This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4563 2461267.9563 12.96 07:08:12.44 +17:43:27.0
198.79951 11.58326 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.202 Chryseis 1 -1 2 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:08:12.44 +17:43:27.0: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:08:12.44 +17:43:27.0: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.9563,12.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.4563 12.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4563 2461267.9563 13.43 06:43:04.17 +15:15:28.4
198.37974 5.08617 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.444 Gyptis -1 -0 1 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:43:04.17 +15:15:28.4: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:43:04.17 +15:15:28.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.9563,13.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.4563 13.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4563 2461267.9563 13.38 07:04:59.64 +13:33:11.3
202.28938 9.09112 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.5 pix
The object was found in VSX20" Gaia DR3 3161365482009093248
Type: E
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
18.800 G 19.160 G 0.230759000000
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the variable-star record above, but is consistent with the asteroid identification below - so this is likely the asteroid rather than an outburst of the variable.
The object was found in astcheck.85 Io -0 -0 0 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:04:59.64 +13:33:11.3: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:04:59.64 +13:33:11.3: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3161365482009093248,2461267.9563,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3161365482009093248 20260815.4563 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4563 2461267.9563 12.46 07:21:44.05 +11:24:40.4
206.05614 11.84147 galactic CMi Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 8.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J072144.19+112440.3
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.890 V 14.400 V 2456598.00000 217.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:21:44.05 +11:24:40.4: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:21:44.05 +11:24:40.4: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J072144.19+112440.3,2461267.9563,12.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J072144.19+112440.3 20260815.4563 12.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
First image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Last image: 2461267.95659225 15.08.2026 10:57:19.570 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.76
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 16693
Objects passed selection criteria: 16641
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 14067
Average stars matched: 12948.8 (92.0505 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 246460 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 15 06:28:49 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
First image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Last image: 2461267.95659225 15.08.2026 10:57:19.570 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 166
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 39 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 132961
Objects passed selection criteria: 132616
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 114780
Average stars matched: 106916 (93.148 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 621188 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 15 06:30:07 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461267.95590890
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits
Image size: 940.8'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.252 +13:57:36.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:41.252 +13:57:36.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0464 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
Image size: 940.7'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:38.849 +13:57:00.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:38.849 +13:57:00.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0576 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:41.252 +13:57:36.38
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:38.849 +13:57:00.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01390 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OVuI1KItAZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ignTgmBr6G
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WPGob2aLpx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SJyhG6fxys
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec +8.4645 to +19.3418 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec 8.4645 to 19.3418 deg
Loaded 18986 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13831 out of 15584 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15584 out of 28861 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.899900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.899900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.76
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.14
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.14
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec +8.4645 to +19.3418 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2644 to 114.8201 deg, Dec 8.4645 to 19.3418 deg
Loaded 18986 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13831 out of 15584 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15584 out of 28861 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 25465 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3404 to 114.8465 deg, Dec +8.5626 to +19.2813 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3404 to 114.8465 deg, Dec 8.5626 to 19.2813 deg
Loaded 18669 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13893 out of 14989 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14989 out of 25465 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.5 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
14.9 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.OVuI1KItAZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3379, bad_region=5272, passed=28861
Got 28861 stars (including 20681 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24724 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24724 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24724 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4791 stars left (next iteration limit 5273)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=4791 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.564 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.393 n_q1=1616 n_q2=831 n_q3=1614 n_q4=730 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.171
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ignTgmBr6G (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=7, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2216, bad_region=6781, passed=25458
Got 25458 stars (including 16979 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25458 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20310 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4841 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20310 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20310 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 4792 stars left (next iteration limit 5273)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=4792 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.601 n_q1=1243 n_q2=1063 n_q3=1368 n_q4=1118 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.169
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WPGob2aLpx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=568, bad_region=1096, passed=8365
Got 8365 stars (including 6741 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8365 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4836 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4770 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7511 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7511 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7511 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 4768 stars left (next iteration limit 5244)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4768 robust_rms=5.294 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.001 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4768 robust_rms=0.654 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.700 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4768 robust_rms=0.534 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.567 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4768 robust_rms_before=1.406 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.556 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.534 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.607 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.567
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.607 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits N_match=4768 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.565 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.630 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.611 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.516 n_q1=1742 n_q2=624 n_q3=1735 n_q4=667 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SJyhG6fxys (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=561, bad_region=1104, passed=8181
Got 8181 stars (including 6553 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8181 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4773 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4835 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4770 stars left (next iteration limit 5248)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4770 robust_rms=5.285 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.736 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4770 robust_rms=0.618 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.657 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4770 robust_rms=0.555 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.571 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4770 robust_rms_before=1.324 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.569 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.555 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.605 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.571
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.605 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits N_match=4770 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.635 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.616 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.536 n_q1=1724 n_q2=629 n_q3=1750 n_q4=667 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.097
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits sigma_overall=0.481 worst_q_ratio=1.171
ref2=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits sigma_overall=0.514 worst_q_ratio=1.169
new1=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits sigma_overall=0.565 worst_q_ratio=1.114
new2=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits sigma_overall=0.579 worst_q_ratio=1.097
reference average sigma_overall=0.4975 worst_q_ratio=1.17
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064_astrometric_residuals.png (4791 matched stars from wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034_astrometric_residuals.png (4792 matched stars from wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546_astrometric_residuals.png (4768 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547_astrometric_residuals.png (4770 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.52 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34453_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 34453_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:55.69 +12:58:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34454_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 34454_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:08.70 +10:45:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34456_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 34456_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:57.46 +13:56:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03781_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 03781_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:42.58 +10:01:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits
Image size: 940.8'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.252 +13:57:36.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:41.252 +13:57:36.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0464 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
Image size: 940.7'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:38.849 +13:57:00.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.892 +14:00:23.31
Second-epoch image center 07:06:38.849 +13:57:00.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0576 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:41.252 +13:57:36.38
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:38.849 +13:57:00.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01390 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EaUe0Mq28P
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sKDI6nfSiw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xug60zup6c
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fm7bBgxh9h
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec +8.4557 to +19.3457 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec 8.4557 to 19.3457 deg
Loaded 19038 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10463 out of 16396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16396 out of 208537 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.735100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.735100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec +8.4557 to +19.3457 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2364 to 114.8317 deg, Dec 8.4557 to 19.3457 deg
Loaded 19038 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10463 out of 16396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16396 out of 208537 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 174030 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3404 to 114.8535 deg, Dec +8.5565 to +19.2859 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3404 to 114.8535 deg, Dec 8.5565 to 19.2859 deg
Loaded 18692 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11904 out of 16168 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16168 out of 174030 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 127 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
15.2 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.EaUe0Mq28P (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=42, blended=33805, bad_region=29686, passed=208495
Got 208495 stars (including 147891 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 208495 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4818 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 185465 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4818 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 185465 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 185465 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4778 stars left (next iteration limit 5255)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=4778 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=1556 n_q2=875 n_q3=1578 n_q4=769 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.219
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sKDI6nfSiw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=45, blended=23358, bad_region=33384, passed=173985
Got 173985 stars (including 122046 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 173985 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4814 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150440 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4814 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150440 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150440 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 4777 stars left (next iteration limit 5255)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=4777 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.586 n_q1=1276 n_q2=1027 n_q3=1377 n_q4=1097 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xug60zup6c (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=4759, bad_region=6020, passed=76828
Got 76828 stars (including 66220 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 76828 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4774 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72367 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72367 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72367 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4772 stars left (next iteration limit 5250)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4772 robust_rms=5.342 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.524 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4772 robust_rms=0.652 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.699 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4772 robust_rms=0.533 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.573 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4772 robust_rms_before=1.427 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.542 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.533 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.587 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.573
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.587 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits N_match=4772 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.556 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.624 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.597 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.501 n_q1=1780 n_q2=632 n_q3=1659 n_q4=701 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.123
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fm7bBgxh9h (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=4748, bad_region=6079, passed=77520
Got 77520 stars (including 66905 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 77520 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 4769 stars left (next iteration limit 5245)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4769 robust_rms=5.371 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.080 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4769 robust_rms=0.617 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.664 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4769 robust_rms=0.545 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.564 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4769 robust_rms_before=1.343 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.550 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.545 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.584 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.564
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.584 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits N_match=4769 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.554 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.613 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.608 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.525 n_q1=1775 n_q2=634 n_q3=1669 n_q4=691 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-56-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0546.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_062517_TTUQ2b1x1_1550201_iBj65WiV/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:56:10.86 +12:22:49.5: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:17:12.77 +14:22:29.9: 13.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:46:46.71 +14:56:29.5: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:12:57.75 +15:08:42.8: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:13:28.83 +15:21:16.7: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:49:43.71 +15:10:57.4: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:45:50.66 +17:22:06.6: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:14:51.76 +09:50:11.8: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:48:20.02 +11:20:22.8: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:46:46.71 +14:56:29.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:13:28.83 +15:21:16.7: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:56:10.86 +12:22:49.5: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:12:57.75 +15:08:42.8: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:17:12.77 +14:22:29.9: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:46:46.71 +14:56:29.5: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2764 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:28.83 +15:21:16.7: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2545 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:10.86 +12:22:49.5: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6059 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:12:57.75 +15:08:42.8: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4367 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:17:12.77 +14:22:29.9: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3605 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:49:43.71 +15:10:57.4: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:14:51.76 +09:50:11.8: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:49:43.71 +15:10:57.4: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2820 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:48:20.02 +11:20:22.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:45:50.66 +17:22:06.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:14:51.76 +09:50:11.8: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1304 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:48:20.02 +11:20:22.8: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3290 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:45:50.66 +17:22:06.6: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4713 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:00:28.38 +17:33:26.9: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:50:04.07 +15:55:22.1: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:03:28.79 +16:23:16.9: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:45:56.60 +17:26:14.4: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:43:20.31 +10:19:52.7: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:55:11.09 +17:59:02.3: 13.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:47:36.29 +14:40:48.3: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:00:28.38 +17:33:26.9: 12.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:00:28.38 +17:33:26.9: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1872 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:50:04.07 +15:55:22.1: 13.24 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:03:28.79 +16:23:16.9: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:50:04.07 +15:55:22.1: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1339 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:03:28.79 +16:23:16.9: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1128 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:45:56.60 +17:26:14.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:45:56.60 +17:26:14.4: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2199 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:44:53.62 +14:10:00.5: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:43:20.31 +10:19:52.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:47:36.29 +14:40:48.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:20.31 +10:19:52.7: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1192 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:47:36.29 +14:40:48.3: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0568 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:55:11.09 +17:59:02.3: 13.05 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:55:11.09 +17:59:02.3: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0107 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:53:10.83 +11:45:00.4: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:06:29.69 +10:27:25.7: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:44:53.62 +14:10:00.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:44:53.62 +14:10:00.5: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9188 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:53:10.83 +11:45:00.4: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:06:29.69 +10:27:25.7: 12.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:53:10.83 +11:45:00.4: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8584 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:29.69 +10:27:25.7: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4267 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:51:37.59 +10:36:42.0: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:23:44.15 +16:43:42.6: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:52:59.96 +10:33:04.4: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:20:02.15 +16:15:57.3: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:20:02.15 +16:15:57.3: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:52:59.96 +10:33:04.4: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:23:44.15 +16:43:42.6: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:51:37.59 +10:36:42.0: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:02.15 +16:15:57.3: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2624 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.76 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:23:44.15 +16:43:42.6: ref_mag=11.76 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9921 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:51:37.59 +10:36:42.0: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5852 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:52:59.96 +10:33:04.4: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5309 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:41:13.65 +11:02:15.4: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:41:13.65 +11:02:15.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:13.65 +11:02:15.4: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7473 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:40:20.93 +12:02:11.7: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:57:10.45 +11:00:09.8: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:41:01.15 +09:32:44.3: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:45:29.27 +10:50:57.4: 13.31 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:40:20.93 +12:02:11.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:40:20.93 +12:02:11.7: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0825 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:57:10.45 +11:00:09.8: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:41:01.15 +09:32:44.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:57:10.45 +11:00:09.8: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9013 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:01.15 +09:32:44.3: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1625 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:08:12.44 +17:43:27.0: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:59:45.09 +16:08:26.5: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:45:29.27 +10:50:57.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:45:29.27 +10:50:57.4: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0102 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:49:54.59 +10:51:48.3: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:08:12.44 +17:43:27.0: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:59:45.09 +16:08:26.5: 13.16 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:59:45.09 +16:08:26.5: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0789 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:54:26.41 +14:38:33.6: 13.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:49:54.59 +10:51:48.3: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:19:01.70 +14:04:52.2: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:49:54.59 +10:51:48.3: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1249 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:43:04.17 +15:15:28.4: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:53:47.52 +15:35:44.4: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:15:15.77 +15:08:39.1: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:46:08.76 +14:19:47.0: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:54:26.41 +14:38:33.6: 13.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:26.41 +14:38:33.6: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3347 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:19:01.70 +14:04:52.2: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:01.70 +14:04:52.2: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1178 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:51:49.09 +09:36:53.6: 13.46 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:43:04.17 +15:15:28.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:53:47.52 +15:35:44.4: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:53:47.52 +15:35:44.4: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2209 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:15:15.77 +15:08:39.1: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:15.77 +15:08:39.1: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1678 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:46:08.76 +14:19:47.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:46:08.76 +14:19:47.0: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4607 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:51:49.09 +09:36:53.6: 13.36 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:51:49.09 +09:36:53.6: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3952 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:49:54.36 +10:46:22.2: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:49:54.36 +10:46:22.2: 13.28 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:49:54.36 +10:46:22.2: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4302 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:04:59.64 +13:33:11.3: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:47:02.71 +16:15:43.7: 13.63 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:04:59.64 +13:33:11.3: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:47:02.71 +16:15:43.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:47:02.71 +16:15:43.7: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5778 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:21:44.05 +11:24:40.4: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:21:44.05 +11:24:40.4: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:21:44.05 +11:24:40.4: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4570 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out249376.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out249465.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out249526.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51429.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248987_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 248987_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:43.45 +12:58:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248988_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 248988_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248991_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 248991_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248995_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 248995_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:01.44 +13:45:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248999_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 248999_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:50.58 +13:25:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249001_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249001_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249005_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249005_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:37.24 +15:43:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249006_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249006_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249007_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249007_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249008_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249008_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:21.12 +14:23:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249009_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249009_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249015_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249015_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249016_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249016_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249020_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249020_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:32.53 +13:15:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249027_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249027_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249028_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249028_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:48.96 +13:52:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249029_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249029_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:54.69 +10:24:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249038_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249038_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:09.23 +17:52:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249044_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249044_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249045_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249045_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249048_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249048_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249049_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249049_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:46.95 +14:37:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249064_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249064_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249069_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249069_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249070_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249070_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:49.01 +12:09:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249072_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249072_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:01.91 +11:00:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249073_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249073_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249075_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249075_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:53.96 +12:32:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249090_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249090_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249091_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249091_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:49.72 +11:45:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249095_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249095_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:31.99 +09:55:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249099_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249099_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249100_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249100_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249103_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249103_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249104_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249104_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:53.74 +11:05:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249105_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249105_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:19.66 +14:42:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249107_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249107_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:21.04 +15:19:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249113_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249113_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:05.78 +14:31:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249115_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249115_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:44.45 +10:01:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249120_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249120_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249123_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249123_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249127_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249127_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249128_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249128_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:28.84 +15:41:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249132_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249132_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249134_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249134_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:47.54 +15:10:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249136_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249136_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:05.13 +14:12:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249145_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249145_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:20.85 +15:45:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249156_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249156_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:09.78 +16:09:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249164_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249164_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:49.51 +09:53:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249166_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249166_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:40.76 +16:09:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249167_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249167_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:56.17 +13:15:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249176_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249176_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:25.68 +16:11:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249180_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249180_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:40.27 +12:51:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249190_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249190_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:19.08 +16:24:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249192_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249192_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:17.40 +10:38:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249196_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249196_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:14.05 +13:51:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249202_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249202_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:17.15 +14:15:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249204_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249204_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:59.40 +09:55:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249207_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249207_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:08.03 +16:04:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249217_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249217_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:43.15 +15:59:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249220_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249220_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:40.72 +16:56:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249221_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249221_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:04.45 +09:51:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249237_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249237_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:13.09 +15:07:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249240_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249240_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249252_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249252_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:50.03 +12:33:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249258_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249258_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:29.11 +12:08:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249267_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249267_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:20.41 +11:00:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249268_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249268_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:38.55 +16:09:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249269_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249269_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:00.91 +15:25:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249273_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249273_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:47.02 +09:46:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249275_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249275_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:58.30 +13:11:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249276_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249276_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:14.53 +10:36:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249281_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249281_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:16.58 +15:18:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249287_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249287_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:30.53 +14:06:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249289_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249289_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:07.46 +16:09:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249300_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249300_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:51.13 +12:40:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249301_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249301_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249306_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249306_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:07.54 +10:39:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249310_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249310_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:09.46 +14:14:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249312_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249312_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249315_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249315_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:50.77 +16:55:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249318_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249318_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:33.29 +17:27:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249326_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249326_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249330_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249330_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:43.78 +16:12:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249333_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249333_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:59.00 +12:40:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249347_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249347_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:39.96 +13:12:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249350_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249350_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249351_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249351_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:38.26 +10:55:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249353_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249353_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:10.95 +17:50:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249376_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
Preparing report for the candidate 249376_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249377_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249377_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:15.80 +09:43:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249382_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249382_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249394_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249394_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:19.58 +15:47:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249395_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249395_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249411_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249411_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:54.04 +12:25:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249435_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249435_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249438_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249438_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:57.02 +14:13:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249445_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249445_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249448_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249448_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249457_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249457_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:55.45 +13:57:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249465_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
Preparing report for the candidate 249465_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249466_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249466_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249469_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249469_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249472_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249472_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249478_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249478_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249488_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249488_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:58.22 +14:29:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249492_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249492_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:08.96 +13:56:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249496_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249496_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249503_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249503_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:42.95 +10:43:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249506_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249506_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:16.09 +16:22:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249513_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249513_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:11.79 +16:34:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249517_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249517_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:17.73 +16:33:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249521_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249521_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:05.58 +13:13:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249526_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
Preparing report for the candidate 249526_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249527_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249527_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249528_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249528_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249541_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249541_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:06.02 +11:00:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249543_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 249543_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:27.84 +11:30:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228069_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 228069_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:29.71 +13:18:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51429_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
Preparing report for the candidate 51429_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89197_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 89197_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:55.73 +12:58:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106125_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 106125_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:57.48 +13:56:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23394_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 23394_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:16.44 +09:44:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190647_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 190647_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:33.35 +16:51:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41021_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 41021_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:08.70 +10:45:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68285_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 68285_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:49.96 +12:12:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27049_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547
The candidate 27049_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_05-57-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0547 did not pass the final checks