09:44.29 +58:19:15.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
04:10:25.36 +60:50:59.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
04:11:50.81 +58:31:40.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
04:15:35.74 +59:58:24.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
04:16:13.33 +60:11:06.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
04:26:56.97 +60:19:23.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
03:31:51.45 +57:04:09.1 -- not a known variable star
03:37:49.59 +58:18:10.5 -- a known variable star
03:44:14.66 +59:11:21.8 -- a known variable star
03:48:02.04 +59:21:27.0 -- a known variable star
03:48:37.33 +58:48:45.7 -- not a known variable star
03:49:06.39 +58:59:16.3 -- not a known variable star
03:50:12.34 +58:55:05.5 -- not a known variable star
03:50:14.31 +58:34:15.7 -- a known variable star
03:50:40.24 +59:11:42.1 -- not a known variable star
03:53:55.27 +57:35:56.7 -- not a known variable star
03:55:25.10 +59:37:17.9 -- a known variable star
03:55:37.36 +58:05:36.3 -- not a known variable star
03:58:30.49 +58:31:22.0 -- a known variable star
03:58:39.89 +58:48:06.0 -- a known variable star
03:59:31.73 +58:30:24.6 -- a known variable star
04:09:44.29 +58:19:15.5 -- not a known variable star
04:10:25.36 +60:50:59.8 -- a known variable star
04:11:50.81 +58:31:40.4 -- a known variable star
04:15:35.74 +59:58:24.8 -- a known variable star
04:16:13.33 +60:11:06.5 -- a known variable star
04:26:56.97 +60:19:23.7 -- a known variable star
Found 8 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
21 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
03:31:51.45 +57:04:09.1
03:37:49.59 +58:18:10.5
03:44:14.66 +59:11:21.8
03:48:02.04 +59:21:27.0
03:48:37.33 +58:48:45.7
03:49:06.39 +58:59:16.3
03:50:12.34 +58:55:05.5
03:50:14.31 +58:34:15.7
03:50:40.24 +59:11:42.1
03:53:55.27 +57:35:56.7
03:55:25.10 +59:37:17.9
03:55:37.36 +58:05:36.3
03:58:30.49 +58:31:22.0
03:58:39.89 +58:48:06.0
03:59:31.73 +58:30:24.6
04:09:44.29 +58:19:15.5
04:10:25.36 +60:50:59.8
04:11:50.81 +58:31:40.4
04:15:35.74 +59:58:24.8
04:16:13.33 +60:11:06.5
04:26:56.97 +60:19:23.7
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461268.67488293 -observatory V36
08:55:36.66 +18:32:24.6 Mercury (-1.4mag)
12:30:04.54 -04:53:08.5 Venus (-4.4mag)
06:12:15.41 +23:42:28.4 Mars (1.3mag)
08:50:03.35 +18:14:21.8 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:55:39.87 +03:08:26.4 Saturn (0.6mag)
04:12:32.87 +20:59:03.7 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:15:35.53 +00:09:29.9 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:27:23.73 -23:33:07.0 Pluto (14.5mag)
12:18:31.41 -06:22:54.4 Moon (-9.2mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Aug 16 00:16 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461268.67488293:
08:50:02.79 +18:14:26.0 Io (6.1mag)
08:50:11.68 +18:13:44.8 Europa (6.3mag)
08:50:18.30 +18:13:13.5 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:50:05.68 +18:14:09.2 Callisto (6.8mag)
08:47:31.68 +18:18:37.0 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:50:05.39 +18:14:13.8 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:47:08.40 +18:15:36.0 Elara (17.7mag)
08:54:12.09 +17:50:13.2 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:52:42.09 +18:26:26.5 Carme (19.0mag)
00:55:49.83 +03:07:57.8 Titan (8.4mag)
00:55:35.92 +03:08:13.0 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:56:08.25 +03:08:53.2 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:55:52.21 +03:07:49.9 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:54:52.23 +03:00:36.3 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 16 00:16 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461268.67488293:
19:38:50.37 -18:30:08.1 JWST
15:23:31.20 +53:48:19.6 Chandra
09:16:51.87 -52:16:51.4 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 16 00:16 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461268.67488293 -observatory V36
03:22:16.16 +18:00:26.3 17.6mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:00:11.71 -34:33:24.9 14.1mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:01:03.71 -69:12:57.2 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:11:48.11 +33:09:57.9 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
04:05:54.60 +40:39:41.3 17.2mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:31:59.07 +30:54:05.8 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:51:12.91 +26:23:57.5 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:28:56.99 +28:07:00.7 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:34:11.33 +05:18:33.6 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:14:03.15 -12:36:30.7 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
21:00:35.23 +65:00:55.6 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:40:45.83 -13:40:19.5 14.5mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:16:48.99 +31:42:43.9 15.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:05:59.73 +15:33:42.5 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:53:32.27 +43:24:36.8 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:58:48.00 +49:34:38.7 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:21:18.61 -12:54:18.7 15.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:01:10.14 +22:44:20.4 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
10:44:10.38 +20:23:11.7 17.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:03:08.60 +01:48:15.1 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:04:43.59 +77:00:56.4 16.6mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:09:33.86 +46:18:40.4 17.2mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:53:28.44 +09:21:15.9 17.4mag A/2026 E1
22:06:38.04 -30:22:16.7 7.0mag 10P/Tempel
11:33:48.89 -03:54:17.1 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
11:23:52.60 +02:02:20.2 17.3mag 63P/Wild
00:53:12.64 -05:47:04.8 15.4mag 65P/Gunn
05:53:21.60 +20:29:46.2 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:30:53.04 -24:24:05.2 17.6mag 84P/Giclas
03:07:47.27 +14:13:09.7 16.8mag 88P/Howell
08:15:46.46 +26:31:55.6 16.3mag 93P/Lovas
04:29:07.07 +19:58:41.4 17.4mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
06:22:37.01 +29:18:38.4 16.2mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:37:15.43 +25:15:09.7 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley
11:59:45.97 -13:17:49.0 17.2mag 124P/Mrkos
05:48:06.55 +21:07:12.9 16.0mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:41:54.87 +18:28:47.6 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
00:01:38.56 +03:16:44.0 17.5mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:15:55.71 -18:51:44.4 13.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
07:43:16.02 +38:05:14.6 16.0mag 162P/Siding Spring
12:33:08.47 +38:19:02.6 12.0mag 169P/NEAT
02:56:46.69 +09:31:53.7 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
16:46:17.39 -10:40:39.1 17.9mag 235P/LINEAR
20:18:03.95 -52:27:25.2 17.9mag 259P/Garradd
03:45:19.87 +28:26:20.3 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
07:29:11.27 +37:26:28.8 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:13:23.91 +02:15:12.1 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski
09:08:07.82 +17:58:52.8 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.3K Aug 16 00:16 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 16 00:16 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 16 00:16 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
16:06:39.962 -00:03:48.96 AT 2026wup 2026-07-08.37 20.6
23:36:31.132 -01:42:30.56 AT 2026wuo 2026-07-25.58 21.53
14:58:54.953 +20:56:59.36 AT 2026wun 2026-06-12.38 21.33
13:29:54.424 -08:02:17.84 AT 2026wum 2026-05-12.34 21.76
15:31:56.171 -23:07:56.50 AT 2026wul 2026-07-16.29 21.12
15:50:35.869 +16:13:29.04 AT 2026wuk 2026-06-08.46 20.66
14:46:52.387 +23:41:33.95 AT 2026wuj 2026-07-19.29 20.84
02:33:14.312 +23:53:11.23 AT 2026wui 2026-07-25.60 21.47
23:59:19.033 +30:37:28.65 AT 2026wuh 2026-07-23.54 21.33
16:12:22.633 +29:40:38.32 AT 2026wug 2026-05-17.56 21.06
22:44:11.171 +19:47:25.41 AT 2026wuf 2026-06-22.52 21.62
18:17:56.544 +19:41:21.89 SN 2026wue 2026-08-02.91 19.16
21:01:30.094 -22:58:14.18 AT 2026wud 2026-08-02.45 20.19
17:15:36.662 +19:40:23.08 AT 2026wuc 2026-08-02.89 19.57
21:28:21.020 -26:47:22.51 AT 2026wub 2026-08-01.60 19.12
22:35:35.158 -48:27:31.72 AT 2026wua 2026-07-27.55 19.31
13:33:02.514 +37:11:45.73 AT 2026wtz 2026-08-02.28 17.867
23:09:39.462 -49:07:04.71 AT 2026wty 2026-07-20.06 19.281
14:29:17.771 +16:10:51.48 AT 2026wtx 2026-07-31.26 18.842
01:29:50.326 -68:28:41.35 AT 2026wtw 2026-07-20.16 18.685
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 16 00:16 tns_transients_list.txt
